DELIBERATE PRACTICE - FASDonline• Deliberate Practice is a percentage of the Instructional...
Transcript of DELIBERATE PRACTICE - FASDonline• Deliberate Practice is a percentage of the Instructional...
DELIBERATE PRACTICE
The Marzano Causal Teacher Evaluation Model
Teacher Evaluation Metrics
• Focus: Instructional Practice
2
Student Growth
Instructional Practice
Instructional Practice is where classroom observations and
feedback are provided to teachers throughout the
year.
Review: Last Summer’s Scoring and Weighting Workshop - FLDOE Recommendation
• Year 1
3
• Year 2
Status Score 60%
Deliberate Practice
Score 40%
Status Score 100%
Instructional Practice 50%
Instructional Practice 50%
Why do we need Deliberate Practice?
4
What if?
• What if every teacher engaged in a self assessment of their classroom practice?
• What if the Individual Professional Development Plan was aligned to the teacher evaluation system to help teachers measurably improve the Instructional Practice score?
5
The Deliberate Practice Plan may be used as an option for districts in place of their current IPDP if:
• Districts follow the FLDOE-approved model as presented
• At least one of the Deliberate Practice growth targets is developed with consideration of appropriate student growth data
6
What is Deliberate Practice?
7
Deliberate Practice
Deliberate practice is a way for teachers to grow their expertise through a series of planned activities, reflection, and collaboration. Involved in the series is a protocol: • setting personal goals, • focused practice, • focused feedback, • observing and discussing teaching, and • monitoring your progress
8
Making the Connections
Deliberate Practice
Teacher Behavior
Student Achievement
9
Domain 1
Domains 2-4
11
Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model
When these strategies are used, here is the typical effect on raising student achievement (percentile gain corrected):
Building Vocabulary 20% Effort and Recognition 14% Graphic Organizers 13% Homework 15% Identifying Similarities and Differences 20%
Interactive Games 20% Nonlinguistic Representations 17%
Note Taking 17% Practice 14% Setting Goals/Objectives 25% Student Discussion/Chunking 17% Summarizing 19% Tracking Student Progress and Using Scoring Scales
34%
Deliberate Practice Involves:
13
Focused Practice
Focused Feedback
Remember the Goal
An expectation that all teachers can increase their expertise from year to year which produces gains in student achievement from year to year
with a powerful cumulative effect
14
Fundamentals of Deliberate Practice
Deliberate Practice begins with empowering teachers!
• Teachers should take the lead in identifying their personal growth goals, and collaborate with their principals on their goals.
− Principal must approve the IPDP
• Deliberate Practice should be structured, resourced and monitored by the principal.
15
16
Teacher Growth Must Occur in Three Major Areas:
Major Areas: 1. Scaffolding of Unit Content (around Unit
Learning Goals) into Daily Lessons that support student learning
2. Implementation and Use of Instructional Strategies
3. Deliberate Practice of Strategies
Steps for Developing a Deliberate Practice Plan
1. Self Assessment
2. Identify Focus Strategies
3. Create Measurable Goals
4. Actions in the Classroom
5. Reflection
6. Tracking Progress and Celebrating Success
17
Linking Performance Scales to Teacher Reflection and Deliberate Practice
Autonomous Phase
Shaping Phase
Cognitive Phase
18
Rating Scale for Domain Elements (State Model Teacher Evaluation Scale)
4 3 2 1 0
Formative Ratings Used for Each Domain Element
Innovating
Applying
Developing
Beginning
Not Using
19
Cognitive Phase
Shaping Phase
Autonomous Phase
Linking Performance Scales to Teacher Reflection and Deliberate Practice
Highly Effective Effective Needs
Improvement/Developing
Unsatisfactory
Formative Ratings Used for Each Domain Element
20
Cognitive Phase
Shaping Phase
Autonomous Phase
21
22
Self-Assessment Example
23
24
Identify Focus Strategies Example
25
26
Write Measurable Goals Example
27
28
Action Steps Example
29
30
Reflection Example
31
32
Tracking Progress Example
Appendix Tools
• Recommendations for Developing Goals and Resources
• Goal #1 – Progress Check-In and Reflection Log • Goal #2 – Progress Check-In and Reflection Log • Goal #3 – Progress Check-In and Reflection Log • Video Self-Observation Guide (Optional) • Peer Observation Guide (Optional) • Instructional Rounds Guide (Optional) • Glossary of Terms
33
Recapping the Benefits of Deliberate Practice
• Empowers teachers to take responsibility for their own professional growth and development
• Generates sources of evidences for other domains (planning/preparing, reflection/professionalism, etc.)
• As teachers increase their effectiveness with target
strategies, it tends to lift their overall teaching
34
DELIBERATE PRACTICE Scoring and Calculation
Review: Last Summer’s Scoring and Weighting Workshop – FLDOE Recommendation • Year 1
36
• Year 2
Status Score 60%
Deliberate Practice
Score 40%
Status Score 100%
Instructional Practice 50%
Instructional Practice 50%
5 Steps to Calculate the Deliberate Practice Score
District or teacher identifies target strategies following district policies Step 1
Obtain at least 2 data points for each target strategy Step 2 For each element, determine the number of growth levels from the first data point to the last data point Step 3 Use the average growth level and the final data points against the scale to obtain the Deliberate Practice Score for each target element Step 4 Average the Deliberate Practice Scores for each target element for the final element score. Step 5
38
Teacher identifies the following targets: • Domain1
• #1 Providing clear learning goals and scales (rubrics) • #2 Tracking student progress • #3 Celebrating success
Example Step 1 District or teacher identifies target element(s) following district policies
39
Example Step 2 Obtain at least 2 data points for each element
October Data Point 1
March Data Point 2
Domain 1: #1 Providing clear learning goals and scales (rubrics)
0 3
Domain 1: #2 Tracking student progress 2 3
Domain 1: #3 Celebrating success 1 3
Note: Scores are based on the Marzano scale: Innovating (4), Applying (3), Developing (2), Beginning (1) and Not Using (0)
40
Example Step 3 For each element, determine the number of growth levels from the first data point to the last data point using the Marzano Scale
Note: Scores are based on the Marzano scale: Innovating (4), Applying (3), Developing (2), Beginning (1) and Not Using (0)
October Data Point
1
March Data Point
2
Growth Levels
Domain 1: #1 Providing clear learning goals and scales (rubrics)
0 3 3
Domain 1: #2 Tracking student progress 2 3 1
Domain 1: #3 Celebrating success 1 3 2
41
Example Step 4 Use the scale to obtain the Deliberate Practice Score for each target element
Highly Effective (4)
Effective (3)
Needs Improvement or Developing
(2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
Grows 3 levels Grows 2 levels Grows 1 level Achieves no growth
Or grows to Level 4
Or grows to Level 3
Or grows to Level 2 Or scores at Level 1 Note: The district may decide which rule takes precedence
42
Example Step 5 Average the growth levels across target elements
Levels Grown
Final Level Deliberate Practice Score
Domain 1: #1 Providing clear learning goals and scales (rubrics)
3 3 4*
Domain 1: #2 Tracking student progress 1 3 3
Domain 1: #3 Celebrating success 2 3 3
Final Deliberate Practice Score: 3.33
* This score may be vary depending on the precedence of the scoring rules. This scenario uses the highest scoring rule.
Deliberate Practice Score
Highly Effective Effective Needs Improvement Or Developing Unsatisfactory
3.5 - 4 2.5 - 3.4 1.5 - 2.4 1 - 1.4
Issue: How to Handle No Growth
Two Options:
• Score as “Unsatisfactory” – 1 Point
• Score as “Unsatisfactory,” but allow for one target element with no growth to be “forgiven” if multiple elements were targeted
45
No Growth Sample Scenarios Deliberate Practice Score
Start Finish No Growth = Unsatisfactory Forgive One Element 3, 3, 3 3, 3, 3 1 (Unsatisfactory) 1 (Unsatisfactory) 3, 3, 3 3, 3, 4 2 (Needs Improvement) 2.5 (Effective) 3, 3, 3 3, 4, 4 3 (Effective) 4 (Highly Effective) 2, 2, 2 2, 2, 2 1 (Unsatisfactory) 1 (Unsatisfactory) 2, 2, 2 2, 2, 3 1.6 (Needs Improvement) 2 (Needs Improvement) 2, 2, 2 2, 3, 3 2.3 (Needs Improvement) 3 (Effective) 2, 2, 2 2, 3, 4 2.7 (Effective) 3.5 (Highly Effective) 3, 3 3, 3 1 (Unsatisfactory) 1 (Unsatisfactory) 3, 3 3, 4 2.5 (Effective) 4 (Highly Effective) 2, 2 2, 2 1 (Unsatisfactory) 1 (Unsatisfactory) 2, 2 2, 3 2 (Needs Improvement) 3 (Effective) 2, 2 2, 4 2.5 (Effective) 4 (Highly Effective) 3 3 1 (Unsatisfactory) 1 (Unsatisfactory) 2 2 1 (Unsatisfactory) 1 (Unsatisfactory)
Highly Effective
Effective
Needs Improvement
Unsatisfactory
46
Additive: Status Score + Addition of Deliberate Practice = Final Instructional Practice Score
Two Methods for Calculating Instructional Practice When Including Deliberate Practice
Inclusive: Status Score + Deliberate Practice = Final Instructional Practice Score
Status Score
Deliberate Practice
Status Score
Deliberate Practice
Final Instructional Practice Score Final Instructional Practice Score
Additive Method Considerations: • Deliberate Practice is added to
the Instructional Practice Score • Performance in Deliberate
Practice only adds to the Instructional Practice score; it is not punitive
• Top scores are possible without growth in Deliberate Practice
• High reward for high growth • More teachers will rank higher
on the performance scale
47
Status Score
Deliberate Practice
Final Instructional Practice Score
Inclusive Method Considerations: • Deliberate Practice is a percentage of
the Instructional Practice Score • Performance in Deliberate Practice
can be punitive if the teacher shows no growth.
• Top scores are not possible without growth in Deliberate Practice
• Reward for high growth and high status score
• More teachers will rank lower on the performance scale
48
Status Score
Deliberate Practice
Final Instructional Practice Score
Sample Scenarios
Typical Teacher Deliberate Practice 2.5 Status Score 3.1 Additive Score: 3.60 (Highly Effective) Inclusive Score (40%, 60%): 2.86 (Effective) Difference: .74 points
The Additive method puts the teacher in the Highly Effective range rather than the middle of the Effective range.
FLDOE Recommendation
50
2012/13 2013/14
Additive Inclusive
2012/13 2013/14
2014/15
Pilot Additive Inclusive
OR
Next Steps
• Implementing the Monitoring Plan
• Monitoring for results and making adjustments
• Identifying and sharing best practices
• Celebrating successes
51
Professional Development
• Deliberate Practice for Administrators • Deliberate Practice for Teachers • Deeper Connections • Planning and Creating Units of Instruction