Definition(s) of PPP (Absolute vs. Relative PPP) PPP within the Monetary Approach to the B of P Does...

23
LECTURE 10: Purchasing Power Parity Primary Motivation: How realistic is the assumption P = ? Secondary motivation: How integrated are global goods markets? Definition(s) of PPP (Absolute vs. Relative PPP) PPP within the Monetary Approach to the B of P Does PPP hold in practice? Barriers to international goods market arbitrage Four observed patterns of deviation from PPP Arbitrage enforces the Law Of One Price in some sectors, but not in others:

Transcript of Definition(s) of PPP (Absolute vs. Relative PPP) PPP within the Monetary Approach to the B of P Does...

LECTURE 10: Purchasing Power Parity• Primary Motivation: How realistic is the assumption P = ?• Secondary motivation: How integrated are global goods markets?

• Definition(s) of PPP (Absolute vs. Relative PPP)• PPP within the Monetary Approach to the B of P• Does PPP hold in practice?

• Barriers to international goods market arbitrage• Four observed patterns of deviation from PPP• Arbitrage enforces the Law Of One Price

in some sectors, but not in others:

ITF-220 Prof.J.Frankel

PPP: ALTERNATIVE DEFINTIONS

Absolute PPP : P ≡ price of a basket of goods in domestic currency

esp. from the World Bank’s International Comparison Program.

• RER = 1, where real exchange rate RER ≡ E

• P = E P*• E =

• In logs: e = p - p*.=

Prof. Jeffrey Frankel, Harvard Kennedy School

PPP: ALTERNATIVE DEFINTIONS (continued)

Relative PPP CPI ≡ is a price index, expressed relative to an arbitrary base year

e.g., “CPI2000 ≡ 100.0” (from national agencies).

Define real exchange rate Q ≡ E .• Q is constant (at ),

• CPI (E)(CPI*) . • In logs, Δe = Δ cpi – Δ cpi* (relative to some base year).

• Annual depreciation = π - π* .

or E =

ITF-220 Prof.J.Frankel

Does PPP hold in practice?

• No.

• Q varies a lot.

Four patterns ofdeviation from PPPand their likely origins:

a) Band <= barriers

b) Random walk <= shifts in terms of trade

c) Trend <= Balassa-Samuelson effect

d) Autoregression <= sticky prices .

Band Random Walk

Trend Autoregression

Q Q

Q Q

ITF-220 Prof.J.Frankel

𝑄

ITF-220 Prof.J.Frankel

Barriers to International Integrationof Goods Markets

• Transportation costs, which depend on:

• geography

• technology

• Tariffs & non-tariff trade barriers

• Currencies

• Other border frictions

Source: FREIGHT RATES AND PRODUCTIVITYGAINS IN BRITISH TRAMP SHIPPING 1869-1950 by Saif I. Shah Mohammed and Jeffrey G. WilliamsonNBER Working Paper 9531 (http://www.nber.org/papers/w9531)

Long-distance transport costs fell during the 19th century.

ITF-220 Prof.J.Frankel

By 1914, low transport costs, UK-led free trade, & the Pax Brittanica allowed arbitrage between

the US & UK in wheat.

ITF-220 Prof.J.Frankel

ITF-220 Prof.J.Frankel

Arbitrage enforces the Law Of One Price in some sectors, but not in others

• For homogeneous mineral & agriculturalcommodities, the Law of One Price– holds, if there are no trade barriers (gold),– fails, if there are trade barriers (sugar).

• For goods & services not traded internationally, there can be no arbitrage (haircuts).

• Other sectors fall in between:– Manufactured goods.– Big Mac hamburgers.

The Law of One Price holds relatively wellfor a standardized metal such as gold.

G.Alessandria & J.Kaboski, 2008, “Why are Goods So Cheap in Some Countries? ” Business Review, Fed,Res,Bank of Philadelphia, Q2. Table 2.

Note: India has tariffs & quotas on gold imports.{

ITF-220 Prof.J.Frankel

ITF-220 Prof.J.Frankel

High trade barriers in

agricultural products are still

common, preventing

price arbitrage.

ITF-220 Prof.J.Frankel

Prices of nontraded services vary widely.Notice that they are

lower in poorer (low-wage) countries

than rich.

ITF-220 Prof.J.Frankel

Big Macs are partly traded (ingredients) & partly nontraded (cooking & retail).Their price varies widely across countries.

Jan.22, 2014Why is the price of Big Macs

so high in Norway?

than in Japan?

higher in Brazil

Low in India & S.Africa?

ITF-220 Prof.J.Frankel

Non-Traded Goods• Even if arbitrage quickly equalized prices for traded goods,

it would not do so for goods that are not traded internationally.

• If the price of Non-Traded Goods rises more rapidly in Japan than in the US, then the yen will come to appear overvalued in real terms, i.e., relative to PPP.

• Balassa-Samuelson effect: higher income per capita => higher relative price of non-traded goods => real appreciation.– Usual mechanism: the higher productivity occurs in Traded Goods sector

= > ( PTG /PNTG ) ↓ . – But PTG = E PTG *, tied to world markets

{ } or PNTG ↑ => CPI ↑ either way, => (E P*/CPI)↓ : real appreciation.

E ↓ (under a float)

Balassa-Samuelson relationship: Absolute price levels are higher in rich countries

(real exchange rates are lower).

G.Alessandria & J. Kaboski, 2008, “Why are Goods So Cheap in Some Countries? ” Bus.Rev, Fed.Res. Bank of Philadelphia, Q2. Fig.1

1/Q

ITF-220 Prof.J.Frankel

Sticky goods prices => autoregressive pattern in real exchange rate

(though you need 100 years of data to see it)

1925 ₤ return to gold

1931, 49, 69₤ devaluations

UK inflation duringBretton Woods era

Thatcherappreciation 1990: ₤

enteredEMS

1992: ₤ leftEMS

WWI inflation

Bottom line conclusion from PPPfor the rest of the course

• For most goods & services, prices are “sticky”– i.e., we can take their prices as exogenous in the SR.– Exceptions:

• mostly agricultural & mineral products• Especially in very small open economies.

• After a few years pass (Medium Run), we must realize that prices adjust,

• closing about ¼ gap per year.• In the Long Run, prices may adjust fully,

– returning us to a LR PPP equilibrium, – although even in the LR there can be changes in ,

• e.g., from exogenous changes in terms of trade• or from Balassa-Samuelson effect.

ITF-220 Prof.J.Frankel

Appendix 1: PPP within the MABPEffect of a devaluation

• E ↑ => P ↑ => (M/P) ↓ => • (M/P) < L => “Excess Demand for Money”

• => residents cut back spending on goods (or assets)

• => BP ↑ the “real balance effect.”

• => Res rising over time

• + Nonsterilization M rising over time => BP is self-

correcting.

}

Long distance transport costs fell sharply during

the 19th century.

Source: FREIGHT RATES AND PRODUCTIVITYGAINS IN BRITISH TRAMP SHIPPING 1869-1950 by Saif I. Shah Mohammed and Jeffrey G. WilliamsonNBER Working Paper 9531 (http://www.nber.org/papers/w9531)

Appendix 2: Transport Costs since the 19th century

ITF-220 Prof.J.Frankel

Source: FREIGHT RATES AND PRODUCTIVITYGAINS IN BRITISH TRAMP SHIPPING 1869-1950 by Saif I. Shah Mohammed and Jeffrey G. WilliamsonNBER Working Paper 9531 (http://www.nber.org/papers/w9531)

ITF-220 Prof.J.Frankel

Appendix 3:The Big Mac Index in 2000. The price tends

to be higher in rich countries (e.g., Europe & Japan, compared to China), and in countrieswith overvalued currencies (e.g., Argentinain 2000).

ITF-220 Prof.J.Frankel

Source: The Economist, January 2003.

Three years later,Big Macs were still expensive in Europe and cheap in China;

but now (2003), they were cheaper still in Argentina.

Why?

Devaluation.

Source: “The Purchasing Power Parity Puzzle,” by Kenneth Rogoff, Journal of Economic Literature (1996).

Balassa-Samuelsonrelationship

1/Q

ITF-220 Prof.J.Frankel