December 17, 2013 Agenda Packet

City Council Agenda of 4 December 17, 2013

NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING

AN AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS 9:00 A.M. - Tuesday, December 17, 2013

McNease Convention Center, South Meeting Room 500 Rio Concho Drive

San Angelo, TX 76903 THE MCNEASE CONVENTION CENTER IS ACCESSIBLE TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES. ACCESSIBLE ENTRIES AND SPECIALLY MARKED PARKING SPACES ARE AVAILABLE AT BOTH MAIN ENTRANCES AT SURBER DRIVE AND RIO CONCHO DRIVE. IF ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE IS NEEDED TO OBSERVE OR COMMENT, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, ROOM 208, CITY HALL, 657-4405, AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. City Council meetings are broadcast on Channel 17-Government Access at 10:30 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. every day for two weeks beginning on the Thursday after each meeting.

As a courtesy to those in attendance, please place your cell phone on “Silent” or “Vibrate” Thank You!

I. OPEN SESSION (9:00 A.M.)

A. Call to Order

B. Prayer and Pledge

"Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one state under God, one and indivisible.”

C. Recognition

“Central High School Girls Volleyball Team”, to be accepted by Coach Connie Bozarth and team members

D. Public Comment

The Council takes public comment on all items in the Regular Agenda. Public input on a Regular Agenda item will be taken at its appropriate discussion. Public input on an item not on the Agenda or Consent Agenda may be identified and requested for consideration by the Council at this time. The Council may request an item to be placed on a future agenda, or for a Consent Agenda item, to be moved to the Regular Agenda for public comment.

On public hearing items, public input will be received on each item immediately following the Council discussion and prior to any action on the item. Each member of the public should make their remarks from the podium and begin by stating their name. Remarks by each citizen will be limited to three to five minutes, unless waived by a council member for all speaking on that matter. No individual will be allowed to speak more than once on any one subject until every citizen wishing to comment has done so.

II. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Consideration of approving the December 3, 2013 City Council Regular meeting minutes 2. Consideration of awarding VM-14-13 Police Computers and Digital Video Equipment, utilizing the State

DIR Contract# TX-DIR-SDD-1365, in an amount not to exceed $67,000.00 from VetSource Mobility and authorizing the City Manager to execute any necessary related documents (R.Kramer)


3. Consideration of adopting a Resolution of the City of San Angelo authorizing the Mayor to execute a tax-resale (quitclaim) deed conveying all right, title and interest of the City of San Angelo, and all other taxing units interested in the Tax Foreclosure Judgment or Tax Warrant: (C.Preas)

a. 2517 Abilene Street, (Duran), Lot 2, Block 61, Hatcher, $2,100.00, Suite No. B-11-0178-TAX b. 136 11th Street, (TSU Properties), Lots 19 & 20, Block 56, Miles, $1,535.00, Suit No. D-12-0160-TAX c. 407 N Emerson Street, (Deanda), N60’ of Lots 15 & 16, Block 19, Ellis, $3,800.00, Suit No. C-11-

0155--TAX 4. Consideration of approving an updated Interlocal Agreement between the City of San Angelo and The

Cooperative Purchasing Network (TCPN) authorizing future City purchases as allowed by The State of Texas Government Code, Section 271, in substantially the attached from, and authorizing the City Manager to execute said Agreement (R.Banks)

5. Consideration of confirming the Park Commission’s appointment Ms. Julia Lane to serve and fill a 1st full term on the Park Commission (C.White)

6. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo (K.Boyd) Z13-37: SKG Engineering AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 17 West 8th Street, located approximately 200 feet west of the intersection of West 8th Street and North Chadbourne Street. This property specifically occupies the Miles Addition, Block 23, Lot 5, in north central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Two-Family Residential (RS-2) to General Commercial (CG) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

7. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance authorizing abandonments of public streets and right-of-ways in the Fairview Addition, Block 66, 67 and 74 in north central San Angelo (K.Boyd) AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT AND CLOSING OF UNIMPROVED STREETS AND ALLEY SEGMENTS, TO WIT: An 80' wide portion of the unimproved public right-of-way for Florence Street, extending approximately 680' northward from Hughes Street and immediately south of the railroad right-of-way (to include portions of the 100' right-of-way of Hughes Street), an approximately 100' x 270' portion of unimproved public right-of-way of Velma Street - And - a 20' x 430' alley right-of-way in Blocks 66 and 67 and 20' x 35' alley right-of-way in Block 74 of the Fairview Addition, in north central San Angelo; AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE THEREOF TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS; PROVIDING FOR THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ABANDONMENT AND CONVEYANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS

8. Second Hearing and consideration of adopting an Ordinance authorizing abandonments of public streets and right-of-ways in the Miles Addition Block 32 in north-central San Angelo (K.Boyd) AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT AND CLOSING OF THE FOLLOWING ALLEY, TO WIT: An approximately 20 foot wide x 495 foot long portion of alley running east to west, perpendicular to Martin Luther King Drive located in Block 32 of the Miles Addition in north-central San Angelo; AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE THEREOF TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS; PROVIDING FOR THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ABANDONMENT AND CONVEYANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS


III. REGULAR AGENDA:

D. EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSION

Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A. Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings be Open under the Section 551.074(a)(1) to deliberate the evaluation and duties of the City Manager and Section 551.072 to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property regarding lease of City owned property in the downtown area

E. PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT

9. Presentation of the 3rd and 4th Quarter 2013 Reports from the Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Council and the Convention & Visitors Bureau (CVB) (Presentation by CVB Vice President Pamela Miller and Vice President for Economic Development John Dugan)

10. Discussion and possible acceptance of Downtown Master Development Strategies document prepared by Catalyst Urban Development as part of PL-01-12 (Presentation by Interim Development Services Director AJ Fawver)

11. Discussion and possible action regarding strategies for obtaining compliance with Zoning Ordinance for existing parks around San Angelo containing recreational vehicles, manufactured housing, and mobile homes (Presentation by Interim Development Services Director AJ Fawver)

12. Discussion and consideration of petition seeking annexation (to San Angelo’s City limits) of certain property situated directly north, south, east and west of San Angelo and encompassing a vacant 4 acre tract extending southwest from Southland Boulevard and located directly east of an 8.995 acre tract annexed to the City Limits on March 5, 2013 that comprised the Prestonwood Addition, Section Two (Presentation by Interim Development Services Director AJ Fawver)

13. Consideration of adopting a Resolution casting votes for one nominee or distributing them among nominees for a position on the Board of Directors of the Tom Green County Appraisal District for the January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2015 term of office (Presentation by City Clerk Alicia Ramirez)

F. FOLLOW UP AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

14. Consideration of and possible action on matters discussed in Executive/Closed Session, if needed 15. Consideration of approving various Board nominations by Council and designated Councilmembers:

a. Airport Board: Patrick Nuytten (SMD4) to a 2nd full term October 2017, David Herbert (SMD5) to a 2nd full term October 2017, Elizabeth Grindstaff (SMD6) to a 1st full term October 2017, and Dave Dierker (Mayor) to a 1st full term October 2017

b. Civic Events Board: Timothy Condon (SMD2) to a 2nd full term October 2016 c. Design & Historic Review Commission: Margaret Mallard (SMD4) to a 2nd full term September

2015 and David Mazur (Mayor) to a 2nd full term September 2015 d. Parks & Recreation Advisory Board: Susan Gober (SMD1) to an unexpired term December 2015 e. Public Art Commission: Quang Le (SMD2) to a 1st full term April 2015 f. Water Advisory Board: Paul Alexander (SMD3) to a 1st full term September 2015

16. Announcements and consideration of Future Agenda Items 17. Consideration of conducting future evening City Council meetings


18. Adjournment

The City Council reserves the right to consider business out of the posted order, and at any time during the meeting, reserves the right to adjourn into executive session on any of the above posted agenda items which are not listed as executive session items and which qualify to be discussed in closed session under Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code.

Given by order of the City Council and posted in accordance with Title 5, Texas Government Code, Chapter 551, Thursday, December 12, 2013, at 5:00 P.M.

/s/________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

Central High School Girls Volleyball Team, Coach Connie Bozarth

• Season Record of 31‐10 District 13‐3

• District Runner Up; Bi‐District Champ; Area‐Finalist

• Consolation Champion at Duncanville Tournament of Champions

• Nita Vannoy Memorial Champions (2nd year in a row)

• 6th Place Mizuno Texas Shootout

• Raised $15,000 for Rally for a Cure Breast Cancer Awareness (8 year total approx $95,000)

• 12 players named Academic All District

• 3 players named Academic All State

• 9 players received All District recognition

CITY COUNCIL MINUTE RECORD The City of San Angelo Page 59 Tuesday, December 3, 2013 Vol. 105

OPEN SESSION BE IT REMEMBERED City Council convened in a regular meeting at A.M., Tuesday, December 3, 2013, in the San Angelo McNease Convention Center, 500 Rio Concho Drive, San Angelo, Texas. All duly authorized members of the Council, to-wit:

Mayor, Dwain Morrison Councilmember Rodney Fleming Councilmember Marty Self Councilmember Johnny Silvas Councilmember Don Vardeman Councilmember H.R. Wardlaw Councilmember Charlotte Farmer

were present and acting, with the exception of Councilmember Wardlaw, thus constituting a quorum. Whereupon, the following business was transacted:

An invocation was given by Father Rodney White and pledge was led by Lizzie Ireland, 5th Grader at Cornerstone Christian School.

PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS

“Concho Christmas Celebration Day”, Saturday, December 7, 2013, was accepted by Lee Pfluger, President of Concho Christmas Celebration “Giving Tuesday, December 3, 2013”, will be presented to Kaete Sullivan, Development Director of ICD, Inc., Stonebridge Training Residence, Newbridge Family Shelter, and Roland Nadeau, Public Relations & Marketing with Christians in Action

“River Fest Committee”, Coordination of and hosting by various organizations and individuals of the River Fest, a celebration of the completion of the Concho River Improvements Project and the 100th Anniversary of Santa Fe Park

PUBLIC COMMENT

No public comments were made.

CONSENT AGENDA

APPROVAL OF THE NOVEMBER 19, 2013 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES

CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING THE COMPETITIVE SEALED PROPOSAL WU-02-13 FOR THE 2013 RIO CONCHO SEWER LINE IMPROVEMENTS TO DARNELL CONSTRUCTION, LLC OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,093,869.54, AUTHORIZING STAFF TO NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT, AND AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT AND ANY RELATED DOCUMENTS (Discussed in Regular Session)

ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT AND ANY NECESSARY RELATED DOCUMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS AND MGT OF AMERICA, INC., FOR THE PROVISION OF TWO SEPARATE INDIRECT COST ALLOCATION PLANS; ONE BEING AN ANNUAL

Minutes Vol. 105 December 3, 2013

OMB A-87 COMPLIANT INDIRECT COST ALLOCATION PLAN BASED ON ACTUAL COSTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012, AND THE OTHER BEING AN ANNUAL GAAP COMPLIANT FULL COST ALLOCATION BASED ON BUDGETED COSTS FOR FY 2014, SAID AGREEMENT BEING IN THE AMOUNT $11,500.00 AND TO BE EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 1, 2013 THROUGH NOVEMBER 30, 2014, AND PROVIDING FOR AN OPTION TO RENEW FOR TWO (2) ADDITIONAL YEARS (Page 69, #2013-12-160)

ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION RATIFYING ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY MANAGER ON BEHALF OF THE CITY, OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY FISCAL YEAR 2013 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE GRANT (EMPG) AWARD #13TX-EMPG-0885 IN THE REVISED AMOUNT OF SIXTY-TWO THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED NINETY-FIVE AND 35/100 DOLLARS ($62,795.35); AND AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ANY OTHER RELATED DOCUMENTS (1, #2013-12-161)

SECOND HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10, TRAFFIC CONTROL REGARDING THE OPERATION OF GOLF CARTS (Discussed in Regular Session)

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 10, TRAFFIC CONTROL, OF THE SAN ANGELO CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO ADD A NEW ARTICLE 10.1700, ENTITLED “OPERATION OF GOLF CARTS ON PUBLIC STREETS” IN ORDER TO ALLOW AND REGULATE THE OPERATION OF GOLF CARTS ON ANY PART OF THE TRAFFIC AREA OF ANY PUBLIC STREET OR HIGHWAY WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS WHERE THE POSTED SPEED LIMIT IS NOT MORE THAN THIRTY (30) MILES PER HOUR, PROVIDING DEFINITIONS, ESTABLISHING LIMITATIONS ON SUCH OPERATION, ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR EQUIPMENT, ANNUAL REGISTRATION, ESTABLISHING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSES, ESTABLISHING A REGISTRATION FEE, PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE, AND AMENDING APPENDIX A, ENTITLED ARTICLE 3.000 BUSINESS RELATED FEES TO ADD A NEW SECTION 3.1300 GOLF CART REGISTRATION FEE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE

SECOND HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CONTINUANCE TO LEVY AND COLLECT A ONE-HALF CENT SALES AND USE TAX AS APPROVED BY THE VOTERS IN THE NOVEMBER 2, 2010 SPECIAL ELECTION (Page 73 , #2013-12-162)

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 2.3600 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS BY AMENDING SECTION 2.3606 TO ADD A NEW SUBSECTION 1 TO INCLUDE THE PROJECTS ALLOWED IN SECTION 4B OF ARTICLE 5190.6 V.A.C.S., AS AMENDED, (HEREINAFTER “ACT”) FOR THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO TO CONTINUE TO LEVY AND COLLECT A ONE-HALF CENT SALES AND USE TAX, SAID PROJECTS HAVING BEEN APPROVED BY THE VOTERS IN THE NOVEMBER 2, 2010 SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE UNDERTAKEN AS ALLOWED BY THE ACT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RESULTS OF THE SAID SPECIAL ELECTION; AND TO RESTATE AND RENUMBER SECTION 2.3606 IN ITS ENTIRETY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE

Minutes Page 61 December 3, 2013 Vol. 105

SECOND HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 2013-2014 BUDGET (Discussed in Regular Session)

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2013, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2014, FOR ENCUMBRANCES, RESTRICTED AND DEDICATED MONIES, INCOMPLETE PROJECTS, AND GRANTS

CONSIDERATION OF SELECTING IMAGE TREND FOR RFP FD-02-13, AUTHORIZING STAFF TO NEGOTIATE A FIRE DEPARTMENT RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AND IMAGE TREND FOR SOFTWARE, ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AND HARDWARE, AND FOR ADDITIONAL HARDWARE TO BE PURCHASED FROM OTHER VENDORS, IN A TOTAL COMBINED AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $210,000.00, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT AND ANY RELATED DOCUMENTS (Discussed in Regular Session)

Motion, to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented, was made by Councilmember Farmer and seconded by Councilmember Fleming. Motion carried unanimously.

REGULAR AGENDA: PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT

AWARD OF THE COMPETITIVE SEALED PROPOSAL WU-02-13 FOR THE 2013 RIO CONCHO SEWER LINE IMPROVEMENTS TO DARNELL CONSTRUCTION, LLC OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,093,869.54, AUTHORIZING STAFF TO NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT, AND AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT AND ANY RELATED DOCUMENTS

Responding to a question from Councilmember Silvas, Assistant Water Utilities Director Kevin Krueger informed the project is budgeted under the Wastewater Capital Improvements Program. Motion, to award project to Darnell Construction, LLC, as presented, was made by Councilmember Silvas and seconded by Councilmember Vardeman. Councilmember Self abstained from the vote. Motion carried unanimously. SECOND HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10, TRAFFIC CONTROL REGARDING THE OPERATION OF GOLF CARTS (Page 77, #2013-12-163) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 10, TRAFFIC CONTROL, OF THE SAN ANGELO CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO ADD A NEW ARTICLE 10.1700, ENTITLED “OPERATION OF GOLF CARTS ON PUBLIC STREETS” IN ORDER TO ALLOW AND REGULATE THE OPERATION OF GOLF CARTS ON ANY PART OF THE TRAFFIC AREA OF ANY PUBLIC STREET OR HIGHWAY WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS WHERE THE POSTED SPEED LIMIT IS NOT MORE THAN THIRTY (30) MILES PER HOUR, PROVIDING DEFINITIONS, ESTABLISHING LIMITATIONS ON SUCH OPERATION, ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR EQUIPMENT, ANNUAL REGISTRATION, ESTABLISHING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSES, ESTABLISHING A REGISTRATION FEE, PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE, AND AMENDING APPENDIX A, ENTITLED ARTICLE 3.000 BUSINESS RELATED FEES TO ADD A NEW SECTION 3.1300 GOLF CART REGISTRATION FEE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE Responding to a question from Councilmember Fleming, Assistant Police Chief Kevin Hollway clarified state law allows the use of golf carts for those persons living within a 2 mile radius of a golf course; therefore, these individuals will be exempt from registration and inspection process as outlined in the newly adopted ordinance. Motion, to adopt the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Fleming and seconded by Councilmember Self. Motion carried unanimously.


SECOND HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 2013-2014 BUDGET (Page 83, #2013-12-164) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2013, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2014, FOR ENCUMBRANCES, RESTRICTED AND DEDICATED MONIES, INCOMPLETE PROJECTS, AND GRANTS Responding to a question from Councilmember Vardeman, Civic Events Manager Angelica Pena stated staff has been working on the Coliseum Roof renovation project and the project is not included within this budget amendment. She informed staff hired an engineer to conduct an assessment of the roof. Ms. Pena stated after further review of the purchasing options, staff will utilize the Buyboard option. Assistant City Manager Rick Weise stated the project may possibly start after the Rodeo event. Motion, to adopt the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Vardeman and seconded by Councilmember Farmer. Motion carried unanimously. SELECTION OF IMAGE TREND FOR RFP FD-02-13, AUTHORIZING STAFF TO NEGOTIATE A FIRE DEPARTMENT RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AND IMAGE TREND FOR SOFTWARE, ANNUAL MAINTENANCE AND HARDWARE, AND FOR ADDITIONAL HARDWARE TO BE PURCHASED FROM OTHER VENDORS, IN A TOTAL COMBINED AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $210,000.00, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT AND ANY RELATED DOCUMENTS Responding to a question from Mayor Morrison, Assistant City Manager Rick Weise explained this item is not the collection service but the internal operating software. Assistant Fire Chief Scott Farris noted this is the second request for proposal on the software and the company is from Minnesota. Responding to a question from Councilmember Vardeman, Mr. Farris informed the software is viable for up to 10 years with access to future parts and a 5 year maintenance provision is also included at $15K per year. Motion, to authorize the selection of Image Trend, as presented, was made by Mayor Morrison and seconded by Councilmember Farmer. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2013 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN FOR USE OF CDBG FUNDS FOR NEIGHBORHOOD BLITZ AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SUBMIT SAID AMENDMENT TO HUD Neighborhood and Family Services Director Bob Salas presented background information. He informed a key part of the project involves replacing siding on depilated houses and in order to fund the project, staff is requesting approval to reallocate $102,969.00 of CDBG funds from complete rehabilitations to housing rehabilitations associated with the annual Neighborhood Blitz. Councilmember Vardeman spoke in opposition and suggested concentrated efforts should be made on complete house rehabilitations. Mr. Salas stated a specific program exists for such rehabilitations as well as projects associated through the Helping Hands Organization. However, he explained due to dwindling funds, the number of rehabilitations projects has tremendously decreased. Councilmember Vardeman suggested allocating these funds to the Helping Hands organization. Motion, to authorize the amendment, as presented, was made by Councilmember Silvas and seconded by Councilmember Farmer. Responding to a question from Councilmember Fleming, Mr. Salas stated the program is highly supported by the sponsors and are in support of the amendment. General discussion was held on non-essential City employees conducting the work, the total costs of the program, conducting complete renovations, and the number of volunteers from various organizations. Councilmember Vardeman clarified he is in support of the program however restated his difference in philosophy.

Minutes Page 63 December 3, 2013 Vol. 105 Public comments were made by West Texas Organizing Strategy representatives Craig Meyers, Jerry Sea, and Tim Davenport-Herbst in support of the program and fund reallocation. A vote was taken on the motion on the floor. Motion carried unanimously.

RECESS

At 9:52 A.M., Mayor Morrison called a recess.

RECONVENE

At 10:10 A.M., Council reconvened, and the following business was transacted:

Mayor Morrison announced the City Manager Daniel Valenzuela was attending the West Texas Consortium meeting in Big Spring. AUTHORIZATION OF THE 2014 PREMIUMS FOR HEALTH, DENTAL AND POST-65 HEALTH INSURANCE, AUTHORIZATION TO UTILIZE THE $201,288.00 ERRP FUNDS AND $180,300.00 FROM THE BUDGETED REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES (AKA RAINY DAY FUND) TO OFFSET PREMIUM INCREASES AS DESCRIBED, AUTHORIZATION TO UTILIZE THE REMAINING BUDGETED REVENUE OVER EXPENDITURES (AKA RAINY DAY FUND) FOR RETIREE DENTAL INCREASE, AND AUTHORIZATION TO INCREASE FOR THE STOP LOSS INSURANCE COVERAGE, AS PRESENTED Human Resources Director Lisa Marley presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the Permanent Supplemental Record. Responding to a question from Councilmember Farmer, Ms. Marley explained the Early Retiree Reinsurance Program noting the program is used as an incentive to companies to keep retirees less than age 62 on their insurance programs. She noted state law dictate specific uses of the funds to offset the employer or participants costs. General discussion was held on term of the contract, the eligible hospitals under the current plan, future increase projections, negotiating for two providers, and the limited number of providers under the current plan. Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Michael Dane commented on the administrative burdens created by the plan. Motion, to utilize the $201,288 ERRP funds and $180,300 from the budgeted revenue over expenditures (aka Rainy Day Fund) to offset premium increases as described, and the remaining Rainy Day Fund for Retiree dental increase, and to increase for the Stop Loss, as presented, was made by Councilmember Farmer and seconded by Councilmember Vardeman. Public comment was made by Retiree Russell Smith. Councilmember Fleming expressed his concerns of future higher increases and suggested maintaining some reserve funds for such increases. Ms. Marley stated staff will work diligently to negotiate the lower increases. A vote was taken on the motion on the floor. Motion carried unanimously. SECOND PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO’S APPLICATION OF EXISTING POLICIES REGARDING COMMERCIAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT MORATORIUM AND RELATED MATTERS (Page 87, #2013-12-165) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, (“CITY”) ADOPTING A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT MORATORIUM IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAW UPON PUBLIC HEARING AND ISSUANCE OF WRITTEN FINDINGS; TO EXPIRE NINETY (90) DAYS AFTER THE DATE THE MORATORIUM IS ADOPTED; INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, APPROVAL OF NEW APPLICATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT RELATING TO MOBILE HOMES,


MANUFACTURED HOUSING PARKS AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Councilmember Silvas left the meeting at 10:43 A.M. Responding to a question from Mayor Morrison, Councilmember Fleming stated he had no further questions. Motion, to adopt the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Fleming and seconded by Councilmember Farmer. Motion carried unanimously. Councilmember Silvas returned to the meeting at 10:44 A.M. FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO Z13-37: SKG Engineering AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 17 West 8th Street, located approximately 200 feet west of the intersection of West 8th Street and North Chadbourne Street. This property specifically occupies the Miles Addition, Block 23, Lot 5, in north central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Two-Family Residential (RS-2) to General Commercial (CG) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY Planner Kevin Thomas Boyd presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the Permanent Supplemental Record. Motion, to introduce the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Vardeman and seconded by Councilmember Silvas. AYE: Morrison, Fleming, Self, Silvas, Vardeman, and Wardlaw. NAY: Farmer. Motion carried 5-1.

FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING ABANDONMENTS OF PUBLIC STREETS AND RIGHT-OF-WAYS IN THE FAIRVIEW ADDITION, BLOCK 66, 67 AND 74 IN NORTH CENTRAL SAN ANGELO AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT AND CLOSING OF UNIMPROVED STREETS AND ALLEY SEGMENTS, TO WIT: An 80' wide portion of the unimproved public right-of-way for Florence Street, extending approximately 680' northward from Hughes Street and immediately south of the railroad right-of-way (to include portions of the 100' right-of-way of Hughes Street), an approximately 100' x 270' portion of unimproved public right-of-way of Velma Street - And - a 20' x 430' alley right-of-way in Blocks 66 and 67 and 20' x 35' alley right-of-way in Block 74 of the Fairview Addition, in north central San Angelo; AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE THEREOF TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS; PROVIDING FOR THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ABANDONMENT AND CONVEYANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS Planner Kevin Thomas Boyd presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the Permanent Supplemental Record. General discussion was held on the property and possible use. Public comment was made by Proponent Lee Pfluger. Motion, to introduce the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Vardeman and seconded by Councilmember Fleming. Motion carried unanimously.

Minutes Page 65 December 3, 2013 Vol. 105 FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING ABANDONMENTS OF PUBLIC STREETS AND RIGHT-OF-WAYS IN THE MILES ADDITION BLOCK 32 IN NORTH-CENTRAL SAN ANGELO AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT AND CLOSING OF THE FOLLOWING ALLEY, TO WIT: An approximately 20 foot wide x 495 foot long portion of alley running east to west, perpendicular to Martin Luther King Drive located in Block 32 of the Miles Addition in north-central San Angelo; AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE THEREOF TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS; PROVIDING FOR THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ABANDONMENT AND CONVEYANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS Planner Kevin Thomas Boyd presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the Permanent Supplemental Record. Mr. Boyd stated staff is requesting approval subject to special conditions, specifically sewer/water line access. Motion, to introduce the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Vardeman and seconded by Councilmember Self. Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVAL OF THE 2012 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER) AND AUTHORIZATOIN FOR STAFF TO SEND CAPER TO HUD Neighborhood and Family Services Director Bob Salas presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the Permanent Supplemental Record. Councilmember Farmer left the meeting at 11:00 A.M. General discussion was held on the roof repair program and available grant funds, and the MHMR group homes within neighborhoods and the related zoning classification. Councilmember Farmer returned to the meeting at 10:04 A.M. Motion, to approve the report, as presented, was made by Councilmember Silvas and seconded by Councilmember Vardeman. Motion carried unanimously. AUTHORIZATION FOR STAFF TO NEGOTIATE THE PURCHASE OF A FIRE ENGINE VIA BUY-BOARD PURCHASING COOP FROM HALL MOTORS A FERRARA DEALER, AUTHORIZATION FOR ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASES FROM OTHER VENDORS, IN A TOTAL COMBINED AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $460,000.00, AND AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT AND ANY RELATED DOCUMENTS Assistant Fire Chief Scott Farris presented background information. Motion, to authorize the purchase, as presented, was made by Councilmember Self and seconded by Councilmember Fleming. General discussion was held on the equipment which may be replaced, possibly auctioning or reserving the older vehicle for future use, and housing reserve units at the fire stations. A vote was taken on the motion on the floor. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF A BOARD NOMINATION BY COUNCIL AND DESIGNATED COUNCILMEMBERS: Zoning Board of Adjustment: John Haydn (SMD2) to a 1st term January 2015 Motion, to approve the board nomination by Council and designated Councilmembers, was made by Councilmember Farmer and seconded by Councilmember Silvas. Motion carried unanimously.

RECESS

At 11:12 A.M., Mayor Morrison called a recess.


RECONVENE

At 11:46 A.M., Council reconvened, and the following business was transacted:

EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSION

At 11:46 A.M., Council convened in Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A. Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings be Open, Section 551.071(2) to consult with its attorney on a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with this chapter; Section 551.072 to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property regarding recreational, agricultural and grazing leases and Airport/Mathis Field property; Section 551.074(a)(1) to deliberate the evaluation and duties of the City Manager; and Section 551.087 to discuss an offer of financial or other incentive to Hirschfeld Energy Systems, LLC with whom the City of San Angelo is conducting economic development negotiations and which the City of San Angelo seeks to have, locate, stay or expand in San Angelo.

RECESS

At 12:52 P.M., Mayor Morrison called a recess.

RECONVENE

At 12:59 P.M., Council reconvened, and the following business was transacted: FOLLOW UP AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

CONSIDERATION OF MATTERS DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSION

No action was taken on matters discussed in Executive/Closed Session.

ANNOUNCEMENTS AND CONSIDERATION OF FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Michael Dane distributed the proposed December 17, 2013 Agenda and solicited Council comments and suggestions.

Councilmember Vardeman requested an update on Capital outlay priorities and the ½ sales tax items

Councilmember Farmer requested a report regarding the pros and cons, including associated costs, of adding line item for previous year activity to the Budget Blue Book.

ADJOURNMENT

Motion, to adjourn, was made by Councilmember Farmer and seconded by Councilmember Self. Motion carried unanimously.

The meeting adjourned at 1:02 P.M.

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ___________________________________ Dwain Morrison, Mayor

ATTEST: _______________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

Minutes Page 67 December 3, 2013 Vol. 105 In accordance with Chapter 2, Article 2.300, of the Official Code of the City of San Angelo, the minutes of this meeting consist of the preceding Minute Record and the Supplemental Minute Record. Details on Council meetings may be obtained from the City Clerk’s Office or a video of the entire meeting may be purchased from the Public Information Officer at 481-2727. (Portions of the Supplemental Minute Record video tape recording may be distorted due to equipment malfunction or other uncontrollable factors.)

X:\RK Documents\Bid Documents\2014\2014 Equipment Bids\Agenda Submissions\Background Memo VM-14-13 - Police IT Equipment.docx

Memo

Date: November 27, 2013

To: Councilmembers From: Ryan Kramer, Vehicle Maintenance Subject: Agenda Item for December 17, 2013 Contact: Ryan Kramer, Vehicle Maintenance - 657-4329 x1651 Caption: Consent

Consideration of VM-14-13 Police Computers and Digital Video Equipment, utilizing the State DIR Contract# TX-DIR-SDD-1365, in an amount not to exceed $67,000 from VetSource Mobility and authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute any necessary related documents.

Summary: The Vehicle Maintenance Department solicited quotes for portable computers and digital video equipment for use in new Police and Municipal Court patrol vehicles. History: Quotes were requested for computers and digital video equipment that are to be installed in Police Patrol and Municipal Court vehicles. The equipment brand and model requested is specific so-as to maintain compatibility with existing server hardware and software. A vendor and their submitted pricing, if approved, will be used for additional purchases for ordering equipment throughout the term year. Financial Impact: The City recommends awarding the quote in its entirety to VetSource Mobility through DIR pricing. Purchases will not exceed $67,000 from General Fund capital accounts. Any additional equipment needs exceeding the original amount requested will be presented to council prior to purchase. Related Vision Item: NA Other information/Recommendation: Staff recommends awarding the bid in its entirety to VetSource Mobility (Clarksville, TN) Attachments: Quote Tabulation Reviewed by: Chief Tim Vasquez, Chief of Police

City of San Angelo

Ite

m

Description Esti

mat

ed

Qu

anti

ty

Unit Price

Extended

Price Unit Price Extended Price Unit Price

Extended

Price Unit Price Extended Price

1. Laptop Computer 14 No Quote 3,867.00$ 54,138.00$ 3,739.00$ 52,346.00$

2. Three Year Warranty 14 0 250.00$ 3,500.00$ 230.00$ 3,220.00$

3. Digital Video G-Force Sensors 14 0 238.00$ 3,332.00$ 239.00$ 3,346.00$

4. 1 0 -$

5. 1 0

0 60,970.00$ 58,912.00$ -$

NO BID- Did not submit

VetSource Mobility

BID TABULATION *VM-14-13/Police IT Equipment* November 27, 2013

C I T Y O F S A N A N G E L O

Total Bid

John Wright & Assoc. VisualPro 360

Adopted: 5/30/03 Revised: 6/21/10

City of San Angelo

Memo Date: December 3, 2013

To: Mayor and Councilmembers

From: Cindy M. Preas, Real Estate Administrator (657-4407)

Subject: Agenda Item for December 17, 2013 Council Meeting

Contact: Diana Farris, Property Specialist (657-4407)

Caption: Consent Item

Consideration of adopting a Resolution of the City of San Angelo authorizing the mayor to execute a tax-resale (quitclaim) deed conveying all right, title and interest of the City of San Angelo, and all other taxing units interested in the Tax Foreclosure Judgment or Tax Warrant:

a) 2517 Abilene Street, (Duran), Lot 2, Block 61, Hatcher, $2,100, Suite No. B-11-0178-TAX

b) 136 11th Street, (TSU Properties), Lots 19 & 20, Block 56, Miles, $1,535Suit No. D-12-0160-TAX

c) 407 N Emerson Street, (Deanda), N60’ of Lots 15 & 16, Block 19, Ellis, $3,800, Suit No. C-11-0155--TAX

Summary: The subject properties were auctioned at Sheriff’s Sale. No offers were receivedcausing subject properties to be stuck-off to the City, as Trustee for itself and the other taxing entities.

History: The attached Property Analysis reflects amounts of delinquent taxes, accrued penalties, interest, attorney fees and costs for delinquent years of, together with additional penalties and interest at the rates prescribed by Chapter 33, Tex. Propety

Financial Impact: Upon approval: (1) The City will retain a $500 Administration fee; (2) The balance will be distributed according to the judgment or tax warrant on the Sheriff’s Return; and (3) Property will be reinstated back onto tax roll.

Related Vision Item

(if applicable):

Financial Vision – Examine liquidation of unused or underperforming city-owned properties

Neighborhood Vision – Attract reinvestment

Other Information/ Recommendation:

Staff recommends approval.

Attachments: Property Analysis, Resolution, Tax-Resale Deed and Property Location Map

Presentation: N/A

Publication: N/A

Reviewed by Director:

Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

Approved by Legal:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A TAX-RESALE (QUITCLAIM) DEED CONVEYING ALL RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, AND ALL OTHER TAXING UNITS INTERESTED IN THE TAX FORECLOSURE JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, by Sheriff’s Sale, the properties described below were struck-off to the City of San Angelo, Trustee, pursuant to delinquent tax foreclosure decrees of the 119th, 340th and 391st Judicial Districts, Tom Green County, Texas; and WHEREAS, offers have been made for the purchase of said properties pursuant to Section 34.05, Texas Tax Code Ann.(Vernon, 1982); and

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO that its Mayor, Dwain Morrison, is hereby authorized to execute a Tax-Resale (quitclaim) Deed conveying the following described real properties to the following as specified below, all of the right, title, and interest of the City of San Angelo, and all other taxing units interested in the tax foreclosure judgment, located in San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas: Conveying to: MIGUEL DURAN, single person; ($2,100):

Lot 2, Block 61, Hatcher Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in Volume 816, Page 470, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas. Account #14-26900-0061-002-00

TSU PROPERTIES LLC, Domestic Limited Liability Company (LLC); ($1,535):

Lots 19 and 20, Block 56, Miles Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in a deed recorded in Instrument No. 659215, Official Public Records, Tom Green County, Texas. Account #19-34200-0056-016-00

SALVADOR DEANDA, a single person; ($3,800):

North 60 feet of Lots 15 and 16, Block 19, Ellis Addition, City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas, as described in a deed recorded in Volume 664, Page 55, Official Public Records of Real Property, Tom Green County, Texas. Account #08-21900-0019-018-00

APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF , 2013.

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO

Dwain Morrison, Mayor Attest:

Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Approved As to Content: Approved As to Form:

Cindy M. Preas, Real Estate Administrator Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

City of San Angelo



From: Roger S. Banks, Purchasing Division


Contact: Roger S. Banks, Purchasing Division, (325) 657-5180

Caption: CONSENT Item

Consideration of approving an updated Interlocal Agreement between the City of San Angelo and The Cooperative Purchasing Network (TCPN) authorizing future City purchases as allowed by The State of Texas Government Code, Section 271 and authorizing the Mayor and/or City Manager to execute said Agreement.

Summary: The City of San Angelo has been a member of this TCPN since 2005. This request is seeking approval to update the agreement continue to allow the City of San Angelo to participate in this cooperative purchasing group with other municipalities, county governments, and school districts.

History: The State of Texas Government Code, Section 271 has given municipalities the authority to participate in cooperative purchasing programs to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of local governments by authorizing them to contract, to the greatest possible extent, with one another and with agencies of the state. This authority also satisfies the state law requiring the local government to seek competitive bids. Purchasing Co-ops assist local governments, by pooling procurement resources, meeting the needs of the participants through volume purchasing and by reducing the cost and time associated with individual purchasing procedures. The City of San Angelo currently participates in several purchasing co-ops including the Texas Department of Information Resources (DIR), Houston Galveston Area Council of Governments (HGAC), U.S. Communities, Buyboard.com, etc.

The TCPN is sponsored by the Region VII Education Service Center (ESC4), located in Houston, Texas and is governed by the Region 4 ESC Board of Directors. TCPN is available for use by all schools, colleges, universities, cities, counties, and other government entities in the States of Texas. They offer a wide variety competitive bid services and products to the membership.

Financial Impact: There is no cost relating to membership or purchasing administrative fees associated with TCPN membership. Standard City and State purchasing approval procedures are required for all purchases made using cooperative contracts

Related Vision Item

(if applicable):

NA

Other Information/ Recommendation:

Staff recommends approval

Attachments: 2013 Interlocal Agreement, 2005 Interlocal Agreement

Presentation: None

Publication: NA

Reviewed by Director:

Tina Bunnell, Finance Department,

Approved by Legal: December 2, 2013

City of San Angelo

Memo

Meeting Date: December 3, 2013

To: City Council members

From: Kevin Boyd, Planner

Subject: Z13-37: SKG Engineering, a request for approval of a zone change

from Two-Family Residential (RS-2) to General Commercial (CG) to allow for activities allowed within CG zoning districts shown in Section 310 of the Zoning Ordinance, on the following property:

Location: 17 West 8th Street, located approximately 200 feet west of the

intersection of West 8th Street and North Chadbourne Street; more specifically occupying the Miles Addition, Block 23, Lot 5, in north central San Angelo.

Purpose: Approval of this request would zone the property Two-Family

Residential (RS-2)

Contacts: SKG Engineering, Representative 325-655-1288

Kevin Boyd, Planner 325-657-4210

Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance

amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo

Z13-37: SKG Engineering

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 17 West 8th Street, located approximately 200 feet west of the intersection of West 8th Street and North Chadbourne Street. This property specifically occupies the Miles Addition, Block 23, Lot 5, in north central San Angelo, changing

2

the zoning classification from Two-Family Residential (RS-2) to General Commercial (CG) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

Summary: The City Council may:

(1) Approve the proposed zone change as requested; or (2) Modify the application to some alternative zoning classification believed to be

more appropriate; or

(3) Deny the proposed zone change, altogether.

Recommendation: Planning staff recommends approving the proposed zone

change request from Two-Family Residential (RS-2) to General Commercial (CG). Planning Commission recommended approval of this request by a vote of 6-0 on November 18, 2013.

3

History and Background:

General Information

Existing Zoning: Two-Family Residential (RS-2) Existing Land Use: Vacant, undeveloped tract Surrounding Zoning/Land Use:

North: Two-Family Residential (RS-2) and General Commercial / Heavy Commercial (CG/CH)

Single-family detached housing

West: Two-Family Residential (RS-2) and Office Commercial (CO)

Single-family detached housing, vacant tracts

South: Two-Family Residential (RS-2), Office Commercial (CO) and Heavy Commercial (CH)

Houston Harte Expressway, Window Depot, single-family detach housing and vacant tracts

East: General Commercial / Heavy Commercial (CG/CH) and Heavy Commercial (CH)

Los Magueyes Bakery, Super Uniforms, Brothers Automotive, Val’s Home Appliances Furniture Center, Stripes gas station and vacant tracts

Thoroughfares/Streets: West 18th Street is identified as a "local street",

and is designed to carry light neighborhood traffic at low speeds.

North Chadbourne Street is identified as a "major

arterial street" and is designed to connect collector streets to freeways and other arterials carrying large volumes of traffic at high speeds. Access is secondary and mobility is the primary function of these streets.

Zoning History: The property was annexed within the city prior to

1949. As far back as 1964, the property has been zoned

Two-Family Residential (RS-2). Applicable Regulations: Allowed uses for this property can be found in

Section 310 (Use Table) of the Zoning Ordinance. Development Standards: Nonresidential district standards are outlined in

Section 502.B. of the Zoning Ordinance.

4

All required off-street parking and the connection(s) to a public right-of-way are required to be paved.

Vision Plan Map: Commercial Related Comp Plan Excerpts: “Promote better transition between nearby

commercial and residential use of land and buildings.”

"Require a buffer separating commercial, industrial, or agricultural zoned lands from neighborhoods."

"Establish transition areas to better "scale-down" intensity of use from commercial centers to neighborhoods."

"...slowly reorganize commercial corridors into clusters..."

"Create new physical connections to neighborhoods lined with transitional and intermediate uses."

Special Information

Traffic Concerns: Changing the zoning from residential to commercial is likely to generate additional traffic than if the property remained as-is.

Parking Requirements: Vary depending upon the use of the property, see

Section 511. Parking Provided: No parking exists as the tract remains vacant and

undeveloped at this time. Density: Surrounding properties are low to medium density

residential and commercial in nature. The Vision Plan calls for 'Commercial' type development for the site in question.

Notification Required: Yes Notifications Sent: 11

Responses in Favor: 1

5

Responses in Opposition: 0

Analysis:

In order to approve this zone change request, the City Council members are first required to consider the following criteria: 1. Compatible with Plans and Policies. Whether the proposed amendment is compatible

with the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use policies adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council.

2. Consistent with Zoning Ordinance. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would conflict with any portion of this Zoning Ordinance.

3. Compatible with Surrounding Area. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject land and is the appropriate zoning district for the land.

4. Changed Conditions. Whether and the extent to which there are changed conditions that require an amendment.

5. Effect on Natural Environment. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment, including but not limited to water and air quality, noise, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands and the practical functioning of the natural environment.

6. Community Need. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need.

7. Development Patterns. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in a logical and orderly pattern of urban development in the community.

The staff recommendation is based upon the statements listed below. Staff believes that the proposed zone change meets all of the criteria outlined, thus recommending approval of a zone change to General Commercial (CG). This request is compatible with the city's plans and polices, as the Vision Plan envisions the property and much of the properties to the east to be designated as ‘Commercial’. Additionally, properties to the north as well as the parcel directly to the west are designated to be commercial in nature. The category ‘Commercial’ seeks to provide business and retail related opportunities and fits with CO, CG, and CH zoning, and CN zoning. The long-

6

range plan calls for future commercial development for the area along North Chadbourne Street between Houston Harte Expressway and West 12th Street, several blocks to the north. Although the site is currently zoned residential, the proposed request is more reflective of aspects in the Vision Plan as well as future development patterns for the area. The request is consistent with aspects of the Zoning Ordinance. Although it was stated that they do not have a specific use in mind, they have discussed ideas of having an office building, water or ice sales, or other something that would fall under the allowed uses in the district. The district will introduce a wide range of uses – 'Retail Sales and Services' for example, provides opportunities for personal services, entertainment and product repair or services for consumer and business goods. Examples may include animal grooming, branch banks, restaurants, hotels, offices and convenience stores (Section 315.G, Zoning Ordinance). Some conditional uses allowed in CG zoning include game halls, equipment rental, vehicle repair (full service repair), warehouse and freight movement, waste-related uses and wholesale trade (Section 310, Zoning Ordinance). Some of the more intensive uses permissible in the district are self-service storage facilities, repair-oriented businesses and limited outdoor storage. The district allows for ‘Type 2: Limited Outdoor Storage’, which prohibits outdoor storage to exceed 1,000 square feet or 10 percent of the total site area, whichever is greater – a privacy fence is not required in this circumstance, unless said property abuts a residential zoning district or use (Sections 504 and 509, Zoning Ordinance). While North Chadbourne is clearly defined as a major commercial corridor, much of the 0 Block of West 8th Street is zoned for residential uses. The lot in question, as well as some adjoining lots remain vacant, open space. While much of the lots to the north and west of the property are currently zoned residential, this portion of the block displays a lower density of housing units, characterized by vacant and partially vacant lots. There has been a transition of uses along the block. As a result, the boundary between the zones has become blurred, meaning that it is becoming more difficult to decipher residential properties from those that are commercial. The area already has a good mix of commercial and residential development – at the intersection with North Chadbourne Street is a furniture store, gas station, bakery and specialty clothing store – approval of this request will further solidify the area as part of the nearby commercial corridor. These lots are similar in area and dimension measure roughly 50’ x 100’. A majority of the lots to the north are zoned Two-Family Residential (RS-2), – the property is adjacent to the west is zoned Office Commercial (CO), and Heavy Commercial (CH) immediately east of the site. The proposed CG zoning is an appropriate transition of zoning from CG/CH, CH and CO zoning, within the block (refer to the site map below). This request represents changed conditions to the current Ordinance, in that, RS-2 limits development to residential uses, notably, single-family detached and two-family dwellings (Section 311, Zoning Ordinance). In addition to changing the zoning from

7

residential to commercial, the proposed change will allow for greater allowances in building setbacks, maximum height and a higher FAR ratio. In a CG zone, the required front yard or setback is 25 feet, the side or rear yard varies from 0 – 10 feet, depending on whether or not the property abuts a residential use or zoning district (Section 502, Zoning Ordinance). There is no maximum building height for the district and the Floor Area Ratio, FAR, or maximum buildable space is 2 or twice the total area for the lot. This request is consistent with the commercial designation of the Comprehensive Plan, as such an amendment to the Vision Plan Map of this document is not required to approve this request.

Staff expects that the proposed zone change may have some impact on the natural environment. The change will introduce a wide range of commercial development opportunities, in both scale and type. That being said, potential impacts are greatly tied to the nature of the project – given the allowed uses for the district, such changes will not significant. The site remains a vacant lot, mainly comprised of open space – a number of trees and vegetation exist on the property, the removal of vegetation in developing the tract will have a relatively small impact on the environment. Staff must consider, given the small lot size, 50’ x 100’ or (5,000 sq ft), future plans may trigger future subdivision requests in the area with the means to enlarge the tract to meet greater demands for large scale commercial projects. Conceivably there can be greater storm water runoffs generated from buildings or structures that have larger building footprints. An internal site review will be conducted by city staff will ensure that any approved project directs runoff away from neighboring properties or require effective screening. The requested zoning represents a community need. Vacant and abandoned homes left unmaintained is a dangerous combination and serves as potential blight in the community, as demolition of such structures can generate an improved quality of living for residents of surrounding properties. The proponent’s decision to rezone the property to something more practical is a conscious step in revitalizing that section of the block. The site boasts close proximity to major roadways and commercial development; the request cleans up and offers a nice transition between existing zoning. The site is within 200 feet of North Chadbourne Street, which is identified as a minor arterial. Houston Harte Expressway is also very accessible from the site. The requested zone change and proposed development will offer suitable infill opportunities for the tract of land that has serve as vacant, open space for many years. It will also enable development which provides a buffer between uses, a transition from neighborhood serving commercial to nearby residential uses and zoning. The location also provides close proximity to shops and other services, such a transition stimulates the environment for walkable communities. The presence of mix uses within a confined space reduces the demand for automobile use and enhances the nature of the area - further creating places where people can live, shop and work, thus establishing sustainable environments.

8

Proposed Conditions

N/A

Attachments: Excerpt from zoning map, showing the general location within

the City of San Angelo; Excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property; Aerial photo, highlighting subject property; Excerpt from the comprehensive plan vision map highlighting

the subject property; Excerpt of the favor/opposition notification map; Citizen Response; Draft minutes from 11/18/13 Planning Commission Meeting;

and Draft Ordinance.

Presentation: Kevin Boyd, Planner

Reviewed by: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner (11/8/13)

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: 17 West 8th Street, located approximately 200 feet west of the intersection of West 8th Street and North Chadbourne Street. This property specifically occupies the Miles Addition, Block 23, Lot 5, in north central San Angelo, changing the zoning classification from Two-Family Residential (RS-2) to General Commercial (CG) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

RE: Z 13-37: SKG Engineering

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing

body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out herein; NOW THEREFORE,

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:

SECTION 1: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted

by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 17 West 8th Street, located approximately 200 feet west of the intersection of West 8th Street and North Chadbourne Street. This property specifically occupies the Miles Addition, Block 23, Lot 5, in north central San Angelo, shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: General Commercial (CG) District.

The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning.

SECTION 2: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described

property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.

SECTION 3: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment: SEVERABILITY:

The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 4: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment:

PENALTY: Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense.

INTRODUCED on the 3rd day of December, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this the 17th day of December, 2013.

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO

____________________________________

Dwain Morrison, Mayor

ATTEST:

________________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

Approved As To Content: Approved As To Form: _________________________ ________________________ AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

City of San Angelo

Memo



From: Kevin Boyd, Planner

Subject: Street and alley abandonment request, Fairview Addition Block 66,

67 and 74, a request for abandonment of the following properties:

Location: An 80' wide portion of the unimproved public right-of-way for Florence

Street, extending approximately 680' northward from Hughes Street and immediately south of the railroad right-of-way (to include portions of the 100' right-of-way of Hughes Street), an approximately 100' x 270' portion of unimproved public right-of-way of Velma Street - And - a 20' x 430' alley right-of-way in Blocks 66 and 67 and 20' x 35' alley right-of-way in Block 74 of the Fairview Addition, in north central San Angelo.

Contacts: Southwest Orient Properties LLC, Owner 325-944-4444

Kevin Boyd, Planner 325-657-4210

Caption: First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance

authorizing abandonments of public streets and right-of-ways in the Fairview Addition, Block 66, 67 and 74 in north central San Angelo

AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT AND

CLOSING OF UNIMPROVED STREETS AND ALLEY SEGEMENTS, TO WIT: An 80' wide portion of the unimproved public right-of-way for Florence Street, extending approximately 680' northward from Hughes Street and immediately south of the railroad right-of-way (to include portions of the 100' right-of-way of Hughes Street), an approximately 100' x 270' portion of unimproved public right-of-way of Velma Street - And - a 20' x 430' alley right-of-way in Blocks 66 and 67 and 20' x 35' alley right-of-way in Block 74 of the Fairview Addition, in north central San Angelo; AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE THEREOF TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS; PROVIDING FOR THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ABANDONMENT AND CONVEYANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE

MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS


1) Approve the proposed abandonment; or

2) Approve the proposed abandonment subject to conditions; or

3) Deny the proposed abandonment.

Recommendation: City staff recommends approving, subject to conditions

mentioned in this report. Planning Commission recommended approval of this request by a vote of 6-0 on November 18, 2013.


Last month, the applicants, Southwest Orient Properties, LLC., filed a request to formally abandon the a series of adjoining alleys in the Fairview Addition, Blocks 66, 67 and 74, in north central San Angelo. The immediate area is sandwiched between two rail crossings – one terminates slightly pass the site, to the south, the other is a major rail line that runs across town (across South Bryant Blvd, Knickerbocker Rd and the Loop) and transports freight into the city from the east and west. Close proximity of the rail lines has had a dramatic impact on development in the surrounding area which is a mix of heavy industrial and agricultural land uses. The presence of the railways allow for easy transporting of goods. More specifically, the proposed alleyway runs laterally to the north of Culwell Street. Much of it will be the abandoning of Hughes Street, Florence Street and Velma Street, which spans roughly 680', also in the request to be abandoned is a roughly 20' x 430' alley right-of-way in Blocks 66 and 67 of the Fairview Addition and 20' x 35' alley right-of-way in Block 74 of the Fairview Addition. It area is quite sizeable and measures slightly more than 75,500 square feet. Whenever an alley is officially abandoned, it is divided at the centerpoint and deeded to the adjacent property owners – since the proponent owns much of the adjoining area on either side of the proposed abandonment, if approved and all measures are carried out, much of the abandoned sections will be handed over to the proponent.

General Information

Existing Zoning: Heavy Manufacturing (MH) Existing Land Use: Southwest Orient Properties, LLC. Surrounding Zoning/Land Use:

North: Heavy Manufacturing (MH) Open land

West: Heavy Manufacturing (MH) Bollman Industries (livestock)

South: Heavy Manufacturing (MH) Acme Iron & Metal Co. (strap yard), Zafiro Bar and Clark's Auto Parts and Wrecker Service

East: Heavy Manufacturing (MH) San Angelo Packing Company Warehouse, Republic Services (waste management and recycling services)

Storm Water/Drainage: Abandoning the alley is not expected to affect drainage in the area.

Topography: Abandoning the alley is not expected to change

the topography of the area. Water/Sewer Utilities: Water Utilities is requesting for a 20' utility and

access easement for the existing water line on the property. The access easement will need to extend from the water line to Hughes right-of-way.

Fire Protection: Abandoning the alley is not expected to affect fire

protection in the area. Access Management: Abandoning the alley is not expected to affect

access management in the area. Notification required: Yes Notifications Sent: 7 Received In favor 0 Received in opposition 0

Special Information

Private Utilities: N/A

Basis for Recommendation

After an internal review of the site, staff finds that there is no real interest in maintaining the requested unimproved street right-of-ways and alleyways. The portions of Hughes Street, Florence Street and Velma Street right-of-ways do not appear to have ever been improved (paved to street specifications) or fully utilized as a street, at any point in time. Currently the proponents, Southwest Orient Properties, LLC., has utilized the site with their operations for quite some time. The triangular shaped tract, bounded by both sides by the railroad tracts, makes serious development of site impractical - the odd configuration of the site restricts future land development of the area. With the exception of a water line that extends slightly within the right-of-way of unimproved Velma Street, no other public utility exist within the identified area. In reviewing the nature of this request, staff has uncovered series abandonments that has occurred in the generalized area between North Bell Street and the westernmost point of the tracts, over the past few years. Approvals of such abandonments, including the abandoned portion situated immediately to the west of the site, further solidify the city's need to relinquish the rights of the specified area. Additionally, abandonment will not negatively impact the accessibility of nearby and adjacent streets and is compatible with aspects of the Thoroughfare Plan for the area.

Given the circumstances outlined, it would be more beneficial for the city to relinquish ownership of the identified properties. With abandoning of these sections, staff is requesting that a 20' utility and access easement be required with approval and extend to the Hughes Street right-of-way to allow for city access to the existing water line along Velma Street.

Proposed Conditions

1. Provide a survey and metes and bounds decsription of the property to be abandoned, performed under the direction of a registered professional land surveyor.

2. City Water Utilities requires a 20' utility and access easement for the existing water

line on the property. The access easement will need to extend from the water line to Hughes Street right-of-way.

3. Replatting the property abandoned and adjacent to the abandonment into one contiguous lot.

Attachments: Excerpt from zoning map, showing the general location within

the City of San Angelo; Excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property; Aerial photo, highlighting subject property; Original plat of the Fairview Addition from 1906; Existing water and sewer lines in the area; and Water Utilities site comments on survey.

Presentation: Kevin Boyd, Planner

Reviewed by: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner (11/08/13)

City of San

Angelo

Memo



From: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner

Subject: A request to abandon a segment of alley right-of-way on the following

property:

Property: An approximately 20 foot wide x 490 foot long portion of alley running

east to west, parallel to and in-between West 8th Street & West 9th Street, bounded to the east by Martin Luther King Drive. This alleyway is shown on the plat document of the Miles Addition, Block 32, in north-central San Angelo.

Purpose: Approval would formally close the alleyway.

Contacts: Charity Vasquez, SAISD 947-3759

Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner 657-4210

Caption: AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT AND CLOSING OF THE FOLLOWING ALLEY, TO WIT: An approximately 20 foot wide x 495 foot long portion of alley running east to west, perpendicular to Martin Luther King Drive located in Block 32 of the Miles Addition in north-central San Angelo; AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE THEREOF TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS; PROVIDING FOR THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ABANDONMENT AND CONVEYANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS.


(1) Approve the proposed abandonment;

(2) Modify of the abandonment conditions to those believed to be more appropriate; or (3) Deny the proposed abandonment.

Recommendation: City staff recommends approving the proposed abandonment,

subject to conditions outlined in this staff report. Planning Commission recommended approval 6-0 on the Consent Agenda at the November 18, 2013 meeting.


General Information

Existing Zoning: Two-Family Residential (RS-2) Existing Land Use: Alley lies between buildings on the Carver school

site and is currently unimproved Surrounding Zoning/Land Use:

North: RS-2 School Building

West: RS-2 North Bryant Boulevard

South: RS-2 School Building East: RS-2 Martin Luther King Drive

Storm Water/Drainage: The abandonment is not expected to create any

drainage issues. Topography: Abandonment of the right-of-way is not expected

to generate any elevation problems or issues. Water/Sewer Utilities: Requires a 20' open and unobstructed utility

easement be reserved in this alleyway to provide future access to facilities.

Fire Protection: No Fire Access issues are expected to be

generated as a result of this abandonment. Access Management: No access management issues are anticipated as

a result of this abandonment. Notification Required: Yes Notifications Sent: 18

Responses in Favor: 0

Responses in Opposition: 0

Special Information

Private Utilities: This abandonment is not anticipated to create any

concerns for private utilities

Traffic Concerns: Traffic patterns for this area should remain unaffected. This

portion of alley has never been improved and the individual lots served by this alleyway are all owned by the proponent of this particular request.

Rationale for staff's recommendation:

This alleyway has effectively been closed for years. It is un-improved at this time and several trees hinder anyone from actually travelling through this alleyway. The site is surrounded by SAISD property, and the actual alleyway is home to a water and sewer line. Essentially nothing is being gained for the public's benefit for the City to be maintaining this alleyway as a public right-of-way. It would be the best use of the property for it to be abandoned and encompassed by the SAISD which owns property on both sides of the alleyway. As such, SAISD would effectively own the entire Block 32 of the Miles Addition. The only requirement is that an easement be maintained where the current alleyway runs to allow for access and maintenance of the existing water and sewer line currently running in this alleyway.

Proposed Conditions

1. Reservation of a 20' open and unobstructed utility easement (where the alleyway currently runs) to access and maintain existing water utilities facilities.

Attachments: excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property;

aerial photo, highlighting subject property; and draft ordinance.

Presentation: Jeff Hintz, Interim Senior Planner

AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE ABANDONMENT AND CLOSING OF THE FOLLOWING ALLEY, TO WIT: An approximately 20 foot wide x 495 foot long portion of alley running east to west, perpendicular to Martin Luther King Drive located in Block 32 of the Miles Addition in north-central San Angelo; AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE THEREOF TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS; PROVIDING FOR THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ABANDONMENT AND CONVEYANCE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS

RE: abandonment of a public right-of-way being an approximately 20 foot wide x 495 foot long portion of alley running east to west, perpendicular to Martin Luther King Drive located in Block 32 of the Miles Addition

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas, acting pursuant to law, deems it advisable to abandon and convey the hereinafter described tract of land to the abutting property owner and is of the opinion that said land is not needed for public use, and that same should be abandoned and quit claimed to the abutting property owner as hereinafter provided; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas is of the opinion that the best interest and welfare of the public will be served by abandoning and conveying same to the abutting property owner, subject to conditions and restrictions contained herein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO: 1. That the following described tract in the City of San Angelo, Tom Green County,

Texas be and the same is hereby abandoned, vacated and closed insofar as the right, title and easement of the public are concerned; subject, however, to the conditions and restrictions hereinafter more fully set out:

BEING the entire 20 foot width and approximately 495 foot length of right-of-way

for a public alley running east to west, perpendicular to Martin Luther King Drive located in Block 32 of the Miles Addition in north-central San Angelo, which said alley is described more particularly as follows:

BEGINNING at a point on southeast corner of the Miles Addition, Block 32, Lot 1 THENCE in a southerly direction a distance of approximately 20 feet to the northeast corner of the Miles Addition, Block 32, Lot 20; THENCE in an westerly direction a distance of approximately 495 feet; THENCE in an northerly direction a distance of 20 feet; THENCE in an easterly direction a distance of approximately 495 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

2. That the abandonment and conveyance provided for herein is made and accepted

subject to all present zoning and deed restrictions, if the latter exist, and all existing easements, if any, whether apparent or non-apparent, aerial, surface, underground or otherwise.

3. That the abandonment and conveyance provided for herein shall extend only to the

public right, title, easement and interest and shall be construed to extend only to the interest which the governing body for the City of San Angelo may legally and lawfully abandon and vacate.

4. That the Mayor of the City of San Angelo is hereby authorized to execute and deliver

a quit claim deed conveying the above-described tract to the abutting property owner.

5. That the terms and conditions contained in this ordinance shall be binding upon

Grantees and assigns. 6. That the Grantees shall pay all reasonable costs associated with procedures

necessitated by the request to abandon this public right-of-way. 7. That a 20 foot open and unobstructed easement be reserved as a utility easement

where the current alleyway currently runs. INTRODUCED on the 3rd day of December, 2013 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON this the 17th day of December, 2013. CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS ATTEST: by: ______________________________ by: ______________________________

Dwain Morrison, Mayor Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

Approved As To Content: Approved As To Form: _________________________ ________________________ AJ Fawver, Planning Manager Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

SAN ANGELO CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU 3rd Quarter Report

July - September, 2013

1. Convention Activities …………………………..........……. 1 - 9

2. Financials …………………………………..........…………10 - 13

3. Marketing & Promotions..…………..........………………..14 - 19

4. Visitor Statistics …………………..........…................……20 - 24

Convention South Banner Ad July, 2013

TEXAS MONTHLY July, 2013

September: Lily Fest * Archaeology Fair

October: Art-Ober-Fest * ASU Homecoming

Riverfest * Color Run 5K Roping Fiesta Texas Forts Tour Bike Ride

Fort Concho NightTours & Halloween

November:Chicken Farm Art Center Open House

For these and other events contact: WWW.VISITSANANGELO.ORG

1-800-375-1206

These are a few of OUR FAVORITE THINGS

2013 Fall Ad.indd 1 5/20/2013 2:24:34 PM

TEXAS MONTHLY June/July, 2013

Smith Travel Report

Comparative September 2012/2013

Percent Change from September 2012

2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 Occ ADR RevPAR Room Rev Room Avail Room Sold

San Angelo+ 74.1 79.6 115.25 82.20 85.45 65.46 -6.9 40.2 30.5 30.5 0.0 -6.9

Abilene+ 52.3 50.5 74.53 73.93 38.95 37.36 3.4 0.8 4.2 4.2 0.0 3.4

Midland+ 59.5 67.9 145.93 144.90 86.87 98.37 -12.3 0.7 -11.7 -3.5 9.3 -4.2

Odessa+ 64.7 81.1 130.71 137.00 84.52 111.16 -20.3 -4.6 -24.0 -10.2 18.1 -5.9

Lubbock+ 66.7 61.0 94.39 83.84 62.95 51.13 9.4 12.6 23.1 21.5 -1.3 7.9

Kerrville+ 48.0 45.0 75.37 74.91 36.18 33.69 6.7 0.6 7.4 7.4 0.0 6.7

Amarillo+ 62.2 56.7 69.52 67.66 43.23 38.37 9.6 2.7 12.7 14.4 1.6 11.4

Wichita Falls+ 47.0 44.3 68.95 65.48 32.41 29.04 6.0 5.3 11.6 7.2 -3.9 1.8

Killeen+ 51.5 57.5 67.81 68.72 34.90 39.48 -10.4 -1.3 -11.6 -12.0 -0.4 -10.8

Longview+ 47.8 49.7 67.38 67.36 32.18 33.50 -3.9 0.0 -3.9 -0.0 4.0 -0.1

Percent Change from YTD 2012

2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 Occ ADR RevPAR Room Rev Room Avail Room Sold

San Angelo+ 77.1 74.6 100.57 77.83 77.55 58.10 3.3 29.2 33.5 33.5 0.0 3.3

Abilene+ 56.4 53.8 75.04 73.99 42.29 39.81 4.7 1.4 6.2 6.2 -0.1 4.7

Midland+ 60.3 74.8 145.37 124.03 87.63 92.76 -19.4 17.2 -5.5 2.6 8.6 -12.5

Odessa+ 68.5 85.1 134.35 121.37 92.03 103.25 -19.5 10.7 -10.9 0.0 12.2 -9.6

Lubbock+ 67.4 63.8 83.03 77.04 55.95 49.12 5.7 7.8 13.9 11.3 -2.3 3.3

Kerrville+ 51.9 46.9 76.94 76.09 39.93 35.66 10.7 1.1 12.0 12.0 0.0 10.7

Amarillo+ 63.4 60.3 70.87 69.51 44.91 41.91 5.1 2.0 7.2 10.6 3.2 8.4

Wichita Falls+ 51.3 48.8 67.58 65.50 34.66 31.97 5.1 3.2 8.4 4.5 -3.6 1.3

Killeen+ 58.7 62.9 68.43 69.42 40.19 43.65 -6.6 -1.4 -7.9 -7.3 0.7 -6.0

Longview+ 54.0 54.8 66.54 65.42 35.92 35.84 -1.4 1.7 0.2 2.9 2.7 1.2

Census Sample Census Sample

San Angelo+ 24 18 1956 1533

Abilene+ 43 27 3361 2255

Midland+ 38 23 3351 2506

Odessa+ 38 22 3133 2289

Lubbock+ 57 38 5006 3566

Kerrville+ 14 10 1092 864

Amarillo+ 70 45 6091 4467

Wichita Falls+ 27 21 2238 1792

Killeen+ 33 19 2269 1591

Longview+ 37 22 2531 1600

Current Month - September 2013 vs September 2012

RevPARADROcc %

Year to Date - September 2013 vs September 2012

RoomsProperties

Participation

RevPARADROcc %

San Angelo Visitor Center

Statistics - 3rd Quarter 2013

Texas City # of visitors # of days stay Texas City # of visitors # of days stay

San Antonio 163 2 Carthage 38 3Midland 161 8 Bridgeport 37 2Odessa 160 2 Boerne 34 2Abilene 154 1 Pecos 34 3Marble Falls 154 3 Kerrville 31 1Houston 147 3 Orange Grove 30 4Austin 124 2 Arlington 30 2Lubbock 117 2 Kingsland 30 4Fort Worth 107 2 Cedar Park 28 3El Paso 78 3 Brownwood 28 2Poolville 70 4 Brownsville 26 2Dallas 56 4 Killeen 25 4Big Spring 55 2 Amarillo 25 1Odem 49 3 Laredo 24 3Schertz 48 2 Sonora 24 3Waco 48 3 Iowa Park 23 2Rio Vista 45 4 Mansfield 23 4Del Rio 44 2 Brady 23 1Friona 41 3 Weatherford 22 2Corpus Christi 38 3 Lorena 21 4Comfort 20 4 Aledo 13 3Paint Rock 20 4 Mission 13 3Wichita Falls 20 3 Graford 13 2Lipan 20 4 Stephenville 13 2Round Rock 20 2 Denver City 12 2Buda 19 4 Commerce 12 4New Braunfels 19 2 Spring 12 1Marion 18 4 Addison 12 2Livingston 16 3 Sweetwater 12 1Waller 16 2 Tomball 12 2Burnet 16 2 Snyder 11 1Riomedina 16 2 Wimberley 11 4Ballinger 16 2 La Feria 11 4Seminole 15 3 Lamesa 11 2Hutto 15 2 Mason 11 2Baytown 15 3 Early 11 3Leander 15 3 De Leon 10 4Harlingen 15 2 Crane 10 4Helotes 14 2 Spring Branch 10 2Lytle 13 2 Comstock 10 4Humble 10 2 Bangs 9 3Bluff Dale 10 4 China Spring 9 4Taylor 10 4 Lewisville 9 2Edinburg 10 3 Tyler 9 2Midlothian 10 4 Cleburne 9 2




Fredericksburg 10 2 Victoria 9 2Atlanta 10 3 Alamo 9 4Frisco 10 2 Muleshoe 8 2Granbury 10 2 Bastrop 8 3Alice 10 4 Harker Heights 8 3Winters 10 3 Bryan 8 4Mertzon 10 1 Andrews 8 1Castroville 10 4 Euless 8 3Caddo Mills 10 4 Fabens 8 2Rochelle 10 3 Bronte 8 1Round Mountain 10 4 Seagraves 8 3Carrizo Springs 10 4 Yoakum 8 4Canyon 10 4 Hawley 8 4Seguin 9 2 Hebbronville 8 4Big Lake 9 1 San Benito 8 3Georgetown 7 1 Lyford 6 4Pearland 7 4 Chico 6 2Fort Stockton 7 2 Athens 6 4Richmond 7 3 Floydada 6 4Cameron 7 4 Iraan 6 3Eldorado 7 2 Harper 6 2Hereford 7 2 Katy 6 4De Soto 7 4 Cedar Creek 6 4Deer Park 7 3 Pampa 6 2Alpine 7 2 Mineral Wells 6 2Kingsville 7 5 Dripping Springs 6 1Liberty Hill 7 2 Mc Camey 6 4Cibolo 6 2 Bovina 6 3Junction 6 2 Haslet 6 2Miles 6 2 Ranger 6 2Texarkana 6 4 Dickinson 6 4Three Rivers 6 3 Pittsburg 6 4Slaton 6 3 Roscoe 5 1Tolar 6 3 Lampasas 5 2Sandy 6 2 Rowena 5 1San Elizario 5 3 Clyde 5 2Ingram 5 1 Eastland 5 1Adrian 5 1 Blanco 4 2Hamilton 5 4 Charlotte 4 4Temple 5 2 Colorado City 4 1Carrollton 5 5 Cisco 4 2Floresville 5 30 Cross Plains 4 3Orange 5 3 Bedford 4 2Llano 5 1 Darrouzett 4 2Missouri City 5 3 Alvarado 4 3




Salado 5 3 Dublin 4 2Plano 5 2 Greenville 4 3Belton 5 76 Granger 4 2Ozona 5 1 Anson 4 1Barnhart 5 1 Balmorhea 4 2Borger 5 2 Gary 4 14Converse 5 3 Gouldbusk 4 14Farmersville 5 4 Arp 4 4Galveston 5 1 Goldthwaite 4 3College Station 5 3 Decatur 4 1Moulton 4 1 Pyote 4 1Stanton 4 2 Colleyville 3 1Lott 4 2 McKinney 3 2Sugarland 4 2 Driftwood 3 1Rocksprings 4 4 Sealy 3 4Van Alstyne 4 2 Springtown 3 3Marshall 4 3 Coahoma 3 4Morton 4 2 Clifton 3 3Nacogdoches 4 4 El Paso 3 2League City 4 3 Melissa 3 2Navasota 4 4 Coleman 3 1Needville 4 1 Brenham 3 4Waxahachie 4 2 Montgomery 3 1Newcastle 4 4 Midkiff 3 1Jacksonville 4 6 Dimmitt 3 2Richardson 4 2 Claude 3 2Port Lavaca 4 1 Caldwell 3 4Huntsville 4 2 Sheffield 3 1Irving 4 4 Coppell 3 4Portland 4 2 Progreso 3 4Paige 3 1 Cayuga 2 2San Saba 3 3 Roanoke 2 2Alvin 3 2 Chester 2 2Uvalde 3 2 Webster 2 4Albert 3 1 West 2 1Angleton 3 1 Albany 2 1Lindale 3 4 Whitney 2 7Levelland 3 3 Afton 2 2Zapata 3 5 Port Isabel 2 1Barksdale 3 3 Wylie 2 2Bandera 3 3 Princeton 2 1Adkins 3 2 Thrall 2 1Loop 3 5 Bellaire 2 4Bay City 3 2 Stratford 2 1La Vernia 3 2 Beaumont 2 2




Wallis 3 2 Tarpley 2 1Forney 3 2 Brackettville 2 4Yorktown 3 4 Breckenridge 2 2Sterling City 3 1 Santa Rosa 2 3Refugio 2 4 Brookshire 2 4Van Horn 2 3 Gonzales 2 1Rockwall 2 7 Mesquite 2 1Wall 2 1 Denton 2 2Azle 2 2 Menard 2 3Buffalo Gap 2 1 Devine 2 1Burleson 2 1 Memphis 2 4Rockdale 2 2 Pleasanton 2 2Star 2 2 Littlefield 2 5Robert Lee 2 1 Falfurrias 2 4Shallowater 2 2 Marlin 2 4Vidor 2 1 George West 2 2Tatum 2 5 Manor 2 1Edcouch 2 4 Lohn 2 1Medina 2 1 Garland 2 3Diana 2 2 Little River 2 1Lopeno 2 3 Conroe 2 2Dime Box 2 1 Hurst 2 3Mineola 2 1 Hawkins 2 1Grandbury 2 1 Hermleigh 2 2Grand Prairie 2 3 Mingus 2 1La Coste 2 1 Whiteface 1 1Kennedale 2 2 Allen 1 1Copperas Cove 2 2 Weslaco 1 4Pilot Point 2 2 Kirbyville 1 4Plains 2 1 Grapevine 1 4Daingerfield 2 4 Lancaster 1 3Plainview 2 2 Groves 1 1Jefferson 2 7 Wiergate 1 2Crawford 2 3 Centerville 1 30Gilmer 1 3 Carlsbad 1 1Baird 1 1 Cypress 1 2Hewitt 1 3 Rice 1 3Holland 1 3 Rhome 1 4Tahoka 1 4 Cumby 1 2Terlingua 1 2 Evant 1 4Glen Rose 1 4 Rankin 1 1Universal City 1 4 Monahans 1 3Henderson 1 4 Rainbow 1 1Lexington 1 1 Cresson 1 10Kemah 1 3 Parker 1 3




Christoval 1 1 Los Fresnos 1 4Corinth 1 4 Port Aransas 1 1Pasadena 1 4 Rosenberg 1 1Olton 1 1Earth 1 4Lueders 1 4Manchaca 1 2Flower Mound 1 1Stamford 1 4 TOTAL # Visits TOTAL # Visitors

Mc Allen 1 3 1264 4169

Edna 1 1Canton 1 1Seabrook 1 1 TOTAL Visitors International and States

Robstown 1 4 4992

Sanderson 1 2 TOP 3 Countries Top 3 States

Brownfield 1 1 Mexico Oklahoma

Dumas 1 1 Canada California

Royse City 1 3 Germany New Mexico

SAN ANGELO CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU 4th Quarter Report

October - December, 2013

1. Convention Activities - 3rd/4th Quarter Cumulative .......... 1

2. Convention Activities …………………………..........……. 2 - 6

3. Financials …………………………………..........………… 7 - 10

4. Marketing & Promotions..…………..........……………….. 11 - 14

MIDWEST LIVING JANUARY 2014 1/3 pg

TEXAS MONTHLY

DECEMBER, 2013 1/3 PG

11

TEXAS HIGHWAYS DECEMBER, 2013 1/3 pg

AAA SOUTHERN TRAVELER JAN-FEB, 2014

13

City of San Angelo

Memo Meeting Date: December 17, 2013

To: Mayor & City Council members

From: AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services

Subject: Discussion of handling existing parks

Contacts: AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services 657-4210 Caption: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING STRATEGIES

FOR OBTAINING COMPLIANCE WITH ZONING ORDINANCE FOR EXISTING PARKS AROUND SAN ANGELO CONTAINING RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, MANUFACTURED HOUSING, AND MOBILE HOMES

Summary: In response to the continuing discussions of recreational vehicles (RVs), mobile homes, and manufactured homes, and in the interest of developing an enforcement strategy to deal with an influx in these structures as a result of the Cline Shale play, City staff researched every existing "park" within the city limits. As part of this research, they looked at the following characteristics of each:

• acreage; • approximate number of existing spaces; • approximate number of structures and their classifications; • how the park came to exist, from a regulatory standpoint; and • strategies to bring all parks into compliance under a singular approach.

Breakdown of Existing Parks There appear to be 18 parks currently in existence within the city limits & the surrounding ETJ. Of these 18, 2 carry the zoning classification of MHP (Manufactured Housing Park), an existing zoning district provided for within the Zoning Ordinance, adopted in 2000. (The next section addresses what MHP zoning allows and its associated requirements.) Of the remaining 16 parks, 2 lie within approved Planned Development (PD) districts. 1 park was in existence prior to the adoption of the first Zoning Ordinance in 1954, and 2 were in existence prior to their annexation into the city, meaning that these three are legally nonconforming. 4 of those 16 have an approved special permit in place allowing specifically "mobile homes", not RVs. 3 are outside the city limits, in the ETJ, and the remaining 3 have long existed, though staff could not locate any approvals or explanation as how they came to be allowed in the first place. The MHP Zoning District The MHP Zoning District is: "intended to provide opportunities for development of land with improvements and utilities specifically for the accommodation of manufactured housing in projects under unified management and control. These parks may include other services and common facilities for use by the residents. Any MHP district may include more than one manufactured housing park as long as each park within the district is under unified management and control." Section 310.E of the Zoning Ordinance allows the following uses within MHP zoning:

• Household Living - by right; • Parks & Open Areas - by right; • Community Services - as a Conditional Use; • Telecommunications Facilities - as a Conditional Use; • Golf Courses - as a Special Use; • Campground/Recreational Vehicle Parks - as a Special Use.

The only building types allowed in MHP zoning are manufactured homes and mobile homes. The minimum land area required is three acres, with a maximum density of 8 dwelling units per acre. There are required setback standards between dwellings (10 feet), a dwelling and buildings serving the entire park (15 feet), a dwelling and the edge of pavement (10 feet), and a dwelling and the park boundary (20 feet). Two parking spaces are required for each dwelling, as is skirting. Dwellings may be no further than 500 feet away from a fire hydrant, and a site plan approval is required for any new development. Mobile homes are also allowed for placement within MHP zones, subject to these same aforementioned conditions. Recreational vehicles are also allowed for placement - for permanent living - within this zoning district. There is, however, a limit to the number of RV units which can be placed within these, outlined in Section 413.C.3: "3. Exceptions Travel trailers, motorized recreational vehicles and other such relocatable housing that does not meet the definition of either a "mobile home" or of "manufactured housing" may be occupied within a manufactured housing park, provided these types of accommodations do not exceed 30 percent of the total units in the park."

Possible Approach for Compliance In order to create equity and a consistent set of standards for these parks currently in existence - staff examined mechanisms already provided for within the current ordinance. It is clear that there are compliance issues - with the existing special permit ordinances, which allow specifically for mobile home placement only; with the movement of additional RV units into parks which do not carry with them an allowance for 30% RV placement; and, with the difficulty of enforcing regulations which vary from park to park. As such, staff attempted to find a way to streamline the regulations for all parks, while allowing for some RV placement within the boundaries of these parks as they exist - directly addressing any demand for such. While the current ordinance does address "campground/RV parks", it does not address them for the purposes of living quarters. Special permits are long-defunct mechanisms for which a process no longer exists. However, MHP zoning currently provided for in the ordinance allows placement of all three types of structures. Therefore, it appears the obvious possibility is to ask the City Council to consider initiation of a rezoning of all existing parks to MHP zoning. This approach would bring equity to the requirements for the parks, while limiting the placement of RVs to a minority of the parks - which appears to directly respond to some of the concerns raised about RVs moving into the city. It would also legitimize parks for which no documentation can be produced about the initial approval for their placement. This solution is not without some difficulties, however, based on the following facts:

• 3 of the 15 parks within the current city limits have acreage smaller than the minimum three acres, and would be in violation of this provision.

• Remember that MHP zoning, as discussed on the previous page, only allows for

30% of the total number of units to be RVs. With this current standard, 5 of the existing parks would be in violation.

• Also, remember that MHP zoning only allows for a maximum of 8 units per acre.

There are 3 parks which already have more units than the maximum density requirement would allow.

On a side note: the Zoning Board of Adjustment, a board who follows criteria outlined in state law, hears request for variances, or deviations from the minimum numerical standards. Variance requests are evaluated from a perspective of uniqueness and equity, among other factors. Also, if the number of manufactured housing units within a park increased, the 30% threshold would increase with it. Lastly, these standards may be a consideration of the housing committee and decision-making bodies moving forward as they examine the rules currently in place. Question for Council consideration City staff is looking to the Council for guidance as to how to proceed with enforcement of regulations, while recognizing the "patchwork" of different approval types - or lack thereof - which led to the parks in existence today is a complicating factor.

Attachments: N/A Reviewed by: AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services

City of San Angelo

Memo Meeting Date: December 17, 2013

To: Mayor and City Council members

From: AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services

Subject: Permission to execute contract, with terms previously agreed upon by Council, with top ranked consulting group in response to PL-01-12

Contacts: AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services 657-4210 Captions:

DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACCEPTANCE OF DOWNTOWN MASTER DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES DOCUMENT PREPARED BY CATALYST URBAN DEVELOPMENT AS PART OF CED 05-11

Summary: The final document prepared by Catalyst Urban Development as part of their contract with the City of San Angelo, is being presented for acceptance by the City Council. This is Task 1.9 of Phase 1 of the project and will close out this contract. Secondly, as per the contract, Catalyst cannot proceed into Phase 2 without approval from the City Council. As such, staff is also seeking direction from Council regarding proceeding into Phase 2.

Background:

Discussion & Possible Acceptance Item:

In a joint session with the Downtown Development Commission on December 18, 2012, the members from both bodies heard a presentation by Paris Rutherford with Catalyst Urban Development and held discussion, after which the Council formally

accepted the DDC's recommendation to approve the proposed scope, the Letter of Intent (with the understanding that staff will present each Phase [1-4] for City Council's review and approval for further direction), and authorized staff to negotiate a contract with the terms from the earlier presentation, and to include the identification of funding sources. Catalyst Urban Development revised the Letter of Intent to include the approval between each phase by the City Council. They also submitted a draft contract, which has been reviewed, amended, discussed, and approved by the City Attorney's office, and which is attached to this report. Conference calls and meetings were held between various City staff and Catalyst to work through insurance requirements, contract structuring, and other related matters. The finished product, including land analysis, market-based programming, policy context, ownership evaluation, project/location prioritization, implementation timetable(s), project packaging, and identification of potential investors/developers has led to - and is contained within - the attached draft document entitled "Downtown Master Development Strategies". Acceptance of this document is the goal behind the first agenda caption item.

Related Vision Item: Provide adequate amenities for all neighborhoods. Attract reinvestment. Develop strategic plan for recruitment. Examine liquidation of underutilized City properties. Financial Impact: The approved Phase I costs were for $68,000, plus

reimbursable expenses capped at $22,000. $66,000 of the $68,000 has been paid out, while $7200 of the $22,000 in reimbursable expenses has been paid out.

Attachments: Letter of Intent dated December 18, 2012 City Council minute record from December 18, 2012 City Council minute record from May 21, 2013 Draft of "Downtown Master Development Strategies"

document Presentation: AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services

Catalyst Urban Development, LLC I 25 Highland Park Village, Suite 100-280 I Dallas, Texas 75205 Tel 214-796-6063 I www.catalysturban.com

D E V E L O P M E N T C A T A L Y S T

December 2, 2012 Revised December 18, 2012 AJ Fawver, AICP Planning Manager City of San Angelo 52 W. College Avenue San Angelo, Texas 76903 Re: Downtown Redevelopment – Letter of Intent Dear Ms. Fawver: Catalyst Urban Development is ready to assist the City of San Angelo in its efforts to induce coordinated redevelopment in its Downtown. Based on our response to the Downtown Development Commission’s (DDC) Request for Proposals, we have prepared the following Letter of Intent (LOI) outlining the steps we believe are necessary to arrive at such projects. We look forward to discussing this LOI at the December 18th joint work session with the City Council and DDC. SCOPE OF SERVICES Phase 1: Implementation Action Plan Task 1.1: Investment/Horizontal Land Analysis Catalyst will undertake an analysis of the downtown zone to determine opportunity sites for new development. Based on Tom Green County Appraisal District data, this will include the analysis of current assessed values, vacant land, public lands, areas of declining tax base, etc. This analysis will take the form of GIS mapping to determine specific land/block/parcel groupings showing redevelopment promise. These findings will be further refined through our on-site review and determinations. Task 1.2: Market-Based Programming Catalyst will prepare an opportunities study that identifies market trends in demographics, demand, land use, capital market preferences, funding sources and uses, and practical implementation concerns. This analysis will generate a specific redevelopment program concept for a range of specific project types. It is assumed that such efforts will be done in coordination with key stakeholders in one public meeting. Task 1.3: Policy Context The Catalyst Team will consolidate the recommendations from the City’s current downtown plan (as part of its comprehensive plan update), current TIF and other incentive program potential, existing downtown zoning and development restrictions, and other policy goals gleaned from discussion with City Staff and stakeholders in prior meeting. This context will be compared to the results of Tasks 1.1 and 1.2 to begin to refine down to a specific target project list based on desired land use and location. Task 1.4: Ownership Evaluation Catalyst will meet with specific property owners for land/block/parcel groupings identified in the previous tasks to determine their goals, pricing, etc for use in the project prioritization process below. It is anticipated these meetings will occur during a one day worksession, in separate individual meetings. Task 1.5: Project and Location Prioritization Catalyst will identify the results of all tasks prepared to date to build a prioritized project list for discussion with the City. Prioritization is often associated with a project’s probability of implementation, its ability to

City of San Angelo December 2, 2012

Catalyst Urban Development, LLC I 25 Highland Park Village, Suite 100-280 I Dallas, Texas 75205

Tel 214-796-6063 I www.catalysturban.com

generate critical mass, strength of its location, and its ability to entice the market. Catalyst will present its analysis of all identified project sites to the City. This purpose will be to prioritize the projects and identify an initial phasing. Task 1.6: Implementation Timetable Catalyst will create an implementation timetable to advance the prioritized projects. Timetables will include short-term (i.e. 12 months), mid-term (2-4 years) and long-term (5-10 years) efforts. Task 1.7: Project Packaging Based on the results of the refined programming and prioritization, Catalyst will assemble supporting market data, project programming, physical planning, artist rendering, pricing, financial analysis, identified sources and uses of funds, incentive programs and related public/private partnership structures (if needed), and other information for 3 prioritized projects. This information will be assembled in project packages for use in marketing discussion in phase two upon City approval to do so. Task 1.8: Identify Potential Project Investors and Developers Catalyst will identify potential investment and developer prospects. In addition, and depending on the projects identified, Catalyst, NE Development and Construction, and related entities will analyze these projects as a potential vertical developer/investor itself; but this process does not guarantee Catalyst will commit to executing such a development. Task 1.9: City Approval Catalyst will present the full results of all phase one tasks to the City for review and final approval to advance to phase two. Phase 2: Horizontal Development Positioning Catalyst will not proceed into this phase without prior approval from City. Task 2.1: Developer/Investor Discussions Once the results of the phase one tasks are approved by the City, Catalyst will reach out to the developer/investor prospects identified in phase one to attempt to secure their interest. This process will also determine the Catalyst team member’s desire to move forward as vertical developers. Task 2.2: Horizontal Funding Strategy Depending on the requirements of the prioritized projects, Catalyst will help identify and position available special finance tools to gain property control and fund horizontal improvements as appropriate. Task 2.3: Zoning Consistent with prioritized projects, Catalyst will work with the City and property owners in a coordinated effort to seek necessary zoning for these projects. Task 2.4: Property Assembly Should the City be required to acquire certain properties or facilitate acquisition by third-parties, Catalyst will coordinate this process. Task 2.5: Market Outreach Based on the City’s approval gained in phase 1 and the completion of the work items listed above, Catalyst will coordinate the market roll-out for these projects.




Task 2.6: Marketing Team To facilitate this outreach, Catalyst will coordinate and help the City select a brokerage firm that will to prepare marketing and public relations strategy for these projects. It is anticipated this team would include both national/regional and local entities (JLL, CBRE, Grubb & Ellis, Dierchske & Dierschke, Scott Allison Realtors, etc). Phase 3: Vertical Development Positioning Catalyst will not proceed into this phase without prior approval from City. Once the Implementation Action Plan is approved by the City and the work associated with Phase 2 is completed or well underway, the Catalyst team will undertake the following work efforts for specific projects that a third-party developer or the Catalyst team desires to vertically execute. Should our team become the developer/investor, the City may utilize a non-interested party to undertake some of the work defined below.

• Financial Analysis -- Catalyst will prepare a refined financial analysis based on further developer input for City’s more detailed understanding. This analysis will be performed with emphasis on any economic gap requiring a public/private partnership.

• Public/Private Partnership -- As third party developers/investors become interested, and if such

(initial) focus projects require public/private partnerships to properly implement, Catalyst will work with the city attorney in its drafting of public/private partnership agreements.

• Pricing of Public Improvements -- Catalyst would work with civil engineer and landscape

architects on the conceptual design of necessary public improvements associated with each focus project that has gained market interest (if such improvements are the responsibility of the City in the public/private partnership proposed), and would work with site contractors to obtain related pricing to help define or verify the pricing proposed by each third-party developer/investor.

• Bond Strategy -- Should the sale of bonds be necessary to implement the identified projects,

Catalyst will assist the City in its definition of the improvements/projects associated with such a sale. Catalyst will work with the City’s attorney and bond sales agent in its formal processing of such efforts.

• Development Agreements -- If identified third-party developer/investor is interested in moving

forward, Catalyst will assist the City in its negotiation/finalization of related development agreements. Catalyst will work with the City’s attorney in all related drafting of such agreements.

Phase 4: Construction Management / Project Oversight Catalyst will not proceed into this phase without prior approval from City. Once vertical development project(s) are approved by the City, Catalyst will undertake actions aimed at helping guide the implementation of horizontal improvements (public improvements, master infrastructure, etc) necessary to the vertical development(s) as defined by the Public Private Partnership. This will include such efforts as the following:

• Master Infrastructure Design -- Catalyst would facilitate the engagement of civil engineers and landscape architects necessary to design and engineer construction drawings for the necessary master infrastructural improvements (public and/or private) associated with specific advancing developments.




• Refined Pricing Analysis – Based on this design process, Catalyst would refine the preliminary

pricing of such improvements (as performed in Phase 1), based on detailed construction drawings.

• Bidding and Contract Negotiation – Catalyst would coordinate the bidding of the master horizontal improvements and assist the City in its evaluation, selection, and contract negotiation of a contractor to complete the public improvements.

• Public Approvals and Permitting – Catalyst would coordinate the public approvals and permitting

of the public improvements.

• Utility Provider Negotiation and Contracts – Catalyst would coordinate and negotiate utility provider improvements and agreements.

• Construction Management – Catalyst would assist the city in the oversight of the construction

contract with the general contractor for the master infrastructure, reporting such progress to the City as it progresses.

Compensation Catalyst proposes to execute the work outlined in this letter of intent through the specific compensation format as outlined below. This compensation is exclusive to Catalyst; fees for outside groups and services (additional planners, attorneys, designers, reproduction houses, travel, etc) would be reimbursable expenses as approved separately by the City if deemed necessary. • Phase One – Catalyst proposes to complete this work for a lump sum amount of $68,000, excluding

reimbursable expenses. We estimate there may be an additional $12,000 to $22,000 for outside groups as approved by the City to include attorneys, civil engineers, etc. Whether these are necessary will be determined in the initial tasks.

• Phase Two -- Upon approval from City of San Angelo, Catalyst will progress into the second phase.

To complete these tasks, Catalyst would receive $10,000 per month until project-related development agreement(s) are executed. It is anticipated that this will occur with a 6 month time period. If the City chooses to acquire property, Catalyst would be entitled a fee of 3% the purchase price as City’s consultant.

• Phase Three -- Should the Catalyst team desire to become a developer/investor, fees for Phase Three

efforts would be part of a negotiated public/private partnership or development agreement. If Catalyst engages on City’s behalf with a third-party developer/investor to further induce implementation through the tasks identified in phase three, Catalyst would provide a fee proposal for such work at the time such work and developer/investor is further defined.

• Phase Four Fee -- Should the Catalyst team desire to become a developer/investor, fees for Phase Four

efforts would be part of a negotiated public/private partnership or development agreement. If Catalyst engages on City’s behalf with a third-party developer/investor, or simply on the City’s behalf for a non-project-related public improvement, Catalyst would be entitled to a fee of 1.5% the total value of improvements for the work outlined in Task 4 for which Catalyst would provide oversight. This amount would be part of the overall improvement budget and would be paid in equal monthly installments during the life of the construction period for said improvements.




• Other On-Going Tasks -- While the work described in this letter should constitute the primary work effort necessary to gain the market awareness necessary to urge implementation, there may be other tasks that arise out of this process that are not included here. Compensation for such tasks will be analyzed on a case-by-case basis for the City’s approval.

Contracts If the concepts and compensation outlined in this Letter of Intent are deemed acceptable and ready to be placed within a more detailed master development services contract, please acknowledge such acceptance by executing this Letter of Intent below. Such execution does not commit the City of San Angelo to enter such a relationship; it simply acknowledges the concepts, scope and compensation presented. If acceptable, the City and Catalyst would work to place these terms in a detailed master development services contract outlining the related detailed business terms acceptable to both parties. Catalyst is excited to offer this Letter of Intent to the City of San Angelo as we believe these efforts will assist the City move closer to the realization of its redevelopment goals for Downtown. As such, we look forward to your response. Sincerely, CATALYST URBAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC

Paris M. Rutherford IV Principal Cc: Rhys Heinsch -- Catalyst

Downtown Master DevelopMent strategies

san angelo, texas

City of San angelo, texaS - San angelo Downtown Development CommiSSion - CatalySt Urban Development

MASTER DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES

i

table of ContentsExecutive Summary

Summary of Economic Drivers Energy Sector Goodfellow Airforce Base Angelo State University

Trade Area Analysis Introductions to Trade Area Analysis Population Statistics Household Statistics Employment and Projections Employers

Land Use Programming OfficeAnalysis Restaurant Analysis Housing Analysis Programming Summary

Physical and Policy Analysis Physical Area Opportunities Analysis Downtown Infrastructure Ownership Type Analysis Land Assembly Analysis Assessed Value Analysis Tax Generation Analysis Local Regulations Ease of Development Subdistrict Identities Historic Sites Impacting Features Opportunity Sites Existing Policy Comprehensive Plan Update

Redevelopment Program Downtown Redevelopment InvestmentConcept1:RestaurantInfill RestaurantInfillZoneParcels InvestmentConcept2:WorkplaceInfill WorplaceInfillConcept-- Shannon Medical Center District InvestmentConcept3:ResidentialInfill ResidentialInfillZone-- Concho Riverfront Economic Development Tools

Conclusions

Sources

• City of San Angelo• Downtown Commission• San Angelo Chamber of Commerce• San Angelo Comprehensive Plan• American Community Survey• Census Bureau• EASI• ESRI Basemaps• ESRI Business Analyst• Texas Workforce Commission• Texas Railroad Commission• Texas Tech University Systems• Angelo State Centennial Study• Goodfellow Airforce Base• Google Earth• www.theclineshale.com• www.investmentu.com• Catalyst Urban Development

1

2345

6789

1415

1617182122

232425262728293031323334353637

383942434647

5152

57

58

ii

aCknowleDgeMentsSan Angelo City Council

Dwain Morrison - MayorRodney Fleming - District 1

Marty Self - District 2Johnny Silvas - District 3

Don Verderman - District 4H.R. Winkie Wardlaw - District 5

Charlotte Farmer - District 6

San Angelo Downtown Development Commission

Jim CummingsLisa Eady

Tim EdwardsJohn Fuentes

Sharon Rainey AlexanderGary Cox

Jim Raymond

San Angelo City Staff

Daniel Valenzuela - City ManagerMichael Dane - Assistant City Manager / CFO

Rick Weise - Assistant City ManagerBecky Dunn - Executive Office Coordinator

A.J. Fawver - Interim Director of Development ServicesJeff Hintz - Interim Senior Planner

Kevin Boyd - PlannerRoxanne Johnston - PlannerMike Smith - GIS Manager

Aaron Abilez - Senior GIS AnalystMorgan Kuhn - GIS Analyst

Daniela Curl - GIS Technician

Catalyst Urban Development - Project Manager

1map SoUrCeS: eSri, City of San angelo, CatalySt

Summary Notes:

• Primary Economic Drivers: Good-fellow Air Force Base, Angelo State University, and the energy industry.

• Downtown trade area includes the full city limits of San Angelo.

• Primary demand potential has been measured to include:

-600+ResidentialUnits -6NewRestaurants -220,000+sfofOfficeSpace

exeCutive suMMaryDemand Potential

The primary economic drivers effecting investment in the San Angelo marketplace include regional activities in the energy sector, growth and employment in the insti-tutional sector that includes Angelo State University and area health care providers, and Goodfellow Air Force Base. These economic anchors allow San Angelo to have a more stable economy than West Texas communities that are primarily dependent on energy sector employment, and providespecificopportunitiesthatcanbeappliedtonewinvestment in San Angelo’s downtown. When measuring the economic growth anticipated for the defined tradearea over the next ten years, and incorporating the unique out-of-marketpotentialprovidedbySanAngelo’sprimaryeconomic drivers, land use demand has been calculated for the downtown study area that includes demand for over 600 multifamily units across multiple residential densities, 6newrestaurants,andover220,000sfofnewofficespaceinvarioustenantconfigurations.

Introduction

Through its Downtown Development Commission, the City of San Angelo is pursuing efforts to identify new in-vestment opportunities within its Downtown core. To as-sist this effort, Catalyst Urban Development was engaged bytheCitytoidentifyspecificmasterdevelopmentstrate-gies and new investment project opportunities within the Downtown study area.This area is generally defined byHighway 67 to the north, the Concho River to the west, Washington Drive to the south, the Arts and Historic Dis-trict to the southeast, and Main Street to the east.

Market Development and Programming Analysis

The base demographics that effect investment in the downtownrealestatetradeareaandrelatedmarket-basedland use programming opportunities have been collected forpresentationinthisreport.Thetradeareadefinedforthese measurements includes the entire city limits of San Angelo and other immediate areas. These demo-graphics were measured through the study of available data sources including the US Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS), Texas Department of Labor and Statistics, Texas Railroad Commission, Concho Valley Appraisal District, EASI, ESRI, and the City of San Angelo.

Real estate programming potential was mea-sured by converting industry standard forecast-ed growth analysis for the targeted trade area to the range of real estate investment categories includingoffice,retail,restaurant,andhousing.

suMMary of eConoMiC Drivers

Downtown san angelo

2

San Angelo

3map & text SoUrCeS: texaS workforCe CommiSSion, eSri, City of San angelo, UtSa, CatalySt,

www.theClineShale.Com, www.inveStmentU.Com

energy seCtorPermitting associated with oil production in the Eagle Ford shale formation have increased from .61 permits / day to over 8.48 permits / day since 2009. Similarly, permits as-sociated with the Cline shale have risen from .62 permits per / day to 5.48 permits / day over the same period. This expansion in permitting indicates a measurable increase in employment

Like SanAngelo, the City ofVictoria benefits from itsproximity to the shale formation and has experienced an employment growth rate of 2.18% for the previous three years.

For the purposes of determining employment potential and accounting for the volatility inherent in the energy sec-tor, the projects for San Angelo include a 50% reduction to Victoria’s 2.18% employment growth rate.

Energy Sector Potential

With the discovery and current exploration of the poten-tial associated with regional shale formations, it appears San Angelo is well positioned for stable growth over the next development cycle. While little information currently exists on the employment prospects associated with shale formations in the area, industry experts have indicated that theCline,Spraberry,andWolfberryshalefieldsmayhold20 to 30 billion barrels of recordable oil. This potential production is comparable to the Eagle Ford shale in south-ern Texas and we have therefore used it as a comparable to analyze such employment potential.

Comparable Shale Field Analysis

Eagle Ford shale formation has generated expanded oil and gas production in the last few years that has greatly enhanced local economies and employment. In 2012 alone, these activities generated roughly $1 billion in revenue to local munici-pal governments and $1.2 billion to the State of Texas. The Eagle Ford Shale formation is estimated to contain 10 billion barrels of re-coverableoil,inadditiontosignificantnaturalgas deposits. This is less than half of the esti-mated oil and gas deposits in the Cline shale.

Cline Shale Potential

With oil prices being over $100/barrel, the economics to extract oil from the Cline shaleareprofitableaccordingtoenergysec-tor sources. This is anticipated to spark em-ployment growth proportionally consistent with that associated with the Eagle Ford for-mation.

Summary of Potential:

• EagleFordShalefieldstudiedascomparable economic driver.

• Clineshalefieldestimatedtodriveeconomic development through-out the 10 year programming period.

• This analysis indicates the poten-tial for over 5,000 jobs during the next 10 years.

4


• Ninethousandstudentstrainedevery year.

• At any given point over 5,000 mili-tary personnel, 800 civil service personnel, and 12,000 family mem-bers are stationed at the base.

• 5,165 employees currently work at the base.

• 3,307 on campus dormitory beds.

• 241 total dwelling units -25SingleFamilyHomes -96DuplexHomes -120Four-plexHomes

• Anannualoff-campusestimateof3,000 to 7,000 units.

• Goodfellow Air Force Base has an annual impact on 17,000 to 26,000 people in the community.

The Army’s 344th Military Intelligence Battalion is head-quartered at the base, and along with the rest of the base, hasasignificanthousingimpactonthecommunity.

There are 3,307 on base dormitory beds, and 241 dwell-ingunits(singlefamilyhomes,duplexhomes,andfour-plexhomes) on campus.

The base estimates an impact of 3,000 to 7,000 off campus units.Thetop-tierofthisdemandcanbeshiftedtoprop-erly positioned residential demand downtown

Background

Goodfellow Air Force Base, a joint service base, in San An-gelo is a major training facility for the United States Air Force. Over 9,000 students are trained in all services at the facility per year, and at any given time the base has over 5,000 military, 800 civil service, and 12,000 family mem-bers at the base. The Air Force Base, according to the San Angelo Chamber of Commerce, currently employs 5,165 employees, and has an annual impact on the city between 17,000 to 26,000 people annually.

gooDfellow air forCe base

SoUrCeS: gooDfellow air forCe baSe home page, google earth, CatalySt

5

SoUrCeS: leaDing the way 2020: texaS teCh UniverSity SyStem StrategiC prioritieS anD goalS,

aSU Centennial maSter plan


• Angelo State University has an economic development impact of $223 million for Tom Green County.

• Reports indicate the University will increase it’s enrollment from 6,888 students to 8,500 to 10,000 students.

• This increase in students creates a demand for 960 to 1,854 off campus beds, or 306 to 590 new 2, 3, and 4 bedroom units.

• The increased enrollment will cre-ate between 806 to 1,556 new jobs for the area.

• An enrollment increase to 10,000 students will have an additional economic development impact on Tom Green County of $169 million.

growth over the last nine years.The ratio of university related jobs per additional student is approximately 2:1. Therefore, 1,556 new jobs will be add-ed if student enrollment increases to 10,000; and 806 new jobs if enrollment increases to 8,500.

As shown in the table below, depending on the projections used, there will be demand for 960 to 1,854 beds. Two recent and popular student housing developments, “The Grove” and “Angelo Place” have 2, 3, and 4 bedroom units, and an average of 3.14 beds per unit indicates an additional need for 360 to 590 total units by 2020.

Background

Angelo State University, a part of the Texas Tech University System, has an estimated economic development impact of $223 million for Tom Green County. The Angelo State UniversityCentennial2020planspecifiesTexasTechUni-versity, and Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB), and the Texas Tech Report, projections. Each indicates strong enrollment increases for the university by 2020. The THECB reports have enrollment set to in-crease to 8,500, and the Texas Tech Report has a target of 10,000 enrolled students. This is with the backdrop of 1.2%

angelo state university

Student Housing Needs

Current Student body (2012) 6,888 studentsFreshman 34 %Sophmores 20 %Juniors 16 %Seniors 22 %Graduates 8 %

Texas Tech Universities Report 2020 Projections 10,000 studentsTHECB 2020 Projections 8,500 students

Angelo State University On-Campus Housing GoalsFreshman 70 %Sophmores 70 %Juniors 7 %Seniors / Graduates 5 %

ASU / TTU THECBProjected Growth (students) 3,112 1,612

Freshman 1,058 548 Sophmores 622 322 Juniors 498 258 Seniors 685 355 Graduates 249 129

Off-Campus Student Apartment Needs (students)Freshman 317 164 Sophmores 187 97 Juniors 463 240 Seniors / Graduates 887 459

Total Off-Campus Needs by 2020 (beds) 1,854 960 Total Units (3.14 beds/unit) 590 306

traDe area analysis

Downtown san angelo

6

Single Family

Duplex-Quadplex

(2-4)

Garden Apts (5-19)

Structured (20+) Other

Millenials0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

15 to 34 35 to 64 65 and Up

Population Percentage Householder Percentage

7SoUrCeS: eSri, City of San angelo, ,CatalySt

introDuCtion to traDe area

within the West Texas community, a broader trade area designation is appropriate. As such, the city limits of San Angelo have been designated as the trade area boundary for all land uses except restaurants, which have been given atradeareaboundarydefinedbya15-minutedrivetimefor larger market catchment.

Trade Area

Traditionally, land use programming is calculated through the measurement of demographics within a 10-minutedrive time of a particular site area. As Downtown San An-gelo, and the City of San Angelo itself is a regional center

8

Population Groups Total PercentageUnder 15 18,255 19.8%15 to 34 30,452 33.0%35 to 64 30,988 33.6%65 and Up 12,639 13.7%All Groups 92,334 100.0%

Householders Total Percentage15 to 34 9,480 26.9%35 to 64 17,327 49.1%65 and Up 8,482 24.0%All Householders 35,289 100.0%

Thisreflectstheeconomicdrivers inthearea,specifical-ly the education system and Angelo State University. The population is generally young, with Baby Boomers and the Silent Generation only making up 10.6% and 13.7% of the population.

As a percentage of households, the Millennial generation is under represented, while Generation X, the Baby Boom-ers, and the Silent Generation make up the majority of householders.

SoUrCeS: 2011 aCS 5 yr eStimate, CatalySt

Summary Notes:

• 92,334 total population in San Angelo.

• 51.3% female; 48.7% male.

• Generation breakdowns Millennial-33.0%

GenerationX-23.0% BabyBoomers-10.6% Silent Generation 13.7%

• As a percentage of householders, the Millennial generation is under represented.

population statistiCs

American Community Survey 5 year estimates (2007-2011), measured the population of San Angelo as 92,334. 51.3% of the population is female, and 48.7% is male.

Breaking down the population groups into generation groups, the largest population group is the Millennial gen-eration at 33.0%, followed by Generation X at 23.0%.

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

15 to 34 35 to 64 65 and Up

Population Percentage Householder Percentage

Population Totals Male 44,960 48.7% Female 47,374 51.3%Total population 92,334

Under 5 years 6,769 7.3% 5 to 9 years 6,315 6.8% 10 to 14 years 5,171 5.6% 15 to 19 years 7,959 8.6% 20 to 24 years 9,494 10.3% 25 to 34 years 12,999 14.1% 35 to 44 years 9,811 10.6% 45 to 54 years 11,394 12.3% 55 to 59 years 5,301 5.7% 60 to 64 years 4,482 4.9% 65 to 74 years 6,348 6.9% 75 to 84 years 4,732 5.1% 85 years and over 1,559 1.7%Total population 92,334

Generation Population PercentageMillennials 30,452 33.0%Gen X 21,205 23.0%Baby Boomers 9,783 10.6%Silent Generation 12,639 13.7%

9

Summary Notes:

• 39,458 total household units.

• 10.6% vacancy across all house-hold types.

• Approximate 75% of the house-hold market is single family house-holds.

• 36.6% of the housing market is renter occupied.

• Nearly100%ofmultifamilyunitsare renter occupied.

• The majority of single family households are owner occupied.


HouseHolDs statistiCs anD units per struCture

American Community Survey 5 year estimates (2007-2011), measured 39,458 total households. 4,169, or 10.6% of these households are vacant, therefore 35,289 are oc-cupied households.

Single family households make up nearly 75% of that total household market, with nearly 30,000 units. Townhomes are the second highest housing type with less than 10% of the total volume of single family households.

Total Occupied Vacant Vacancy %Owner

OccupiedRenter

OccupiedRenter

Occupied %Single Family 29,528 27,097 2,431 8.2% 21,569 5,528 20.4%Duplex-Quadplex (2-4) 1,151 930 221 19.2% 65 865 93.0%Townhomes (5-9) 2,591 2,322 269 10.4% 15 2,307 99.4%Low Density MF (10-19) 2,037 1,631 406 19.9% 73 1,558 95.5%Medium Density MF (20-49) 870 701 169 19.4% 11 690 98.4%High Density MF (50+) 2,029 1,635 394 19.4% 57 1,578 96.5%Other 1,252 973 279 22.3% 577 396 40.7%All Units 39,458 35,289 4,169 10.6% 22,367 12,922 36.6%

2011 City of San Angelo Housing (Units / Structure)

Single Family

Duplex-Quadplex (2-4)

Townhomes (5-9)

Low Density MF (10-19)

Medium Density MF (20-

49)

High Density MF (50+)

Other

Vacancy percentages are close to 20% for the multifamily units, and less than 10% for the single family residences.

Renters occupy 36.6% of the housing market, approaching 100% renter occupancy rates in the higher density prod-ucts. The majority of owner occupied households are in the single family market.

10SoUrCeS: 2011 aCS 5 yr eStimate, CatalySt

Summary Notes:

• The Millennial Generation are the least likely to stay in Single Family Housing.

• The Millennial Generation is more likely to stay in Garden Apart-ments (24.1%) than any other Generation.

• The Millennial Generation is also likely to reside in Structured Apartments (9.5%).

• Generation X and the Baby Boomer Generation will prefer to stay in Garden Apartments than Structured Apartments.

• The Silent and Greatest Gen-eration are more likely to stay in Structured Housing (nursing homes and independent living) than Garden Apartments.

HouseHolD statistiCs anD unit sizing

Owner Occupied

Renter Occupied Total

Percent of Total

15 to 34 3,073 6,407 9,480 26.9%Single Family 2,976 2,669 5,645 59.5%Duplex-Quadplex (2-4) - 404 404 4.3%Garden Apts (5-19) - 2,289 2,289 24.1%Structured (20+) - 898 898 9.5%Other 97 147 244 2.6%

35 to 64 12,449 4,878 17,327 49.1%Single Family 12,096 2,379 14,475 83.5%Duplex-Quadplex (2-4) 30 391 421 2.4%Garden Apts (5-19) 23 1,406 1,429 8.2%Structured (20+) - 453 453 2.6%Other 300 249 549 3.2%

65 and Up 6,845 1,637 8,482 24.0%Single Family 6,497 480 6,977 82.3%Duplex-Quadplex (2-4) 35 70 105 1.2%Garden Apts (5-19) 65 170 235 2.8%Structured (20+) 68 917 985 11.6%Other 180 - 180 2.1%

Single Family

Duplex-Quadplex

(2-4)

Garden Apts (5-19)


Millennials

Single Family

Duplex-Quadplex

(2-4)

Garden Apts (5-19)

Structured (20+)

Other

Gen X + Baby Boomers

Single Family

Duplex-Quadplex

(2-4)

Garden Apts (5-19)


Silent / Greatest Gen.

The accompanying table breaks down ACS Survey infor-mation intohouseholdsbynumberofunitswithspecificage ranges shown. Our analysis of this information has uncoveredanopportunitytobetterappealtoonespecificdemographic population; the Millennials.

When compared to older population groups, the Millen-nials (definedasapersonranging inage from15 to34)are marked by their propensity to live in more urban en-vironments with access to a range of activities and social endeavors. This population group has sparked the urban redevelopment in the core of cities such as Austin, Dallas, and Houston. Unlike their older peers, they are generally not as satisfied living in single use apartment communi-ties such as the majority of multifamily housing stock in SanAngeloortheoldersingle-familyhomespresentintheneighborhoods surrounding ASU. Their presence in these buildings is likely to identify a lack of housing options in the San Angelo marketplace and can be leveraged for new growth in Downtown that is more suited to the Millennial generation’swell-documenteddesires.

11

Built 2000 or Later

Built 1980 to 1999

Built 1960 to 1979

Built 1940 to 1959

Built 1939 or Earlier

All Generations

The majority of housing in the San Angelo marketplace was built before 1980, with the largest percentage of units havingbeenbuiltbetween1960and1979.ThisidentifiesSan Angelo’s housing stock to be generally quite old when compared to other Texas communities and underscores the need for new investment due to a lack of product op-tions and amenities. Given San Angelo’s highest population percentage are those below the age of 35, the City’s aver-age age is comparatively young and the potential mismatch between these age ranges housing needs and desires with the conditions of the existing housing stock is an issue that will need to be addressed over time to allow the City to remain competitive.


HouseHolD statistiCs anD Housing age

Built 2000 or Later

Built 1980 to 1999

Built 1960 to 1979

Built 1940 to 1959


Millennials

Built 2000 or Later

Built 1980 to 1999

Built 1960 to 1979

Built 1940 to 1959



Built 2000 or Later

Built 1980 to 1999

Built 1960 to 1979

Built 1940 to 1959



Summary Notes:

• The majority of households were built before 1980, with the largest percentage built between 1960 and 1979.

• The Millennial Generation lives in newer product at a greater rate than the other generations. 43.7% of the households they live in were built after 1980.

• Generation X, Baby Boomers, the Silent Generation, and the Great-est Generation, are fairly evenly distributed by the housing catego-ries.

Owner Occupied


Percent of Total

15 to 34 3,073 6,407 9,480 26.9%Built 2000 or Later 457 597 1,054 11.1%Built 1980 to 1999 646 2,442 3,088 32.6%Built 1960 to 1979 899 2,150 3,049 32.2%Built 1940 to 1959 886 917 1,803 19.0%Built 1939 or Earlier 185 301 486 5.1%

35 to 64 12,449 4,878 17,327 49.1%Built 2000 or Later 1,128 365 1,493 8.6%Built 1980 to 1999 2,923 1,378 4,301 24.8%Built 1960 to 1979 3,517 1,832 5,349 30.9%Built 1940 to 1959 3,577 952 4,529 26.1%Built 1939 or Earlier 1,304 351 1,655 9.6%

65 and Up 6,845 1,637 8,482 24.0%Built 2000 or Later 536 83 619 7.3%Built 1980 to 1999 1,645 564 2,209 26.0%Built 1960 to 1979 2,354 734 3,088 36.4%Built 1940 to 1959 1,674 145 1,819 21.4%Built 1939 or Earlier 636 111 747 8.8%

12SoUrCeS: 2011 aCS 5 yr eStimate, CatalySt

HouseHolD statistiCs - lengtH of resiDenCe

Owner Occupied


Percent of Total

15 to 34 3,073 6,407 9,480 26.9%Moved 2005 or Later 2,166 5,848 8,014 84.5%Moved 2000 to 2004 734 344 1,078 11.4%Moved 1990 to 1999 117 196 313 3.3%Moved 1980 to 1989 19 19 38 0.4%Moved 1979 or Earlier 37 - 37 0.4%

35 to 64 12,449 4,878 17,327 49.1%Moved 2005 or Later 3,478 3,753 7,231 41.7%Moved 2000 to 2004 2,517 593 3,110 17.9%Moved 1990 to 1999 3,737 390 4,127 23.8%Moved 1980 to 1989 1,654 95 1,749 10.1%Moved 1979 or Earlier 1,063 47 1,110 6.4%

65 and Up 6,845 1,637 8,482 24.0%Moved 2005 or Later 935 784 1,719 20.3%Moved 2000 to 2004 934 510 1,444 17.0%Moved 1990 to 1999 1,529 196 1,725 20.3%Moved 1980 to 1989 906 91 997 11.8%Moved 1979 or Earlier 2,541 56 2,597 30.6%

Moved 2005 or

Later

Moved 2000 to

2004

Moved 1990 to

1999

Moved 1980 to

1989

Moved 1979 or Earlier

Millennials

Moved 2005 or

Later

Moved 2000 to

2004

Moved 1990 to

1999

Moved 1980 to

1989



Moved 2005 or

Later

Moved 2000 to

2004

Moved 1990 to

1999

Moved 1980 to

1989



Moved 2005 or

LaterMoved 2000 to

2004

Moved 1990 to

1999

Moved 1980 to

1989


All Generations

Summary Notes:

• Nearly50%ofallmove-inshaveoccurredsince2005.Thisreflectsa relatively high transient popula-tion. The percentages by popula-tion group follow.

• 84.5% of Millennials have moved into their households since 2005.

• 49.1% of Generation X and Baby Boomers have moved into their households since 2005.

• 37.3% of the Silent and Greatest Generation have moved into their households since 2000.

13

Household Incomes

Outside Target Area

Household Incomes Within

Target Area


HouseHolD statistiCs - Housing Density & inCoMe

Totals PercentagesTotal Household Units 39,458

Occupied Household Units 35,289 89.4%Vacant Units 4,169 10.6%

Owner Occupied HH Units 22,367 63.4%Renter Occupier HH Units 12,922 36.6%

Median Household Incomes Less than $10,000 2,549 7.2% $10,000 to $14,999 2,742 7.8% $15,000 to $19,999 2,665 7.6% $20,000 to $24,999 2,635 7.5% $25,000 to $29,999 2,369 6.7% $30,000 to $34,999 2,114 6.0% $35,000 to $39,999 2,203 6.2% $40,000 to $44,999 1,549 4.4% $45,000 to $49,999 1,626 4.6% $50,000 to $59,999 2,866 8.1% $60,000 to $74,999 3,857 10.9% $75,000 to $99,999 3,631 10.3% $100,000 to $124,999 2,010 5.7% $125,000 to $149,999 1,055 3.0% $150,000 to $199,999 680 1.9% $200,000 or more 738 2.1%

Lower Density 41.3%

Medium Density 17.6%

High Density 41.1%

Multi Family Housing Occupied Vacant TotalVacancy

PercentagePercentage

of Total

Multi Family Lower Density 1,631 406 2,037 19.9% 41.3%Multi Family Medium Density 701 169 870 19.4% 17.6%Multi Family High Density 1,635 394 2,029 19.4% 41.1%Total 3,967 969 4,936 58.8% 100.0%

Summary Notes:

• Median Household incomes are used as a major determinate for new real estate product types.

• For new residential development, households with median income between $35,000 and $100,000 are often isolated to determine the market for upscale attached residential, as well as retail/res-taurant. 44.6% of the trade area households fall within this range.

• The majority of Multi Family density is in structures between 10-19units(LowDensityGar-denApartments),and50+(HighRise and High Density Structured Apartments).

• 20% of the Multi Family Market is considered Medium Density (20 to 49 units per structure).

14SoUrCeS: 2010 CenSUS, 2011 aCS 5 yr eStimate,

eaSi, City of San angelo ComprehenSive plan, CatalySt

Summary Notes:

• The American Community Survey 5 year estimate measures 46,392 jobs in San Angelo.

• 22,305, or 48.1%, are white collar orofficejobs.

• Baseline projections are based upon growth since 1990. 10 year growthfiguresare:

- 5,557 People -2,488Households

-2,828Jobs

• 2011 estimates indicate an in-crease of nearly 1,500 new jobs. More than half the projected baseline growth.

eMployMent anD projeCtions

Employment Categories Total Percentage Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining 1,017 2.2% Construction 2,677 5.8% Manufacturing 2,648 5.7% Wholesale trade 995 2.1% Retail trade 5,507 11.9% Transportation and warehousing, and utilities 995 2.1% Information 1,575 3.4% Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental and leasing 2,529 5.5% Professional, scientific, and management, and administrative and waste management services 3,570 7.7% Educational services, and health care and social assistance 11,529 24.9% Public administration 3,102 6.7% Arts, entertainment, and recreation, and accommodation and food services 4,259 9.2% Other services (except public administration) 2,392 5.2% Armed forces* 3,597 7.8%Total Work Force Employment: 46,392 100.0%

Office-Oriented Jobs 22,305 48.1%

The 2011 American Community Survey data shows that out of the 46,392 jobs in the City of San Angelo, 22,305 are considered “white collar”. This White Collar percent-age, a combination of Information, Finance and Insurance, processional, scientific andmanagement, educational andhealth care, and public administration, is a robust 48.1%.

Therefore according to baseline data, out of the 2,828 new jobs created within the next ten years, 48.1%, or 1,360 jobs willbeofficeoriented.Thesejobswillrequireofficespace.Any additional job growth will maintain the same percent-age, depending on the industry.

In the 2010 Census there were 39,548 household units within San Angelo. 2010 5yr ACS Estimate show 44,952 jobs, which means there are approximately 1.14 jobs per household, or 0.88 households created for every job. These trends however are a baseline from 1990, 2000, and 2010 census data and do not take into account any new economic activity driven by major employers in the area, including a potential oil boom.

The baseline 2020 projection suggests an increase of 2,828 jobs, however, between the years 2010 and 2011, Census Bureau data shows 1,390 jobs have already been added (2011ACSdatahasafigureof46,392jobs).

The latest Texas Workforce Development data for the San Angelo MSA show 47,500 in April, 2013. The San Angelo MSA covers the counties of Irion and Tom Green, but it is clear that recent numbers indicate that the baseline 2020 job projection of 47,780 will be surpassed.

Population HH Units Employment1990 Comp / EASI 84,474 34,891 n/a2000 Census 88,439 37,699 n/a2010 Census / ACS 93,200 39,548 44,952 2020 Projection 98,757 42,036 47,780

10 Year Growth 5,557 2,488 2,828

15SoUrCeS: San angelo Chamber of CommerCe, www.inveStmentU.Com, CatalySt

Summary Notes:

• Goodfellow Air Force Base is the largest employer with over 5,000 employees.

• Angelo State University has 1,680 employees.

• The other top employers in the area are tied to population and job growth. These include: 1) San Angelo ISD 2) City of San Angelo 3) Tom Green County 4) Medical Facilities

• A potential new driver of popula-tion and employment could be the oil and gas industry.

eMployersBlueCross BlueShield of Texas is tied to employment and jobs within the area, and as more jobs come, this organiza-tion will likely grow as well.

With the recent advances in the energy sector, it is antici-pated that related employers will rise in these rankings.

The City of San Angelo has a number of large employ-ers. The top employer is Goodfellow Air Force Base with 5,165 total employees. The Shannon Health System is sec-ond highest at 2,627 employees.

The next largest employers are part of the education system. San Angelo ISD and Shannon Health System are largely tied with the population of San Angelo. The former especially will grow as additional residents move into the city. Other organizations tied to the population of the city are the San Angelo Community Medical Center, City of San Angelo, and Tom Green County.

lanD use prograMMing

Downtown san angelo

16

$-$200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000

$1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 $1,600,000 $1,800,000 $2,000,000

Legend Restaurant Type

1 JoesBrewhouse&Winery PubFood&Pizza

2 The Office Bar Bar

3 Concho's Bar&Food

4 Re Rees Bar

5 Diegos Buritos Mexican Food

6 Mesquite Bean Breakfast Café and Coffee

7 Sealy Flats Seafood, Music, and Bar

8 Miss Hattie's Restaurant

9 Stangos Coffee Shop LunchandLateNightCafé

10 Grinners Bar

11 The Dead Horse Bar

12 Tejano Country Bar&Music

13 House of FiFi DuBois Bar&Music

14 Chadbourne Street Deli Sandwich / Subs

15 Fuente's Mexican Food

16 Fat Boss Pub Pub

17 Private Venue Private Venue

18 Black Swan Gallery Wine Bar

19 Blaine's Pub Bar&Music

20 37 Ice Cream

21 Julio'sBurritos Mexican Food

22 McDonalds Fast Food

23 Subway Sandwich / Subs

24 Grandy's Buffet

25 Quiznos Sandwich / Subs

26 Burger King Fast Food

27 TBD Under Construction

28 Schlotzky's Sandwich / Subs

29 ZeroOneAleHouse Bar&Pub

30 Sonic Fast Food

31 FL's Garden Private Venue

32 Los Panchitos Mexican

2011 Employment 46,392 jobs10 year baseline Growth 2,828 jobs

Additional Jobs in ten year periodASU Projected Growth 806 jobsOil and Gas Market 5,012 jobsTotal Additional Jobs 5,818 jobs

Total Jobs 8,646 jobs

Projected Office-Oriented Jobs (48.1%) 4,159 jobesPotential Building Area (using 250s sf/employee ratio) 1,039,697 sfAssumed Vacancy Fill Rate 15.0 %Downtown Capture Rate 25.0 %

Potential New Downtown Space (10 years+) 220,936 sf

Office Demand Calculations

17SoUrCeS: 2011 aCS 5 yr eStimate, City of San angelo, CatalySt

Summary Notes:

• 8,646 total new jobs in San Angelo.

• 4,159office-orientedjobs.

• 250 sf / employment ratio equates to 1,097,697 sf of potential build-ing area.

• 15%vacancyfillrate.

• 25% downtown capture rate.

• 220,936 sf of potential new downtown space.

offiCe analysis

2011 Employment 46,392 jobs10 year baseline Growth 2,828 jobs

Additional Jobs in ten year periodASU Projected Growth 806 jobsOil and Gas Market 5,012 jobsTotal Additional Jobs 5,818 jobs

Total Jobs 8,646 jobs

Projected Office-Oriented Jobs (48.1%) 4,159 jobsPotential Building Area (using 250s sf/employee ratio) 1,039,697 sfAssumed Vacancy Fill Rate 15.0 %Downtown Capture Rate 25.0 %

Potential New Downtown Space (10 years+) 220,936 sf

Office Demand Calculations

During the ten year period, an additional 8,648 jobs will be added, including the baseline growth, and additional jobs spurred on by the education and energy sectors.

Utilizingthecurrentoffice-orientedpercentageof48.1%,and applying it to the total number of new jobs, Catalyst projectsanadditional4,159officeorientedjobs.Thisac-counts for over 1 million sf.

Assuming15%ofthisgrowthwillfillcurrentvacancies,andapplying a conservative capture rate of 25%, San Angelo downtowncanexpectover200,000sfinnewofficespace.

American Community Survey estimates measure a total of 46,392 jobs for 2011. The ten year baseline growth based on census bureau statistics dating back to 1990, measure a 10 year baseline growth of 2,828 jobs.

The one year employment growth from 2010 to 2011 is 1,500 jobs, nearly half the baseline growth implying addi-tional jobs are being added due to recent investment in the energy industry.

Angelo State University is growing, and is projected to conservatively add another 806 jobs in the period.

18SoUrCeS: eSri bUSineSS analySt, CenSUS bUreaU, CatalySt

Summary Notes:

• Negativeretailgapduetoregionalnature of San Angelo.

• there are 13.33 restaurants per 10,000 people in San Angelo, right at the average of similar cities.

• Sales per restaurant in the down-town area is low.

• Opportunity for demand through unique dining experiences such as food trucks, or restaurant incuba-tor space.

• Additional growth brought in by Angelo State University and the oil and gas industry will create demand for additional full service restaurants.

restaurant analysisRetail Leakage by ESRI’s Business Analyst measures the dif-ference between demand for different retail services, and the supply within a trade area. The City of San Angelo has a negative restaurant gap; however, since San Angelo is a regional draw, the restaurant demand trade area goes out further than the current supply/demand trade boundary.

The table below indicates that on a restaurant per pop-ulation basis, San Angelo is right at the average of simi-lar sized cities. With regards to sales per restaurant the graphtoshowssignificantlylowerthanaverage(indicatedby dashed red line), implying there is opportunity for in-creased total restaurant sales, either by more choice, or improved experiences.

Cities PopulationTotal

RestaurantsTotal Food and Drink Supply

Total Food and Drink Supply / Rest

Restaurant / Population (10,000)

Total Restaurants

Total Food and Drink Supply

Total Food and Drink Supply / Rest

San Marcos 47,433 89 89,806,061$ 1,009,057$ 18.76 19 37,470,772$ 1,972,146$ Temple 69,307 90 98,262,074$ 1,091,801$ 12.99 7 4,219,473$ 602,782$ San Angelo 95,293 127 103,581,369$ 815,601$ 13.33 20 9,697,633$ 484,882$ College Station 97,074 112 124,768,024$ 1,114,000$ 11.54 23 29,820,580$ 1,296,547$ Tyler 98,715 144 133,254,061$ 925,375$ 14.59 8 5,656,169$ 707,021$ Odessa 102,361 152 140,325,819$ 923,196$ 14.85 14 8,093,042$ 578,074$ Midland 115,168 158 155,938,222$ 986,951$ 13.72 14 11,703,770$ 835,984$ Denton 118,240 135 118,284,441$ 876,181$ 11.42 14 2,943,096$ 210,221$ Abilene 118,365 142 160,079,930$ 1,127,323$ 12.00 6 7,844,041$ 1,307,340$ Waco 127,339 185 186,378,388$ 1,007,451$ 14.53 22 13,062,822$ 593,765$ Lubbock 234,999 313 283,604,470$ 906,085$ 13.32 13 4,657,184$ 358,245$ Totals 1,224,294 1,647 1,594,282,859$ 967,992$ 13.45 160 135,168,582$ 844,804$

*Downtown Area an approximate area designated through aerial analysis

City Totals (2012 ESRI) Downtown Area* (2012 ESRI)

NAICS Demand Supply Retail Gap Leakage/Surplus Number of

Industry Group (Retail Potential) (Retail Sales) Factor Businesses

FoodServices&DrinkingPlaces 722 $77,511,210 $103,581,369 -$26,070,159 -14.4 127

Full-ServiceRestaurants 7221 $30,396,531 $58,211,508 -$27,814,977 -31.4 50

Limited-ServiceEatingPlaces 7222 $39,800,255 $39,804,517 -$4,262 0.0 51

Special Food Services 7223 $2,141,674 $1,429,886 $711,788 19.9 6

DrinkingPlaces-AlcoholicBeverages 7224 $5,172,750 $4,135,458 $1,037,292 11.1 20

$-$200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000

$1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 $1,600,000 $1,800,000 $2,000,000

19map anD table SoUrCeS: eSri, City of San angelo, CatalySt

Summary Notes:

• 32 total restaurants in the area including:

- Pub Food -Bars

-MexicanFood

-Lunch

-MusicVenues

-PrivateVenues

-IceCream

-FastFood

-Buffets

-Deli/Sandwich

restaurant analysis existing faCilities

Legend Restaurant Type

1 JoesBrewhouse&Winery PubFood&Pizza

2 The Office Bar Bar

3 Concho's Bar&Food

4 Re Rees Bar

5 Diegos Buritos Mexican Food

6 Mesquite Bean Breakfast Café and Coffee

7 Sealy Flats Seafood, Music, and Bar

8 Miss Hattie's Restaurant

9 Stangos Coffee Shop LunchandLateNightCafé

10 Grinners Bar

11 The Dead Horse Bar

12 Tejano Country Bar&Music

13 House of FiFi DuBois Bar&Music

14 Chadbourne Street Deli Sandwich / Subs

15 Fuente's Mexican Food

16 Fat Boss Pub Pub

17 Private Venue Private Venue

18 Black Swan Gallery Wine Bar

19 Blaine's Pub Bar&Music

20 37 Ice Cream

21 Julio'sBurritos Mexican Food

22 McDonalds Fast Food

23 Subway Sandwich / Subs

24 Grandy's Buffet

25 Quiznos Sandwich / Subs

26 Burger King Fast Food

27 TBD Under Construction

28 Schlotzky's Sandwich / Subs

29 ZeroOneAleHouse Bar&Pub

30 Sonic Fast Food

31 FL's Garden Private Venue

32 Los Panchitos Mexican

ESRI 2012 Business Analyst measure 127 restaurants with-in San Angelo, and 20 restaurants in the downtown area.

OnthefieldstudiesbyCatalyst,asseeninthemapbelowcounted 32 downtown establishments (including night life, bars, and delis).

20CompoStie SoUrCe analySiS: CatalySt

Summary Notes:

• 16,990 additional population growth expected.

• Applying growth rate to number of restaurants creates potential demand for 23 new restaurants in San Angelo.

• A 25% capture rate indicates de-mand for 6 new Downtown San Angelo Restaurants.

restaurant analysis DeManD

Demand for restaurants will increase with population growth. In 2011, the population of San Angelo was 92,334, and baseline population growth is 5,557. This number will increase due to additional economic activity occurring due to the education and economic sectors.

Angelo State University is conservatively expected to add 806 jobs, and the oil and gas sector will add 5,012 jobs. To-tal additional jobs, including baseline projections is 16,990 people.

This population increase, including growth from economic sectors, is 18.4%, and applying that to the total number of restaurants results in demand for 23 new restaurants in San Angelo.

Utilizing a capture rate of 25% indicates demand for 6 additional restaurants in Downtown San Angelo. There is also opportunity for existing restaurants to reinvent them-selves to capture additional sales in line with downtowns of similar sized cities.

Restaurants in San Angelo 127 restaurantsRestaurants in Downtown San Angelo 32 restaurants

2011 San Angelo Population 92,334 people10 year baseline Growth 5,557 people

Additional Jobs in ten year periodASU Projected Growth 806 jobsOil and Gas Market 5,012 jobsTotal Additional Jobs 5,818 jobsAdditional Population created by jobs (1.96) 11,433 people

Total Population added in 10 year period 16,990 people

Population Increase as a percentage 18.4 %Total Additional Restaurants in San Angelo 23 restaurantsDowntown Capture Rate 25.0 %Total Additional Restaurants in downtown San Angelo 6 restaurants

Restaurant Demand Calculations

21CompoSite SoUrCe analySiS: CatalySt

Summary Notes:

• Baseline 10 year demand is 2,488 households.

• Additional jobs will add 5,180 households.

• Applying a rental occupied per-centage rate and a target house-hold income median rate equals demand for 1,034 units (including new supply coming online).

• There are 1,418 target renters living in multifamily product that is older than 30 years.

• The total target market for the City of San Angelo is 2,452 multi family units.

• Downtown San Angelo has de-mand for 613 multi family units (using a capture rate of 25%).

Housing analysis

Baseline 10 year Demand 2,488 households

Additional Jobs in ten year periodASU Projected Growth 806 jobsOil and Gas Market 5,012 jobsTotal Additional Jobs 5,818 jobsHouseholds created by Employees (0.88/job) 5,120 households

Total Households added in 10 year period 7,608 householdsRental Occupied Households (36.6%) 2,785 rental HHTarget HH Income (44.6%) 1,242 MF Units

Supply - San Angelo Place (Phase 2) 224 units

Multifamily Demand from Growth 1,034 units

Existing MF Supply Age (5+ units / structure)Within last 30 years 3,400 unitsVacancy Percentage 7.06 %Older than 30 years 3,319 unitsVacany Percentage 14.51 %

Target Current Renters 35K to 100K 4,578 householdersTarget Renters in Newer Product 3,160 householdersTarget Renters in Older Product 1,418 householders

Multifamily Demand from Growth 1,034 householdsTarget Renters in Older Product 1,418 householdsTotal Target Market 2,452 householdsCapture Rate 25 %Downtown MF Market 613 MF Units

Multi Family Demand Calculations

Baseline 10 year growth for households is measured at 2,488. Additional jobs in the ten year period, at a 0.88 hh created per job ratio, (San Angelo average), will create 5,120 new households. Applying a renter occupied percentage of 38.8%, and a target household income percentage of 46.6%, creates demand for 1,242 new multi family units. San An-gelo Phase 2 is expected to supply 224 additional units, providing demand for 1,034 new multifamily units.

The approximate median age for existing multi family units in San Angelo is 30 years. Vacancy for product built within the last 30 years is 7.04%, and vacant for product built more than 30 years ago, is 14.51%. This indicates that there are 1,418 target renters in older product, creating a to-tal pool of 2,452 multi family units. Applying a 25% cap-ture rate equates to demand for 613 multi family units in Downtown San Angelo

22CompoSite SoUrCe analySiS: CatalySt

Summary Notes:

• Potential new development:

- 613 MF Units

- 6 Restaurants

-220,936sfofOfficeSpace

prograMMing

suMMary

2011 Population 92,334 people2011 Household 39,458 households2011 Employment 46,392 jobs

Baseline Growth10 year population 5,557 people10 year household 2,488 households10 year employment 2,828 jobs

Additional Growth Expected from ASU & Energy SectorPopulation 11,381 peopleHousehold 5,818 householdsEmployment 5,792 jobs

Total Growth10 year population total 16,938 people10 year household total 8,306 households10 year employment total 8,620 jobs

New Development within Downtown San AngeloMultifamily Units 613 unitsRestaurants 6 restaurantsOffice Space 220,936 sf

Summary Sheet

The following table summarizes baseline growth for popu-lation, households, and employment, for the City of San Angelo, additional growth expected from Angelo State University and the Energy Sector, over a ten year period.

This total growth will lead to new development in the housing,restaurant,andofficesectorsofDowntownSanAngelo. There are redevelopment opportunities available duetoolderproductinthehousingandofficemarketandlimited variety in the food industry.

pHysiCal anD poliCy analysis

Downtown san angelo

23

24SoUrCeS: eSri, City of San angelo, CatalySt

Summary Notes:

• Existing factors include:

-Regionalcore

-Largeurbanfootprint

-Varieddensities

-Rangeofidentities

pHysiCal area

opportunities

25SoUrCeS: City of San angelo, CatalySt

Summary Notes:

• Map shows existing water and waste water utilities.

• Infrastructure is already in place.

• Infrsatructure will accommodate new redevelopment and reinvest-ment.

Downtown infrastruCture

Downtown Infrastructure

26SoUrCeS: eSri, City of San angelo, tom green appraiSal DiStriCt, CatalySt

Summary Notes:

• Map shows parcels highlighted by ownership, city, and other public or private entity.

• River corridor is controlled by City of San Angelo.

• Tom Green County controls other property with potential for new development.

• Majority of land is is privately owned and property assembly for new projects will likely require pri-vate sector involvement.

ownersHip type analysis


Summary Notes:

• Map differentiates blocks by the number of owners. Blocks with fewer owners will be easier to assemble.

• There are simpler land assembly opportunitiestotheNorth.

• There are simpler land assembly opportunities near Fort Concho, the Art District, and the river cor-ridor.

• Difficultlandassembliesinthehistoric downtown core.

lanD asseMbly analysis


Summary Notes:

• Map shows parcels differentiated by assessed total value by square footage. Assessed values are from the local appraisal district.

• There are lower values in the NorthernpartofDowntown.

• There are lower values along the river corridor.

• There are lower values near Fort Concho and the Art Museum.

• There are higher values along Bry-ant and the primary highway 67 intersection.

assesseD value analysis


Summary Notes:

• This map measures tax generation potential by comparing assessed improvement values with lot acre-age. Lots with improvements that generate tax revenue are high-lighted in red, and potential tax generating parcels are in green.

• Due to a combination of publicly owned property and vacant/under utilized land, there are large zones of underperforming tax parcels within downtown.

tax generation analysis

30SoUrCeS: City of San angelo, CatalySt

Summary Notes:

• This map shows locally designated historic districts.

• Locally regulated historic districts have effect on what can be done within the downtown core.

loCal regulations


Summary Notes:

• This map combines the elements of development from the previous maps in to blocks.

• Large groupings of redevelopment blocks are at:

-NorthBryantBLVD

-MLKDr.andFarrStreets

-OakesStreet

-AroundFortConcho

-AroundArtMuseum

• These are theoretical and may not prove to be successful based on ownership and adjacency ele-ments.

ease of DevelopMent


Summary Notes:

• This map illustrates clear identity districts based on the following anchors:

- County Facilities

- Shannon Medical Center

- Art Museum

- Fort Concho

- Concho River

- Concho Retailers

- Primary Intersections

• Connecting with these subdis-trict identities will be key to the financingandmarketingoffutureprojects.

iDentity subDistriCts

33SoUrCeS: eSri, City of San angelo, national regiSter of hiStoriC plaCe,

City of San angelo hiStoriC preServation SoCiety, CatalySt

Summary Notes:

• This map shows historic sites as designatedbytheNationalRegis-ter of Historic Places, and the City of San Angelo Historic Preserva-tion Society.

• Newdevelopmentsshouldbeinline with regulation in place to preserve the rich character of these communities.

HistoriC sites


City of San angelo hiStoriC preServation SoCiety,tom green appraiSal DiStriCt, CatalySt

Summary Notes:

• This map layers in additional impacting features that affect new development.

• Additional elements to con-sider beyond historic sites include churches,andhighriseofficebuildings,

• All development will also factor in the100yearfloodplain.

iMpaCting features



Summary Notes:

• This map shows potential op-portunity sites layered in with all impacting features.

• The type and quantity of new real estate investment would be determined by the market demand andrequirementsforspecificsitelocation.

opportunity sites

36SoUrCeS: City of San angelo ComprehenSive plan, CatalySt

Summary Notes:

• The Comprehensive Plan update prepared for the downtown area includes sounds planning concepts that require additional vetting through a market and real estate analysis.

• Thisanalysishasidentifiedad-ditional opportunities beyond the projectareasidentifiedinthePlanupdate.

• This market analysis and related programming concepts provides a more aligned master develop-mentstrategyforspecificprojectswithina10-yeardevelopmentperiod.

existing poliCy

37SoUrCeS: City of San angelo ComprehenSive plan, CatalySt

Summary Notes:

• The programming and market study conducted in this report allow for nuanced development of restaurant,office,andresidentialuses.

• Shannon Medical District and Bryan Gateway are ideally suited forofficeandlightindustrialuses.

• There is opportunity for an ad-ditional restaurant district along Chadbourne.

CoMpreHensive plan upDate DistriCts

Medical District

Riverfront Redev.

Arts/Heritage District

Commercial Improvements

Riverfront Entertainment

Civic Activity District

Highway Commercial

SAISD

Comprehensive Plan Update Districts

Bryant Gateway

Irving Street / City Hall North

River District 1 (Koeningheim – Chadbourne) Central High School District River District 2 (Convention Center Area)

River District 3 – (Oakes – Rio Concho)

Shannon Medical District

reDevelopMent prograMMing

Downtown san angelo

38

39SoUrCeS: CatalySt

Downtown reDevelopMent

-...provideconnectionsbetweenactivities?-...improvepedestrianandvehicularinfrastructure?-...provideorreinforceusableanddefinedopenspace?-...enhancesafetyandcleanliness?-...encourageadditionalredevelopmentandreinvestment?

Restaurant In-Fill Focus AreaThe largest concentration of restaurants in Downtown San Angelo is along Chadbourne Street. Creating contin-ued focus along Chadbourne and within two blocks on the east/west streets that cross Chadbourne will create the momentum needed to reach the critical mass required for amoredefinabledowntownrestaurantdistrict.

ImplementationNote: Tobetterdefineanddirect theseefforts, economic development incentive tools may be uti-lized to offset the relatively high upfront tenant improve-ment costs required for such investment. This may include identifying and presenting these restaurant concepts to recipientsoffederalallocationsofNewMarketsTaxCred-its. The City or downtown interest groups may also assist this process by identifying potential investors interested in buying these tax credits, with a particular focus on com-panies experiencing high gains in the energy sector. This program may be well suited for companies focused on the region’s energy sector in that they would get a double ben-efitfrominvestinginsuchtaxcreditsastheywouldreceivethe credit itself plus the more intangible returns associated with having a more vibrant downtown environment with restaurant and entertainment that will help attract and re-tain their employee base. In addition, the other programs identifiedasUrbanDevelopmentFinanceToolsshowninthis document should be investigated for their applicability as well.

Tobettertargetspecificrestaurantpotential,itissuggest-ed Downtown San Angelo Inc. prepare a restaurant loca-

BackgroundThe redevelopment program presented hereafter is the synthesis of the previous sections. The primary economic drivers in the area (energy sector, ASU, and Goodfellow Air Force Base), are each experiencing growth or contin-ued activity that helps drive additional investment in the San Angelo marketplace. The trade area analysis, in con-junction with the growth experienced by the primary eco-nomic drivers, has identified new development potentialas set out in the land use programming that centers on three themes: continued restaurant and entertainment in-vestment, the addition of workplace and employment uses, and residential infill. Thephysical andpolicy analysisofthedowntownareahasidentifiedvariouslocationsfortheCity, its downtown marketing agents, and property owners to focus efforts towards.

Downtown Focus AreasSpecificeconomicdevelopmentpolicyshouldbecreatedthat focuses such efforts towards the creation of more recognizabledevelopmentsub-districtstobecreatedhav-ingclearregionalidentities.Specifically,therestaurantin-fillfocusshouldbeonandnearChadbourneStreet,(withintwoblocks);newemploymentandofficeinfillshouldoc-cur to the north of Shannon Medical Center, around the rail station depot, and on and near (within two blocks) of the western portion of Harris Street; and residential in-fillactivityshouldbefocusedalongtheConchoRiverandaround the Fort Concho/Art walk area district. All eco-nomic development programs and policies within down-town that are devised to encourage the new investment in these focus areas should be tailored to address the fol-lowing concepts.

Does the policy and activity…-...strengthenthefocusarea’sidentity?-...createpotentialforadditionalbusinessrevenue?

40SoUrCeS: CatalySt


There are additional opportunities around Shannon Medi-calCenterfornewhealth-scienceinfilldevelopment.AndtherearesmallersitesalongWestHarrisforinfillofsingleuserexecutiveofficebuildings.

Implementation Note: Given much of Downtown San Angelo’sexistingcommercial,industrialandofficebuildingstockisolder,orcontainedwithinmoredifficultlandas-semblies, attracting such new investment is much more dif-ficultthantheeffortrequiredtolocatenewconstructiononagreenfieldsitealongtheLoop.Inaddition,theneedsofnewofficeusersaregenerallybeyondtheamenitiesex-istingofficebuildingscanoffer.Assuch,specialeconomicdevelopment tools should be focused to mitigate these difficultiesfornewinvestors,makelocatingindowntownmore economically attractive, and make existing assets more competitive and functional.

Such economic development tools should be targeted to these two user groups. First, any tax abatement that is consideredforusersinanedge-cityconditionshouldalsobe considered forDowntown locations. Secondly,NewMarkets Tax Credits are a tool that can be utilized for both newconstructionandrenovationsofexistingofficebuild-ings downtown. Further, theCity should defineDown-town San Angelo as a special enterprise district that offers small businesses a host of amenities that can be marketed effectively by the Chamber and Downtown San Angelo Inc. These include allowing all downtown businesses to oper-ate within a collected insurance program in which all in-surance needs can be purchased at bulk rates (rather than rates for small operations only), identifying and making available small meeting space at no cost, and other incen-tivesyettobeidentified.Finally,theDowntownTRZ(andtheotherUrbanDevelopmentFinanceToolsidentifiedinthis document) should be utilized to incentivize new site

tion map highlighting all existing restaurants and identifying their cuisine and special activities/capabilities for market-ing purposes. Further, a restaurant programming exercise should be prepared working with existing restaurant own-ers that identifies the existing voids in cuisine tobettertarget new marketing activity towards specific types ofrestaurant investment to generate a stronger critical mass and selection for the broader marketplace.

Work Place In-Fill Focus AreaThe largest driver of new employment in the San Angelo region is those companies associated with the energy sec-tor. Targeted effort should be made on attracting these new employers to sites in the Downtown footprint rather than in the more traditional locations being developed on the periphery of the City. This is the case for such de-velopment on the edge does not capitalize on the critical mass in use and activity their employees can experience in Downtown. They are required to leave these areas to have lunch, acquire services, etc. that locating in Down-townwouldoffer.FromtheCity’sperspective,suchinfilldevelopment in Downtown will introduce new daytime population that will further momentum in retail, service and restaurant investment, and will bring the added recog-nition that will strengthen San Angelo’s Downtown iden-tityasaregionalcenterofmixed-useexperiencethatcanadvance the City’s brand itself.

The opportunity sites analysis highlights four areas for such new investment. First, the existing office buildingsin San Angelo are equipped to handle more conventional officeinfillandshouldbemarketedassuch.Second,thereare underutilized properties on the entire north side of downtown and around the railroad line that can accom-modate larger footprint new development in which of-ficemayfrontthestreetwithstorageandparkingbehind.

41SoUrCeS: CatalySt


FinanceTools identified in this document) should be fo-cused to assist in the payback of certain site improvements that further the larger goal of interconnectivity and public spaces in these areas.

development in the areas of Downtown’s northern zone.

HousingInfillFocusAreaTheanalysishasidentifiedtwoareassuitableforimmedi-ateinfillofvariousresidentialproductswithindowntown.The neighborhoods surrounding the Arts Walk and His-toricFortConchoareripeforlowerdensityinfilldevel-opmentthat includessmall lotsingle-family,attachedsin-gle-family and townhomes, and lowerdensitymultifamilyon primary corridors. The properties along the Concho Riverholdimmediatepotentialfortheinfillofmediumandhigher density multifamily development, so long as these are implemented utilizing a higher quality standard of ex-terior masonry materials and architectural designs that compliment adjacent downtown structures. The addition ofanewresidentialnight-timepopulationwillfurtherthegoals for strengthened commercial development in down-town and provide a new population and activity that will helpfurtherDowntown’sidentityasaregionalmixed-usedestination.

Implementation Note: Housing development in and around the riverfront will carry higher site costs and mate-rialstandardsinherentandnecessaryinthishigh-visibilityarea. Such development will also carry costs associated with maintaining a fully connected public access with ac-companying improved open spaces. As these higher costs add higher risk to the initial investors, and given such on-going development will require initial private successes to provide new comparables that future/on-going develop-ments will require, the City and related groups such as the San Angelo Health Foundation may help mitigate this higher cost of development by making their lands available for purchase or ground lease at rates conducive to such initial development. Further, the downtown tax increment reinvestment program (and the other Urban Development



investMent ConCept 1: restaurant infill

In the next ten years Downtown San Angelo has demand for six new restaurants. Locating restaurants along and near Chadbourne Street will create the critical mass need-edforamoredefinedrestaurantdistrict.

The City of San Angelo should coordinate an effort to identify current cuisine options, and encourage a more di-verse restaurant offering downtown through addition of new restaurant types. This should be done in close coor-dination with Downtown San Angelo Inc. and the existing

restaurant owners. This should lead towards a collected marketing campaign for Downtown’s restaurant and en-tertainment establishments.

These efforts should be economically incentivized to achieve initial catalytic investment.

Development standards should be enhanced to include tenant improvement and signage criteria aimed to create a stronger visual presence for restaurants Downtown.



Summary Notes:

• This Chadbourne Area map identi-fiesspecificparcelsthatmayholdpotentialfornewrestaurantin-fill.These are presented for informa-tional and programming purposes only and should not be considered mandates for redevelopment or acquisition.

• Please refer to the following pages and note the map ID to cross reference parcels with ownership data.

restaurant infill zone parCels

45

6

7

13

11109

3

12

12

8

30

31

28

29

32

33

181716

15

25 26 27

41403938

373635

34

42

22

43 44

53

525150

494847

46

45

14

2423

212020

19

54

Source: Esri, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, GeoEye, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, and the GIS UserCommunity, Copyright:© 2012 Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, TomTom

µ0 280 560140

Feet

Chadbourne AreaParcels

Appraisal District Parcels

Oakes St

44SoUrCeS: City of San angelo, tom green appraiSal DiStriCt, CatalySt


Map ID Tax ID Total Appraised Value Owner Owner Phone Number Owner Street Owner City Owner State Owner Zip Acreage SF $ / SF1 2341800600000500 49,150$ West John J (325) 655-8181 PO BOX 1329 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.11 5,001 9.83$ 2 2341800600000400 40,500$ West John J (325) 655-8181 PO BOX 1329 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.09 3,750 10.80$ 3 2341800600000100 -$ First Baptist Church (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.36 15,625 -$ 4 2341800600001100 31,300$ Chadwick Properties Ltd (325) 651-6326 6002 WINNERS CIR SAN ANGELO TX 76904 0.16 7,068 4.43$ 5 2341800600001300 33,000$ Chadwick Properties Ltd (325) 651-6326 6002 WINNERS CIR SAN ANGELO TX 76904 0.07 2,833 11.65$ 6 2341800600001400 24,050$ Chadwick Properties Ltd (325) 651-6326 22 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.13 5,500 4.37$ 7 2341800600001500 153,300$ Capador Springs Lp / K&M Springs (325) 651-0344 212 CEDARWOOD SAN ANGELO TX 76905 0.13 5,500 27.87$ 8 2341700007001500 -$ First United Methodist Church Of SA (325) 655-8981 37 E BEAUREGARD AVE SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.44 19,261 -$ 9 2341700007001700 113,450$ V Square Properties / Robert Meyer (325) 944-7714 2104 DOUGLAS DR SAN ANGELO TX 76904 0.07 3,250 34.91$

10 2341700007001600 98,050$ Hopkins Timothy (325) 658-1511 121 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.07 3,250 30.17$ 11 2341700007000400 61,250$ Daniel Susan Merle 118 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.07 3,250 18.85$ 12 2341700007000400 131,700$ Daniel Susan Merle 118 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.07 3,250 40.52$ 13 2341700007000100 59,700$ One East Twohig Partnership 1 E TWOHIG 2ND FLOOR SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.37 16,250 3.67$ 14 2341700001003100 299,600$ One East Twohig Partnership 1 E TWOHIG SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.10 4,500 66.58$ 15 2341700001003200 58,450$ Fickling Georgina L 2610 A & M SAN ANGELO TX 76904 0.09 3,750 15.59$ 16 2341700001003400 74,850$ Swa Gito LLC (325) 653-2582 204 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.09 3,750 19.96$ 17 2341700001003300 9,000$ Rogers Hicks & Rogers Properties LP (325) 653-8095 210 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.07 3,001 3.00$ 18 2341700001002300 122,650$ Rogers Hicks & Rogers Properties LP (325) 653-8095 210 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.09 3,750 32.71$ 19 2341700001002200 60,050$ Rogers Hicks & Rogers Properties LP (325) 653-8095 1326 KENWOOD DR SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.09 3,750 16.01$ 20 2341700001002000 40,350$ Choate Guy & Eva Moutos-Choate (325) 653-6866 PO BOX 1271 SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.09 3,750 10.76$ 20 2341700001002100 37,250$ Choate Eva Mouto & Guy D PO BOX 1271 SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.09 3,750 9.93$ 21 2341700001001700 9,100$ 7 West Twohig Partnership 201 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.15 6,500 1.40$ 22 2341700001001600 -$ City of San Angelo (325) 657-4241 PO BOX 1751 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.02 1,000 -$ 23 2341700001001800 22,500$ 7 West Twohig Partnership 201 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.17 7,500 3.00$ 24 2341700001000200 47,100$ Cranek Lindsay (325) 651-6951 547 CEDARWOOD SAN ANGELO TX 76905 0.05 2,010 23.43$ 25 2341700001000100 70,100$ Liberty Cafe LLC 3619 S JACKSON ST SAN ANGELO TX 76904 0.10 4,385 15.99$ 26 2341700001000300 96,200$ Fleming Dan & Maylyn 9895 BENSON ROAD MENARD TX 76859 0.09 3,896 24.69$ 27 2341700001000500 44,200$ Jewell Larry C Sr Dec&Patricia Anne 1319 S OAKES SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.06 2,590 17.07$



Map ID Tax ID Total Appraised Value Owner Owner Phone Number Owner Street Owner City Owner State Owner Zip Acreage SF $ / SF28 2341700013001700 65,400$ Mohler Buster & Marilyn & Jay 1 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.13 5,600 11.68$ 29 2341700013001600 340,350$ Citicorp North America INC (800) 788-0002 PO BOX 30508 TAMPA FL 33630 0.63 27,651 12.31$ 30 2341700013000200 273,200$ Reising Contracting LLC (817) 488-0077 2221 E CONTINENTAL # 140 SOUTHLAKE TX 76092 0.56 24,405 11.19$ 31 2341700013000300 8,800$ Chadwick Properties Ltd (325) 651-6326 6002 WINNERS CIR SAN ANGELO TX 76904 0.06 2,500 3.52$ 32 2341700013000100 269,400$ Chadwick Properties Ltd (325) 651-6326 6002 WINNERS CIR SAN ANGELO TX 76904 0.25 11,000 24.49$ 33 2341700008002900 126,900$ Fuentes John & Elizabeth (325) 658-2430 101 S CHADBOURNE ST SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.12 5,331 23.81$ 34 2341700008002800 91,500$ Strain Michael & Michelle L (325) 655-6615 107 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.11 4,671 19.59$ 35 2341700008001500 125,500$ Jett Robert W & Harris Robert H 4603 S JACKSON SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.23 10,001 12.55$ 36 2341700008001400 34,100$ Lemmons Benjamin David & Ladell 113 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.06 2,500 13.64$ 37 2341700008001350 34,600$ Juice Mule Inc 1649 BECKER LANE SAN ANGELO TX 76904 0.06 2,500 13.84$ 38 2341700008001300 58,200$ Vincent John B & Brandi N 5102 BEVERLY DR SAN ANGELO TX 76904 0.09 4,000 14.55$ 39 2341700008001100 161,400$ Vincent John B & Brandi N 5102 BEVERLY DR SAN ANGELO TX 76904 0.21 9,126 17.69$ 40 2341700008001200 55,700$ Cox Phyllis (325) 658-3434 123 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.06 2,500 22.28$ 41 2341700008000100 55,700$ Cox Phyllis (325) 658-3434 123 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.06 2,500 22.28$ 42 2341700008000200 145,750$ Rufenacht John E & Martha T (325) 944-0967 3939 HATCHERY ROAD SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.17 7,501 19.43$ 43 4076110000000100 239,900$ 7 West Twohig Partnership 201 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.23 9,977 24.04$ 44 4076110000000200 186,600$ 7 West Twohig Partnership 201 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.23 9,977 18.70$ 45 2341700002001600 3,000$ 7 West Twohig Partnership 201 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.14 6,043 0.50$ 46 2341700002001700 82,800$ Wilde Walter W & Joyce M (325) 651-7744 20 E CONCHO SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.11 5,000 16.56$ 47 2341700002001500 24,600$ Wilde Walter W & Joyce M (325) 651-7744 20 E CONCHO SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.11 4,612 5.33$ 48 2341700002001150 52,400$ Engle Garrick N 4325 GOODNIGHT TRAIL SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.05 2,000 26.20$ 49 2341700002001300 22,000$ Dorner Cheryl (325) 655-4495 219 S CHADBOURNE ST SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.05 2,001 11.00$ 50 2341700002001200 48,550$ Stango Stephen P Jr (325) 659-8999 221 S Chadbourn ST SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.10 4,210 11.53$ 51 2341700002001400 27,000$ Valva Enterprises LLC 3435 CEDAR RIDGE LANE SAN ANGELO TX 76904 0.05 2,075 13.01$ 52 2341700002000200 21,100$ Valva Enterprises LLC 3435 CEDAR RIDGE LANE SAN ANGELO TX 76904 0.04 1,590 13.27$ 53 2341700002000100 20,100$ White Elizabeth Lou P PO BOX 62116 SAN ANGELO TX 76906 0.24 10,625 1.89$ 54 2341700002000400 91,400$ Wilde Joyce (325) 651-7744 20 E CONCHO SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.49 21,561 4.24$



investMent ConCept 2: workplaCe infill

The yellow circles indicate opportunities for lower density and light industrial infill potential fornewenergy sectoruses. The orange circle is better suited for medium density officeuses,includingandnotlimitedtomedicaluses.

The City of San Angelo, in conjunction with the Cham-ber of Commerce and Downtown San Angelo Inc, should prepare a small business action plan that aims to provide certain amenities special to downtown employment uses thatdecreaseoperatingexpenses,increaseefficiency,and

add to a stronger workplace experience.



Summary Notes:

• This Shannon Medical District Map reflectsalltheadjacentparcelsto the medical center, which may bebestusedforofficeandhealthscience uses. These are presented for informational and program-ming purposes only and should not be considered mandates for redevelopment or acquisition.


workplaCe infill ConCept -- sHannon MeDiCal Center

DistriCt

6968

72

48

6465

66

5350

5155

57 6162

63

67

70 71

73

74 75

76

5859

92

9179

8182 83

78

8788

89 90

85

39

2930

47

45

46

38

36

31 32 33 34

35

4041

42 44

2223 24

25

2827

26

4337

1

8

1011

9

12

1415

1613

6

17

181920

7

5

43

2

21

86

84

77

54


µ0 430 860215

Feet

Shannon Medical AreaParcels




DistriCt

Map ID Tax ID Total Appraised Value Owner Owner Phone Number Owner Street Owner City Owner State Owner Zip Acreage SF $ / SF1 1934300003300400 -$ SAN ANGELO ISD (325) 947-3838 1621 University Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76904 0.80 34,711 -$ 2 2546700000200300 -$ FRIENDS OF RECOVERY INC (325) 657-0016 Po Box 250 N Magdalen SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.75 32,529 -$ 3 2546700000200500 118,300$ POLK TERRY D & MARY DARLENE 221 N Magdalen St SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.20 8,644 596,137.39$ 4 2546700000200700 53,100$ BOWLES JOE H 215 N Magdalen St SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.18 8,050 287,326.19$ 5 2546700000200800 19,300$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.37 16,108 52,190.37$ 6 2546700000200900 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.43 18,733 -$ 7 2546700000200600 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.48 20,910 -$ 8 1934300003200100 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.27 11,573 -$ 9 1934300003200200 42,600$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.73 31,949 58,081.97$

10 1934300003100200 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.54 23,434 -$ 11 1934300003200100 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.07 3,047 -$ 12 1934300003100100 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.35 15,128 -$ 13 2341700022501000 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.30 13,211 -$ 14 2341700022500900 33,000$ FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH (325) 653-4523 29 N Oakes St SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.25 11,000 130,676.38$ 15 2341700022500800 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.33 14,429 -$ 16 2341700022500500 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.77 33,495 -$ 17 2341700022500400 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.31 13,363 -$ 18 2341700022500300 18,000$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.21 9,000 87,117.77$ 19 2341700022500200 15,000$ L & D FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1512 Darlene Dr SAN ANGELO TX 76904 0.17 7,500 87,117.64$ 20 2341700022500100 18,750$ L & D FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1512 Darlene Dr SAN ANGELO TX 76904 0.17 7,500 108,897.05$ 21 2343180000100100 1,292,400$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 3.88 168,957 333,203.36$ 22 2341700021501200 26,900$ MARTINEZ ARMANDO G (325) 653-5640 215 W Avenue N SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.17 7,277 161,024.76$ 23 2341700021501100 12,950$ STEPHENSON MARVIN B 1823 Edmund Blvd SAN ANGELO TX 76901 0.21 9,085 62,089.81$ 24 2341700021501000 14,600$ BAUTISTA RUDY C JR & JEANNIE 123 N Main E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.17 7,241 87,825.48$ 25 2341700021500900 40,800$ BAUTISTA RUDY C JR 123 N Main SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.16 7,007 253,634.83$ 26 2341700021500800 24,900$ MIRANDA RICHARD N & MICHELLE C 107 N Main St SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.26 11,187 96,956.79$ 27 2341700021500700 72,500$ MIRANDA RICHARD N & MICHELLE C 107 N Main St SAN ANGELO TX 76901 0.18 7,705 409,869.33$ 28 2341700021500600 42,300$ CABRERA YOLANDA & PARRA JOHNNY 915 Preusser SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.21 9,154 201,291.94$ 29 2341700021000100 -$ SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.33 14,484 -$ 30 2341700021000200 -$ SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.25 11,007 -$ 31 2341700021000300 113,700$ SAN ANGELO NEUROSURGICAL ASSN (325) 655-4164 211 E College Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.23 10,157 487,618.22$ 32 2341700021000400 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.24 10,350 -$



DistriCt

Map ID Tax ID Total Appraised Value Owner Owner Phone Number Owner Street Owner City Owner State Owner Zip Acreage SF $ / SF33 2341700021000500 20,600$ SAN ANGELO NEUROSURGICAL ASSN (325) 655-4164 211 E College Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.18 7,687 116,737.10$ 34 2341700021000600 26,250$ SAN ANGELO NEUROSURGICAL ASSN (325) 655-4164 211 E College Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.22 9,564 119,561.98$ 35 2341700021000900 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.28 12,388 -$ 36 2341700021500100 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.21 9,316 -$ 37 2341700021000700 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.14 6,300 -$ 38 2341700021500300 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.06 2,477 -$ 39 2341700021001800 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.68 29,435 -$ 40 2341700021001600 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.44 18,999 -$ 41 2341700021001500 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES INC (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.44 18,999 -$ 42 2341700021001200 211,300$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES INC (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.44 18,999 484,467.50$ 43 2341700021001000 20,300$ SANCHEZ MARIO & DALIA 232 Copperwood Dr LAKESIDE TX 76108 0.08 3,432 257,675.67$ 44 2341700021001100 113,950$ REGAL OIL INC (325) 658-7521 Po Box 950 N Main SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.29 12,727 390,022.20$ 45 2343180001400100 -$ SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 2.49 108,352 -$ 46 2341700015000600 75,250$ WINGER MARK (325) 655-8374 Po Box 60226 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76906 0.37 16,160 202,842.50$ 47 2343180001500200 -$ SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.27 11,709 -$ 48 2342000800001100 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.10 4,167 -$ 49 2342000800001000 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.05 2,083 -$ 50 2342000800000900 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.05 2,083 -$ 51 2342000800000800 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.05 2,083 -$ 52 2342000800000700 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF SAN ANGELO (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.08 3,542 -$ 53 2342000800001200 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF SAN ANGELO (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.19 8,264 -$ 54 2342000800001600 -$ FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH-SAN ANGELO (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 1.77 77,224 -$ 55 2342000800000600 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH SAN ANGELO INC (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.10 4,167 -$ 56 2342000800000500 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.05 2,375 -$ 57 2342000800000400 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.05 2,375 -$ 58 2342000800002100 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH SAN ANGELO INC (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.08 3,461 -$ 59 2342000800001400 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF SAN ANGELO (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.05 2,000 -$ 60 2342000800001300 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH SAN ANGELO INC (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.01 622 -$ 61 2342000800000300 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.09 3,834 -$ 62 2342000800000200 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH TRUSTEES (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.08 3,666 -$ 63 2342000800000100 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH TRUSTEES (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.34 14,999 -$ 64 2342000800001900 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.67 29,000 -$



DistriCt

Map ID Tax ID Total Appraised Value Owner Owner Phone Number Owner Street Owner City Owner State Owner Zip Acreage SF $ / SF65 2342000800001800 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.52 22,501 -$ 66 2342000800001700 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.31 13,500 -$ 67 2341800600000600 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.03 1,250 -$ 68 2341800600000200 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.00 188 -$ 69 2341800600000300 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.00 188 -$ 70 2341800600000700 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH (325) 655-4101 37 E Harris SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.11 4,750 -$ 71 2341800600000800 115,450$ TALLEY PATRICIA B 3706 Inglewood Dr SAN ANGELO TX 76904 0.33 14,250 352,903.87$ 72 2341800600000900 -$ FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH (325) 655-4101 Po Box 2138 SAN ANGELO TX 76902 1.12 48,926 -$ 73 2341800600001800 20,800$ ESTES & SIDENER LEASING CO (325) 655-6936 16 E Beauregard SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.13 5,663 160,003.79$ 74 2341800600001600 159,400$ ANGELO REALTY PARTNERS LTD Po Box 5891 E Beauregard SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.10 4,279 1,622,728.95$ 75 2341800600001700 234,100$ ESTES & SIDENER LEASING CO (325) 655-6936 16 E Beauregard SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.10 4,309 2,366,602.72$ 76 2341800600001000 -$ ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE - SAN ANGELO (325) 651-7500 Po Box 1829 S Oakes SAN ANGELO TX 76902 1.31 57,002 -$ 77 2341700006001500 -$ FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH (325) 655-8981 37 E Beauregard Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.72 31,501 -$ 78 2341700006001800 -$ ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE - SAN ANGELO (325) 651-7500 Po Box 1829 S Oakes SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.10 4,500 -$ 79 2341700006001400 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.21 9,000 -$ 80 2341700006001300 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.21 9,000 -$ 81 2341700006001200 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.21 9,000 -$ 82 2341700006001100 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.21 9,000 -$ 83 2341700006001000 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.41 18,000 -$ 84 2341700006001900 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES INC (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.49 21,502 -$ 85 2341700006000100 -$ MASONIC LODGE (325) 655-3790 130 S Oakes St SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.23 10,000 -$ 86 2341700006000200 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.13 5,500 -$ 87 2341700006000300 38,300$ WADE WILLIAM C Po Box 224 E Twohig LAKE JACKSON TX 77566 0.18 8,000 208,535.07$ 88 2341700006000400 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.25 11,001 -$ 89 2341700006000500 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.21 9,000 -$ 90 2341700006000600 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.34 15,001 -$ 91 2341700006000900 -$ SHANNON REAL ESTATE SERVICES (325) 481-6080 120 E Harris Ave SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.11 5,001 -$ 92 2341700006000700 165,600$ FOX FISH & SABLE REALTY CORP 100 Bramble Brook Rd ARDSLEY NY 10502 0.34 15,002 480,839.43$



investMent ConCept 3: resiDential infill

The yellow circle highlights lower density housing oppor-tunities that can leverage the nearby cultural and historic amenitiestowardsthecreationofamorevibrantin-towncommunity.

The orange circle highlights medium density housing op-portunities around the Concho River that can leverage this riverfront location to better connect downtown to the Arts and Historic District, provide new gateways into Downtown, and create a stronger Concho River zone.


All developments should be designed to enhance the his-toric, cultural, and community features of the adjacent ar-eas.


Summary Notes:

• This Concho River District map shows potential development areas for medium density housing. These are presented for informa-tional and programming purposes only and should not be considered mandates for redevelopment or acquisition.


• These efforts should be economi-cally incentivized to achieve initial catalytic investment.

resiDential infill zone -- ConCHo riverfront

20

27

30

5

33

28

6

4

45

321

42

38

25 43

34

19

41

23

29

26

31

22 21

18

37

39

35

2440

36

44

32

714

1516

98

1112 13

1017


µ0 450 900225

Feet

Concho River AreaParcels


Oakes St

Avenue A


Summary Notes:

• Properties fronting the Concho River are ideally located to allow the creation of a medium density residential community with direct access to Downtown’s retail, restaurant and cultural user core, near the City’s employment an-chors, and focused on strengthen-ing the riverfront experience.

• Development on both sides of the river will leverage the City’s recent investments in the nearby public spaces and artwork, will provide pleasant views both to and from downtown, and provide a critical mass of ongoing residents that will further support downtown busi-nesses.


AB

B2

C2C

D

E

F

G


Summary Notes:

• This bird’s eye view of anticipated improvements is taken from a viewpoint just east of the Art Museum looking northwest across the Concho River area. It shows the intent to deliver an urban ex-perience to this important area in a manner that better connects the City’s art and historic resources to the downtown retail and res-taurant core through a residential riverfront.




Tax ID Total Appraised Value Owner Owner Phone Number Owner Street Owner City Owner State Owner Zip Acreage SF $ / SF1 1123200004700100 45,445$ SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION (325) 486-0185 PO BOX 3550 W AVENUE A SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.5216377 22722.54 2.00$ 2 1123200004700200 47,518$ SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION (325) 486-0185 PO BOX 3550 W AVENUE A SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.5454315 23759 2.00$ 3 1123200004700300 49,569$ SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION (325) 486-0185 PO BOX 3550 W AVENUE A SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.5689783 24784.69 2.00$ 4 1123200004700400 51,373$ SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION (325) 486-0185 426 W AVE B SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.5896799 25686.46 2.00$ 5 2443210004700100 81,052$ SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION (325) 486-0185 426 W AVE B SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.9303544 40526.24 2.00$

274,958$ 3.1560819 137478.9 2.00$

B1 6 2036900004801100 73,127$ SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION (325) 486-0185 419 S IRVING SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.8393819 36563.47 2.00$ (1.13 acres) 73,127$ 0.8393819 36563.47 2.00$

7 2036900004801000 66,000$ MAYFIELD PAPER CO (325) 653-1444 PO BOX 3889 W Avenue A SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.4958851 21600.75 3.06$ 8 2036900004800100 5,000$ SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION (325) 486-0185 419 S IRVING SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.0573938 2500.073 2.00$ 9 2036900004800200 5,000$ SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION (325) 486-0185 419 S IRVING SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.057394 2500.083 2.00$

10 2036900004800300 5,000$ SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION (325) 486-0185 419 S IRVING SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.0573933 2500.051 2.00$ 11 2036900004800400 5,000$ SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION (325) 486-0185 419 S IRVING SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.057394 2500.083 2.00$ 12 2036900004800500 5,000$ SAN ANGELO HEALTH FOUNDATION (325) 486-0185 419 S IRVING SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.057394 2500.081 2.00$ 13 2036900004800600 38,000$ SINSEL THOMAS PO BOX 2064 S Irving AUSTIN TX 78768 0.0573936 2500.064 15.20$ 14 2036900004800700 17,750$ SINSEL THOMAS PO BOX 2064 S Irving AUSTIN TX 78768 0.1147875 5000.143 3.55$ 15 2036900004800800 19,600$ FARRIS W B III & JANICE Y 5362 ATLANTIC RD SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.1147875 5000.143 3.92$ 16 2036900004800900 8,200$ WILLIAMS VILLARREAL LP 1500 RANKIN HWY MIDLAND TX 79701 0.1079887 4703.989 1.74$

174,551$ 1.1778114 51305.46 3.40$

17 313400000000600 420,600$ BAYOU CITY BROADCASTING LLC (281) 719-9355 406 S IRVING SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.5393414 23493.71 17.90$ 18 313400000000350 7,300$ BAYOU CITY BROADCASTING LLC (281) 719-9355 406 S IRVING SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.0953468 4153.308 1.76$ 19 313400000000300 98,500$ GRIFFIN FRED L (325) 486-8661 434 S IRVING ST SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.5060592 22043.94 4.47$ 20 313400000000500 275,787$ CITY OF SAN ANGELO (325) 657-4241 PO BOX 1751 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76902 3.1656046 137893.7 2.00$

802,187$ 4.306352 187584.7 4.28$

21 2341600000000100 43,000$ 333 CHADBOURNE LLC (972) 233-1566 119 S IRVING SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.223836 9750.294 4.41$ 22 2341700200000400 48,350$ 333 CHADBOURNE LLC (972) 233-1566 119 S IRVING SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.3214049 14000.4 3.45$ 23 2341700200000500 35,300$ A T & T COMMUNICATIONS OF TEXAS LTD 909 CHESTNUT ST RM 36-M-1 ST LOUIS MO 63101 0.3730598 16250.48 2.17$ 24 2341700200000600 20,100$ A T & T COMMUNICATIONS OF TEXAS LTD 909 CHESTNUT ST RM 36-M-1 ST LOUIS MO 63101 0.2008783 8750.257 2.30$

146,750$ 1.1191789 48751.43 3.01$

Map ID

B2C

DA



Tax ID Total Appraised Value Owner Owner Phone Number Owner Street Owner City Owner State Owner Zip Acreage SF $ / SF

E 25 2341700300000700 219,050$ COOPER RAYMOND L & FAYE (325) 655-9553 29 E CONCHO AVE SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.6887244 30000.84 7.30$ 219,050$ 0.6887244 30000.84 7.30$

26 2341700300000100 30,824$ CITY OF SAN ANGELO - TRUSTEE (325) 657-4241 PO BOX 1751 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.3538161 15412.23 2.00$ 27 2341700300000200 255,993$ CITY OF SAN ANGELO (325) 657-4241 PO BOX 1751 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76902 2.9383931 127996.4 2.00$ 28 2341700300000500 123,844$ FREEDOM FELLOWSHIP SAN ANGELO INC (325) 227-4121 6018 LYNDHURST DR SAN ANGELO TX 76901 1.4215298 61921.84 2.00$ 29 2341700300000600 31,681$ CITY OF SAN ANGELO (325) 657-4241 PO BOX 1751 SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.3636504 15840.61 2.00$

442,342$ 5.0773894 221171.1 2.00$

30 2341700400000100 161,631$ CITY OF SAN ANGELO (325) 657-4241 PO BOX 1751 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76902 1.8552729 80815.69 2.00$ 31 2341700400000400 29,000$ EGGEMEYER BOBBY (325) 655-1166 35 E CONCHO SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.3236413 14097.81 2.06$ 32 2341700400000500 500$ CONCHO CROSSING (325) 653-1154 1500 SHAFTER SAN ANGELO TX 76901 0.0359937 1567.885 0.32$ 33 2341700400000200 412,500$ ELCO LLC (325) 655-8933 5950 US HIGHWAY 87 N SAN ANGELO TX 76901 1.5135776 65931.44 6.26$

603,631$ 3.7284855 162412.8 3.72$

34 1323500000000100 48,400$ EGGEMEYER BOBBY (325) 655-1166 350 S OAKES ST SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.6240004 27181.46 1.78$ 35 1323500000000200 51,950$ Harrison O D III & Ronny Et Al (325) 944-3089 2200 DOUGLAS DR SAN ANGELO TX 76904 0.2538816 11059.08 4.70$ 36 1323500000000400 7,700$ Harrison O D III & Ronny Et Al (325) 944-3089 2200 DOUGLAS DR SAN ANGELO TX 76904 0.0787663 3431.062 2.24$ 37 1323500000000300 10,100$ Gilman Donald M & Norma Braden (325) 658-1071 140 ALLEN SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.279263 12164.7 0.83$ 38 1323500000000500 27,000$ Gilman Donald M & Norma Braden (325) 658-1071 140 ALLEN SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.7891944 34377.31 0.79$ 39 1323500000000700 6,000$ Gilman Donald M & Norma Braden (325) 658-1071 140 ALLEN SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.2698764 11755.82 0.51$ 40 1323500000000600 54,400$ Gilman Donald & Norma (325) 658-1071 140 ALLEN SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.1147874 5000.14 10.88$ 41 1323500000000800 60,300$ Gilman Donald & Norma (325) 658-1071 140 ALLEN SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.4722845 20572.71 2.93$ 42 1323500000000900 68,700$ Gilman Donald M & Norma (325) 658-1071 140 ALLEN SAN ANGELO TX 76903 0.8183273 35646.34 1.93$ 43 1323500000001000 62,350$ Alvarado Evelyn (325) 658-9015 8077 WILLOW LANE SAN ANGELO TX 76901 0.6623058 28850.04 2.16$ 44 1323500000001100 3,298$ City Of San Angelo (325) 657-4241 PO BOX 1751 S CHADBOURNE SAN ANGELO TX 76902 0.037856 1649.009 2.00$ 45 1323500000001200 10,000$ Johnson Mark A & Eustis Stevan D (325) 482-8610 PO BOX 5898 ALLEN BROWNSVILLE TX 78523 0.9635322 41971.46 0.24$

410,198$ 5.3640755 233659.1 1.76$

HF

G

Map ID

Note: All yellow highlighted figures do not have tax rates. They each assume a land value of $2.00/sf.

57image anD text SoUrCeS: google earth ,CatalySt

Summary Notes:

• Financing tools include Public and Private options.

• Public options include local, state, and federal sources.

• Privatefinancingcanhelpfillinthe gaps, and allow for additional investment dollars to the area.

• Debt is available, as long as there is a match in equity.

eConoMiC DevelopMent tools

Public Financing - StateLow Income Housing Tax CreditsHistoric Rehabilitation Tax CreditsCommunity Development TaxCommunity Development Assistance (CDA)

Public Financing - FederalFed. Historic Pres. Invest. Tax CreditsCommunity Development Block GrantJobTrainingPartnershipAct(JTPA)Economic Development Administration (EDA)

Private FinancingPrivate EquityPrivate DebtLendingPools-SharedRiskCommunity Reinvestment ActLand Donation (Quasi)Public Improvement District (PID)HUD 221(d)(4)CDBG Section 108NewMarketsTaxCredits

Thefollowingrepresentsavailablefinancetoolsthathavebeen successfully utilized by other Texas communities in the redevelopment of target areas. Each of these programs should be studied further to determine their applicability to creating a stronger Downtown San Angelo.

Public Financing - LocalTax Increment FinancingLandDonation/Write-DownIndustrialDevelopmentProgram(NIFA)Development Fee RebatesInfrastructure Cost ParticipationSales Tax SharingLow Interest Loans / SubordinationProperty Tax AbatementTax Exempt FinancingLeveraged Infrastructure Funding Façade Maintenance Loan ProgramPredevelopment Funding GrantsEncourageandSupportNonprofitDevelopers


ConClusionDowntown San Angelo, through strategic planning, policy, andfinancingefforts,ispositionedtoleveragethecurrenteconomic climate into a positive redevelopment strategy.

Such redevelopment efforts should be targeted towards specificinvestmentsandfocusareas.Thisanalysissuggeststheseeffortsbeparticulartoinducingrestaurant,energy-sector employment, and new housing over the next 10 years.

Partnerships made between the City of San Angelo, the Chamber of Commerce, Downtown San Angelo Inc., His-toric San Angelo, local businesses, and the private sector should be made to facilitate new development that can strengthenDowntownasamixed-useandmixed-activityregional destination that is active in the daytime through thenight-time.

City of San Angelo

Memo


To: Mayor and Council members

From: AJ Fawver, AICP, Interim Director or Development Services

Subject: consider petition for possible annexation (to San Angelo’s City

limits) of certain property situated in southwest San Angelo

Location: area encompassing a 4 acre tract extending southwest from

Southland Boulevard and located directly east of an 8.995 acre tract annexed to the City Limits on March 5, 2013 that comprises the Prestonwood Addition, Section Two in the southwest part of the city, as shown in attached exhibit

Contacts: AJ Fawver, AICP

Interim Director of Development Services 657-4210

Caption: Discussion and consideration of petition seeking annexation (to San

Angelo’s City limits) of certain property situated directly north, south, east and west of San Angelo and encompassing a vacant 4 acre tract extending southwest from Southland Boulevard and located directly east of an 8.995 acre tract annexed to the City Limits on March 5, 2013 that comprised the Prestonwood Addition, Section Two.

Summary:

The City staff recommends that, if the City Council chooses to accept the petition for annexing all 4 acres highlighted on the attached map, that the City Council also adopt the attached draft timetable for completing such annexation.

City staff was presented with a petition for annexation of the property described above and specifically shown in the attached exhibits. A copy of the petition is also included within the exhibits. The property in question is entirely vacant, uninhabited and free of any structures. It is situated adjacent to annexed property on all sides. This includes Southland Boulevard, which bounds the property to the east, Mills Pass Drive, located adjacent south/southeast of the subject property, a growing residential subdivision known as the Prestonwood Addition, Section 2, Lots 1-8 to the west, northwest, and the Community of Faith subdivision, Section 1, Block 1, Lot 1, to the north/northeast. On March 5, 2013 an 8.995 acre tract comprising what is known as the Prestonwood Addition Section Two, was annexed into the City Limits. This is relevant because when the annexation petition was first presented to City Council on April 2, 2013, a general discussion was held during this meeting with regard to the subject property currently petitioning for annexation as it represented a tract of unincorporated land surrounded by annexed property. The question of whether the owner would be willing to annex the property was asked. Planning staff was then directed to approach the landowner regarding the annexation process since it was explained during the meeting that a City-initiated petition would be a longer and more extensive process. By accepting the petition and adopting a calendar of annexation proceedings as prescribed under Chapter 43 of the Texas Local Government Code, City Council will initiate a process that may be completed as early as March 4, 2014. The Local Government Code authorizes cities to annex sparsely occupied areas on petition of the area's landowner(s). This section (43.028) only applies to the annexation of areas that meet the following criteria:

(1) is one-half mile or less in width; (2) is within the ETJ (Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction) of the city; (3) is vacant and without residents, or on which fewer than three qualified voters reside; (4) is contiguous to the annexing city.

Analysis of Proposed Annexation:

It is essential that the foundation statement of the 2009 Comprehensive Plan be considered in context of considering annexations, specifically that:

"Rapid land use expansion and recent annexations have affected the identity of the City and established a new development pattern that is fiscally unsustainable."

This Plan provides guidance for annexation, many of which are relevant to this scenario. First, the plan establishes a goal stating that the City should "annex areas before extensive development of home sites and business properties occurs, guiding any such development within a framework of municipal regulations on zoning, subdivision, signs, fire prevention and building construction." This excerpt is relevant in this situation, because the area is vacant, and thus, no such development is in place. However, this argument alone is not compelling enough on its own – annexation of this property given that all contiguous surrounding properties have been annexed so annexation here would therefore ensure

logical area development and could potentially be beneficial for placement of public utilities and avoid possible confusion for emergency responders. Thus, this request represents infill as opposed to annexing land that essentially continues to push City Limits away from the city center, thereby being the first step in ensuring the best use of the land. The Comprehensive Plan goes on to state that it is important to "identify specific areas where...annexation may be useful for incorporating expected new development...within City limits, especially where an infrastructure of water utilities already exists." In this area, a network of water and sewer mains, available for extension, are in existence, serving annexed area properties such as Bonham Elementary School and the Prestonwood Addition, Section One.

Financial Impact: not applicable, yet

Recommendation: City staff recommends that City Council accept the proposed

schedule of hearings as outlined below. Even before those public hearings may begin, the governing body must decide whether to “accept” or “reject” a petition for annexation. Accepting such petition does not commit the governing body to approving any or all of the requested annexation. Accepting such petition simply initiates a series of proceedings which may eventually lead to annexation. These hearings allow the opportunity for input from the public, interested parties, and the petitioner - for consideration by the City Council.

annexation calendar (no special meetings needed) first public hearing January 21, 2014 second public hearing February 4, 2014 introduce annexation February 18, 2014 ordinance, on first reading second and final reading March 4, 2014 of annexation ordinance

Attachments: legal description as provided by the applicant, of the proposed

area labeled “Exhibit A” survey map as provided by the applicant petition as submitted to City staff

Presentation: AJ Fawver, Interim Director of Development Services

Publication: No legal notice required at this time. However, if City Council

agrees to accept this petition, legal notice of required public

hearings will need to be published (in the newspaper) and posted on the City’s web site.

City of San Angelo Office of the City Clerk



From: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk


Contact: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk, 657-4405

Caption: Regular Agenda

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, CASTING VOTES FOR ONE NOMINEE OR DISTRIBUTING THEM AMONG NOMINEES FOR A POSITION ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT FOR THE JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2015 TERM OF OFFICE

Summary: The nomination and appointment process is set out in Section 6.03 of the State Property Tax Code. Appraisal district board members serve 2 year terms. The current terms of the five board members expire on December 31, 2013. Nominations have been received from the participating governing bodies. The Council may distribute its 1,311 votes in any manner it desires among the 5 nominees. Each Councilmember is allocated 187.2 votes (1/7 of the total 1,311 votes allocated to the City of San Angelo). The Council may also choose to cast all its votes for one candidate or may distribute votes equally among any number of the candidates. There is no provision for write-in candidates. The Council must take action by December 15, 2013 by Resolution on the official ballot. The nominees are:

John Begnaud John Conn Russell DeVore Louis P. Gomez Bob Reeves

The five newly elected board members will begin serving their two year term of office on January 1, 2014. Financial Impact: None Other Information/Recommendation: Letter dated October 23rd and received on November 2013 from the Chief Appraiser provides additional information. A historical summary of the City Council nomination process is also included with this cover memo.

Attachment: Resolution and Notice

Minutes Page 103 October 5, 1993 Vol. 80 NOMINATION OF CANDIDATES FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT The City Manager reviewed the background information. Councilwoman Tucker stated that the current directors have performed well. Motion, to nominate Mr. Dick Burnett, Mr. A. H. "Chico" Denis, Mr. John Fuentes, Mr. Walter Pfluger, and Mr. John Phillips as candidates for the Board of Directors of Tom Green County Appraisal District for 1993-95, was made by Councilman Izzard and seconded by Councilman Hiebert. Motion carried unanimously. Page 158 Minutes Vol. 84 October 3, 1995 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NOMINATING CANDIDATES FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT The Council discussed the function of the board. The City Manager explained the process for selection of the board. Motion, to adopt the resolution nominating Mr. Dick Burnett, Mr. A. H. "Chico" Denis, Mr. John Fuentes, Mr. Walter Pfluger, and Mr. John Phillips for the Board of Directors of the Tom Green County Appraisal District, was made by Councilmember Izzard and seconded by Councilmember Burrows. Motion carried unanimously. Annex F, Page 168, "Resolution" Page 84 Minutes Vol. 87 November 4, 1997 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION SETTING NUMBER OF VOTES TO BE CAST FOR NOMINEES FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT FOR 1998-2000 TERM

City Clerk Carol Rigby presented the results of each Councilmembers vote. Each Councilmember cast 232.5 votes (1/6 of the 1,395 total votes allocated to the City of San Angelo) among the 6 nominees. Councilmember Shrum cast his votes as follows: Mr. Pfluger - 132.5; Mr. Phillips - 100. Councilmember Burrows cast his votes as follows: Mr. Phillips - 232.5. Councilmember Holguin cast his votes as follows: Mr. Bastardo - 232.5. Councilmember Tucker cast her votes as follows: Mr. Burnett - 232.5. Councilmember Ryon cast her votes as follows: Mr. Bastardo - 46; Mr. Burnett - 46; Mr. Denis - 46; Mr. Pfluger - 46; Mr. Phillips - 48.5. Councilmember Mahon cast his votes as follows: Mr. Fuentes - 77.5; Mr. Pfluger - 77.5; Mr. Phillips - 77.5. Motion, to adopt a resolution setting the number of votes to be cast for nominees for the Board of Directors of the Tom Green County Appraisal District for the 1998-2000 term as follows: Mr. Richard Bastardo - 278.5; Mr. Dick Burnett - 278.5; Mr. A.H. AChico@, III - 46; Mr. John Fuentes - 77.5; Mr. Walter Pfluger - 256; Mr. John Phillips - 458.5, was made by Councilmember Holguin and seconded by Councilmember Burrows. Motion carried unanimously.

Annex F, Page 83, AResolution@ Page 610 Minutes Vol. 89 October 5, 1999 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NOMINATING CANDIDATES FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT City Clerk Kathy Keane presented background information, noting that the Appraisal Board has five members up for reappointment, and Council will need to nominate for these five positions. Ms. Keane further noted that everyone currently serving on the board is eligible for reappointment and willing to serve except Mr. John Fuentes. City Manager Tom Adams noted that this is a two step process. A discussion followed regarding the qualifications needed. Responding to a question from Councilmember Holguin, Ms. Keane noted that Mr. Dean had indicated that Mr. Walter Pfluger and Mr. Louis Gomez had expressed interest in holding these positions. Noting that Mr. Pfluger would be an asset, Councilmember Ryon explained that she had spoken with Mr. Pfluger and she would like to consider him for one of the positions. Councilmembers Shrum and Holguin agreed. Responding to a question from Councilmember Bastardo, Ms. Keane stated that she had not made contact with the Chief Appraiser, but had spoken with Mr. Rusty Dean, the attorney for the Appraisal District, who prepared the Resolution. Noting a possible problem with a Councilmember serving on the Tax Appraisal Board, Councilmember Shrum stated that Louis Gomez was interested as well. Councilmember Shrum further suggested that Mr. Gomez and Mr. Pfluger be substituted for present members John Fuentes and Richard Bastardo. Councilmember Mahon explained that there is a perceived problem with Mr. Bastardo being able to set the tax rate as a member on this board. While this is legally permissible, it is the perception which could be harmful. Councilmember Ryon agreed that this is a problem and questioned if Council should make a rule that Councilmembers can not serve on other boards. Councilmember Shrum noted that some boards have requested City Council representation, however, perception of is the matter of concern. Mr. Adams noted that involvement in certain areas needs to be watched. Councilmember Bastardo noted that it was this Council who voted him in as a member of the Tax Appraisal Board. Mr. Bastardo stated that all the present board members are good people, but explained that he has not been on the board for long and has the time to serve. Serving on the Tax Appraisal Board does not hamper his agenda to stay open-minded and attend all the meetings. Mayor Fender explained that when Council voted to have Mr. Bastardo serve, he was not on the Council

at the time. Mayor Fender further explained that this is not a personal decision. Councilmember Holguin nominated Councilmember Bastardo. Council discussed how the vote would take place. Each Councilmember will get five votes. An initial vote was taken. The nominees received the following number of votes: Richard Bastardo: 4 votes; Councilmembers Burrows, Holguin, Bastardo and Ryon Dick Burnett: 4 votes; Councilmembers Shrum, Burrows, Holguin and Mahon Chico Dennis: 4 votes; Councilmembers Shrum, Burrows, Ryon and Mahon John Phillips: 4 votes; Councilmembers Shrum, Burrows, Mahon and Mayor Fender Walter Pfluger: 5 votes; Councilmembers Shrum, Burrows, Ryon, Mahon and Mayor Fender Louis Gomez: 4 votes; Councilmembers Shrum, Burrows, Mahon and Mayor Fender Mr. Walter Pfluger was nominated and the Council voted again on the remaining nominees with each Councilmember receiving four votes. The nominees received the following number of votes: Richard Bastardo: 4 votes; Councilmembers Burrows, Holguin, Bastardo and Ryon Dick Burnett: 5 votes; Councilmembers Shrum, Burrows, Holguin, Mahon and Mayor Fender Chico Dennis: 4 votes; Councilmembers Shrum, Ryon, Mahon and Mayor Fender John Phillips: 7 votes; Full Council Louis Gomez: 7 votes; Full Council At this point the following additional persons were nominated: Dick Burnett, John Phillips, and Louis Gomez. Because the number of votes received for Mr. Bastardo and Mr. Dennis were tied, another vote was taken. Richard Bastardo: 3 votes; Councilmembers Burrows, Holguin, and Bastardo Chico Dennis: 4 votes; Councilmembers Shrum, Ryon, Mahon, and Mayor Fender Motion, to adopt a resolution nominating Walter Pfluger, Dick Burnett, John Phillips, Louis Gomez, and Chico Dennis for Board of Directors of the Tom Green County Appraisal District, was made by Councilmember Shrum and seconded by Councilmember Mahon. Aye: Shrum, Mahon, Fender, Burrows, Bastardo, and Ryon. Nay: Holguin. Motion carried 6-1. Annex B, Page 619, AResolution@ Page 400 Minutes Vol. 92 October 2, 2001 ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION NOMINATING CANDIDATES FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT Responding to questions of Councilmembers Holguin and Wardlaw, City Manager Tom Adams informed that Directors did not have term limits but that the Council was free to nominate their own slate of nominees. He further agreed that future nominations could include information regarding the length of service for each nominee. Motion, to adopt a Resolution nominating candidates for the Board of Directors of the Tom Green County Appraisal District, as presented, was made by Councilmember Mahon and seconded by Councilmember

Darby. Motion carried unanimously. Annex C, Page 425, AResolution@ Minutes Page 439 October 7, 2003 Vol. 95 ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION NOMINATING CANDIDATES FOR THE TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS City Manager Tom Adams presented background information. Responding to the request of Councilmember Holguin to delay the nomination process, Councilmember Bates noted the Resolution nominating candidates was required to be submitted prior to October 15, 2003. By consensus, the Council requested a letter be drafted for the Mayor’s signature to the Tom Green County Appraisal District requesting the City receive this notice of nomination earlier, perhaps mid August, to ensure sufficient time to more fully consider the nominations to be forwarded to the Chief Appraiser. Councilmember Holguin advised he had other individuals he would have preferred to bring forward. Motion, to adopt a Resolution nominating the following individuals for the Tom Green County Appraisal District Board of Directors: Dick Burnett, A.H. “Chico” Denis III, Louis Gomez, Walter Pfluger and John Phillips, as presented, was made by Councilmember Mahon and seconded by Councilmember Rainey. Aye: Mahon, Rainey, Lown, Morrison, Reeves and Bates. Nay: Holguin. Motion carried 6-1. Annex C, Page 453, “Resolution” Page 271 Minutes Vol. 98 December 13, 2005

APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION SETTING OUT NUMBER OF VOTES TO BE CAST FOR NOMINEES FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT FOR 2006-2007

NOTE: Nominations were not made in 2005

City Manager Harold Dominguez presented background information.

Councilmember Holguin commented on the nominations and repeated requests to facilitate the process. General discussion was held on the time provided to submit votes and required turnaround of the nomination process. Mayor Lown requested staff work with Tom Green County Appraisal District on future nominations.

Motion, to divide votes equally among nominees, was made by Mayor Lown and seconded by Councilmember Rainey. AYE: Lown, Bates, Farmer, Morrison, and Rainey NAY: Holguin. Motion carried 5-1.

Annex J, Page 295, “Resolution”

Page 5 Minutes Vol. 99 September 18, 2007

APPROVAL OF CANDIDATE NOMINATIONS TO SERVE ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TOM GREEN COUNTY (TGC) APPRAISAL DISTRICT FOR THE 2008-2009 TERM

Mayor Lown suggested the Council consider reviewing the criteria and nominating individuals to serve on the TGC Appraisal District board. He commented the existing board consisted of the same members serving numerous terms. Finance Director Michael Dane stated the nomination process was time sensitive and noted the nomination should be finalized no later than October 15, 2007. Mayor Lown recommended Mr. Louis Hall.

Councilmember Perez-Jimenez requested the item be considered at the Visions meeting on September 27 and 28, 2007. Council concurred. Mayor Lown informed the TGC board meets approximately 7 times a year for 1 to 3 hours.

Mayor Lown recommended the nominees complete an application and forward such to City Clerk Alicia Ramirez.

Page 5 Minutes Vol. 100 October 2, 2007 ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION NOMINATING LOUIS HALL AS A CANDIDATE FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT

Motion, to adopt a Resolution nominating Louis Hall as a candidate for Board of Directors of Tom Green County Appraisal District, was made by Mayor Lown and seconded by Councilmember Perez-Jimenez. Motion carried unanimously.

Annex F, Page 25, “Resolution”

Minutes Page 5 November 6, 2007 Vol. 100

ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION SETTING OUT THE NUMBER OF VOTES TO BE CAST FOR NOMINEES FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT

Councilmembers submitted their votes as follows: Councilmember Farmer, 199 for Louis Hall; Councilmember Hogg, 49.75 each for Dick Burnett, Louis Hall, Chico Denis, and Walter Pfluger; Councilmember Perez-Jimenez, 199 for Louis Hall; Mayor Lown, 199 for Louis Hall; Councilmember Cárdenas, 199 for Louis Hall; Councilmember Morrison, 199 for John Phillips; and Councilmember Fields, 199 for Louis Hall.

Motion, to adopt a Resolution setting out 49.75 votes for Dick Burnett, 49.75 votes for A.H. “Chico” Denis, 0 votes for Louis P. Gomez, 1044.75 votes for Louis Hall, 49.75 votes for Walter W. Pfluger, and 199 votes for John D. Phillips to be cast for nominees for Board of Directors of Tom Green County Appraisal District, was made by Mayor Lown and seconded by Councilmember Farmer. Motion carried unanimously.

Annex G, Page 89, “Resolution” Minutes Page 505 October 6, 2009 Vol. 101 ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION NOMINATING CANDIDATES EMILIO PEREZ-JIMENEZ, TIM EDWARDS, VICKIE BOULDEN, BOB REEVES, AND JOHN BEGNAUD AS CANDIDATES FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT FOR THE 2010-2012 TERM

City Clerk Alicia Ramirez presented background information. General discussion and nominations were made by the Councilmembers.

Motion, to close nominations, was made by Councilmember Farmer and seconded by Councilmember Silvas. Motion carried unanimously.

In conclusion, the following nominations were made.

Motion, to adopt a resolution nominating candidates Emilio Perez-Jimenez, Tim Edwards, Vickie Boulden, Bob Reeves, and John Begnaud as candidates for the Board of Directors of the Tom Green County Appraisal District for the 2010-2012 Term, was made by Mayor Pro Tempore Hogg and seconded by Councilmember Adams. Motion carried unanimously.

Annex A, Page, “Resolution” Page 6 Minutes Vol. 103 December 6, 2011 ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION CASTING VOTES FOR ONE NOMINEE OR DISTRIBUTING THEM AMONG NOMINEES FOR A POSITION ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT FOR THE JANUARY 1, 2012 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2013 TERM OF OFFICE (ANNEX G, PAGE 153, RESOLUTION #2011-12-130R)

City Clerk Alicia Ramirez presented background information.

Councilmember Morrison requested his votes be cast equally to Begnaud, Conn, and Reeves.

Councilmember Silvas requested his total votes be cast to Diaz.

The remaining City Council members requested their votes be cast equally to Begnaud, Conn, Gomez, Hall, and Reeves.

Motion, to adopt the Resolution, as stated and votes casted, was made by Mayor New and seconded by Councilmember Farmer. Motion carried unanimously.

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, CASTING VOTES FOR ONE NOMINEE OR DISTRIBUTING THEM AMONG NOMINEES FOR A POSITION ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TOM GREEN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT FOR THE JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2015 TERM OF OFFICE

WHEREAS, Section 6.03, Property Tax Code, State of Texas, allows a municipality that is a taxing unit in an appraisal district a voting entitlement to vote for directors as determined by the chief appraiser for each of the five positions to be filled on the board of directors of the Tom Green County Appraisal District; and WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo is a taxing unit of the Tom Green County Appraisal District; and WHEREAS, the City Council as governing body of the City of San Angelo desires to exercise its right of casting votes for one nominee or distribute them among nominees as provided by law for each of the five positions to be filled on the board of directors of the Tom Green County Appraisal District for the two year term of office commencing January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2015; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas: Section 1. That the facts and recitations set forth in the preamble of this resolution be, and they are hereby, adopted, ratified, and confirmed. Section 2. That the City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas, hereby allocates its total entitlement of 1,311 votes for the Tom Green County Appraisal District Board of Directors for two year terms beginning January 1, 2014 and expiring December 31, 2015, as follows:

Nominee Name: Number of Votes Cast

1. John Begnaud _________

2. John Conn _________

3. Louis P. Gomez _________

4. Louis Hall _________

5. Bob Reeves _________

Section 3. That the Mayor for the City of San Angelo, as presiding officer, be, and that he is hereby, authorized and directed to deliver or cause to be delivered a certified copy of this resolution to the chief appraiser of the Tom Green County Appraisal District on or before December 15, 2013. Section 4. That this resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, in accordance with the provisions of the State Statutes of the State of Texas.

Section 5. Open Meetings Act. It is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this resolution was passed was open to the public and public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given, all as required by the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. Motion made by __________________, seconded by __________________. Motion carried unanimously. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 17 h DAY OF DECEMBER, 2013.

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS ______________________________ Dwain Morrison, Mayor

ATTEST: _______________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney Received in the office of the Chief Appraiser, Tom Green County Appraisal District, on the _____ day of December, 2013. ________________________ Bill H. Benson, Chief Appraiser

December 17, 2013 Agenda Packet

Documents

Transcript of December 17, 2013 Agenda Packet