December 10, 1905

download December 10, 1905

of 4

Transcript of December 10, 1905

  • 7/23/2019 December 10, 1905

    1/4

    The Week.

    The award of th e Nobel prize of $40,

    000 to Theodore Roosevelt is a prope

    recognition of his success in bringin{

    about peace between Russi a and Japan

    This s he finest

    of

    President

    Roose

    velts achievements, andhe one f o

    which he should be longest remembered

    In

    every and thisaward will be ap

    plauded, nowhere, however, more warm

    ly than in this country, which is a shar

    er in the honor to its Chief Magistrate

    With admirable public spirit and tact

    hl

    has decided t o devote the money to

    cause of industria l peace. The prizc

    will also, we trust, modify his own con

    ventional deasabout the necessity

    being armed o t h e teeth, and will sei

    his

    thoughts more strongly hanhere

    tofore

    in

    the direction of amity be

    tween nations. A t the coming Haguc

    Conference he has a unique opportunity

    to start le he world by humanitar ian

    proposals for isarmament; e

    is p e

    culiarly in a position t o lead in somc

    long step oward relie ving- the poor of

    Europe from hecrushing burdens of

    militarism.

    President Roosevelt oftenspeaks and

    acts as if in his conception an efficient

    government is that

    of

    a benevolent auto-

    crat-not amere executive, checked by

    a legislature and

    a

    judiciary, and hem

    med in by rigid laws When routine ad-

    ministration under law allows perpetra-

    tlon of a wrong, he would step in,

    deus

    erc machana and make the cause of vir.

    tue rmmph his

    notlon

    of hishas

    never been displayed more clearly than

    in hi s special message to Congress ask-

    ingauthority o dismiss navalpfficers

    whenever he sees

    fit.

    The cas6 which

    has lncltedhim to his xtraordinary

    step is that of a paymaster who, becom-

    ing drunkat a dinner in a Yokohama

    hotel,

    on

    May 9, 1905, behaved indecent-

    ly

    inhe presence

    of

    aumber of

    Indles. When th is officer was tried in

    Janu ary, 1906, the .court-martial plaibly

    came short of duty, for, nstead

    of

    dis-

    missing him, it merely reduced him to

    the foot of the ist of paymasters and

    prescribed a public reprimand. In hu-

    man nstitutlons such failures re in-

    evitable. I thinkhereis~ no dan-

    ger that his power would be abused,

    says

    Mr.

    Roosevelt, inmaking his

    request for absolute authority.is

    consciousness of his own rectitude is

    thus only surpassed by his comidence in

    his unlinown successors. Moreover, he

    wrote this message at he very mo-

    ment when thousands

    of

    Americans were

    warmly protesting because he had ended

    the milit ary careers of 150.innocent

    601

    die% because he could not get hold of

    from nine

    to

    twenty guilty men. This

    was so grave a n err or tha t it may fit1

    be characterized as an abuse of powel

    The President, too, has plainly neg

    lected the naval officers point of v ie s

    The aw t o whichhe objects was de

    manded by thearmyand navg. jointl:

    as

    security that officers should bede

    prived of life commissions only dul

    process of aw. And why not the Arm:

    if the Navy? the Revenue Marine

    If executive dismissal will exti rpat e a1

    evil growths, why limit it to the Navy

    The Secretary of the Navy recant;

    this year his ast years belief that wc

    havewarships enough, and he hin k

    it well to have womorebattleships

    Hishange of mind

    is

    due

    t o

    thc

    failure of certain expectations tha

    foreign nations would limit thei;

    fleets, and o nother mysterious rea

    son,

    no

    reference

    t o

    which shall slil

    from his pen. The rest of

    his

    armua.

    report

    is

    of interest because it endorse:

    highly the recommendation of the Per,

    sonnel Board, which has been s itting al:

    summer with a view to regulating thf

    flow of promotion; and because it favor:

    also a radical reorganization of th e Na n

    Department.

    A

    more sweeping changf

    in the corps

    of

    officers has never been

    proposed at any one time, unless it be

    theamalgamation of the ineand thc

    engineers. In urging a reorganization

    o the Navy Department, Bonapartc

    fayors placing all hebureauswhkh

    have t o

    do

    with under one head

    and those relating to the personnel

    un-

    der another. The first will com-

    prise thebureau of sard sand docks,

    squipment, construction and repair,

    heam engineering, and ordnance.

    In

    ;he other will be the office .of the Chief

    if

    the Navigation Bureau, the Surgeon-

    2enera1, Paymaster-General, Command-

    mt of the Marine Corps, and the Super-

    .d en de nt of the Naval Academy. From

    ;he point of view of business method

    tnd fighting efficiency, much is to be

    ;aid in.favor of the suggestedchange

    3ut the heads of these two sections will

    lavenormous power-much greater

    ,han that of the present Chief of the

    3ureau of Navigation, who, in th e eyes

    ,f many officers, has had far too much

    :ontrol

    over the destinies of individ-

    ials.

    The annual eports of the Secretary

    the Treasury have long been largely

    ;iven up to dl-cussion of th e currency

    .nd

    exposition of projects of reform.

    Jothing, in fact, could better prove the

    lodge-podge character of past finan-

    Y

    Y

    e

    Y

    ?

    1

    ?

    S

    3

    t

    r

    5 .

    r

    L

    1

    I

    1

    f

    t

    J

    1

    t

    I

    t

    c

    t

    cia1 legislation, as a whole, than the fact

    that, for nearly half a century, the

    an-

    Treasury reports have almost with-

    out exception advocated a change in ex-

    isting law. Secretary Shaw, in his first

    report,

    -1902,

    argued f o r a banknote cur-

    rency based on general assets, remarking

    tha t he did not believe it necessary to

    make the currency thus issued a first lien

    on

    assets, and that the new plan would

    not preclude the continuance

    of

    the

    present na tional bank currency. A year

    ago, he psoposed additional issues of

    banknotes, to

    50

    per cent. of out-

    standing bond-secured circulation, but

    subject to a tax

    of

    5 or 6 per cent., with

    a view t o early redemption when n o

    longer needed. Since Secretary Shaws

    report of

    1905,

    committees of the New

    York Chamber of Commerce an dhe

    American Bankers Association, have, as

    we noted

    on

    November

    22,

    joined in

    formulating

    a

    plan which includes the

    main principles of these Treasury prop-

    ositions. But now. the Secretary seems

    t o have abandoned his currency re

    form plan of a year ago, a nd the modifi-

    cation of it proposed by the bankers, in

    behalf of a plan of sh eer paternalism in

    the money market. He revives the ideas

    which he has enunciated irom ime t o

    time regarding bank reserves, and their

    regulation inhe discretion of the

    Treasury. In t h s vlew he is, we think,

    governed by wholly erroneousnotions

    of th e money market, which ead him

    t o a mischievous inference as t o the

    properunctions

    of

    theTreasury

    His

    fundamental argument seems

    . to

    be that

    Wall

    Street call money rates of 25

    or

    50 per cent. are evils

    per

    se and

    necessary evils at ha t; therefore, the

    banks ought to combine t o suppress

    them, and if thebanks willnot do

    so,

    the Treasury ought

    t o

    intervene. For

    ourselves, thisstrikes us assitting on

    a

    safety valve.

    Mr.

    Shavsdeas

    on

    oaternalism in . .finance are summariz-

    ?d in this extrapdinary paragraph from

    his report, whjchwe reprint without

    further comment-

    If

    theSecretary

    of

    theTreasurywcre

    :men

    100,000,000 t o

    lje deposlted with the

    ,

    or withdrawn as be mlght deem ex-

    ledlent.

    if

    m

    addltion

    he mere clothed

    n t h authority over the reserves

    of

    the sevr

    ?rsl banks. wlth power t o contract the na-

    :ional-bankcirculation at pleasure, 111 my

    ludgrnent

    no

    panic dlstingulshed

    ndustrial stagnatloncould hreaten either

    .he

    United

    or Europe

    that

    he could

    lot avert

    The United States Civil Service Com-

    nission, in tsann ual report, confirms

    he press dispatches rega rdin g he diffi-

    :ulties of the Government in Elling its

    rompetitive positions People stil l ake

    heexaminations, it appears, but rom

  • 7/23/2019 December 10, 1905

    2/4

    9s

    40

    to

    60

    per cent. of the highest eligi-

    bles

    on

    the various lists decline appoint-

    ments. The Government cannot hope

    to compete withrivate employers,

    say s he Commission, unless it pays

    salaries hat measure

    up

    fairly well t o

    the tandard 6f private business. In

    order

    t o

    make Government posltions

    more attractive, a bill has been introduc-

    ed increasing thesal ari es of civil em-

    .

    ployeesy 1 0 per cent. heomplaint

    of

    thls class does not, however, come

    alone. Congress i s coming t o the point

    of raising the salaries of its own mem-

    bers.

    A

    Cabinet officer has embodied

    in isnnualeport

    an

    allusion

    t o

    the inadequacy of hispay Generally

    speaking, ther e s not a man n public

    position, hlgh

    o r

    low,who oes

    I

    no t

    make a convincing demonstration that,

    on

    a

    basis of the.private demand for

    like services, he ought to receive more

    thanhe does. Logically, we should ex-

    pect the announcement t ha t th e Govern-

    ment machinery is inadequatelymanned.

    yet he speciqcations in regard t o the

    present abor famine are not alarmlng

    T o say hat Government salaries have

    not been adjusted t o meet the present

    cost of living, is merely stating one

    of

    their shortcomings. They have not

    prop-

    erly been adjusted a t all. Most of them

    Just growed.And theman really

    t o

    be pitied is not the ambitious outsider,

    whether he be a candidate for a Cabinet

    post o r a rural free delivery route, but

    the sheltered clerk who entered the ser-

    vice in he days when the salary look-

    ed larger,and to-day can neither have

    It enlarged

    nor

    summon the nitiative

    1

    go

    elsewhere.

    Th,e Isthmian Canal Commission an-

    nounced on Saturday postponement

    till anuary 1 2 of th e openlng of bids

    f o r the completion of thePanama Ca-

    This is the officially optimistic way

    of confessing

    that

    no blds had been re-

    ceived, andha t none would bo re-

    celved by thedat e originally fixed,De-

    cember

    12.

    Moreover, it is sbated that

    certa in changes in he form ocon-

    tract are to be made. These ape due,

    I t

    IS explained, to the suggestlons

    of

    a

    number

    of

    contractors. This

    again is

    thepolite way of saylng hat th,e old

    form of contract was impracticable.

    Among the sweeping alterations now to

    be made in thls contract, which last

    hummer wasWwless and would be

    changed to uit no one, 1) Re-

    ductlon in theamount of the bond re-

    quired;

    (2)

    rellef of the contractor from

    liability

    f o r

    defective material, throw-

    ing upon the Government the expense

    of peplacing an y th at may be discover-

    ed; (3) aGovernmentuazantee to

    cover fluctuations in the wage smle on

    tbe Isthmus,and 4 ) a atlpulation

    by

    the Government that

    no

    contractor shall

    be held in loss on account of faulty en-

    gne erin g data. Thls ast point is ,crit-

    T h e N a t i o n

    ical

    and

    ominous. Prospkctlve bidders,

    i t is admltted,,havebeen so disturbed

    byhle engineering uncerta inty-of he

    plans adopted by the Government, that

    they would not ndertakehe work

    without. a g&ran tee that the Treasury

    should stand he loss, if any resulted

    from that cause. It is understood that

    these technical doubts relate mainly to

    the borings for he great Gatun dam,

    and to he constructton of three locks

    In

    flight at hat point. How serious s

    the latt er difficulty,may be seen by run-

    ning over the testimony of various en-

    gineers before the Senabe Committee

    last spring.

    A standpat Congress refused 1 s t

    year to allow the reeentry of Canad-

    ian lumber for the rebuilding

    of

    San

    Francisco. Therefore, Oregon andwash-

    ingtonhave been drawn

    upon f o r

    the

    exceptional demand Rut he American

    ton nag ewh ich alone can carry freight

    from one American port t o another-As

    so

    inadequate that ate s have already

    risen fram $5

    o r

    less to 9 per thousand

    feet, with a prospect of 10 Meanwhile,

    there lies idle a n abundance of first-

    classoreignhipping.Theseoreign

    ships cannot carry lumber

    t o

    San Fran-

    cisco under heir present egister, nor

    can .American capital buy them and ap-

    gly them in this vitally necessary work

    The only practicable plan is explained

    by thePortland Oregonian in he case

    of theBritish steamship Duneric. This

    vessel has been chartered by Portland

    capital, and will be sent o British

    Co-

    lumbia, there o load with lumber fo r

    San Francisco, at freight ates of $6

    per tliousand feet, whlch, plus the duty

    of

    $2,

    will still be iess than he charge

    forcarryingnative lumber rom Port-

    land o San Francisco under the Amer-

    ican flag. If it werea case

    of

    foreign-

    owned freight-car

    or

    wngon or wheelbar-

    ro.w, Americans would simply buy and

    use it But as it is a ship, tmust be

    sent first round Robin Hoods barn, and,

    after all,eliverumberotut in

    American mills.

    The promotion of John

    W.

    Riddle,

    now Minister to Rumania and Servia,

    t o be Ambassador to Russia,

    is

    thor-

    oughly deserved

    He

    never gave large

    sums to the Republican campalgh chest,

    o r

    owned a newjspaper, or wielded great

    political and social influence; hence he

    will be, among

    our

    Ambassadors, almost

    in a class by himself. Because he rep-

    resents the simple life, is one reason

    now given foris appointment. A

    farbetter one is that he has worked

    his way

    up

    from a secretaryship by

    sheermerit. A remarkable linguist, de-

    voted

    t o

    the diplomatic s_ervice n which

    he has

    now

    been

    a

    round dozenYears,

    he has shown conclusively t ha the

    United States can get men of- the righ t

    type

    t o fill

    the e ntire diplomatic service

    \

    [Vel. 83,

    No.

    2163

    as

    soon

    as ,it ofPers

    a

    permanent

    career a nd pays suitable salaries.

    The Popes seeming reJectlon of

    compromise with theFrench Govern-

    ment on the question of Separatioq has

    undoubtedly precipitated

    as

    grave a

    crisis as any Ministry has been compell-

    ed to face slnce th e establishment of the

    Third Republic. Should the deadlock

    turnout to be as obstinate as would

    appear from the declarations of both

    the Vaticanand he Cabinet, the coun-

    try would be confronted by c iv ~ l issen-

    sion at a time when external-relations

    are enough of themselves to cause the

    Government much anxiety. Yet it is th e

    very necessity of maintain ing the coun-

    trys position in he presentdelicately

    adjusted balance

    of

    European politics

    that

    may

    impel the French Government

    to find means for avoiding actual

    war

    with the Church, while maintaining the

    Separation Law in

    its

    substance.

    Nor

    is he Churchbent on actual violence.

    So

    far

    as

    may be gathered from con-

    flicting dispatches, the resistance of the

    French Catholics is t o be passive in na-

    ture

    It

    is said thatparish priests,

    vicars, etc,must emain passive, and

    may not codperate in any act of seques-

    tratlon; but i f the bishop considers that

    the refusal of the reasurers t o surren-

    der the keys may cause-grave conse-

    quences, he can permit hem

    t o

    do so.

    And, again: Bishops mayuthorize

    Catholic officials t o participate n se-

    questers, if the refus al would endanger

    positions necessary

    for

    the maintenance

    of thei r families. Neither side, webe-

    lieve, should be desirous t o provoke a

    collision-the Government, because

    crisesoften mean ministeria l changes,

    and th e Vatican, because religious

    war, in the present temper

    of

    the coun-

    try,

    would

    not edound to he perma-

    nent interests of the Catholic Church.

    It is significant that th e Popes decision

    shouId have been withheld till the, new

    French law was on the point of going

    into effect Such highignitariess

    Archbishop Lecot of Bordeaux an d Car-

    8ina.l Richard were allowed t o put

    wardeasures of compromise which

    they are now compelled

    to

    repudiate.

    The Gokernment may find

    this

    summary

    overriding of he peaceful effort s Of

    French ecclesiastics by the Curia pow-

    erful weapon in he campaign against

    foreign dominance in Frenc h affairs.

    One Rllnistrp after anothef falling on

    the anti-clerical issue, th e King alarmed,

    and the^ people on the verge

    of

    riotous

    outbrea1tssuch is the news from Cath-

    olic Spain. Yet signs of a political .

    movement against he privileges of th e

    Church have long been vlsible. It is not

    only the Republican or anarchistic ele-

    ment, a s in Catalonia, @at has now to

    be reckoned with ; here-i s evidently a

    deep and widespread feeling t ha t he

  • 7/23/2019 December 10, 1905

    3/4

    Dec. 13, 19061 T h e

    N a t i o n 499

    civil power mustassert itself against

    the ecclesiasticar. The intellectual alien-

    ation from the Church has long been

    evident in Spain, aqd, of late, th e an-

    tagonism h1a.s seemed to be striking

    down. One recalls the popular exc ite

    ment which GaldBss mildly anti-cleri-

    c,al

    play, Electra, provoked. The large

    sale and vogue

    of

    a tirade against the

    Church which itsauthor, Ibafiez, call.

    ed a novel and published under the

    title La Catedral, had a similar omi-

    nous significance. That he political re-

    sul t will be some form of legislation di-

    rected at the prerogatives of the Church,

    along the lines of the French law,

    though probably not so extreme, now

    appears to be certain.

    Sharp differences of opinion at the

    congress

    of

    Itqlian Socialists lately held

    Rome were taken by many as a sign

    of weakness and break-up. Buta writ-

    er n he ouvelle Revue asserts hat

    the result was really a trlumph for the

    moderatesThere s

    a

    party of reform

    which constitutes. the Right. It preaches

    the emancipation of theproletariat by

    means of education and instruction. It

    does not advocate any particular politi-

    caI r6g1me, but opposes clerical influ-

    ence, urges the reduction of the mlli-

    tary establishment, and favorsuniver-

    sal suffrage. The Syndicalists com-

    pose the Left. They seek to propagate

    revolutionary collectmism; they advo-

    cate th e general strike, and demand the

    substitution of an armed nation or

    the present standing army.The Cen-

    tre

    is

    represented by the Integral-

    ists.who seek t o compose the diEer-

    ew es between the extremes At the

    congress, however, the Syndlcalists were

    defeated by a coalition of the two other

    parties. The programme upon whlch

    these gree puts social refqrm above

    political agita tion, and thi s distlnguishes

    them from the earlier Republicans, who

    believed that a change in the form of

    government was of the

    first

    importance.

    Dunng the last twenty years there has

    been a rapid development

    of

    Socialism

    in Italy, due, according to the writer in

    the Nouvel le Revue to the wretched

    condition^ of th e working people, espe-

    cially in he south and

    in

    the agricul-

    turaldistrictsBut t happens to be In

    the north that Sociallsm has been most.

    successful.

    As

    was pointed out fifteen

    years ago by Leroy-Beaulieu, the so-

    cialistic unrestntaly really arlses

    from the fact that there has been great

    improvement in the condition of the

    working classes, and the reforms al-

    ready accomplished make them eager

    to achieve larger results.

    aspect

    of

    socialistic experiments,

    often overlooked. is brought forward by

    F

    T. Bulien

    in

    the London

    Spectator

    The common notion is that public relief

    works, old-age pensions, support for

    I

    .

    1

    I

    1

    1

    E

    I

    1

    I

    C

    I

    t

    f

    C

    I

    t

    C

    t

    f.

    1

    I t

    peoplewho are out

    of

    employment, anc

    similar socialisticenterprises, take ma

    ney from the rich and give it

    t o

    thr

    poor-a blessed levelling of inequalities

    Not so, says Mr. Bullen. The ich arl

    not the chief sufferers rom hese

    tempts at equalizing, but theargf

    and almost unconsidered class of

    ers, ju st kept on the weather lde o

    want by incessant work. These

    an

    the people who feel the pinch of increas

    ec

    taxes, an increase that isdistribut.

    through he community in a rise

    :

    rents, as well as in the price of all thc

    necessaries of life. I haveheard Lad]

    Warwick assert at a banquet, adds

    Mr

    Eullen, that it was theduty of thr

    state t o feed and clothe as well as edu

    czte every chlld of th e poor,. and

    I

    long

    ed to askher whatshe understood bJ

    the tate.Sheevidently had in minc

    the people of wealth; but

    Mr.

    Buller

    argues that in London the state meanr

    the humble workers who are willing

    andndustrlous, and who dread the

    pauperization of themselves

    o r

    theil

    children more than death,yet whoarc

    gradually crushed down into hat bot.

    tcrmless pit by the ever-growing burden

    of rates expended by utterly irresponsi,

    ble men of th e type of Mr. Will Crook

    sud

    Mr

    George Lansbury, and women

    like Lady Warwick. In this country

    we have no t gone so far; but many per-

    Eons of fine humanitarian impulses, wha

    3ympathixe deeply with themiseries of

    :he poor urge us to follow the example

    ~

    New Zealand, Australia, Germany,

    tndEngland. But before .casting heir

    cotes for such policies, they should e x

    imine the problem more deeply and dls-

    :over theltimate incidence of the

    .axes f o r their well-meant projects

    German colonial affalrs have inevita-

    ) y taken much of theime of th e

    ieichstags present session, and the re.

    :ent

    six.

    days debate put the Govern-

    nent to.its trumps. Fortunate ly f o r its

    )restige, it had already begun to clean

    louse; and th e new Director of th e Co-

    onial Bureau, Bernllard Dernburg, was

    lble to present his plans and achieve-

    nents so vigorously as t o demblish many

    )f

    the criticisms directed agalnst him

    ma his office.

    Von

    Bulow stood by his

    lew subordinate w ith all possible loyal-

    y, and the

    result

    is distinctly

    a

    triumph

    or the Government. The gravest ac-

    ,usations of cruelty and mismanage-

    nent were made by Bebel and by Herr

    toerens, one of the leaders of the Cen-

    re The lat ter produced, as prooff

    tarbarity,

    a

    h e a v cane which in one

    :olony had been used i n beating t he na-

    ives.Oyer thi s aspect of the colonial

    ailure Herr Dernburg was fain

    t o

    glide

    ?asily; nor would it be just

    t o

    hold

    him responsible for the misconduct of

    nen appointed by his predecessors. Yet

    ,he need

    of

    reform in the treatment O

    ;he natlves. neither Herr Dernburg nor

    any one else can deny; in

    this

    respect

    the German colonial record

    is

    black, an d

    Debels assertions are no t t o be brushed

    asidewith a merecharge of exaggera-

    tion.

    The most significant passage in Jacob

    H Schlbs plea at the Zionist mass-

    meeting, in this cit y Sunday night, was

    addressed

    to

    the secret gents of the

    Russian Government, of whose pres-

    ence in he meeting the speaker felt

    convlnced:

    I say t o YOU, is

    it

    any wonder that he

    in become revolutionists?

    It

    s

    not himself that has made the a

    ment.

    revolutlonlst; it is the Russlan

    Govern-

    This is a clear admission tha t th e Jews

    in Russlahave become revolutionary.

    Therehas always been a pronounced

    tendency to slur over thepart played

    by Jews in he present Russian disor-

    ders, withhe benevolent object,

    no

    doubt. of representing th em as th e n-

    nocent vlctims of sa murderous autocra-

    Especially afterhe different

    p o -

    g roms , the sympatheticpress has been

    at p a l m to refuteall stories as t o the

    responsibllity of Je ms h revolutionaries

    for

    th e outbreak of massacre. It is true

    that he victlms are

    for

    the most

    part

    innooent and inoffensive, but it, is no

    service to their cause to evade the fact

    that the Russian Jews are the mam

    sup-

    port of the revolution, and he most

    dangerousenemies of th e existing re-

    gime. This onlyerves to ring ut

    in a clearer light he iniquities of a

    system that has driven an entire people

    to desperate resistawe,not only

    ish sociallsts nd agnostics, b u t even

    that large part of the race which

    1s

    capable

    of

    cherishing so idealistic

    Iream as Zionism.

    Increase in he consumption of ab-

    sinthe 1s causing some uneasiness i n

    Europe In Belgium, a law has lately

    been passed forbiddmg its manufacture,

    importation, transportation, or sale. A

    similarmeasurewas adopted in the

    Canton of Vaud, by a popular vote. The

    Cathollc Congress of Fribourg passed

    resolutions approving this Swiss initia-

    tive

    In

    the des Ddbats. Dr.

    Daremberg states that in 1884 France

    2onsumed absinthe

    t o

    the amount of ~

    19,335 hectolitres, in 1894, 125,078, and

    ,n 1904,

    207,929. It is said hat he ab-

    jinthe habit prevails especially among

    ;he younger llteraryolk; but

    it is

    spreading rapidly among business men.

    Ihe hab lt increases the liability

    t o

    tu-

    Jerculosis, for most patients in the con-

    jumptive hospitals in France have been

    tbsinthe-drinkersThesubject is one of

    nterest in the United Statesalso; f o r

    .uring the ast twenty-five years here

    .as been a considerable iqcrease

    in

    ab-

    inthe drinking here; it

    is

    usually ak-

    n

    in

    the form of vermouth, which

    is

    an

    ofusion of-absinthe in white wine.

  • 7/23/2019 December 10, 1905

    4/4