Day Hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders Dr. Simon Benson ST2 General Practice.
-
Upload
peregrine-johnson -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Day Hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders Dr. Simon Benson ST2 General Practice.
Day Hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders
Dr. Simon BensonST2 General Practice
Journal Club
Cochrane Review
Day hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders (Review)
Marshall M, Crowther R, Almaraz-Serrano AM, Sledge WH, Kluiter H, Roberts C, Hill E, Wiers
D
Background
Inpatient treatment is an expensive way of caring for patients with acute psychiatric disorders and surveys suggest that it is often unnecessary.
Can patients with psychiatric disorders be cared for in a day hospital environment versus inpatient care?
What is a day hospital?
A unit that provides diagnostic and treatment services for acutely ill patients that would otherwise be treated as inpatients.
Patients attend during the day but sleep at home
Objectives
To assess the effects of admission to a day hospital compared to inpatient care
To determine what proportion of acutely ill patients were suitable for day hospital treatment
To determine whether patients recover at the same rate in terms of symptoms and social functioning
Selection Criteria
Randomised Controlled Trials
Patients with acute psychiatric disorders needing admission if not alternative available
Majority of patients included between 18 and 65yo
Primary diagnosis of substance abuse excluded
Organic cause excluded
Interventions
1. Acute psychiatric day hospital (unit that provides diagnostic and treatment services)
2. Standard inpatient care
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measure
Loss to follow up
Secondary Outcome Measures
Feasability and engagementExtent of admissionClinical OutcomesSocial OutcomesCosts of Care
Literature Search
1. CINAHL (1982-2000)2. Cochrane Library (1980-2000)3. Embase (1980-2000)4. Medline (1966-2000)5. PsycLit (1967-2000)
Search term
[((DAY adj2 HOSP*) or (DAY adj2 CARE) or (DAY adj2 TREATMENT*) or (DAY adj2 CENT*) or (DAY adj2 UNIT*) or (PARTIAL adj2 HOSP*) or (DISPENSARY)) AND MENTAL DISORDERS/All subheadings exploded]
Data Collection
Selection of Trials
Two independent assessors blindly reviewed retrieved abstracts and selected papers for inclusion. There was complete agreement.
Quality Assessment
Only trials in categories A and B were included
Feasability of day hospital care
Defined as percentage reduction in acute inpatient admission
Results
81 studies identified
64 excluded (43 not randomised and 21 randomised)7 studies awaiting assessment1 ongoing study
9 trials included (2268 participants)Two types
1 - (patients ineligible for day care excluded before randomisation)2 – (all patients presenting were randomised)
Results
2 studies in Manchester, UK (1990, 1996)1 study in Dundee, Scotland (1985)4 studies in USA (1964, 1965, 1971)
2 studies in Netherlands (1989, 1993)
Number of participants varied from 90 to 378No pre-test power calculation performed
Results
Interventions for day hospital varied
All were staffed by nurses and occupational therapists
Three had out of hours cover
One had community input to check on DNAs
All had some form of psychotherapy in addition to medication
Results
Clinical and Social Outcomes assessed by:
Present State ExaminationComprehensive Psychopathology ScaleBrief Psychopathology Rating ScaleClinical Interview ScaleSocial Behaviour Assessment ScheduleSocial Adjustment Scale
Risk of Bias
Allocation concealment adequate in 5 of 9 trialsBlinding not possible in this type of study
Follow-up rates varied from 59-92%No differences reported in individual data
Key Results
Feasability of day hospital treatment(percentage reduction in acute admissions)
Type 1 trials = 37.5%Type 2 trials = 18.4 – 39.1%
Combined: 23% (n=2268, CI 21-25)
Key Results
Loss to follow up
Five type 1 trials and one type 2 trial reported
No difference between inpatient and day hospital treatment (n=667, RR=0.97, CI 0.74-1.27)
Other Results
No differences in total number of days of treatment between the two patient groups
(n=465, 3 RCTs, WMD -0.38 days/month CI -1.32 to 0.55)
Other Results
There was no significant difference in readmission rates between day hospital patients and controls
(n=667, RR 0.91 CI 0.72 to 1.15)
Other Results
For patients judged suitable for day hospital care, there was evidence to suggest a more rapid
improvement in mental state
(n=407, Chi-squared 9.66, p=0.002)
But not social functioning
(n= 295, Chi-squared 0.006, p=0.941)
Compared to inpatient controls
Cost of Care
Day hospital care was between 33.5% and 49.6% cheaper for the initial admission
Day hospital care was between 20.9% and 36.9% cheaper in total cost of care.
Important Limitations
Good quality in terms of allocation concealment
Only RCTs used
None were blind to group allocation
Sub-optimal follow-up rates (less than 80%)
Effect on suicide rates on mortality would have been useful
Key Messages
Potential to reduce hospital admissions by 23%
Evidence suggests that in terms of clinical and social outcomes there is no difference in
efficacy
Significant cost savings are possible
Implications for PracticeAcute day hospitals can achieve a reduction in
inpatient admissions but these need to be outweighed against other community based initiatives such as assertive outreach (23%
compared to 55%)
Cost savings are substantial but it relies on the closure of inpatient beds to shift the cost
equation of care in favour of day hospitals
Where do day hospitals fit with the vast number of services available already – can others
achieve?
Thankyou for listening
Questions / Discussion