Daisy robert midrand taylor francis indaba
-
Upload
taylor-francis-africa -
Category
Education
-
view
45 -
download
0
Transcript of Daisy robert midrand taylor francis indaba
Panel Discussion: Role of Policy in guiding development.
Taylor & Francis 2015 African Editorial Indaba20 March Gallagher Estates
Daisy Selematsela (PhD)Knowledge Management Corporate
NRF OA Statement reflection:
• International Council for Science (ICSU)– Provided input & endorsed ICSU OA Statement– unites representatives of 120 national scientific academies and 31 international scientific unions
• 5 key goals for open access, and • 12 recommendations
2
NRF OA Statement reflection:• ICSU five goals
– access to the scientific record should be free of financial barriers for any researcher to contribute to;
– free of financial barriers for any user to access immediately on publication;
– made available without restriction on reuse for any purpose, subject to proper attribution;
– quality‐assured and published in a timelymanner; – and archived and made available in perpetuity.
3
Africa Global Research Council activities
• 24 November 2011 (South Africa)• Theme: Principles for global merit (peer) review – Eastern,
Central & Southern African Countries workshop• Objective: “develop a foundation for international scientific
collaboration, elucidating acceptable merit review principles with a subsequent goal of establishing mechanisms that put them in place “ – inspired virtual GRC formation
• Countries: Botswana, Kenya, Malawi, Tanzania, Mozambique, Uganda, Zambia, US (National Science Foundation)
• Co‐hosted:– US NSF
4
Africa Global Research Council activities
• 22 ‐ 23 March 2012 (South Africa)• Theme: New approaches to international peer review
• Objective: to contribute towards the NSF‐initiated Global Merit Review process
• Co‐hosted:– Association of Commonwealth Universities (ACU)
• 25 organisations represented
5
Africa Global Research Council activities
• 29 November 2012 (Addis Ababa)• 1st Africa GRC Regional meeting• Theme: “Integrating National Science Institutions with
Regional and Global initiatives: Open Access and Research Integrity”.
• Objective: to obtain inputs to best practices and standards on research integrity and open access for publications in the African region; – Outputs to serve as preparation for the annual GRC global meeting of
May 2013 (Berlin)• Co‐hosted:
– TWAS, AU, USA NSF & German Research Foundation
6
Africa Global Research Council activities
• Oct/Dec 2013 ‐ GRC global participatory process (5 regional meetings Africa, the Americas, Asia, Europe, Middle East/North Africa)
7
Africa Global Research Council activities
• 25 – 26 November 2013 (South Africa)• 2nd Africa GRC Regional meeting• Objectives:
– Consider Review template for implementation of GRC Open Access Action Plan (supplemented by the background document Action plan towards open access to publications endorsed at Berlin Summit).
– Consider Statement of principles for funding the future.
– Participants:• AU, Kenya (NCST), CODESRIA, China (CAS), Japan (JSPS), Lesotho, USA (NSF), South African Young Academy of Science (SAYAS) and SA (NRF)
8
Africa Global Research Council activities
• May 2014 – 3rd Global Research Council Summit, Beijing – OA Action Plan and Review Template (country inputs)
9
Africa Global Research Council activities
• 23 – 25 November 2014 (South Africa)• 3rd Africa Regional Consultation of the Global Research
Council• Theme:
– “Research Funding for Scientific Breakthrough” and
– “Building Research and Education Capacity”
• Co‐hosted:– South Africa (NRF) and Namibia (Namibian Council on Research, Science
and Technology ‐ NCRST).
• Participants:– 26 Heads of Africa Research Councils / representatives
10
4th Global Research Council Annual Meeting
• 26 – 28 May 2015 (Japan)
• Theme:– “Research Funding for Scientific Breakthrough” and
– “Building Research and Education Capacity”
• Co‐host: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) and the National Research Foundation (NRF)
11
NRF OA Statement reflection:
• Global Research Council– Funding agencies – important role in initiating & shaping OA transition
– Success of Gold/Green Route depends on the understanding/readiness of the research community
12
Principles of a transition???
• How the transition to OA can be initiated?
• How the evolving OA environment can be sustained after the transition phase?
13
Transition to OA requires actions from other stakeholders:
NRF Recognised InstitutionsUniversities
Research LibrariesScholarly AssociationsPublishing Houses
What a Funding Agency is expected to do!
• By recommending/requiring OA to publicly funded research results– Ensure investment has optimal impact on science and society
– Requires thorough monitoring of funded publications and related costs
– Ensure research data whether already in existence/yet to be produced is accessible
• research data “ factual records used as primary sources for scientific research…commonly accepted in scientific community necessary to validate research findings. A research data set constitutes a systematic, partial representation of the subject being investigated ”
15
Elements of transition to OA
• Funders expected to pickup suggestions (action plans) which it can implement in accordance with its general working principles
16
What Funding Agencies can do! • Develop open access
statement/policies
• Address copyright
• explains reasons to have research results made openly available.
• Important guidance for all grantees.
• Funding guidelines modified in a manner that prevents researchers to transfer copyright exclusively to a publisher.
• Provide legal basis for deposit of research articles in an OA repository.
• Within a grant proposal, allow grantees to apply for an earmarked budget to cover publication fees etc.
17
What Funding Agencies can do! • Cover publication fees
• Contribute to central publication funds
• Within a grant proposal, allow grantees to apply for an earmarked budget to cover publication fees etc.
• Publication fees not given to researchers directly but to university as contribution to a central OA publication fund.
18
What Funding Agencies can do!
• Reimburse publication costs after grant expiry
• Be clear on numbers and statistics
• Decision on whether to apply for reimbursement of OA publications charges after grant period is expired?
• A clear picture on how much budget is spent for OA publication fees.
19
What Funding Agencies can do! • Define re‐use rights
• Support open access journals run by academia
• agree on specific criteria that need to be fulfilled for the reimbursement of article fees! – re‐use of OA articles as defined by CC‐BY licenses.
• ONLY then researchers' will be able to exploit full potential of digital publications, including text and data mining.
• Consider options to support OA journals sustained by institutional/organisationalfunding
20
What Funding Agencies can do!
• Share costs with fellow agencies
• Much research is carried out in international teams whose work is funded by a variety of agencies.
21
Research performers/Univ. Management & Libraries involvement
• Define open access policies• Nominate contact persons for OA• Operate an OA repositories• Enable universities to calculate• Enable Univ. to build publication budgets• Correlate subscription licenses with OA
22
Researchers, Scholarly Associations, Students involvement
• Raise awareness and support knowledge and acceptance of OA
• Make authors think about costs and quality
• Define payment schemes for authors unable to pay
• Educate students on scholarly publishing
23
Publisher involvement
• Be clear on conditions of self‐archiving‐Sherpa/RoMEO
• Define services –expected and want to buy
• Facilitate dealing with the practicalities of billing for OA
• Enable the transition
• Initiate earmarked funding programmes – i.eexisting journal subscriptions are switched into OA journals
• Revisit the hybrid model
24
Government /Industry/Public involvement
• Consider national copyright regulations
• OA polices that support commercial re‐use of research results
• Contribution to dissemination costs
• Conversations with Public regarding benefits of OA to society as a whole!
25
What NRF OA Statement is about!• Not intended to place restrictions on type of publications to place on IR
• Will not routinely check compliance with Cis –institution responsible (DA’s)
• Material published in respect of NRF funded research activity be included in IR, non‐inclusion provided in Final Grant Report by Cis.
26
What NRF OA Statement is about!
• Not intended to apply to research data gathered for the purpose of commercialisationof research outcomes, or
• To research data that are the property of a private sector entity
• Compatibility of technical & procedural standards – relevant international data & documentation standards (interdisciplinary access to & use of research data).
27
Thank you
•
28