D P S D P , Y P GRID - Denver · 2016-05-13 · 5.0. 10.0. 15.0. 20.0. 25.0. 30.0. 35.0. 40.0 new...

15
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DENVER POLICE, Y OUTH PROGRAMS, AND GRID PEAK PERFORMANCE REVIEW MARCH 16, 2016 2015 PERFORMANCE REVIEW 2016 INNOVATION PLANNING

Transcript of D P S D P , Y P GRID - Denver · 2016-05-13 · 5.0. 10.0. 15.0. 20.0. 25.0. 30.0. 35.0. 40.0 new...

Page 1: D P S D P , Y P GRID - Denver · 2016-05-13 · 5.0. 10.0. 15.0. 20.0. 25.0. 30.0. 35.0. 40.0 new york el paso san diego san jose los angeles honolulu chicago denver philadelphia

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETYDENVER POLICE, YOUTH PROGRAMS, AND GRID

PEAK PERFORMANCE REVIEWMARCH 16, 2016

2015 PERFORMANCE REVIEW

2016 INNOVATION PLANNING

Page 2: D P S D P , Y P GRID - Denver · 2016-05-13 · 5.0. 10.0. 15.0. 20.0. 25.0. 30.0. 35.0. 40.0 new york el paso san diego san jose los angeles honolulu chicago denver philadelphia

Performance Overview:GRID

0

5

10

15

20

25

2014 2015

8

23Gang Related Homicides

187.5%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Dist 1 Dist 2 Dist 3 Dist 4 Dist 5 Dist 6

Gang Related/Motivated Incidents by Police District in

2015

2015

2016Faith-Based Outreach Workers

Page 3: D P S D P , Y P GRID - Denver · 2016-05-13 · 5.0. 10.0. 15.0. 20.0. 25.0. 30.0. 35.0. 40.0 new york el paso san diego san jose los angeles honolulu chicago denver philadelphia

Mission Level Metrics:Denver Police

3

PART 1 REPORTED OFFENSES

TYPE OF OFFENSE

JAN-DEC 2014

JAN-DEC 2015 CHANGE

# # # % change

VIOLENT CRIME

Homicide 31 56 25 80.6%Sexual Assault 486 537 51 10.5%Robbery 1,098 1,233 135 12.3%Aggravated Assault 2,397 2,717 320 13.4%

SUBTOTAL 4,012 4,543 531 13.2%

PART 1 PROPERTY

Burglary 4,528 4,748 220 4.9%Larceny (Except Theft from MV) 9,425 8,884 -541 -5.7%Theft from Motor Vehicle 5,189 6,227 1,038 20.0%Auto theft 3,401 4,294 893 26.3%Arson 126 101 -25 -19.8%

SUBTOTAL 22,669 24,254 1,585 7.0%PART 1 TOTAL 26,681 28,797 2,116 7.9%

Page 4: D P S D P , Y P GRID - Denver · 2016-05-13 · 5.0. 10.0. 15.0. 20.0. 25.0. 30.0. 35.0. 40.0 new york el paso san diego san jose los angeles honolulu chicago denver philadelphia

Mission Level Metrics:Denver Police

4

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

NEW

YOR

K

EL P

ASO

SAN

DIE

GO

SAN

JOSE

LOS

ANG

ELES

HON

OLUL

U

CHIC

AGO

DEN

VER

PHIL

ADEL

PHIA

DAL

LAS

PHOE

NIX

FORT

WOR

TH

COLU

MBU

S

JACK

SON

VILL

E

LOUI

SVIL

LE M

ETRO

NAS

HVIL

LE

OKLA

HOM

A CI

TY

MIL

WAU

KEE

HOU

STON

SAN

AN

TON

IO

DET

ROIT

BALT

IMOR

E

SEAT

TLE

ALBU

QUER

QUE

TUCS

ON

MEM

PHIS

SAN

FRA

NCI

SCO

2014 Rate 2015 Rate

FBI UCR Large Cities (500K+)8th Safest Large City

Jan-Jun 2015Part 1 Crimes

Per 1,000 Residents

Page 5: D P S D P , Y P GRID - Denver · 2016-05-13 · 5.0. 10.0. 15.0. 20.0. 25.0. 30.0. 35.0. 40.0 new york el paso san diego san jose los angeles honolulu chicago denver philadelphia

Mission Level Metrics:Denver Police

5

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Neighborhood Safety 88% 89% 88% 88% 88% 88% 90% 93% 92% 91% 90% 90% 90% 90%Downtown Safety 80% 82% 78% 77% 80% 80% 84% 82% 84% 83% 80% 80% 79% 78%Overall Safety 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 70% 73% 66%

88% 89% 88% 88% 88% 88%90%

93%92% 91% 90% 90% 90% 90%

80%82%

78% 77%

80% 80%

84%82%

84% 83%

80% 80% 79% 78%

70% 73%

66%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

Perceptions of Safety

Page 6: D P S D P , Y P GRID - Denver · 2016-05-13 · 5.0. 10.0. 15.0. 20.0. 25.0. 30.0. 35.0. 40.0 new york el paso san diego san jose los angeles honolulu chicago denver philadelphia

Mission Level Metrics:Denver Police

6

64%

59%

63% 66% 62% 63%

58% 59%

47%

39%

38%

49%

46%

47% 47%

43%

38% 38%

45%

51% 52%

45% 44%

48%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Citizen Satisfaction

Police services Crime prevention Traffic enforcement

Page 7: D P S D P , Y P GRID - Denver · 2016-05-13 · 5.0. 10.0. 15.0. 20.0. 25.0. 30.0. 35.0. 40.0 new york el paso san diego san jose los angeles honolulu chicago denver philadelphia

Mission Level Metrics:Denver Police

7

Response Time from 911 to ArrivalPriority 0-2 Calls Avg Response Time

from 911 to ArrivalPriority 3-6 Calls Avg Response Time

from 911 to Arrival

Jan-Dec 2014 Jan-Dec 2015 Change Jan-Dec 2014 Jan-Dec 2015 ChangeDistrict 1 13:25 12:42 - 43 sec 25:58 26:16 18 secDistrict 2 13:30 13:15 - 15 sec 25:34 27:22 1 min 48 secDistrict 3 15:57 16:17 20 sec 27:45 29:24 1 min 39 secDistrict 4 14:48 14:22 - 26 sec 29:10 29:08 -2 secDistrict 5 15:21 14:57 - 24 sec 28:01 29:19 1 min 18 secDistrict 6 11:49 11:33 - 16 sec 24:13 26:16 2 min 3 secCitywide 14:05 13:48 -17 sec 26:40 27:57 1 min 17 sec

-43 sec-15 sec

20 sec

-26 sec -24 sec -16 sec -17 sec

18 sec

1 min 48 sec 1 min 39 sec

-2 sec

1 min 18 sec

2 min 3 sec

1 min 17 sec

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 District 6 Citywide

Change in Average Response Time in Minutes from 911 to Arrival

Priority 0-2 Calls Avg Response Time from 911 to Arrival Priority 3-6 Calls Avg Response Time from 911 to Arrival

Page 8: D P S D P , Y P GRID - Denver · 2016-05-13 · 5.0. 10.0. 15.0. 20.0. 25.0. 30.0. 35.0. 40.0 new york el paso san diego san jose los angeles honolulu chicago denver philadelphia

Mission Level Metrics:Denver Police

8

Calls For ServiceCitizen Initiated Calls for Service Officer Initiated Calls for ServiceJan-Dec

2014Jan-Dec

2015 ChangeJan-Dec

2014Jan-Dec

2015 ChangeDistrict 1 48,215 49,715 3.1% 46,327 47,732 3.0%District 2 49,076 51,183 4.3% 34,908 31,452 -9.9%District 3 66,339 69,848 5.3% 30,593 34,183 11.7%District 4 42,767 44,029 3.0% 34,717 31,951 -8.0%District 5 32,704 35,434 8.3% 26,799 28,244 5.4%District 6 56,027 61,662 10.1% 36,767 37,365 1.6%Citywide 297,970 314,498 5.5% 216,429 217,096 0.3%

3.1%4.3%

5.3%3.0%

8.3%10.1%

5.5%

3.0%

-9.9%

11.7%

-8.0%

5.4%

1.6% 0.3%

-15.0%

-10.0%

-5.0%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 District 6 Citywide

Change in Calls for Service

Citizen Initiated Calls for Service Officer Initiated Calls for Service

Page 9: D P S D P , Y P GRID - Denver · 2016-05-13 · 5.0. 10.0. 15.0. 20.0. 25.0. 30.0. 35.0. 40.0 new york el paso san diego san jose los angeles honolulu chicago denver philadelphia

Performance Overview:Denver Police

9

Proactive Time

Case Closure

Response Times

Perceptions of Safety

Apprehension of Offenders

Customer Service

Crime Prevention

Felony Arrests2014 20155,809 6,65214.5% Increase

Crime Rate

Page 10: D P S D P , Y P GRID - Denver · 2016-05-13 · 5.0. 10.0. 15.0. 20.0. 25.0. 30.0. 35.0. 40.0 new york el paso san diego san jose los angeles honolulu chicago denver philadelphia

Performance Overview:Denver Police

2920 3001 30802613 2754 2865 2977 2823 2790 2971 3153

26482133

2729 27372480 2445

29713411

3112 30783635

40133640 3762

4386 4538

66.7%66.9%64.6%65.3%

71.0%70.2%65.0%

67.8%67.7%67.3%61.9%61.6%

66.7%66.3%69.7%

72.6%76.3%

79.8%81.6%80.4%81.9%83.9%82.0%79.6%82.4%80.8%80.2%

68.8%66.9%66.8%67.7%67.8%66.1%64.6%65.6%65.7%63.9%62.6%63.8%63.4%61.4%60.9%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Person Crime Caseload and Clearance at 75 DaysRelationship between caseload and next quarter clearance

R-square = .40, p < .01

Caseload - Person Cleared - Person % Predicted Clearance

Page 11: D P S D P , Y P GRID - Denver · 2016-05-13 · 5.0. 10.0. 15.0. 20.0. 25.0. 30.0. 35.0. 40.0 new york el paso san diego san jose los angeles honolulu chicago denver philadelphia

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Monthly Class 2 Productivity Citywide

1 = 2008 DPD Baseline of1 class 2 action every 2 hours of discretionary time

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Chief White Appointed

New commanders Appointed

Departmental Right Sizing

12 Hour Shifts in District 6Team Policing Implemented

New Police DistrictsSgt Leadership Training Completed

Civilian Report Writers DeployedInternet in Police Cars

New Commanders Appointed

198% Increase in Officer Productivityfrom 2011 to 2015

Page 12: D P S D P , Y P GRID - Denver · 2016-05-13 · 5.0. 10.0. 15.0. 20.0. 25.0. 30.0. 35.0. 40.0 new york el paso san diego san jose los angeles honolulu chicago denver philadelphia

Innovation Overview:Denver Police

Mobile Fingerprinting

Electronic Ticketing

Crisis Intervention Response UnitCo-responder ModelElectronic

Log Sheets

VirTra 300Training Simulator

Page 13: D P S D P , Y P GRID - Denver · 2016-05-13 · 5.0. 10.0. 15.0. 20.0. 25.0. 30.0. 35.0. 40.0 new york el paso san diego san jose los angeles honolulu chicago denver philadelphia

Innovation Overview:Denver Police

Sanctity of Human Life

Higher StandardsCritical Decision

Making

De-Escalation

Trust & Collaboration

Meaningful Training

Effective Communication

Less Lethal

Tactics on Mental Health Issues

Use of Force:Taking Policing to a Higher Standard

Page 14: D P S D P , Y P GRID - Denver · 2016-05-13 · 5.0. 10.0. 15.0. 20.0. 25.0. 30.0. 35.0. 40.0 new york el paso san diego san jose los angeles honolulu chicago denver philadelphia

Performance Overview:Youth Programs

90%

80%

79%

78%

77%

76%

Community Needs Surveyand Proactivity

ProactiveCommunityContacts

Expungements

93% 92%No Tickets

2012

2013

2014

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

SuccessfulCompletionRecidivism

UnsuccessfulCompletionRecidivism

10.0%

21.6%11.8%

25.8%

9.1%

25.0%

Diversion Success

Youth Diversion Recidivism Rates 2012 2013 2014Successful Completion Recidivism 10.0% 11.8% 9.1%Unsuccessful Completion Recidivism 21.6% 25.8% 25.0%

Youth Diversion Successful Completion 79.2% 79.0% 79.5%

Page 15: D P S D P , Y P GRID - Denver · 2016-05-13 · 5.0. 10.0. 15.0. 20.0. 25.0. 30.0. 35.0. 40.0 new york el paso san diego san jose los angeles honolulu chicago denver philadelphia

Innovation Overview:Youth Programs

(Secondary Prevention)

Youth Arrests

Strengthening Families and Communities Reward Program

Runaway Case Closure

Outside Referrals

Staff

Process

Customer Satisfaction

ExitInterviews