Cytokine Therapy
-
Upload
samarqandi -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Cytokine Therapy
-
7/28/2019 Cytokine Therapy
1/5
2001;61:3281-3284.Cancer ResFrank Lohr, David Y. Lo, David A. Zaharoff, et al. Electroporationin VivoCombined withEffective Tumor Therapy with Plasmid-encoded Cytokines
Updated version
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/61/8/3281Access the most recent version of this article at:
Cited Articles http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/61/8/3281.full.html#ref-list-1This article cites by 28 articles, 7 of which you can access for free at:
Citing articles
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/61/8/3281.full.html#related-urlsThis article has been cited by 9 HighWire-hosted articles. Access the articles at:
E-mail alerts related to this article or journal.Sign up to receive free email-alerts
SubscriptionsReprints and
To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications
Permissions
To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, contact the AACR Publications
Research.on March 27, 2013. 2001 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.orgDownloaded from
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/61/8/3281http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/61/8/3281http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/61/8/3281.full.html#ref-list-1http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/61/8/3281.full.html#ref-list-1http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/61/8/3281.full.html#related-urlshttp://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/61/8/3281.full.html#related-urlshttp://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/alertshttp://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/alertsmailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/alertshttp://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/61/8/3281.full.html#related-urlshttp://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/61/8/3281.full.html#ref-list-1http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/61/8/3281 -
7/28/2019 Cytokine Therapy
2/5
[CANCER RESEARCH 61, 32813284, April 15, 2001]
Advances in Brief
Effective Tumor Therapy with Plasmid-encoded Cytokines Combined with in
Vivo Electroporation1
Frank Lohr,2 David Y. Lo, David A. Zaharoff, Kang Hu, Xiuwu Zhang, Yongping Li, Yulin Zhao,
Mark W. Dewhirst, Fan Yuan, and Chuan-Yuan Li3
Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710 [F. L., D. Y. L., K. H., X. Z., Y. L., Y. Z., M. W. D., C-Y. L.], and Department
of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 [D. A. Z., F. Y.]
Abstract
Plasmids may have unique advantages as a gene delivery system.
However, a major obstacle is the low in vivo transduction efficiency. In
this study, an electroporation-based gene transduction approach was
taken to study the effect ofinterleukin (IL)-2 or IL-12 gene transduction on
the growth of experimental murine tumors. Significant intratumoral gene
transduction was achieved by electroporation of tumors that had been
injected with naked plasmids encoding reporter genes and cytokine genes
(IL-2 and IL-12) under the control of a constitutive cytomegalovirus
promoter. In addition, significant tumor growth delay could be achieved
in a murine melanoma line B16.F10 with the cytokine genes. Most impor-
tantly, systemic transgene levels were negligible when compared with
intratumoral adenovirus-mediated IL-12 gene delivery, which leads to
significantly higher systemic cytokine levels. Therefore, naked plasmid-
and in vivo electroporation-mediated cancer gene therapy may be thera-
peutically efficacious while maintaining low systemic toxicity.
Introduction
Recombinant viral vectors account for the majority of gene delivery
approaches used in current cancer gene therapy studies. Examples
include adenovirus, herpes virus, and retrovirus vectors. The main
advantage of viral vectors is their high efficiency of gene transduction.
However, there are also many potential problems, such as efficiency
of production and safety. For example, adenovirus is one of the most
commonly used vector systems for gene therapy. Most of the adeno-
virus vectors used are rendered replication deficient. However, it has
been reported that new unwanted variants can develop as a result of
recombination during the production process. In addition, adenovi-
ruses can elicit strong immune responses that will diminish efficacy in
later administrations and could represent a hazard for adverse reac-
tions. At higher doses, biosafety is also a big concern. For example,
even with strictly local infection, there may be systemic toxicity
because of virus leaking into the systemic circulation, then infecting
the liver with high efficiency (1, 2).
Plasmid DNA, on the other hand, is a relatively safe alternative to
viral vectors. The toxicity is generally very low, and large-scale
production is relatively easy. However, a major obstacle that has
prevented the widespread application of plasmid DNA is its relative
inefficiency in gene transduction. Therefore, most applications for
plasmid DNA have been limited to vaccine studies with a few excep-
tions (35).
Methods that can significantly enhance the efficiency of plasmid
DNA transduction efficiency will greatly extend the utility of this
promising mode of gene transfer. Electroporation has long been used
to effectively transport molecules, including DNA, into living cells in
vitro (6). More recent reports demonstrated that it can safely be used
in vivo, e.g., by enhancing the local efficacy of chemotherapeutic
agents (7, 8). When used in conjunction with DNA plasmids, it greatly
enhances the local transfection efficiency over plasmid injection
alone (9).
In this study, we applied this new approach to antitumor immuno-
gene therapy. We report the effectiveness and possible advantages of
local gene therapy with plasmid encoded mIL-24 and mIL-12 in
combination with in vivo electroporation in a murine melanoma tumor
model with particular attention to intratumoral and systemic transgene
levels.
Materials and Methods
Tumor Models/Cell Culture. B16.F10 (American Type Culture Collec-
tion, Manassas, Virginia) is a metastasizing subline of the B16 melanoma that
arose spontaneously and is syngeneic with C57BL/6 mice. In vitro it is
maintained in DMEM. Transplantation into C57BL/6 mice at 106 cells/animal
establishes tumors in 100% of mice. 293 cells (American Type Culture
Collection, Manassas, Virginia) were used for adenovirus propagation andwere maintained in DMEM as well. All cell culture media were supplemented
with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT) and 1 g each of penicillin/
streptomycin (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY) per 100 ml.
Plasmids. The pEGFP-N1 plasmid was obtained from Clontech Corp.
(Palo Alto, CA). It encodes the EGFP protein under the control of a CMV
promoter. Plasmid pNGVL-mIL2 and pNGVL-mIL12 were obtained from the
NGVL at the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, MI). They encode mIL-2
and mIL-12 genes under the control of the CMV promoters, respectively.
Plasmid pNGVL--gal was also obtained from the NGVL. It encodes a nuclear
targeted -gal gene under the control of the CMV promoter.
Adenovirus Vector. The adenoviral vector AdIL12 (kindly provided by
Dr. Frank L. Graham, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada) used
in this study was described previously and is based on an Ad5 recombinant
system (10). In short, both mIL-12 subunit cDNAs were inserted in the E1
region and placed under control of the murine CMV promoter. Efficientexpression of both IL-12 subunits was achieved by placing an internal ribo-
some entry site in-between. Viruses were propagated in 293 cells and purified
by CsCl banding according to a standard protocol (11).
In Vivo Electroporation and Adenovirus Infection. Animal care and
experimental procedures were in accord with institutional guidelines. All
animals were anesthetized before virus or plasmid injection/electroporation
with Ketamine/Xylazine at 1.8/0.15 mg/mouse. After tumors grew to sizes of
57 mm in diameter (or 65179 mm3 in volume), they were injected intratu-
morally either with AdIL12 (3 108 particles in 50 l of PBS) or with 50 g
Received 11/3/00; accepted 3/1/01.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page
charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with
18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.1 This study was supported by Grant CA81512 from the National Cancer Institute, a
grant from the Komen Foundation for Breast Cancer Research (to C-Y. L.), as well asGrants CA40355 and CA42745 from the National Cancer Institute (to M. W. D.). F. L. is
supported by Grant Lo 713/1-1 from the German Research Council (Deutsche Forsch-
ungsgemeinschaft).2 Present address: Department of Radiation Oncology, INF 400, University of Heidel-
berg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Radiation
Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3455, Durham, NC 27710. Phone:
(919) 681-4721; Fax: (919) 684-8718; E-mail: [email protected].
4 The abbreviations used are: mIL, murine interleukin; EGFP, enhanced green fluo-rescent protein; CMV, cytomegalovirus; NGVL, National Gene Vector Laboratory; -gal,
-galactosidase.
3281
Research.on March 27, 2013. 2001 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.orgDownloaded from
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/ -
7/28/2019 Cytokine Therapy
3/5
of either EGFP-, -gal-, mIL-2- or mlL12 plasmid in 50 l PBS. Animals
intended for combination treatment underwent subsequent electroporation
within 15 min. Electroporation pulses were delivered with 2 2-cm stainless
steel plates attached to a caliper electrode (Genetronics, Inc., San Diego, CA).
Electrode Gel (Signa Gel; Parker Laboratories, Inc., Fairfield, NJ) was applied
to the electrodes to reduce the interfacial resistance and maintain good elec-
trical contact between electrode and skin. The caliper electrodes were clamped
on the tumor in an approximate dorsal-ventral orientation to avoid placing any
bone within the electric field. The distance between electrodes was 6 mm.
Square wave electric pulses were generated with an Electro Square Porator
T820 (Genetronics, Inc.). Three pulses (100V/50 ms) were delivered, followed
by three more pulses at the opposite polarity. These electroporation parameters
were selected based on previous reports (1214) and our own preliminary
experiments.
Detection of Reporter Gene Expression. About 48 h after injection of
either EGFP or -gal plasmid injection with or without consecutive electro-
poration, animals were sacrificed, and tumors were harvested. Animals were
anesthetized and sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Tumors injected with -gal
plasmid were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS for 48 h at 4C. Tumors were
sectioned at 250 m. Sections were rinsed three times for 30 min each in rinse
buffer (100 mM sodium phosphate, 2 mM MgCl2
, 0.01% deoxycholic acid, and
0.02% NP40) at room temperature. Sections were stained for 24 h at room
temperature. Staining solution was rinse buffer, 5 m M potassium ferricyanide,
5 mM potassium ferrocyanide, and 1 mg/ml 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl--D-
galactopyranoside. After 24 h, staining solution was removed, and sections
were stored in 70% ethanol before mounting (in 70% ethanol) for microscopy.
For fluorescence microscopy, EGFP-injected tumors were sectioned fresh
(without freezing or fixation) at 250 m and mounted in PBS for immediate
microscopy. To visualize EGFP, a Xenon arc lamp and a FITC filter were used
on a Zeiss Axioskop. Images were acquired with a color CCD camera and
frame-grabbing equipment at identical magnification, light intensity, and am-
plification for each sample pair of tumors from electroporated or non-electro-
porated animals, respectively. Five to seven animals were used for each
treatment group.
Measurement of IL-12 Levels. mIL-12 levels in serum samples and tumor
extracts were detected with an mIL-12 ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneap-
olis, MN) that detects the heterodimer of p35 and p40 (p75) with a detection
level of 8 pg/ml. Serum was obtained from blood samples drawn from the tail
vein before and at different time points until 9 days after intratumoral AdIL12
injection or plasmid injection with consecutive electroporation in two to four
animals/data point. For detection of intratumoral mIL-12, untreated control
tumors and tumors at different time points after infection or plasmid injection/
electroporation were harvested (two to four animals/data point). Tumors were
homogenized in PBS (with Complete protease inhibitor; Boehringer Mann-
heim) and spun down, and supernatant was collected for measurement.
Tumor Growth Delay Studies. About 106 B16.F10 cells in 50 l of PBS
were transplanted in the right hind limbs of C57BL/6 mice. Treatment was
initiated when the tumors had reached a mean diameter of 57 mm (corre-
sponding to a tumor volume of 65179 mm3). Each treatment group consisted
of nine animals and was treated with a single intratumoral injection of 50 g
of plasmid encoding EGFP, mIL-2, or mIL-12 with or without subsequent
electroporation, respectively. The injection was carried out in 50 l of PBS.
Tumor volume was determined by measuring the largest (L) and the smallest
(S) diameters of the tumor and calculated as V /6(L S2). Growth curves
are plotted as the mean relative treatment group tumor volume SE. Relative
tumor growth rate were calculated for the first 6 days after treatment.
Histological Examination of the Tumors. Tumors from different treat-
ment groups were excised at the end of experiments (15 days after initial
treatment). They were then deep frozen in liquid nitrogen with Tissue-Tek
OCT compound (Sakura, Torrance, CA) as embedding medium, sectioned, and
mounted. They were then stained with H&E and evaluated at 400.
Results
Intratumoral Expression of Reporter Genes in Vivo. Electropo-
ration of the plasmids were carried out according to conditions estab-
lished by previous reports (1214) and our own experience. B16.F10
tumors grown to 57 mm in diameter (or 65179 mm3) in volume
were injected with the reporter plasmids. Expression of reporter genes
(EGFP and -gal) after plasmid injection and electroporation in
tumor tissue was assessed in fresh tissue sections (at 250 m) by light
microscopy (transmission and fluorescence imaging; Fig. 1). For both
reporter systems, very few cells were positive when only naked DNA
without consecutive electroporation was injected [Fig. 1a (EGFP) and
1c (-gal)]. The combination with electroporation resulted in consis-
tently efficient transduction of a higher number of cells with both
reporter genes [Fig. 1b (EGFP) and 1d(-gal)]. In EGFP experiments,
plasmid injection with electroporation allowed 38% (as evaluated by
fluorescence-activated flow cytometry) of all of the cells in the tumor
mass to be transduced with the EGFP gene in comparison with
0.1% in tumors injected with EGFP plasmid alone.
Intratumoral and Systemic Expression of Therapeutic Genes in
Vivo. To quantitatively evaluate local and systemic transgene expres-
sion as a consequence of electroporation and control gene transfer
approaches, mIL-12 (as a heterodimer of p35 and p40 subunits) levels
were assessed in tumor and serum of untreated and treated animals.
The mIL-12 levels in the serum and tumors were below the detection
threshold (8 pg/ml) in untreated or electroporation-alone control an-
imals. Fig. 2 is a summary of the peak mIL-12 levels in treated
animals. With the mIL-12 plasmid injection alone, the cytokine level
in the tumor reached from below the level of detection (day 2) to a
peak of 0.3 ng/g (day 5), whereas the level in the serum reached from
below the level of detection (day 2) to a peak of 0.4 ng/ml (day 5). Inthose tumors that were injected with the control GFP-encoding plas-
mid, the tumor and serum levels of the cytokine were similar to those
with mIL-12 alone, indicating that the low level of cytokine expres-
sion observed with the mIL-12 plasmid injection alone were perhaps
the result of DNA injection itself rather than any specific gene
expression. When mIL-12 plasmid injection was combined with elec-
troporation, the cytokine level reached 2.6 ng/g on day 2 and 5.4 ng/g
on day 5 in the tumor, whereas the level in the serum reached from
below the level of detection (day 2) to 0.35 ng/ml, similar to that
achieved with plasmid injection alone. In comparison, in animals that
were intratumorally injected with a therapeutically effective dose
[according to previous studies in our laboratory (15)] of 3 108
plaque-forming units of AdIL12, an adenovirus encoding the mIL-12
gene under the control of the CMV promoter, the mIL-12 levels were
Fig. 1. In vivo expression of reporter genes in B16.F10 melanoma 48 h after injection
of 50 g of EGFP or -gal plasmid (in 50 l of PBS) into tumors (at 57 mm in diameter
or 65179 mm3 in volume) with or without consecutive electroporation. Photomicro-
graphs (500) of: a, EGFP plasmid injection without electroporation; b, EGFP plasmid
injection with electroporation; c, -gal plasmid injection without electroporation; and d,-gal plasmid injection with electroporation. Sections were carried out at 250 m usingfresh tumor tissues that had not been fixed or frozen. In each group of experiments, five
to seven animals were used.
3282
TUMOR THERAPY WITH CYTOKINES AND ELECTROPORATION
Research.on March 27, 2013. 2001 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.orgDownloaded from
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/ -
7/28/2019 Cytokine Therapy
4/5
between 7.2 (day 2) and 5.7 ng/g (day 5) in the tumor, whereas the
peak value (at day 2) in the serum reached 20 ng/ml. For both
modalities, tumor mIL-12 levels returned to baseline at 9 days after
treatment. Therefore, significant tumor levels of IL-12 can be
achieved in vivo by combining mIL-12 plasmid injection and electro-
poration when compared with AdIL12 injection. Serum levels, how-
ever, were greatly elevated after local AdIL12 injection (reaching a
maximum of 20 ng/ml), while they were close to nonspecific DNA
control after the combination of plasmid injection and electroporation
(maximum of 0.4 ng/ml; Fig. 2). In addition, apparent toxicity was
observed in animals injected with AdIL12, consistent with our earlier
observations (15). The toxicities include weigh loss, apathy, and
splenomegaly (15).
Significant Tumor Growth Delay after Electro-Gene Therapy.
Experiments were then conducted to examine the antitumor efficacy
of the combined electroporation/plasmid DNA transfer approach. Fig.
3A shows the mean relative volumes ( SE) for B16.F10 tumors in
C57BL/6 mice treated with injections of control plasmid (EGFP),
mIL-2 or mIL-12 with or without in vivo electroporation. Fig. 3Bshows the relative growth rate of different groups in the first 6 days
after treatment. Electroporation in conjunction with control plasmid
(pEGFP-N1) did not result in significant growth delay over control
plasmid alone or nontreated controls. In addition, injections of naked
mIL-2 or mIL-12 plasmid alone did not result in any significant
growth delay over control plasmid. The combination of electropora-
tion with either mIL-2 or mIL-12 plasmid resulted in a significant
growth delay of approximately 515 days when compared with both
control plasmid plus electroporation (P 0.01) and the respective
naked cytokine plasmids (P 0.05), with mIL-12 plus electropora-
tion being the most effective. These experiments were conducted three
times to ensure the reproducibility of the experiments. In all three
experiments, a similar pattern of tumor growth delays was observed.
Additional experiments (with the IL-12 plasmid) indicate that it ispossible to carry out a second plasmid injection and electroporation to
extend the duration of tumor suppression (data not shown). As to the
mechanisms of the antitumor effect of IL-12, our past study (15)
indicates that stimulation of T cells, natural killer cells, and the
antiangiogenic properties of IL-12 all played important roles in sup-
pressing tumor growth in the B16.F10 model.
Discussion
IL-2 and IL-12 have shown promising antitumor effects in preclin-
ical studies by improving immune responses against tumors, although
their mechanism of action has not completely been elucidated as yet
(2, 10, 16 21). Exploitation of these antitumor properties in humans,
however, has thus far been hampered by significant systemic toxicity
(19, 2224). Confining the expression of those genes to the tumor by
using intratumoral injection of viral vectors had some success (10,
20). Even with this approach, however, dose-limiting systemic toxic-
ity has nevertheless been observed by several investigators in animal
models (1, 2, 15). Our observations of elevated serum levels of IL-12
in animals treated with intratumoral injection of adenovirus encoding
IL-12 and associated toxicities, most likely because of adenovirus
leaking into the systemic circulation and infecting parenchymatous
organs (24), fall in line with these reports.
Increasing the gene transduction efficiency of naked plasmid DNA
should alleviate some of the problems associated with virus-mediated
gene transfer. Recently, successful in vivo transfer of IL genes into
muscle (9) and of marker and therapeutic suicide genes into normal
tissues and tumors (9, 2528) have been reported. In this report, we
describe the efficient use of IL-based immunotherapy and electropo-
ration in a murine melanoma tumor. Our results support the idea that
the combination of injecting plasmids encoding secretable therapeutic
genes (such as IL-12) with electroporation leads to significant local
antitumor effects with reduced systemic cytokine levels when com-
pared with gene therapy based on an adenoviral vector. Even with the
simple electroporation protocol used in these experiments, satisfactory
local gene expression and a distinct therapeutic effect could be ob-served. Systemic transgene levels, however, were greatly reduced
with the plasmid/electroporation combination when compared with
the adenovirus approach. The observed lower systemic cytokine levels
Fig. 2. Maximum IL-12 levels in tumor and serum after intratumoral injection of IL-12
plasmid (50 g in 50 l) with consecutive electroporation or after intratumoral injectionof recombinant adenovirus encoding IL-12 (3 108 plaque-forming units of AdIL12). For
adenovirus, the samples were taken 2 days after viral injections. For plasmids, the samples
were taken 5 days after plasmid injection. The results are plotted as mean range of two
to four animals per data point; bars, SE.
Fig. 3. Results from tumor growth delay experiments. A, mean relative tumor volumes
(bars, SE) for B16.F10 in C57BL/6 mice tumors treated with injections of control plasmid
(EGFP), mIL-2 or mIL-12 with or without in vivo electroporation.f, no treatment control;
, EGFP plasmid alone; , EGFP plasmid electroporation (EP); E, mIL-2 plasmid
alone; F, mIL-2 plasmid EP;, mIL-12 plasmid alone; , mIL-12 plasmid EP. B,relative tumor growth rate in the first 6 days after treatment. The values represent the
slopes of the relative growth curve in A as calculated by linear curve fitting.
3283
TUMOR THERAPY WITH CYTOKINES AND ELECTROPORATION
Research.on March 27, 2013. 2001 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.orgDownloaded from
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/ -
7/28/2019 Cytokine Therapy
5/5
should reduce the systemic toxicity of DNA-based cytokine therapy.
Another advantage of this approach is its inherent low immunogenic-
ity, greatly facilitating multiple, repeated applications, which may be
necessary in many circumstances.
The transfection efficiency in vivo depends on a multitude of
parameters, such as the amount of plasmid, time between plasmid
injection and electroporation, temperature during electroporation, and
above all electrode geometry and pulse parameters (field strength,
pulse length, pulse sequence, and others; Refs. 26, 28, and 29). Much
progress has been made improving the electroporation paradigm, and
it is very likely that additional improvements will be achieved. Elec-
tro-gene therapy, therefore, may emerge as a viable alternative to
virus vector-based approaches, especially in tumors that are not easily
infected with the current vectors and when secretable therapeutic
genes are used.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Frank L. Graham of McMaster University for providing us
with the AdIL12 vector. We also thank the NGVL at the University of
Michigan for providing plasmids. We also express our gratitude to the anon-
ymous reviewers who provided many helpful suggestions for our manuscript.
References
1. Emtage, P. C., Wan, Y., Hitt, M., Graham, F. L., Muller, W. J., Zlotnik, A., and
Gauldie, J. Adenoviral vectors expressing lymphotactin and interleukin 2 or lympho-
tactin and interleukin 12 synergize to facilitate tumor regression in murine breast
cancer models. Hum. Gene Ther., 10: 697709, 1999.
2. Nasu, Y., Bangma, C. H., Hull, G. W., Lee, H. M., Hu, J., Wang, J., McCurdy, M. A.,Shimura, S., Yang, G., Timme, T. L., and Thompson, T. C. Adenovirus-mediated
interleukin-12 gene therapy for prostate cancer: suppression of orthotopic tumor
growth and pre-established lung metastases in an orthotopic model. Gene Ther., 6:
338349, 1999.
3. Yant, S., Meuse, L., Chiu, W., Ivics, A., Izsvak, Z., and Kay, M. Somatic integration
and long-term transgene expression in normal and haemophilic mice using a DNAtransposon system. Nat. Genet., 25: 3541, 2000.
4. Takeshita, S., Zheng, L. P., Brogi, E., Kearney, M., Pu, L. Q., Bunting, S., Ferrara,
N., Symes, J. F., and Isner, J. M. Therapeutic angiogenesis. A single intraarterial
bolus of vascular endothelial growth factor augments revascularization in a rabbit
ischemic hind limb model. J. Clin. Investig., 93: 662670, 1994.
5. Schratzberger, P., Schratzberger, G., Silver, M., Curry, C., Kearney, M., Magner, M.,Alroy, J., Adelman, L. S., Weinberg, D. H., Ropper, A. H., and Isner, J. M. Favorable
effect of VEGF gene transfer on ischemic peripheral neuropathy. Nat. Med., 6:
405413, 2000.6. Neumann, E., Schaefer-Ridder, M., Wang, Y., and Hofschneider, P. H. Gene transfer
into mouse lymphoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. EMBO J., 1:
841845, 1982.7. Hofmann, G. A., Dev, S. B., Nanda, G. S., and Rabussay, D. Electroporation therapy
of solid tumors. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst., 16: 523569, 1999.
8. Sersa, G., Stabuc, B., Cemazar, M., Miklavcic, D., and Rudolf, Z. Electrochemo-
therapy with cisplatin: clinical experience in malignant melanoma patients. Clin.
Cancer Res., 6: 863867, 2000.
9. Aihara, H., and Miyazaki, J. Gene transfer into muscle by electroporation in vivo. Nat.
Biotechnol., 16: 867870, 1998.
10. Putzer, B. M., Hitt, M., Muller, W. J., Emtage, P., Gauldie, J., and Graham, F. L.
Interleukin 12 and B7-1 costimulatory molecule expressed by an adenovirus vector
act synergistically to facilitate tumor regression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94:
1088910894, 1997.
11. Graham, F. L., and Prevec, L. Methods for construction of adenovirus vectors. Mol.
Biotechnol., 3: 207220, 1995.
12. Suzuki, T., Shin, B. C., Fujikura, K., Matsuzaki, T., and Takata, K. Direct gene
transfer into rat liver cells by in vivo electroporation. FEBS Lett., 425: 436440,
1998.
13. Mathiesen, I. Electropermeabilization of skeletal muscle enhances gene transfer in
vivo. Gene Ther., 6: 508514, 1999.
14. Harrison, R. L., Byrne, B. J., and Tung, L. Electroporation-mediated gene transfer incardiac tissue. FEBS Lett., 435: 15, 1998.
15. Lohr, F., Hu, K., Haroon, Z., Samulski, T. V., Huang, Q., Beaty, J., Dewhirst, M. W.,
and Li, C. Y. Combination treatment of murine tumors by adenovirus-mediated local
B7/IL12 immunotherapy and radiotherapy. Mol. Ther., 2: 195203, 2000.
16. Voest, E. E., Kenyon, B. M., OReilly, M. S., Truitt, G., DAmato, R. J., and
Folkman, J. Inhibition of angiogenesis in vivo by interleukin 12. J. Natl. Cancer Inst.,
87: 581586, 1995.
17. Brunda, M. J., Luistro, L., Warrier, R. R., Wright, R. B., Hubbard, B. R., Murphy, M.,
Wolf, S. F., and Gately, M. K. Antitumor and antimetastatic activity of interleukin 12
against murine tumors. J. Exp. Med., 178: 12231230, 1993.
18. Golab, J., and Zagozdzon, R. Antitumor effects of interleukin-12 in pre-clinical and
early clinical studies. Int. J. Mol. Med., 3: 537544, 1999.
19. Puisieux, I., Odin, L., Poujol, D., Moingeon, P., Tartaglia, J., Cox, W., and Favrot, M.
Canarypox virus-mediated interleukin 12 gene transfer into murine mammary ade-
nocarcinoma induces tumor suppression and long-term antitumoral immunity. Hum.
Gene. Ther., 9: 24812492, 1998.
20. Seetharam, S., Staba, M. J., Schumm, L. P., Schreiber, K., Schreiber, H., Kufe, D. W.,
and Weichselbaum, R. R. Enhanced eradication of local and distant tumors by
genetically produced interleukin-12 and radiation. Int. J. Oncol., 15: 769773, 1999.21. Teicher, B. A., Ara, G., Buxton, D., Leonard, J., and Schaub, R. G. Optimal
scheduling of interleukin-12 and fractionated radiation therapy in the murine Lewis
lung carcinoma. Radiat. Oncol. Investig., 6: 7180, 1998.
22. Sigel, J., and Puri, R. Interleukin-2 toxicity. J. Clin. Oncol., 9: 694704, 1991.
23. Ryffel, B. Interleukin-12: role of interferon- in IL-12 adverse effects. Clin. Immu-
nol. Immunopathol., 83: 1820, 1997.
24. Zhang, R., Straus, F. H., and DeGroot, L. J. Effective genetic therapy of established
medullary thyroid carcinomas with murine interleukin-2: dissemination and cytotox-
icity studies in a rat tumor model. Endocrinology, 140: 21522158, 1999.
25. Goto, T., Nishi, T., Tamura, T., Dev, S. B., Takeshima, H., Kochi, M., Yoshizato, K.,
Kuratsu, J., Sakata, T., Hofmann, G. A., and Ushio, Y. Highly efficient electro-gene
therapy of solid tumor by using an expression plasmid for the herpes simplex virus
thymidine kinase gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97: 354359, 2000.
26. Heller, R., Jaroszeski, M., Atkin, A., Moradpour, D., Gilbert, R., Wands, J., and
Nicolau, C. In vivo gene electroinjection and expression in rat liver. FEBS Lett., 389:
225228, 1996.
27. Vicat, J. M., Boisseau, S., Jourdes, P., Laine, M., Wion, D., Bouali-Benazzouz, R.,
Benabid, A. L., and Berger, F. Muscle transfection by electroporation with high-voltage and short-pulse currents provides high-level and long-lasting gene expression.
Hum. Gene Ther., 11: 909916, 2000.
28. Miklavcic, D., Beravs, K., Semrov, D., Cemazar, M., Demsar, F., and Sersa, G. The
importance of electric field distribution for effective in vivo electroporation of tissues.
Biophys. J., 74: 21522158, 1998.
29. Gehl, J., Sorensen, T. H., Nielsen, K., Raskmark, P., Nielsen, S. L., Skovsgaard, T.,
and Mir, L. M. In vivo electroporation of skeletal muscle: threshold, efficacy and
relation to electric field distribution. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1428: 233240, 1999.
3284
TUMOR THERAPY WITH CYTOKINES AND ELECTROPORATION
on March 27, 2013. 2001 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.orgDownloaded from
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/