CSR- A Demand of Global Market - IJATTMAS Faridabad Volume III, Special Issue I April 2017 Page 96...
Transcript of CSR- A Demand of Global Market - IJATTMAS Faridabad Volume III, Special Issue I April 2017 Page 96...
IMT Faridabad Volume III, Special Issue I April 2017 Page 96
CSR- A Demand of Global Market
Dr. Geeta Shiromani*, Ms Meenu Dembla **
ABSTRACT:
Corporate Social Responsibility is emerging as a new field in the management research. But today
the word has become a part of people living in India. Initiating or executing CSR program, in present
scenario is mushrooming across the country’s landscape at a faster way among the industries.
The purpose of this study is to explore the role of FMCG companies towards corporate social
responsibility and its impact on the society as well as the impact of society on their business.
This paper will present a study of various conditions by examining the behavior of the parameters and
also suggests policy to determine ethical and CSR elements for each type of enterprise in the FMCG
sector in India.
This paper will also include a case study of Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. in which we will try to explore the
reasons of the wonderful growth in the last 5 years. The case tracks, how ethics and CSR worked in
the hyper competitive Indian FMCG sector, specially-
1. Home care products companies
2. Dairy products companies
3. Food and beverages companies
4. Cosmetics and health products companies.
5. Soft drinks and health drinks companies.
Keywords: Business – FMCG, Corporate Social Responsibility, Patanjali Ayurved, Global Standards,
========================================================================
*Associate Professor, [email protected]
Institute of Management & Technology, Faridabad
IMT Faridabad Volume III, Special Issue I April 2017 Page 97
An Introduction
Corporate Social Responsibility is emerging as a new field in the management research. But today the
word has become a part of people living in India. Initiating or executing CSR program, in present
scenario is mushrooming across the country’s landscape at a faster way among the industries.
The purpose of this study is to explore the role of FMCG companies towards corporate social
responsibility and its impact on the society as well as the impact of society on their business.
This paper will present a study of various conditions by examining the behavior of the parameters and
also suggests policy to determine ethical and CSR elements for each type of enterprise in the FMCG
sector in India.
This paper will also include a case study of Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. in which we will try to explore
the reasons of the wonderful growth in the last 5 years. The case tracks, how ethics and CSR worked
in the hyper competitive Indian FMCG sector, specially-
Home care products companies
Dairy products companies
Food and beverages companies
Cosmetics and health products companies.
Soft drinks and health drinks companies.
About FMCG or CPG
FMCG or CPG is known as “fast- moving consumer goods” or “consumer packed goods”. These are
quickly purchased, low margin of profit for retailers and fast consumable. FMCG engulfs those,
basically, household products which are less durable but purchased and consumed the most by
consumers. The most common in the list are toilet soaps, detergents, shampoos, toothpaste, shaving
products, shoe polish, packaged foodstuff, and household accessories and extends to certain electronic
goods. These items are meant for daily of frequent consumption and have a high return. Simply
speaking, these are the goods which we need and use every day in our life. We categorize these
products –
1. Home care products
2. Dairy products
IMT Faridabad Volume III, Special Issue I April 2017 Page 98
3. Food and beverages
4. Cosmetics and health products
5. Soft drinks and health drinks 1
6. Household accessories and certain electronic goods.
In FMCG industries there is a situation where in the retailers of FMCGs have low margin when it
comes to the sale of one single unit of product, however, because of the high level of demand for these
goods it ultimately gratifies the seller’s endeavor of getting the high range of profit as it sold in a large
volume. It is safe to say, that probably FMCG industries are the best example to illuminate the
situation “Low margin-high profit”.
About Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
In the words of Mallen Baker- “CSR is about how companies manage their business process to
produce an overall positive impact on society”.
Corporate Social Responsibility refers to the impact of initiative an activities taken by companies in
respect of welfare of the workforce (human resource), community living around (society).
In the earlier stage, the social responsibilities of a companies was inculcate just confined to proper
return of tax payable by the company established. However, CSR is now encompassing initiatives
taken in respect to welfare of the workers and their family as well as providing quality up to the
standard, rational pricing, contribution in women-children empowerment and awareness, steps for
providing an ideal environment to live in. Striving towards social welfare may or may not be lucrative
in terms of profitability to the firm but it’s company’s turn to pay back to the society for playing the
role of production factor by providing their work effort to the company and also by consuming the
goods and services as a customer that plays the most important role in profit as well as wealth
maximization.
CSR in India
CSR History India has a long rich history of close business involvement in social causes for national
development. In India, CSR is known from ancient time as social duty or charity, which through
IMT Faridabad Volume III, Special Issue I April 2017 Page 99
different ages is changing its nature in broader aspect, now generally known as CSR. From the origin
of business, which leads towards excess wealth, social and environmental issues have deep roots in the
history of business. India has had a long tradition of corporate philanthropy and industrial welfare has
been put to practice since late 1800s. Historically, the philanthropy of business people in India has
resembled western philanthropy in being rooted in religious belief. Business practices in the 1900s that
could be termed socially responsible took different forms: philanthropic donations to charity, service
to the community, enhancing employee welfare and promoting religious conduct. Corporations may
give funds to charitable or educational institutions and may argue for them as great humanitarian
deeds, when in fact they are simply trying to buy community good will. The ideology of CSR in the
1950s was primarily based on an assumption of the obligation of business to society. In initial years
there was little documentation of social responsibility initiatives in India. Since then there is a growing
realization towards contribution to social activities globally with a desire to improve the immediate
environment (Shinde, 2005). It has also been found that to a growing degree companies that pay
genuine attention to the principles of socially responsible behavior are also favored by the public and
preferred for their goods and services. This has given rise to the concept of CSR. After Independence,
JRD Tata who always laid a great deal of emphasis to go beyond conducting themselves as honest
citizens pointed out that there were many ways in which industrial and business enterprises can
contribute to public welfare beyond the scope of their normal activities. He advised that apart from the
obvious one of donating funds to good causes which has been their normal practice for years; they
could have used their own financial, managerial and human resourced to provide task forces for
undertaking direct relief and reconstruction measures. Slowly, it began to be accepted, at least in
theory that business had to share a part of the social overhead costs of. Traditionally, it had discharged
its responsibility to society through benefactions for education, medical facilities, and scientific
research among other objects. The important change at that time was that industry accepted social
responsibility Vol. 2, No. 1 Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal 46
as part of the management of the enterprise itself. The community development and social welfare
program of the premier Tata Company, Tata Iron and Steel Company was started the concepts of
“Social Responsibility.” (Gupta, 2007) The term corporate social performance was first coined by
Sethi (1975), expanded by Carroll (1979), and then refined by Wartick and Cochran (1985).
IMT Faridabad Volume III, Special Issue I April 2017 Page 100
In Sethi’s 1975 three-level model, the concept of corporate social performance was discussed, and
distinctions made between various corporate behaviors. Sethi’s three tiers were ‘social obligation (a
response to legal and market constraints); social responsibility (congruent with societal norms); and
social responsiveness (adaptive, anticipatory and preventive) (Cochran, 2007).
The last decade of the twentieth century witnessed a swing away from charity and traditional
philanthropy towards more direct engagement of business in mainstream development and concern for
disadvantaged groups in the society. This has been driven both internally by corporate will and
externally by increased governmental and public expectations (Mohan, 2001).
This was evident from a sample survey conducted in 1984 reporting that of the amount companies
spent on social development, the largest sum 47 percent was spent through company programs, 39
percent was given to outside organizations as aid and 14 percent was spent through company trusts
(Working Document of EU India CSR, 2001). In India as in the rest of the world there is a growing
realization that business cannot succeed in a society which fails. An ideal CSR has both ethical and
philosophical dimensions, particularly in India where there exists a wide gap between sections of
people in terms of income and standards as well as socio-economic status (Bajpai, 2001). According to
Infosys founder, Narayan Murthy, ‘social responsibility is to create maximum shareholders value
working under the circumstances, where it is fair to all its stakeholders, workers, consumers, the
community, government and the environment’. Commission of the European Communities 2001
stated that being socially responsible means not only fulfilling legal expectations, but also going
beyond compliance and investing ‘more’ into human capital, the environment and the relation with
stakeholders(Bajpai, 2001). Over the time four different models have emerged all of which can be
found in India regarding corporate responsibility (Kumar et al., 2001).
CSR needs to be understood within this context captured in the development oriented CSR framework
given below:
IMT Faridabad Volume III, Special Issue I April 2017 Page 101
Table 1: The four models of Corporate Responsibility (Arora & Puranik 2004)
Model Focus Champions
Ethical Voluntary commitment by companies to public welfare M.K Gandhi
Statist State ownership and legal requirements determine Corporate
responsibility
Jawahar Lal Nehru
Liberal Corporate responsibilities limited to private owners
(shareholders)
Milton Friedman
Stakeholder Companies respond to the needs of stakeholders customers,
employees, communities, etc.
R. Edward Freeman
So the concept of CSR is underpinned by the idea that corporations can no longer act as isolated
economic entities operating in detachment from broader society. Traditional views about
competitiveness, survival and profitability are being swept away.
DRIVERS TOWARDS CSR
Some of the drivers pushing business towards CSR include:
1. The shrinking role of government
In the past, governments have relied on legislation and regulation to deliver social and environmental
objectives in the business sector. Shrinking government resources, coupled with a distrust of
regulations, has led to the exploration of voluntary and non-regulatory initiatives instead.
2. Demands for greater disclosure
There is a growing demand for corporate disclosure from stakeholders, including customers, suppliers,
employees, communities, investors, and activist organizations.
3. Increased customer interest
There is evidence that the ethical conduct of companies exerts a growing influence on the purchasing
decisions of customers. In a recent survey by Environics International, more than one in five
consumers reported having either rewarded or punished companies based on their perceived social
performance.
4. Growing investor pressure
Investors are changing the way they assess companies' performance, and are making decisions based
on criteria that include ethical concerns. The Social Investment Forum reports that in the US in 1999,
IMT Faridabad Volume III, Special Issue I April 2017 Page 102
there was more than $2 trillion worth of assets invested in portfolios that used screens linked to the
environment and social responsibility. A separate survey by Environics International revealed that
more than a quarter of share-owning Americans took into account ethical considerations when buying
and selling stocks. (More on socially responsible investment can be found in the 'Banking and
investment' section of the site.)
5. Competitive labour markets
Employees are increasingly looking beyond paychecks and benefits, and seeking out employers whose
philosophies and operating practices match their own principles. In order to hire and retain skilled
employees, companies are being forced to improve working conditions.
6. Supplier relations
As stakeholders are becoming increasingly interested in business affairs, many companies are taking
steps to ensure that their partners conduct themselves in a socially responsible manner. Some are
introducing codes of conduct for their suppliers, to ensure that other companies' policies or practices
do not tarnish their reputation.
Positive Outcomes of CSR
Some of the positive outcomes that can arise when businesses adopt a policy of social responsibility
include:
1. Company benefits:
Improved financial performance;
Lower operating costs;
Enhanced brand image and reputation;
Increased sales and customer loyalty;
Greater productivity and quality;
More ability to attract and retain employees;
Reduced regulatory oversight;
Access to capital;
Workforce diversity;
Product safety and decreased liability.
IMT Faridabad Volume III, Special Issue I April 2017 Page 103
2. Benefits to the community and the general public:
Charitable contributions;
Employee volunteer programmes;
Corporate involvement in community education, employment and homelessness programmes;
Product safety and quality.
3. Environmental benefits:
Greater material recyclability;
Better product durability and functionality;
Greater use of renewable resources;
Integration of environmental management tools into business plans, including life-cycle
assessment and costing, environmental management standards, and eco-labelling.
Nevertheless, many companies continue to overlook CSR in the supply chain - for example by
importing and retailing timber that has been illegally harvested. While governments can impose
embargos and penalties on offending companies, the organizations themselves can make a
commitment to sustainability by being more discerning in their choice of suppliers.
The concept of corporate social responsibility is now firmly rooted on the global business agenda. But
in order to move from theory to concrete action, many obstacles need to be overcome.
A key challenge facing business is the need for more reliable indicators of progress in the field of
CSR, along with the dissemination of CSR strategies. Transparency and dialogue can help to make a
business appear more trustworthy, and push up the standards of other organizations at the same time.
A Case Analysis of CSR Activities of Patanjali Group-
Patanjali started its operations with Patanjali yogpeeth in Hardiwar, Uttarakhand. Patanjali yogpeeth is
one of the largest yoga institutes in the country. Swami Ramdevji Maharaj and Acharya Balkrishanaji
Maharaj set up Patanjali Ayurveda Pvt Ltd for treatment, research and development and for the
manufacturing of ayurvedic medicines in Yoga and Ayurveda.
Patanjali Yogpeeth offers treatment and scientific research and has brought a revolution when it comes
healthcare in the country with the combined approach of Yoga and Ayurveda.
IMT Faridabad Volume III, Special Issue I April 2017 Page 104
The infrastructural facilities at Patanjali Yogpeeth includes an OPD for free medical consultation, IPD
of thousand beds, laboratory for test investigation of radiology, cardiology and pathology, a yoga
research department, free yoga classes, high quality ayurvedic medicines manufactured by Divya
pharmacy, facilities of library and reading room along with a cyber café, a huge auditorium,
apartments for senior citizens, a grand museum and a sale outlet of 11,000 square feet for literature
related to yoga and Ayurveda.
Patanjali Ayurveda- Entry into FMCG
Patanjali started off manufacturing bulk Ayurvedic medicines later branching its operations into
FMCG markets as well. Since, the FMCG market has low entry barriers, Patanjali soon established
itself as a major consumer goods’ manufacturer. The recent trends clearly imply that the company’s
priorities are shifting from medicines to consumer goods, perhaps because the net revenues earned
through FMCG are on par with ayurvedic medicines.
Patanjali Ayurveda – Current Market Insights
Patanjali as a brand currently has more than 350 products from Soap to Toothpaste and from Oats to
Health drinks. The 2014-2015 revenue of Patanjali Ayurveda crosses Rs. 2000 crore figures. In
January 2016, IIFL said “Patanjali Ayurveda Ltd has, in a short span of less than a decade, recorded a
turnover higher than what several companies have managed to achieve over several decades. There is
no doubt that Patanjali is a disruptive force in the FMCG space and is a credible threat for the
incumbents.” The industrial data indicates that the brand has a market share of 4-5% Patanjali Sales
(2012-2016)
Graph 2: Growth of Revenue and Net Profit of Patanjali 2
IMT Faridabad Volume III, Special Issue I April 2017 Page 105
Graph 3: Total Income Composition
Focus on Revenue over Profitability
As per the report by research “The company is well on course to achieve its targeted revenue of -
INR50‐60bn in FY16 (INR20.2bn in FY15). Even though the thrust is not on profitability, the
company managed to clock ~20% EBITDA margin in FY15, aided by better cost management (latest
machinery and strong R&D capabilities) and lower A&P spends”
Proactive moves in Innovation
Patanjali Ayurveda is aggressively planning to enter into every consumer category. Currently Patanjali
Ghee is expected to be at INR 12 billion in the financial year 2016 and if it gains solid distribution
expertise, it could pose a serious threat to its competitors. An innovative R&D facility equipped with
latest technology, Patanjali has also launched a mobile app which helps the consumer to locate retail
outlets and for online ordering of Patanjali products
IMT Faridabad Volume III, Special Issue I April 2017 Page 106
PRODUCT BASKET: PATANJALI GROUP
Product Group Product Items
1.Grocery and Staples Pulse, Flour, Staples, Edible Oil & Ghee.
2.Ready food Confectionary, Snacks and breakfast, Sauces and Pickles &
Sweets etc.
3. Personal Care Face care,Body care, Hair care, Oral care, Makeup, Soaps &
Hand wash, Shaving & Grooming etc.
4. Health Care Health drinks, Chawanprash, Nutrition & Supplements &
Digestives
5. Households Cleaning & Washing
6.Beverages Juice & Fruit Drinks, Sharbat & Squash
Patanjali’s Pipeline
Patanjali has a very strong pipeline, thanks to their innovative and huge R&D setup.
The new products include:
Patanjali yoga wear (Vastram)
Dant Kanti Advance
Sugar free Chyawanprash
Power Vita
Sea buck thorn dietary supplement
Pricing of Patanjali Products v/s Its Competitors
Product Name Quantity Patanjali
Price(Rs)
Competitor’s
Price
Competitor
1. Cow Ghee 1ltr 450 710 Parsi Dairy
2. Saundarya Creams 60gm 60 80 Pears Face Wash
3.Honey 500gm 135 199 Dabur Honey
4.Kesh Kanti Shampoo 200gm 110 159 Head&Shoulder
IMT Faridabad Volume III, Special Issue I April 2017 Page 107
5.KantiNeem Soap 75gm 15 24 Himalaya Neem
Soap
6.Super Dish Wash
Bar
175gm 10 15 Vim Dish War
7.Corn Flakes Mix 500gm 145 182 Kelloggs Corn
Flakes
8.Detergent Powder 250gm 13 19 Rin Detergent
Powder
9.Pineapple Juice 1ltr 85 99 Dabur Real Juice
10.Special Chyawan
Prash
500gm 115 160 Dabur
Chyawanprash
SWOT Analysis of Patanjali
Strength
Spiritual connect with the consumer en masse.
Herbal products with natural ingredients
Strong and Innovative R&D
Baba Ramdev – face of the brand
Weakness
Controversies like noodles not approved by FSSAI at the time of launching
Products like putrajeewak which creates negative impact on the brand
Strong competitors and low exports
Opportunity
There is a large domestic market for FMCG Products
Low entry barrier for new and innovative herbal products
Threats
Competitors keeping a close eye on the growth of Patanjali Ayurveda
Controversies around the Patanjali group
Weak supply chain as compared to the competitors.
IMT Faridabad Volume III, Special Issue I April 2017 Page 108
Patanjali CSR Objective
The Company firmly believes that CSR is primarily, the responsibility of the Company in relation to
the impact of its decisions and activities on the society and also the Environment, through a
transparent and ethical behavior which is:
(a) Consistent with sustainable development and welfare of Society,
(b) Takes into account the expectations of stakeholders,
(c) Is in compliance with applicable law
Patanjali Group’s CSR Scopes
Eradicating hunger, poverty and malnutrition, promoting preventive health care and sanitation and
making available safe drinking water;
Promoting education, including special education and employment enhancing vocation skills
especially among children, women, elderly, and the differently abled and livelihood enhancement
projects;
Promoting gender equality, empowering women, setting up homes and hostels for women and
orphans; setting up old age homes, day care centers and such other facilities for senior citizens and
measures for reducing inequalities faced by socially and economically backward groups;
Enduring environmental sustainability, ecological balance, protection of flora and fauna, animal
welfare, agro forestry, conservation of natural resources and maintaining quality of soil, air and water;
Protection of national heritage, art and culture including restoration of buildings and sites of
historical importance and works of art; setting up public libraries; promotion and development of
traditional arts and handicrafts;
Measures for the benefit of armed forces veterans, war widows and their dependents;
Training to promote rural sports, nationally recognized sports, Paralympics sports and Olympic
sports;
Contributions to the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund or any other fund set up by the Central
Government for socio-economic development and relief and welfare of the Scheduled Castes, the
Scheduled Tribes, other backward classed, minorities and women;
Contribution or funds provided to technology incubators located within academic institutions
which are approved by the Central Government;
IMT Faridabad Volume III, Special Issue I April 2017 Page 109
Rural development projects and
Any other activity as may be prescribed by the Central Government from time to time.
CSR Activities:
1. Acharyakulam
2. Kushthrogi
3. Research and development
4. Patanjali Gramodyog
5. Patanjali Food Research
Focus Area:
1. Modern Education through Gurukul System
For Girl Child
For Poor Students
2. Healthcare
Ayurved Facilities
Research and Development
Patanjali & CSR: Sustainability
To support Patanjali production is a promising policy for increasing sustainability in the economy,
which would affect both customer attitude and purchase intention. Patanjali Ayurved assists in
environmental protection, health, animal welfare, biodiversity preservation, natural resource
conservation, food safety etc. Many scholars acknowledged that all these sustainability issues
somehow motivate customers to purchase and recommend of. This means that the majority of
customers are aware of the gains of sustainability and due to this, have a positive attitude towards off,
but do not prefer to purchase natural foodstuffs regularly. Based on the above arguments, the
hypotheses framed are these:
H1.
Sustainability is positively associated with customer attitude.
IMT Faridabad Volume III, Special Issue I April 2017 Page 110
H2.
Sustainability is positively but less associated with purchase intentions.
Sustainability has three pillars:
1. Social Impact -(Market impact, Product Impact & Brand Impact)
2. Environment Impact -(Industry, Client,& Suppliers)
3. Economic Impact -(Governance, Compliance & Transformation)
Demographic and socioeconomic environment
Demographic and socioeconomic variables are key metrics, which predict buying behaviour of
consumers in a particular place or region, education level has a significant impact on consumption
level. Similarly, in the context of age and gender-companies need to evaluate the demographic and
socioeconomic environment to attain paramount business performance. Although young people are
more conscious about ecological issues, they have less of a willingness to pay for of because of their
lower purchasing power, while older people are more health-conscious and have a higher willingness
to pay the extra cost. Additionally, cultural differences lead customers to perceive different values at
the time of purchases. However, in the literature, there is an ongoing debate on the importance of
ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT
SUSTAINABILITY
SOCIAL IMPACT
ECONOMIC
IMPACT
Market
Produc
t
Brand
Client Industr
y
Supplie
rs
Transformatio
n Complianc
e Governanc
e
IMT Faridabad Volume III, Special Issue I April 2017 Page 111
demographic and socioeconomic indicators in of consumption. Thus we expect the demographic and
socioeconomic variables to affect attitude and intentions. Hence, we proposed the following
hypotheses:
H3: Demographic and socioeconomic factors have an effect on Patanjali Products customer attitude
H4: Demographic and socioeconomic factors have an effect on Patanjali Products purchase intentions.
Attitude
Attitude predicts customer's purchase intentions.
Consumers have a positive attitude towards purchasing of because of its better taste, health benefits
and environment-friendly nature .but also that its premium price, lesser variety and scarcity restrict
consumer attitude and not allow them to purchase these products.
So there is a gap between attitude and actual buying behavior of Patanjali product consumers.
Considering the above viewpoints, we contemplated the following hypothesis:
H5: Customer attitude has positive effect but one less associated with organic food purchase
intentions.
On the basis of these Pillars & Hypothesis -Our questionnaire is based on –
1. People – Consumers
2. Planet- Ethical Values & Morality
3. Profit- Business profit and social welfare
For testing hypothesis We have collected primary data by sending questionnaire to 300 people
(Including – costumers, distributer, employees and others) & got respond about 247 respondents. In
this questionnaire – we used 3 parameters for exploring information for testing given hypothesis.
H1.
Sustainability is positively associated with customer attitude.
H2.
Sustainability is positively but less associated with purchase intentions.
Result-After observing the sample results we find that the first null hypothesis is true but the second hypothesis
is rejected. For studying such hypothesis we have used a comparative price list of Patanjali Products and
IMT Faridabad Volume III, Special Issue I April 2017 Page 112
competitive company’s products & find that customer’s positive attitude is not a result of quality of the products
but also the price of the products in comparison of other products.
H3: Demographic and socioeconomic factors have an effect on Patanjali Products customer attitude.
Most of the costumer’s attitude towards patanjali products is very positive, because they are attached
with this group by heart due to its swadeshi movement & impact of CSR activities.
H4: Demographic and socioeconomic factors have an effect on Patanjali Products purchase intentions.
The result shows that this hypothesis is also come true; socio and economic factors also affect the purchasing
intentions of the Indian costumers.
H5: Customer attitude has positive effect but one less associated with organic food purchase
intentions.
The result shows that this hypothesis is somehow rejected but on the other hands it is accepted by
some rich customers, because organic foods are very costly so poor & middle class people are not able
to purchase these products although they have very positive attitude towards patanjali product.
Conclusion
Patanjali successfully infused western products with the ‘Desi’ branding to gain the trust of the
audience who were looking for a reason to despise necessary but expensive foreign brands.
The quality of the Patanjali Ayurved products is a debatable matter relating with controversies they
found for themselves; First FSSAI license fiasco followed by the future expiry date labels on the
Patanjali products. But with the robust pipeline of new products ready to join the plethora of Patanjali
Ayurved products already selling in Indian malls and bazaars, they are ready to give a plenty of
reasons to worry to global FMCG brands in India.
So The Patanjali Ayurved is currently winning the capitalist race with Nationalism.
IMT Faridabad Volume III, Special Issue I April 2017 Page 113
References:
Adkins, S. (1999), Cause Related Marketing-Who cares Wins, Butterworth-
Heinemann, Oxford, page 9-10, 48-49.
Andriof and McIntosch (2001), Perspectives on corporate citizenship, Greenleaf
Publishing.
Arora, B. (2004): India and Corporate Social Responsibility: An Explorative
Review, Nottingham: International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility,
University Business School.
Arora, B. / R. Puranik (2004): A Review of Corporate Social Responsibility in
India, in: Development: Journal of the Society for International Development, 47
(3), 93–100.
Carroll, A. B. (1983). Corporate social responsibility: Will industry respond to
cut-backs in social program funding? Vital Speeches of the Day, 49, p. 604-608.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Towards
the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34,
(4), 39-48.
Jenkins, H. 2004: A Critique of Conventional CSR Theory: An SME Perspective.
Journal of General Management, 29, 4, pp. 37-57.
Jenkins, Heledd (2006): ‘Small Business Champions for Corporate Social
Responsibility’ in: Journal of Business Ethics, 67: 241-256.
Joseph W. Weiss, Business Ethics 4th Ed., A stakeholder and Issue Management
Approach, Thomson South-western, 2006, Canada.
IMT Faridabad Volume III, Special Issue I April 2017 Page 114
Vives, A. 2006: Social and Environmental Responsibility in Small and Medium
Enterprises in Latin America. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Spring, pp. 39-
50.
Vyakarnam, S. – Bailey, A. – Myers, A. – Burett, D. 1997: Towards an
Understanding of Ethical Behaviur in Small Firms. Journal of Business Ethics,
16, pp. 125-136.
William B. Werther, JR & David Chandler, 2006, Strategic corporate social
responsibility shareholders in a global environment, Sage Publications, Inc.