Container terminal industry: weathering the storm · 6/7/2018 · 3,326 3,232 3,490 3,903 4,203...
Transcript of Container terminal industry: weathering the storm · 6/7/2018 · 3,326 3,232 3,490 3,903 4,203...
www.drewry.co.uk
Container terminal industry:
weathering the stormMaritime Silk Road, Ningbo
13th June, 2018
www.drewry.co.uk2
Enter presentation title, client or document name in Slide Master
Content
• The storm
• Weathering the storm
• Strategies
www.drewry.co.uk
The Storm
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Mill
ion
TEU
North America Europe Asia Middle East & ISC Latin America Africa Oceania
Global container trade: slower growthThe global container trade has grown at a CAGR of 4.5% between 2010 – 2017, down from
CAGR 8.3% 2000-09.
Global Container Trade: Global Port Handling
North America
9%
Others91%
Europe17%
Others83% Asia
54%
Others46%
Middle East &
ISC9%
Others91%
Latin America
6%
Others94%
Africa4%
Others96% Oceania
2%
others98%
Global Container Trade: 2017 % TEU Share and CAGRs
CAGR 00 – 09: 3.2% CAGR 10 – 17:
3.8%
CAGR 00 – 09: 7.3% CAGR 10 – 17:
3.2%
CAGR 00 – 09: 5.9% CAGR 10 – 17:
3.4%
CAGR 00 – 09: 10% CAGR 10 – 17:
5.1%
CAGR 00 – 09: 12.4% CAGR 10 – 17:
5.2%
CAGR 00 – 09: 6.6% CAGR 10 – 17:
3.8%CAGR 00 – 09:
10.7% CAGR 10 – 17: 4.9%
CAGR 00 – 09: 8.3% CAGR 10 – 17:
4.5%
Source: Drewry
Concentrating customer base
2017
Hapag-
LloydUASC
HL merges
with UASC
MOL NYK K-Line
Ocean
Network
Express
2018 (Container Operations Only)
MaerskHamburg-
Sud
Maersk
acquires
Hamburg
Sud
2016
CMA-CGM APL
CMA-CGM
acquires
APL
COSCO CSCL
COSCO
merges
with CSCL
OOCL
2017
2M
Ocean
THE
Containership sizes double on most trades
• · ·
Evolution of average ship sizes on major trade routes
Source : Drewry Maritime Research
Source : Drewry Maritime Research
Trade Route (TEU) 1Q09 1Q12 1Q15 1Q18
Far East/N Europe 7,779 9,552 12,235 15,291
Far East/Mediterranean (direct) 5,488 6,848 8,625 10,998
Transpacific headhaul 5,079 5,869 6,740 7,828
Transatlantic headhaul 3,609 3,872 4,458 4,703
ECSA/Far East 5,074 3,240 8,314 9,236
WCSA/F East 5,100 2,681 7,207 7,751
Eur/S Africa 3,301 3,116 7,657 8,096
Far East/S Africa (direct) 5,255 3,651 7,061 5,068
Eur/W Africa (direct) 1,965 1,636 2,578 2,965
Far East/W Africa (Direct) 2,755 2,220 4,846 5,490
Asia/Mid-East and South Asia (direct)
2,926 3,692 5,594 5,409
Capex is rising to accommodate larger vessels
• More cranes
• Larger cranes (outreach and height)
• Longer and deeper berths
• Deeper approach channels
• Greater air draft
• Larger or more densely stacked yard
Larger ships drive up opex
10,000 moves per week
4 x 7,500 TEU vessel calls
10,000 moves per week
2 x 15,000 TEU vessel calls
QC x 6
22 rows
48m high
QC x 4
18 rows
38m high330m quay
14m depth
400m quay
16m depth
5,000 moves
per call2,500 moves
per call
Larger
yard to
handle
peak
loads
Higher peak
manning
The Storm
Softening of demand
growth rates
Vessel upsizing: cost
pressure
Concentration of volume: risk
Weak carrier profitability: pressure on
price
Pressure on margins
and returns
www.drewry.co.uk
Weathering the storm
Weathering the storm
Softening of demand
growth rates
Higher opexand capex
costs due to bigger ships
Increased business risks from larger liner alliances
Carriers pressuring for lower
prices
Global demand growth has recovered from stagnation in 2016
to growth of over 6% in 2017
Prices appear to be holding firm for several reasons
Cost saving initiatives have enabled many terminal
operators to mitigate upward opex pressures
Weathering the stormConcentration increases risk
Change in market share: SE Asian transhipment hubs, 2004-17
-5%
-4%
-3%
-2%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Singapore Port Klang Tanjung Pelepas
Weathering the stormConcentration increases risk
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
55.0%
60.0%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Antwerp and Rotterdam volume share (%)
Antwerp Rotterdam Linear (Antwerp) Linear (Rotterdam)
Industry EBITDA and EBITDA Margins¹
2,802
2,364
2,741 3,326 3,232
3,490
3,903 4,203
4,646
5,145
37.7% 37.5%
39.0%
43.8%
39.9%
41.2%41.7%
43.4%
44.8% 44.9%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
0
1,500
3,000
4,500
6,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
(US
D m
illio
n)
EBITDA EBITDA Margin
Weathering the stormEBITDA margins sustained
EBITDA Growth (%)
Source: Bloomberg, DMFR
Note: (1) Includes Cosco Shipping Ports, CMPH, DP World, ICTSI and HHLA
na -15.6 15.9 21.3 -2.8 8.0 11.9 7.7 10.5 10.7
Weathering the stormReturns going down
Sample Port Operators: Return On Invested Capital (ROIC), 2008-17
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
11%
12%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Average
Average exc APMT
Linear (Average)
Linear (Average exc APMT)
50.0
70.0
90.0
110.0
130.0
150.0
170.0
Apr-13 Nov-13 Jun-14 Dec-14 Jul-15 Jan-16 Aug-16 Feb-17 Sep-17 Apr-18
Inde
xed t
o 1
00
Chinese Terminal Operators - International Exposure Terminal Operators - Emerging Market Exposure
Single Location Terminal Operator - Mature Mkt Exposure
Weathering the storm
Note: (1) Chinese Multi-location Terminal Operators includes Cosco and CMPH; Multi-location Terminal Operators – Emerging Mkt Exposure include DPW and ICTSI; Single Location
Terminal Operator – Mature Mkt Exposure include HHLA
(24.8%)
12.5%
9.1%
5 year share price development
Share prices peaked in the third quarter of 2017; have declined substantially since
Weathering the storm
Still afloat
• Growth better than feared
• Margins sustained: rates and opex managed for now
• Returns down
• Concentration of carrier market remains a key risk:
‒ Volume and share volatility
‒ Price pressure
www.drewry.co.uk
Strategies
Strategies
Liner affiliation
• Hybrid category terminal operators are increasing in prominence
• More JV agreements for terminals between non-liner affiliated terminal operators and shipping lines
• Affiliated lines try to steer volume to owned terminals
• Alliance politics is complex
Consolidation and port and terminal alliances
• Alliances between ports
• Focus on filling existing capacity rather than building new terminals
• Terminal operator M&A/consolidation
• Creation of terminal alliances within ports
• Diversification by terminal operators
Port authorities
• Avoid beggar my neighbour competition
• Ensure true cost of accommodating ULCVs is met by the lines
• Getting closer to end users
• Catalysing hinterland connectivity
Ports and terminal industry needs to balance market power of large alliances.
Port authorities need to ensure true costs of ULCVs are met by lines
www.drewry.co.uk
CHINA
Unit D01, Level 10,
Shinmay Union Square
Tower 2, 506 Shangcheng Rd
Pudong District, Shanghai
China, 200120
T +86 21 5081 0508
SINGAPORE
#13-02 Tower Fifteen
15 Hoe Chiang Road
Singapore 089316
T +65 6220 9890
UNITED KINGDOM
15-17 Christopher Street
London
EC2A 2BS
United Kingdom
T +44 20 7538 0191
INDIA
4th Floor, Tower C
Pioneer Urban Square
Sector 62, Gurugram
122102 India
T +91 124 497 4979
The primary source of market insight, analysis and
advice trusted by the global shipping industry.
Robust, objective market analysis and
forecasts to inform business decisions
Bringing together the expertise, insight
and resources clients need to achieve
their commercial ambitions
Tools, resources and tailored advice
to support every stage of the ocean
freight procurement process
A truly independent investment
research and advisory service
on companies operating within
the maritime industry
Market Sectors
Container Shipping
Ports and Terminals
Dry Bulk
Gas Shipping
Tanker Shipping
Specialised Shipping
Ship Management
Logistics Management
Intermodal Transport
Advisory Expertise
Market Analysis
Strategy and Planning
Market Entry Analysis
Operational Due Diligence
Technical Due Diligence
IPO Support
Advisory Expertise
Ocean Freight Cost Benchmarking
Ocean Freight Procurement Support
Network Design and Optimisation
Commercial Due Diligence
Hinterland Logistics Analysis
Market Sectors
Container Shipping
Container Manufacturing
Ports and Terminals
Dry Bulk
Gas Shipping
Tanker Shipping
Advisory Expertise
Credit Analysis
Bond Analysis