Pioneering CSR - an analysis of Danish frontrunners ind Corporate ...
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE · INTRODUCTION To be considered for the Construction...
Transcript of CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE · INTRODUCTION To be considered for the Construction...
Powered by Methodology
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE
JULY 2018
2
C O N T E N T S
Introduction
Defining Construction PM Software
FrontRunners (Small Vendors)
FrontRunners (Enterprise Vendors)
Runners Up
Methodology Basics
3
5
6
8
10
14
3
This FrontRunners analysis is a data-driven assessment
identifying products in the Construction Project Management software market that offer the best capability and value for small businesses. For a given market, products are evaluated and given a score for Usability (x-axis) and User Recommendations (y-axis). FrontRunners then plots 10-15 products each on a Small Vendor and an Enterprise Vendor graphic, based on vendor business size, per category.
In the Construction Project Management FrontRunners
infographic, the enterprise vendor graphic had a minimum qualifying score of 3.90 for Usability and 3.92 for User Recommended, while the small vendor graphic had a minimum qualifying score of 3.54 for Usability and 3.85 for User Recommended.
To be considered for the Construction Project Management FrontRunners, a product needed a minimum of 20 user reviews published within 18 months of the evaluation period. Products needed a minimum user rating score of 3.0 for both usability and user recommended in both the Small and Enterprise graphics.
I N T R O D U C T I O N
4
INTRODUCTION
To be considered for the Construction Project Management FrontRunners, a product needed a minimum of 20 user reviews published within 18 months of the evaluation period. Products needed a minimum user rating score of 3.0 for both Usability and User Recommended in both the Small and Enterprise graphics.
The minimum score cutoff to be included in the FrontRunners graphic varies by category, depending on the range of scores in each category. No product with a score less than 3.0 in either dimension is included in any FrontRunners graphic. For products included, the Usability and User Recommended scores determine their positions on the FrontRunners graphic.
5
Construction Project Management software helps
construction companies schedule projects, coordinate teams and track project progress to completion so firms can maximize the number of projects they deliver on time and on budget. These tools are used to allocate resources and equipment, centralize documentation, manage change orders and monitor job costs against the budget.
Software Advice’s FrontRunners quadrant is focused on the North
American Construction Project Management software market. We identify this set of core capabilities for the Construction Project Management category: project scheduling, project tracking, document management/control and job costing, as well as at least two of the following: change orders, punch lists, purchase orders, RFI and submittals, transmittals and/or building information modeling (BIM).
D E F I N I N G C O N S T R U C T I O N P M S O F T WA R E
6
For each individual rating in both the Usability and User Recommended criteria, the methodology
weighs recent reviews more heavily.
US
ER
RE
CO
MM
EN
DE
D
4.83.7
4.8
3.7
USABILITY
UDA ConstructionOnlineJOBPROGRESS
eSub
CoConstructRoots Software
Knowify
JobNimbusJonas Premier
UDAConstructionSuite
UniPhi RedTeam
GenieBeltComputerEase
WorkflowMax
AccuBuild
F R O N T R U N N E R S ( S M A L L V E N D O R S )
FRONTRUNNERS® FOR CONSTRUCTION PM, JULY 2018
7
F R O N T R U N N E R S S C O R E S
( S M A L L V E N D O R S )
TOTAL SCORE
USABILITY SCORE
USER RECOMMENDED
SCORE
1 eSUB 9.31 4.73 4.59
2 Roots Software 9.29 4.55 4.74
3 CoConstruct 9.19 4.49 4.70
4 Knowify 8.99 4.41 4.57
5 JobNimbus 8.74 4.35 4.40
6 Jonas Premier 8.67 4.28 4.40
7 JOBPROGRESS 8.64 4.28 4.36
8 UDA ConstructionSuite 8.54 4.21 4.33
9 RedTeam 8.47 4.11 4.36
10 UDA ConstructionOnline 8.45 4.10 4.34
11 UniPhi 8.42 4.08 4.35
12 GenieBelt 8.04 4.19 3.85
13 ComputerEase 7.77 3.89 3.88
14 WorkflowMax 7.77 3.84 3.93
15 AccuBuild 7.62 3.75 3.87
8
For each individual rating in both the Usability and User Recommended criteria, the methodology
weighs recent reviews more heavily.
US
ER
RE
CO
MM
EN
DE
D
4.83.7
4.8
3.7
USABILITY
FOUNDATION
ProcoreAconex
Buildertrende-Builder
CMiC
Spectrum
Vista by Viewpoint
BIM 360 Sage 300 Construction and Real Estate
Sage 100 Contractor
F R O N T R U N N E R S ( E N T E R P R I S E V E N D O R S )
FRONTRUNNERS® FOR CONSTRUCTION PM, JULY 2018
9
F R O N T R U N N E R S S C O R E S
( E N T E R P R I S E V E N D O R S )
TOTAL SCORE
USABILITY SCORE
USER RECOMMENDED
SCORE
1 Procore 8.68 4.41 4.27
2 Aconex 8.58 4.32 4.26
3 Buildertrend 8.57 4.28 4.29
4 e-Builder 8.51 4.23 4.28
5 CMiC 8.51 4.21 4.30
6 Spectrum 8.28 4.14 4.13
7 Sage 100 Contractor 7.94 3.93 4.01
8 Vista by Viewpoint 7.92 3.93 3.99
9 Sage 300 Construction and Real Estate 7.89 3.95 3.93
10 BIM 360 7.87 3.93 3.94
11 FOUNDATION 7.86 3.91 3.95
10
R U N N E R S U P
4castplus
Acculynx
Adjutant
Aimsio
APROPLAN
Archdesk
ARES PRISM
AroFlo
Assemble Insight
Aurigo Masterworks
AutoCAD
B2W SCHEDULE
B2W Track
BEAMS Software
Bidtracer
Bizns Tool
Bluebeam Revu
Bridgit
Builder 360
Builder Information System
Builder Prime
BuilderStorm
BuildIT
BuildPro
BuildSafe
Buildshop
BuildSmart
BuildTools
Candy by CCS
CATCloud suite
Clear Estimates
ClockShark
Cloud EPC
CM Fusion
COINS Global
Computer Guidance
11
Construction Partner
Construction Report Manager
Contractor Estimate Pro
Contractor Foreman
Contractor’s Cloud
Contractor’s Office
Corecon
Coreworx
Dalux Field
Dataforma
DrawingView
EADOC
EJM Construction
Estimator360
eTrack
Explorer Eclipse
FacilityONE
FCS Control
FieldCollaborate
FieldLens
Fieldly
Fieldwire
FINALCAD
Fluid Contract Manager
Gantter
HCSS HeavyJob
HoloBuilder
HomeFront Software
infinitrac
Infor Construction
iSqFt Takeoff
Job4Site
JOBPOWER
Jonas Construction Software
Key2Act
Latista
Maestro ERP
MagiTech
Manage-IT
Mark Systems
My Project Estimator
Neanex
Newforma Solutions
Orbis Pro
12
OROCON Solutions
Pacific Timesheet
Pantera Project Insight
PASconcept
Paskr
PCS by PCS Solutions
Penta Solutions
PlanGrid
PMWeb
Primavera
Priority Matrix
Pro DBX
PROcru
Profitool
Project DocControl
Project Drive
Projectmates
projectteam
Proliance
Prolog
RADAR
RAKEN
Reflex ERP
Revizto
RooferPro
Sage Construction Project Center
SAM - Superintendent’s Automated Manager
Site2Site
SiteDiary
Sitefotos
SiteMax
Smart Contractor
Smart Service
SmartUse Suite
Spitfire Project Management System
STACK
STRUCTURE
Synergy
Tenderfield
Total Service Enterprise
Tradesoft
Traqspera
Twenty20 Construction Cloud
13
Ventus
Vico Office Suite
Viewpoint For Projects
VirtualBoss
Visual Planning
VPO
14
The FrontRunners methodology assesses and calculates a
score for products on two primary dimensions: Usability on the x-axis and User Recommended on the y-axis.
The Usability score is a weighted average of user ratings including:
• End-user ratings of one to five stars on the product’s ease of use.
• End-user ratings of one to five stars on the product’s functionality.
The User Recommended score is an overall weighted average of scores including:
• End-user ratings of one to five stars on how valuable users consider the product to be relative to its price.
• End-user ratings of one to five stars on how likely they are to recommend the product to others.
There are up to two FrontRunners graphics for each market, one Small Vendors and one Enterprise Vendors graphic. The Small Vendors graphic highlights qualifiers from smaller (by employee size) vendors, while the Enterprise Vendors graphic displays qualifiers for larger (by employee size) vendors.
M E T H O D O L O GY B A S I C S
15
METHODOLOGY BASICS
Markets are defined by a core set of functionality, and to be eligible for FrontRunners, products must offer that core set of functionality. Core functionality required is determined by our research analysts, who provide coverage for and have familiarity with products in that market. Additionally, a product must have at least 20 unique user-submitted product reviews across the three Gartner Digital Markets web properties: softwareadvice.com, capterra.com and getapp.com, which have been published within 18 months of the start of the analysis period.
Inclusion in the Small Vendor or Enterprise Vendor FrontRunners graphics is based on the vendor’s employee count. Vendors eligible for the Enterprise Vendor graphic must have more than the median employee count for all vendors in the market, or 100 employees—whichever is greater. Vendors whose employee counts do not meet either of those thresholds qualify for the Small Vendor graphic.
1 In the event fewer than 10 products qualify for either a Small Vendors or Enterprise Vendors FrontRunners graphic, the vendors that do qualify will be combined into a single graphic.