COMPILATION OF ADDITIONAL PERMANGANATE … · Mr. Randy Smith Jun 14 200, 1 e American Environmenta...

IT Corporation 100 River Ridge Drive Norwood, MA 02062-5045 Tel. 781.769.7600 FJX. 781.769.7992

A Member of The IT Group

June 14, 2001 Project: 102589-200102

U

Mr. Randy Smith American Environmental Consultants P.O. Box 310 Mont Vernon, New Hampshire 03057

Subject: Compilation of Additional Permanganate Information Collected During Q29 Revision 1 Former Union Chemical Superfund Site Hope, Maine

Dear Randy:

Attached is the summarization of the data collected during the Q29 sampling (April 2001) for the wells exhibiting the presence of unreacted permanganate (as evidenced by the characteristic color, either prior to, or during, purging). This summarization includes:

• ASummaryofSite Activities,

• Field Notes collected during the Low Flow Sampling (Appendix A),

• Report of colorimetry analysis performed onsite by Carus Chemical Company's Chemist (Appendix B),

• Tabulation of the field gas chromatograph results as provided by the US EPA's mobile laboratory (Appendix C), and

• Copies of the laboratory VOC analyses (Appendix D) for the tabulated wells.

Table 1 (attached) summarizes additional field information of the wells containing residual permanganate. This information is being provided to the copy distribution list for additional review and comment.

Site Activities

As part of the Q29 activities, all wells at the site were gauged on April 29, 2001. Bailers were used at each well to confirm the presence or absence of unreacted permanganate in each well. A list of 11 wells containing residual permanganate was compiled along with an indication of the degree of coloration. This list of wells was provided to all parties via a fax memorandum dated April 30, 2001. In a follow-up teleconference on April 30, 2001, IT Corporation agreed to sample seven of these wells utilizing the expanded preservation protocol (ice, hydrochloric acid, and sodium thiosulfate). Of these

P \Union Chernical\Maine\Final01\Correspondence\Cornpil of Addi Parmang revl doc

IT Corporation A Member of The IT Group

seven wells, five were part of the overall Q29 sample set, with the other two added (P-13 and P-22). Since the other four wells with residual permanganate have not been part of the regular site monitoring program (OW-1-1D, OW-3-1L, OW-3-1D, and OW-3-2M), it was agreed not to include them in the Q29 sampling event since there would not be any relevant prior data to compare the results to.

On April 30 and May 1, 2001, in the course of groundwater purging from the wells for the Q29 event, purge water from B-6A(D) and B-12C(S) was found to turn from clear to a slight purple tint. These two wells were then added to the expanded preservation protocol sampling list. All nine samples selected for expanded preservation were collected on April 30 and May 1, 2001.

In addition to the samples collected for the expanded preservation protocol, supplementary samples were collected from the wells with residual permanganate and analyzed for permanganate concentrations by a colorimetric method. Colorimetric samples were collected from the initial eleven wells revealing residual permanganate, plus the two wells revealing unreacted permanganate following purging (B-6A(D) and B12C(S)). Up to two colorimetric samples were collected from each of the 13 wells with permanganate. The first colorimetric sample was collected by a bailer prior to the low-flow purging. The second colorimetric sample was collected at the end of the low-flow purging. Because B-6A(D) and B-12C(S) did not have visible concentrations of permanganate prior to the low-flow purging, initial colorimetric samples were not collected. Additionally, since wells OW-1-1D, OW-3-1L, OW-3-1D, and OW-3-2M were not included in the Q29 sampling, only grab samples were collected without any purging.

Field samples were collected using low flow sampling protocol and three sample aliquots were obtained and preserved using three means of preservation:

• no preservative (ice only), • hydrochloric acid (HCI, standard preservation for VOC analysis) and • preservation using sodium thiosulfate (a means of preservation by reacting with the excess

permanganate prior to sealing the sample container).

These three sample containers from each well were provided to the EPA mobile field laboratory chemist for VOC analysis (by headspace VOC analysis, Appendix C). Duplicate samples were provided to Resource Laboratories, LLC (for GC/MS analysis using EPA Method 8260, Appendix D) with instructions on the Chain of Custody for holding the permanganate-containing samples until being advised which sample(s) required analysis.

A second conference was held on the evening of May 2, 2001. Based upon the field gas chromatograph data, the samples preserved with sodium thiosulfate were found to contain slightly higher concentrations of VOCs, as compared with the unpreserved or the HCI preserved aliquots. In addition, the field chemist also noted that the vials of HCI preserved aliquots appeared to be under slight "pressure," resulting with the sample syringe immediately filling as the septum was pierced. This pressurization implied a reaction within the sample container between the HCL and the permanganate. Consequently, project personnel

Mr. Randy Smith June 14, 2001 American Environmental Consultants, P.O. Box 310, Mont Vemon, New Hampshire 03057

P \Umon ChemicaI\Maine\Final01 \Correspofidence\Compil of Addi Pwmang rev1.doc


agreed to run the samples preserved with sodium thiosulfate as the Q29 samples. Resource Laboratories, LLC was subsequently advised of this on May 3, 2001 and the appropriate samples queued for analysis.

Should you have questions regarding this information, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely, IT Corporation

Timothy J. Pac, CPG Project Manager

Att: Appendix A - Field Notes Collected During Low FJow Sampling On April 30 And May 1, 2001 Appendix B - Carus Chemical Company Report, May 3, 2001 Appendix C - Field GC Data Appendix D - Q29 Laboratory Analytical Data for VOC's

c: R. Lewis and M. Leahy, IT Corporation T. Connelly, EPA, Boston, MA R. Hewett, MEDEP, Augusta, ME D. Amarante and K. Wlodarchak, Carus Chemical Company

Mr. Randy Smith June 14, 2001 American Environmental Consultants, P.O. Box 310, Mont Vemon, New Hampshire 03057

P \Union Chemical\MameU:inal01\Cofrespondefice\Compil of Addi Permang revl doc


Table 1

Summary of Q29 Information from Wells Exhibiting Unreacted Permanganate Samples Collected April 30, 2001 (B-6A(D)) and May 1, 2001 (all others)

Union Chemical Site Hope, Maine

Location ORP" ConcentrationD Most Recent Addition Pounds of Permanganate Added (mv) (mg/L) 2000 1999 1998

Wells Sampled (preserved by various methods) " -* |̂fer>,,r. B-6A(D) 507 NA/3 1999 0 32 0 B-8A(D) 394 18/5 Sept.-Oct. 2000 by, torpedo 35 0 0 B-9A0) NA 11,600/16,100 Post Q28 and 2000 519 31 0 B-12B(I) 480 24/25 2000 , 4,800 113 0 B-12C(S) 510 NA/4.6 960 108 0 MW-15(D) NA 906 / 940 1999 0 70 0

P-13 475 31/25 Post Q28 and 2000 550 439 313 P-22 NA 3,440 / 3,580 2000 120 585 142 P-23 NA 15,600/15,400 2000 120 347 0

Wells monitored only (no samples collected, other.thaiitlbtgauging and colorimetry) OW-1-1D NA 2,860 / NA Single dose Summer 1999 0 -20 0 OW-3-1L NA 29 /NA Single dose Summer 1999 0 -20 0 OW-3-1D NA 2 /NA 0 19 0 OW-3-2M NA 14 /NA 0 26 0

Notes NA Not applicable or not monitored A Ending Oxidation Reduction Potential (ORP) values from low flow sampling records (attached Appendix A) B Concentrations listed are all as KMnO4 from Carus Chemical Company's onsite colorimetry of unpurged grab sample and sample at end of purging (report dated 5/3/01 attached in Appendix B)

P \Umon Chemical\Maine\Final01\Cofrespondence\Compil of Addi Parmang ravl doc


APPENDIX A

FIELD NOTES COLLECTED DURING LOW FLOW SAMPLING ON APRIL 30 AND MAY 1, 2001

P MJnnn ChemFcal\Maine\Final01\Cotrespondence\Compil of Addi Permang revl doc

Figure 2. Ground Water Sampling Log

Project JL5SLM Site& Well No.fr"B-6A&N Date4fc *fh*/° l

Well Depth . Screen Length. Well Diameter CasingType Sampling Device .Tubing type. .Water Level Measuring Point. . Other Infor

Sampling Personnel

OR? F«f OR? I Time pH Temp Cond. Dis.O2 Turb. =^ Notes

/533 0.̂ 77 G.SD 222=

2dl

12C To?

t.y? 155 6

Type of Samples Collected

3 ••• . .

Information: 2ln«=61TmVft, 4 In «= 2470 mUtt: VolHK.,, «= 4/3n r

'S 3 11 2.oo


Project Site Wt.1l Depth . Screen Length. Well Diameter Casing Type

Sampling Device y... .Tubing type. .Water Level Measuring Point .Otherlnfor

Sampling Personnel ¥ f)AM/CA L,

OR? F+f QRfr \ Time pH Temp Cond. Dis.O2 Turb. Notes

/ t

w.fe iLSL 1 -7

LIL ILL 10" SO 27.3

1.W M.W

1 9? t.tf 3/f

3. 3)

UQ_

a- Z no fa i

Type ot Samples Collected

Intormation: 2 tn *= 617 ml/ft, 4 In » 2470 mUfU^Vol^B nr*h, Vol<rfcj, «= 4/3n i3


Site .Well No.' Well Depth » Sc reen Lenc ?th Well Diameter Caslna Type Sampling Device if Tu blnatvoe Water Level Measuring Point ' Other Infor

^* ^Sampling Personne ~£>f)/N/^ A l*j ftCC.fi C^>

OR? t4«€«l Omts F*r ORl» Time PH Temp Cond. Dis.02 Turb.' ^SSfe fes DTVJ Notes

f

-T/6 W iyr-zf ^0 iS'.li

-)•*£> \io /uy t'.sf r-Ho 130 !*.£*

ryr ISO $.10

*>'-So £30 lf.?t> v^J /s-o f t 61 2-oo

? :otr ?3o 20 2L t'lo $-0 &.**>

• .»'

•

•


Information: 2 In *> 617 mVtt, 4 In - 2470 mVft: Vol̂ e tn»h. Vol.fH.̂ = 4/3n r1

11

Well « Depth Sampling Device Measuring P°'nt


lnforma«on:2ln«61TmVn.4ln*

11


Project 11*1 1 4y Slte ¥ #- JZC . Well No.?L22l/£^Xl Date Well Depth ' Screen Length Well Diameter Casing Type Sampling Device If .Tubing type. .Water Level Measuring Point Otherlnfor

Sampling Personnel

OR? ts F»f Time pH Temp Cond. Dis.O. Turb. ®£ DTV4 Notes

53 ifon

-1-1(9 3-3

^00 (Oft CUcTD .

aba* 39

13t 34 /l


Information: 2 In = 617 mim, 4 In = 2470 mUtt: V o l e pi'h. 4/3n r3

11

35"


Project __1QLL2&^—SUe W//)|Ofl Well No: Well Depth m ^Screjin, Length _Well Diameter. Sampling Device Measuring Point. .Otherlnfor.

Sampling Personnel.

=3^=Temp

OR? Time pH Co

S/(?/ .Casing Type

.Water Level

Notes

0-fl

10

//.*/ 8*2.

09/6 &SD

^r


Information: 2 In «= 617 mlrtt, 4 In = 2470 mUtt: Vot^enr'h, » 4«n i»

11

Rgure 2. Ground Water Sampling Log

Project \ 01x5̂ °̂ Site U /y) t CM Well No.l

Well Depth. Screen Lenqth Well Diameter _ .Casing Type Sampling Device Water Level Measuring Point. . Otherlnfor

Sampling Personnel

OR? »r ORP I Time pH Temp 1 DTvT Notes

? 1730 MM

97% 7,/C V&l

,/?IJ

*&t,IV 20

£77

Type oT Samples Collected

Information: 2 In «= 617 mVft, 4 In «= 2470 ml/ft:

11 \oz>


.Sitefr/y/fcW Well No.Jfr ^ <>" Date

(Veil Depth Sc reen Lenc jth Well Diameter CasmgType

Sampling tDevice if Tu blnatvoe Water Level Measuring Point Otherlnfor

Sampling Personne VD/9AJ/^/^ LJflL(.AC£

OR? U€€«l Uhifs F*r OR? 1

Time

I'lf

;;Vo ;:*// ;.'3"o ;:rri floe? 2^<?f

PH Temp Cond. Dis.O2 Turb.

-•

t=*s nir~ fe

1^0

WO

ISO

)</£>

W

DTVi

//./??«."iy ti.U

VLV(

'il, tf -

Notes

1^10

*:tf 2-2*

&±f

r-io 2- if 2-^ y: tjf 3£~*& F^r

'

^

110

}S~0

Iff

Ho

AST

no tto

12*1

M.W J.?8 3J3

J.3S

3.53

J.^ -.

•


Information: 2 In « 617 mWt, 4 in «= 2470 mlrtt: VoU»nish.Vol.> ̂ = 4/3n i3

/

7. DO


Project \ tn*Hf\ _Well Depth _____ Sampling Device fr Measuring Point

Site .Well No. ScreenLenflth WellDiarneter.

Otherlnfor.

Date .Casing Type

. Water Level

Sampling Personnel Jft_

UnVts F»f

Type of Samptes Collected

InformaUon: 2 In «= 617 mt/tt, 4 In = 2470 mUft: VoKen(»h, = 4/3^

11


.WellNo.1 Well Depth ___ Sampling Device Measuring Point

'|H.pjiameter;

. Otherlnfor

• Casing Type Water Level

Sampling Personnel.

Time PH Temp Cond. Dis.0 Turb.

OR? Notes

izro


Information: 2 In e 617 mWt, 4 In « 2470 mUtt: Vol^c nrti. Vol.pKrt «= 4/3n r3

11

\°(0


APPENDIX B

CARUS CHEMICAL COMPANY REPORT

MAY 3, 2001

P \Union Chemical\Maine\Final01\Correspondence\Compil of Addi Permang revldoc

12003 05/04/01 FRI 09:24 TEL 815 224 6896 CARUS LASALLE LAB OFFICE

CARUS CHEMICAL COMPANY Technology Trip "Report

3 May 2001

To:

From:Tech*

Tim Pac

Kelly Wlodarchak 8547

cc: Dave Amarante Erik Pedersen

Subject: Union Chemical Permanganate Concentrations

SUMMARY From April 30th until May 2* wells on the Union Chemical site were samples and analyzed for permanganate concentrations. The wells were first baled and analyzed and also were purged until various parameters remained constant and then were analyzed. There were twelve wells on the she that still contained residual permanganate out of the approximate 36 wells that were sampled.

CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS There is a wide range in permanganate concentrations within the twelve wells. The she injected both sodium permanganate as well as potassium permanganate. It appears t^»^t the wells that were injected with NaMnO4 had a higher permanganate concentration than the weQs injected with KMnCXi.

RESULTS The results can be seen in the table below,

Well ID Grab Well Sample Purged Well Sample

B-6AfI» NA* 3 B-8A(I» 18 5 B-9Affi 11.600 16.100 B-12BfD 24 25 B-12C(S) NA* 4.6 MW-15(m 906 940 P-13 31 25 P-22 3.440 3.580 P-23 15.600 15.400 OW-1-1D 2.860 NA* OW-3-2M 14 NA* OW-3-1D 2 NA* OW-3-1L 29 NA* * Analysis was not preformed on these samples.

05/04/01 FRI 09:24 TEL 815 224 6896 CARUS LASALLE LAB OFFICE

BACKGROUND The Union Chemical site is that of a former paint stripping chemical manufacturing company during the late 60s and early 70s. Poor containment of spills and the illegal burial of drums filled with contaminants caused the company to be investigated and eventually shut down. The site was listed on the Superfund National Priority List in the 80s, due to excessive groundwater and soil contamination. Trichloroethylene (TCE) and tctrachloroethylene (PCE) among other solvents were present in the surrounding soil and groundwater. The contaminated site posed a serious threat to a nearby trout stream.

In the early 90s, a pump and treat system was installed to treat the contaminated groundwater. A metals removal system and granular activated carbon (GAC) units were also part of the overall treatment system. Hot air injection wells were installed on the site along with a thermal oxidizer and air stripping system. These systems had limited success.

In 1999 and 2000, IT Corporation injected potassium permanganate (at approx. 3% solution) and sodium permanganate (at approx. 20% solution), into 90 wells. Most of the TCE and PCE contamination has been oxidized and several wells are still showing residual permanganate concentrations as high as 16,000 mg/L. The property owners are still negotiating standards for monitoring natural attenuation.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN/PROCEDURES The well samples were either baled for a grab sample or purged until the parameters such as: pH, temperature, total dissolved solids etc... were stabilized. The samples were filtered using a 0.45um syringe filter and diluted if necessary. The samples were analyzed spectrometrically using Hach t>R 890.


APPENDIX C

FIELD GC DATA

P \Union ChemicaI\Maine\Final01 \Cofrespondence\Compil of Addi Psrmang revl doc

en o o> CN CM Cin

1o C\

X UJ 8 i 1 i 1 I i i 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 - ' S.

j£ co *— t-. CO *— m in

- i 1 i 1 1 i i I i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 i CN

Drtn

aled

VO

C

E R

ES

ULT

CO 03 co CC CM

X o i 1 i 1 1 i i 1 i 1 1 1

2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 iI O ' 8 T-

to >- CO O) CO

CO 8 8 T•̂ '"' T- °18 i 1 i 1 1 i i 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CM

0 (0

co CO CD CD d d

m i 1 I 1 1 i i 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 in § ' ' 0o

cn m in CM 0 CM eo

in i 1 i 1 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r

'm B • ' ' ' c

1 2"C n S CM co 13 O 3 a o O in

r- CM 8 7) 8 CM o T— O) 3 71 8I1 N s CM CM in i 1 i 1 1 i 1 1 1

CD* I 1

s 5 CO UJ 0 CM

CM CM CO CM or- i 1 i 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1

•* 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 CO

I co CO co v>

N ? o

8

SA

MP

L

a: A 1 1i 1 i 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1' "5 11 1 1UJ c

co 5 S. o

V" o N

on-C

ht o

rinat

ed V

OC m co co T" ••f it J2 W ^ I i 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •500

u> o o -1 • ' ' ' ep CM CM

ID *- co' 03 S >. >. S f e n co

X o r- ?8 ' ' i i 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f*' ' ' '

g'55 o o

en co. CN CN co o> 8i8 T- •g TO TO

:N 1 i 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 £ CO CO ' 8 £ £ o

1 ' O

" cn 1— 1- r̂ Tt Tf CO in co o> 00 CO ^- c .c

E R

ES

Ul

in D !£. £CM 0 0 O o o oCO CO

1 1 1 1 1 1£ 10 1 I 1 1 1 i 1 STf I1 1 1

4. _J _J

orinate

d V

I

M

r> ' U iSS

1 £ £ CO 0 co CM eo in 00 o § CM d d d•"•• 5 c\i CO 3.

W

CO S 3 S 1 1 1 1i 1 1 1'10 1 IB 11

3 s 3 S8 § g 8 in n S n 8 0 1 g CD "> s CD M n i- o 5 S 8 fe.fe.51 11 1 8 8 5

o N 1 11in 1 1 I CM 1""" "2 o o

UJ o o eo CO in 8 1 if!! ^ g- w co KJ

CN CN CM T- CM ' Ms 3I 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 ' ^ 1 1 1 i 1 i i

4

|| P

rese

rvatio

n ty

pe

^^ ^^ D CD o.

CO

*•*, rT 2, c*> r ! !-£ fit •»̂ " <M>T

T- CO CD 3 ^ 5

d J ••C O O 0 O ugf o 0 O ^ o i « tn CO CO CO 2 1J UJ JJ u u U U U . co c o) to v>

E O E •o °£ £ £ o OUJ oE _l c C_l _i _i ii0

o C C05] J 0 = D. D. Z1a „ j Z < || u II n co M

11 i S "£SS£ ca o m m m

IT Corporation A Member of The IT Croup

APPENDIX D

Q29 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA FOR VOC'S

P \Union Chemical\Mame\Final01\Correspondence\Compil of Addi Permangrevl doc

dichlorodifluoromethane chloromethane vinyl chloride

bromomethane

chloroethane trichlorofluoromethane dielhylether

acetone 1,1-dichloroethene 1,1,2-trifluoro-1,2.2-lrichloroethane methylene chloride carbon disulfide

methyt-t-butyl ether trans-1,2-dichloroethene vinyl acetate 1,1-dichloroe thane 2-butanone (MEK) 2,2-dichloropropane cis-1.2-dichloroethene bromochloromethane chloroform tetrehydrofuran 1,1.1-trichloroelhane carbon telrachloride 1,1 -dichloropropene benzene 1,2-dichloroethane trichloroethene 1,2-dichIoropropane dibromomethane bromodichlorome thane 2-chloroelhytvinyletner

4-methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)

2-hexanone cis-1,3-dichloropropene

SURROGATE STANDARDS

dibromoflouromethanetoluene-d8bromofluorobenzene

U = Below quantitation limit

RL Resource Laboratories, LLC

Lab Number: 3097-13 Sample Designation: B-6A(D) Date Sampled: 04/30/01 Date Analyzed: 05/12/01 Matrix: Water

VOLATILE ORGANICS Method Reference: EPA SW 846, 3rd Edition. Method 8260B.

Concentration ug/L

U u U

u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u . u u u u u u u u u u u

Concentration Quantitation Limit ug/L ug/L U 2 U 5 U 2 u 2 u 2 u 2 u 10 11 10 2.9 1 U 2 U 5 U 2 U 2 U 2 u 10

140 2 U 10 U 2 42 2 U 2 U 2 U 10 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2

9.6 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 10 U 10 U 2

Recovery Acceptance Limits

(*) 93.8 80-120

101.2 81-117

98.4 74 -121

toluene trans-1,3-dichloropropene 1,1.2-trichloroethane

tetrachloroethene 1,3-dichloropropane dibromocnloromethane 1,2-dibromomethane

chlorobenzene 1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane

ethylbenzene

m- and p-xytene o-xylene

styrene bromoform isopropylbenzene

bromobenzene 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 1,2,3-tricnloropropane n-propy!benzene 2-chlorotoluene

4-chlorotoluene 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene tert-butylbenzene 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene sec-butyl benzene 1.3-dichlorobenzene 4-isopropyltoluene 1,4-dichlorobenzene 1,2-dichIorobenzene

n-butytbenzene 1,2-clibromo-3-chloropropane

1,2.4-trichlorobenzene hexachlorobutadiene

naphthalene 1.2.3-trichlorobenzene

Quantitation Limit ug/L

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

Lab Number: 3097-22

Date Sampled: 05/01/01 Date Analyzed: 05/12/01 Matrix: Water

Sample Designation: P-13

VOLATILE ORGANICS Method Reference: EPA SW 846.3rd Edition. Method 8260B.

Concentration Quantitation Limit Concentration Quantitation Limit ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L

4.8 2

chlorome thane U 5 ttans-1,3-dich!oropropene U 2

vinyl chloride U 2 1,1,2-trichloroethane U 2

bromomethane U 2 tetrachloroethene U 2

chlo roe thane U 2 1,3-dicrrteropropane U 2

dich'.orodifluorome thane U 2 toluene

U 2

diethylether U 10 1,2-dibromomethane U 2 trichlorofluoromelhane U 2 dibromochlorome thane

acetone 37 10 chlorobenzene U 2

1.1-dichloroethene U 1 1.1,1,2-tetrachloroethane U 2

U 21,1,2-trifluoro-1,2.2-trichloroethane U 2 ethylbenzene U 2methylene chloride U 5 m- and p-xyler.e U 2carton disulfide U 2 o-xylene U 2methyl-t-butyl ether U 2 styrene

trans-1,2-<Jichloroethene U 2 bromofcrm U 2

vinyl acetate U 10 isopropylbenzene U 2

1.1-dichloroe thane 3 2 bromobenzene U 2

2-butanone (MEK) U 10 1,1.2,2-tetrachloroethane U 2

2.2-dichloropropane U 2 1,2,3-trchlorcpropar.e U 2

cis-1,2-dichloroethene U 2 n-propy!benzene U 2

U 2bromochloromethane U 2 2-chlorotoluene

chloroform U 2 4-chlorctoluene U 2

tetrahydrofuran U 10 1,3,5-tr:methy!benzsne U 2

1,1,1 -trichloroe thane U 2 tert-butylbenzene U 2

carbon tetrachloride U 2 1,2,4-Mmethyl benzene U 2

U 2

benzene U 2 1,3-dicnlorobenzene U 2 1.1-dichloropropene U 2 sec-butylbenzene

U 21,2-dichloroelhane U 2 4-isopropyltoluene

trichloroethene 3 2 1,4-dichlorobenzene U 2

1.2-dichloropropane U 2 1,2-dichlorobenzer,s U 2

dibromomethane U 2 n-butyltenzene U 2

bromodichloromethane U 2 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane U 2

2-chloroethylvinylether U 2 1,2,4-trichIorobenzene U 2

4-methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) U 10 hexachlorobutadier.e U 2

U 22-hexanone U 10 naphthalene

cis-1,3-dichloropropene U 2 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene U 2

SURROGATE STANDARDS Recovery Acceptance Limits

dibromonouromethane 89.2 80-120 toluene-da 101.5 81-117 bromofluorobenzene 97.2 74-121



Lab Number: 3097-24 Sample Designation: B-9A(I) Date Sampled: 05/01/01 Date Analyzed: 05/14/01 Matrix: Water

VOLATILE ORGANICS Method Reference: EPA SW 846. 3rd Edition.

dichlorodifluoromethane

chloromethane vinyl chloride bromome thane chloroethane trichlorofluoromethane diethyletrier acetone 1.1-dichloroethene 1,1,2-trifluoro-1,2.2-trichloroethane

methytene chloride carton dlsulfide

methyt-t-butyl ether

trans-1,2-dichloroethene vinyl acetate 1,1-dichloroethane

2-butanone (MEK) 2.2-dichloropropane cis-1,2-dichloroethene bromochloromethane chloroform

letrahydrofuran

1,1.1 -trichloroe thane carbon tetrachloride

1,1 -dichloropropene

benzene 1,2-dichloroethane trichloroethene 1,2-dichloropropane dibromomethane bromodichloromethane 2-chloroethylvlnytether

4-methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 2-hexanone

cis-1,3-dichloropropene

SURROGATE STANDARDS

dibromoflouromethane

Ioluene-d8

bromofluorobenzene


Concentration

ug/L U U U U U U U

380 U 38 U U U U U

2700 U U U U U U

100 U U U U U U U U U U U U

Recovery

100.2

100.3

100.8

Method 8260B.

Quantitation Limit

ug/L 20 toluene

50 • trans-1,3-dichloropropene

20 1,1,2-trichloroethane

20 tetrachloroethene

20 1,3-dichloropropane

20 dibromochloromelhane

100 1,2-dibromomethane

100 chlorobenzene

10 1.1.1,2-tetrachloroe thane

20 ethylbenzene

50 m- and p-xylene

20 o-xylene

20 styrene

20 bromoform

100 isopropylbenzene

20 bromobenzene

100 1.1,2,2-tetrachloroethane

20 1,2,3-trichloropropane

20 n-propylbenzene

20 2-chlorotoluene

20 4-chIorotoluene

100 1,3,5-trimethyl benzene

20 tert-butylbenzene

20 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene

20 sec-butylbenzene

20 1.3-dichlorobenzene

20 4-isopropyltoluene

20 1,4-dichlorobenzene

20 1,2-dichlorobenzene

20 n-butytbenzene

20 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane

20 1,2.4-trichtorobenzene

100 hexachlorobutadiene

100 naphthalene

20 1,2.3-trichlorobenzene '

Acceptance Limits

80-120

81-117

74-121

Concentration

ug/L

U U

U U

U U U

U U U U U

U U

U U U

U U U U U

U

U U U

U U U U U

U

U U U

Quantitation Limit ug/L 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20


Lab Number. 3097-25 Sample Designation: MW-15(D) Date Sampled: 05/01/01 Date Analyzed: 05/14/01 Matrix: Water

VOLATILE ORGANICS Method Reference: EPA SW 846, 3rd Edition . Method 8260B

Concentration Quantitation Limit Concentration Quantitation Limit

ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L

dichlorodifluoromethane U 2 toluene U 2

chloromethane U 5 trans-1 ,3-dichloropropene U 2

vinyl chloride U 2 1,1,2-trichtoroethane U 2

bromomethane U 2 tetrachloroethene U 2

chloroethane U 2 1,3-dichloropropane U 2

trichlorofluoromethane U 2 (Sbromochloromethane U 2

diethylether U 10 1 ,2-dibromomethane U 2

acetone U 10 chlorobenzene U 2

1 , 1-dichloroethene U 1 1,1,1 ,2-tetracnloroethane U 2

1 ,1 ,2-trifluorc-1 ,2.2-trichloroethane U 2 ethylbenzene U 2

methylene chloride U 5 m- and p-xylene U 2

carbon disulfide U 2 c-xylene U 2

methyl-t-butyl ether U 2 styrene U 2

trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene U 2 bromoform U 2

vinyl acetate U 10 isopropyt benzene U 2

1,1-dichloroe thane U 2 Sromobenzene U 2

2-butanone (MEK) U 10 1,1 ,2,2-tetrachloroethane U 2

2.2-dichloropropane U 2 1 ,2,3-trichloropropane U 2

cis-1 ,2-dichloroethene U 2 n-propyibenzene U 2

bromochioromethane U 2 2-chlorotoluene U 2

chloroform U 2 4-chloro toluene U 2

tetrahydrofuran U 10 1 .3,5-trimethylbenzene U 2

1,1,1-trichloroe thane U 2 tert-butylbenzene U 2

carbon tetrachloride U 2 1 ,2,4-trimethylbenzene U 2

1 . 1 -dichloropropene U 2 sec-butylbenzene U 2

benzene U 2 1,3-dichlorobenzene U 2

1.2-dichloroe thane U 2 4-isopropyltoluene U 2

trichloroethene U 2 1 ,4-dichloro benzene U 2

1 .2-dichloropropane U 2 1 ,2-dichlorobenzene U 2

dibromomethane U 2 n-butylbenzene U 2

bromodichlo'romethane U 2 1 ,2-<libromo-3-chloropropane U 2

2-chloroethyMnylether U 2 1 ,2,4-trichlorobenzene U 2

4-methy1-2-pentanone (MI8K) U 10 hexachlorobutadiene U 2

2-hexanone U 10 naphthalene U 2

cis-1 ,3-dichloropropene U 2 1 ,2,3-trichlorobenzene U 2

note M: Surrogate recovery low due to suspected matrix interference. Sample was run in duplicate to confirm matrix effect on surrogate recovery.


dibromoflouromethane 12.0 M 80-120 toluene-d8 101.6 81-117 .-• bromofluorobenzene 101.3 74-121



Lab Number: 3097-26 Sample Designation: B-12C(S) Date Sampled: 05/01/01 Date Analyzed: 05/12/01 Matrix: Water



ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L

dichlorodifluoromethane 5 2 toluene U 2

chloramethane U 5 -trans-1,3-dichloropropene U 2

vinyl chloride 35 2 1,1,2-trichloroethane U 2

bromomethane U 2 tetrachloroethene 5 2

chloroe thane U 2 1,3-«JichIoropropane U 2 3.1 2

diethytether U 10 1,2-dibromomethane U 2

acetone • 21 10 chlorobenzene U 2

1,1-dichloroethene 62 1 1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane U 2

trichlorofluorome thane U 2 dibromochloromethane

1,1.2-trifluoro-1,2.2-trichloroethane U 2 ethyibenzene U 2

methytene chloride U 5 m- and p-xylene U 2

carton disulfide U 2 e-xytene 5.1 2

methyl-t-butyl ether U 2 styrene U 2

trans-1,2-dichloroethene U 2 bromoform U 2

vinyl acetate U 10 Isopropylbenzene U 2

1,1-dichloroethane 950 D 20 bromobenzene U 2

2-butanone (MEK) 17 10 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane U 2

2,2-dicnloropropane U 2 1,2.3-trichloropropane U 2

cis-1,2-dichloroethene 330 2 n-propylbenzene U 2 2

chloroform U 2 4-chlorotoluene U bromochloromethane U 2 2-chlorotoluene U

2

tetrahydrofuran 68 10 1,3,5-trimelhylbenzene U 2

1.1,1-trichloroethane U 2 tert-butylbenzene U 2

carbon tetrachloride U 2 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene 2.3 2

1,1-dichloropropene U 2 sec-butylbenzene U 2


1,2-dichloroethane U 2 4-isopropvltoluene

trichloroethene 86 2 1,4-dichlorobenzene U 2 U 2

U 21,2-dichloropropane U 2 1,2-dichlorobenzene

dibromomethane U 2 n-butylbenzene U 2


U 22-chloroethylvinytether U 2 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene

4-methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 45 10 hexachlorobutadiene U ' 2



note D: Result taken from a separate analysis of a diluted sample.


dibromoflouromethane 90.3 80 • 120 toluene-d8 101.7 81-117

bromofluorobenzene 98.3 74-121



Lab Number. 3097-30 Sample Designation: B-12B(I) Date Sampled: 05/01/01 Date Analyzed: 05/14/01 Matrix: Water


Concentration Quantitation Limit

ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L

dichlorodifluorome thane U 20 toluene U 20

Concentration Quantitation Limit

chloromethane U 50 -• trans-1,3-dichloropropene U 20


bromomelhane U 20 tetrachloroethene U 20


trichlorofluoromethane U 20 dibromochloromethane U 20

diethylether U 100 1,2-tfibromome thane U 20


1.1-dichloroethene 120 10 1.1,1,2-tetrachloroethane U 20

1,1,2-trifluoro-1,2.2-trichloroe thane U 20 ethylbenzene 120 20

methylene chloride U 50 m- and p-xylene 81 20

cartxin disutfide U 20 o-xylene 49 20

methyM-butyl ether U 20 styrene U 20

trans-1,2-dichloroethene U 20 brcmoform U 20

vinyl acetate U 100 iscpropylbenzene U 20

1,1-dichloroethane 2300 20 bromobenzene U 20

2-butanone (MEK) 270 100 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane U 20

2,2-dichloropropane U 20 1,2,3-trichloropropane U 20

cis-1,2-dichloroethene 590 20 n-propylbenzene U 20

bromcchlorome thane U 20 2-ch!orototuene U 20

chloroform U 20 4-chlorotoluene U 20

tetrahydrofuran U 100 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene U 20

1,1,1 -trichloroethane U 20 tert-butylbenzene U 20

carbon tetrachloride U 20 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene U 20

1,1 -tiichloropropene U 20 sec-butylbenzene U 20


1,2-dichloroethane U 20 4-isopropyltoluene U 20

trichloroethene 28 20 1,4-dichlorobenzene U 20

1,2-dichloropropane U 20 1,2-dichlorobenzene

dibromomethane U 20 rv-butylbenzene U 20 U 20


2-chIoroethylvinylether U 20 1,2,4-trichtorobenzene U 20

U 20 4-methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 280 100 hexachlorobutadiene U 20 2-hexanone U 100 naphthalene U 20 cis-1,3-dichtoropropene U 20 1 ,2,3-trfchlorobenzene


dibromoflouromethane 91.0 80-120 toluene-d8 100.2 81-117 bromofluorobenzene 100.5 74 -121



Lab Number: 3097-33 Sample Designation: B-8A(D) Date Sampled: 05/01/01 Date Analyzed: 05/14/01 Matrix: Water


Concentration Quantitation Limit ug/L

Concentration Quantitatlon Limit

ug/L ug/l. ug/L


chlorome thane U 5 .•trans-1,3-dichloropropene U 2


bromo me thane U 2 tetrachloroethena U 2


trichlorofluoromethane U 2 dibromochloromelhane U 2

diethylether U 10 1,2-dibromomethane U 2


1.1-dichloroethene 1.4 1 1.1,1,2-tetrachloroethane U 2

1,1,2-trifluoro-1,2,2-trichloroethane U 2 ethytbenzene U 2

methylene chloride U 5 m- and p-xylene U 2

carbon disutfide U 2 o-xylene U 2

metnyl-t-butyl ether U 2 styrene U 2

trans-1,2-dichloroethene U 2 bromoform U 2

vinyl acetate U 10 isopropylbenzene U 2

2-butanone (MEK) U 10 1.1,2,2-tetrachloroethane U U 2

2

bromochloromethane U 2 2-chIorotoluene

2,2-dichlorapropane U 2 1.2,3-trichloropropane U 2

cis-1,2-dichloroethene U 2 n-propylbenzene U 2

1,1-dichloroethane 73 2 bromobenzene

U 2


tetrahydrofuran 17 10 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene U 2

1.1.1 -trichloroe thane U 2 tert-butylbenzene U 2

carbon tetrachloride U 2 1.2,4-trimetriy!benzene U 2


benzene U 2 1.3-dichlorobenzene U 2

1,2-dichloroethane U 2 4-isopropyltoluene U 2

trichloroe thene U 2 1,4-dichlorobenzene U 2

1,2-dichloropropane U 2 1,2-dichlorotenzene U 2

dibromomethane U 2 n-butyl benzene U 2

bromodichlorbmethane U 2 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane U 2

2-chloroethylvinylether U 2 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene U 2

U 10 hexachlorobutadiene U 24-methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 2-hexanone U 10 naphthalene U 2



dibromodouromethane 98.7 80 -120 toluene-d8 100.4 81-117 bromofluorobenzene 101.1 74-121



Lab Number: 3109-01




Concentration Quantitation Limit Concentration Quantitation Limit ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L


chlorome thane U 5 : trans-1,3-dichloropropene U 2

vinyl chloride U 2 1,1,2-trchloroethane U 2

bromomelhane U 2 tetrachloroethene U 2

chloroethane U 2 1,3-dichIoropropane U 2

U 2

diethylether U 10 1,2-dibromomethane U 2


1.1-dichloroethene U 1 1,1.1,2-tetrachloroethane U 2

trichlorofluoromethane U 2 CTbromochlorome thane

1.1,2-trifluoro-1,2,2-trichloroethane 86 2 ettiylbenzene U 2

U 2methylene chloride U 5 m- and p-xylene

carbon disulfide U 2 o-xyler.e U 2

U 2methyl-t-butyt ether U 2 styrene

trans-1,2-dichloroethene U 2 bromoforrn U 2

vinyl acetate U 10 isopropytbenzene U 2

U 2

2-butanone (MEK) U 10 1,1,2,2-tetrachtoroethane U 2

2,2-dichloropropane U 2 1,2.3-trichloropropane U 2

1.1-dichloroethane 1100 D 20 fcromobenzene

cis-1,2-dichloroethene U 2 n-propyibenzene U 2

U 2bfomochloromethane U 2 2-chlcrotoluene

chlorofonn U 2 4-chlorotoluene U 2

tetrahydrofuran U 10 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene U 2

1,1,1-trichloroe thane 200 2 tert-butylbenzene U 2

carbon tetrachloride U 2 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene U 2


U 2benzene U 2 LS-dichlorcbenzene U 21,2-dichloroe thane U 2 4-isopropyltoluene

trichloroethene U 2 1,4-dich!orobenzene U 2

1,2-dichloropropane U 2 1,2-dichlorobenzene U 2

U 2dibromome thane U 2 n-but/benzene

bromodichlo'rome thane U 2 1.2-dibromo-3-chloropropane U 2

2-chloroethylvinylether U 2 1,2,4-trichIorobenzene U 2

4-methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) U 10 hexachlorobutadiene U 2


cis-1,3-dichloropropene U 2 1,2,3-trichtorobenzene U 2

note D: Result taken from a seperate analysis of a diluted sample.

SURROGATE'STANDARDS Recovery Acceptance Limits

dibromoflouromethane 99.1 80-120 toluene-d8 101.4 81-117 bromofluorobenzene 100.0 74 -121



Lab Number: 3109-03





ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L


chloromelhane U 5 trans-1 ,3-dichloropropene U 2

vinyl chloride U 2 1.1,2-trichloroethane U 2

bromomethane U 2 teta chloroe thene U 2

chloroe thane U 2 1,3-dichtoropropane U 2

trichlorofluoromethane U 2 dibromochloromethane U 2

diethylether U 10 1 ,2-djbromomethane U 2

acetone U 10 chloro benzene U 2

1.1-dichloroethene U 1 1.1.1 ,2-tetrachloroe thane U 2

1 ,1 .2-trifluoro-1 ,2.2-trichloroethane U 2 ethylbenzene U 2

mettiytene chloride U 5 m- and p-xytene U 2

carbon disulfide U 2 o-xylene U 2

methyl-t-butyt ether U 2 styrene U 2

trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene U 2 bromoform U 2

vinyl acetate U 10 isepropylbenzene U 2

1,1-dichloroethane 170 2 bromobenzene U 2

2-butanone (MEK) U 10 1 .1 ,2,2-tetrachloroe thane U 2

2,2-dichloropropane U 2 1 ,2,3-trichloropropane U 2

cis-1 ,2-dichloroethene U 2 n-propy!benzene U 2

bromochloromethane U 2 2-chIorotoluene U 2


tetrahydrofuran U 10 1 .3,5-trimethylbenzene U 2

1,1,1-trichloroethane U 2 tert-butylbenzene U 2

carbon tetrachloride U 2 1 ,2,4-trimethylbenzene U 2


benzene U 2 1 ,3-dichloroben2ene U 2

1,2-dichloroe thane U 2 4-isopropyttoluene U 2

trichloroethene U 2 1 ,4-dichtorobenzene U 2

1.2-dichloropropane U 2 1 ,2-dichIorobenzene U 2

dibromome thane U 2 n-buryfbenzene U 2

bromodichloromethane U 2 1 ,2-diofomo-3-chloropropane U 2

2-chloroethytvinylether U 2 1 ,2.4-trichlorobenzene U 2

4-methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) U 10 hexachlorobutadiene U 2

2-hexanone U 10 naphthalene U 2

cis-1 ,3-dichloropropene U 2 1,2.3-trichlorobenzene U 2

note M: Surrogate recovery low due to suspected matrix interference. Sample was run in duplicate to confirm matrix effect on surrogate recovery.


dibromoflouromethane 43.8 M 80-120 toluene-d8 101.5 81-117

bromofluorobenzene 102.1 74-121



COMPILATION OF ADDITIONAL PERMANGANATE … · Mr. Randy Smith Jun 14 200, 1 e American Environmenta...

Documents

Transcript of COMPILATION OF ADDITIONAL PERMANGANATE … · Mr. Randy Smith Jun 14 200, 1 e American Environmenta...