Lowell, MA 01852 TRC Environmenta Corporatiol n SDMS DocID ... · TRC Environmenta Corporatiol n...
33
Booti Mills South, Foot of John Street Lowell, MA 01852 TRC Environmental Corporation •s (508) 970-5600 SDMS DocID 3917 April 17, 1995 Ms. Christine Clark Regional Sample Control Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Services Division 60 Westview Street CT WASTE MANAGEMENT CRATC Lexington, MA 02173-3185 CT SUPERFUi-JD SECTION Reference: Contract No. 68-W9-0033, ARCS Work Assignment No. 22-1LB7 Gallups Quarry Superfund Site Subject: Deliverable: Data Validation Report Case # 23127 SDG: MACZ38 CLP Lab: Skinner & Sherman Metals: 4/aqueous/MACZ38, MAEN08, MAGD77, MAGZ28 Cyanide: 4/aqueous/MACZ38, MAEN08, MAGD77, MAGZ28 Dear Ms. Clark: In accordance with the reporting requirements of the subject work assignment, enclosed is a Data Validation Report for case 23127 which was generated by Quality Specialists & Environmental Analysts, Inc., TRCC's Data Validation Subcontractor for this work assignment. The Tier El validation was performed on analytical data of samples collected by TRCC at the Gallups Quarry Superfund Site during the sampling event conducted on January 12, 1995. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (508) 656-3553. Sincerely yours, ;• „ Edward J. ^MacKinnon Lead Chemist Enclosures cc: Leslie McVickar/EPA RPM Cathy Lielausis^TRCC Project Manager Paul Hughes/TRCC Program Manager (letter only) Offices in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York. North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, Utah and Wyoming A TRCCompany A-- Equal Opportune, Employe 1
Transcript of Lowell, MA 01852 TRC Environmenta Corporatiol n SDMS DocID ... · TRC Environmenta Corporatiol n...
Booti Mills South Foot of John Street
Lowell MA 01852
TRC Environmental Corporation bulls (508) 970-5600
SDMS DocID 3917 April 17 1995
Ms Christine Clark Regional Sample Control Coordinator US Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Services Division 60 Westview Street
CT WASTE MANAGEMENT CRATC Lexington MA 02173-3185 CT SUPERFUi-JD SECTION
Reference Contract No 68-W9-0033 ARCS Work Assignment No 22-1LB7 Gallups Quarry Superfund Site
Subject Deliverable Data Validation Report Case 23127 SDG MACZ38 CLP Lab Skinner amp Sherman Metals 4aqueousMACZ38 MAEN08 MAGD77 MAGZ28 Cyanide 4aqueousMACZ38 MAEN08 MAGD77 MAGZ28
Dear Ms Clark
In accordance with the reporting requirements of the subject work assignment enclosed is a Data Validation Report for case 23127 which was generated by Quality Specialists amp Environmental Analysts Inc TRCCs Data Validation Subcontractor for this work assignment The Tier El validation was performed on analytical data of samples collected by TRCC at the Gallups Quarry Superfund Site during the sampling event conducted on January 12 1995
If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (508) 656-3553
Sincerely yours bull bdquo
Edward J MacKinnon Lead Chemist
Enclosures
cc Leslie McVickarEPA RPM Cathy Lielausis^TRCC Project Manager Paul HughesTRCC Program Manager (letter only)
Offices in California Colorado Connecticut Illinois Louisiana Massachusetts Minnesota Nevada New Jersey New Mexico
New York North Carolina Ohio Oregon Texas Utah and Wyoming A TRC Company
A-- Equal Opportune Employe1
FILL isoaoAincs 7HZ (CS7)
b Na=e SKXM AND LABS y sc No rYYAOZ2gt8 SDG Sos Co Tollov
63-amp0-b3 Corcracz No -0^6 SOW No 390
All docuserrs delivered is che Cocoleca SDG File nusz blaquo origi^il docusencs where possible (2laquopoundarence ZxhibiS E Seccion II D and Secziaa III V)
Cheek)
1 2
3
4
5 6
7
8 9
10 11 12
13 14
15
16
17 IS
19 20
21
22
23
Irveasarr Sc c (DC-2) (Do noc m=ber) Cover Page
i Shees (Tors I-1H) Isiriil amp Coscirstiag CAlibrarion Vlaquorifiampa=ioa (Tors IIA-ET) CSDL Sca=dards (Tora 113 -IS) Sla=ia ltor= H1-1S) 1C Iscarfarsncs Check Sasie (Tors 17- IS) Spiie S==le Recovery (For= VA-IS) Poc Diglaquoac Spika S=le SLacovery (7ora V3-IS) Dulicacas (Tora 71 -IS) Lab Concrsl S=le (Tors 711-13) Seacdird Addlrion aaulss (Tors Till -IS) 1C Serixl Diluciau (Tora 33- IS) Isarrj=laquoa= Dlaquocac=ion Liaiza (Tors X-EO 1C Iscaralesesc Correcrioa Tterars (Tors HA- 15) 1C In=rele=e=s Correction (Tors X13-20
1C Linear RraquoSes (Tora XII-IH)
rearraquocisa Lag ( ora EH-IS)
Asalysia Slaquo=i Log (rosa JG7-IS)
T-^macs AA Raw Da=a
Mercur- =Uv Oaca
C a a i d e av Daa
^ ^
_j[_ _
Q II
^
lH
_ I
1 f
S 7 31
57
Q7
lt
( u
gt
t _ x
I
(
S
X
f
1 if
ar= D C - 2
bull Vos (Please Check)
pound77=
affic Report 25 ZrA Shippirgreceivirg Doc-^=ents
Airbill (No of Shipsents O3 Chiin-of-Custody Records US Sample Tags
Sasple Lag-In Sheet (Lab amp DC1) 04 us SDG Cover Sheet Ok
26 Kisc ShippingReceiving Records
(list all individual records)
Telephone Logs
iii 27 Intarral Lib Sasple Transfer Records amp
Tracking Sheets (describe or list) UA ill Od
CUMo OF
2S Ircsrral Origir^l Prep amp Ar^lysis Records
(describe or list)
Prep Records
Ar-alysis Records
Description STANDARDS rPE ICG
29 Other Records (describe or list)
Telephone Caerunicacion Lag ili ORIGINAL SHIPPING DCCLgtENTS rn_shy
DATA
Co=letad by (CL Lib) JOKMSCN
U5HPA DATA fflNAC-ZR (Print Na=e amp Tide) (DM)
For= DC-2 (continued) 390
DUALITY SPECIALISTS amp ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSTS INC J^^^^rytltty
Environmental Data Validation amp Interpretation
April 111995
Ms Christine Clark Regional Sample Control Coordinator US Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Services Division 60 Westview Street Lexington MA 02173-3185
Dear Ms Clark
RE Prime ContractSubcontract 68-W9-00331-636-999-QSEA Work Assignment 0163602301LB73 Case 23127 SDG MACZ38 Lab Name Skinner amp Sherman Site Name Gallups Quarry Superfund Site
A Tier III validation was performed on the inorganic analytical data from Case 23127 four samples collected by TRC Environmental Corporation at the Gallups Quarry Superfund site The data was evaluated based on the following parameters
data completeness holding times calibration
laboratory and field blank analyses matrix spike recoveries
laboratory and field duplicates laboratory control sample results furnace atomic absorption results serial dilution results detection limit results sample results
All criteria were met for this parameter
QSEA 30-1-776-04000403
PO Box 670 Dunbar West Virginia 25064 PhoneFax
Table 1 summarizes the validation recommendations which were based on the following information
- Laboratory and Field Blank Analyses
Blank detections are summarized below
ElementsAluminum
Maximum Concentration (ugL)
359
Action Level (ugL)
1795
Antimony Calcium Copper
Iron Sodium Thallium
Zinc
[
-147 OR a9DO
185 125
7173 2
167
735 483 925 625 3585
10 835
Value gt IDL and lt Action Level = Report value u Value gt IDL and gt Action Level = Report value unqualified
Batch results have been modified in accordance with the criteria above
Matrix Spike Recoveries
Matrix Spike R result was outside the criteria for cyanide All samples were flagged as estimated
Very truly yours
QSEA Inc
Steven J Lasky Inorganic Data Reviewer
SJLirs
cc EPA - Leslie McVickar
MA38RWPS Page 2 of 3 - TRC SDG MACZ38 Validation Report
Gallups Quarry Superfund Site Case MACZ38
Table I Recommendation Summary
Element Flag Element Flag Aluminum A1 Magnesium A Antimony A1 Manganese A
Arsenic A Mercury A
Barium A Nickel A
Beryllium A Potassium A
Cadmium A Selenium A
Calcium A Silver A
Chromium A Sodium A
Cobalt A Thallium A1
Copper A1 Vanadium A
Iron A Zinc A1
Lead A Cyanide J
DATA SUMMARY KEY
A - Accept all data
A1 - Accept data raise the sample detection limit(s) as needed due to blank contamination or report as unqualified
Estimate all positive values (J) and detection limits (UJ) due to low matrix spike recoveries These estimated results would be minimum values
MA38RWPS Page 3 of 3 - TRC SFXr 8MACZ38 Validation Report
TABLE MACZ38-A INORGANIC DATA SUMMARY TABLE
VALIDATED DATA FOR TRC ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION GALLUPS QUARRY SUPERFUND SITE
CASEfZ3127 SDG4MACZ38 LABORATORY SKINNER AND SHERMAN LABS INC
SAMPLE ID MACZ38 MAEN06 MAOP77 MAOZ2 SAMPLE LOCATION MW104TT TAXBOX-76 MW104TTD MW-112S LAB ID 01083415 01083-023 01083-038 4108344$ SAMPLE DATE 011295 011295 011295 01126 SAMPLE MATRIX WATER WATER WATER WATER DILUTION FACTOR 10 10 10 U SOLIDS NA NA NA NA
METHOD IDL CONC CONC CONC CONC CRDL CAS ANALYTE FPCVC UGL UGL Q UGL a UGL Q UGL Q UGL
742940-5 Aluminum P 183 569 U 183 U 710 U 492 200 7440-36-0 Antimony P 136 136 U 136 U 136 U 136 U 60 7440-38-2 Arsenic P 20 20 U 20 U 20 U 20 U 10 7440-39-3 Barium P 44 91 157 144 340 200 7440-41-7 Beryllium P 10 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 7440-43-9 Cadmium P 09 090 U 090 U 090 U 090 U 5 7440-70-2 Calcium P 458 11700 19200 11900 13000 5000 7440-47-3 Chromium P 36 36 U 36 U 36 U 106 10 7440-48-4 Cobalt P 16 16 U 16 U 16 U 16 U 60 7440-60-8 Copper P 23 118 U 135 U 34 U 68 U 25 743949-6 Iron P 50 690 306 I U 105 530 100 7439-92-1 Lead P 09 19 13 14 090 U 3 7439-95-4 Magnesium P 470 2110 2400 2220 2170 5000 7439-96-5 Manganese P 10 616 10 U 669 929 16 7439-97-6 Mercury CV 02 020 U 020 U 020 U 020 U 02 7440-02-0 Nickel P 39 39 U 39 U 39 U 39 U 40 7440-09-7 Potassium P 112 2880 2370 2870 1930 5000
7782-49-2 Selenium P 30 30 U 30 U 30 U 30 U 6 7440-22-4 Silver P 35 35 U 35 U 35 U 35 U 10 7440-23-5 Sodium P 543 5670 5490 5460 7520 5000 7440-28-0 Thallium P 18 18 U 18 U 18 U 18 U 10 7440-62-2 Vanadium P 30 30 U 30 U 30 U 30 U 90 7440-66-6 Zinc P 32 32 U 32 U 32 U 32 U 20 5955-70-0 Cyanide c 10 100 UJ 100 UJ 100 UJ 100 UJ 10
Analytical Method F = Furnace P = ICPFlame AA CV = Cold Vapor C Cotorimetric
QSEA File MA38M Page 1 of 1
QsEAlnc raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull-
Region i INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO 23127 SITE Qallups Quarry Superfund LABORATORY Skinner and Sherman labs NO OF SAMPLES
MATRIX 4 Met4 Cy Water SDG MACZ38 REVIEWER QSEA Inc SOW ILM030 REVIEWERS NAME Steven J Lasky DPO ACTION FYI X COMPLETION DATE 040995
bull bull bull bull - - -^^ - i^--^w - bull
1CP AA Ha CYAttDC
1 HOLDING TIMES 0 NA O O
2 CALIBRATIONS O NA O 0
3 BLANKS X NA O O
4 ICS O NA NA NA
6 LCS 0 NA O O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS O NA 0 O
7 MATRIX SPIKE O NA O M
8 MSA NA NA NA NA
9 SERIAL DILUTION O NA O O
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION O NA O O
11 OTHER QC O NA O O
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT 0 NA 0 O
O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M = Data qualified due to major problems Z = Data unacceptable X = Problems but do not affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN XDETECTION LIMITS WERE RAISED DUE TO BLANK CONTAMINATION M=R WAS OUTSIDE CRITERIA FOR CYANIDE ALL DATA ESTIMATED
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
Form INT3-18
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 26
REGION I Site Name Gallups Quarry Superfund Data Review Worksheets
REGION I REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TIER III VALIDATION LEVEL
The hardcopied Skinner and Sherman data package received at QSEA Inc has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data review included
Case No 23127 SAS No NA Sampling Date(s) 011295 SDG No MACZ38 Matrix Water Shipping Date(s) 011395 No of Samples 4 Met4 cy Date Recd by Lab 011695
Traffic Report Nos MMW fflKZ- 3ST PfUgfs- AUampP77 flMi 3 F
Trip Blank No None Equipment Blank No None Field Duplicate Nos MACZM AND MAGD77
SOW ILM030 requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
raquo Data Completeness raquo Field Duplicates raquo Holding Times raquo Lab Control Sample Results raquo Calibrations raquo ICP Serial Dilution Results Blanks raquo Detection Limit Results ICP Interference Check Results raquo Sample Quantitation raquo Matrix Spike Recoveries Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Comments Qualification required due to blanks and matrix spike only
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable Data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer steven J Lasky Date 040995
Form INT3-1
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 1
I
SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
DATA COMPLETENESS
MISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATA RECEIVED
None
FormlNTO-2
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 2
7 A Jvir- ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ QSL gt IftC
REC 5IONI Datlt Review Worksheets
11 HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and enter an X beside the analysis date for samples not within criteria
hg CYANIDE OTHERS SAMPLE ID DATE DATE DATE DATE pH ACTION
SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
CN=12 MACZ38 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGD77 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGZ28 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=25 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAEN08 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
METALS - 180 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimated (J) and non-detects
are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
FormMTI-3
OSEA Rte MA36F325WB2 - 3
V7~I l(s f^-r r-r rv n-r gtj QSEA2
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
III A IN JTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criter a
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
DATE ICWCCV ANALYTE R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
NONE
ACTIO NS
If any poundjnalyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
For Positive Results
Accept Estimate (J) toJlaquoet(R)
Metals 90-110R 75-89R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 20R 65-79R 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115R 70-84R 116-130R lt70R gt130R
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estimate (UJ) R^ct(IQ
Metals 90-1 25R 75-89R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 35R 65-79R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-1 30R 70-84R lt70R gt130R
FormWTS^
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 4
Cf7A lins ~~~~~ ~~^~ ^tjJ2 ri AfrC bull ~~~ ~~~~mdash ~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^~~^-^-^^
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence Mark One
a Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW Yes X No
b Were calibrations performed at the beginning of each analysis Yes X No
c Were calibration standards analyzed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency of ten percent or every two hours during analysis whichever is more frequent Yes X No
d Were the correlation coefficients for the calibration curves for AA Hg and CN gt= 0995 Yes X No
e Was the standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes X No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
Form (NTS-laquo
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 5
a INORGANIC INITIAL CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012695
ICPAnalyte COPPER Lab Value 1051
R = 5107 V 4860 100 1051 R
File Name NA Date of Initial Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1004
R 502 50 100 1004
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 1052
R 989 940 100 1052 R
Form INT3-SA
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 6
SEA Inc ~~~
INORGANIC CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name CCV1 Date of Continuing Calibration 012695
ICP Analyte IRON Lab Value 1008
R 100830 100000 100 1008 R
File Name NA Date of Continuing Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name CCV2 Date of Continuing Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1160
R 23 20 100 1160 R
File Name CCV3 Date of Continuing Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 988
R 1976 2000 100 988 R
FonnlNT3-9B
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 7
Q SEA 1m ^ bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANI-(ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List tht j blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat moratory Blanks
DATE
012695
012695
012695
012695
012695
IC8CC8 PREP BLANK ANALYTE
CCB1CCB3 PE IW Aluminum
CCB1 Antimony
ICBCCB1 Calcium
ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3(all) PE IW Copper
CCB1CCB3 PE SW Iron
CONC4laquon4
2563592565
-147
565966
185160841011178
86125560
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLANK ANALYTE CONCltUBL)
3 Fre quency Requirements
a Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matri for every 20 samples and for each digestion bate
x h Yes x No
b Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The j data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonriMn-C
OSEA filraquo MA38F325WB2 - 8
Q X- J [ sift S bull 4+++ gt^^^^^rf^-v-laquo^lti^ w ++ +++ r + + + ltgt^ ++ +-r+r+rtrrt (gt ++ ++ r++ bullbull r t r +r +++bull++ r U i JLf bullbullbullbullpound f-tSw
bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the 1 blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat gtoratory Blanks
-t)Ateuro- - KampCCB mEPBUWK ANALYTE CONCMagL)
012695 CCB3 PBW Sodium 6557173
012695 CCB1 Thallium 20
012695 ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3 (all) PBW Zinc 1679332-48320
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE ECWtP BLANK AJ1ALYTE CQHClugtL)
3 Fre quency Requir ements
a Was a prepare for every 20 s
)tion blank analyzed for each matrix amples and for each digestion batch Yes x No
b Was a calibral every 2 hours
ion blank run every 10 samples or whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonnlNT3-C
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 9
a CJ7jd Tlaquogt ~^^^^^~~~~~~^^^lt~~^^4~~^^~^^~~~^~~~ jJCtfLj I Tls ~~rr~rr
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
IV B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 4)
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five times the highest concentration of that elements contamination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
a When the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
b When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration unqualified
MATRIX Water MATRIX Water
ELEMENT MAXGONC (ugAJ jujiLr
ELEMENT MAX CONGJ AU
Aluminum 359 1795 Antimony -147 73 5
Calcium 966 483
Copper 185 925
Iron 125 625
Sodium 7173 35865
Thallium 2 10
Zinc 167 835
NO TE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to mgkg in order to compare them with the sample results
Cone in ugL X (Volume diluted to (200ml)Weight digested (1gram)) X (1L1 000ml) X (1000gm1kg) X(1mg1000ug) = mgkg
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
Form INT3-7
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 10
SEA IncshyREGION I Data Review Worksheets
V A ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 amp 2)
1 Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not meet the criteria for R
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
none
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample Results R J J Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8-hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FormWTM
QSEA File MA36F325WB2 - 11
Q SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ICS A solution gt 2xlDL that should not be present
Cone of kiterferents Element CONC Detected in the IC9 to the ICS
AL CA FE MG
Barium 14 514927 529351 190348 543610
Sodium 934 514927 529351 190348 543610
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the samples affected by interferences below
Sample Element Sample Merferant Estimated Affected Affected Sample Cone (ugL) Cone bullileffL
AIL CA FE MG (UBU
None
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of A) Ca Fe and Mg are less than 50 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 50 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
FormMT34
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 12
a ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-lnitial
ALUMINUM Lab Value 1004
ICSR 5095600 5077570 x 100 1004
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-Final
MAGNESIUM Lab Value 1018
ICSR 5435000 5336850 x 100 = 1018
Form INT3-9A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 13
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
FILL isoaoAincs 7HZ (CS7)
b Na=e SKXM AND LABS y sc No rYYAOZ2gt8 SDG Sos Co Tollov
63-amp0-b3 Corcracz No -0^6 SOW No 390
All docuserrs delivered is che Cocoleca SDG File nusz blaquo origi^il docusencs where possible (2laquopoundarence ZxhibiS E Seccion II D and Secziaa III V)
Cheek)
1 2
3
4
5 6
7
8 9
10 11 12
13 14
15
16
17 IS
19 20
21
22
23
Irveasarr Sc c (DC-2) (Do noc m=ber) Cover Page
i Shees (Tors I-1H) Isiriil amp Coscirstiag CAlibrarion Vlaquorifiampa=ioa (Tors IIA-ET) CSDL Sca=dards (Tora 113 -IS) Sla=ia ltor= H1-1S) 1C Iscarfarsncs Check Sasie (Tors 17- IS) Spiie S==le Recovery (For= VA-IS) Poc Diglaquoac Spika S=le SLacovery (7ora V3-IS) Dulicacas (Tora 71 -IS) Lab Concrsl S=le (Tors 711-13) Seacdird Addlrion aaulss (Tors Till -IS) 1C Serixl Diluciau (Tora 33- IS) Isarrj=laquoa= Dlaquocac=ion Liaiza (Tors X-EO 1C Iscaralesesc Correcrioa Tterars (Tors HA- 15) 1C In=rele=e=s Correction (Tors X13-20
1C Linear RraquoSes (Tora XII-IH)
rearraquocisa Lag ( ora EH-IS)
Asalysia Slaquo=i Log (rosa JG7-IS)
T-^macs AA Raw Da=a
Mercur- =Uv Oaca
C a a i d e av Daa
^ ^
_j[_ _
Q II
^
lH
_ I
1 f
S 7 31
57
Q7
lt
( u
gt
t _ x
I
(
S
X
f
1 if
ar= D C - 2
bull Vos (Please Check)
pound77=
affic Report 25 ZrA Shippirgreceivirg Doc-^=ents
Airbill (No of Shipsents O3 Chiin-of-Custody Records US Sample Tags
Sasple Lag-In Sheet (Lab amp DC1) 04 us SDG Cover Sheet Ok
26 Kisc ShippingReceiving Records
(list all individual records)
Telephone Logs
iii 27 Intarral Lib Sasple Transfer Records amp
Tracking Sheets (describe or list) UA ill Od
CUMo OF
2S Ircsrral Origir^l Prep amp Ar^lysis Records
(describe or list)
Prep Records
Ar-alysis Records
Description STANDARDS rPE ICG
29 Other Records (describe or list)
Telephone Caerunicacion Lag ili ORIGINAL SHIPPING DCCLgtENTS rn_shy
DATA
Co=letad by (CL Lib) JOKMSCN
U5HPA DATA fflNAC-ZR (Print Na=e amp Tide) (DM)
For= DC-2 (continued) 390
DUALITY SPECIALISTS amp ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSTS INC J^^^^rytltty
Environmental Data Validation amp Interpretation
April 111995
Ms Christine Clark Regional Sample Control Coordinator US Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Services Division 60 Westview Street Lexington MA 02173-3185
Dear Ms Clark
RE Prime ContractSubcontract 68-W9-00331-636-999-QSEA Work Assignment 0163602301LB73 Case 23127 SDG MACZ38 Lab Name Skinner amp Sherman Site Name Gallups Quarry Superfund Site
A Tier III validation was performed on the inorganic analytical data from Case 23127 four samples collected by TRC Environmental Corporation at the Gallups Quarry Superfund site The data was evaluated based on the following parameters
data completeness holding times calibration
laboratory and field blank analyses matrix spike recoveries
laboratory and field duplicates laboratory control sample results furnace atomic absorption results serial dilution results detection limit results sample results
All criteria were met for this parameter
QSEA 30-1-776-04000403
PO Box 670 Dunbar West Virginia 25064 PhoneFax
Table 1 summarizes the validation recommendations which were based on the following information
- Laboratory and Field Blank Analyses
Blank detections are summarized below
ElementsAluminum
Maximum Concentration (ugL)
359
Action Level (ugL)
1795
Antimony Calcium Copper
Iron Sodium Thallium
Zinc
[
-147 OR a9DO
185 125
7173 2
167
735 483 925 625 3585
10 835
Value gt IDL and lt Action Level = Report value u Value gt IDL and gt Action Level = Report value unqualified
Batch results have been modified in accordance with the criteria above
Matrix Spike Recoveries
Matrix Spike R result was outside the criteria for cyanide All samples were flagged as estimated
Very truly yours
QSEA Inc
Steven J Lasky Inorganic Data Reviewer
SJLirs
cc EPA - Leslie McVickar
MA38RWPS Page 2 of 3 - TRC SDG MACZ38 Validation Report
Gallups Quarry Superfund Site Case MACZ38
Table I Recommendation Summary
Element Flag Element Flag Aluminum A1 Magnesium A Antimony A1 Manganese A
Arsenic A Mercury A
Barium A Nickel A
Beryllium A Potassium A
Cadmium A Selenium A
Calcium A Silver A
Chromium A Sodium A
Cobalt A Thallium A1
Copper A1 Vanadium A
Iron A Zinc A1
Lead A Cyanide J
DATA SUMMARY KEY
A - Accept all data
A1 - Accept data raise the sample detection limit(s) as needed due to blank contamination or report as unqualified
Estimate all positive values (J) and detection limits (UJ) due to low matrix spike recoveries These estimated results would be minimum values
MA38RWPS Page 3 of 3 - TRC SFXr 8MACZ38 Validation Report
TABLE MACZ38-A INORGANIC DATA SUMMARY TABLE
VALIDATED DATA FOR TRC ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION GALLUPS QUARRY SUPERFUND SITE
CASEfZ3127 SDG4MACZ38 LABORATORY SKINNER AND SHERMAN LABS INC
SAMPLE ID MACZ38 MAEN06 MAOP77 MAOZ2 SAMPLE LOCATION MW104TT TAXBOX-76 MW104TTD MW-112S LAB ID 01083415 01083-023 01083-038 4108344$ SAMPLE DATE 011295 011295 011295 01126 SAMPLE MATRIX WATER WATER WATER WATER DILUTION FACTOR 10 10 10 U SOLIDS NA NA NA NA
METHOD IDL CONC CONC CONC CONC CRDL CAS ANALYTE FPCVC UGL UGL Q UGL a UGL Q UGL Q UGL
742940-5 Aluminum P 183 569 U 183 U 710 U 492 200 7440-36-0 Antimony P 136 136 U 136 U 136 U 136 U 60 7440-38-2 Arsenic P 20 20 U 20 U 20 U 20 U 10 7440-39-3 Barium P 44 91 157 144 340 200 7440-41-7 Beryllium P 10 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 7440-43-9 Cadmium P 09 090 U 090 U 090 U 090 U 5 7440-70-2 Calcium P 458 11700 19200 11900 13000 5000 7440-47-3 Chromium P 36 36 U 36 U 36 U 106 10 7440-48-4 Cobalt P 16 16 U 16 U 16 U 16 U 60 7440-60-8 Copper P 23 118 U 135 U 34 U 68 U 25 743949-6 Iron P 50 690 306 I U 105 530 100 7439-92-1 Lead P 09 19 13 14 090 U 3 7439-95-4 Magnesium P 470 2110 2400 2220 2170 5000 7439-96-5 Manganese P 10 616 10 U 669 929 16 7439-97-6 Mercury CV 02 020 U 020 U 020 U 020 U 02 7440-02-0 Nickel P 39 39 U 39 U 39 U 39 U 40 7440-09-7 Potassium P 112 2880 2370 2870 1930 5000
7782-49-2 Selenium P 30 30 U 30 U 30 U 30 U 6 7440-22-4 Silver P 35 35 U 35 U 35 U 35 U 10 7440-23-5 Sodium P 543 5670 5490 5460 7520 5000 7440-28-0 Thallium P 18 18 U 18 U 18 U 18 U 10 7440-62-2 Vanadium P 30 30 U 30 U 30 U 30 U 90 7440-66-6 Zinc P 32 32 U 32 U 32 U 32 U 20 5955-70-0 Cyanide c 10 100 UJ 100 UJ 100 UJ 100 UJ 10
Analytical Method F = Furnace P = ICPFlame AA CV = Cold Vapor C Cotorimetric
QSEA File MA38M Page 1 of 1
QsEAlnc raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull-
Region i INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO 23127 SITE Qallups Quarry Superfund LABORATORY Skinner and Sherman labs NO OF SAMPLES
MATRIX 4 Met4 Cy Water SDG MACZ38 REVIEWER QSEA Inc SOW ILM030 REVIEWERS NAME Steven J Lasky DPO ACTION FYI X COMPLETION DATE 040995
bull bull bull bull - - -^^ - i^--^w - bull
1CP AA Ha CYAttDC
1 HOLDING TIMES 0 NA O O
2 CALIBRATIONS O NA O 0
3 BLANKS X NA O O
4 ICS O NA NA NA
6 LCS 0 NA O O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS O NA 0 O
7 MATRIX SPIKE O NA O M
8 MSA NA NA NA NA
9 SERIAL DILUTION O NA O O
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION O NA O O
11 OTHER QC O NA O O
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT 0 NA 0 O
O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M = Data qualified due to major problems Z = Data unacceptable X = Problems but do not affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN XDETECTION LIMITS WERE RAISED DUE TO BLANK CONTAMINATION M=R WAS OUTSIDE CRITERIA FOR CYANIDE ALL DATA ESTIMATED
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
Form INT3-18
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 26
REGION I Site Name Gallups Quarry Superfund Data Review Worksheets
REGION I REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TIER III VALIDATION LEVEL
The hardcopied Skinner and Sherman data package received at QSEA Inc has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data review included
Case No 23127 SAS No NA Sampling Date(s) 011295 SDG No MACZ38 Matrix Water Shipping Date(s) 011395 No of Samples 4 Met4 cy Date Recd by Lab 011695
Traffic Report Nos MMW fflKZ- 3ST PfUgfs- AUampP77 flMi 3 F
Trip Blank No None Equipment Blank No None Field Duplicate Nos MACZM AND MAGD77
SOW ILM030 requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
raquo Data Completeness raquo Field Duplicates raquo Holding Times raquo Lab Control Sample Results raquo Calibrations raquo ICP Serial Dilution Results Blanks raquo Detection Limit Results ICP Interference Check Results raquo Sample Quantitation raquo Matrix Spike Recoveries Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Comments Qualification required due to blanks and matrix spike only
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable Data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer steven J Lasky Date 040995
Form INT3-1
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 1
I
SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
DATA COMPLETENESS
MISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATA RECEIVED
None
FormlNTO-2
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 2
7 A Jvir- ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ QSL gt IftC
REC 5IONI Datlt Review Worksheets
11 HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and enter an X beside the analysis date for samples not within criteria
hg CYANIDE OTHERS SAMPLE ID DATE DATE DATE DATE pH ACTION
SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
CN=12 MACZ38 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGD77 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGZ28 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=25 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAEN08 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
METALS - 180 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimated (J) and non-detects
are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
FormMTI-3
OSEA Rte MA36F325WB2 - 3
V7~I l(s f^-r r-r rv n-r gtj QSEA2
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
III A IN JTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criter a
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
DATE ICWCCV ANALYTE R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
NONE
ACTIO NS
If any poundjnalyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
For Positive Results
Accept Estimate (J) toJlaquoet(R)
Metals 90-110R 75-89R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 20R 65-79R 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115R 70-84R 116-130R lt70R gt130R
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estimate (UJ) R^ct(IQ
Metals 90-1 25R 75-89R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 35R 65-79R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-1 30R 70-84R lt70R gt130R
FormWTS^
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 4
Cf7A lins ~~~~~ ~~^~ ^tjJ2 ri AfrC bull ~~~ ~~~~mdash ~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^~~^-^-^^
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence Mark One
a Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW Yes X No
b Were calibrations performed at the beginning of each analysis Yes X No
c Were calibration standards analyzed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency of ten percent or every two hours during analysis whichever is more frequent Yes X No
d Were the correlation coefficients for the calibration curves for AA Hg and CN gt= 0995 Yes X No
e Was the standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes X No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
Form (NTS-laquo
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 5
a INORGANIC INITIAL CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012695
ICPAnalyte COPPER Lab Value 1051
R = 5107 V 4860 100 1051 R
File Name NA Date of Initial Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1004
R 502 50 100 1004
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 1052
R 989 940 100 1052 R
Form INT3-SA
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 6
SEA Inc ~~~
INORGANIC CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name CCV1 Date of Continuing Calibration 012695
ICP Analyte IRON Lab Value 1008
R 100830 100000 100 1008 R
File Name NA Date of Continuing Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name CCV2 Date of Continuing Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1160
R 23 20 100 1160 R
File Name CCV3 Date of Continuing Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 988
R 1976 2000 100 988 R
FonnlNT3-9B
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 7
Q SEA 1m ^ bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANI-(ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List tht j blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat moratory Blanks
DATE
012695
012695
012695
012695
012695
IC8CC8 PREP BLANK ANALYTE
CCB1CCB3 PE IW Aluminum
CCB1 Antimony
ICBCCB1 Calcium
ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3(all) PE IW Copper
CCB1CCB3 PE SW Iron
CONC4laquon4
2563592565
-147
565966
185160841011178
86125560
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLANK ANALYTE CONCltUBL)
3 Fre quency Requirements
a Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matri for every 20 samples and for each digestion bate
x h Yes x No
b Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The j data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonriMn-C
OSEA filraquo MA38F325WB2 - 8
Q X- J [ sift S bull 4+++ gt^^^^^rf^-v-laquo^lti^ w ++ +++ r + + + ltgt^ ++ +-r+r+rtrrt (gt ++ ++ r++ bullbull r t r +r +++bull++ r U i JLf bullbullbullbullpound f-tSw
bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the 1 blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat gtoratory Blanks
-t)Ateuro- - KampCCB mEPBUWK ANALYTE CONCMagL)
012695 CCB3 PBW Sodium 6557173
012695 CCB1 Thallium 20
012695 ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3 (all) PBW Zinc 1679332-48320
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE ECWtP BLANK AJ1ALYTE CQHClugtL)
3 Fre quency Requir ements
a Was a prepare for every 20 s
)tion blank analyzed for each matrix amples and for each digestion batch Yes x No
b Was a calibral every 2 hours
ion blank run every 10 samples or whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonnlNT3-C
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 9
a CJ7jd Tlaquogt ~^^^^^~~~~~~^^^lt~~^^4~~^^~^^~~~^~~~ jJCtfLj I Tls ~~rr~rr
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
IV B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 4)
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five times the highest concentration of that elements contamination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
a When the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
b When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration unqualified
MATRIX Water MATRIX Water
ELEMENT MAXGONC (ugAJ jujiLr
ELEMENT MAX CONGJ AU
Aluminum 359 1795 Antimony -147 73 5
Calcium 966 483
Copper 185 925
Iron 125 625
Sodium 7173 35865
Thallium 2 10
Zinc 167 835
NO TE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to mgkg in order to compare them with the sample results
Cone in ugL X (Volume diluted to (200ml)Weight digested (1gram)) X (1L1 000ml) X (1000gm1kg) X(1mg1000ug) = mgkg
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
Form INT3-7
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 10
SEA IncshyREGION I Data Review Worksheets
V A ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 amp 2)
1 Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not meet the criteria for R
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
none
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample Results R J J Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8-hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FormWTM
QSEA File MA36F325WB2 - 11
Q SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ICS A solution gt 2xlDL that should not be present
Cone of kiterferents Element CONC Detected in the IC9 to the ICS
AL CA FE MG
Barium 14 514927 529351 190348 543610
Sodium 934 514927 529351 190348 543610
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the samples affected by interferences below
Sample Element Sample Merferant Estimated Affected Affected Sample Cone (ugL) Cone bullileffL
AIL CA FE MG (UBU
None
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of A) Ca Fe and Mg are less than 50 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 50 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
FormMT34
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 12
a ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-lnitial
ALUMINUM Lab Value 1004
ICSR 5095600 5077570 x 100 1004
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-Final
MAGNESIUM Lab Value 1018
ICSR 5435000 5336850 x 100 = 1018
Form INT3-9A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 13
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
bull Vos (Please Check)
pound77=
affic Report 25 ZrA Shippirgreceivirg Doc-^=ents
Airbill (No of Shipsents O3 Chiin-of-Custody Records US Sample Tags
Sasple Lag-In Sheet (Lab amp DC1) 04 us SDG Cover Sheet Ok
26 Kisc ShippingReceiving Records
(list all individual records)
Telephone Logs
iii 27 Intarral Lib Sasple Transfer Records amp
Tracking Sheets (describe or list) UA ill Od
CUMo OF
2S Ircsrral Origir^l Prep amp Ar^lysis Records
(describe or list)
Prep Records
Ar-alysis Records
Description STANDARDS rPE ICG
29 Other Records (describe or list)
Telephone Caerunicacion Lag ili ORIGINAL SHIPPING DCCLgtENTS rn_shy
DATA
Co=letad by (CL Lib) JOKMSCN
U5HPA DATA fflNAC-ZR (Print Na=e amp Tide) (DM)
For= DC-2 (continued) 390
DUALITY SPECIALISTS amp ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSTS INC J^^^^rytltty
Environmental Data Validation amp Interpretation
April 111995
Ms Christine Clark Regional Sample Control Coordinator US Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Services Division 60 Westview Street Lexington MA 02173-3185
Dear Ms Clark
RE Prime ContractSubcontract 68-W9-00331-636-999-QSEA Work Assignment 0163602301LB73 Case 23127 SDG MACZ38 Lab Name Skinner amp Sherman Site Name Gallups Quarry Superfund Site
A Tier III validation was performed on the inorganic analytical data from Case 23127 four samples collected by TRC Environmental Corporation at the Gallups Quarry Superfund site The data was evaluated based on the following parameters
data completeness holding times calibration
laboratory and field blank analyses matrix spike recoveries
laboratory and field duplicates laboratory control sample results furnace atomic absorption results serial dilution results detection limit results sample results
All criteria were met for this parameter
QSEA 30-1-776-04000403
PO Box 670 Dunbar West Virginia 25064 PhoneFax
Table 1 summarizes the validation recommendations which were based on the following information
- Laboratory and Field Blank Analyses
Blank detections are summarized below
ElementsAluminum
Maximum Concentration (ugL)
359
Action Level (ugL)
1795
Antimony Calcium Copper
Iron Sodium Thallium
Zinc
[
-147 OR a9DO
185 125
7173 2
167
735 483 925 625 3585
10 835
Value gt IDL and lt Action Level = Report value u Value gt IDL and gt Action Level = Report value unqualified
Batch results have been modified in accordance with the criteria above
Matrix Spike Recoveries
Matrix Spike R result was outside the criteria for cyanide All samples were flagged as estimated
Very truly yours
QSEA Inc
Steven J Lasky Inorganic Data Reviewer
SJLirs
cc EPA - Leslie McVickar
MA38RWPS Page 2 of 3 - TRC SDG MACZ38 Validation Report
Gallups Quarry Superfund Site Case MACZ38
Table I Recommendation Summary
Element Flag Element Flag Aluminum A1 Magnesium A Antimony A1 Manganese A
Arsenic A Mercury A
Barium A Nickel A
Beryllium A Potassium A
Cadmium A Selenium A
Calcium A Silver A
Chromium A Sodium A
Cobalt A Thallium A1
Copper A1 Vanadium A
Iron A Zinc A1
Lead A Cyanide J
DATA SUMMARY KEY
A - Accept all data
A1 - Accept data raise the sample detection limit(s) as needed due to blank contamination or report as unqualified
Estimate all positive values (J) and detection limits (UJ) due to low matrix spike recoveries These estimated results would be minimum values
MA38RWPS Page 3 of 3 - TRC SFXr 8MACZ38 Validation Report
TABLE MACZ38-A INORGANIC DATA SUMMARY TABLE
VALIDATED DATA FOR TRC ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION GALLUPS QUARRY SUPERFUND SITE
CASEfZ3127 SDG4MACZ38 LABORATORY SKINNER AND SHERMAN LABS INC
SAMPLE ID MACZ38 MAEN06 MAOP77 MAOZ2 SAMPLE LOCATION MW104TT TAXBOX-76 MW104TTD MW-112S LAB ID 01083415 01083-023 01083-038 4108344$ SAMPLE DATE 011295 011295 011295 01126 SAMPLE MATRIX WATER WATER WATER WATER DILUTION FACTOR 10 10 10 U SOLIDS NA NA NA NA
METHOD IDL CONC CONC CONC CONC CRDL CAS ANALYTE FPCVC UGL UGL Q UGL a UGL Q UGL Q UGL
742940-5 Aluminum P 183 569 U 183 U 710 U 492 200 7440-36-0 Antimony P 136 136 U 136 U 136 U 136 U 60 7440-38-2 Arsenic P 20 20 U 20 U 20 U 20 U 10 7440-39-3 Barium P 44 91 157 144 340 200 7440-41-7 Beryllium P 10 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 7440-43-9 Cadmium P 09 090 U 090 U 090 U 090 U 5 7440-70-2 Calcium P 458 11700 19200 11900 13000 5000 7440-47-3 Chromium P 36 36 U 36 U 36 U 106 10 7440-48-4 Cobalt P 16 16 U 16 U 16 U 16 U 60 7440-60-8 Copper P 23 118 U 135 U 34 U 68 U 25 743949-6 Iron P 50 690 306 I U 105 530 100 7439-92-1 Lead P 09 19 13 14 090 U 3 7439-95-4 Magnesium P 470 2110 2400 2220 2170 5000 7439-96-5 Manganese P 10 616 10 U 669 929 16 7439-97-6 Mercury CV 02 020 U 020 U 020 U 020 U 02 7440-02-0 Nickel P 39 39 U 39 U 39 U 39 U 40 7440-09-7 Potassium P 112 2880 2370 2870 1930 5000
7782-49-2 Selenium P 30 30 U 30 U 30 U 30 U 6 7440-22-4 Silver P 35 35 U 35 U 35 U 35 U 10 7440-23-5 Sodium P 543 5670 5490 5460 7520 5000 7440-28-0 Thallium P 18 18 U 18 U 18 U 18 U 10 7440-62-2 Vanadium P 30 30 U 30 U 30 U 30 U 90 7440-66-6 Zinc P 32 32 U 32 U 32 U 32 U 20 5955-70-0 Cyanide c 10 100 UJ 100 UJ 100 UJ 100 UJ 10
Analytical Method F = Furnace P = ICPFlame AA CV = Cold Vapor C Cotorimetric
QSEA File MA38M Page 1 of 1
QsEAlnc raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull-
Region i INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO 23127 SITE Qallups Quarry Superfund LABORATORY Skinner and Sherman labs NO OF SAMPLES
MATRIX 4 Met4 Cy Water SDG MACZ38 REVIEWER QSEA Inc SOW ILM030 REVIEWERS NAME Steven J Lasky DPO ACTION FYI X COMPLETION DATE 040995
bull bull bull bull - - -^^ - i^--^w - bull
1CP AA Ha CYAttDC
1 HOLDING TIMES 0 NA O O
2 CALIBRATIONS O NA O 0
3 BLANKS X NA O O
4 ICS O NA NA NA
6 LCS 0 NA O O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS O NA 0 O
7 MATRIX SPIKE O NA O M
8 MSA NA NA NA NA
9 SERIAL DILUTION O NA O O
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION O NA O O
11 OTHER QC O NA O O
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT 0 NA 0 O
O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M = Data qualified due to major problems Z = Data unacceptable X = Problems but do not affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN XDETECTION LIMITS WERE RAISED DUE TO BLANK CONTAMINATION M=R WAS OUTSIDE CRITERIA FOR CYANIDE ALL DATA ESTIMATED
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
Form INT3-18
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 26
REGION I Site Name Gallups Quarry Superfund Data Review Worksheets
REGION I REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TIER III VALIDATION LEVEL
The hardcopied Skinner and Sherman data package received at QSEA Inc has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data review included
Case No 23127 SAS No NA Sampling Date(s) 011295 SDG No MACZ38 Matrix Water Shipping Date(s) 011395 No of Samples 4 Met4 cy Date Recd by Lab 011695
Traffic Report Nos MMW fflKZ- 3ST PfUgfs- AUampP77 flMi 3 F
Trip Blank No None Equipment Blank No None Field Duplicate Nos MACZM AND MAGD77
SOW ILM030 requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
raquo Data Completeness raquo Field Duplicates raquo Holding Times raquo Lab Control Sample Results raquo Calibrations raquo ICP Serial Dilution Results Blanks raquo Detection Limit Results ICP Interference Check Results raquo Sample Quantitation raquo Matrix Spike Recoveries Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Comments Qualification required due to blanks and matrix spike only
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable Data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer steven J Lasky Date 040995
Form INT3-1
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 1
I
SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
DATA COMPLETENESS
MISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATA RECEIVED
None
FormlNTO-2
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 2
7 A Jvir- ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ QSL gt IftC
REC 5IONI Datlt Review Worksheets
11 HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and enter an X beside the analysis date for samples not within criteria
hg CYANIDE OTHERS SAMPLE ID DATE DATE DATE DATE pH ACTION
SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
CN=12 MACZ38 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGD77 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGZ28 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=25 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAEN08 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
METALS - 180 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimated (J) and non-detects
are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
FormMTI-3
OSEA Rte MA36F325WB2 - 3
V7~I l(s f^-r r-r rv n-r gtj QSEA2
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
III A IN JTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criter a
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
DATE ICWCCV ANALYTE R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
NONE
ACTIO NS
If any poundjnalyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
For Positive Results
Accept Estimate (J) toJlaquoet(R)
Metals 90-110R 75-89R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 20R 65-79R 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115R 70-84R 116-130R lt70R gt130R
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estimate (UJ) R^ct(IQ
Metals 90-1 25R 75-89R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 35R 65-79R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-1 30R 70-84R lt70R gt130R
FormWTS^
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 4
Cf7A lins ~~~~~ ~~^~ ^tjJ2 ri AfrC bull ~~~ ~~~~mdash ~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^~~^-^-^^
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence Mark One
a Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW Yes X No
b Were calibrations performed at the beginning of each analysis Yes X No
c Were calibration standards analyzed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency of ten percent or every two hours during analysis whichever is more frequent Yes X No
d Were the correlation coefficients for the calibration curves for AA Hg and CN gt= 0995 Yes X No
e Was the standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes X No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
Form (NTS-laquo
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 5
a INORGANIC INITIAL CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012695
ICPAnalyte COPPER Lab Value 1051
R = 5107 V 4860 100 1051 R
File Name NA Date of Initial Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1004
R 502 50 100 1004
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 1052
R 989 940 100 1052 R
Form INT3-SA
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 6
SEA Inc ~~~
INORGANIC CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name CCV1 Date of Continuing Calibration 012695
ICP Analyte IRON Lab Value 1008
R 100830 100000 100 1008 R
File Name NA Date of Continuing Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name CCV2 Date of Continuing Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1160
R 23 20 100 1160 R
File Name CCV3 Date of Continuing Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 988
R 1976 2000 100 988 R
FonnlNT3-9B
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 7
Q SEA 1m ^ bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANI-(ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List tht j blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat moratory Blanks
DATE
012695
012695
012695
012695
012695
IC8CC8 PREP BLANK ANALYTE
CCB1CCB3 PE IW Aluminum
CCB1 Antimony
ICBCCB1 Calcium
ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3(all) PE IW Copper
CCB1CCB3 PE SW Iron
CONC4laquon4
2563592565
-147
565966
185160841011178
86125560
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLANK ANALYTE CONCltUBL)
3 Fre quency Requirements
a Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matri for every 20 samples and for each digestion bate
x h Yes x No
b Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The j data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonriMn-C
OSEA filraquo MA38F325WB2 - 8
Q X- J [ sift S bull 4+++ gt^^^^^rf^-v-laquo^lti^ w ++ +++ r + + + ltgt^ ++ +-r+r+rtrrt (gt ++ ++ r++ bullbull r t r +r +++bull++ r U i JLf bullbullbullbullpound f-tSw
bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the 1 blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat gtoratory Blanks
-t)Ateuro- - KampCCB mEPBUWK ANALYTE CONCMagL)
012695 CCB3 PBW Sodium 6557173
012695 CCB1 Thallium 20
012695 ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3 (all) PBW Zinc 1679332-48320
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE ECWtP BLANK AJ1ALYTE CQHClugtL)
3 Fre quency Requir ements
a Was a prepare for every 20 s
)tion blank analyzed for each matrix amples and for each digestion batch Yes x No
b Was a calibral every 2 hours
ion blank run every 10 samples or whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonnlNT3-C
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 9
a CJ7jd Tlaquogt ~^^^^^~~~~~~^^^lt~~^^4~~^^~^^~~~^~~~ jJCtfLj I Tls ~~rr~rr
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
IV B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 4)
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five times the highest concentration of that elements contamination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
a When the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
b When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration unqualified
MATRIX Water MATRIX Water
ELEMENT MAXGONC (ugAJ jujiLr
ELEMENT MAX CONGJ AU
Aluminum 359 1795 Antimony -147 73 5
Calcium 966 483
Copper 185 925
Iron 125 625
Sodium 7173 35865
Thallium 2 10
Zinc 167 835
NO TE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to mgkg in order to compare them with the sample results
Cone in ugL X (Volume diluted to (200ml)Weight digested (1gram)) X (1L1 000ml) X (1000gm1kg) X(1mg1000ug) = mgkg
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
Form INT3-7
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 10
SEA IncshyREGION I Data Review Worksheets
V A ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 amp 2)
1 Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not meet the criteria for R
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
none
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample Results R J J Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8-hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FormWTM
QSEA File MA36F325WB2 - 11
Q SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ICS A solution gt 2xlDL that should not be present
Cone of kiterferents Element CONC Detected in the IC9 to the ICS
AL CA FE MG
Barium 14 514927 529351 190348 543610
Sodium 934 514927 529351 190348 543610
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the samples affected by interferences below
Sample Element Sample Merferant Estimated Affected Affected Sample Cone (ugL) Cone bullileffL
AIL CA FE MG (UBU
None
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of A) Ca Fe and Mg are less than 50 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 50 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
FormMT34
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 12
a ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-lnitial
ALUMINUM Lab Value 1004
ICSR 5095600 5077570 x 100 1004
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-Final
MAGNESIUM Lab Value 1018
ICSR 5435000 5336850 x 100 = 1018
Form INT3-9A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 13
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
DUALITY SPECIALISTS amp ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSTS INC J^^^^rytltty
Environmental Data Validation amp Interpretation
April 111995
Ms Christine Clark Regional Sample Control Coordinator US Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Services Division 60 Westview Street Lexington MA 02173-3185
Dear Ms Clark
RE Prime ContractSubcontract 68-W9-00331-636-999-QSEA Work Assignment 0163602301LB73 Case 23127 SDG MACZ38 Lab Name Skinner amp Sherman Site Name Gallups Quarry Superfund Site
A Tier III validation was performed on the inorganic analytical data from Case 23127 four samples collected by TRC Environmental Corporation at the Gallups Quarry Superfund site The data was evaluated based on the following parameters
data completeness holding times calibration
laboratory and field blank analyses matrix spike recoveries
laboratory and field duplicates laboratory control sample results furnace atomic absorption results serial dilution results detection limit results sample results
All criteria were met for this parameter
QSEA 30-1-776-04000403
PO Box 670 Dunbar West Virginia 25064 PhoneFax
Table 1 summarizes the validation recommendations which were based on the following information
- Laboratory and Field Blank Analyses
Blank detections are summarized below
ElementsAluminum
Maximum Concentration (ugL)
359
Action Level (ugL)
1795
Antimony Calcium Copper
Iron Sodium Thallium
Zinc
[
-147 OR a9DO
185 125
7173 2
167
735 483 925 625 3585
10 835
Value gt IDL and lt Action Level = Report value u Value gt IDL and gt Action Level = Report value unqualified
Batch results have been modified in accordance with the criteria above
Matrix Spike Recoveries
Matrix Spike R result was outside the criteria for cyanide All samples were flagged as estimated
Very truly yours
QSEA Inc
Steven J Lasky Inorganic Data Reviewer
SJLirs
cc EPA - Leslie McVickar
MA38RWPS Page 2 of 3 - TRC SDG MACZ38 Validation Report
Gallups Quarry Superfund Site Case MACZ38
Table I Recommendation Summary
Element Flag Element Flag Aluminum A1 Magnesium A Antimony A1 Manganese A
Arsenic A Mercury A
Barium A Nickel A
Beryllium A Potassium A
Cadmium A Selenium A
Calcium A Silver A
Chromium A Sodium A
Cobalt A Thallium A1
Copper A1 Vanadium A
Iron A Zinc A1
Lead A Cyanide J
DATA SUMMARY KEY
A - Accept all data
A1 - Accept data raise the sample detection limit(s) as needed due to blank contamination or report as unqualified
Estimate all positive values (J) and detection limits (UJ) due to low matrix spike recoveries These estimated results would be minimum values
MA38RWPS Page 3 of 3 - TRC SFXr 8MACZ38 Validation Report
TABLE MACZ38-A INORGANIC DATA SUMMARY TABLE
VALIDATED DATA FOR TRC ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION GALLUPS QUARRY SUPERFUND SITE
CASEfZ3127 SDG4MACZ38 LABORATORY SKINNER AND SHERMAN LABS INC
SAMPLE ID MACZ38 MAEN06 MAOP77 MAOZ2 SAMPLE LOCATION MW104TT TAXBOX-76 MW104TTD MW-112S LAB ID 01083415 01083-023 01083-038 4108344$ SAMPLE DATE 011295 011295 011295 01126 SAMPLE MATRIX WATER WATER WATER WATER DILUTION FACTOR 10 10 10 U SOLIDS NA NA NA NA
METHOD IDL CONC CONC CONC CONC CRDL CAS ANALYTE FPCVC UGL UGL Q UGL a UGL Q UGL Q UGL
742940-5 Aluminum P 183 569 U 183 U 710 U 492 200 7440-36-0 Antimony P 136 136 U 136 U 136 U 136 U 60 7440-38-2 Arsenic P 20 20 U 20 U 20 U 20 U 10 7440-39-3 Barium P 44 91 157 144 340 200 7440-41-7 Beryllium P 10 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 7440-43-9 Cadmium P 09 090 U 090 U 090 U 090 U 5 7440-70-2 Calcium P 458 11700 19200 11900 13000 5000 7440-47-3 Chromium P 36 36 U 36 U 36 U 106 10 7440-48-4 Cobalt P 16 16 U 16 U 16 U 16 U 60 7440-60-8 Copper P 23 118 U 135 U 34 U 68 U 25 743949-6 Iron P 50 690 306 I U 105 530 100 7439-92-1 Lead P 09 19 13 14 090 U 3 7439-95-4 Magnesium P 470 2110 2400 2220 2170 5000 7439-96-5 Manganese P 10 616 10 U 669 929 16 7439-97-6 Mercury CV 02 020 U 020 U 020 U 020 U 02 7440-02-0 Nickel P 39 39 U 39 U 39 U 39 U 40 7440-09-7 Potassium P 112 2880 2370 2870 1930 5000
7782-49-2 Selenium P 30 30 U 30 U 30 U 30 U 6 7440-22-4 Silver P 35 35 U 35 U 35 U 35 U 10 7440-23-5 Sodium P 543 5670 5490 5460 7520 5000 7440-28-0 Thallium P 18 18 U 18 U 18 U 18 U 10 7440-62-2 Vanadium P 30 30 U 30 U 30 U 30 U 90 7440-66-6 Zinc P 32 32 U 32 U 32 U 32 U 20 5955-70-0 Cyanide c 10 100 UJ 100 UJ 100 UJ 100 UJ 10
Analytical Method F = Furnace P = ICPFlame AA CV = Cold Vapor C Cotorimetric
QSEA File MA38M Page 1 of 1
QsEAlnc raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull-
Region i INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO 23127 SITE Qallups Quarry Superfund LABORATORY Skinner and Sherman labs NO OF SAMPLES
MATRIX 4 Met4 Cy Water SDG MACZ38 REVIEWER QSEA Inc SOW ILM030 REVIEWERS NAME Steven J Lasky DPO ACTION FYI X COMPLETION DATE 040995
bull bull bull bull - - -^^ - i^--^w - bull
1CP AA Ha CYAttDC
1 HOLDING TIMES 0 NA O O
2 CALIBRATIONS O NA O 0
3 BLANKS X NA O O
4 ICS O NA NA NA
6 LCS 0 NA O O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS O NA 0 O
7 MATRIX SPIKE O NA O M
8 MSA NA NA NA NA
9 SERIAL DILUTION O NA O O
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION O NA O O
11 OTHER QC O NA O O
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT 0 NA 0 O
O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M = Data qualified due to major problems Z = Data unacceptable X = Problems but do not affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN XDETECTION LIMITS WERE RAISED DUE TO BLANK CONTAMINATION M=R WAS OUTSIDE CRITERIA FOR CYANIDE ALL DATA ESTIMATED
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
Form INT3-18
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 26
REGION I Site Name Gallups Quarry Superfund Data Review Worksheets
REGION I REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TIER III VALIDATION LEVEL
The hardcopied Skinner and Sherman data package received at QSEA Inc has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data review included
Case No 23127 SAS No NA Sampling Date(s) 011295 SDG No MACZ38 Matrix Water Shipping Date(s) 011395 No of Samples 4 Met4 cy Date Recd by Lab 011695
Traffic Report Nos MMW fflKZ- 3ST PfUgfs- AUampP77 flMi 3 F
Trip Blank No None Equipment Blank No None Field Duplicate Nos MACZM AND MAGD77
SOW ILM030 requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
raquo Data Completeness raquo Field Duplicates raquo Holding Times raquo Lab Control Sample Results raquo Calibrations raquo ICP Serial Dilution Results Blanks raquo Detection Limit Results ICP Interference Check Results raquo Sample Quantitation raquo Matrix Spike Recoveries Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Comments Qualification required due to blanks and matrix spike only
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable Data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer steven J Lasky Date 040995
Form INT3-1
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 1
I
SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
DATA COMPLETENESS
MISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATA RECEIVED
None
FormlNTO-2
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 2
7 A Jvir- ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ QSL gt IftC
REC 5IONI Datlt Review Worksheets
11 HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and enter an X beside the analysis date for samples not within criteria
hg CYANIDE OTHERS SAMPLE ID DATE DATE DATE DATE pH ACTION
SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
CN=12 MACZ38 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGD77 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGZ28 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=25 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAEN08 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
METALS - 180 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimated (J) and non-detects
are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
FormMTI-3
OSEA Rte MA36F325WB2 - 3
V7~I l(s f^-r r-r rv n-r gtj QSEA2
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
III A IN JTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criter a
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
DATE ICWCCV ANALYTE R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
NONE
ACTIO NS
If any poundjnalyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
For Positive Results
Accept Estimate (J) toJlaquoet(R)
Metals 90-110R 75-89R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 20R 65-79R 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115R 70-84R 116-130R lt70R gt130R
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estimate (UJ) R^ct(IQ
Metals 90-1 25R 75-89R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 35R 65-79R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-1 30R 70-84R lt70R gt130R
FormWTS^
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 4
Cf7A lins ~~~~~ ~~^~ ^tjJ2 ri AfrC bull ~~~ ~~~~mdash ~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^~~^-^-^^
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence Mark One
a Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW Yes X No
b Were calibrations performed at the beginning of each analysis Yes X No
c Were calibration standards analyzed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency of ten percent or every two hours during analysis whichever is more frequent Yes X No
d Were the correlation coefficients for the calibration curves for AA Hg and CN gt= 0995 Yes X No
e Was the standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes X No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
Form (NTS-laquo
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 5
a INORGANIC INITIAL CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012695
ICPAnalyte COPPER Lab Value 1051
R = 5107 V 4860 100 1051 R
File Name NA Date of Initial Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1004
R 502 50 100 1004
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 1052
R 989 940 100 1052 R
Form INT3-SA
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 6
SEA Inc ~~~
INORGANIC CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name CCV1 Date of Continuing Calibration 012695
ICP Analyte IRON Lab Value 1008
R 100830 100000 100 1008 R
File Name NA Date of Continuing Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name CCV2 Date of Continuing Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1160
R 23 20 100 1160 R
File Name CCV3 Date of Continuing Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 988
R 1976 2000 100 988 R
FonnlNT3-9B
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 7
Q SEA 1m ^ bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANI-(ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List tht j blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat moratory Blanks
DATE
012695
012695
012695
012695
012695
IC8CC8 PREP BLANK ANALYTE
CCB1CCB3 PE IW Aluminum
CCB1 Antimony
ICBCCB1 Calcium
ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3(all) PE IW Copper
CCB1CCB3 PE SW Iron
CONC4laquon4
2563592565
-147
565966
185160841011178
86125560
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLANK ANALYTE CONCltUBL)
3 Fre quency Requirements
a Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matri for every 20 samples and for each digestion bate
x h Yes x No
b Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The j data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonriMn-C
OSEA filraquo MA38F325WB2 - 8
Q X- J [ sift S bull 4+++ gt^^^^^rf^-v-laquo^lti^ w ++ +++ r + + + ltgt^ ++ +-r+r+rtrrt (gt ++ ++ r++ bullbull r t r +r +++bull++ r U i JLf bullbullbullbullpound f-tSw
bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the 1 blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat gtoratory Blanks
-t)Ateuro- - KampCCB mEPBUWK ANALYTE CONCMagL)
012695 CCB3 PBW Sodium 6557173
012695 CCB1 Thallium 20
012695 ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3 (all) PBW Zinc 1679332-48320
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE ECWtP BLANK AJ1ALYTE CQHClugtL)
3 Fre quency Requir ements
a Was a prepare for every 20 s
)tion blank analyzed for each matrix amples and for each digestion batch Yes x No
b Was a calibral every 2 hours
ion blank run every 10 samples or whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonnlNT3-C
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 9
a CJ7jd Tlaquogt ~^^^^^~~~~~~^^^lt~~^^4~~^^~^^~~~^~~~ jJCtfLj I Tls ~~rr~rr
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
IV B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 4)
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five times the highest concentration of that elements contamination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
a When the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
b When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration unqualified
MATRIX Water MATRIX Water
ELEMENT MAXGONC (ugAJ jujiLr
ELEMENT MAX CONGJ AU
Aluminum 359 1795 Antimony -147 73 5
Calcium 966 483
Copper 185 925
Iron 125 625
Sodium 7173 35865
Thallium 2 10
Zinc 167 835
NO TE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to mgkg in order to compare them with the sample results
Cone in ugL X (Volume diluted to (200ml)Weight digested (1gram)) X (1L1 000ml) X (1000gm1kg) X(1mg1000ug) = mgkg
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
Form INT3-7
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 10
SEA IncshyREGION I Data Review Worksheets
V A ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 amp 2)
1 Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not meet the criteria for R
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
none
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample Results R J J Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8-hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FormWTM
QSEA File MA36F325WB2 - 11
Q SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ICS A solution gt 2xlDL that should not be present
Cone of kiterferents Element CONC Detected in the IC9 to the ICS
AL CA FE MG
Barium 14 514927 529351 190348 543610
Sodium 934 514927 529351 190348 543610
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the samples affected by interferences below
Sample Element Sample Merferant Estimated Affected Affected Sample Cone (ugL) Cone bullileffL
AIL CA FE MG (UBU
None
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of A) Ca Fe and Mg are less than 50 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 50 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
FormMT34
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 12
a ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-lnitial
ALUMINUM Lab Value 1004
ICSR 5095600 5077570 x 100 1004
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-Final
MAGNESIUM Lab Value 1018
ICSR 5435000 5336850 x 100 = 1018
Form INT3-9A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 13
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
Table 1 summarizes the validation recommendations which were based on the following information
- Laboratory and Field Blank Analyses
Blank detections are summarized below
ElementsAluminum
Maximum Concentration (ugL)
359
Action Level (ugL)
1795
Antimony Calcium Copper
Iron Sodium Thallium
Zinc
[
-147 OR a9DO
185 125
7173 2
167
735 483 925 625 3585
10 835
Value gt IDL and lt Action Level = Report value u Value gt IDL and gt Action Level = Report value unqualified
Batch results have been modified in accordance with the criteria above
Matrix Spike Recoveries
Matrix Spike R result was outside the criteria for cyanide All samples were flagged as estimated
Very truly yours
QSEA Inc
Steven J Lasky Inorganic Data Reviewer
SJLirs
cc EPA - Leslie McVickar
MA38RWPS Page 2 of 3 - TRC SDG MACZ38 Validation Report
Gallups Quarry Superfund Site Case MACZ38
Table I Recommendation Summary
Element Flag Element Flag Aluminum A1 Magnesium A Antimony A1 Manganese A
Arsenic A Mercury A
Barium A Nickel A
Beryllium A Potassium A
Cadmium A Selenium A
Calcium A Silver A
Chromium A Sodium A
Cobalt A Thallium A1
Copper A1 Vanadium A
Iron A Zinc A1
Lead A Cyanide J
DATA SUMMARY KEY
A - Accept all data
A1 - Accept data raise the sample detection limit(s) as needed due to blank contamination or report as unqualified
Estimate all positive values (J) and detection limits (UJ) due to low matrix spike recoveries These estimated results would be minimum values
MA38RWPS Page 3 of 3 - TRC SFXr 8MACZ38 Validation Report
TABLE MACZ38-A INORGANIC DATA SUMMARY TABLE
VALIDATED DATA FOR TRC ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION GALLUPS QUARRY SUPERFUND SITE
CASEfZ3127 SDG4MACZ38 LABORATORY SKINNER AND SHERMAN LABS INC
SAMPLE ID MACZ38 MAEN06 MAOP77 MAOZ2 SAMPLE LOCATION MW104TT TAXBOX-76 MW104TTD MW-112S LAB ID 01083415 01083-023 01083-038 4108344$ SAMPLE DATE 011295 011295 011295 01126 SAMPLE MATRIX WATER WATER WATER WATER DILUTION FACTOR 10 10 10 U SOLIDS NA NA NA NA
METHOD IDL CONC CONC CONC CONC CRDL CAS ANALYTE FPCVC UGL UGL Q UGL a UGL Q UGL Q UGL
742940-5 Aluminum P 183 569 U 183 U 710 U 492 200 7440-36-0 Antimony P 136 136 U 136 U 136 U 136 U 60 7440-38-2 Arsenic P 20 20 U 20 U 20 U 20 U 10 7440-39-3 Barium P 44 91 157 144 340 200 7440-41-7 Beryllium P 10 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 7440-43-9 Cadmium P 09 090 U 090 U 090 U 090 U 5 7440-70-2 Calcium P 458 11700 19200 11900 13000 5000 7440-47-3 Chromium P 36 36 U 36 U 36 U 106 10 7440-48-4 Cobalt P 16 16 U 16 U 16 U 16 U 60 7440-60-8 Copper P 23 118 U 135 U 34 U 68 U 25 743949-6 Iron P 50 690 306 I U 105 530 100 7439-92-1 Lead P 09 19 13 14 090 U 3 7439-95-4 Magnesium P 470 2110 2400 2220 2170 5000 7439-96-5 Manganese P 10 616 10 U 669 929 16 7439-97-6 Mercury CV 02 020 U 020 U 020 U 020 U 02 7440-02-0 Nickel P 39 39 U 39 U 39 U 39 U 40 7440-09-7 Potassium P 112 2880 2370 2870 1930 5000
7782-49-2 Selenium P 30 30 U 30 U 30 U 30 U 6 7440-22-4 Silver P 35 35 U 35 U 35 U 35 U 10 7440-23-5 Sodium P 543 5670 5490 5460 7520 5000 7440-28-0 Thallium P 18 18 U 18 U 18 U 18 U 10 7440-62-2 Vanadium P 30 30 U 30 U 30 U 30 U 90 7440-66-6 Zinc P 32 32 U 32 U 32 U 32 U 20 5955-70-0 Cyanide c 10 100 UJ 100 UJ 100 UJ 100 UJ 10
Analytical Method F = Furnace P = ICPFlame AA CV = Cold Vapor C Cotorimetric
QSEA File MA38M Page 1 of 1
QsEAlnc raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull-
Region i INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO 23127 SITE Qallups Quarry Superfund LABORATORY Skinner and Sherman labs NO OF SAMPLES
MATRIX 4 Met4 Cy Water SDG MACZ38 REVIEWER QSEA Inc SOW ILM030 REVIEWERS NAME Steven J Lasky DPO ACTION FYI X COMPLETION DATE 040995
bull bull bull bull - - -^^ - i^--^w - bull
1CP AA Ha CYAttDC
1 HOLDING TIMES 0 NA O O
2 CALIBRATIONS O NA O 0
3 BLANKS X NA O O
4 ICS O NA NA NA
6 LCS 0 NA O O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS O NA 0 O
7 MATRIX SPIKE O NA O M
8 MSA NA NA NA NA
9 SERIAL DILUTION O NA O O
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION O NA O O
11 OTHER QC O NA O O
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT 0 NA 0 O
O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M = Data qualified due to major problems Z = Data unacceptable X = Problems but do not affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN XDETECTION LIMITS WERE RAISED DUE TO BLANK CONTAMINATION M=R WAS OUTSIDE CRITERIA FOR CYANIDE ALL DATA ESTIMATED
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
Form INT3-18
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 26
REGION I Site Name Gallups Quarry Superfund Data Review Worksheets
REGION I REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TIER III VALIDATION LEVEL
The hardcopied Skinner and Sherman data package received at QSEA Inc has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data review included
Case No 23127 SAS No NA Sampling Date(s) 011295 SDG No MACZ38 Matrix Water Shipping Date(s) 011395 No of Samples 4 Met4 cy Date Recd by Lab 011695
Traffic Report Nos MMW fflKZ- 3ST PfUgfs- AUampP77 flMi 3 F
Trip Blank No None Equipment Blank No None Field Duplicate Nos MACZM AND MAGD77
SOW ILM030 requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
raquo Data Completeness raquo Field Duplicates raquo Holding Times raquo Lab Control Sample Results raquo Calibrations raquo ICP Serial Dilution Results Blanks raquo Detection Limit Results ICP Interference Check Results raquo Sample Quantitation raquo Matrix Spike Recoveries Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Comments Qualification required due to blanks and matrix spike only
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable Data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer steven J Lasky Date 040995
Form INT3-1
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 1
I
SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
DATA COMPLETENESS
MISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATA RECEIVED
None
FormlNTO-2
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 2
7 A Jvir- ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ QSL gt IftC
REC 5IONI Datlt Review Worksheets
11 HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and enter an X beside the analysis date for samples not within criteria
hg CYANIDE OTHERS SAMPLE ID DATE DATE DATE DATE pH ACTION
SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
CN=12 MACZ38 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGD77 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGZ28 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=25 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAEN08 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
METALS - 180 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimated (J) and non-detects
are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
FormMTI-3
OSEA Rte MA36F325WB2 - 3
V7~I l(s f^-r r-r rv n-r gtj QSEA2
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
III A IN JTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criter a
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
DATE ICWCCV ANALYTE R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
NONE
ACTIO NS
If any poundjnalyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
For Positive Results
Accept Estimate (J) toJlaquoet(R)
Metals 90-110R 75-89R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 20R 65-79R 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115R 70-84R 116-130R lt70R gt130R
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estimate (UJ) R^ct(IQ
Metals 90-1 25R 75-89R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 35R 65-79R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-1 30R 70-84R lt70R gt130R
FormWTS^
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 4
Cf7A lins ~~~~~ ~~^~ ^tjJ2 ri AfrC bull ~~~ ~~~~mdash ~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^~~^-^-^^
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence Mark One
a Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW Yes X No
b Were calibrations performed at the beginning of each analysis Yes X No
c Were calibration standards analyzed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency of ten percent or every two hours during analysis whichever is more frequent Yes X No
d Were the correlation coefficients for the calibration curves for AA Hg and CN gt= 0995 Yes X No
e Was the standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes X No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
Form (NTS-laquo
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 5
a INORGANIC INITIAL CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012695
ICPAnalyte COPPER Lab Value 1051
R = 5107 V 4860 100 1051 R
File Name NA Date of Initial Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1004
R 502 50 100 1004
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 1052
R 989 940 100 1052 R
Form INT3-SA
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 6
SEA Inc ~~~
INORGANIC CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name CCV1 Date of Continuing Calibration 012695
ICP Analyte IRON Lab Value 1008
R 100830 100000 100 1008 R
File Name NA Date of Continuing Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name CCV2 Date of Continuing Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1160
R 23 20 100 1160 R
File Name CCV3 Date of Continuing Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 988
R 1976 2000 100 988 R
FonnlNT3-9B
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 7
Q SEA 1m ^ bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANI-(ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List tht j blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat moratory Blanks
DATE
012695
012695
012695
012695
012695
IC8CC8 PREP BLANK ANALYTE
CCB1CCB3 PE IW Aluminum
CCB1 Antimony
ICBCCB1 Calcium
ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3(all) PE IW Copper
CCB1CCB3 PE SW Iron
CONC4laquon4
2563592565
-147
565966
185160841011178
86125560
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLANK ANALYTE CONCltUBL)
3 Fre quency Requirements
a Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matri for every 20 samples and for each digestion bate
x h Yes x No
b Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The j data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonriMn-C
OSEA filraquo MA38F325WB2 - 8
Q X- J [ sift S bull 4+++ gt^^^^^rf^-v-laquo^lti^ w ++ +++ r + + + ltgt^ ++ +-r+r+rtrrt (gt ++ ++ r++ bullbull r t r +r +++bull++ r U i JLf bullbullbullbullpound f-tSw
bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the 1 blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat gtoratory Blanks
-t)Ateuro- - KampCCB mEPBUWK ANALYTE CONCMagL)
012695 CCB3 PBW Sodium 6557173
012695 CCB1 Thallium 20
012695 ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3 (all) PBW Zinc 1679332-48320
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE ECWtP BLANK AJ1ALYTE CQHClugtL)
3 Fre quency Requir ements
a Was a prepare for every 20 s
)tion blank analyzed for each matrix amples and for each digestion batch Yes x No
b Was a calibral every 2 hours
ion blank run every 10 samples or whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonnlNT3-C
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 9
a CJ7jd Tlaquogt ~^^^^^~~~~~~^^^lt~~^^4~~^^~^^~~~^~~~ jJCtfLj I Tls ~~rr~rr
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
IV B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 4)
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five times the highest concentration of that elements contamination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
a When the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
b When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration unqualified
MATRIX Water MATRIX Water
ELEMENT MAXGONC (ugAJ jujiLr
ELEMENT MAX CONGJ AU
Aluminum 359 1795 Antimony -147 73 5
Calcium 966 483
Copper 185 925
Iron 125 625
Sodium 7173 35865
Thallium 2 10
Zinc 167 835
NO TE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to mgkg in order to compare them with the sample results
Cone in ugL X (Volume diluted to (200ml)Weight digested (1gram)) X (1L1 000ml) X (1000gm1kg) X(1mg1000ug) = mgkg
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
Form INT3-7
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 10
SEA IncshyREGION I Data Review Worksheets
V A ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 amp 2)
1 Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not meet the criteria for R
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
none
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample Results R J J Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8-hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FormWTM
QSEA File MA36F325WB2 - 11
Q SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ICS A solution gt 2xlDL that should not be present
Cone of kiterferents Element CONC Detected in the IC9 to the ICS
AL CA FE MG
Barium 14 514927 529351 190348 543610
Sodium 934 514927 529351 190348 543610
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the samples affected by interferences below
Sample Element Sample Merferant Estimated Affected Affected Sample Cone (ugL) Cone bullileffL
AIL CA FE MG (UBU
None
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of A) Ca Fe and Mg are less than 50 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 50 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
FormMT34
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 12
a ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-lnitial
ALUMINUM Lab Value 1004
ICSR 5095600 5077570 x 100 1004
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-Final
MAGNESIUM Lab Value 1018
ICSR 5435000 5336850 x 100 = 1018
Form INT3-9A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 13
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
Gallups Quarry Superfund Site Case MACZ38
Table I Recommendation Summary
Element Flag Element Flag Aluminum A1 Magnesium A Antimony A1 Manganese A
Arsenic A Mercury A
Barium A Nickel A
Beryllium A Potassium A
Cadmium A Selenium A
Calcium A Silver A
Chromium A Sodium A
Cobalt A Thallium A1
Copper A1 Vanadium A
Iron A Zinc A1
Lead A Cyanide J
DATA SUMMARY KEY
A - Accept all data
A1 - Accept data raise the sample detection limit(s) as needed due to blank contamination or report as unqualified
Estimate all positive values (J) and detection limits (UJ) due to low matrix spike recoveries These estimated results would be minimum values
MA38RWPS Page 3 of 3 - TRC SFXr 8MACZ38 Validation Report
TABLE MACZ38-A INORGANIC DATA SUMMARY TABLE
VALIDATED DATA FOR TRC ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION GALLUPS QUARRY SUPERFUND SITE
CASEfZ3127 SDG4MACZ38 LABORATORY SKINNER AND SHERMAN LABS INC
SAMPLE ID MACZ38 MAEN06 MAOP77 MAOZ2 SAMPLE LOCATION MW104TT TAXBOX-76 MW104TTD MW-112S LAB ID 01083415 01083-023 01083-038 4108344$ SAMPLE DATE 011295 011295 011295 01126 SAMPLE MATRIX WATER WATER WATER WATER DILUTION FACTOR 10 10 10 U SOLIDS NA NA NA NA
METHOD IDL CONC CONC CONC CONC CRDL CAS ANALYTE FPCVC UGL UGL Q UGL a UGL Q UGL Q UGL
742940-5 Aluminum P 183 569 U 183 U 710 U 492 200 7440-36-0 Antimony P 136 136 U 136 U 136 U 136 U 60 7440-38-2 Arsenic P 20 20 U 20 U 20 U 20 U 10 7440-39-3 Barium P 44 91 157 144 340 200 7440-41-7 Beryllium P 10 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 7440-43-9 Cadmium P 09 090 U 090 U 090 U 090 U 5 7440-70-2 Calcium P 458 11700 19200 11900 13000 5000 7440-47-3 Chromium P 36 36 U 36 U 36 U 106 10 7440-48-4 Cobalt P 16 16 U 16 U 16 U 16 U 60 7440-60-8 Copper P 23 118 U 135 U 34 U 68 U 25 743949-6 Iron P 50 690 306 I U 105 530 100 7439-92-1 Lead P 09 19 13 14 090 U 3 7439-95-4 Magnesium P 470 2110 2400 2220 2170 5000 7439-96-5 Manganese P 10 616 10 U 669 929 16 7439-97-6 Mercury CV 02 020 U 020 U 020 U 020 U 02 7440-02-0 Nickel P 39 39 U 39 U 39 U 39 U 40 7440-09-7 Potassium P 112 2880 2370 2870 1930 5000
7782-49-2 Selenium P 30 30 U 30 U 30 U 30 U 6 7440-22-4 Silver P 35 35 U 35 U 35 U 35 U 10 7440-23-5 Sodium P 543 5670 5490 5460 7520 5000 7440-28-0 Thallium P 18 18 U 18 U 18 U 18 U 10 7440-62-2 Vanadium P 30 30 U 30 U 30 U 30 U 90 7440-66-6 Zinc P 32 32 U 32 U 32 U 32 U 20 5955-70-0 Cyanide c 10 100 UJ 100 UJ 100 UJ 100 UJ 10
Analytical Method F = Furnace P = ICPFlame AA CV = Cold Vapor C Cotorimetric
QSEA File MA38M Page 1 of 1
QsEAlnc raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull-
Region i INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO 23127 SITE Qallups Quarry Superfund LABORATORY Skinner and Sherman labs NO OF SAMPLES
MATRIX 4 Met4 Cy Water SDG MACZ38 REVIEWER QSEA Inc SOW ILM030 REVIEWERS NAME Steven J Lasky DPO ACTION FYI X COMPLETION DATE 040995
bull bull bull bull - - -^^ - i^--^w - bull
1CP AA Ha CYAttDC
1 HOLDING TIMES 0 NA O O
2 CALIBRATIONS O NA O 0
3 BLANKS X NA O O
4 ICS O NA NA NA
6 LCS 0 NA O O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS O NA 0 O
7 MATRIX SPIKE O NA O M
8 MSA NA NA NA NA
9 SERIAL DILUTION O NA O O
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION O NA O O
11 OTHER QC O NA O O
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT 0 NA 0 O
O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M = Data qualified due to major problems Z = Data unacceptable X = Problems but do not affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN XDETECTION LIMITS WERE RAISED DUE TO BLANK CONTAMINATION M=R WAS OUTSIDE CRITERIA FOR CYANIDE ALL DATA ESTIMATED
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
Form INT3-18
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 26
REGION I Site Name Gallups Quarry Superfund Data Review Worksheets
REGION I REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TIER III VALIDATION LEVEL
The hardcopied Skinner and Sherman data package received at QSEA Inc has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data review included
Case No 23127 SAS No NA Sampling Date(s) 011295 SDG No MACZ38 Matrix Water Shipping Date(s) 011395 No of Samples 4 Met4 cy Date Recd by Lab 011695
Traffic Report Nos MMW fflKZ- 3ST PfUgfs- AUampP77 flMi 3 F
Trip Blank No None Equipment Blank No None Field Duplicate Nos MACZM AND MAGD77
SOW ILM030 requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
raquo Data Completeness raquo Field Duplicates raquo Holding Times raquo Lab Control Sample Results raquo Calibrations raquo ICP Serial Dilution Results Blanks raquo Detection Limit Results ICP Interference Check Results raquo Sample Quantitation raquo Matrix Spike Recoveries Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Comments Qualification required due to blanks and matrix spike only
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable Data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer steven J Lasky Date 040995
Form INT3-1
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 1
I
SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
DATA COMPLETENESS
MISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATA RECEIVED
None
FormlNTO-2
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 2
7 A Jvir- ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ QSL gt IftC
REC 5IONI Datlt Review Worksheets
11 HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and enter an X beside the analysis date for samples not within criteria
hg CYANIDE OTHERS SAMPLE ID DATE DATE DATE DATE pH ACTION
SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
CN=12 MACZ38 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGD77 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGZ28 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=25 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAEN08 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
METALS - 180 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimated (J) and non-detects
are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
FormMTI-3
OSEA Rte MA36F325WB2 - 3
V7~I l(s f^-r r-r rv n-r gtj QSEA2
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
III A IN JTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criter a
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
DATE ICWCCV ANALYTE R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
NONE
ACTIO NS
If any poundjnalyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
For Positive Results
Accept Estimate (J) toJlaquoet(R)
Metals 90-110R 75-89R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 20R 65-79R 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115R 70-84R 116-130R lt70R gt130R
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estimate (UJ) R^ct(IQ
Metals 90-1 25R 75-89R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 35R 65-79R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-1 30R 70-84R lt70R gt130R
FormWTS^
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 4
Cf7A lins ~~~~~ ~~^~ ^tjJ2 ri AfrC bull ~~~ ~~~~mdash ~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^~~^-^-^^
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence Mark One
a Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW Yes X No
b Were calibrations performed at the beginning of each analysis Yes X No
c Were calibration standards analyzed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency of ten percent or every two hours during analysis whichever is more frequent Yes X No
d Were the correlation coefficients for the calibration curves for AA Hg and CN gt= 0995 Yes X No
e Was the standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes X No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
Form (NTS-laquo
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 5
a INORGANIC INITIAL CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012695
ICPAnalyte COPPER Lab Value 1051
R = 5107 V 4860 100 1051 R
File Name NA Date of Initial Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1004
R 502 50 100 1004
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 1052
R 989 940 100 1052 R
Form INT3-SA
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 6
SEA Inc ~~~
INORGANIC CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name CCV1 Date of Continuing Calibration 012695
ICP Analyte IRON Lab Value 1008
R 100830 100000 100 1008 R
File Name NA Date of Continuing Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name CCV2 Date of Continuing Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1160
R 23 20 100 1160 R
File Name CCV3 Date of Continuing Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 988
R 1976 2000 100 988 R
FonnlNT3-9B
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 7
Q SEA 1m ^ bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANI-(ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List tht j blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat moratory Blanks
DATE
012695
012695
012695
012695
012695
IC8CC8 PREP BLANK ANALYTE
CCB1CCB3 PE IW Aluminum
CCB1 Antimony
ICBCCB1 Calcium
ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3(all) PE IW Copper
CCB1CCB3 PE SW Iron
CONC4laquon4
2563592565
-147
565966
185160841011178
86125560
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLANK ANALYTE CONCltUBL)
3 Fre quency Requirements
a Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matri for every 20 samples and for each digestion bate
x h Yes x No
b Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The j data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonriMn-C
OSEA filraquo MA38F325WB2 - 8
Q X- J [ sift S bull 4+++ gt^^^^^rf^-v-laquo^lti^ w ++ +++ r + + + ltgt^ ++ +-r+r+rtrrt (gt ++ ++ r++ bullbull r t r +r +++bull++ r U i JLf bullbullbullbullpound f-tSw
bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the 1 blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat gtoratory Blanks
-t)Ateuro- - KampCCB mEPBUWK ANALYTE CONCMagL)
012695 CCB3 PBW Sodium 6557173
012695 CCB1 Thallium 20
012695 ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3 (all) PBW Zinc 1679332-48320
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE ECWtP BLANK AJ1ALYTE CQHClugtL)
3 Fre quency Requir ements
a Was a prepare for every 20 s
)tion blank analyzed for each matrix amples and for each digestion batch Yes x No
b Was a calibral every 2 hours
ion blank run every 10 samples or whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonnlNT3-C
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 9
a CJ7jd Tlaquogt ~^^^^^~~~~~~^^^lt~~^^4~~^^~^^~~~^~~~ jJCtfLj I Tls ~~rr~rr
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
IV B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 4)
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five times the highest concentration of that elements contamination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
a When the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
b When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration unqualified
MATRIX Water MATRIX Water
ELEMENT MAXGONC (ugAJ jujiLr
ELEMENT MAX CONGJ AU
Aluminum 359 1795 Antimony -147 73 5
Calcium 966 483
Copper 185 925
Iron 125 625
Sodium 7173 35865
Thallium 2 10
Zinc 167 835
NO TE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to mgkg in order to compare them with the sample results
Cone in ugL X (Volume diluted to (200ml)Weight digested (1gram)) X (1L1 000ml) X (1000gm1kg) X(1mg1000ug) = mgkg
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
Form INT3-7
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 10
SEA IncshyREGION I Data Review Worksheets
V A ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 amp 2)
1 Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not meet the criteria for R
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
none
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample Results R J J Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8-hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FormWTM
QSEA File MA36F325WB2 - 11
Q SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ICS A solution gt 2xlDL that should not be present
Cone of kiterferents Element CONC Detected in the IC9 to the ICS
AL CA FE MG
Barium 14 514927 529351 190348 543610
Sodium 934 514927 529351 190348 543610
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the samples affected by interferences below
Sample Element Sample Merferant Estimated Affected Affected Sample Cone (ugL) Cone bullileffL
AIL CA FE MG (UBU
None
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of A) Ca Fe and Mg are less than 50 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 50 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
FormMT34
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 12
a ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-lnitial
ALUMINUM Lab Value 1004
ICSR 5095600 5077570 x 100 1004
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-Final
MAGNESIUM Lab Value 1018
ICSR 5435000 5336850 x 100 = 1018
Form INT3-9A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 13
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
TABLE MACZ38-A INORGANIC DATA SUMMARY TABLE
VALIDATED DATA FOR TRC ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION GALLUPS QUARRY SUPERFUND SITE
CASEfZ3127 SDG4MACZ38 LABORATORY SKINNER AND SHERMAN LABS INC
SAMPLE ID MACZ38 MAEN06 MAOP77 MAOZ2 SAMPLE LOCATION MW104TT TAXBOX-76 MW104TTD MW-112S LAB ID 01083415 01083-023 01083-038 4108344$ SAMPLE DATE 011295 011295 011295 01126 SAMPLE MATRIX WATER WATER WATER WATER DILUTION FACTOR 10 10 10 U SOLIDS NA NA NA NA
METHOD IDL CONC CONC CONC CONC CRDL CAS ANALYTE FPCVC UGL UGL Q UGL a UGL Q UGL Q UGL
742940-5 Aluminum P 183 569 U 183 U 710 U 492 200 7440-36-0 Antimony P 136 136 U 136 U 136 U 136 U 60 7440-38-2 Arsenic P 20 20 U 20 U 20 U 20 U 10 7440-39-3 Barium P 44 91 157 144 340 200 7440-41-7 Beryllium P 10 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 7440-43-9 Cadmium P 09 090 U 090 U 090 U 090 U 5 7440-70-2 Calcium P 458 11700 19200 11900 13000 5000 7440-47-3 Chromium P 36 36 U 36 U 36 U 106 10 7440-48-4 Cobalt P 16 16 U 16 U 16 U 16 U 60 7440-60-8 Copper P 23 118 U 135 U 34 U 68 U 25 743949-6 Iron P 50 690 306 I U 105 530 100 7439-92-1 Lead P 09 19 13 14 090 U 3 7439-95-4 Magnesium P 470 2110 2400 2220 2170 5000 7439-96-5 Manganese P 10 616 10 U 669 929 16 7439-97-6 Mercury CV 02 020 U 020 U 020 U 020 U 02 7440-02-0 Nickel P 39 39 U 39 U 39 U 39 U 40 7440-09-7 Potassium P 112 2880 2370 2870 1930 5000
7782-49-2 Selenium P 30 30 U 30 U 30 U 30 U 6 7440-22-4 Silver P 35 35 U 35 U 35 U 35 U 10 7440-23-5 Sodium P 543 5670 5490 5460 7520 5000 7440-28-0 Thallium P 18 18 U 18 U 18 U 18 U 10 7440-62-2 Vanadium P 30 30 U 30 U 30 U 30 U 90 7440-66-6 Zinc P 32 32 U 32 U 32 U 32 U 20 5955-70-0 Cyanide c 10 100 UJ 100 UJ 100 UJ 100 UJ 10
Analytical Method F = Furnace P = ICPFlame AA CV = Cold Vapor C Cotorimetric
QSEA File MA38M Page 1 of 1
QsEAlnc raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull-
Region i INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO 23127 SITE Qallups Quarry Superfund LABORATORY Skinner and Sherman labs NO OF SAMPLES
MATRIX 4 Met4 Cy Water SDG MACZ38 REVIEWER QSEA Inc SOW ILM030 REVIEWERS NAME Steven J Lasky DPO ACTION FYI X COMPLETION DATE 040995
bull bull bull bull - - -^^ - i^--^w - bull
1CP AA Ha CYAttDC
1 HOLDING TIMES 0 NA O O
2 CALIBRATIONS O NA O 0
3 BLANKS X NA O O
4 ICS O NA NA NA
6 LCS 0 NA O O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS O NA 0 O
7 MATRIX SPIKE O NA O M
8 MSA NA NA NA NA
9 SERIAL DILUTION O NA O O
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION O NA O O
11 OTHER QC O NA O O
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT 0 NA 0 O
O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M = Data qualified due to major problems Z = Data unacceptable X = Problems but do not affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN XDETECTION LIMITS WERE RAISED DUE TO BLANK CONTAMINATION M=R WAS OUTSIDE CRITERIA FOR CYANIDE ALL DATA ESTIMATED
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
Form INT3-18
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 26
REGION I Site Name Gallups Quarry Superfund Data Review Worksheets
REGION I REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TIER III VALIDATION LEVEL
The hardcopied Skinner and Sherman data package received at QSEA Inc has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data review included
Case No 23127 SAS No NA Sampling Date(s) 011295 SDG No MACZ38 Matrix Water Shipping Date(s) 011395 No of Samples 4 Met4 cy Date Recd by Lab 011695
Traffic Report Nos MMW fflKZ- 3ST PfUgfs- AUampP77 flMi 3 F
Trip Blank No None Equipment Blank No None Field Duplicate Nos MACZM AND MAGD77
SOW ILM030 requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
raquo Data Completeness raquo Field Duplicates raquo Holding Times raquo Lab Control Sample Results raquo Calibrations raquo ICP Serial Dilution Results Blanks raquo Detection Limit Results ICP Interference Check Results raquo Sample Quantitation raquo Matrix Spike Recoveries Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Comments Qualification required due to blanks and matrix spike only
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable Data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer steven J Lasky Date 040995
Form INT3-1
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 1
I
SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
DATA COMPLETENESS
MISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATA RECEIVED
None
FormlNTO-2
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 2
7 A Jvir- ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ QSL gt IftC
REC 5IONI Datlt Review Worksheets
11 HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and enter an X beside the analysis date for samples not within criteria
hg CYANIDE OTHERS SAMPLE ID DATE DATE DATE DATE pH ACTION
SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
CN=12 MACZ38 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGD77 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGZ28 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=25 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAEN08 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
METALS - 180 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimated (J) and non-detects
are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
FormMTI-3
OSEA Rte MA36F325WB2 - 3
V7~I l(s f^-r r-r rv n-r gtj QSEA2
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
III A IN JTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criter a
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
DATE ICWCCV ANALYTE R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
NONE
ACTIO NS
If any poundjnalyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
For Positive Results
Accept Estimate (J) toJlaquoet(R)
Metals 90-110R 75-89R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 20R 65-79R 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115R 70-84R 116-130R lt70R gt130R
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estimate (UJ) R^ct(IQ
Metals 90-1 25R 75-89R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 35R 65-79R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-1 30R 70-84R lt70R gt130R
FormWTS^
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 4
Cf7A lins ~~~~~ ~~^~ ^tjJ2 ri AfrC bull ~~~ ~~~~mdash ~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^~~^-^-^^
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence Mark One
a Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW Yes X No
b Were calibrations performed at the beginning of each analysis Yes X No
c Were calibration standards analyzed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency of ten percent or every two hours during analysis whichever is more frequent Yes X No
d Were the correlation coefficients for the calibration curves for AA Hg and CN gt= 0995 Yes X No
e Was the standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes X No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
Form (NTS-laquo
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 5
a INORGANIC INITIAL CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012695
ICPAnalyte COPPER Lab Value 1051
R = 5107 V 4860 100 1051 R
File Name NA Date of Initial Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1004
R 502 50 100 1004
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 1052
R 989 940 100 1052 R
Form INT3-SA
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 6
SEA Inc ~~~
INORGANIC CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name CCV1 Date of Continuing Calibration 012695
ICP Analyte IRON Lab Value 1008
R 100830 100000 100 1008 R
File Name NA Date of Continuing Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name CCV2 Date of Continuing Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1160
R 23 20 100 1160 R
File Name CCV3 Date of Continuing Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 988
R 1976 2000 100 988 R
FonnlNT3-9B
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 7
Q SEA 1m ^ bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANI-(ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List tht j blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat moratory Blanks
DATE
012695
012695
012695
012695
012695
IC8CC8 PREP BLANK ANALYTE
CCB1CCB3 PE IW Aluminum
CCB1 Antimony
ICBCCB1 Calcium
ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3(all) PE IW Copper
CCB1CCB3 PE SW Iron
CONC4laquon4
2563592565
-147
565966
185160841011178
86125560
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLANK ANALYTE CONCltUBL)
3 Fre quency Requirements
a Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matri for every 20 samples and for each digestion bate
x h Yes x No
b Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The j data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonriMn-C
OSEA filraquo MA38F325WB2 - 8
Q X- J [ sift S bull 4+++ gt^^^^^rf^-v-laquo^lti^ w ++ +++ r + + + ltgt^ ++ +-r+r+rtrrt (gt ++ ++ r++ bullbull r t r +r +++bull++ r U i JLf bullbullbullbullpound f-tSw
bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the 1 blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat gtoratory Blanks
-t)Ateuro- - KampCCB mEPBUWK ANALYTE CONCMagL)
012695 CCB3 PBW Sodium 6557173
012695 CCB1 Thallium 20
012695 ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3 (all) PBW Zinc 1679332-48320
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE ECWtP BLANK AJ1ALYTE CQHClugtL)
3 Fre quency Requir ements
a Was a prepare for every 20 s
)tion blank analyzed for each matrix amples and for each digestion batch Yes x No
b Was a calibral every 2 hours
ion blank run every 10 samples or whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonnlNT3-C
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 9
a CJ7jd Tlaquogt ~^^^^^~~~~~~^^^lt~~^^4~~^^~^^~~~^~~~ jJCtfLj I Tls ~~rr~rr
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
IV B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 4)
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five times the highest concentration of that elements contamination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
a When the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
b When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration unqualified
MATRIX Water MATRIX Water
ELEMENT MAXGONC (ugAJ jujiLr
ELEMENT MAX CONGJ AU
Aluminum 359 1795 Antimony -147 73 5
Calcium 966 483
Copper 185 925
Iron 125 625
Sodium 7173 35865
Thallium 2 10
Zinc 167 835
NO TE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to mgkg in order to compare them with the sample results
Cone in ugL X (Volume diluted to (200ml)Weight digested (1gram)) X (1L1 000ml) X (1000gm1kg) X(1mg1000ug) = mgkg
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
Form INT3-7
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 10
SEA IncshyREGION I Data Review Worksheets
V A ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 amp 2)
1 Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not meet the criteria for R
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
none
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample Results R J J Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8-hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FormWTM
QSEA File MA36F325WB2 - 11
Q SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ICS A solution gt 2xlDL that should not be present
Cone of kiterferents Element CONC Detected in the IC9 to the ICS
AL CA FE MG
Barium 14 514927 529351 190348 543610
Sodium 934 514927 529351 190348 543610
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the samples affected by interferences below
Sample Element Sample Merferant Estimated Affected Affected Sample Cone (ugL) Cone bullileffL
AIL CA FE MG (UBU
None
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of A) Ca Fe and Mg are less than 50 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 50 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
FormMT34
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 12
a ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-lnitial
ALUMINUM Lab Value 1004
ICSR 5095600 5077570 x 100 1004
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-Final
MAGNESIUM Lab Value 1018
ICSR 5435000 5336850 x 100 = 1018
Form INT3-9A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 13
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
QsEAlnc raquo bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull-
Region i INORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO 23127 SITE Qallups Quarry Superfund LABORATORY Skinner and Sherman labs NO OF SAMPLES
MATRIX 4 Met4 Cy Water SDG MACZ38 REVIEWER QSEA Inc SOW ILM030 REVIEWERS NAME Steven J Lasky DPO ACTION FYI X COMPLETION DATE 040995
bull bull bull bull - - -^^ - i^--^w - bull
1CP AA Ha CYAttDC
1 HOLDING TIMES 0 NA O O
2 CALIBRATIONS O NA O 0
3 BLANKS X NA O O
4 ICS O NA NA NA
6 LCS 0 NA O O
6 DUPLICATE ANALYSIS O NA 0 O
7 MATRIX SPIKE O NA O M
8 MSA NA NA NA NA
9 SERIAL DILUTION O NA O O
10 SAMPLE VERIFICATION O NA O O
11 OTHER QC O NA O O
12 OVERALL ASSESSMENT 0 NA 0 O
O = Data had no problemsor qualified due to minor problems M = Data qualified due to major problems Z = Data unacceptable X = Problems but do not affect data
ACTION ITEMS
AREAS OF CONCERN XDETECTION LIMITS WERE RAISED DUE TO BLANK CONTAMINATION M=R WAS OUTSIDE CRITERIA FOR CYANIDE ALL DATA ESTIMATED
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE
Form INT3-18
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 26
REGION I Site Name Gallups Quarry Superfund Data Review Worksheets
REGION I REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TIER III VALIDATION LEVEL
The hardcopied Skinner and Sherman data package received at QSEA Inc has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data review included
Case No 23127 SAS No NA Sampling Date(s) 011295 SDG No MACZ38 Matrix Water Shipping Date(s) 011395 No of Samples 4 Met4 cy Date Recd by Lab 011695
Traffic Report Nos MMW fflKZ- 3ST PfUgfs- AUampP77 flMi 3 F
Trip Blank No None Equipment Blank No None Field Duplicate Nos MACZM AND MAGD77
SOW ILM030 requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
raquo Data Completeness raquo Field Duplicates raquo Holding Times raquo Lab Control Sample Results raquo Calibrations raquo ICP Serial Dilution Results Blanks raquo Detection Limit Results ICP Interference Check Results raquo Sample Quantitation raquo Matrix Spike Recoveries Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Comments Qualification required due to blanks and matrix spike only
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable Data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer steven J Lasky Date 040995
Form INT3-1
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 1
I
SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
DATA COMPLETENESS
MISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATA RECEIVED
None
FormlNTO-2
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 2
7 A Jvir- ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ QSL gt IftC
REC 5IONI Datlt Review Worksheets
11 HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and enter an X beside the analysis date for samples not within criteria
hg CYANIDE OTHERS SAMPLE ID DATE DATE DATE DATE pH ACTION
SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
CN=12 MACZ38 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGD77 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGZ28 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=25 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAEN08 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
METALS - 180 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimated (J) and non-detects
are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
FormMTI-3
OSEA Rte MA36F325WB2 - 3
V7~I l(s f^-r r-r rv n-r gtj QSEA2
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
III A IN JTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criter a
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
DATE ICWCCV ANALYTE R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
NONE
ACTIO NS
If any poundjnalyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
For Positive Results
Accept Estimate (J) toJlaquoet(R)
Metals 90-110R 75-89R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 20R 65-79R 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115R 70-84R 116-130R lt70R gt130R
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estimate (UJ) R^ct(IQ
Metals 90-1 25R 75-89R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 35R 65-79R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-1 30R 70-84R lt70R gt130R
FormWTS^
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 4
Cf7A lins ~~~~~ ~~^~ ^tjJ2 ri AfrC bull ~~~ ~~~~mdash ~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^~~^-^-^^
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence Mark One
a Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW Yes X No
b Were calibrations performed at the beginning of each analysis Yes X No
c Were calibration standards analyzed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency of ten percent or every two hours during analysis whichever is more frequent Yes X No
d Were the correlation coefficients for the calibration curves for AA Hg and CN gt= 0995 Yes X No
e Was the standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes X No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
Form (NTS-laquo
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 5
a INORGANIC INITIAL CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012695
ICPAnalyte COPPER Lab Value 1051
R = 5107 V 4860 100 1051 R
File Name NA Date of Initial Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1004
R 502 50 100 1004
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 1052
R 989 940 100 1052 R
Form INT3-SA
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 6
SEA Inc ~~~
INORGANIC CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name CCV1 Date of Continuing Calibration 012695
ICP Analyte IRON Lab Value 1008
R 100830 100000 100 1008 R
File Name NA Date of Continuing Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name CCV2 Date of Continuing Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1160
R 23 20 100 1160 R
File Name CCV3 Date of Continuing Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 988
R 1976 2000 100 988 R
FonnlNT3-9B
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 7
Q SEA 1m ^ bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANI-(ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List tht j blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat moratory Blanks
DATE
012695
012695
012695
012695
012695
IC8CC8 PREP BLANK ANALYTE
CCB1CCB3 PE IW Aluminum
CCB1 Antimony
ICBCCB1 Calcium
ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3(all) PE IW Copper
CCB1CCB3 PE SW Iron
CONC4laquon4
2563592565
-147
565966
185160841011178
86125560
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLANK ANALYTE CONCltUBL)
3 Fre quency Requirements
a Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matri for every 20 samples and for each digestion bate
x h Yes x No
b Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The j data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonriMn-C
OSEA filraquo MA38F325WB2 - 8
Q X- J [ sift S bull 4+++ gt^^^^^rf^-v-laquo^lti^ w ++ +++ r + + + ltgt^ ++ +-r+r+rtrrt (gt ++ ++ r++ bullbull r t r +r +++bull++ r U i JLf bullbullbullbullpound f-tSw
bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the 1 blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat gtoratory Blanks
-t)Ateuro- - KampCCB mEPBUWK ANALYTE CONCMagL)
012695 CCB3 PBW Sodium 6557173
012695 CCB1 Thallium 20
012695 ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3 (all) PBW Zinc 1679332-48320
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE ECWtP BLANK AJ1ALYTE CQHClugtL)
3 Fre quency Requir ements
a Was a prepare for every 20 s
)tion blank analyzed for each matrix amples and for each digestion batch Yes x No
b Was a calibral every 2 hours
ion blank run every 10 samples or whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonnlNT3-C
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 9
a CJ7jd Tlaquogt ~^^^^^~~~~~~^^^lt~~^^4~~^^~^^~~~^~~~ jJCtfLj I Tls ~~rr~rr
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
IV B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 4)
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five times the highest concentration of that elements contamination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
a When the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
b When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration unqualified
MATRIX Water MATRIX Water
ELEMENT MAXGONC (ugAJ jujiLr
ELEMENT MAX CONGJ AU
Aluminum 359 1795 Antimony -147 73 5
Calcium 966 483
Copper 185 925
Iron 125 625
Sodium 7173 35865
Thallium 2 10
Zinc 167 835
NO TE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to mgkg in order to compare them with the sample results
Cone in ugL X (Volume diluted to (200ml)Weight digested (1gram)) X (1L1 000ml) X (1000gm1kg) X(1mg1000ug) = mgkg
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
Form INT3-7
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 10
SEA IncshyREGION I Data Review Worksheets
V A ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 amp 2)
1 Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not meet the criteria for R
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
none
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample Results R J J Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8-hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FormWTM
QSEA File MA36F325WB2 - 11
Q SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ICS A solution gt 2xlDL that should not be present
Cone of kiterferents Element CONC Detected in the IC9 to the ICS
AL CA FE MG
Barium 14 514927 529351 190348 543610
Sodium 934 514927 529351 190348 543610
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the samples affected by interferences below
Sample Element Sample Merferant Estimated Affected Affected Sample Cone (ugL) Cone bullileffL
AIL CA FE MG (UBU
None
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of A) Ca Fe and Mg are less than 50 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 50 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
FormMT34
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 12
a ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-lnitial
ALUMINUM Lab Value 1004
ICSR 5095600 5077570 x 100 1004
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-Final
MAGNESIUM Lab Value 1018
ICSR 5435000 5336850 x 100 = 1018
Form INT3-9A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 13
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
REGION I Site Name Gallups Quarry Superfund Data Review Worksheets
REGION I REVIEW OF INORGANIC CONTRACT LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
TIER III VALIDATION LEVEL
The hardcopied Skinner and Sherman data package received at QSEA Inc has been reviewed and the quality assurance and performance data summarized The data review included
Case No 23127 SAS No NA Sampling Date(s) 011295 SDG No MACZ38 Matrix Water Shipping Date(s) 011395 No of Samples 4 Met4 cy Date Recd by Lab 011695
Traffic Report Nos MMW fflKZ- 3ST PfUgfs- AUampP77 flMi 3 F
Trip Blank No None Equipment Blank No None Field Duplicate Nos MACZM AND MAGD77
SOW ILM030 requires that specific analytical work be done and that associated reports be provided by the laboratory to the Regions EMSL-LV and SMO The general criteria used to determine the performance were based on an examination of
raquo Data Completeness raquo Field Duplicates raquo Holding Times raquo Lab Control Sample Results raquo Calibrations raquo ICP Serial Dilution Results Blanks raquo Detection Limit Results ICP Interference Check Results raquo Sample Quantitation raquo Matrix Spike Recoveries Laboratory Duplicates
Overall Comments Qualification required due to blanks and matrix spike only
Definitions and Qualifiers
A - Acceptable Data J - Approximate data due to quality control criteria R - Reject data due to quality control criteria U - Analyte not detected
Reviewer steven J Lasky Date 040995
Form INT3-1
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 1
I
SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
DATA COMPLETENESS
MISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATA RECEIVED
None
FormlNTO-2
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 2
7 A Jvir- ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ QSL gt IftC
REC 5IONI Datlt Review Worksheets
11 HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and enter an X beside the analysis date for samples not within criteria
hg CYANIDE OTHERS SAMPLE ID DATE DATE DATE DATE pH ACTION
SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
CN=12 MACZ38 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGD77 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGZ28 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=25 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAEN08 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
METALS - 180 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimated (J) and non-detects
are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
FormMTI-3
OSEA Rte MA36F325WB2 - 3
V7~I l(s f^-r r-r rv n-r gtj QSEA2
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
III A IN JTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criter a
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
DATE ICWCCV ANALYTE R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
NONE
ACTIO NS
If any poundjnalyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
For Positive Results
Accept Estimate (J) toJlaquoet(R)
Metals 90-110R 75-89R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 20R 65-79R 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115R 70-84R 116-130R lt70R gt130R
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estimate (UJ) R^ct(IQ
Metals 90-1 25R 75-89R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 35R 65-79R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-1 30R 70-84R lt70R gt130R
FormWTS^
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 4
Cf7A lins ~~~~~ ~~^~ ^tjJ2 ri AfrC bull ~~~ ~~~~mdash ~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^~~^-^-^^
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence Mark One
a Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW Yes X No
b Were calibrations performed at the beginning of each analysis Yes X No
c Were calibration standards analyzed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency of ten percent or every two hours during analysis whichever is more frequent Yes X No
d Were the correlation coefficients for the calibration curves for AA Hg and CN gt= 0995 Yes X No
e Was the standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes X No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
Form (NTS-laquo
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 5
a INORGANIC INITIAL CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012695
ICPAnalyte COPPER Lab Value 1051
R = 5107 V 4860 100 1051 R
File Name NA Date of Initial Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1004
R 502 50 100 1004
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 1052
R 989 940 100 1052 R
Form INT3-SA
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 6
SEA Inc ~~~
INORGANIC CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name CCV1 Date of Continuing Calibration 012695
ICP Analyte IRON Lab Value 1008
R 100830 100000 100 1008 R
File Name NA Date of Continuing Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name CCV2 Date of Continuing Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1160
R 23 20 100 1160 R
File Name CCV3 Date of Continuing Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 988
R 1976 2000 100 988 R
FonnlNT3-9B
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 7
Q SEA 1m ^ bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANI-(ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List tht j blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat moratory Blanks
DATE
012695
012695
012695
012695
012695
IC8CC8 PREP BLANK ANALYTE
CCB1CCB3 PE IW Aluminum
CCB1 Antimony
ICBCCB1 Calcium
ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3(all) PE IW Copper
CCB1CCB3 PE SW Iron
CONC4laquon4
2563592565
-147
565966
185160841011178
86125560
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLANK ANALYTE CONCltUBL)
3 Fre quency Requirements
a Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matri for every 20 samples and for each digestion bate
x h Yes x No
b Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The j data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonriMn-C
OSEA filraquo MA38F325WB2 - 8
Q X- J [ sift S bull 4+++ gt^^^^^rf^-v-laquo^lti^ w ++ +++ r + + + ltgt^ ++ +-r+r+rtrrt (gt ++ ++ r++ bullbull r t r +r +++bull++ r U i JLf bullbullbullbullpound f-tSw
bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the 1 blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat gtoratory Blanks
-t)Ateuro- - KampCCB mEPBUWK ANALYTE CONCMagL)
012695 CCB3 PBW Sodium 6557173
012695 CCB1 Thallium 20
012695 ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3 (all) PBW Zinc 1679332-48320
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE ECWtP BLANK AJ1ALYTE CQHClugtL)
3 Fre quency Requir ements
a Was a prepare for every 20 s
)tion blank analyzed for each matrix amples and for each digestion batch Yes x No
b Was a calibral every 2 hours
ion blank run every 10 samples or whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonnlNT3-C
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 9
a CJ7jd Tlaquogt ~^^^^^~~~~~~^^^lt~~^^4~~^^~^^~~~^~~~ jJCtfLj I Tls ~~rr~rr
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
IV B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 4)
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five times the highest concentration of that elements contamination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
a When the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
b When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration unqualified
MATRIX Water MATRIX Water
ELEMENT MAXGONC (ugAJ jujiLr
ELEMENT MAX CONGJ AU
Aluminum 359 1795 Antimony -147 73 5
Calcium 966 483
Copper 185 925
Iron 125 625
Sodium 7173 35865
Thallium 2 10
Zinc 167 835
NO TE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to mgkg in order to compare them with the sample results
Cone in ugL X (Volume diluted to (200ml)Weight digested (1gram)) X (1L1 000ml) X (1000gm1kg) X(1mg1000ug) = mgkg
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
Form INT3-7
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 10
SEA IncshyREGION I Data Review Worksheets
V A ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 amp 2)
1 Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not meet the criteria for R
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
none
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample Results R J J Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8-hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FormWTM
QSEA File MA36F325WB2 - 11
Q SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ICS A solution gt 2xlDL that should not be present
Cone of kiterferents Element CONC Detected in the IC9 to the ICS
AL CA FE MG
Barium 14 514927 529351 190348 543610
Sodium 934 514927 529351 190348 543610
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the samples affected by interferences below
Sample Element Sample Merferant Estimated Affected Affected Sample Cone (ugL) Cone bullileffL
AIL CA FE MG (UBU
None
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of A) Ca Fe and Mg are less than 50 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 50 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
FormMT34
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 12
a ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-lnitial
ALUMINUM Lab Value 1004
ICSR 5095600 5077570 x 100 1004
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-Final
MAGNESIUM Lab Value 1018
ICSR 5435000 5336850 x 100 = 1018
Form INT3-9A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 13
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
I
SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
DATA COMPLETENESS
MISSING INFORMATION DATE LAB CONTACTED DATA RECEIVED
None
FormlNTO-2
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 2
7 A Jvir- ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ QSL gt IftC
REC 5IONI Datlt Review Worksheets
11 HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and enter an X beside the analysis date for samples not within criteria
hg CYANIDE OTHERS SAMPLE ID DATE DATE DATE DATE pH ACTION
SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
CN=12 MACZ38 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGD77 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGZ28 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=25 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAEN08 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
METALS - 180 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimated (J) and non-detects
are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
FormMTI-3
OSEA Rte MA36F325WB2 - 3
V7~I l(s f^-r r-r rv n-r gtj QSEA2
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
III A IN JTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criter a
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
DATE ICWCCV ANALYTE R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
NONE
ACTIO NS
If any poundjnalyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
For Positive Results
Accept Estimate (J) toJlaquoet(R)
Metals 90-110R 75-89R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 20R 65-79R 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115R 70-84R 116-130R lt70R gt130R
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estimate (UJ) R^ct(IQ
Metals 90-1 25R 75-89R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 35R 65-79R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-1 30R 70-84R lt70R gt130R
FormWTS^
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 4
Cf7A lins ~~~~~ ~~^~ ^tjJ2 ri AfrC bull ~~~ ~~~~mdash ~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^~~^-^-^^
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence Mark One
a Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW Yes X No
b Were calibrations performed at the beginning of each analysis Yes X No
c Were calibration standards analyzed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency of ten percent or every two hours during analysis whichever is more frequent Yes X No
d Were the correlation coefficients for the calibration curves for AA Hg and CN gt= 0995 Yes X No
e Was the standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes X No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
Form (NTS-laquo
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 5
a INORGANIC INITIAL CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012695
ICPAnalyte COPPER Lab Value 1051
R = 5107 V 4860 100 1051 R
File Name NA Date of Initial Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1004
R 502 50 100 1004
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 1052
R 989 940 100 1052 R
Form INT3-SA
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 6
SEA Inc ~~~
INORGANIC CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name CCV1 Date of Continuing Calibration 012695
ICP Analyte IRON Lab Value 1008
R 100830 100000 100 1008 R
File Name NA Date of Continuing Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name CCV2 Date of Continuing Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1160
R 23 20 100 1160 R
File Name CCV3 Date of Continuing Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 988
R 1976 2000 100 988 R
FonnlNT3-9B
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 7
Q SEA 1m ^ bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANI-(ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List tht j blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat moratory Blanks
DATE
012695
012695
012695
012695
012695
IC8CC8 PREP BLANK ANALYTE
CCB1CCB3 PE IW Aluminum
CCB1 Antimony
ICBCCB1 Calcium
ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3(all) PE IW Copper
CCB1CCB3 PE SW Iron
CONC4laquon4
2563592565
-147
565966
185160841011178
86125560
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLANK ANALYTE CONCltUBL)
3 Fre quency Requirements
a Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matri for every 20 samples and for each digestion bate
x h Yes x No
b Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The j data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonriMn-C
OSEA filraquo MA38F325WB2 - 8
Q X- J [ sift S bull 4+++ gt^^^^^rf^-v-laquo^lti^ w ++ +++ r + + + ltgt^ ++ +-r+r+rtrrt (gt ++ ++ r++ bullbull r t r +r +++bull++ r U i JLf bullbullbullbullpound f-tSw
bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the 1 blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat gtoratory Blanks
-t)Ateuro- - KampCCB mEPBUWK ANALYTE CONCMagL)
012695 CCB3 PBW Sodium 6557173
012695 CCB1 Thallium 20
012695 ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3 (all) PBW Zinc 1679332-48320
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE ECWtP BLANK AJ1ALYTE CQHClugtL)
3 Fre quency Requir ements
a Was a prepare for every 20 s
)tion blank analyzed for each matrix amples and for each digestion batch Yes x No
b Was a calibral every 2 hours
ion blank run every 10 samples or whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonnlNT3-C
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 9
a CJ7jd Tlaquogt ~^^^^^~~~~~~^^^lt~~^^4~~^^~^^~~~^~~~ jJCtfLj I Tls ~~rr~rr
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
IV B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 4)
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five times the highest concentration of that elements contamination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
a When the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
b When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration unqualified
MATRIX Water MATRIX Water
ELEMENT MAXGONC (ugAJ jujiLr
ELEMENT MAX CONGJ AU
Aluminum 359 1795 Antimony -147 73 5
Calcium 966 483
Copper 185 925
Iron 125 625
Sodium 7173 35865
Thallium 2 10
Zinc 167 835
NO TE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to mgkg in order to compare them with the sample results
Cone in ugL X (Volume diluted to (200ml)Weight digested (1gram)) X (1L1 000ml) X (1000gm1kg) X(1mg1000ug) = mgkg
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
Form INT3-7
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 10
SEA IncshyREGION I Data Review Worksheets
V A ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 amp 2)
1 Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not meet the criteria for R
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
none
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample Results R J J Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8-hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FormWTM
QSEA File MA36F325WB2 - 11
Q SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ICS A solution gt 2xlDL that should not be present
Cone of kiterferents Element CONC Detected in the IC9 to the ICS
AL CA FE MG
Barium 14 514927 529351 190348 543610
Sodium 934 514927 529351 190348 543610
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the samples affected by interferences below
Sample Element Sample Merferant Estimated Affected Affected Sample Cone (ugL) Cone bullileffL
AIL CA FE MG (UBU
None
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of A) Ca Fe and Mg are less than 50 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 50 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
FormMT34
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 12
a ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-lnitial
ALUMINUM Lab Value 1004
ICSR 5095600 5077570 x 100 1004
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-Final
MAGNESIUM Lab Value 1018
ICSR 5435000 5336850 x 100 = 1018
Form INT3-9A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 13
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
7 A Jvir- ~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ QSL gt IftC
REC 5IONI Datlt Review Worksheets
11 HOLDING TIMES Complete table for all samples and enter an X beside the analysis date for samples not within criteria
hg CYANIDE OTHERS SAMPLE ID DATE DATE DATE DATE pH ACTION
SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
CN=12 MACZ38 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGD77 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAGZ28 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=25 ACCEPT
CN=12 MAEN08 011295 012395 011995 013195 Met=2 ACCEPT
METALS - 180 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION MERCURY - 28 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION CYANIDE - 14 DAYS FROM SAMPLE COLLECTION
ACTION 1 If holding times are exceeded all positive results are estimated (J) and non-detects
are estimated (UJ)
2 If holding times are grossly exceeded the reviewer may determine that non-detects are unusable (R)
FormMTI-3
OSEA Rte MA36F325WB2 - 3
V7~I l(s f^-r r-r rv n-r gtj QSEA2
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
III A IN JTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criter a
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
DATE ICWCCV ANALYTE R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
NONE
ACTIO NS
If any poundjnalyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
For Positive Results
Accept Estimate (J) toJlaquoet(R)
Metals 90-110R 75-89R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 20R 65-79R 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115R 70-84R 116-130R lt70R gt130R
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estimate (UJ) R^ct(IQ
Metals 90-1 25R 75-89R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 35R 65-79R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-1 30R 70-84R lt70R gt130R
FormWTS^
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 4
Cf7A lins ~~~~~ ~~^~ ^tjJ2 ri AfrC bull ~~~ ~~~~mdash ~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^~~^-^-^^
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence Mark One
a Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW Yes X No
b Were calibrations performed at the beginning of each analysis Yes X No
c Were calibration standards analyzed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency of ten percent or every two hours during analysis whichever is more frequent Yes X No
d Were the correlation coefficients for the calibration curves for AA Hg and CN gt= 0995 Yes X No
e Was the standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes X No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
Form (NTS-laquo
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 5
a INORGANIC INITIAL CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012695
ICPAnalyte COPPER Lab Value 1051
R = 5107 V 4860 100 1051 R
File Name NA Date of Initial Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1004
R 502 50 100 1004
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 1052
R 989 940 100 1052 R
Form INT3-SA
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 6
SEA Inc ~~~
INORGANIC CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name CCV1 Date of Continuing Calibration 012695
ICP Analyte IRON Lab Value 1008
R 100830 100000 100 1008 R
File Name NA Date of Continuing Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name CCV2 Date of Continuing Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1160
R 23 20 100 1160 R
File Name CCV3 Date of Continuing Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 988
R 1976 2000 100 988 R
FonnlNT3-9B
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 7
Q SEA 1m ^ bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANI-(ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List tht j blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat moratory Blanks
DATE
012695
012695
012695
012695
012695
IC8CC8 PREP BLANK ANALYTE
CCB1CCB3 PE IW Aluminum
CCB1 Antimony
ICBCCB1 Calcium
ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3(all) PE IW Copper
CCB1CCB3 PE SW Iron
CONC4laquon4
2563592565
-147
565966
185160841011178
86125560
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLANK ANALYTE CONCltUBL)
3 Fre quency Requirements
a Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matri for every 20 samples and for each digestion bate
x h Yes x No
b Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The j data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonriMn-C
OSEA filraquo MA38F325WB2 - 8
Q X- J [ sift S bull 4+++ gt^^^^^rf^-v-laquo^lti^ w ++ +++ r + + + ltgt^ ++ +-r+r+rtrrt (gt ++ ++ r++ bullbull r t r +r +++bull++ r U i JLf bullbullbullbullpound f-tSw
bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the 1 blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat gtoratory Blanks
-t)Ateuro- - KampCCB mEPBUWK ANALYTE CONCMagL)
012695 CCB3 PBW Sodium 6557173
012695 CCB1 Thallium 20
012695 ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3 (all) PBW Zinc 1679332-48320
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE ECWtP BLANK AJ1ALYTE CQHClugtL)
3 Fre quency Requir ements
a Was a prepare for every 20 s
)tion blank analyzed for each matrix amples and for each digestion batch Yes x No
b Was a calibral every 2 hours
ion blank run every 10 samples or whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonnlNT3-C
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 9
a CJ7jd Tlaquogt ~^^^^^~~~~~~^^^lt~~^^4~~^^~^^~~~^~~~ jJCtfLj I Tls ~~rr~rr
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
IV B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 4)
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five times the highest concentration of that elements contamination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
a When the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
b When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration unqualified
MATRIX Water MATRIX Water
ELEMENT MAXGONC (ugAJ jujiLr
ELEMENT MAX CONGJ AU
Aluminum 359 1795 Antimony -147 73 5
Calcium 966 483
Copper 185 925
Iron 125 625
Sodium 7173 35865
Thallium 2 10
Zinc 167 835
NO TE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to mgkg in order to compare them with the sample results
Cone in ugL X (Volume diluted to (200ml)Weight digested (1gram)) X (1L1 000ml) X (1000gm1kg) X(1mg1000ug) = mgkg
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
Form INT3-7
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 10
SEA IncshyREGION I Data Review Worksheets
V A ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 amp 2)
1 Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not meet the criteria for R
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
none
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample Results R J J Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8-hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FormWTM
QSEA File MA36F325WB2 - 11
Q SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ICS A solution gt 2xlDL that should not be present
Cone of kiterferents Element CONC Detected in the IC9 to the ICS
AL CA FE MG
Barium 14 514927 529351 190348 543610
Sodium 934 514927 529351 190348 543610
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the samples affected by interferences below
Sample Element Sample Merferant Estimated Affected Affected Sample Cone (ugL) Cone bullileffL
AIL CA FE MG (UBU
None
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of A) Ca Fe and Mg are less than 50 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 50 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
FormMT34
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 12
a ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-lnitial
ALUMINUM Lab Value 1004
ICSR 5095600 5077570 x 100 1004
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-Final
MAGNESIUM Lab Value 1018
ICSR 5435000 5336850 x 100 = 1018
Form INT3-9A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 13
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
V7~I l(s f^-r r-r rv n-r gtj QSEA2
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
III A IN JTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 1)
1 Recovery Criter a
List the analytes which did not meet the percent recovery (R) criteria for Initial or Continuing Calibration
DATE ICWCCV ANALYTE R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
NONE
ACTIO NS
If any poundjnalyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
For Positive Results
Accept Estimate (J) toJlaquoet(R)
Metals 90-110R 75-89R 111-125R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 20R 65-79R 121-135R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-115R 70-84R 116-130R lt70R gt130R
For Non-detected Results
Accept Estimate (UJ) R^ct(IQ
Metals 90-1 25R 75-89R lt75R gt125R Mercury 80-1 35R 65-79R lt65R gt135R Cyanide 85-1 30R 70-84R lt70R gt130R
FormWTS^
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 4
Cf7A lins ~~~~~ ~~^~ ^tjJ2 ri AfrC bull ~~~ ~~~~mdash ~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^~~^-^-^^
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence Mark One
a Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW Yes X No
b Were calibrations performed at the beginning of each analysis Yes X No
c Were calibration standards analyzed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency of ten percent or every two hours during analysis whichever is more frequent Yes X No
d Were the correlation coefficients for the calibration curves for AA Hg and CN gt= 0995 Yes X No
e Was the standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes X No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
Form (NTS-laquo
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 5
a INORGANIC INITIAL CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012695
ICPAnalyte COPPER Lab Value 1051
R = 5107 V 4860 100 1051 R
File Name NA Date of Initial Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1004
R 502 50 100 1004
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 1052
R 989 940 100 1052 R
Form INT3-SA
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 6
SEA Inc ~~~
INORGANIC CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name CCV1 Date of Continuing Calibration 012695
ICP Analyte IRON Lab Value 1008
R 100830 100000 100 1008 R
File Name NA Date of Continuing Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name CCV2 Date of Continuing Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1160
R 23 20 100 1160 R
File Name CCV3 Date of Continuing Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 988
R 1976 2000 100 988 R
FonnlNT3-9B
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 7
Q SEA 1m ^ bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANI-(ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List tht j blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat moratory Blanks
DATE
012695
012695
012695
012695
012695
IC8CC8 PREP BLANK ANALYTE
CCB1CCB3 PE IW Aluminum
CCB1 Antimony
ICBCCB1 Calcium
ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3(all) PE IW Copper
CCB1CCB3 PE SW Iron
CONC4laquon4
2563592565
-147
565966
185160841011178
86125560
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLANK ANALYTE CONCltUBL)
3 Fre quency Requirements
a Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matri for every 20 samples and for each digestion bate
x h Yes x No
b Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The j data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonriMn-C
OSEA filraquo MA38F325WB2 - 8
Q X- J [ sift S bull 4+++ gt^^^^^rf^-v-laquo^lti^ w ++ +++ r + + + ltgt^ ++ +-r+r+rtrrt (gt ++ ++ r++ bullbull r t r +r +++bull++ r U i JLf bullbullbullbullpound f-tSw
bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the 1 blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat gtoratory Blanks
-t)Ateuro- - KampCCB mEPBUWK ANALYTE CONCMagL)
012695 CCB3 PBW Sodium 6557173
012695 CCB1 Thallium 20
012695 ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3 (all) PBW Zinc 1679332-48320
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE ECWtP BLANK AJ1ALYTE CQHClugtL)
3 Fre quency Requir ements
a Was a prepare for every 20 s
)tion blank analyzed for each matrix amples and for each digestion batch Yes x No
b Was a calibral every 2 hours
ion blank run every 10 samples or whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonnlNT3-C
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 9
a CJ7jd Tlaquogt ~^^^^^~~~~~~^^^lt~~^^4~~^^~^^~~~^~~~ jJCtfLj I Tls ~~rr~rr
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
IV B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 4)
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five times the highest concentration of that elements contamination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
a When the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
b When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration unqualified
MATRIX Water MATRIX Water
ELEMENT MAXGONC (ugAJ jujiLr
ELEMENT MAX CONGJ AU
Aluminum 359 1795 Antimony -147 73 5
Calcium 966 483
Copper 185 925
Iron 125 625
Sodium 7173 35865
Thallium 2 10
Zinc 167 835
NO TE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to mgkg in order to compare them with the sample results
Cone in ugL X (Volume diluted to (200ml)Weight digested (1gram)) X (1L1 000ml) X (1000gm1kg) X(1mg1000ug) = mgkg
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
Form INT3-7
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 10
SEA IncshyREGION I Data Review Worksheets
V A ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 amp 2)
1 Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not meet the criteria for R
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
none
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample Results R J J Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8-hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FormWTM
QSEA File MA36F325WB2 - 11
Q SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ICS A solution gt 2xlDL that should not be present
Cone of kiterferents Element CONC Detected in the IC9 to the ICS
AL CA FE MG
Barium 14 514927 529351 190348 543610
Sodium 934 514927 529351 190348 543610
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the samples affected by interferences below
Sample Element Sample Merferant Estimated Affected Affected Sample Cone (ugL) Cone bullileffL
AIL CA FE MG (UBU
None
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of A) Ca Fe and Mg are less than 50 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 50 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
FormMT34
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 12
a ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-lnitial
ALUMINUM Lab Value 1004
ICSR 5095600 5077570 x 100 1004
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-Final
MAGNESIUM Lab Value 1018
ICSR 5435000 5336850 x 100 = 1018
Form INT3-9A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 13
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
Cf7A lins ~~~~~ ~~^~ ^tjJ2 ri AfrC bull ~~~ ~~~~mdash ~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^~~^-^-^^
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
III B INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION (Section 2)
2 Analytical Sequence Mark One
a Did the laboratory use the proper number of standards for calibration as described in the SOW Yes X No
b Were calibrations performed at the beginning of each analysis Yes X No
c Were calibration standards analyzed at the beginning of sample analysis and at a minimum frequency of ten percent or every two hours during analysis whichever is more frequent Yes X No
d Were the correlation coefficients for the calibration curves for AA Hg and CN gt= 0995 Yes X No
e Was the standard at 2xCRDL analyzed for all ICP analyses Yes X No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
Form (NTS-laquo
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 5
a INORGANIC INITIAL CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012695
ICPAnalyte COPPER Lab Value 1051
R = 5107 V 4860 100 1051 R
File Name NA Date of Initial Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1004
R 502 50 100 1004
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 1052
R 989 940 100 1052 R
Form INT3-SA
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 6
SEA Inc ~~~
INORGANIC CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name CCV1 Date of Continuing Calibration 012695
ICP Analyte IRON Lab Value 1008
R 100830 100000 100 1008 R
File Name NA Date of Continuing Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name CCV2 Date of Continuing Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1160
R 23 20 100 1160 R
File Name CCV3 Date of Continuing Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 988
R 1976 2000 100 988 R
FonnlNT3-9B
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 7
Q SEA 1m ^ bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANI-(ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List tht j blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat moratory Blanks
DATE
012695
012695
012695
012695
012695
IC8CC8 PREP BLANK ANALYTE
CCB1CCB3 PE IW Aluminum
CCB1 Antimony
ICBCCB1 Calcium
ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3(all) PE IW Copper
CCB1CCB3 PE SW Iron
CONC4laquon4
2563592565
-147
565966
185160841011178
86125560
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLANK ANALYTE CONCltUBL)
3 Fre quency Requirements
a Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matri for every 20 samples and for each digestion bate
x h Yes x No
b Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The j data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonriMn-C
OSEA filraquo MA38F325WB2 - 8
Q X- J [ sift S bull 4+++ gt^^^^^rf^-v-laquo^lti^ w ++ +++ r + + + ltgt^ ++ +-r+r+rtrrt (gt ++ ++ r++ bullbull r t r +r +++bull++ r U i JLf bullbullbullbullpound f-tSw
bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the 1 blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat gtoratory Blanks
-t)Ateuro- - KampCCB mEPBUWK ANALYTE CONCMagL)
012695 CCB3 PBW Sodium 6557173
012695 CCB1 Thallium 20
012695 ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3 (all) PBW Zinc 1679332-48320
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE ECWtP BLANK AJ1ALYTE CQHClugtL)
3 Fre quency Requir ements
a Was a prepare for every 20 s
)tion blank analyzed for each matrix amples and for each digestion batch Yes x No
b Was a calibral every 2 hours
ion blank run every 10 samples or whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonnlNT3-C
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 9
a CJ7jd Tlaquogt ~^^^^^~~~~~~^^^lt~~^^4~~^^~^^~~~^~~~ jJCtfLj I Tls ~~rr~rr
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
IV B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 4)
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five times the highest concentration of that elements contamination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
a When the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
b When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration unqualified
MATRIX Water MATRIX Water
ELEMENT MAXGONC (ugAJ jujiLr
ELEMENT MAX CONGJ AU
Aluminum 359 1795 Antimony -147 73 5
Calcium 966 483
Copper 185 925
Iron 125 625
Sodium 7173 35865
Thallium 2 10
Zinc 167 835
NO TE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to mgkg in order to compare them with the sample results
Cone in ugL X (Volume diluted to (200ml)Weight digested (1gram)) X (1L1 000ml) X (1000gm1kg) X(1mg1000ug) = mgkg
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
Form INT3-7
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 10
SEA IncshyREGION I Data Review Worksheets
V A ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 amp 2)
1 Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not meet the criteria for R
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
none
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample Results R J J Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8-hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FormWTM
QSEA File MA36F325WB2 - 11
Q SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ICS A solution gt 2xlDL that should not be present
Cone of kiterferents Element CONC Detected in the IC9 to the ICS
AL CA FE MG
Barium 14 514927 529351 190348 543610
Sodium 934 514927 529351 190348 543610
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the samples affected by interferences below
Sample Element Sample Merferant Estimated Affected Affected Sample Cone (ugL) Cone bullileffL
AIL CA FE MG (UBU
None
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of A) Ca Fe and Mg are less than 50 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 50 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
FormMT34
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 12
a ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-lnitial
ALUMINUM Lab Value 1004
ICSR 5095600 5077570 x 100 1004
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-Final
MAGNESIUM Lab Value 1018
ICSR 5435000 5336850 x 100 = 1018
Form INT3-9A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 13
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
a INORGANIC INITIAL CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012695
ICPAnalyte COPPER Lab Value 1051
R = 5107 V 4860 100 1051 R
File Name NA Date of Initial Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1004
R 502 50 100 1004
File Name ICV Date of Initial Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 1052
R 989 940 100 1052 R
Form INT3-SA
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 6
SEA Inc ~~~
INORGANIC CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name CCV1 Date of Continuing Calibration 012695
ICP Analyte IRON Lab Value 1008
R 100830 100000 100 1008 R
File Name NA Date of Continuing Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name CCV2 Date of Continuing Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1160
R 23 20 100 1160 R
File Name CCV3 Date of Continuing Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 988
R 1976 2000 100 988 R
FonnlNT3-9B
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 7
Q SEA 1m ^ bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANI-(ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List tht j blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat moratory Blanks
DATE
012695
012695
012695
012695
012695
IC8CC8 PREP BLANK ANALYTE
CCB1CCB3 PE IW Aluminum
CCB1 Antimony
ICBCCB1 Calcium
ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3(all) PE IW Copper
CCB1CCB3 PE SW Iron
CONC4laquon4
2563592565
-147
565966
185160841011178
86125560
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLANK ANALYTE CONCltUBL)
3 Fre quency Requirements
a Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matri for every 20 samples and for each digestion bate
x h Yes x No
b Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The j data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonriMn-C
OSEA filraquo MA38F325WB2 - 8
Q X- J [ sift S bull 4+++ gt^^^^^rf^-v-laquo^lti^ w ++ +++ r + + + ltgt^ ++ +-r+r+rtrrt (gt ++ ++ r++ bullbull r t r +r +++bull++ r U i JLf bullbullbullbullpound f-tSw
bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the 1 blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat gtoratory Blanks
-t)Ateuro- - KampCCB mEPBUWK ANALYTE CONCMagL)
012695 CCB3 PBW Sodium 6557173
012695 CCB1 Thallium 20
012695 ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3 (all) PBW Zinc 1679332-48320
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE ECWtP BLANK AJ1ALYTE CQHClugtL)
3 Fre quency Requir ements
a Was a prepare for every 20 s
)tion blank analyzed for each matrix amples and for each digestion batch Yes x No
b Was a calibral every 2 hours
ion blank run every 10 samples or whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonnlNT3-C
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 9
a CJ7jd Tlaquogt ~^^^^^~~~~~~^^^lt~~^^4~~^^~^^~~~^~~~ jJCtfLj I Tls ~~rr~rr
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
IV B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 4)
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five times the highest concentration of that elements contamination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
a When the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
b When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration unqualified
MATRIX Water MATRIX Water
ELEMENT MAXGONC (ugAJ jujiLr
ELEMENT MAX CONGJ AU
Aluminum 359 1795 Antimony -147 73 5
Calcium 966 483
Copper 185 925
Iron 125 625
Sodium 7173 35865
Thallium 2 10
Zinc 167 835
NO TE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to mgkg in order to compare them with the sample results
Cone in ugL X (Volume diluted to (200ml)Weight digested (1gram)) X (1L1 000ml) X (1000gm1kg) X(1mg1000ug) = mgkg
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
Form INT3-7
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 10
SEA IncshyREGION I Data Review Worksheets
V A ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 amp 2)
1 Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not meet the criteria for R
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
none
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample Results R J J Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8-hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FormWTM
QSEA File MA36F325WB2 - 11
Q SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ICS A solution gt 2xlDL that should not be present
Cone of kiterferents Element CONC Detected in the IC9 to the ICS
AL CA FE MG
Barium 14 514927 529351 190348 543610
Sodium 934 514927 529351 190348 543610
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the samples affected by interferences below
Sample Element Sample Merferant Estimated Affected Affected Sample Cone (ugL) Cone bullileffL
AIL CA FE MG (UBU
None
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of A) Ca Fe and Mg are less than 50 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 50 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
FormMT34
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 12
a ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-lnitial
ALUMINUM Lab Value 1004
ICSR 5095600 5077570 x 100 1004
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-Final
MAGNESIUM Lab Value 1018
ICSR 5435000 5336850 x 100 = 1018
Form INT3-9A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 13
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
SEA Inc ~~~
INORGANIC CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
File Name CCV1 Date of Continuing Calibration 012695
ICP Analyte IRON Lab Value 1008
R 100830 100000 100 1008 R
File Name NA Date of Continuing Calibration
Furnace Analyte Lab Value
File Name CCV2 Date of Continuing Calibration 012395
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 1160
R 23 20 100 1160 R
File Name CCV3 Date of Continuing Calibration 011995
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 988
R 1976 2000 100 988 R
FonnlNT3-9B
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 7
Q SEA 1m ^ bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANI-(ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List tht j blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat moratory Blanks
DATE
012695
012695
012695
012695
012695
IC8CC8 PREP BLANK ANALYTE
CCB1CCB3 PE IW Aluminum
CCB1 Antimony
ICBCCB1 Calcium
ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3(all) PE IW Copper
CCB1CCB3 PE SW Iron
CONC4laquon4
2563592565
-147
565966
185160841011178
86125560
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLANK ANALYTE CONCltUBL)
3 Fre quency Requirements
a Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matri for every 20 samples and for each digestion bate
x h Yes x No
b Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The j data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonriMn-C
OSEA filraquo MA38F325WB2 - 8
Q X- J [ sift S bull 4+++ gt^^^^^rf^-v-laquo^lti^ w ++ +++ r + + + ltgt^ ++ +-r+r+rtrrt (gt ++ ++ r++ bullbull r t r +r +++bull++ r U i JLf bullbullbullbullpound f-tSw
bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the 1 blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat gtoratory Blanks
-t)Ateuro- - KampCCB mEPBUWK ANALYTE CONCMagL)
012695 CCB3 PBW Sodium 6557173
012695 CCB1 Thallium 20
012695 ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3 (all) PBW Zinc 1679332-48320
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE ECWtP BLANK AJ1ALYTE CQHClugtL)
3 Fre quency Requir ements
a Was a prepare for every 20 s
)tion blank analyzed for each matrix amples and for each digestion batch Yes x No
b Was a calibral every 2 hours
ion blank run every 10 samples or whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonnlNT3-C
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 9
a CJ7jd Tlaquogt ~^^^^^~~~~~~^^^lt~~^^4~~^^~^^~~~^~~~ jJCtfLj I Tls ~~rr~rr
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
IV B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 4)
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five times the highest concentration of that elements contamination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
a When the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
b When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration unqualified
MATRIX Water MATRIX Water
ELEMENT MAXGONC (ugAJ jujiLr
ELEMENT MAX CONGJ AU
Aluminum 359 1795 Antimony -147 73 5
Calcium 966 483
Copper 185 925
Iron 125 625
Sodium 7173 35865
Thallium 2 10
Zinc 167 835
NO TE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to mgkg in order to compare them with the sample results
Cone in ugL X (Volume diluted to (200ml)Weight digested (1gram)) X (1L1 000ml) X (1000gm1kg) X(1mg1000ug) = mgkg
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
Form INT3-7
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 10
SEA IncshyREGION I Data Review Worksheets
V A ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 amp 2)
1 Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not meet the criteria for R
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
none
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample Results R J J Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8-hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FormWTM
QSEA File MA36F325WB2 - 11
Q SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ICS A solution gt 2xlDL that should not be present
Cone of kiterferents Element CONC Detected in the IC9 to the ICS
AL CA FE MG
Barium 14 514927 529351 190348 543610
Sodium 934 514927 529351 190348 543610
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the samples affected by interferences below
Sample Element Sample Merferant Estimated Affected Affected Sample Cone (ugL) Cone bullileffL
AIL CA FE MG (UBU
None
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of A) Ca Fe and Mg are less than 50 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 50 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
FormMT34
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 12
a ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-lnitial
ALUMINUM Lab Value 1004
ICSR 5095600 5077570 x 100 1004
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-Final
MAGNESIUM Lab Value 1018
ICSR 5435000 5336850 x 100 = 1018
Form INT3-9A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 13
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
Q SEA 1m ^ bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANI-(ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List tht j blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat moratory Blanks
DATE
012695
012695
012695
012695
012695
IC8CC8 PREP BLANK ANALYTE
CCB1CCB3 PE IW Aluminum
CCB1 Antimony
ICBCCB1 Calcium
ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3(all) PE IW Copper
CCB1CCB3 PE SW Iron
CONC4laquon4
2563592565
-147
565966
185160841011178
86125560
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE EQUIP BLANK ANALYTE CONCltUBL)
3 Fre quency Requirements
a Was a preparation blank analyzed for each matri for every 20 samples and for each digestion bate
x h Yes x No
b Was a calibration blank run every 10 samples or every 2 hours whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The j data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonriMn-C
OSEA filraquo MA38F325WB2 - 8
Q X- J [ sift S bull 4+++ gt^^^^^rf^-v-laquo^lti^ w ++ +++ r + + + ltgt^ ++ +-r+r+rtrrt (gt ++ ++ r++ bullbull r t r +r +++bull++ r U i JLf bullbullbullbullpound f-tSw
bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the 1 blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat gtoratory Blanks
-t)Ateuro- - KampCCB mEPBUWK ANALYTE CONCMagL)
012695 CCB3 PBW Sodium 6557173
012695 CCB1 Thallium 20
012695 ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3 (all) PBW Zinc 1679332-48320
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE ECWtP BLANK AJ1ALYTE CQHClugtL)
3 Fre quency Requir ements
a Was a prepare for every 20 s
)tion blank analyzed for each matrix amples and for each digestion batch Yes x No
b Was a calibral every 2 hours
ion blank run every 10 samples or whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonnlNT3-C
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 9
a CJ7jd Tlaquogt ~^^^^^~~~~~~^^^lt~~^^4~~^^~^^~~~^~~~ jJCtfLj I Tls ~~rr~rr
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
IV B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 4)
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five times the highest concentration of that elements contamination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
a When the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
b When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration unqualified
MATRIX Water MATRIX Water
ELEMENT MAXGONC (ugAJ jujiLr
ELEMENT MAX CONGJ AU
Aluminum 359 1795 Antimony -147 73 5
Calcium 966 483
Copper 185 925
Iron 125 625
Sodium 7173 35865
Thallium 2 10
Zinc 167 835
NO TE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to mgkg in order to compare them with the sample results
Cone in ugL X (Volume diluted to (200ml)Weight digested (1gram)) X (1L1 000ml) X (1000gm1kg) X(1mg1000ug) = mgkg
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
Form INT3-7
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 10
SEA IncshyREGION I Data Review Worksheets
V A ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 amp 2)
1 Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not meet the criteria for R
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
none
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample Results R J J Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8-hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FormWTM
QSEA File MA36F325WB2 - 11
Q SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ICS A solution gt 2xlDL that should not be present
Cone of kiterferents Element CONC Detected in the IC9 to the ICS
AL CA FE MG
Barium 14 514927 529351 190348 543610
Sodium 934 514927 529351 190348 543610
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the samples affected by interferences below
Sample Element Sample Merferant Estimated Affected Affected Sample Cone (ugL) Cone bullileffL
AIL CA FE MG (UBU
None
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of A) Ca Fe and Mg are less than 50 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 50 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
FormMT34
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 12
a ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-lnitial
ALUMINUM Lab Value 1004
ICSR 5095600 5077570 x 100 1004
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-Final
MAGNESIUM Lab Value 1018
ICSR 5435000 5336850 x 100 = 1018
Form INT3-9A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 13
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
Q X- J [ sift S bull 4+++ gt^^^^^rf^-v-laquo^lti^ w ++ +++ r + + + ltgt^ ++ +-r+r+rtrrt (gt ++ ++ r++ bullbull r t r +r +++bull++ r U i JLf bullbullbullbullpound f-tSw
bull bull bull bull bull bull bull
REGION 1 Data Review V Worksheets
IV A BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Sections 1-3)
List the 1 blank contamination in Sections 1 amp 2 below A separate worksheet should be used for soil and water t)lanks
1 Lat gtoratory Blanks
-t)Ateuro- - KampCCB mEPBUWK ANALYTE CONCMagL)
012695 CCB3 PBW Sodium 6557173
012695 CCB1 Thallium 20
012695 ICBCCB1CCB2CCB3 (all) PBW Zinc 1679332-48320
2 Eqi jipmentTrip Blanks
DATE ECWtP BLANK AJ1ALYTE CQHClugtL)
3 Fre quency Requir ements
a Was a prepare for every 20 s
)tion blank analyzed for each matrix amples and for each digestion batch Yes x No
b Was a calibral every 2 hours
ion blank run every 10 samples or whichever is more frequent Yes x No
If NO The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify
the dat a accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FonnlNT3-C
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 9
a CJ7jd Tlaquogt ~^^^^^~~~~~~^^^lt~~^^4~~^^~^^~~~^~~~ jJCtfLj I Tls ~~rr~rr
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
IV B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 4)
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five times the highest concentration of that elements contamination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
a When the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
b When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration unqualified
MATRIX Water MATRIX Water
ELEMENT MAXGONC (ugAJ jujiLr
ELEMENT MAX CONGJ AU
Aluminum 359 1795 Antimony -147 73 5
Calcium 966 483
Copper 185 925
Iron 125 625
Sodium 7173 35865
Thallium 2 10
Zinc 167 835
NO TE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to mgkg in order to compare them with the sample results
Cone in ugL X (Volume diluted to (200ml)Weight digested (1gram)) X (1L1 000ml) X (1000gm1kg) X(1mg1000ug) = mgkg
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
Form INT3-7
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 10
SEA IncshyREGION I Data Review Worksheets
V A ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 amp 2)
1 Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not meet the criteria for R
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
none
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample Results R J J Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8-hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FormWTM
QSEA File MA36F325WB2 - 11
Q SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ICS A solution gt 2xlDL that should not be present
Cone of kiterferents Element CONC Detected in the IC9 to the ICS
AL CA FE MG
Barium 14 514927 529351 190348 543610
Sodium 934 514927 529351 190348 543610
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the samples affected by interferences below
Sample Element Sample Merferant Estimated Affected Affected Sample Cone (ugL) Cone bullileffL
AIL CA FE MG (UBU
None
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of A) Ca Fe and Mg are less than 50 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 50 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
FormMT34
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 12
a ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-lnitial
ALUMINUM Lab Value 1004
ICSR 5095600 5077570 x 100 1004
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-Final
MAGNESIUM Lab Value 1018
ICSR 5435000 5336850 x 100 = 1018
Form INT3-9A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 13
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
a CJ7jd Tlaquogt ~^^^^^~~~~~~^^^lt~~^^4~~^^~^^~~~^~~~ jJCtfLj I Tls ~~rr~rr
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
IV B BLANK ANALYSIS RESULTS (Section 4)
4 Blank Actions
The Action Levels for any analyte is equal to five times the highest concentration of that elements contamination in any blank The action level for samples which have been concentrated or diluted should multiplied by the concentrationdilution factor No positive sample result should be reported unless the concentration of the analyte in the sample exceeds the Action Level (AL) Specific actions are as follows
a When the concentration is greater than the IDL but less than the Action Level report the sample concentration detected with a U
b When the sample concentration is greater than the Action Level report the sample concentration unqualified
MATRIX Water MATRIX Water
ELEMENT MAXGONC (ugAJ jujiLr
ELEMENT MAX CONGJ AU
Aluminum 359 1795 Antimony -147 73 5
Calcium 966 483
Copper 185 925
Iron 125 625
Sodium 7173 35865
Thallium 2 10
Zinc 167 835
NO TE Blanks analyzed during a soil case must be converted to mgkg in order to compare them with the sample results
Cone in ugL X (Volume diluted to (200ml)Weight digested (1gram)) X (1L1 000ml) X (1000gm1kg) X(1mg1000ug) = mgkg
Multiplying this result by 5 to arrive at the action level gives a final result in mgkg which can then be compared to sample results
Form INT3-7
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 10
SEA IncshyREGION I Data Review Worksheets
V A ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 amp 2)
1 Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not meet the criteria for R
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
none
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample Results R J J Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8-hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FormWTM
QSEA File MA36F325WB2 - 11
Q SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ICS A solution gt 2xlDL that should not be present
Cone of kiterferents Element CONC Detected in the IC9 to the ICS
AL CA FE MG
Barium 14 514927 529351 190348 543610
Sodium 934 514927 529351 190348 543610
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the samples affected by interferences below
Sample Element Sample Merferant Estimated Affected Affected Sample Cone (ugL) Cone bullileffL
AIL CA FE MG (UBU
None
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of A) Ca Fe and Mg are less than 50 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 50 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
FormMT34
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 12
a ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-lnitial
ALUMINUM Lab Value 1004
ICSR 5095600 5077570 x 100 1004
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-Final
MAGNESIUM Lab Value 1018
ICSR 5435000 5336850 x 100 = 1018
Form INT3-9A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 13
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
SEA IncshyREGION I Data Review Worksheets
V A ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Sections 1 amp 2)
1 Recovery Criteria
List any elements in the ICS AB solution which did not meet the criteria for R
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
none
ACTIONS
If an element does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 50-79 gt120
Positive Sample Results R J J Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Requirements
Were Interference QC samples run at the beginning and end of each sample analysis run or a minimum of twice per 8-hour working shift whichever is more frequent Yes No
If NO
The data may be affected Use professional judgement to determine the severity of the effect and qualify the data accordingly Discuss any actions below and list the samples affected
FormWTM
QSEA File MA36F325WB2 - 11
Q SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ICS A solution gt 2xlDL that should not be present
Cone of kiterferents Element CONC Detected in the IC9 to the ICS
AL CA FE MG
Barium 14 514927 529351 190348 543610
Sodium 934 514927 529351 190348 543610
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the samples affected by interferences below
Sample Element Sample Merferant Estimated Affected Affected Sample Cone (ugL) Cone bullileffL
AIL CA FE MG (UBU
None
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of A) Ca Fe and Mg are less than 50 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 50 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
FormMT34
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 12
a ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-lnitial
ALUMINUM Lab Value 1004
ICSR 5095600 5077570 x 100 1004
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-Final
MAGNESIUM Lab Value 1018
ICSR 5435000 5336850 x 100 = 1018
Form INT3-9A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 13
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
Q SEA Inc REGION I Data Review Worksheets
V B ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE (Section 3)
3 Report the concentration of any elements detected in the ICS A solution gt 2xlDL that should not be present
Cone of kiterferents Element CONC Detected in the IC9 to the ICS
AL CA FE MG
Barium 14 514927 529351 190348 543610
Sodium 934 514927 529351 190348 543610
Estimate the concentration produced by the interfering element in all affected samples See guidelines for examples List the samples affected by interferences below
Sample Element Sample Merferant Estimated Affected Affected Sample Cone (ugL) Cone bullileffL
AIL CA FE MG (UBU
None
ACTIONS
1 In general the sample data can be accepted without qualification if the sample concentrations of A) Ca Fe and Mg are less than 50 of their respective levels in the ICS solution
2 Estimate (J) positive results for affected elements for samples with levels of interferents 50 or more of that in the ICS solution
3 Reject (R) positive results if the reported concentration is due entirely to the interfering element
4 Estimate (UJ) non-detected results for which false negatives are suspect
Give explanations for any actions taken below
FormMT34
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 12
a ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-lnitial
ALUMINUM Lab Value 1004
ICSR 5095600 5077570 x 100 1004
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-Final
MAGNESIUM Lab Value 1018
ICSR 5435000 5336850 x 100 = 1018
Form INT3-9A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 13
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
a ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-lnitial
ALUMINUM Lab Value 1004
ICSR 5095600 5077570 x 100 1004
Lab File Name
Analyte
ICSAB-Final
MAGNESIUM Lab Value 1018
ICSR 5435000 5336850 x 100 = 1018
Form INT3-9A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 13
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
_ J X^^Xi i yenl gtbull ^ + bull+ r++ bullraquobull 4 f+ w + ltbull laquoif rgt w ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ y^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ltgt raquolaquo^ rw -r^ o^ w bullraquo jraquoS
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
VI MATRIX SPIKE
TR MAGZ28 MATRIX Water
1 Recovery(Criteria
List the pei bullcent recoveries for analytes which did not meet the required criteria
SA SSRSR
shyshy
amount of spike added spikes sample result sample result
Anafyte SSR SR SA shy shy -v UR bull bull ^Acbffln
Cyanide 22061 0 500 441 UJ (all ND)
Matrix Spike Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIO MS
1 If the sample concentration exceeds the spike concentration by a factor of 4 or more no action is taken
2 If any analyte does not meet the R criteria follow the actions stated below
bull bull - - bull bullbull - - - bull PERCENT RECOVERY ltW 30-74 gt125
Positive Sample Results J J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
2 Frequency Criteria
a Was a natrix spike prepared at the required frequen cv Yes X No
b Was a Dost digestion spike analyzed for elements that did not meet required criteria for matrix spike recover v Yes X No
A separate wlt jrksheet should be used for each matrix spike pair
FonnlNT3-10
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 14
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS VERIFICATION
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28S
BARIUM Lab Value 980
R 1993700 33960 200000 100 980 R
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
NA
Lab Value
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Mercury Lab Value 887
R 0887 0000 100 100 887 R
Sample ID MAGZ28S
Analyte Cyanide Lab Value 441
R 220620 0000 50000 100 441 R
Form INT3-10A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 15
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
J bull bull bull bull - bull bull bull - - bull
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
VII LABORATORY DUPLICATES
List the concentrations of any analyte not meeting the criteria for duplicate precision For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in mgkg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was used to evaluate precision by marking an X1 beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
- bull bull ^CRDL--J bull bull bullbull bull -alaquowwrt--- Water M bully-MmiraquoM
ltugU W fcrninta) smpteshy
MACZ38 raquogtacaraquogt-
MACZ38D maet n^m
--o--W Action
Aluminum 200 Antimony 60 Arsenic 10 Barium 200 Beryllium 5 Cadmium 5 Calcium 5000 Chromium 10 Cobalt 50 Copper 25 Iron 100 Lead 5 Magnesium 5000 Manganese 15 Mercury 02 Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 Selenium 5 Silver 10 Sodium 5000 Thallium 10 Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Laboratory Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt20 for waters and gt 35 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gtCRDL (2xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FonnlNT3-11
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 16
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
SEA Incmdash
DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample ID MACZ28D
ICP Analyte CALCIUM Lab Value 14
11697 11535 11697 11535 2 100 139
Sample ID
Furnace Analyte
Sample ID
Analyte
NO DETECTIONS
Sample ID
Analyte
NA
Lab Value
MACZ28D
Mercury Lab Value NA
MACZ28D
Cyanide Lab Value NA
NO DETECTIONS
FormlNT3-11A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 17
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
Ttfir ~ r^ r~ ~~ ~ rlaquo-lt~ ~~+ ~ r^ bull QSpound4j yenits bullbull -
REGION 1 Data Revie sw Worksheets
VIII FIEL D DUPLICATES
Listt he concentrations of all analytes in the field duplicate pair For soil duplicates calculate the CRDL in me kg using the sample weight volume and percent solids data for the sample Indicate what criteria was ijsed to evaluate precision by marking an X beside the RPD or CRDL for each element
MATRIX Water
CRDL Etenwnt Water Soft swnpte Dapttcte JVD Action
(usfl) m ltmqB) MACZ3B MA6D77 m Aluminum 200 X 569 71
Antimony 60
Arsenic 10
Barium 200 X 91 144 Beryllium 5
Cadmium 5
Calcium 5000 X 11700 11900 Chromium 10
Cobalt 50 Copper 25 X 118 34
Iron 100 X 69 105
Lead 5 X 19 14
Magnesium 5000 X 2110 2220 Manganese 15 X 616 669 Mercury 02
Nickel 40 Potassium 5000 X 2880 2870 Selenium 5
Silver 10
Sodium 5000 X 5670 5460 Thallium 10
Vanadium 50 Zinc 20 Cyanide 10
Field Duplicate Actions should be applied to all other samples of the same matrix type
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results for elements which have an RPD gt30 for waters and gt 50 for soils
2 If sample results are less than 5x the CRDL estimate (J) positive results for elements whose absolute difference is gt2xCRDL (4xCRDL for soils) If both samples are non-detected the RPD is not calculated (NC)
FormlNTa-12
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 18
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
QSEA 1bullV
REGION 1 Data Revie w Worksheets
IX LABOF RATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
1 Aq ueous LCS
Lis t any LCS recoveries not within the 80-120 criteria and the samples affected
DATE ELEMENT R ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
None
2 Sol id LCS
List any analytes that were not within the control windows set by the EPA for the solid LCS sample The j 80-1 20 criteria is not used to evaluate solid LCS results
EUE1WENT LCSCONC CONTROL WINDOWS ACTION SAMPLES AFFECTED
AC TIONS
- bull bull bull bull bull - --- --H--reRCErrlaquoEcovElaquoY bullshy - bull bull - Aqueous LCS -bulllaquobulllaquo - mdash bullbullbullbullbullbull
iBiJ gtlaquoZO Positive Sample Results R J J
Non-detected Sample Results R UJ A
Solid LCS ltEPA Control Windows gtEPA Control Windows Positive Sample Results J J
Non-detected Sample Results UJ A
3 Frequency Criteria
a Was an LCS anal) zed for every matrix every Yes X No digestion batch ai id every 20 samples
Form INT3-13
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 19
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
SEA Incmdash
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE VERIFICATION
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 973
Matrix WATER
R 18279 1878 100 9733 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte SILVER Lab Value 922
Matrix WATER
R 4409 478 100 9224 R
Sample ID LCS
ICP Analyte ZINC Lab Value 941
Matrix WATER
R 27478 2921 100 9407 R
Form INT3-13A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 20
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
SEA Incmdash~~mdashmdash~~~~mdash-
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
X A FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
1 Duplicate Precision
NA Duplicate injections and one-point analytical spikes were performed for all samples duplicate injections agreed within +- 20
Duplicate injections andor spikes were not performed for the following sampleselements
Duplicate injections did not agree within +- 20 for sampleselements
2 Post Digestion Spike Recoveries
Spike recoveries met the 85-115 recovery criteria for all samples
Spike recoveries did not meet the 85-115 criteria but did not require MSA for the following samples
MSA was used to quantitate analytical results when contractually required
Correlation coefficients gt= 0995 accept results Correlation coefficients lt 0995 for sample numberselements
Method of Standard Addition (MSA) was not performed as required for sampleselements
ACTIONS 1 Estimate (J) positive results if duplicate injections are outside +- 20 RSD or CV
2 If the sample absorbance is lt50 of post digestion spike absorbance the following actions should be applied
Positive Sample Results J OR R J J Non-detected Results R UJ A
3 Estimate (J) sample results if MSA was required and not performed
4 Estimate (J) sample results if correlation coefficient was lt0995
Form INT3-14
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 21
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
r~fr SEA
REGION 1 Data Review Worksheets
XI INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA (ICP) SERIAL DILUTION ANALYSIS
X Serial Dilutions were performed for each matrix and results of the diluted sample analysis agreed within ten percent of the original undiluted analysis for analyte concentrations gt 50x the IDL before dilution
_ Serial Dilutions were not performed for the following
Serial Dilutions were performed but analytical results did not agree within 10 for analyte concentrations greater than 50x the IDL before dilution
Report all results below that do not meet the required laboratory criteria for ICP serial dilution analysis
MATRIX Water
SAMPLE SERIAL ELEMENT IDL WxlDL RESULT DILUTION O ACTION
Aluminum Barium Beryllium Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper Iron Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel
Potassium Silver Sodium Vanadium Zinc
Actions apply to all samples of the same matrix
ACTIONS
1 Estimate (J) positive results if D gt15
FormlNTS-15
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 22
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
ICP SERIAL DILUTION VERIFICATION
Sample ID MAGZ28L
ICP Analyte ALUMINUM Lab Value 55
D 4916 4647 4916 100 547
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
IRON Lab Value 54
D 53034 5588 53034 100 -537
Sample ID
ICP Analyte
MAGZ28L
SODIUM Lab Value 04
D 75212 74915 75212 100 039
FormlNT3-15A
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 23
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XII DETECTION LIMIT RESULTS
1 Instrument Detection Limits
X Instrument Detection Limit results were present and found to be less than the Contract Required Detection Limits
IDLs were not included in the data package on Form XI
IDLs were present but the criteria was not met for the following elements
2 Reporting Requirements
Were sample results on Form I reported down to the IDL not the CRDL for all analytes Yes X No
NA Were sample results that were analyzed by ICP for Se Tl As or Pb at least 5x IDL Yes No
Were sample weights volumes and dilutions taken into account when reporting detection limits on Form I Yes X No
If NO The reported results may be inaccurate Make the necessary changes on the data summary tables and request that the laboratory resubmit the corrected data
Form INT3-16
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 24
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
a $EAeJf lt JLj
REGION I Data Review Worksheets
XIII SAMPLE QUANTITATION
Yes Sample results fall within the linear range for ICP and within the calibrated range for all other parameters
Sample results were beyond the linear rangecalibration range of the instrument for the following sampleselements
In the space below please show a minimum of one sample calculation per method
ICP
1170000 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 11700
Sample ID = MACZ38 Calcium Lab Value = 11700 ugL
FURNACE
NA
MERCURY
-006 (mgL) x 10000 10000 100 -00550
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 02U
CYANIDE
-050 (mgL) x 5000 5000 100 -05000
Sample ID = MAEN08 Lab Value = 100U
For soil samples the following equation may be necessary to convert raw data values (usually reported in ugL) to actual sample concentrations (mgkg)
The lab is required to use 1 gram sample (wet weight) to 200 ml
Wet weight concentration =
digest cone in (ug L) x (200ml 1 gm) x (1L 1000ml) x (lOOOgm 1kg) x (1mg lOOOug) = mg kg
In addition the sample results are converted to dry weight using the percent solids calculations
(Wet weight cone solids) x 100 = final concentration dry weight (mg kg)
FontilHTS-17
QSEA File MA38F325WB2 - 25
