“Competitive battles” Christensen Munir Mandviwalla Fox School of Business Temple University.
-
Upload
eugenia-johnston -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of “Competitive battles” Christensen Munir Mandviwalla Fox School of Business Temple University.
“Competitive battles”Christensen
Munir MandviwallaFox School of Business
Temple University
Companies
Consumers
Signals of change
Competitive battles
Non-consumers / Not consuming
• Change• Simple• Increase access• Increase ability• Reduce financial barrier• Reduce skill barrier• Easily• Effectively
• Signals• Growth rate• Specific segments
(college students!)• Product or service
delivery chain• RELATIVE low price
• How• Convenience• Customization• Lower price
• Leads to: New market disruptive innovation
Undershot
• Change• Incremental• More radical
• Signals• Consumer frustration• Negative reviews• Willingness to pay higher
prices• Prosperity of niche
integrators• Specialists struggle
• How – existing customers• Performance - Reliability• Performance -
Functionality• Integration - need it for
radical• Compatibility• Interoperability• Legacy
• Leads to: Sustaining up-market (radical or incremental innovation)
Overshot
• Change• Basis for competition• Make the product “less
good”• Commoditize
• Signals• Decreasing prices over
time (refusal to pay for more)
• Features not used• Complaints about
‘complicated’• How• Value chain• Convenience• Customization• Low prices
• Ease of use (flexible and convenience, customizability, price)
• Leads to• Low-end disruptions (convenience/price)
• Specialists displace integrated players (need modularity)
• Standards based competition
Signals of change
Source: Christensen, C., Anthony, S., and Roth, E. “Seeing What’s Next: Using the Theories of Innovation to Predict Industry Change.” Harvard Business School Press, 2006, p.2.
Law of gravity (profit)Move up-market
Serve more profitable customers who are willing to
pay higher
Low - cost
Differentiation
The cycle continues
Incumbents
New firms
Resources (do they have or can they
get)
Processes(are they any
good)
Values (Can they seize the
opportunity)
How do you analyze the above?
1. Entrants enter behind a shield of asymmetric motivation; early incumbent response leads to cramming
2. Entrants grow and improve; incumbents chose flight
3. Entrants utilize the sword of asymmetric skills
The sword and the shield