Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

38
Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316

Transcript of Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Page 1: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Comparing Private Cloud CapabilitiesMichael PascoeManaging Director – Olikka@OlikkaTech

VIR316

Page 2: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

partner

Michael PascoeManaging Director @OlikkaTech

Olikka- Gold Virtualisation & Management- Gold Desktop- Silver Server

Page 3: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Olikka

We are experts inInfrastructure Management and Virtualization

We specialise in theDesign and Deployment of

Microsoft and Citrix software

We focus on two areasPrivate Cloud and Windows Client

is a specialist systems integrator

Page 4: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

The Series

Comparing…

Core Virtualisation Platforms

Private CloudCapabilities

Private Cloud ChoicesPrivate Cloud Comparisons

VIR311On Demand

Page 5: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Private Cloud Attributes

Plus withPrivate Cloud…

It’s cloud, dedicated

to you

Pooled Resources

Self-Service Elastic Usage Based

Control Customizable

Page 6: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Product View

Hypervisor

VM Management

Automation

Service Mgmt.

Self-Service

Monitoring

vSphere Hypervisor

vCentervFabric Application Director

vCenter Orchestrator

VMware Service Manager

vCloud Director

vCenter Ops Mgmt. SuitevFabric App Perf Mgr, vFabric

Hyperic

Hyper-V

Virtual Machine Manager

Orchestrator

Service Manager

App Controller

Operations Manager

Protection Data Recovery 2.0Data Protection

Manager

Page 7: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Licensing View

Hypervisor

VM Management

Automation

Service Mgmt.

Self-Service

Monitoring

vSphere Hypervisor

vCentervFabric Application Director

vCenter Orchestrator

VMware Service Manager

vCloud Director

vCenter Ops Mgmt. SuitevFabric App Perf Mgr, vFabric

Hyperic

Hyper-V

Virtual Machine Manager

Orchestrator

Service Manager

App Controller

Operations Manager

Protection Data Recovery 2.0Data Protection

ManagerSystem Center 2012

Standard

Hyper-V (free)

Advanced

Enterprise

Standard

Standard

Standard

Standard

Enterprise

Enterprise

Enterprise

Advanced

Advanced

Enterprise

Advanced

Advanced

Enterprise

Advanced

Enterprise

Page 8: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Hypervisor

VM Management

Automation

Service Management

Self-Service

Monitoring

Protection

Page 9: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Comparison Focus

All About the App

Cross-Platform From the Metal Up

Foundation For the Future

Cloud On Your Terms

Page 10: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Comparison Focus

All about the App

Page 11: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Constructing, Delivering & Consuming Apps

Maintaining, Managing & Monitoring Apps

Protection of Key Applications & Workloads

All About the App

Page 12: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

demo

Agile Service Delivery

All About the App

Page 13: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

StandardizedVM Templates

Roles & FeaturesApplication Layers

VM Templates 2.0:Service Templates

Deploymentinto clouds

Role-basedSelf Service

Controlled Consumption

Construction, Delivery & Consumption

All About the App

Page 14: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Microsoft | VMware Comparison

Application Construction, Delivery & Consumption

Capability Microsoft VMware

Request Private Cloud Resources Yes Unproven1

Role-Based Self-Service Yes Yes2

Standardized Templates Yes Yes3

Template Granularity: Roles / Features Yes No

Template Granularity: Application Layer Yes Yes4

Service/Multi-Tier Templates Yes Yes4

Deployment Across Heterogeneous Clouds Yes No1. VMware vCloud Request Manager has been deprecated with customers recommended to upgrade to VMware Service

Manager2. Requires vCloud Director, available at additional cost3. Each VMware VM template will have it’s own VMDK, even if the template varies only slightly in it’s configuration options.4. Whilst VMware offer no alternative to Server App-V, vFabric Application Director would allow more granular control over the

application layer for certain apps, and provide the ability to deploy multi-tiered services

VMware Information: http://www.vmware.com/products/vcloud-request-manager/overview.html, http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vfabric/VMware-vFabric-Application-Director-Datasheet.pdf

Page 15: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

demo

Reducing Time toResolution

All About the App

Page 16: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Centralized Maintenance

Extends beyond the private cloud

Integrated Service Management

Powerful, relevant automation

Deep application insight

ConnectingDev-Ops

Maintenance, Management & Monitoring

All About the App

Page 17: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Microsoft | VMware Comparison

1. VMware, with Update Manager, can patch ESXi Hosts, and with the vCenter Operations Management Suite Enterprise Plus, can manage physical hosts, and guest OS’s from a patching perspective. Customers would require VMware Hyperic to perform any kind of monitoring of the physical infrastructure. Both of these additional products are licensed per VM and come at considerable expense.

2. Would require vCenter Operations Management Suite Enterprise Plus and VMware Hyperic to manage any physical systems.3. vCloud Request Manager deprecated with customers encouraged to upgrade to the unproven VMware Service Manager, with no guarantees of integration with other vCenter

Management Components.4. VMware's vCenter Orchestrator has a limited set of plug-ins, of which the vast majority are VMware centric. No mention of plug-ins for other enterprise management systems and

tools such as those from HP, IBM, BMC etc.5. VMware require multiple tools to deliver any form of insight. vCenter Operations will monitor hosts, vFabric Hyperic will monitor applications on physical servers, but simply collects

metrics, without providing guidance for remediation. vFabric APM required for insight into a limited number of applications6. Lab Manager deprecated, with customers expected to upgrade to vCloud Director, which has no connections with Development IDE.

VMware Information: http://www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcenter-operations-management/compare-editions.html, http://www.vmware.com/products/application-platform/vfabric-hyperic/overview.html, http://www.vmware.com/products/vcloud-request-manager/overview.html, http://www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/service-manager/overview.html, http://www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcenter-orchestrator/plugins.html , http://www.vmware.com/products/labmanager/overview.html

Application Maintenance, Management & Monitoring

Capability Microsoft VMware

Centralized Patching & Maintenance Yes Yes1

Non-Virtualized Infrastructure Management Yes Yes2

Integrated Service Management Yes Unproven3

Heterogeneous Automation Yes VMware Centric4

Deep Application Insight Yes Multiple Tools5

Integrated Dev-Ops Yes No6

Page 18: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Granular Workload Protection

Physical orVirtual

Generic DataSource Protection

Centralized, Role-Based

Management

Backup toTape

Low-CostDisaster Recovery

Protection of Key Applications & Workloads

All About the App

Page 19: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Microsoft | VMware Comparison

1. VMware Data Recovery 2.0 offers no protection for the workloads within the virtual machine, simply focusing on the VM itself as the protection unit and offers no protection of physical machines

2. VMware Data Recovery 2.0 is not extensible by 3rd parties3. VMware Data Recovery 2.0 appliances are unaware of one another, leading to potentially duplicated backups, or missed backups.4. VMware Data Recovery 2.0 offers no protection to tape media. Disk only5. VMware vCenter Site Recovery Manager provides a solution for disaster recovery, it comes at significant additional cost, which rises for each VM that is

protected.

VMware Information: http://www.vmware.com/products/data-recovery/overview.html, http://www.vmware.com/products/site-recovery-manager/features.html

Protection of Key Applications & WorkloadsCapability Microsoft VMware

Granular Workload Protection Yes No1

Physical & Virtual Protection Yes No1

3rd Party Integration Yes No2

Centralized Role-Based Management Yes No3

Tape Backup Yes No4

Low Cost Disaster Recovery Yes No5

Page 20: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Comparison Focus

Cross Platformfrom the metal up

Cross Platform from the metal up

Page 21: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Fabric

Hypervisor

OS

Management

Application Frameworks

Cross Platform from the metal up

Page 22: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

demo

Heterogeneous Management

Cross Platform from the metal up

Page 23: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Microsoft | VMware Comparison

1. VMware vCenter manages VMware ESX and ESXi only. Would require additional 3rd party technologies to manage alternative hypervisors.2. VMware do not produce any operating systems, and support is therefore focused not on the guest operating system itself, but instead, on the VM Tools and

hardware.3. A number of enterprise management tools integrate with vCenter, however VMware’s management tools, and orchestration tools lack broad interoperability

with other systems.4. vFabric is a platform focused 100% on Spring, Java, and is available at considerable expense, on a per VM basis. Development tools are disconnected from

other management tools, and only vFabric APM can provide insight into the applications, available at additional expense.

VMware Information: http://partnerweb.vmware.com/GOSIG/home.html, http://www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcenter-orchestrator/plugins.html,http://www.vmware.com/products/application-platform/vfabric-hyperic/plugins.html. http://www.vmware.com/products/application-platform/

Cross-Platform Infrastructure ManagementCapability Microsoft VMware

Multi-Hypervisor Management Yes No1

Comprehensive Guest OS Support Yes Yes2

3rd Party Management Integration Yes Limited3

Multiple Application Frameworks Yes Spring4

Page 24: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Comparison Focus

Foundation forthe Future

Foundation for the Future

Page 25: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Hyper-V Server 2012Free Standalone DownloadContains

HypervisorWindows Server Driver ModelKey Virtualization Components

Small FootprintMinimal OverheadIntegrates into current infrastructureFeature rich

Foundation for the Future

Page 26: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Scalability, Performance & Density

Security & Multitenanc

y

Flexible Infrastructu

re

High Availabilit

y & Resiliency

Host: 320 LP | 4TBHost: 1024 VMs

VM: 64 vCPU | 1TBVM: 64TB VHDX

Cluster: 64 | 4000Virtual Fiber Channel

4K Disk SupportODXQoS

Extensible Switch:PVLANS

ARP/ND SpoofingDHCP GuardMonitoringMirroring

DVMQ | SR-IOVIPsec Task Offload

BitLocker

Live MigrationStorage MigrationShared-Nothing LM

NetworkVirtualization

Incremental BackupHyper-V Replica

NIC TeamingCluster: 64 | 4000Secure Clustered

StorageEnhanced CSV

3 Level AvailabilityPriority & Affinity

Hyper-V: A More Complete Virtualization Platform

Foundation for the Future

Page 27: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Comparison Focus

Cloud on your terms

Cloud on your terms

Page 28: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Microsoft

Private Cloud

Microsoft

Private Cloud

System Center 2012

Microsoft Public Cloud

IDENTITY | MANAGEMENT | VIRTUALIZATION | DEVELOPMENT

Cloud on your terms

Page 29: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

vCloud

vCloud

vCloudConnecto

r

Cloud on your terms

Page 30: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Comparison Focus

Costs of the Cloud

Page 31: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

500 Virtual Machine Private Cloud

15:1VM to Host Ratio

34 Hosts2 CPU w/ 16 Cores

Windows Server licensing additional

Comprehensive Management

68 CPUs of Windows Server

Datacenter

Page 32: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

500 Virtual Machine Private Cloud |

68 CPUsHyper-V Server

$0

68 CPUsSystem Center

2012$122,638*

Total Cost$122,638

Provides complete infrastructure management including:Application Performance Management, Self-Service, Backup & Application

Protection,IT Service Management & Service Catalog, Orchestration and much more…

* System Center Pricing: http://download.microsoft.com/download/1/1/1/11128EC7-2BE7-480C-9D46-4ECECA9E481A/System%20Center%202012%20Licensing%20Datasheet.pdf

Page 33: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

500 Virtual Machine Private Cloud |

68 CPUsvSphere ENT+

$237,6601

vCenter$4,9951

vCOPS ENT$97,5002

vFabric APM$180,0003

vFabric AD$125,0004

vCloud Director$75,0005

Costs, without S&S in excess of $720,155 yet lacks service management, workload protection,

in-guest management, and costs grow with density due to per-VM licensing

1. vSphere Enterprise Plus CPU & vCenter Pricing (Excluding S&S): http://www.vmware.com/products/vsphere/pricing.html2. vCenter Operations Management Suite Enterprise pricing (Excluding S&S): http://

www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcenter-operations-management/buy.html 3. vFabric Application Performance Manager Pricing (Excluding S&S): http://www.vmware.com/products/application-platform/vfabric-application-performance-manager/buy.html 4. vFabric Application Director Pricing (Excluding S&S): http://www.vmware.com/products/application-platform/vfabric-appdirector/how-to-buy.html5. vCloud Director Pricing (Excluding S&S): http://www.vmware.com/products/vcloud-director/buy.html

Page 34: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

500 Virtual Machine Private Cloud |

68 CPUsvCloud Suite

Standard$339,6601

• vSphere Enterprise Plus• vCloud Director• vCloud Connector• vCloud Networking and

Security Standard

1. vCloud Suite Pricing (Excluding S&S): http://www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcloud-suite/pricing.html

68 CPUsvCloud Suite

Advanced$509,6601

• vCloud Suite Standard • vCloud Networking and

Security Advanced• vCenter Operations

Management Suite Advanced

68 CPUsvCloud SuiteEnterprise$781,6601

• vCloud Suite Advanced• vCenter Operations

Management Suite Enterprise

• vFabric Application Director

• vCenter Site Recovery Manager Enterprise

Page 35: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Summary

ClosingThoughts

Page 36: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Comparison Focus

All About the App

Cross-Platform From the Metal Up

Foundation For the Future

Cloud On Your Terms

Page 37: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

Related ContentBreakout Sessions

VIR311 Comparing Core Virtualisation Platforms (Online)VIR317 Deploying Virtualisation Infrastructure from Ground ZeroSIM332 Private Cloud Service Delivery and Automation with System

Center 2012SIM333 System Center 2012 Application Management

Find Me Later At…

Twitter @OlikkaTechBlog http://bolikka.com

Page 38: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @OlikkaTech VIR316.

© 2012 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries.The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the

part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.