Combined-Cycle Power Plant Concepts meeting the demand for ... · The operating regime of Siemens...
Transcript of Combined-Cycle Power Plant Concepts meeting the demand for ... · The operating regime of Siemens...
Power-Gen Asia 2003 ID203 Rev.3
24.07.2003
Combined-Cycle Power Plant Concepts meeting the demand for
operational flexibility
Wolfgang Menapace,
Matthias Fränkle,
Dr. Bert Rukes
Siemens AG, Power Generation, Germany
1 of 1
Power-Gen Asia 2003 ID203 Rev.3
24.07.2003
Abstract
Based on observations of the power industry in different regions, the suppliers of power plants
have to cope with different market and customer requirements. The prioritization of aspects
like low life cycle costs, proven design, performance and operational flexibility differs for
each market. The challenging task is to combine and optimize these different aspects to fulfill
the specific customers requirements.
This presentation illustrates how plant concepts are being developed for our customers under
the varying conditions of deregulated markets. Many plants which were built with a focus on
base-load operation will e.g. need to be operated with considerably more flexibility to
compete in changing power markets.
It will be demonstrated how the operation mode of a plant – base load vs. intermediate load –
influences the plant design and the economic evaluation. Due to the change in operating
requirements, more plants will be spending additional time off line. This increased down time
typically extends the time to restart the facility. Therefore it is important to provide a higher
level of operating flexibility to enhance the value of the new generation assets. The goal will
be to own a plant that has the efficiency of a traditional base-load combined cycle plant while
incorporating fast start-up and cycling capability and perceive potential market changes to
allow a highly competitive product over life time.
The paper will address results of a program within the authors’ company to develop an
integrated combined-cycle plant design that offers fast start-up and cycling flexibility without
adversely affecting efficiency or reliability. Examples of plant concepts are evaluated
regarding the economic benefits of its application depending on the market conditions.
2 of 2
Power-Gen Asia 2003 ID203 Rev.3
24.07.2003
Introduction
Market environment of deregulation
Current forecasts show a progressing deregulation of the power market worldwide of about
40% until 2005 (Fíg.1).
source: internal data collection and analysis
Figure 1 Deregulated markets: Power production [TWh], Share of deregulation [%]
Besides the additional power demand the replacement of aging power plant units will become
the most important driver for the future development of the power plant market. The
liberalization and more restrictive environmental aspects will even accelerate this process.
In a deregulated business environment and given the unstable natural gas and electricity prices
Combined Cycle Power Plants are favored because of their relatively short pay-back periods,
advantageous emission values and therefore will dominate the market. However, modern
Clean Coal technologies (ultra supercritical steam plants, gasification, fluidized bed
combustion) will be part of the market to establish a well balanced energy mix, especially
where indigenous resources are cheaply available.
Demand for more flexible plants
3 of 3
Power-Gen Asia 2003 ID203 Rev.3
24.07.2003
Figure 2 Market segmentation model
In a deregulated market the competitive position of a power plant must be defended
constantly. This effect is illustrated by the “market segmentation model” (Fig. 2). In this
model the individual units in the market are ranked by their variable operating costs. From the
load curve of the power supply system over the cumulative capacity of the units the projected
dispatch factor for each unit can be determined.
Due to the market entrance of more modern and cost effective plants (e.g. unit X in Fig.2) the
existing units will be forced to dispatch in a different operation mode after a certain time, i.e.
base load-designed plants are demanded to be operated in a non-base load regime to have
them in operation only when the revenues of electrical production are favorable or upon
dispatcher’s request.
This might force power companies to overcome this described scenario by stepping forward
in ranking with the help of modernization or the adaptation of a new operation mode in order
to ensure the competitiveness of a power plant in future.
The operating regime of Siemens PG’s 50Hz V94.3A gas turbines in commercial operation
reveals today’s requirement to operate V94.3A-class based combined cycle power plants in
intermediate or alternating operation. Power plants based on the predecessor model V94.2 are
already forced into daily cycling or peaking operation (Fig.3 ).
4 of 4
Power-Gen Asia 2003 ID203 Rev.3
24.07.2003
Figure 3 Operating regimes of V94-engines
To help owners cope with such uncertainties, Siemens PG provides combined-cycle power
plants with enhanced operational flexibility. This enables power plant owners to continuously
operate their plants under the most economic conditions.
From a plant operating capability standpoint the change of the operational regime toward
more intermediate duty significantly compromises its economics, especially when the power
plant is designed as a base-load facility. The effect of “hidden” or unknown costs of cycling is
caused by increased forced outages, lost production, increased frequency of failures in major
components [1].
The major challenge for plant managers in a deregulated market is to respond quickly to
profitable dispatch opportunities. The majority of recently built combined-cycle plants do not
fully support these challenges and little progress has been made to improve this situation.
Several publications have already outlined existing industry practices on plant cycling [2].
They recommend obvious scope provisions such as auxiliary boilers, automated drains and
vents, etc. This paper will not elaborate on these.
5 of 5
Power-Gen Asia 2003 ID203 Rev.3
24.07.2003
Figure 4 1S.V94.3A Combined Cycle Power Plant
This paper introduces details on the Siemens PG´s development of a straightforward
combined-cycle plant based on the single-shaft arrangement with improved start-up time
while not sacrificing base load efficiency.
Plant Design Considerations for Cycling/Fast Start Capability Operational flexibility in this regard means the power plant capability of performing increased
numbers of start-up and shut down events, high efficient part load operation and rapid load
following as well as special tasks like house load and grid support operation.
The major challenge to increase the cycling capabilities of a highly efficient combined cycle
power plant without sacrificing base load performance basically comes down to the question
on how thermal stresses in the HRSG and the steam turbine might be reduced.
6 of 6
Power-Gen Asia 2003 ID203 Rev.3
24.07.2003
Starting point: Configuration and Definitions
Starting point of the analysis was the current design of the 50Hz single-shaft. The Siemens
PG single-shaft concept has been introduced to the market in 1994 (King´s Lynn, UK) and
accumulated a big pool of operational data for different load regimes which allowed to start
the analysis on real operational data.
The single-shaft concept offers some inherent advantages with regard to cycling requirements
due to the lower system complexity of the water-/steam cycle. (Fig. 5).
Since most of the systems subroutines are put into operation by the unit coordination program
during an automated start-up a critical path analysis offered the best opportunities to focus on
the limiting components.
Figure 5 water-/steam cycle of a single-shaft
In the next step the team had to agree on an operating regime. The established differentiation
between hot, warm and cold starts and the corresponding downtime assumption was found not
to be precise enough to base a thorough analysis on it. In addition to that a definition for
“Start-up time” based on unmistakable milestones was required.
Due to the fact, that it is hard to predict a future load regime for today’s base-loaded
combined-cycle plants, a “worst case” scenario was selected. Such a load regime might apply
to a merchant plant which needs to operate and survive with the opportunities and the risks of
a short-term market without the security of a long-term power purchase agreement that
guarantees the revenue stream.
7 of 7
Power-Gen Asia 2003 ID203 Rev.3
24.07.2003
The attached table summarizes the assumptions of the analysis:
Definition of start-up time From ignition of gas turbine to gas turbine at
full load and all steam-bypasses closed
Definition of shut-down time From initiation of shutdown from base load
to flame-off signal of gas turbine
Duration of an overnight standstill 8-16h
Duration of a weekend standstill 16-64h
Duration of a prolonged standstill >64h
Number of starts after overnight standstill 200 starts/a
Number of starts after weekend standstill 50 starts/a
Number of starts after extended standstill 2 starts/a
With regard to start-up, the plant components restrict each other in terms of maximum
allowable temperature gradients or necessary heat soaking time. This is an effect of
interdependent systems and cannot be neglected. However, under the umbrella of the
Reference Plant program, experts from various disciplines including gas turbine, steam
turbine, plant engineering, HRSG engineering and including vendors, were brought together
to integrate component and system design to enable the following:
• Fast GT ramp-up:
The gas turbine (GT) to be ramped up in combined-cycle applications close to the load
ramps as they are in simple-cycle applications, almost unrestricted by downstream
components
• ST life –time consumption:
The ability to quantify the effect of start-ups on the steam turbine maintenance schedule,
enabling the power plant manager to set a business strategy considering the ST and
HRSG, harmonized with GT maintenance
The result of the development was successful as shown in Figure 6 for a plant start-up after an
overnight shutdown. The diagram compares the relative power output of a “Typical Plant”
and a single-shaft with improved cycling capability. Both configurations consider triple-
pressure reheat bottoming cycles:
8 of 8
Power-Gen Asia 2003 ID203 Rev.3
24.07.2003
Figure 6 Load curves after 8h downtime
As per definition the preparation for start-up is not included in the start-up time which starts
with ignition of the gas turbine (A). At rated speed the generator is synchronized and
connected to the grid and the GT is loaded to minimum output (B). The gas turbine output and
hence the exhaust gas temperature is increased further with the target to reach a GT load to
operate completely in the low NOx premix mode. In parallel the steam lines and steam turbine
valves are warmed-up (C). The steam turbine is rolled on, synchronized and loaded (D) while
the GT is continuously ramped up, the steam bypass valves are closing (E) and the steam
turbine accepts all generated steam. The gas turbine load is increased to rated power and the
plant reaches approximately 97% of its rated power (F).
This optimized start-up scheme makes the plant start-up approx. twice as fast as its
predecessor after overnight, weekend and prolonged shutdowns. One key for this
improvement is Siemens’ patented Benson Once-Through Steam Generator (Benson-OTSG).
9 of 9
Power-Gen Asia 2003 ID203 Rev.3
24.07.2003
Benson Once -Through Steam Generator (OTSG)
The Benson technology has proven its capability and reliability throughout the past 70 years.
This technology is well known throughout the industry in both sub- and supercritical designs
in conventional steam power plants.
Siemens PG also successfully applied the Benson evaporator principle in a 390 MW
combined-cycle application at Cottam Development Center, Nottinghamshire (United
Kingdom). This state-of-the-art single-shaft facility has been in commercial operation since
1999. During this period the Benson-OTSG (Figure 7) has shown its direct applicability for
fast-start up and cycling operation, even though the Cottam plant was not explicitly designed
for this duty.
Figure 7 Benson-OTSG at Cottam Development Center (triple-pressure reheat steam cycle)
The HP-/IP-evaporator stages are characterized by two bundles of vertical tubes, which are
arranged in series in the horizontal gas-path (Fig. 8). All tubes within an evaporator bundle
are connected in parallel, creating natural circulation characteristics. The low mass flux
design allows the fluid mass flow to self-adjust to the heat input in each tube row, meaning
tubes with higher heat absorption will see an increased fluid mass flow. This design ensures
static and dynamic flow stability throughout a wide load range. In addition it results in lower
pressure losses across the evaporator compared to other once-through concepts.
The Benson-OTSG is capable of handling high temperature transients during a fast start-up
due to the elimination of thick-walled steam drums. The HP drum, in particular, impedes fast
10 of 10
Power-Gen Asia 2003 ID203 Rev.3
24.07.2003
start-up of conventional HRSG’s by dictating long soaking periods and slow maximum
allowable temperature ramp rates. The Benson-OTSG eliminates these restrictions by
replacing the drum with a small separator vessel. The separator performs the function of
water/steam separation during start-up and shutdown. At steady state operation, including low
loads, the steam flow passes through the separator as part of the interconnecting piping toward
the superheater. The steam at the evaporator outlet is slightly superheated; consequently no
separation occurs.
Figure 8 Once-Through Steam Generator Section
In contrast with a drum-type HRSG, the Benson OTSG is able to control the main steam
temperature by modulating the feedwater massflow. This enables the system to compensate
the effects of changing ambient conditions or GT loads within a certain range without placing
the steam attemperators in operation. Attemperators are incorporated as interstage, as well as
final-stage desuperheater for the high pressure and reheat steam systems. This arrangement
ensures compliance with the steam temperature limits, dictated by the steam turbine during
plant start-up.
Simply stated, the Benson OTSG retains all the positive features offered by the traditional
drum-type HRSG, while providing enhanced cycling capability over the drum-type HRSGs.
Steam Turbine
The plant concept is based on a 2 casing 3 pressure reheat HE-type Steam Turbine (ST). The
ST is started power-output oriented, which means that it is loaded fast with reduced and
11 of 11
Power-Gen Asia 2003 ID203 Rev.3
24.07.2003
nearly constant steam temperatures until the bypass valves are closed and the GT reaches base
load. Special care must be taken to control the steam temperature in order to meet the optimal
steam temperature for fast loading of the ST.
The H-type steam turbine is designed for full-arc admission without the use of a control stage.
This design greatly reduces blade stresses during the start-up process. The combination of
full-arc admission with variable-pressure operation (which has become a standard for HRSGs
in the industry) provides high efficiency, maximum operating flexibility and minimized
maintenance.
In order to provide further flexibility, the Siemens patented Turbine Stress Controller (TSC) is
supplied. The TSC consists of a stress evaluation system coupled with the ST start-up
program incorporating an on-line life cycle counter. It calculates the stress in all critical ST
“thick wall” components (including the valves, HP casing and rotor and the IP rotor)
depending on three different ramp rates, i.e. normal, accelerated and fast. The function of the
TSC is to control the start-up ramp rates so as to minimize material fatigue and at the same
time to calculate the cumulative fatigue of the monitored turbine parts.
The TSC assigns an appropriate number of equivalent starts for each normal, accelerated and
fast start. With this knowledge of the effect of each type of start on the maintenance schedule
of the steam turbine, the owner can make prudent business decisions regarding whether or not
the plant should be used to satisfy transient dispatch requirements.
Steam/Water Cycle and Operational Chemistry
Despite the requirements for an improved cycling capability, power plant owners still expect
base-load plant efficiency levels. This is achieved by retaining the triple-pressure reheat
steam/water cycle (Figure 9).
12 of 12
Power-Gen Asia 2003 ID203 Rev.3
24.07.2003
Figure 9 Triple pressure reheat steam cycle with Benson-OTSG
The cycle design has been thoroughly analyzed and as previously mentioned was first
introduced at the Cottam Development Center. The Benson-OTSG is a once-through steam
generator for the HP and IP part, while the LP section retains a drum-type cycle. This HRSG
configuration requires a combination of pH-control with ammonia and oxygenated treatment.
The oxygenated treatment creates and maintains a protective layer of magnetite and hematite
inside the tubes.
As a further enhancement to rapidly achieve proper steam quality and to support fast start-up,
the cycle incorporates a condensate polisher. The polisher provides high quality feedwater to
the Benson-OTSG thus avoiding deposits in the evaporator tubes and thereby decreasing the
evaporator pressure losses. The condensate is deaerated in the condenser hotwell by vacuum,
while the polisher removes the ammonia, which must then be added to the cycle for proper
pH-adjustment.
The following dosing regime is used:
• Oxygenated Treatment (low ammonia, low oxygen): for the condensate system
• All Volatile Treatment (high ammonia, low oxygen): for the feedwater to the LP-system
• Oxygenated Treatment (low ammonia, high oxygen): for HP- and IP once-through system
13 of 13
Power-Gen Asia 2003 ID203 Rev.3
24.07.2003
The combined oxygen/ammonia treatment with the integrated condensate polisher of the plant
concept has already contributed to the high reliability of Cottam Development Center (Figure
10) and reduced the time to meet steam purity requirements to minutes [4].
Figure 10: Cottam Development Center
BOP Considerations for Fast Start-up/Shutdown and Cycling operation
Let’s reflect now the impact of additional measures that support combined-cycle power plants
in coping with the requirements of fast start-up/shutdown and cycling operation mode. As
most of the readers that are associated with the power industry may already know, these
measures can be acknowledged as industry standards and are also part of drum-type HRSG
cycles. Noteworthy measures that are also applied are:
• Component redundancies
• Auxiliary boiler
• Vacuum pumps
• Stack damper
• Automated drain and vent valves
• Optimized steam piping warm-up concept
• High level of system and plant automation
14 of 14
Power-Gen Asia 2003 ID203 Rev.3
24.07.2003
Benefits A plant designed for increased cycling capability offers operational benefits that will
positively affect the life-cycle costs, due to:
• Increased flexibility
• Fuel savings
Since this plant can be operated in a fast-start, intermediate-load or a base-load mode, there is
a high degree of flexibility for the owner. The ability to rapidly reach dispatchable load allows
the owner to participate in more revenue generation opportunities and allows additional profit
depending on it’s specific contractual conditions.
An advantage that can be quantified are the fuel savings. Due to accelerated start-up, the
improvements significantly reduce start-up fuel. For the economic calculation on NPV-basis a
set of assumptions were made with regard to fuel prices, electrical revenues and interest rates.
Furthermore a load regime and a fixed relation between expected and unexpected starts has
been fixed. This results in savings of approx. € 6 million NPV over 20 years for a once-
through design (Figure 11).
Figure 11 Fuel savings on NPV basis
15 of 15
Power-Gen Asia 2003 ID203 Rev.3
24.07.2003
Conclusions
The single-shaft concept with enhanced cycling capabilities represents an approach for the
market that targets the needs of combined cycle power plants in intermediate duty with
frequent start-up and shut-down cycles, without sacrificing base-load efficiency.
Special detail in system integration using expertise and experience of a full turnkey contractor
is key to the success of the plant design. Controlled steam temperatures and an advanced ST
start-up mode are considered to mitigate ST induced start-up restrictions.
Its improvement in operating flexibility helps power plant owners to be prepared for a
deregulated market and maintain their revenue stream over the uncertainty of the dispatch
requirements.
References
[1] “The real cost of cycling powerplants: What you don’t know will hurt you” by S A
Lefton, P M Besuner, G P Grimsrud, Aptech Engineering, POWER, Nov/December
2002
[2] “Design of High Load Cycling Operation for Combined Cycle Power Plants” by
Andrew Chrusciel, Justin Zachary, Sam Keith: Bechtel Power Corp., Published for
PowerGen International 2001, Las Vegas, NV
[3] “Successful Combined Cycle Debut for Novel Horizontal-Flow Vertical-Tube Benson-
HRSG” by Joachim Franke, Uwe Lenk, Robert Taud: Siemens Power Generation,
Erlangen, Germany; Friedrich Klauke: Babcock Borsig Power, Oberhausen, Germany.
Published in Modern Power Systems, July 2000
[4] “Chemical Operation Experience With The CCPP Cottam” by M. Rziha, B. Senger:
Siemens Power Generation, Erlangen, Germany; S. Merry, A. Greig: Powergen Cottam,
Retford, UK. Published for ESAA-Power Station Chemistry 2002, Rockhampton
Queensland
16 of 16
Power-Gen Asia 2003 ID203 Rev.3
24.07.2003
[5] “Combined Cycle Steam Turbine Operation” by Leo Bize, Harry Martin: Siemens
Westinghouse Power Corporation, Orlando FL; Norbert Henkel, Edwin Gobrecht:
Siemens Power Generation, Muelheim, Germany. Published for 2001 International Joint
Power Conference, June 4-7, New Orleans, LO. JPGC2001/PWR-19127
[6] “An Integrated Combined-Cycle Plant Design that Provides Fast Start and Cycling
Capability at Base-Load Efficiency” by Raymond Baumgartner, Christian Engelbert,
Mathias Groepner, Michael McManus, Erich Schmid: Siemens Westinghouse Power
Corporation, Orlando FL. Published for Electric Power 2003 Conference, March 4-6,
Houston, Texas, USA
17 of 17