cognitive plasticity of aging handout ROUGH...2 2,5 3 3,5 Motivation Optimierung...

9
October 2015 © Ursula M. Staudinger 1 Columbia University Cogni;ve Aging: Opportuni;es and Challenges Ursula M. Staudinger SIEPR Conference Working Longer and Re;rement SIEPR Building Stanford University October 89, 2015 Theore;cal Prelude: The Plas;city of Aging Human Aging in 2015 is only a snapshot in 5me ! Aging and old age has been different in the past and will yet be different in the future. How is this Possible? Human Development is not Determined Biology Socio- Cultural Context & Environment Thought Attitude Behavior Inter- and intraindividual variability due its interactive nature 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Positive Plasticity Typical Trajectory Negative Plasticity Level of Functioning Chronological Age Interactive Nature Creates Room for Plasticity Staudinger, 2015 Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics

Transcript of cognitive plasticity of aging handout ROUGH...2 2,5 3 3,5 Motivation Optimierung...

October  2015  

©  Ursula  M.  Staudinger   1  

Columbia  University                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          

Cogni;ve  Aging:    Opportuni;es  and  Challenges    Ursula  M.  Staudinger  

SIEPR  Conference  Working  Longer  and  Re;rement  SIEPR  Building  Stanford  University  October  8-­‐9,  2015    

Theore;cal  Prelude:  The  Plas;city  of  Aging  

Human  Aging  in  2015  is  only  a  snapshot  in  5me  !  Aging  and  old  age  has  been  different  in  the  past  and  will  yet  be  different  in  the  future.      Chronological  age  is  an  outdated    

4  examples  illustrate  this  impressing  posi;ve  plas;city:  

!     Chronological  age  is  an  outdated  measure    !     Improved  cogni;on  in  old  age    

!     „Old-­‐age  personality“  can  be  changed  !     BUT:  beware  of  nega;ve  plas;city:        the  effect  of  nega;ve  age  stereotypes    

How  is  this  Possible?  Human  Development  is  not  Determined  

Biology

Socio-Cultural

Context & Environment

Thought Attitude Behavior

Inter- and intraindividual variability due its interactive nature

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Positive Plasticity Typical Trajectory Negative Plasticity

Leve

l of F

unct

ioni

ng

Chronological Age

Interactive Nature Creates Room for Plasticity

Staudinger,  2015  Annual  Review  of  Gerontology  and  Geriatrics  

October  2015  

©  Ursula  M.  Staudinger   2  

Pragmatics

30 50 70 90 Age

- 3 - 2 - 1 0 1 2 3

Mechanics

30 50 70 90 Age

- 3 - 2 - 1 0 1 2 3

Baltes, Lindenberger & Staudiger, 2006

Compensation

Knowledge  Structure  Changes  with  Exper;se    From  Novice  to  Expert  

Novice  =  1  Piece  of  Informa;on  

Expert  =  1  Piece  of  Informa;on  

Experience  Compensates  Decline  in  Mechanics  

Salthouse  1984  Journal  of  Exp.  Psychology  

Interkey  Interval  (m

sec)  

Chronological  Age  

Typing  

Choice  Reac;on  Time  

6  5  4  

3  2  1  

0              

Nega;

ve  Correla;o

n  Age    

Preview  Window  small   large  

Pragmatics

30 50 70 90 Age

- 3 - 2 - 1 0 1 2 3

Mechanics

30 50 70 90 Age

- 3 - 2 - 1 0 1 2 3

Compensation

Baltes, Lindenberger & Staudiger, 2006

October  2015  

©  Ursula  M.  Staudinger   3  

Mechanics: Speed for New Information

30 50 70 90 Age - 3 - 2 - 1 0 1 2 3

Age-­‐Related  Decline  in  Cogni;ve  Mechanics    in  Previous  Cohorts  

Func;onal    Threshold  

Decline  of  cogni;ve  mechanics  starts  later            Health  status  of  80  yrs.  old  =  70  yrs.-­‐old  20  yrs.  Ago  

Increases  in  intellectual  func;oning  across  cohorts            Educa;on,  nutri;on  

Decline  in  the  mechanics  is  less  pronounced              Training  interven;ons  (task  exercise  +  strategy,  

                       physical  exercise)  

Three  Facilitators  of  Posi;ve  Cogni;ve  Plas;city  

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

Japan

Sweden Iceland

Norway

Australia Netherlands Switzerland

New Zealand

1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020

Max.  A

v.  Life

 expectancy  (yrs)  

Oeppen  &  Vaupel    Science  2002    

updated  

Longevity  Revolu;on  Socie;es  of  Longer  Lives  

                   Christensen  et  al.,  2007  

dependent yrs.

active yrs.

October  2015  

©  Ursula  M.  Staudinger   4  

Decline  of  cogni;ve  mechanics  starts  later            Health  status  of  80  yrs.  old  =  70  yrs.  old  20  yrs.  Ago  

Increases  in  intellectual  func;oning  across  cohorts            e.g.,  Educa;on,  nutri;on  

Decline  in  the  mechanics  is  less  pronounced              Training  interven;ons  (task  exercise  +  strategy,  

                       physical  exercise)  

Three  Facilitators  of  Posi;ve  Cogni;ve  Plas;city  Plas;city  Through  Cultural-­‐Historical  Influences    

(e.g.,  Nutri;on,  Educa;on)    

Performance    at  Age  23  yrs.  

Seattle Longitudinal Study; z.B. Schaie, 1996

1.5  SD  across  50  years  

Spatial Reasoning

Speed

Fluency

Vocabulary

Birth Year

T Va

lues

Also  Progress  in  the  Oldest  Old  (93  &  95  yrs.)...    

Christensen et al., 2013 The Lancet Skirbekk, Stonawski, Bonsang, & Staudinger

Intelligence, 2013

2002 2042

Popu

latio

n Av

erag

e Im

med

iate

Rec

all

October  2015  

©  Ursula  M.  Staudinger   5  

0,168

0,185

0,155

0,160

0,165

0,170

0,175

0,180

0,185

0,190

Males Females

num

ber o

f wor

ds

Five-­‐yearly  cohort  improvement  required  for  cogni;on  to  be  constant  un;l  2042  

Observed cognitive improvement by cohorts

over a five-year period

Skirbekk, Stonawski, Bonsang, & Staudinger Intelligence, 2013

Projec;ng  average  cogni5ve  levels  (50+)  in  UK  under  condi;ons  of  popula;on  aging  if  the  posi;ve  cohort  trends  (Flynn  effect)  observed  from  2002  to  2008  con;nue.    

2002 2042

Popu

latio

n Av

erag

e Im

med

iate

Rec

all

Decline  of  cogni;ve  mechanics  starts  later            Health  status  of  80  yrs.  old  =  70  yrs.  old  20  yrs.  Ago  

Increases  in  intellectual  func;oning  across  cohorts            e.g.,  Educa;on,  nutri;on  

Decline  in  the  mechanics  is  less  pronounced              Training  interven;ons  (task  exercise  +  strategy,  

                       physical  exercise)  

Three  Facilitators  of  Posi;ve  Cogni;ve  Plas;city  

Baltes & Kliegl, 1992

0 10 20 30 40

30 25 20 15 10 5 0

young

Session ( ■ = Instruction , ◆ = Training)

old (60-75 Years)

No.

of

Wor

ds R

ecal

led

2,5

14

Training  Compensates  Losses  in  the  Mechanics  Classical  Evidence  for  Exogenous  Resilience  

October  2015  

©  Ursula  M.  Staudinger   6  

Neuronal Correlate of Training Gains (Method of Loci): Compensation

Difference Posttest – Pretest during Retrieval

Nyberg et al., 2003

-20 -10

0 10 20 30 40

Speed of Information Processing Dif

fere

nce

Pre

Pos

t Tr

aini

ng

Nordic Walking Coordination Relaxation (*)

Voelcker-­‐Rehage,  Godde  &  Staudinger,  2011  Fron?ers  of  Neuroscience  

Physical  Training  Interven;ons  (6,  12  months)  Modify  the  Cogni;ve  Mechanics  >60yrs.  ?  

Nordic Walking – CG & 3. – 1. MP

SFG

ACC

Voelcker-­‐Rehage,  Godde  &  Staudinger,  2011  Fron?ers  in    Human  Neuroscience  

val/val  val/met  met/met  

Fitness  

Particularly for val/val carriers higher motor fitness is associated with better cognitive performance

Indica5on  for  Personalized  Plas5city  Effec;vity  of  Physical  Interven;on  Depends  also  on  Gene;c  Predisposi;on  

Fitness  Interven;on  

Cogni;ve  Performance  

Gene;c  Predisposi;on  (COMT  Gene)  

Voelcker-­‐Rehage,  Jeltsch,  Godde,  &  Staudinger,  2015  

October  2015  

©  Ursula  M.  Staudinger   7  

Mechanics:  Speed  for  New  Informa;on    

30 50 70 90 Age - 3 - 2 - 1 0 1 2 3

Age-­‐Related  Decline  in  Cogni;ve  Mechanics    in  Previous  Cohorts  

Func;onal    Threshold  

2787,75

1629,78

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

low WTM high WTM

Aver

age

Rea

ctio

n Ti

me

in M

S

WTM

Reaction Time

24,23

41,45

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

low WTM high WTM

No.

Cor

rect

Tri

als i

n 80

sec.

WTM

No. Correct Trials

Few Changes Many Changes Work-Related Actvities

Few Changes Many Changes Work-Related Actvities

45,41  

1629,78  

Sample: Assembly Line Workers, 16 yrs. Treatment, N=38 Controlled for: Baseline Cognition & Openness, Leisuretime Activities

Oltmanns,  Godde,  &  Staudinger,  submiled  

Identical Pictures

Caudatum

ACC

Medial-frontaler Gyrus Insula

Same areas that show most age-related decline in volume

Oltmanns,  Godde,  &  Staudinger,  submiled  

15 25 35 45 55 65 75 Years Age

Entry

Modified Task

Modified Task

New Task

Retirement + Flexible Work Schedule

Family Phase

Sabbatical

Professional Reorientation, New Tasks

Alternative: Vertical Career

Alternative: Work-Life-Balance

Alternative: Horizontal Career Further Education

Cognitive “Training” through Varied Work Biographies “Challenge it or Loose it”

Staudinger & Kocka (2009). More Years, More Life

October  2015  

©  Ursula  M.  Staudinger   8  

Yet  Another  Challenge.....  

Positive Perspective on Old Age

Negative Perspective on Old Age

Negative Own Old-Age

Image

Positive Own Old-Age Image

7 yrs. difference in survival controlled  for:              obj.  health,  SES,  SWB  etc.  

par;al  mediator:      will  to  live  

Lower  Survival  Probability  (Median)  due  to  Nega;ve  Own  Old-­‐Age  Image  

Levy et al., 2000

Older  Employees  in  Companies  with  Nega;ve  Old-­‐Age  Stereotype  less  Mo;vated  and  less  Produc;ve  

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

Motivation Optimierung -0.35

-0.3

-0.25

-0.2

-0.15

-0.1

-0.05

0High Ageism Low Ageism

Strong Negative Old-Age Stereotype

Weak Negative Old-Age Stereotype

Productivity

Noack & Staudinger, 2009; N = 647; controlled for Age and BMI

η2= .03

η2= .02

η2= .02

October  2015  

©  Ursula  M.  Staudinger   9  

Summary  Cogni;ve  Plas;city  

!  Yes,  there  is  plas;city  in  the  cogni;ve  mechanics.  

!  Underlying  mechanisms  less  clear:  !  Compensa;on    (e.g.,  learning  a  strategy,  mo;va;on)    

!  Physical  reac;va;on    !  More  systemic  longitudinal,  ideally  country  compara;ve,  data  sets  are  needed.  

!  Cogni;on  in  vivo:  Measurement  challenges  yet  to  be  mastered