Coexistence of weather radars and telecommunication systems · URSI AT-RASC, Gran Canaria, 31 May...

URSI AT-RASC, Gran Canaria, 31 May 2018

Coexistence of weather

radars and

telecommunication systems

Mattia Vaccarono, V. Chandrasekar, Renzo Bechini, Roberto Cremonini

2nd URSI Atlantic Radio Science Meeting

Gran Canaria 31 May 2018


Summary

1. Introduction

2. RFIs at C-band

1. Arpa Piemonte Bric della

Croce radar

2. RFI identification

3. Time series analysis

3. RFIs at X-band

1. Arpa Piemonte mobile radar

2. RFI identifiation

3. LTE features

4. Time series analysis

4. DFW X-band radar network

5. Conclusions


Introduction

RFIs at C-band RFIs at X-band

• In-band emissions from HIPERLAN systems

(HIgh PErformance Radio LAN)

• Towers location available from Arpa database of

electromagnetic sources

• In-field measurements to retrieve RFIs SSID.

• Method to identify the RFI sources. Check of

standards requirements compliance.

• Time series analysis for RFI removal.

• Likely spurious emissions from 1.8GHz mobile

communication systems

RFIs day-night pattern Base Station radiated

power

Towers location available from Arpa database of


Time series analysis show RFI duration

comparable to LTE symbol duration


Introduction Frequency allocation defined in the International Telecommunication Union (ITU)

radio regulations (latest version 2016).

C-band weather radars widely used in Italy and Europe. These radars share the

frequency spectrum with RLAN and WLAN, especially HIPERLAN systems.

The 5GHz RLAN were authorized in the 5150-5350MHz and 5470-5725MHz band

after World Radiocommunication Conference 2003 (WRC-03).

Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) is a mandatory feature for WLAN/HIPERLAN

systems to mitigate interferences with weather radars.

No civil communication allowed in the 9300-9500MHz band.

Spurious emissions defined from standards (e.g. 3GPP – LTE, Table 9.2.1.2.1-1)

C-b

an

dX

-ba

nd


C-band RFIGrowth of HIPERLAN

towers transmitting in

Piemonte region (from

Arpa database).

May 2018: about 1100 towers


C-band radar -0.1° elevation

PPI acquired the 9 December 2010 at -0.1° elevation from Bric della Croce radar (TO). The same radar scan,

acquired after four year is reported in figure b. It is remarkable the interference increase.

a) b)


C-band radar 4.4° elevation

a) b)

PPI acquired the 9 December 2010 4.4° elevation from Bric della Croce radar (TO). The same radar scan, acquired

after four year is reported in figure b. It is remarkable the interference increase.


C-band RFI Identification

Location of towers transmitting in the C-

band (green points) and Bric della Croce

radar (violet pentagon ).

The figure shows the towers selected by

the interference zones model:

1. Antennas pointing to the radar

2. Tower location is visible from the radar.

Amount of selected towers: 256

Focus on this particular tower.


C-band RFI Identification

Bric della Croce radar

WLANExample of tower in

optical visibility with Bric

della Croce radar.

During the 2015 in-field

measurements with the

Italian Ministry of

Economic Development,

comparing the SSID

with the available

information, these

sources were found to

interfere the Bric della

Croce radar.


C-band RFI time series

Time series of Ih and Iv of the selected interference.

Ih (V)


C-band RFI time series

1st row: Iv vs Ih and Qv vs Qh plots.

Note that the data are distributed along the

-45° slope line. The RFI source is slant

polarized. Antennas slant polarization

reduces interferences and increase

performances in dense wireless

environments.

2nd row: scattergram I vs Q for h-pol and v-

pol. Unable to see any pattern.


X-band radar

Mobile radar used for research purposes.

Currently located near Vercelli, 60km North-East of Turin

Operational frequency: 9.366GHz

RFIs started from 2014, continuously

increasing.

Day-night pattern: RFIs received from

approximately 6 a.m. to midnight


X-band RFI

Maximum of echoes

received during a day (in

colors) overlapped on the

map.

The black dots represents

the Base Station of a

mobile operator

transmitting the LTE

1.8GHz.

The lines represent the ray

between the radar and the

B.S.

Note that the radar range

has been divided by 2.

Z (dBZ)


X-band RFI – LTE signal

OFDM based signal. Basic unit in which data are transmitted is the

LTE symbol with QAM, QPSK a CAZAC sequences as possible

modulations. Total duration of the symbol is 71.3μs and 71.9μs for

special symbols.

Down-link of the 1860-1880MHz LTE signal:

1.8732GHz x 5 = 9.366GHz which is the radar operating frequency

Maximum spurious level at X-band: -30dBm ETSI-TS 136 106 V10.0.0

This particular signal is not transmitted from midnight to 6 a.m. in

the radar area.


X-band RFI – time seriesZ (dBZ) Ih (V)


X-band RFI – time series

Scattergram I vs Q for h-pol and v-pol.

Data distributed along a circle.

Is this modulation comparable to LTE symbols?

Iv vs Ih and Qv vs Qh plots. Note that the

data are distributed elliptically along the

-45° slope line. Linearly polarized signal

reflected by the environment surfaces

during its path to the radar.

RFI duration: 71.7 μs


X-band RFI – time seriesReference Signals (RS) and Primary

Synchronization Signals (P-SS) may be

constructed from a Constant Amplitude Zero

AutoCorrelation sequence named Zadoff-Chu

sequence

ZC properties:

1. Constant amplitude

2. cyclic auto-correlation of each ZC

sequence results in a single impulse at

time offset zero.

1. RFI amplitude vary less than 5%;

2. RFI H-pol. autocorrelation is a single pulse at time lag zero.


DFW X-band radars networkAddison radarCleburne radar


DFW X-band radars networkDFW RFIs features:

• Few interferences received per day

• High time and spatial variability

ƒ (MHz)Uplink (MHz)

(Mobile to Base)

Downlink (MHz)

(Base to Mobile)

Europe 1800 1710.2 – 1784.8 1805.2 – 1879.8

North America 1900 1850.2 – 1909.8 1930.2 – 1989.8

What is the RFI source?

No downlink communication allowed in the 1800MHz band.

Uplink of the LTE, user devices low power.

Could telecommunications affect CASA radars as Arpa X-band radar?


Conclusions

C-band radar:

• Broadband internet access towers cause

severe interferences

• I-Q data show high variability in the

interference duty cycle

• SSID may help to identify the interference

sources using the regional database of


• ITU standards compliance

X-band radar:

• Day-night pattern of the received

interferences

• No in-band transmissions allowed out-of-

band or spurious emissions

• I-Q data analysis show high correlation due

to artificial source. The polarization state

(slant-pol) is widely used in mobile Base

Stations.

• Likely due to 4G mobile communications

• In-field measurement to identify which are

the interfering base stations.First step of the enhanced RFI removal tool


Bibliography

• Reed, J. H., Clegg, A. W., Padaki, A. V., Yang, T., Nealy, R., Dietrich, C., Mearns, D. M. (2016). On

the co-existence of TD-LTE and radar over 3.5 GHz band: An experimental study. IEEE

Wireless Communications Letters, 5(4), 368-371.

• Joe, P., Scott, J., Sydor, J., Brandão, A., & Yongacoglu, A. (2005, October). Radio Local Area

Network (RLAN) and C-Band Weather Radar Interference Studies. In Proc. 32nd AMS Radar

Conference on Radar Meteorology.

• Lake, J. L., Yeary, M., & Curtis, C. D. (2016, May). Effects of radio frequency interference

mitigation strategies on meteorological data. In Radar Conference (RadarConf), 2016 IEEE

(pp. 1-5). IEEE

• Horváth, Z., & Varga, D. (2009, October). Elimination of RLAN interference on weather radars

by channel allocation in 5 GHz band. In Ultra Modern Telecommunications & Workshops, 2009.

ICUMT'09. International Conference on (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

• Joseph, W., Pareit, D., Vermeeren, G., Naudts, D., Verloock, L., Martens, L., & Moerman, I. (2013).

Determination of the duty cycle of WLAN for realistic radio frequency electromagnetic field

exposure assessment. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 111(1), 30-36.


Bibliography

• TRISTANT, P. (2009, September). RLAN 5 GHz interference to weather radars in Europe. In

ITU/WMO Seminar on use of radio spectrum for meteorology: Weather, Water and Climate monitoring

and prediction.

• Saltikoff, E., Cho, J. Y., Tristant, P., Huuskonen, A., Allmon, L., Cook, R.,Joe, P. (2016). The threat to

weather radars by wireless technology. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 97(7), 1159-

1167.

• Keranen, R., Rojas, L., Nyberg, P. E. T. R. I. (2013). Progress in mitigation of WLAN interferences at

weather radar. In 36th Conf. on Radar Meteorology.

• LTE: Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); User Equipment (UE) radio transmission and

reception ETSI TS 136 101 Technical Specification.

• LTE in a Nutshell: The Physical Layer, 2010, Telesystem Innovations Inc.

• http://webgis.arpa.piemonte.it/campi_elettromagnetici_webapp/

• https://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/ntia00-40.pdf

Coexistence of weather radars and telecommunication systems · URSI AT-RASC, Gran Canaria, 31 May...

Documents

Transcript of Coexistence of weather radars and telecommunication systems · URSI AT-RASC, Gran Canaria, 31 May...