Cobomarsen as a Therapy for Mycosis Fungoides...+ microRNA-targeted therapy is focused on disease...
Transcript of Cobomarsen as a Therapy for Mycosis Fungoides...+ microRNA-targeted therapy is focused on disease...
Cobomarsen as a Therapy
for Mycosis Fungoides
C O N F I D E N T I A L
2
Content
+ miR-155 and Cobomarsen Mechanism Overview
+ Phase I Data in Mycosis Fungoides
+ Phase I Data in ATLL
+ Cobomarsen Phase II Overview (SOLAR)
Confidential Pg. 3 3
miR-155 and Cobomarsen Mechanism Overview
C O N F I D E N T I A L
microRNAs Regulate Network
Biology to Maintain Homeostasis
4
+ microRNAs have been evolutionarily selected to
regulate networks of genes
+ microRNAs are dysregulated in many diseases
+ Dysregulation of microRNAs is associated with
alteration of downstream gene networks and disease
+ microRNA-targeted therapy is focused on disease
modification by restoring homeostasis to
dysregulated processes
+ microRNA therapeutics are particularly suited for
complex, multigenic disorders
Conventional Therapies
(Small molecules, Antibodies, siRNA, etc)
Single molecule as target
microRNA-based Therapies
Network (pathway) as target
% IN
HIB
ITIO
N
100
50
0
C O N F I D E N T I A L
miR-155 Regulates Disease Gene Pathways Implicated in Mycosis Fungoides
5
↑ miR-155
Proliferation
Apoptosis
T-cell activation
Conventional Therapy
(e.g., idelalisib)
Cobomarsen
Multiple survival and
immune pathways activated
One survival
pathway inactivatedMultiple survival and immune
pathways inactivated
idelalisib
Proliferation
Apoptosis
T-cell activation
Proliferation
Apoptosis
T-cell activation
PI3K/AKT
JAK/STAT
NF-kB
RAS/MAPK
PI3K/AKT
JAK/STAT
NF-kB
RAS/MAPK
PI3K/AKT
JAK/STAT
NF-kB
RAS/MAPK
C O N F I D E N T I A L
miR-155 is Increased in Multiple Hematologic Malignancies
6
MIR-155 EXPRESSION
C O N F I D E N T I A L
7
miR-155 Expression is Linked to Multiple Hematologic Malignancies
• EXPRESSION OF miR-155 IS SUFFICIENT to drive B-cell expansion and formation of B-cell lymphoma
THE HOST GENE FOR miR-155 (BIC) was identified as a proto-oncogene for
virally-induced B-cell lymphomas
• ELEVATED miR-155 expression correlates with poor prognosismiR-155 IS HIGHLY EXPRESSED in
multiple hematologic malignancies
• THERAPEUTIC INHIBITION OF miR-155 reduces proliferation and increases apoptosis in hematologic cancer cell lines
miR-155 IS REGULATED by NF-kB, PI3K/AKT, and JAK/STAT, and functions in
a feedback loop with these survival pathways
C O N F I D E N T I A L
Cobomarsen Affects Pathophysiology of Multiple Hematological Malignancies
8
+ Cobomarsen is a miR-155 inhibitor that inactivates multiple disease-
relevant pathways
+ Cobomarsen can enable induction of pro-apoptotic and anti-proliferative
pathways in these cancer cells while not causing global immunosuppression
+ Cobomarsen may provide long term benefit with few potential resistance
mechanisms by affecting multiple signaling pathways in cancer cells
C O N F I D E N T I A L
miR-155 is Increased in Mycosis Fungoides Lesions
9
+ miR-155 is upregulated in MF
+ miR-155 expression
correlates with lesion severity*
+ miR-155 upregulation was
confirmed in miRagen’s
Phase 1 Clinical Trial in MF
N=10 N =13 N =21N =13
*In collaboration with Madeleine Duvic (MD Anderson)
COBOMARSEN IS A
MIR-155 INHIBITOR
MIR-155 COPY NUMBER BY
LESION TYPEMIR-155 COPY NUMBER IN MF
LESIONS
C O N F I D E N T I A L
CobomarsenReverses the Disease Gene Signature in Mycosis Fungoides
10
GENES REGULATED IN MF LESIONS
COMPARED TO NORMAL SKIN
Patch PlaqueTumorMF Cells+ Cobo
T cell activation,
survival signaling,
cytokine signaling
Cell cycle
checkpoint
regulation
+ T cell activation, survival signaling, and
cytokine signaling genes ↑ in MF lesions
o REDUCED by cobomarsen
+ Cell cycle checkpoint genes ↓
in MF lesions
o INCREASED by cobomarsen
C O N F I D E N T I A L
Cobomarsen Reduces
Proliferation and
Increases Apoptosis in
Cell Lines Derived
From CTCL Patient
11
+ Cobomarsen ↓ proliferation = bexarotene
+ Cobomarsen ↑ apoptosis > bexarotene
+ Potential for additivity/synergy with bexarotene and other therapeutics for CTCL
0 2 4 6 8 10 120
200
400
600
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Days
% C
han
ge C
om
pare
d t
o U
ntr
eate
d a
t D
ay 1
0 2 4 6 8 10 120
200
400
600
800
Days
% c
han
ge c
om
pare
d t
o u
ntr
eate
d a
t D
ay 1
0 2 4 6 8 10 120
200
400
600
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Days
% C
han
ge C
om
pare
d t
o U
ntr
eate
d a
t D
ay 1
Untreated
Bexarotene
Cobomarsen
0 2 4 6 8 10 120
200
400
600
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Days
% C
han
ge C
om
pare
d t
o U
ntr
eate
d a
t D
ay 1
Untreated
Bexarotene
Cobomarsen
PROLIFERATION APOPTOSIS
C O N F I D E N T I A L
Cobomarsen Clinical Program in Hematological Malignancies
12
CTCL MYCOSIS FUNGOIDES
MIR-155-HIGH NON-HODGKINS
LYMPHOMA (NHL)/LEUKEMIA
Dose, Schedule Optimization
and Response Durability in CTCL
Para
llel In
dic
ation
Expan
sio
n in
Ph1
mPoC cPoC Futility
AnalysisPART B/C
SYSTEMIC
PART A
LOCAL
ATLL
DLBCL
CLL
Ph 1 CTCL Ph 2 CTCL
Ph 2 in NHL / Leukemia
C O N F I D E N T I A L
Cobomarsen Shows Favorable Tolerability
13
No serious adverse events attributed to
cobomarsen in CTCL
No acute inflammatory toxicities
No significant abnormalities found in liver, kidney or blood
In Total, 68 Patients
(CTCL, ATLL, DLBCL,
and CLL from Ph1 and
CTCL SOLAR) Have
Been Exposed To
Cobomarsen For Up To
2.5 Years
+ COBOMARSEN HAS BEEN GENERALLY SAFE
and well tolerated
o Multiple patients receiving more than a year
of therapy
o Total of 1254 cumulative doses
(across 68 patients)
+ NO SIGNIFICANT LAB ABNORMALITIES found
in liver function, kidney function, thyroid function
and platelet counts
+ NO EVIDENCE OF METABOLIC or
HEMATOLOGICAL toxicities
+ NO EVIDENCE OF GLOBAL
IMMUNOSUPPRESSION
+ NOVEL OLIGONUCLEOTIDE drug class
(Data Cutoff July 23, 2019)
Confidential Pg. 14 14
Cobomarsen
Phase I Results in
CTCL
Parts A and B
C O N F I D E N T I A L
15
PART A
Intra-tumoral delivery
of cobomarsen
(75 mg dose)
PART B
Systemic SC or IV delivery
to determine optimal
potential dose (300, 600
and 900 mg+ dose)
OBJECTIVES
+ PRIMARY Safety and
tolerability
+ SECONDARY PK
+ EXPLORATORY PD,
histopathology, lesion
morphology
Cobomarsen: Two-part Phase 1 CTCL Study
PRETREATMENT
BIOPSY
PRETREATMENT
BIOPSY
PLACEBO COBOMARSEN
PLACEBO
BIOPSY
COBOMARSEN
BIOPSY BIOPSY
COBOMARSEN
SC or IV
PART A PART B
C O N F I D E N T I A L
16
Phase I Clinical Trial Patient Flow and Disposition
SCREEN FAILURES = 8
ENROLLMENT CLOSED/MISSED DEADLINE = 1
DID NOT MEET I/E CRITERIA = 7
EXCLUDED FROM EFFICACY ANALYSIS DUE TO SEZARY SX = 1
SCREENED = 51 ENROLLED = 41
PART A: INTRA-LESIONAL
PART B: SYSTEMIC
ENROLLED = 6
ENROLLED = 37
COMPLETED = 5
DISCONTINUED DUE TO AE = 1
RECEIVED > 6 DOSES PER AMENDED PROTOCOL = 25
ONGOING = 1
COMPLETED = 9
DISCONTINUED = 25
LOST TO FOLLOW- UP = 2
TREATED = 37
RE-ENROLLED = 2
C O N F I D E N T I A L
Phase I CTCL
Baseline Demographics
17
PART A n (%) PART B n (%) TOTAL n (%)
SEX
Female 1 (17) 13 (35) 14 (34.1)
Male 5 (83) 24 (65) 27 (65.9)
AGE
N 6 37 41a
Mean (SD) 59 (6) 58 (14) 58.4 (13.1)
Median 61 59 59
Min, Max 50,64 21,85 21,85
RACE
Asian 0 (0) 1 (3) 1 (2.4)
Black 1 (17) 6 (16) 7 (17.1)
Not reported 1 (17) 0 (0) 1 (2.4)
Other, specify 0 (0) 2 (5) 2 (4.9)
White/Caucasian 4 (67) 28 (76) 31 (75.6)
(Data Cutoff July 23, 2019)
a 41 unique individuals
enrolled in the study
43 subjects total with
2 Part A subjects re-enrolled in Part B
C O N F I D E N T I A L
18
Number of Subjects with Grade 3/4 and SAEs (n = 41a)
SYSTEM ORGAN CLASS ADVERSE EVENT (PT) SAE GRADE 3/4
Blood and lymphatic system disorders Neutropenia* 5
Leukopenia 2
Lymphopenia 1
Metabolism and nutrition disorders Hypertriglyceridaemia 3
Hypophosphataemia 2
Hypercalacemia 1 1
Hypokalaemia 1
Hyponatraemia 1
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified Tumor flare 2
Tumor pain 1
Cardiac disorders Angina pectoris 1 1
Coronary artery disease 1 1
Palpitations 1
Investigations Blood uric acid Increased 1
Lymphocyte count
decreased1
Transaminases increased 1
Infections and infestations Cellulitis 1 1
Sepsis 1 1
Skin infection 1 1
Renal and urinary disorders Acute kidney injury 1
Proteinuria 1
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders Orthopnea 1
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Erythema 1
Pruritus 1
Rash 1
TOTAL 4 17
Phase I CTCL
Grade 3, 4 and SAEs in Parts A and B
a 41 unique individuals
enrolled in the study 43
subjects total with 2 Part A
subjects re-enrolled in
Part B
b Neutropenia is transient,
mostly in subjects on
concomitant medications
that had Grade 1-2 neutropenia at baseline
(Data Cutoff July 23, 2019)
C O N F I D E N T I A L
19
Adverse Events in ≥ 10% of Subjects
ADVERSE EVENT (PT) TOTAL (41a) n (%)
Fatigue 11 (26.8)
Neutropeniab 8 (19.5)
Headache 8 (19.5)
Nausea 7 (17.1)
Injection site pain 6 (14.6)
Back Pain 5 (12.2)
Constipation 5 (12.2)
Diarrhea 5 (12.2)
Oropharangeal pain 5 (12.2)
Tumor flare 5 (12.2)
Upper respiratory tract infection 5 (12.2)
Phase I CTCL
Most Frequent AEs Reported in Parts A and B
a 41 unique individuals
enrolled in the study 43
subjects total with 2 Part A
subjects re-enrolled in
Part B
b Neutropenia is transient,
mostly in subjects on
concomitant medications
that had Grade 1-2 neutropenia at baseline
(Data Cutoff July 23, 2019)
C O N F I D E N T I A L
20
Phase I CTCL
Most Frequent AEs Reported in Monotherapy and Combination Therapy Patients
a 41 unique individuals
enrolled in the study 43
subjects total with 2 Part A
subjects re-enrolled in
Part B
b Neutropenia is transient,
mostly in subjects on
concomitant medications
that had Grade 1-2 neutropenia at baseline
Adverse Events in ≥ 10% of Subjects
Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy
PREFERRED TERMMONO (15)
n (%)
COMBO (26)
n (%)
TOTAL (41a)
n (%)
Fatigue 4 (26.7) 7 (26.9) 11 (26.8)
Neutropeniab 1 (6.7) 7 (26.9) 8 (19.5)
Headache 4 (26.7) 4 (15.4) 8 (19.5)
Nausea 1 (6.7) 6 (23.1) 7 (17.1)
Injection site pain 2 (13.3) 4 (15.4) 6 (14.6)
Back Pain 2 (13.3) 3 (11.5) 5 (12.2)
Constipation 3 (20.0) 2 (7.7) 5 (12.2)
Diarrhea 2 (13.3) 3 (11.5) 5 (12.2)
Oropharangeal pain 2 (13.3) 3 (11.5) 5 (12.2)
Tumor flare 2 (13.3) 3 (11.5) 5 (12.2)
Upper respiratory tract infection 2 (13.3) 3 (11.5) 5 (12.2)
(Data Cutoff July 23, 2019)
C O N F I D E N T I A L
Cobomarsen Reverses the Disease Gene Signature And Reduces Malignant Cell Clonality in Mycosis Fungoides Patients
21
Survival
signaling
C O N F I D E N T I A L
22
Phase I CTCL Thirty-three of Thirty-six Patients (92%) Treated Systemically with Cobomarsen Have Shown mSWAT Score Improvement
-100
-90
-80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Be
st
Ch
an
ge
in
mS
WA
T S
co
re (
%)
300 mg
600 mg
900 mg
* treatment ongoing
*
*
56
0
12
6
68
NE
NE
49
5
21
4
58
2
39
315
4
35
7
18
1
48
52
NE
14
8
IV Infusion IV BolusSC
STAGE
BASELINE mSWAT
DOSES
1A 2A 1B 1B 2B 1A 2B 1B 1B 2B 2B 1B 2B 3A 1B 2A 2B 1B 2B 2B 2B 1B 1B 1B 1B 1B 1A 1A 2B 2A 1B 3B 2A 2A 1B 1B
6 103 43 20 2 2 47 17 22 18 20 33 9 178 100 78 58 18 6 11 178 43 82 54 27 180 6 5 86 85 54 71 59 18 132 66
9 3 6 6 6 6 6 85 79 6 7 17 11 14 12 9 6 13 6 11 9 56 29 34 27 77 26 41 5 10 6 10 27 32 9 33
*
(Data Cutoff January 9, 2019)
C O N F I D E N T I A L
23
Phase I CTCL
63%
Patients Treated
with Cobomarsen
Administered
as a 300 mg
IV-infusion
Achieved a PR
Reached ORR450%
-100
-90
-80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
Ch
an
ge
in
mS
WA
T S
co
re (
%)
300 mg IV-inf
*
* Treatment is ongoing
ORR4 ORR4 ORR4
214
582
393148
NE
ORR4
STAGE
DOSES
1B 1B 2B 2B 1B 1B 1B 1A
17 13 11 9 34 27 77 26
300 mg IV-inf *Treatment ongoing
ORR4 ORR4 ORR4 ORR4
NE
148393
*
582214
C O N F I D E N T I A L
Phase I CTCL Cobomarsen Substantially Reduces Lesion Severity Following IV Administration
24
C1D1 Pretreatment
CAILS: 12
C3D1
CAILS: 3
C6D1
CAILS: 0
C12D1
CAILS: 0
C O N F I D E N T I A L
Phase I CTCL
Cobomarsen Shows
Similar Efficacy When
Administered as Monotherapy
or in Combination with stable regimens of other CTCL
systemic therapies
25
CONCOMITANT MEDICATION
Bexarotene (N=12)
Interferon-alfa (N=2)
Methotrexate (N=2)
Other* (N=6)
*Other medications include single patients on
pralatrexate, methoxsalen, brentuximab,
gemcitabine, gamma interferon or romidepsin
C O N F I D E N T I A L
26
+ 15 out of 17 (88%)
patients saw an
improvement in their
mean Skindex-29
score
+ Improvements mostly
occurred in patients
that received > 6
doses of cobomarsen
Phase I MFQuality of Life Improved as Measured by Skindex-29 Total Score
Stage 1A 1B 2A 2A 2A 2B 1B 2A 1B 2A 1B 2B 1B 2A 1B 1B 2B
Baseline mSWAT 5 27 18 10 6 6 66 59 82 78 132 18 180 85 54 43 58
# doses rec’d 56 27 32 103 26 6 33 27 29 9 9 6 89 10 6 56 6
C O N F I D E N T I A L
Phase I MF Clinical Trial of Cobomarsen
27
Investigators
Francine M. Foss
Yale Cancer Center
New Haven, CT
Christiane Querfeld
City of Hope
Duarte, CA
Lauren Pinter-Brown
University of California,
Irvine
Irvine, CA
Joan Guitart
Feinberg School of Medicine
Northwestern University
Chicago, IL
Auris Huen
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX
Theresa Pacheco
University of Colorado
Aurora, CO
Basem M. William
Division of Hematology
The Ohio State University
Columbus, OH
Herbert Eradat
University of California,
Los Angeles
Los Angeles, CA
Youn Kim
Stanford Cancer Institute
Stanford University
Palo Alto, CA
Bradley Haverkos
University of Colorado
Aurora, CO
Jennifer DeSimone
Inova
Fairfax, VA
Pierluigi Porcu
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, PA
Ahmad Halwani
Huntsman Cancer Center
Salt Lake City, UT
28
Cobomarsen
Phase I Results in
ATLL
Part F
C O N F I D E N T I A L
29
Epidemiology of Adult T-cell Leukemia/Lymphoma
Arch Pathol Lab Med 2014;138-282
Blood Advances, 2018 (March27); 2(6)
+ Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) is a mature
peripheral T-cell neoplasm caused by human T-cell
leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1)
+ HTLV-1 establishes lifelong latency in human
T-cells (50-70 years) before development of ATLL
+ Malignant transformation leading to ATLL occurs in
HTLV-1–infected individuals with a cumulative
lifetime risk of 2.1% for women and 6.6% for men
+ The median survival time for acute ATLL patients is
reported from 4.1 to 8.3 months, approximately 10
months for lymphomatous ATLL and 27 to 67
months for chronic unfavorable ATLL
C O N F I D E N T I A L
ATLL has a High Expression of miR-155
30
MIR-155 EXPRESSION
C O N F I D E N T I A L
31
The Role of miR-155 in ATLL
Normal
Normal
Normal
Acute PBMC
Acute PBMC
Acute LN
Acute PBMC
miR-155 is Upregulated in Patient PBMCs
or Lymph Biopsy (n = 4)+ miR-155 upregulation has
been reported in HTLV-1 cell
lines and ex vivo tumor cells
from ATLL patients
+ Increased expression of
miR-155-5p enhances the
growth of HTLV-1 infected
T-cells
Yeung et al, Cancer Res 2008
C O N F I D E N T I A L
32
Cobomarsen Reduces Proliferation and Induces Apoptosis in a Dose-Dependent Manner in an HTLV-1+ CTCL Cell Line
0.1 1 10 1000
20
40
60
80
100
120
uM
% c
han
ge c
om
pare
d t
o u
ntr
eate
d
0.1 1 10 1000
250
500
750
1000
1250
uM
% c
han
ge c
om
pare
d t
o u
ntr
eate
d0 2 4 6 8 1 0 1 2
0
2 0 0
4 0 0
6 0 0
2 0 0 0
4 0 0 0
6 0 0 0
8 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0
D a y s
% C
ha
ng
e C
om
pa
re
d t
o U
ntr
ea
ted
at
Da
y 1
M R G -1 0 6
U n tre a te dUntreated
Cobomarsen (0.1-100 µM)
APOPTOSIS
+ miR-155 expression is increased in HuT102 cells (HTLV-1+ CTCL line)
+ Cobomarsen inhibits cellular proliferation and induces apoptosis in vitro
PROLIFERATION
C O N F I D E N T I A L
33
Cobomarsen Clinical Experience in ATLL
PART F:
Open-label, dose-ranging, multiple dose trial of cobomarsen in ATLL
OVERALL TRIAL DESIGN
+ INCLUSION CRITERIA
o Acute, lymphomatous, chronic, and smouldering
subtypes
o Relapsing or in PR/CR after prior therapy
o Progressed on, or refractory to, at least one prior
therapy
+ DOSING AND DURATION
o SQ or IV
o 3 loading doses the first week
o Weekly dosing thereafter
o Discontinue if subject becomes intolerant, develops
clinically significant side effects, or progresses
OBJECTIVES
+ PRIMARY: Safety and tolerability
+ SECONDARY: PK
+ EXPLORATORY: PD, histopathology, lesion morphology
C O N F I D E N T I A L
34
Subject Characteristics and Disposition
9 Patients Enrolled 89% Black, 67% Male; Median Age of 49 Years
SUBJECT
ID
ATLL TYPE AT
DIAGNOSIS
ATLL
PRESENTATION
AT SCREENING
RELAPSE OR
PARTIAL
REMISSION
% ABNORMAL
LYMPHOCYTES
AT SCREENING
LYMPH
NODES AT
SCREENING
CT SCAN/PET
DOSE (mg)
DAYS
SINCE
LAST
TX
DURATION OF
COBOMARSEN
TX (DAYS)
DISPOSITION
101-008 Acute Acute Partial Remission 9% Normal 600 21 500 Ongoing
101-010 Lymphomatous Lymphomatous Partial Remission 14% Normal 600 46 465 Ongoing
101-012 Lymphomatous Lymphomatous Partial Remission 10% Normal 600 108 186 Ongoing
101-014 Lymphomatous Lymphomatous Partial Remission 15% Normal 600 28 136 Discontinued
119-001 Chronic Unfavorable Chronic unfavorable Partial Remission None Abnormal 600 450 274 Ongoing
101-011 Lymphomatous Lymphomatous Relapsing Not Done Abnormal 600 219 10 Discontinued
102-012/
102-015Acute
Lymphomatous
transformation,
mostly skin
Relapsing
9% Not Done 600 21 92 Discontinued
26% Normal 600 30 43 Discontinued
118-001 Smouldering Aggressive, LCT,
mostly skin
Relapsing 0.3% Abnormal 600 31 24 Discontinued
119-002 Chronic Unfavorable Acute Relapsing 45% Abnormal 900 469 18 Discontinued
(Data Cutoff March 15, 2019)
C O N F I D E N T I A L
Safety Summary of Cobomarsen in ATLL Cohort
35
+ NO DEATHS while on cobomarsen treatment
+ NO DOSE LIMITING TOXICITIES (maximum tolerated dose not yet established) and NO
DISCONTINUATION FROM TRIAL due to related AEs
+ 4 SAEs in 3 subjects DUE TO DISEASE PROGRESSION (unrelated to drug)
+ NO RELATED GRADE 3 OR GRADE 4 AEs
+ NO SIGNIFICANT HEMATOLOGICAL EVENTS
+ MOST COMMON (in more than 2 subjects) RELATED AEs (all grade 1 and 2) were DIARRHEA and
NAUSEA
Data Cutoff March 15, 2019
C O N F I D E N T I A L
36
C1D
1
C1D
5
C1D
27
C2
C4
C6
C8
C10
C12
C14
C16
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
8 0
1 0 0
% o
f C
D1
9+
B c
ell
s
M a tu re N a iv e
T ra n s itio n a l
1 1 /6 /1 7 1 2 /2 0 /1 7 2 /2 1 /1 8 4 /2 5 /1 8 7 /1 1 /1 8 1 1 /1 4 /1 8 1 /2 3 /1 9 3 /2 0 /1 9
0
2 0 0
4 0 0
6 0 0
8 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 2 0 0
0
5 0
1 0 0
1 5 0
2 0 0
2 5 0
Nu
mb
er
of
NK
or
B c
ell
s /
L Nu
mb
er o
f CD
8 c
ells
/
L
N K c e lls
C D 8 T c e lls
B c e lls
F irs t
c o b o m a rs e n
d o se
1 1 /6 /1 7 1 2 /2 0 /1 7 2 /2 1 /1 8 4 /2 5 /1 8 7 /1 1 /1 8 1 1 /1 4 /1 8 1 /2 3 /1 9 3 /2 0 /1 9
2 5
3 0
3 5
4 0
4 5
5 0
2
3
4
5
1 0
1 2
1 4
1 6
% H
ct
RB
C x
10
^6
/
L o
r Hb
g / d
LH c t
H b
R B CF irs t c o b o m a rs e n d o s e
Cobomarsen Allows For Rapid Bone Marrow Recovery Following Chemotherapy in 4 Subjects
+ Subject 101-008 received EPOCH 21 days prior to
cobomarsen treatment
+ During Cycle 1 cobomarsen treatment, immature B cells
populate the periphery as transitional B cells
+ B cells mature into naïve B cells over the next few cycles
Example – Subject 101-008
(Data Cutoff March 15, 2019)
C O N F I D E N T I A L
37
Subject 101-008 Acute ATLL in Partial Remission
+ Diagnosed Dec 2016 with acute ATLL
+ Relapsed after treatment with zidovudine, interferon ɑ-2b, lenalidomide and EPOCH chemotherapy
+ Cobomarsen monotherapy initiated Nov 2017o Stable abnormal ATL cells for
> 16 moo Normalization of residual enlarged
lymph node after chemotherapy (1.0 to 0.8 cm), which remained normal as of last imaging Nov 2018
o Reduction in biomarkers of cell activation and proliferation (Ki67, CD69 and HLA-DR)
+ Subject remains on treatment and has completed Cycle 18, missing only 1 dose due to sciatic pain
2/2
2/1
7
7/1
9/1
7
8/1
2/1
7
9/8
/17
10/1
2/1
7
11/6
/17
12/1
3/1
7
1/3
1/1
8
3/1
8/1
8
5/9
/18
7/2
5/1
8
10/1
0/1
8
12/2
6/1
8
3/2
0/1
9
0
3
6
9
1 2
1 5
1 8
2 1
2 4
2 7
3 0
3 3
Ce
lls
x 1
0^
3 /
L
L a s t E P O C H d o s e
F irs t c o b o m a rs e n d o s e
A Z T /IF NL e n a lid o m id e
E P O C H
c o b o m a rs e n
A b n o rm a l T c e lls
W B C
m is s e d
d o se
(Data Cutoff March 15, 2019)
C O N F I D E N T I A L
38
C1D
1
C1D
5
C1D
27
C2
C4
C6
C8
C10
C12
C14
C16
0 .0
0 .5
1 .0
1 .5
Fo
ld C
ha
ng
e f
ro
m B
as
eli
ne
K i-6 7
H L A -D R
C D 6 9
C1D
1
C1D
5
C1D
27
C2
C4
C6
C8
C10
C12
C14
C16
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
8 0
%C
ell
s P
os
itiv
e f
or M
ark
er
% K i-6 7 +
% H L A -D R +
% C D 6 9 +
Subject 101-008 Cobomarsen Decreases Activation and Proliferation Status of Circulating Tumor Cells in ATLL
FLOW CYTOMETRIC ASSESSMENT of ACTIVATION and PROLIFERATION
Biomarkers’ Expression in Circulating ATLL Cells
7%
Acti
va
tio
n M
ark
ers
Pro
life
rati
on
35% 25% 5% 5% 7%
CD69
C1D1
HLA-DR
C1D5 C1D27 C2D22 C6D22 C14D22
SS
C
Ki-67
SS
C
50%
1179
71%
2880
67%
214856%
1264
53%
1129
50%
1283
Percent
MFI
19%
3436
13%
21058%
1885
8%
1900
8%
2011
Percent
MFI7%
1810
C1D1 C1D5 C1D27 C2D22 C6D22 C14D22
SS
C
Percent
MFI: Median Fluorescence Intensity, ATL cells: CD3+CD4+CD8-CD25+CD127-
ATL cells: CD3+CD4+CD8-CD7-CD25+CD45RA-
% CELLS POSITIVE FOR BIOMARKERS
CHANGE FROM BASELINE IN BIOMARKERS
(Data Cutoff March 15, 2019)
C O N F I D E N T I A L
39
2 /2 8 /1 8 6 /2 0 /1 8 9 /1 7 /1 8 1 0 /4 /1 8 1 1 /1 /1 8 1 1 /2 9 /1 8 1 /1 1 /1 9 2 /1 4 /1 9 3 /1 4 /1 9
0
1
4
6
8
1 0
1 2
1 4
1 6
ce
lls
x 1
0^
3/u
L
A b n o rm a l T c e lls
W B C
F irs t
c o b o m a rs e n
d o s e
C H O E P
m is s e d
d o se
2 m is s e d
d o s e s
m is s e d
d o se
Subject 101-012 Acute ATLL in Partial Remission
+ Diagnosed Dec 2017 with ATLL,
lymphomatous sub-type
+ Received 6 cycles of CHOEP (Jan-May
2018) with complete response in nodes
but relapsing peripheral ATL cells
+ CT scan at screening was normal
+ Cobomarsen first dose Sept 2018
o Completed Cycle 6 as of cut off
date
o CT scans have remained normal
o LDH all within normal range
o Reduction in biomarkers of
activation (CD69) and
proliferation (Ki67)
(Data Cutoff March 15, 2019)
C O N F I D E N T I A L
40
Subject 101-010 Lymphomatous ATLL in Partial Remission
+ Diagnosed April 2017 with lymphomatous ATLL
+ Extensive and bulky lymphadenopathy reduced by 6 cycles of CHOEP (completed 5 months prior to initiation of cobomarsen)
+ Restaging o Resolution of adenopathy but increased splenic
uptake
o 20% of ATL cells in peripheral blood
+ Cobomarsen initiated Dec 2017o Stable lymph node size and peripheral blood
tumor cell counts maintained for 15 monthso CR obtained in viscera – CT scan Nov 2018 is
now normal (resolution of splenic lesion)o Reduction in biomarkers of cell activation and
proliferation (Ki67, CD69 and HLA-DR)o Subject has completed Cycle 16 as of cut off
date
+ Rhinovirus infection Nov 2018 and concurrent increase in neutrophil count showed evidence of a normal immune response
6/1
5/1
7
10/4
/17
12/1
1/1
7
1/3
/18
2/7
/18
3/2
1/1
8
5/9
/18
7/1
8/1
8
9/2
6/1
8
11/1
4/1
8
1/2
/19
2/2
0/1
9
0
1
2
3
6
9
1 2
1 5
Ce
lls
x 1
0^
3 /
L
F irs t
c o b o m a rs e n
d o s e
c o b o m a rs e n
A b n o rm a l T c e lls
W B C
C H O E P
In c re a s e d n e u tro p h ils in re s p o n s e to
d o c u m e n te d rh in o v iru s in fe c t io n
m is s e d d o s e s
(Data Cutoff March 15, 2019)
C O N F I D E N T I A L
41
C1D
1
C1D
5
C1D
27
C2
C4
C6
C8
C10
C12
C14
C16
0
1
2
3
Fo
ld C
ha
ng
e f
ro
m B
as
eli
ne
K i-6 7
H L A -D R
C D 6 9
M is s e d
C 4 D 1
D o s e c P A R P
C1D
1
C1D
5
C1D
27
C2
C4
C6
C8
C10
C12
C14
C16
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
%C
ell
s P
os
itiv
e f
or M
ark
er
% C D 6 9 +
% K i-6 7 +
% H L A -D R +M is s e d
C 4 D 1
D o s e
% c P A R P +
Subject 101-010 Cobomarsen Decreases Activation and Proliferation Status of Circulating Tumor Cells
SS
C
CD69
C1D1
HLA-DR
C1D5 C2D22 C4D22 C6D22S
SC
Ac
tiv
ati
on
M
ark
ers
Pro
life
rati
on
Ki-67
SS
C
33%
1539
27%
111517%
1076
16%
854
8%
814
Percent
MFI
5%
1346
1%
12522%
1375
1%
1281
2%
1498
Percent
MFI
C1D1 C1D5 C2D22 C4D22 C6D22
C12D2210%
921
1%
1526
C4D1 dose missed
C12D2216% 16% 12% 24% 14%Percent
MFI: Median Fluorescence Intensity, ATL cells: CD3+CD4+CD8-CD25+CD127-
ATL cells: CD3+CD4+CD8-CD7-CD25+CD45RA-
SS
C
Ap
op
tosis
cPARP
C1D1 C1D5 C2D22 C4D22 C6D22 C12D2218% 16% 17% 42% 12%Percent
C4D1 dose missed
11%
17%
(Data Cutoff March 15, 2019)
% CELLS POSITIVE FOR BIOMARKERS
CHANGE FROM BASELINE IN BIOMARKERS
C O N F I D E N T I A L
42
C1D
1
C1D
5
C1D
27
C2
C4
C6
C8
C10
C12
C14
C16
0 .0
0 .5
1 .0
1 .5
2 .0A c tiv a tio n M a rk e rs A T L T u m o r C e lls
Av
era
ge
Fo
ld C
ha
ng
e o
f
% C
ell
s P
os
itiv
e f
ro
m B
as
eli
ne % C D 6 9 +
% H L A -D R +
n = 4 n = 4
n = 3n = 4
n = 4
n = 3 n = 2
n = 2
n = 2 n = 2
C1D
1
C1D
5
C1D
27
C2
C4
C6
C8
C10
C12
C14
C16
0 .0
0 .5
1 .0
1 .5P ro life ra tio n In d e x A T L T u m o r C e lls
Av
era
ge
Fo
ld C
ha
ng
e o
f
% C
ell
s P
os
itiv
e f
ro
m B
as
eli
ne
% K i-6 7 +
n = 4 n = 4
n = 3
n = 4
n = 4
n = 3
n = 2n = 2
n = 2
n = 2
Cobomarsen Decreases the Activation and Proliferation of Circulating Tumor Cells
ACTIVATION MARKERS ATL TUMOR CELLS PROLIFERATION INDEX ATL TUMOR CELLS
(Data Cutoff March 15, 2019)
C O N F I D E N T I A L
Conclusions
43
+ Study continues to enroll subjects with acute and lymphomatous ATLL, relapsing and in partial or
complete remission
+ Cobomarsen treatment resulted in durable clinical stabilization of all subjects with acute,
lymphomatous and unfavorable chronic ATLL for up to 16 months (median = 9 months) after partial
remission induced by chemotherapy
+ Biomarkers of cell activation and proliferation decrease with cobomarsen treatment underscoring the
biological effect of the drug
+ Safety and tolerability profile appears benign with dose up to 600 mg – no deaths, DLTs, related SAEs,
related Grade 3 or Grade 4 AEs, hematological events or discontinuation from trial due to related AEs
+ Cobomarsen therapy allows for normal bone marrow recovery after chemotherapy-induced suppression
+ The preliminary results are encouraging and supports trial continuation to explore cobomarsen for the
treatment of ATLL subjects
C O N F I D E N T I A L
Phase I ATLL Clinical Trial of Cobomarsen
44
Investigators
Juan Carlos Ramos
University of Miami
Sylvester Comprehensive
Cancer Center
Miami, FL
Christiane Querfeld
City of Hope
Duarte, CA
Jasmine Zain
City of Hope
Duarte, CA
Noah Kornblum
Montefiore Medical Center
Bronx, NY
Alison Moskowitz
Memorial Sloan Kettering
Cancer Center
New York, NY
Adrienne A. Phillips
Weill Cornell Medicine
New York, NY
Francine M. Foss
Yale Cancer Center
New Haven, CT
Lauren Pinter-Brown
University of California
Irvine
Orange, CA
Matthew Weinstock
Beth Israel Medical Center
Boston, MA
45
SOLAR: A Phase II Clinical
Trial of Cobomarsen in
Mycosis Fungoides
Protocol Overview
C O N F I D E N T I A L
SOLAR Phase 2 Clinical Trial
46
A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-group,
Active Comparator, Global Trial in Patients
with Stage IB-III Mycosis Fungoides (MF)
Primary Endpoint
+ Overall Response Rate of Four Months (ORR4)
using Global Response Criteria
Secondary Endpoints
+ Progression-free Survival
+ Patient Reported Outcomes
OPEN LABEL RANDOMIZE TO:COBOMARSEN IV
INFUSION VS. VORINOSTAT
RANDOMIZE
COBOMARSEN (282MG IV INFUSION)
N=63 SUBJECTS
VORINOSTATN=63 SUBJECTS
FOLLOW UNTIL PROGRESSION
FOLLOW UNTIL PROGRESSION
OPEN LABEL EXTENSION
PRISM
C O N F I D E N T I A L
47
SOLAR Design as a Patient-centric Clinical Trial
47
Detailed Patient Risk Assessment
Travel Concierge
Research HomeInfusion Services
Patient Reported Outcomes
C O N F I D E N T I A L
SOLAR Study Participating Countries
48
+ Austria
+ Australia
+ Belgium
+ Canada
+ France
+ Germany
+ Italy
+ Netherlands
+ Spain
+ United Kingdom
+ United States
126 Subjects at ~60 Sites
Across 11 Countries
C O N F I D E N T I A L
SOLAR Design
49
+ PHASE 2 STUDY: comparing cobomarsen to
vorinostat
o Up to 126 subjects – 1:1 randomization
o ~60 sites in US, Canada, EU & Australia
o Duration of study – up to 36 months
+ STRATIFICATION FACTORS:
o Skin tumors (0 vs 1 or more)
o Having 0-1 vs 2 of the following prognostic
factors:
• 60 years age at diagnosis
• LDH level > ULN at diagnosis
+ DURATION OF TREATMENT: until progression
or study completion
o 28-day screening period, active treatment
period, follow-up for progression and
survival
+ INTERIM ANALYSIS FOR FUTILITY: after the
first 40 subjects followed for at least 6 months
+ LONG-TERM FOLLOW UP: every 3 months
(phone call) for survival
C O N F I D E N T I A L
Selection of the Comparator
50
+ REGULATORY REQUIREMENT TO HAVE ONLY ONE
COMPARATOR
+ BEXAROTENE OR METHOTREXATE were not selected
(limited patient population naïve to these therapies)
+ LIMITED CONTROLLED TRIALS in CTCL to gather
comparator response rates that can be utilized to calculate
sample size
+ HDAC INHIBITOR CONSIDERED A GOOD
COMPARATOR so vorinostat and romidepsin were
considered; vorinostat administration is less burdensome
on patients (oral medication vs. 4-hour in hospital IV
infusion)
+ VORINOSTAT EFFICACY IS SIMILAR TO OTHER
CANDIDATE COMPARATORS
Data from Mavoric and ALCANZA trials * Includes pcALCL and MF patients
MF PATIENTS ORR ORR4 PFS
Vorinostat 7% N/A 3.1 mos
Methotrexate 16% 7.7%* 3.5 mos
Bexarotene 16% 15.8%* 3.5 mos
C O N F I D E N T I A L
KEY EXCLUSION CRITERIA
51
+ Previous enrollment in a cobomarsen study
+ Prior therapy with HDAC inhibitors or contraindication to
vorinostat (or HDAC inhibitors)
+ Evidence of (current) large cell transformation (LCT)
+ Prior or current Sézary syndrome or mycosis fungoides with IIB
+ Extensive nodal involvement with complete or partial effacement
of LN (i.e., N3) or visceral involvement
+ Unresolved toxicities from prior therapy
+ Other medical conditions such as bleeding diathesis, prolonged
QT syndrome or previous or concurrent malignancies
+ Stages IB, IlA, IlB, III
+ Must have received at least one prior
therapy for CTCL (per NCCN guidelines
for generalized skin involvement)
+ mSWAT score ≥ 10
SPAIN At least 2 prior systemic therapies
ITALY Prior therapies, at least 1 systemic
FRANCEStage IIB or III only; 2 prior therapies,
at least 1 systemic
KEY INCLUSION CRITERIA
Protocol V3.0
C O N F I D E N T I A L
52
5 Half Lives 8 Weeks 4 Weeks Day -28
Treatment Washout Requirements (Prior to Screening)
Investigational Small
Molecule Drug
Investigational
Biologic Drug
Systemic
corticosteroid
prednisone equivalent
> 10 mg per day1
• Chronic use, more
than 20 days total
• More than 3 short
courses of 7 days
Immune therapy
• Antibody-directed
• Immunoglobulin-
based
• Other monoclonal
antibody therapies
Macrolide or tetracycline
antibiotics
Total skin electron beam
(TSEB) therapy
Phototherapy
High potency topical
corticosteroids (chronic
use, more than 20 days
total)2
Other topical MF
treatments (chronic use,
more than 20 days total)
Previous systemic MF
treatments
Screening
Begins
1 Stable regimen of systemic prednisone equivalent to ≤ 10 mg per day is permitted2 Stable doses of low to medium potency topical corticosteroids are permitted
C O N F I D E N T I A L
Concomitant Steroid and Anti-pruritic Agent Guidance
53
Patient may continue on:
Stable regimens of systemic
prednisone equivalent to ≤10mg
per day
Stable dose of medium or low
potency topical corticosteroids for
the treatment of pruritus
Stable dose of systemic anti-
pruritic agents (not used for
prophylaxis)
Topical moisturizers
Patients may not:
Start new prophylactic systemic anti-
pruritic agents
Increase corticosteroid dose for CTCL-
related symptoms
Start new chronic courses of topical or
systemic agents for pruritus or CTCL-
related symptoms
NEW SYSTEMIC TREATMENT FOR CTCL WILL BE PROHIBITED DURING THE STUDY
Patient may start new:
Short courses (≤ 7 days) of low- and
medium-potency topical corticosteroids
Short courses of systemic or high-
potency topical corticosteroids for non-
CTCL indications
Short courses (≤ 7 days) of systemic
corticosteroids for CTCL indication
allowed in exceptional cases
Short courses (≤ 7 days) of oral
antihistamines for symptomatic pruritus
Short courses of other anti-pruritic
agents for symptomatic pruritus are
allowed in exceptional cases
C O N F I D E N T I A L
Strategies For Management of Vorinostat Side Effects And Patient Retention Until Progression
54
+ miRagen PROVIDES patient and physician
guidelines on managing vorinostat side effects
+ MOST COMMON AEs are gastrointestinal
+ PRACTICAL STRATEGIES
o Take vorinostat before bed
o Remind patients to stay hydrated
o Popsicles
o Inform patients of possible side effects of
the drug
+ OPTIONS TO MANAGE side effects:
o Lowering dose to 300 mg qd
o Decreasing to 5 days per week
o Stopping medication (but continue with follow-up
until progression)
+ CAN PATIENTS WITH STABLE DISEASE OR PR/CR
that discontinue for tolerability cross to PRISM?
o No: patients can discontinue treatment, but they
NEED to remain on study UNTIL PROGRESSION
to be eligible for PRISM
55
PRISM Overview
C O N F I D E N T I A L
Open Label PRISM Study
For patients that have progressed
on the vorinostat arm in SOLAR
56
+ TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR PRISM, SOLAR patients on vorinostat must have confirmed progression
+ ADDITIONAL THERAPIES for MF should not be initiated between SOLAR and PRISM
+ INCLUSION CRITERIA: allows patients with nodal progression (N3)
+ EXCLUSION CRITERIA: patients with blood progression (B2)
+ PRISM SCREENING ASSESSMENTS will not need to be repeated if rolling directly from SOLAR
57
For the most up to date study information,
please visit
miRagen.com/clinicians