CMC in Mozambique @ CIRS 2012
15
Sara Vannini Dr. Isabella Rega Prof. dr. Lorenzo Cantoni NewMinE Lab Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
-
Upload
sara-vannini -
Category
Education
-
view
1.594 -
download
0
description
Presentation at CIRS 2012http://www.cirs2012.uevora.pt/
Transcript of CMC in Mozambique @ CIRS 2012
Sara Vannini
Dr. Isabella Rega
Prof. dr. Lorenzo Cantoni
NewMinE Lab
Università della Svizzera italiana,
Lugano, Switzerland
Community Multimedia Centres
are community-based facilities offering
both community radio broadcasting
and telecentre services.
(UNESCO, 2000)
radio telecentre
How are CMCs
by...?
• Initiating Agencies
• Staff
• Users of the CMCs
• Users of Community Radio/Non-Users
241 semi-structured interviews
361 photos
361 photos
1. SR of positive aspects of CMCs: (take a picture of something that you
of this place)
2. SR of negative aspects of CMCs: (take a picture of something that you
/that could be improved of
this place)
«L: Tem monitor tem CPU tem teclado mouse e a mesa. A: Porque você tirou isto como sendo uma foto que você gosta, o que é que ela representa? L: Porque na verdade eu vim aprender computação, e isso que é importante, tão bem conservados e estão a nos ensinar bem. Acho que é importante porque muitas pessoas vêm aqui naquelas outras instituições que dão computação não estão dessa maneira. A: Dessa maneira como? L: Não estão bonitos assim.»
Chokwe User 7 Photo 1
59.8% 30.4%
55.1% 32.7% 10.2% 84.9%
Positive Aspects
P1: Services – 33.3% P4: Users – 32.4% P2: Facilities & Tech.– 30.4% P3: People Managing – 16.7%
P1: Services – 32.7% P3: People Managing – 30.6% P4: Users – 26.5% P2: Facilities & Tech. – 20.4%
59.8% 30.4%
55.1% 32.7% 10.2%
P2: Facilities & Tech. – 39.6% P4: Users – 37.7% P1: Services – 34%
84.9%
Positive Aspects
58.1% 32.3%
46.8% 34.0% 19.1%
Negative Aspects
69.6% 30.4%
P2: Facilities & Tech.- 89.2% (F.: 74.7%, T.: 25.3%) P1: Services – 10.8%
P2: Facilities & Tech. – 85.1% (F.: 60%, T.: 40%) P1: Services - 17%
58.1% 32.3%
46.8% 34.0% 19.1%
P2: Facilities & Tech. – 93.5% (F.88.4%, T.: 11.6%)
Negative Aspects
69.6% 30.4%
1. Photo-elicitation as a promising method to investigate SR beyond “pre-packed” answers
2. Any other example of its use in SR?
