Closure Report - Home : Scottish Parliament to...Closure Report The Scottish Parliament July 2016 2...
Transcript of Closure Report - Home : Scottish Parliament to...Closure Report The Scottish Parliament July 2016 2...
1
Closure Report
The Scottish Parliament July 2016
2
Document history
Version Date Approved Summary of Changes
1.0 02/06/16 Michelle Hegarty Approved by DPP Board with suggested
amendments agreed to be actioned
2.0 24/06/16 Michelle Hegarty Benefits summary updated to reflect
risks/assumptions and dependencies
identified in business case regarding impact
of an Election within the lifetime of the
programme and a change in Members
Updated and ensured consistency between
summary graphics and benefits reporting
Benefits realisation intro updated
Amended Q & M section benefits
NPV description added
Amended ownership of residual risks and
issues
Contents
1. Executive Summary
2. Digital Parliament Strategy
3. Approach
4. Benefits Realisation
5. Challenges
6. Follow on actions & lessons learned
7. Residual Risks and Issues
8. Programme Finance & NPV
Annexes
A – Finance tables B - Project Details and Follow on Actions C – Benefits Realisation D – Lessons Learned
Links
Strategy & Vision 2013 Business case 2013 Business case 2014
3
1. Executive Summary
Note of Thanks
1.1. The Digital Parliament Programme (DPP) has been an organisation wide change
effort. It has touched the entire Scottish Parliamentary Service (SPS) as well as
Members and their staff and would not have been possible without the commitment
of everyone involved. The Programme Senior Responsible Owner (SRO) and Board
would like to thank all the specialist technical and business area staff involved in the
various projects for their commitment and effort, Leadership Group (LG) and Office
Heads for leading and embedding the changes and all of the SPS who have
successfully adapted to new ways of working.
Vision
1.2. The DPP programme’s vision was that:
By 2016 you will be able to consume our services digitally, enabling you to connect, communicate and collaborate successfully with others.
1.3. The initial strategy was agreed by LG in June 2013. Subsequently a programme
business case was agreed in December 2013 and, following the appointment of a
new SRO, updated in December 2014.
Outcomes
1.4. The key outcomes for the programme were:
Members can create, use/ re-use, share and collaborate on information as
parliamentarians and employers
The SPS can create, produce, use/re-use, publish, collaborate and dispose of
information efficiently and effectively to meet compliance requirements and
support digital working
We provide the public with open, accessible information and enable
participation through multiple online channels
Members and SPS understand the benefits of digital working and have the
capability to get the best out of the digital working environment.
4
Programme Achievements
5
Programme Finance
1.5. The programme Net Present Value (NPV) is forecast to be £2.588m against the
December 2014 business case estimate of £0.646m. An annual budget saving of
£653k is forecast along with an annual staff efficiency of £242k. Total programme
spend was £2.761m against a budget of £3.18m.
Looking Forward
1.6. The current programme has seen a step change in processes and capability in the
organisation with significant progress across all of the planned outcome areas. We
have laid a solid foundation from which to build our digital ambitions as the
Parliament heads into its fifth session.
1.7. In December 2015 LG agreed to refresh the digital strategy as a key strategic priority.
It was also agreed that we would mature our approach by developing a single Digital
and Business IT strategy with a new governance mechanism to prioritise spend
decisions in line with our digital ambitions.
1.8. A strategic decision was taken as part of the 2014 planning effort to focus
predominantly on services, products and support to Members. As such the majority
of effort was on Member facing digital delivery and benefits realisation. LG has
recognised this is a continuing priority for session 5.
6
2. Digital Parliament Strategy
2.1. In June 2013 LG agreed to develop a Digital Parliament Programme as a result of
analysis on how evolving digital technologies, societal trends on consuming, sharing
and using information, and new ways of working could benefit Members and the
public and enhance how SPS delivers its services and products. Analysis of driving
forces and business insights at the time showed that there were significant strategic
benefits in pursuing a digital strategy. LG approved a business case for the
programme in December 2013.
2.2. The rationale for a new Digital Parliament Programme, taken from the business case,
stated:
Digital is changing business as usual for most, if not all, organisations and the pace of change is rapid. The Digital Parliament Programme presents a timely opportunity to inject pace into the adoption of digital working practices to change and transform our approach to many areas of our core business – how we manage records and other documents, how our datasets are captured and linked, how we create and publish business documents and how key information is accessed and used by Members. As well as keeping pace with expectations of Members, our staff, partner organisations and the general public there are strategic drivers for public services to adopt a digital first approach to service design.
7
3. Approach
3.1. The programme employed an iterative, rolling wave approach to planning
with projects being scoped for inclusion at key points (December 2013, May
2014 and April 2015), consistent with the agile approach recommended by
the Government Digital Service and being adopted widely across the public
sector, to better manage digital resources in a fast changing environment. At
each point the programme board considered a range of options for inclusion
in the programme to best meet the outcomes and deliver the benefits,
bearing in mind available resources.
3.2. Throughout, Members’ feedback informed the priorities for delivery across
waves 1, 2 and 3. A full description of each of the projects and what they
have delivered is attached at Annex B.
3.3. After the approval of the strategy and business case by LG all subsequent
decisions on achieving the agreed outcomes were delegated to the SRO for
the programme. Both LG and the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body
(SPCB) were kept updated via the Operational Performance Framework. Key
decisions, requiring a change to practices and/or policies in relation to
Members were approved by SPCB. Following a change of SRO in 2014
there was a refresh of governance, resources and planning approach,
including the development of a programme office. The organisational
structure as shown below was developed and adopted:
8
Leadership Group(Sponsoring Group)
Michelle HegartySRO
Susan Duffy
Alan BalharrieLead Supplier
David McGill
Emma MacDonald Change Manager
Programme Board
Colin Chisholm
Vicky MoyesLearning &
Development Advisor
Programme Office
William HeighProgramme Manager
Edward Wood (external)
Projects
BIT Sub Programme
Programme Assurance
- Internal Audit
Responsible for Benefits Realisation
Louise ScottProgramme Admin
3.4. Roles and responsibilities were refreshed as per the updated business case.
A BIT sub-programme team was introduced in 2014 to ensure BIT’s technical
resources were managed effectively and that the Head of BIT could give
advice and assurance to the SRO on technical delivery. Edward Wood,
Director of Strategy and Implementation, from Westminster joined the board
to provide an external perspective on the programme.
3.5. The SRO instigated a number of audits, carried out by internal audit function,
to examine governance and controls in the programme and to ensure these
were being applied effectively. Both audits were passed with only minor
corrective action and the reports were accepted by the AAB in April and
December 2015.
9
4. BENEFITS REALISATION
Benefits strategy
4.1. The change and benefits management strategy was based on approaches,
tools and techniques that recognised the importance of involving business
change managers and other stakeholders in the management and ownership
of benefits and business change. LG endorsed the approach and the benefits
strategy (LG (2013) Paper 070). The programme benefits map and a
summary of the approach and outcomes, benefits and measurements can be
found at Annex C.
4.2. As with any change programme, ownership, support and role modelling by
senior management was essential. The Digital Parliament Board has noted
the considerable contribution made throughout the programme from LG in
ensuring we successfully delivered our vision, outcomes and benefits for
Members, SPS and the public under this strategic priority for change.
4.3. Under the benefits realisation for the programme the following were
delivered:
A programme level benefits realisation plan which included
measurements
A programme level change plan
Individual project benefit and change plans
Benefits reporting to DPP Board, June 2015, October 2015 and
January 2016
A readiness and acceptance review: project handover to business
operations that includes business owners for new services and
products being agreed and benefit reporting post programme
4.4. As stated in the business case the principal benefits arising from the
programme outcomes are non-economic. Significant efficiency and/or cost
savings benefits, where these could be reasonably demonstrated, have been
captured (see section 8 Programme Finance).
4.5. The programme diagram below shows the projects that have contributed to
achieving the programme outcomes and benefits as an interrelated set:
Projects, Outcomes and Benefits
10
Increased choice for Members in ways to access our services
ProjectsBenefits
Benefits
Members can create, use/ re-use, share and collaborate on
information as parliamentarians and employers
The Scottish Parliamentary Service can create, produce, use/re-use, publish, collaborate and dispose of information efficiently
and effectively to meet compliance requirements and
support digital working
We provide the public with open, accessible information and
enable participation through multiple online channels
Members and Scottish Parliamentary Service officials
understand the benefits of digital working and have the
capability to get the best out of the digital working environment
Improved customer experience for Members
Improved process efficiencies
Easier access to information
Improved digital literacy for Members and Scottish Parliamentary Service
Meet information compliance requirements
Increased capability for continuous improvement
Outcomes
MSP Portal 1, 2 and Session 5
MAQA Mobile
Business Products
Digital Meeting Packs
Business Publications
Data Architecture
Document and Records Management
Open Data
Online Strategy
Digital Meeting Facilities
Paper Smart
Digital Capability
11
Benefits realisation
4.6. In this section we explain how we achieved each outcome in the programme
through the many capabilities and deliverables from the projects, which in
turn contributed to benefits realisation.
4.7. The December 2014 business case noted that the preparation work for the
new session towards the end of the programme and the outcomes of the
Smith Commission could impact both SPS resource availability and
sustainability of any changes already in progress.
4.8. As expected when reporting the latest benefit figures it became apparent that
the reduction in parliamentary business around the election, as well a
member turnover of 40%, has impacted benefits realisation in some areas.
Where appropriate the benefits realisation reports include information up to
the end of the parliamentary session (March 2016) and the end of the
programme (May 2016). Where this has occurred we have explained
mitigating actions and support that has been put in place to sustain changes.
12
Outcome 1 – Members
Increased choice for Members in ways to access our services
Outcome 1
Members can create, use/ re-use, share and collaborate on
information as parliamentarians and employers
Improved customer experience for Members
Improved process efficiencies
Easier access to information
Feedback from Members has been consistently
positive, largely focusing on the single point of
access to information and the time efficiency it
introduces.
Access to business and employer information
available on mobile devices anytime, anywhere
Mobile lodging of Questions and Motions, via MSP Portal. Statistics for session 5 show 91% of submission
to chamber desk using self service, up from 70% in Session 4
Print & Publication and Meeting Pack projects produced savings of £607k and efficiency of £17k per annum
By March 2016, 90% of Members had accessed
and 75% were regularly accessing and using
relevant information via the MSP Portal
Meeting Packs for Members are now uploaded to
the MSP Portal for Committee, SPCB, Conveners
Group, Parliamentary Bureau and CPA Branch
meetings.
Access to Parliamentary business information and
employer information via MSP Portal
Enhanced Business Bulletin on MSP Portal and
Website
MSP Portal
4.9. By March 2016, 90% of Members had accessed, and 75% were regularly
accessing and using, relevant information via the MSP Portal, a mobile,
single, personalised, digital point of access to parliamentary information. In
session 5 over 76% of Members have accessed the portal so far. The MSP
Portal is now our primary channel for delivering information to Members,
supporting our underlying principle of an anywhere, anytime digital working
environment.
13
4.10. Services available on the MSP Portal at this time include:
An improved, digital-friendly and interactive Business Bulletin
Committee and Plenary Official Reports
Meeting packs for Committees, SPCB, Convenors’ Group and CPA
Key guidance (e.g. Code of Conduct, Security)
SPICe Briefings
Motions and Questions (lodge/review/support)
Members’ expense reports
Members’ cost provision reports
Stationery and postage provision reports
HR guidance
Election and induction guidance
Security guidance
Members’ Continuous Professional Development
Noticeboard e.g. office notices, recess and other announcements
4.11. Feedback from Members on the MSP Portal has been excellent, largely
focusing on the single point of access to information and the time efficiency it
introduces. Feedback throughout the programme has been ongoing through
the BIT engagement service and Members’ feedback exercises. Detailed
analysis of the three Members’ surveys can be found here link.
Motions and Questions service 4.12. A key service delivered on the MSP Portal is the Questions and Motions
Service (Q & M). The service provides the functions to submit motions,
support, questions, amendments and names for the weekly oral questions
draw at any time to the Chamber Desk, without having to use email. Benefits
to Members’ include:
ability to keep track of submitted items, including when answers to
questions are due
provides messaging that informs Members’ of oral question deadlines and
confirms that submissions to the Chamber Desk have been sent
successfully
allows for multiple motion support with support going live immediately (it
also allows the user to retract support on the same day it was added)
allows items go directly into the Chamber Desk processing system
14
4.13. At the start of session 5 the overall figure shows that 90.59% of all
submissions to the Chamber Desk for the period came via the Q&M service,
compared with an average of around 70% last session. New Members are
using the system much more than their predecessors.
4.14. Previously motion support via email was a resource-intensive process for
the Chamber Desk. Now over 95% of support comes via Q&M, which frees
up capacity for Chamber Desk staff. The decision to drop the email link from
emails seeking support from other Members has contributed to this positive
shift in using the service.
4.15. Motions and written questions, the bulk of transactions, also shows an
increase (52% to 68% and 61%-67% respectively). Oral questions are up on
average around 2%.
Digital Meeting Packs
4.16. From April 2014 meeting packs for committee and other meetings began to
be distributed as bookmarked PDFs. This change provided a format that
could be easily accessed, shared and annotated on mobile devices.
4.17. In August 2015, the DPP commissioned a second project aimed at building a
consistent approach to the presentation, functionality, production, distribution
and use of digital meeting packs. Meeting packs for Members are now
uploaded to the MSP Portal for committee, SPCB, Conveners’ Group,
Parliamentary Bureau and CPA Branch meetings.
GOING FORWARD
Further iterations and development of the MSP Portal in response to Members’ needs, usage and feedback will continue in our Digital Strategy going forward. This will include setting out a responsive roadmap for future enhancements and services based on technical advances and Members’ feedback.
15
Business Products
4.18. By March 2015 an overall strategy and roadmap was developed for digitising
our business publications to meet the needs of Members and increase
efficiencies in creation and production processes.
4.19. The key outcomes were linkage and re-use of data; greater use of
visualisations and graphical representations of information rather than text;
and new approaches to constructing information. The key principle is that we
now create data driven products, replacing plain text with data, which is
stored for re-use and re-purposing. The data is now structured and can be
consumed in different formats over many channels – the data does not
change but the formats can. Data is also linked and therefore much easier to
find.
4.20. At the end of session 4 the new Business Bulletin was delivered to gather
user feedback. In addition efficiencies in the creation and production
processes have been introduced. From the start of session 5 the new
Business Bulletin has been available on the MSP Portal and the Parliament’s
website.
4.21. The new digital Bulletin contains the “Business Calendar” which provides
direct access to Today’s and Future Business of the Parliament. Other
features include the ability to share information contained within the Bulletin
via email and direct to social media, and to filter motions and questions by
type, party or group.
4.22. A pilot has been completed to enable SPICe research briefings and
committee reports to be produced in a similar format. A new authoring tool to
enable committee reports and SPICe briefings to be created and published
by SPS is due to be implemented by October and is included in our future
digital strategy.
Business Publications & Print Strategy
4.23. Throughout the programme we have deflated the demand for printed
documents by Members and SPS, aligned with an increased digital offering
and a move towards self-print as required. In June 2015 the programme
reported a reduction of 77% in SPS and 21% in Members’ subscriptions to
official printed publications. (This equates to a 40% reduction for building
16
users overall.) The Parliament had by this point achieved cash savings of
£255k per annum and we remain on course for an annual saving of £586k by
its conclusion.
4.24. In April 2015 the SPCB approved a shift away from printing and delivery of
business publications, given the investment made in making them available
more quickly and with improved functionality via the MSP Portal. This was
successfully implemented and Members responded positively to this change
with early individual queries from individuals being explained quickly and
thoroughly by frontline staff.
4.25. By July 2015 delivery of printed business publications ceased and a self-print
service for Members and SPS was introduced. Only Bill documents,
including marshalled lists and groupings, will continue to be printed in hard
copy for Members by an external contractor.
4.26. In March 2016 the SPCB agreed a Business Information Policy to provide
business publications to Members electronically via the MSP Portal and for
the policy to be extended in session 5 to include all meeting packs. Members
and/or their delegated staff can still access print as required.
GOING FORWARD Work will continue under the future digital strategy for technical options to enable better access to business information for delegated Members’ staff and ease of printing, where this is necessary or preferred.
17
Outcome 2 – Information
Outcome 2
The Scottish Parliamentary Service can create, produce, use/re-use,
publish, collaborate and dispose of information efficiently and
effectively to meet compliance requirements and support digital
working
Improved process efficiencies
Easier access to information
Meet information compliance requirements
£150k per annum efficiency saving on SPShare
search and records management activities
£65k per annum efficiency savings on future
development and maintenance expected from
now as a result of having common data model
and integrated data across systems
80 elements of data, connected via the common
data model in procedural systems (EditOR, CAS,
Votes, ROI, MAQA) as well as SPShare and
MSP Portal.
By February 2016 the SPS had established an
organisation-wide collaborative information
environment for managing our documents and
recordsvia SPShare
Improved data architecture and technical
capability for data search, visualisation and
reporting
We now have the capability to create, use,
share, declare, transfer and dispose of
documents and records in line with compliance
requirements via SPShare
Data Architecture
4.27. The Data Architecture project has been a significant investment in improving
our core parliamentary data and to ensure it is standardised and securely
managed. This has been a key foundation for the current programme and
future digital development because all digital delivery relies on good quality
data that can be used flexibly. We have agreed data standards, database
standards and a common data model database. This is akin to having all our
parliamentary business data in one warehouse where it is well managed and
secure and can be re-used across all our different systems with confidence.
4.28. This is a significant step forward in providing our underlying foundations for
digital working. As a result we can now reuse consistent, robust data across
parliamentary business applications (EditOR, MAQA, CAS, Votes Agenda
Management (new), Register of Interests(new), MSP Portal, SPShare and a
number of ancillary systems e.g. the MSP new start form. This higher degree
of integration results in increased effectiveness and efficiency, particularly for
SPICe, Chamber Office and Committees. The information produced by
these applications can now be easily extracted, transformed, loaded and
thereafter consumed to offer improved search, reporting, and open data
capabilities.
18
4.29. We have also as a result of this investment directly supported the development of the following new digital services:
MSP Portal
Business Bulletin
Mobile Questions and Motions service
Improved searching, querying and reporting of procedural data
Improved data visualisation, analytic and trending models
Providing, searching and reporting of open data
Document and Records Management
4.30. By February 2016 the SPS had established an organisation-wide
collaborative information environment for managing our documents and
records. The technical platform (SPShare) supports team sites and
centralised corporate business activities. As the SharePoint environment
was in place already, this was a cost effective use of an existing investment.
4.31. SPShare has improved the organisation’s capability for creating, searching,
sharing, storing, collaborating on and disposing of documents in the digital
working environment. We also now have the capability to manage our
documents and records in line with compliance requirements under the
Public Records (Scotland) Act 2011. This has resulted in an efficiency saving
of £150k per annum.
4.32. The scale of change to routine working practices, and the challenges already
experienced by the organisation around embedding good records and
information management, made it vital to thoroughly plan and actively
manage the roll out. This was a significant change effort across the
organisation requiring 24 team sites and 20 shared business activity areas to
be developed which, together with personal MySites, moved the majority of
content from old network (G and H) drives onto SPShare.
4.33. Considerable planning, engagement and organisation wide communications
in the early stages, together with the pioneer and gateway review approach,
ensured continued senior management support and a successful delivery
within the cost and time tolerances from the business case.
19
4.34. A formal post implementation survey showed a largely positive response
even though the change is still being embedded across SPS.
Outcome 3 – Participation
Outcome 3
We provide the public with open, accessible information and enable
participation through multiple online channels
Easier access to information
Increased capability for continuous improvement
Dedicated open data site data.parliament.scot.
A total of 75 datasets now available for re-use.
By March 2015 the programme had delivered
an overarching strategy and solutions for all of
our online channels
Growth in local digital initiatives e.g. SPICe budget tool, committee engagement strategy, website
map data and EditOR picks blog
Open Data
4.35. Improving our management of core parliamentary data has provided the
technical foundations to re-use, search and report on data and to respond to
data requirements from Members, SPS and external users. It has provided a
strong foundation for opening our data up for others to use in novel and
innovative ways. This also contributes to the Strategic Plan ambitions for
transparency and openness and to wider societal expectations in terms of
the transparency and re-use of public sector data that is being driven at a UK
and European policy level.
GOING FORWARD While the successful move onto SPShare delivered the core benefits of an effective document and records management system, there remains some follow on recommendations to reinforce the longer-term benefits expected from the business case. This will now be undertaken in the digital strategy going forward.
20
4.36. In May 2014 a selection of initial open data sets was made available via the
Parliament’s web site for download. The web page provided users with the
functionality to provide feedback, which was then used to identify the
priorities for future releases.
4.37. In June 2015 the programme launched the dedicated open data site
data.parliament.scot. A total of 75 datasets are now available from this
service. A range of positive feedback has been received from stakeholders
ranging from technical developers, academia and
TheyWorkForYou/Scotland.
4.38. Furthermore there has been some initial feedback from external users
wishing to use the datasets as building blocks to create products, for
example a legislation tracker. This is also in line with the case made to
SPCB, namely that by opening up our data others would create useful by-
products that we may not have the resource or capability to develop.
Online Strategy
4.39. Our strategic ambition was to address the wide range of online platforms
required by the organisation to carry out its business. In summary these are
the MSP Portal, the website, a parliamentary archive, social media platforms
and a social collaborative staff internet. Recognising that we did not have the
technical understanding and skills to do so in house the programme
commissioned a specific project to procure specialist advice and the
development of a comprehensive online strategy which could then form the
basis for a delivery plan.
4.40. By March 2015 the programme had delivered an overarching strategy and
solutions for all of our online channels, aligning them with the needs of our
stakeholders and the objectives and aims of the Strategic Plan and the
Public Engagement Strategy.
GOING FORWARD There are a number of important datasets that we intend to release that are a fundamental part of parliamentary business, namely Votes, the Official Report and the Register of Interests. These are now intended to be released by the end of summer 2016. There is ongoing engagement with the open data community and users of the site which will inform future development.
21
4.41. Given the scale of the resultant online strategy, The Digital Parliament Board
decided in April 2015 to commission a report on how we could deliver the
strategy. Based on this work the SRO took a decision that the project could
not be progressed within the lifetime of the current programme because of
the scale of change, the resource requirements and the likely negative
impact on the remaining programme deliverables.
Outcome 4 – Capability
Outcome 4
Members and Scottish Parliamentary Service officials understand the
benefits of digital working and have the capability to get the best out of
the digital working environment
Improved digital literacy for Members and Scottish Parliamentary Service officials
Increased capability for continuous improvement
The programme has ensured that across all
projects training and support has been planned
and delivered in alignment with the
Organisational Development Programme
SPLearning hosts a new Digital Literacy
framework
Members positive response to feeling supported
to work digitally
All new members introduced to digital initiatives.
In session 4 we used 49% less paper than in
session 2 (against a 35% target). A £46k per
annum budget saving was achieved using multi
function devices. Improved process efficiencies
6 new digital meeting rooms. Excellent feedback
and increasing use of digital facilities
Growth in local digital initiatives e.g. EH99 , updated Corporate Bulletin and PIP tracker, Security advice
website and form development
Meeting packs project forecast to achieve 60%
of 2016/17 paper reduction target
GOING FORWARD Implementation of the Online Strategy is now included in the digital strategy LG are being invited to consider and endorse in July 2016.
22
Members
4.42. Early engagement with Members took place in 2013 to inform the Digital
Parliament Strategy. The Digital Parliament Board recognised that
engagement with Members was essential for future planning and
commissioned three engagement exercises over the lifetime of the
programme. This complemented the BIT engagement service’s well-
established and successful engagement with Members.
4.43. By 2015 Members reported they were aware of the shift towards new ways of
working digitally. This shift was undoubtedly supported by the BIT led
increase in the range of mobile devices available to Members and the early
(2011) availability of basic services (email, etc.) to mobile devices for early
adopters in the MSP community. Some Members felt very confident about
their knowledge of latest developments, and indeed identified themselves as
being in the vanguard. Around 20% of Members reported they were ‘very
aware’ of developments.
4.44. All Members said they did some of their work digitally. A significant number
reported an increase in the quantity and range of digital working practices or
said that almost all their work was being done digitally, while for the rest it
was either most of their work, or a balance between digital and paper based.
A small minority of Members said they generally preferred paper.
4.45. The overwhelming majority of Members reported that there was ‘good to
excellent’ support for working digitally. The largest group reported generally
positive comments (e.g. ‘can’t fault the service, ‘never an issue not dealt
with’), while another slightly smaller group was effusive in their feedback
(being ‘very impressed’, ‘very happy’, feeling ‘hugely supported’ and feeling
the service is ‘brilliant’).
4.46. The Digital Programme Board recognises that this positive feedback was due
to a co-ordinated and collaborative effort across business areas. Business
areas delivered support to Members regarding specific services e.g. Motions
and Questions and Digital Meeting Facilities. The BIT Engagement Service
(via the Engagement desk and the one-to-one support provided by the BIT
Engagement Manager) was also instrumental in supporting Members and
23
SPS staff as well as sharing best practice with the Digital Parliament
Programme Office.
4.47. The final Members’ engagement exercise was carried out from December to
January 2016. Access to Members was impacted by the heavy parliamentary
schedule and preparation for the end of the session. Overall the shift to
digital working was still on a positive track. A recurring theme of the feedback
was on the constrained ability to use devices in committees and the
chamber. This was recognised in the programme’s Risk Register and
mitigating actions were identified and taken forward by the Board and LG.
4.48. At the start of session 5 the new PO changed his guidance on conduct in the
chamber to allow the use of mobile devices. The change opens the way for
Members to work digitally in the chamber, to access information online during
debates, and even engage in social media discussions on parliamentary
issues. As a result the services and products provided through the
programme can be accessed everywhere.
4.49. The Programme Board recognised the importance of the 2016 Election
Programme, particularly the induction of Members, in ensuring that the new
ways of working were introduced and adopted. Engagement with the Election
Planning Project on sustaining the changes for Members was carried out
from the end of 2015. Continuing efforts will concentrate on continually
supporting Members and ensuring the changes delivered under the
programme are embedded.
Organisational learning
4.50. The Programme has ensured that across all projects support and training
has been planned and delivered in alignment with the Organisational
Development Programme, led by Human Resources. This involved a
blended approach to support and training to increase our digital capability.
4.51. The skills, competency and confidence in IT and digital literacy required to
carry out our roles requires ongoing investment. It is recommended that this
continues to be addressed in the future digital strategy. Enablers have
already been put in place under the OD Programme:
24
A new online learning platform, SPLearning, was launched in
September 2015. This has info-pods for SPShare induction and
training and Digital Meeting Facilities training. It also supports online
communities for digital literacy e.g. the IPad user community
A Digital Literacy Framework continues to be developed and rolled out
across business areas.
Paper Smart
4.52. In support of the deflation of paper by October 2014 the installation of
Safecom secure printing, originally introduced in 2011, was completed in full
on all MFDs at Holyrood. This added flexibility and efficiency to how staff
print, scan and copy. It also facilitated the acceleration of the rationalisation
of office printers which was completed by the end of October 2014.
4.53. In addition the Parliament is out-performing the paper reduction target
approved by the SPCB as part of its environmental strategy. As of December
2015 paper use was down 65% compared to session 2 (against a 35%
target). As less paper is being used, there is a cost saving from disposing of
it of approximately £8000 a year. By the end of session 4 this had decreased
to 49% less paper though this has been attributed to the run up to the
election. On-going monitoring of reduction in paper use is being taken
forward under the by the Environmental Steering Group.
Digital Meeting Rooms
4.54. To support our digital working environment we have addressed the physical
constraints and have updated technology in our meeting room facilities. A
standard suite of technology has now been installed in TG.26, TG.27, TG.28,
TG.24, TG.20/21 and Q1.03 with large touchscreens also being included in
Q1.03 and TG.20/21. The suite of technology deployed, built on and
enhanced the previous audio visual equipment used in the rooms. Changes
were also made to furniture, acoustics and lighting. The support
arrangement and ongoing collaboration between the FM and BIT offices
which was introduced at the beginning of the project has proved effective and
will continue.
25
4.55. The definition of a “digital meeting” is when the meeting requires technology
to be available for the room users. Over the reporting period this equates to
26% of the total meetings in the rooms where the technology has been
installed. However, an increasing trend is evident with 31% of meetings in
2016 being recorded as “digital”.
4.56. A survey and feedback through CRM engagement also provided evidence on
increased use of the facilities and positive response regarding the use of the
technology in the rooms:
Documents accessible in real time
More engaging, easier to visualise discussion
Facilities are great for Committee enquiry work, talking to witnesses
etc.
More productive – get more done in available time, no need to print,
less likely to go back written notes and more likely to take forward
actions agreed and noted directly in documents
4.57. The Programme Board noted the benefits in the increased utilisation of the
smaller rooms. Evidence suggests that these are being used as meeting
spaces for small groups and “one-to-ones”. They are also being used as
break-out work spaces for individuals whereas the larger rooms are used for
training and higher profile meetings.
26
Wider digital development instigated by business areas
4.58. The Digital Parliament Board acknowledges the work undertaken out with the
programme, which has supported and aligned with our digital aims and
outcomes. The following are examples delivered across business areas
during the lifetime of the programme:
Contactless payment system introduced by Facilities Management
and Apprentices
SPLearning platform via the Organisational Development Programme
Working for MSPs platform introduced via the Organisational
Development Programme
New digital security clearance process introduced by Security Office
First SPICe digital briefing for Members on the Commonwealth
Continuous improvement of products for digital consumption: EditOR’s
pick, SPICe Briefings and use of data visualisation and video,
Corporate Bulletin, EH99, security advice for members and their staff
Innovation fund bids such as the Budget Tool and the Web and Social
Media Team’s data mapping functionality on the website
Public Information and Publications introduction of Live Chat facility on
the website
Managing Dis-benefits
4.59. The Board accepted that there would be dis-benefits during the lifetime of the
programme. The programme has addressed these where possible through
mitigating actions at a project level and through programme risk
management activities.
4.60. By focusing on improving services for Members, The Board acknowledged
that there would at times be the requirement for dual running of services
potentially impacting capacity and resources in business areas. It was
accepted that we were not re-engineering all of the production processes as
part of the programme’s scope.
4.61. Through continual engagement and support, instances of these were
managed collaboratively between the programme office, BIT Engagement
services, individual projects and business areas. We have focused on
encouraging the majority of Members to use the new digital services and
reduced the need for dual running of services.
27
4.62. Projects and business areas have worked together to produce guidance, key
messages and business continuity plans. One example of this collaborative
working was the guidance issued to business areas following the SPCB
decision on ceasing delivery and printing of business information. This is a
significant change being managed pragmatically by clerking with senior
management support.
4.63. The prioritisation of resources to system development within the programme
had an opportunity cost for those systems, out with the programme, such as
CAS and EditOR. This impact was acknowledged by LG and by combining
both IT and Digital strategies for session 5 it is hoped a balanced portfolio for
development of both existing and new systems can be achieved.
Benefits realisation beyond the programme
4.64. As established in the business case approved by LG benefits realisation
reporting reflects a point in time and further analysis and reporting will be
required. As a requirement of the handover from project to business
operations, benefit owners have been identified to measure and report
benefits realisation following programme closure. Not only will this contribute
to the final benefits appraisal but also inform products’ and services’
continuous improvement. A post implementation review of the programme
along with the final appraisal of benefits is planned for spring 2017.
4.65. Building our digital capability is about more than the technical skills to use
software and hardware. The way we think, behave, work and communicate
both internally and externally needs to evolve to respond to the drivers for
change and to meet our strategic and digital aims.
4.66. The Digital Programme Board and LG recognise that to build on our digital
capability, and to bring about the necessary changes, takes time. The Digital
Parliament Programme has injected pace and laid the foundations for
change within our organisation, building capacity and infrastructure for the
digital journey that will continue beyond the lifetime of the programme and
enabling opportunities for further business transformation to be embraced.
4.67. At its conclusion in May 2016, the programme has put in place a solid
foundation for the organisation to continue to modernise in the future,
anticipating and responding to the changing demands of Members, public
and staff.
28
5. Challenges and lessons learned
5.1. Throughout the programme a number of challenges presented themselves
and we have highlighted the key areas below. In addition the programme
team along with project SROs and the programme board were asked to
consider what elements of the programme had gone well and where there
were opportunities for doing things better in future. The full lessons learned
report is at Annex D.
5.2. We note that these are common challenges faced by organisations
implementing digital strategies.
Agile/Iterative Development
5.3. The rolling wave approach to planning and iterative project progression was
a success for the programme. However it was the first time the Parliament
had attempted this on such a scale and it did present a number of
challenges. Each project was generally cutting new ground for the SPS and
had to find solutions for delivery as part of its work Not having a definite
picture of what completion would look like caused issues, especially at the
start of the programme in terms of engagement with SPS in understanding
the outcomes.
5.4. The programme took steps to address this challenge by making information
available on its engagement site and holding a number of digital events
where progress on projects was showcased and where external speakers
illustrated the nature of digital change in their sectors. LG and other senior
stakeholders were engaged to ensure the programmes key messages were
disseminated. The challenge of describing the end state eased once early
projects began to deliver and stakeholders could start to see the direction of
travel and benefits being accrued.
5.5. Iterative planning also caused a challenge in terms of budgeting where the
programme was operating in a responsive manner which could not be easily
aligned with the annual budgeting cycle. The delegation given to the SRO to
operate within a given budget allowed the board to prioritise but there were
challenges where projects spanned financial years.
29
5.6. Another aspect of the iterative approach was managing dependencies,
especially at a technical level. An example of this was the Data Architecture
project. This had a logical design completed early but the technologies to be
utilised and dependencies with other technical developments, were not
known until after the project was well underway. This is a challenge that is
likely to remain for future digital developments.
Online Channels
5.7. Whilst the MSP Portal has been developed and proven a success, progress
on other channels was limited due to the agreement not to start delivery of
the online strategy within the lifetime of the programme. The reason for this
that once the online strategy had been developed it became apparent that
the work entailed to deliver was a major undertaking in its own right and
significant budget and resourcing decisions would have to be taken in order
to progress. Although some budget had been allocated in FY 15/16 this was
insufficient to make any significant progress. The tight project budgeting for
16/17 made it clear that a longer term view would be required. At the initial
LG planning day which looked at the digital strategy for session 5 it was clear
that development of our online channels is seen as a priority.
Resourcing
5.8. Resourcing was a constant challenge within the programme. This was
around two key areas. Firstly BIT had the challenge of carrying out significant
work within the programme alongside other budgeted and planned projects
and day to day operations. This required a different approach to resourcing
within BIT and the formation of a BIT sub-programme to oversee the
technical and resource challenges. Through flexible use of contract staff and
ongoing re-prioritisation this approach was effective; however feedback from
BIT has highlighted the opportunity cost to the development of systems out
with the programme. LG have agreed that going forward we have a
combined Digital and IT strategy, enabling a more holistic approach to
prioritisation.
5.9. Outwith BIT it was challenging to identify appropriate resources for PM and
SRO positions with sufficient experience. Whilst SROs and PMs did an
30
excellent job, the lack of experience, training and support at an
organisational level has been highlighted. This has been identified as an
issue for the new Project and Programme Office to address.
6. Follow on actions
6.1. With any major change programme it is fundamental to ensure that the
change is sustained after the programme ceases and that service functions
are prepared to support the changed environment. The programme
developed a handover process to achieve this. At a programme level there
are three key follow on actions that will flow through to the next iteration of
the digital strategy.
The Business Products project produced a revised Business Bulletin for
consumption on both the MSP Portal and the Parliament’s web site. They
have also trialled a new tool for the production of Committee reports and
SPICe Briefings. Once approved this will be a key factor for achieving the
remainder of the print savings.
Data Architecture has seen a significant change in the way Parliamentary
data and systems are connected. This work has been challenging and
more complex than was originally thought. By the end of June 2016 the
remaining 3 parliamentary systems are due to have been completed;
however there remain a number of less significant but related systems
that require to be adjusted and the publication of the agreed open data
sets. BIT has agreed to carry on this work as part of their project portfolio.
A post implementation review of the programme along with the final
appraisal of benefits is planned for spring 2017.
6.2. The follow on actions for each project are included in the table at Annex B.
31
7. Residual Risks and Issues
7.1. Outstanding risks and where ownership now lies.
Risk Owner Action
Embedding the change – across all projects and client groups, specifically regarding Members and meeting packs/ information policy. Requires continued leadership support
Michelle Hegarty supported by LG
Session 5 Digital Strategy
Risk that there may be insufficient technical capability to support the changes introduced through the programme
Alan Balharrie
To be considered as part of BIT resourcing
Not delivering estimated savings on business publications contract
Callum Thomson
Being taken forward as part of normal business operations
Not delivering Data Architecture ancillary systems required to complete retirement of the SPP system
Alan Balharrie
New T&A system rolled out to plan. Remaining work to be scheduled in the BIT forward delivery plan
Resources not available for additional datasets identified as follow on items in Open Data closure report
Alan Balharrie
To be scheduled in the BIT forward delivery plan
Risk that the DPP savings/benefits and changes not realised or embedded in the long term
Michelle Hegarty
Ongoing change management plan
7.2. Outstanding issues and where ownership now lies.
Issue Owner Action
Continued pace of change and changing expectations of Members/staff/public
Michelle Hegarty
Session 5 Digital Strategy
Approval of full roll out of authoring tool in business products, and continued governance of the project.
Michelle Hegarty
June 2016 decision
Need identified to continue to develop SPS capability in digital skills
Group Heads working with HR
Will be supported through OD.
Current policy or practice limits or prevents use of devices in committee rooms
Susan Duffy To liaise with new Conveners group/PO/DPO
32
8. Programme Finance & NPV
8.1. The updated November 2014 business case forecast a total expenditure of
£3.18m with a Net Present Value of £646k.
8.2. Net Present Value (NPV) is the difference between the value of cash inflows
and the value of cash outflows taking into account inflation. A positive net
present value indicates that the projected savings or efficiencies generated
by a project exceed the anticipated costs.
8.3. The out turn of the programme is £2.752m spend with a NPV forecast of
£2.588m. The NPV includes the anticipated cost from the completion later
this year of the Business Products project and resultant further print and
publications savings. (NPV to date is £2.08m). Tables detailing the project
costs and NPV are available at Annex A.
Efficiencies
8.4. Where possible and proportionate to do so projects have estimated where
savings to budgets or process efficiencies are expected. An annual budget
saving of £653k is forecast along with an annual staff efficiency of £242k.
The figures are the net efficiency or saving expected after the project has
completed. In this iteration of the business case not every project has
reached the stage where this can be determined but those that have are
listed on the next page:
33
Annual Project Efficiency Savings
Project Staff Efficiency Saving
Budget Saving
Digital Documents & Meeting Packs
£17,000 £21,000
Data Architecture £65,000
Document & Records Management **
£150,000
Paper Smart £46,000
Business Publications* £586,000
Business Products £10,000
Totals £242,000 £653,000
* Figure based on saving on completion of remainder of Business Products project. ** Average figure.
On-Going costs
8.5. The table below shows where costs have been incurred in projects that will
be recurring after the programme. These costs have been accounted for in
the NPV.
Ongoing costs
Project Cost type Annual Cost
DRM License costs £12k
Business Products
Authoring Tool license costs
£24k
8.6. In the medium term it is likely that the wider shift towards delivering the
Parliament’s services and products across digital platforms and increasing
reliance on digital devices will have an impact on the range and type of
technical resource and capability required within BIT, especially if we are to
be able to not only support what we have introduced but also evolve our
approach. This is already being considered by the Group Head of Digital
Services via the Strategic Resources Board.
Annex A – Finance tables
34
Net Present Value
(£k) 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24
NPV 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
COSTS
Digital Parliament Programme Costs 669 60 432 188 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1. Documents & Records Management 790 28 212 306 46 35 42 43 43 43 43 43
2. Data Architecture 1,300 53 524 628 171 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3. Business Publications 81 20 40 5 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4. Digital Documents 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5. Paper Smart 19 3 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6. Digital Meeting facilities 177 0 142 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7. MSP Portal 58 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8. Rendering Tool 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9. Online Strategy 53 0 52 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10. MSP Portal 2 78 0 80 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11. MAQA Mobile 59 0 57 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12.Business Products 528 0 8 226 196 24 24 24 24 24 24 24
13. Open Data 137 15 47 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
14.MSP Portal 3 26 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 MSP - Election Guidance 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16. Digital meeting Packs* provisional 10 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL COSTS 4,008 194 1,674 1,530 450 59 66 66 67 67 67 67
BENEFITS
1. Documents & Records Management 1,308 -28 0 102 170 176 183 190 198 205 213 221
2. Data Architecture 650 175 0 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65
3. Business Publications 3,934 53 58 256 488 488 586 586 586 586 586 586
4. Digital Documents 63 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
5. Paper Smart 380 0 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46
6. Buiness Products 64 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
7. Digital meeting packs* provisional 196 0 0 0 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
TOTAL BENEFITS 6,595 207 111 476 816 822 926 934 941 949 956 964
NET BENEFIT 2,588 13 -1,564 -1,055 366 763 860 867 874 882 889 897
cumulative discounted Net Benefit 13 -1,498 -2,482 -2,152 -1,487 -763 -58 629 1,299 1,952 2,588
DISCOUNT RATE % 3.5 1.000 0.966 0.934 0.902 0.871 0.842 0.814 0.786 0.759 0.734 0.709
NPV £2,588
Annex A – Finance tables
35
Project Costs
Annex B – Project Details and Follow on actions
36
Project Description Follow on Actions/on-going costs
Members can create, use/re-use, share and collaborate on information as parliamentarians and
employers
MSP Portal 1
& 2
The MSP Portal provides Members with a single point of access to relevant information and services that are easy to find and simple to use. We have developed the MSP Portal to be the primary digital channel for Members’ information.
Ongoing development of the MSP Portal will be co-
ordinated with the online strategy in the session 5
Digital Strategy.
Portal –
session 5
This project oversaw a further development of the MSP Portal. Key guidance such as Code of Conduct and Standing orders can be accessed directly from the Portal and important information for Members in the few weeks after the election added.
MAQA Mobile Members can now submit and support Motions and Questions via the MSP Portal as well as from their desktop PC. Additional functionality requested by Members to allow for a 28 day search was also added.
The Chamber Desk will continue to monitor feedback on the new service.
Business
Products
This project reviewed and made recommendation on how business products are created and distributed to support digital working.
Three main areas were selected from the roadmap for inclusion in the Digital parliament programme:-
- The Business Bulletin has been redesigned both on the web and in the MSP Portal
-A pilot has been completed to enable SPICe research papers and Committee Reports to be produced in-house in a data ready format.
The project delivered a comprehensive roadmap for future delivery and this will be taken into account for Digital Session 5 Strategy.
Completion of the implementation of the new authoring tool for committee and SPICe reports is due in October, and will be overseen by the follow on Digital Governance to the Programme. The new authoring tool for committee and SPICe reports has an ongoing licence cost of £24k which will require to be budgeted by the relevant offices.
Annex B – Project Details and Follow on actions
37
Project Description Follow on Actions/on-going costs
Digital meeting
packs
This project following on from the digital documents project in wave 2. It saw a significant policy agreed by SPCB on Digital by default distribution and Included adding further meeting packs to the MSP Portal, SPCB, Conveners Group, Parliamentary Bureau and CPA Branch.
A number of follow on recommendations have been identified in the closure report. An interim business owner has been identified and engagement will follow under scoping, planning and governance for the Digital Strategy going forward.
Digital
Documents
The Digital Documents project was a core part of the first steps in achieving the goal of publishing all Parliamentary business documents digitally. It focused on supporting nominated staff to routinely provide a range of identified Parliamentary documents as fully functional PDFs. These included Committee packs and LG papers.
The project was subsequently followed up by the Digital Meeting Packs project.
Business
Publications
The Business Publication for a Digital Parliament (BPDP) project was an enabling project that supports the shift to digital working. The project has rationalised the production, publishing and distribution of core business publications in a digital format.
The change in contract once authoring tool is in place will be handled by the PIP office as normal business. The project has still to fully implement number of process changes and these have been recorded in the project closure report.
The SPS can create, produce, use/re-use, publish, collaborate and dispose of information efficiently
and effectively to support digital working and meet compliance requirements Data Architecture
The data architecture project has sought to ensure that the data underpinning the Digital Parliament programme is accurate, consistent, structured and complies with current data standards.
Remaining ancillary systems taken on by BIT in their forward delivery plan. . This will include the final decommissioning of the SPP Database.
Document & Records Management
The implementation of a Document and Records management (DRM) solution.
This has seen us move away from G:\ and H:\ drives to SPShare for the creation, use, collaboration, storage, management and disposal of documents and records.
A Record Centre has been created. This has enabled the process of records management to be standardised and,
The project team identified a number of follow on actions required to both maintain and improve SPShare. These will be owned under IMG team as part their normal business.
There is an associated licence cost for technologies within SPShare. This cost of £12k per annum will be budgeted for in future years by IMG
Annex B – Project Details and Follow on actions
38
Project Description Follow on Actions/on-going costs
for the most part automated.
We provide the public with open, accessible information and enable participation through multiple
online channels
Open Data The Open Data project has ensured that data held and stored by the Parliament is made available online for the use and re-use of citizens. A total of 75 datasets are available at data.parliament.scot
As part of the project deliverables, working arrangements are in place to enable the maintenance of the existing open datasets
There are a number of outstanding open datasets:
Votes, Official Report and the Register of Interests.
These all have a dependency on the Data
Architecture project; BIT have agreed that these
will be added to the Forward Delivery Plan (FDP)
and scheduled for summer 2016 release subject to
prioritisation of any future project work.
Online
Strategy
This project delivered a strategy for the best approach to online services and delivery to inform future projects around what we do with the Members' portal, our intranet and the website and our other online platforms.
Implementation of the online strategy will be included in the Session 5 Digital Strategy and Governance.
Members and SPS understand the benefits of digital working and have the capability to get the best
out of the digital working environment
Digital meeting Facilities
Six meeting rooms have been modernised with the addition of improved technology with a further two to be completed by the end of the programme. These rooms enable use of Skype for meetings well as flexible options for connecting mobile devices and laptops to the big screens to share information. Additionally Skype can also be used for screen sharing which allows participants to view meeting papers, agendas, and presentations during a video conference.
As part of the project a framework contract is now in place to support existing rooms and deliver additional facilities if required. The contract management is being taken on by FM. BIT and FM will continue to collaborate and support this service.
Paper Smart This project was responsible for looking at the holistic picture of paper use in the organisation and supporting
Responsibility for continued review of paper use has passed on to the Environmental Steering
Annex B – Project Details and Follow on actions
39
Project Description Follow on Actions/on-going costs
other projects such as business publications in the shift to digital working
The project has rolled out SecurePrint to all Multi-Function Devices (MFDs) across all staff areas, encouraging greater paper efficiency and also greater flexibility in print options. It has also enabled a rationalisation of desktop printers.
Group.
Annex C – Benefits Realisation Strategy
40
Increased choice for Members in ways to access our services
How will we do this?
Over the lifetime of this programme we will do new things, do things better and stop some
things . . .
Produce Parliamentary business information & services for digital consumption: Business Publications; Business products; Data Architecture; Open Data
The benefits being . . .
Members can create, use/ re-use, share and collaborate on
information as parliamentarians and employers
The SPS can create, produce, use/re-use, publish, collaborate and
dispose of information efficiently and effectively to meet compliance requirements and support digital
working
We provide the public with open, accessible information and enable
participation through multiple online channels
Members and SPS understand the benefits of digital working
environment and have the capability to get the best out of the digital
working environment
Improved customer experience for Members
Improved process efficiencies
Easier access to information
Improved digital literacy for Members and SPS
Meet information compliance requirements
Increased capability for continuous improvement
Establish effective digital channels for public participation :Online Strategy; Open Data
Adopt policies & procedures that support digital working and meet compliance requirements; PRSA plan; Online policies e.g. social media; Data Standards; Open Data Policy
Implement the capability to capture data once, re-use it, search it, independent of device/platform/storage: Data Architecture; Open Data
Produce secure, tailored mobile services and products available through dedicated digital channels : Mobile MAQA; Business Publications; Business Products; Online Strategy, Members Portal
Establish for SPS a collaborative information environment that is capable of creating using, sharing, declaring, transferring and disposing of documents and records: Documents &Records Mgt
Provide support, training and learning required to embrace digital working : Organisational Development (OD) plan- DPP element for members & SPS; online community groups; collaboration; innovation fund;
Enable and support the digital workplace: Paper Smart; Meeting Rooms; Business Publications
DIGITAL PARLIAMENT PROGRAMME
We have a vision to be able to consume our services digitally, enabling you to connect, communicate and
collaborate successfully with others.
Annex C – Benefits Realisation Strategy
41
Strategy planning overview
Benefits identification
Analysis and planning
Benefits Delivery
Benefits transition
Benefits Sustained
Identify and qualify business benefits and changes (new, improved, stopped) required for delivering desired outcomes and capabilities
Defined business changes in projects Defined Metrics Establish BRP and monitoring Map benefits
Monitor business change progress Maintain Benefits Register Report benefits
Develop transition plans to facilitate benefit and business change when turned over to impacted business/operational areas
Monitor performance of benefits beyond the close of the programme May 2016
2013-2014 Wave 1 and 2 benefits
planning Wave 3 in scoping expected to be in planning by July 2015.
In progress Business Products; Wave 3
deliverables Establish BRP and
monitoring
Map benefits
Monitor business
change progress Maintain Benefits
Register Report benefits June, Oct and February
2016
June – December 2015 Transition management process
delivered Performance monitoring reporting
Jan – June 2016 Benefits transition (project to business operations) & sustainment planning
and managing Benefits realisation report for programme
closure
Annex C Benefits realisation
42
The programme has used both quantitative and qualitative measures as shown below and this
has been documented in the benefits realisation plan and project benefit reporting:
Outcome Benefits Benefit Measures
Members can create, use/re-use,
share and collaborate on
information as parliamentarians
and employers
Increased choice for
Members in ways to
access our services
Improved customer
experience for Members
Easier access to
information
Improved process
efficiencies
Member satisfaction with the
changes
Members feedback
(March 2014, March 2015,
January 2016)
CRM feedback (ongoing)
Google analytics
Targeted cost savings
from the publications
budget.
The SPS can create, produce,
use/re-use, publish, collaborate
and dispose of information
efficiently and effectively to
support digital working and meet
compliance requirements
Improved process
efficiencies
Easier access to
information
Meet information
compliance
requirements
Delivery and implementation of
key systems and successful
business change
Staff survey responses
and acceptance sign off
(SPShare for corporate
Documents and Records
Management)
Data Architecture
milestones and
acceptance form system
users
Maturity model
(Compliance with Public
Records Scotland Act.
Efficiency savings across
DRM, and data
architecture
We provide the public with open,
accessible information and enable
Easier access to Feedback for Open Data service:
Annex C Benefits realisation
43
Outcome Benefits Benefit Measures
participation through multiple
online channels
information
Increased capability for
continuous improvement
Open Data Community
events/network
Feedback function on
website
Members and SPS understand the
benefits of digital working and
have the capability to get the best
out of the digital working
environment
Improved digital literacy
for Members and SPS
Increased capability for
continuous improvement
Member and staff digital
capability measured through
Members feedback
Analysis of OD
programmes response to
Digital Literacy
Feedback and analytics
from usage of Digital
Meeting Facilities
Staff survey responses
and acceptance sign off
(SPShare for corporate
Documents and Records
Management)
Annex D – Lessons Learned
44
1. The programme team along with project SROs and the programme board were asked
to consider what lessons could be taken from the programme in terms of a number of
factors across
Programme governance
Programme/project management
Resourcing
Benefits and Outcomes
Engagement & Communications
2. The table below summarises the key points and suggested/comments.
Programme Governance
Having a strategy and defined outcomes was very helpful in decision making and
prioritisation for the programme. Although it took a while to agree the final outcomes
and vision and to begin to deliver tangible outcomes once established the rolling
wave, iterative approach worked well and built confidence across the organisation
that the programme could deliver successfully. This model should be followed going
forward.
Having external members of Boards was seen to be very useful and those boards
that had external members gained a lot from their experience.
It will be important going forward into the next digital strategy to ensure that all digital
developments are co-ordinated as towards the end of the programme some offices
were going ahead with initiatives without consulting the programme board or team.
Digital should now be seen as a strategic imperative and there is a need to consider
how we judge investment accordingly.
The division of digital work from IT business area delivery proved difficult and could
be confusing at times. LG have already decided that the future strategy should
combine both so that prioritisation can fairly reflect both new digital initiatives and
ongoing development of existing systems.
There was recognition that there could have been more diversity on programme
boards across grade/age and gender boundaries. Many of the boards were
populated by LG members or office heads.
At programme board level there was a recommendation that in future long or
technical papers should come with short non-technical summaries.
Annex D – Lessons Learned
45
Programme/Project management
Having a sub programme team within BIT who co-ordinated the resourcing and
technical aspects in IT worked very well. Although resourcing was a constant
balancing act by mid-way through the programme changes were put in place that
should be built on for future similar endeavours.
There is still room for improvement on PPM skills as a whole and the new PPO
function should look at how development of both Project Managers and SROs can
be enhanced. New SROs and PMs found it difficult to get to grips with working in a
programme environment at times and consequently decisions were not always taken
at the appropriate level.
Some of the project teams questioned the bureaucracy around reporting to the
programme board and felt they were not clear on the role of the programme board v
their own project board. It was felt that especially for smaller projects there could be
a more streamlined approach and this is something the new PPO could look at.
It was felt that communications between the programme team and the projects was
effective, as well as the support from HR on training and development and the link
into SPLearning where required.
Resourcing
Although a significant amount of external contractors were brought in to BIT to
support the programme it became apparent there was a finite limit that could be
managed in terms of management overhead. There also needs to be time and
budget built in for knowledge transfer and handover from the start of projects.
Resource estimates for some projects tended to be overambitious at the outset. As
the programme learned more about what it was delivering this improved but projects
going forward should include more of an optimism bias, as well as adequate
contingency for overruns and post deployment changes and bug fixing.
It was felt that where teams were given dedicated resource to carry out projects it
was very successful and that the concentrated effort could deliver more, faster, than
asking people to work on projects in addition to normal roles. This applied to those
working on boards as well and, where necessary, dedicated resources should be
considered for future projects.
Some project teams found the resource allocation process with BIT difficult. In
general this reflects the sheer volume of work that BIT had to cope with in tandem
with normal day to day operations and other major programmes such as the 2016
Election. It is recommended BIT consider a refresh with offices generally of the
resource allocation process.
Annex D – Lessons Learned
46
Benefits and Outcomes
The benefits approach used in the programme has been very successful and should
be built upon for future projects and programmes. In particular mapping outcomes to
benefits was very useful in decision making on the required deliverables of projects
towards programme outcomes.
Given this was a new approach it took some time to establish across projects and
ideally the approach should be used from the outset in projects. PMs need to have a
better understanding of benefits measurement and this is something that the new
PPO function can build on in terms of competencies.
Engagement/Communication
Overall it was felt that the programme had excellent support from leadership group
which greatly facilitated the changes being made in the programme.
It was felt that engagement and communications generally in the programme were
very good. In particular the information available on the engagement site combined
with updates, blogs and videos kept staff informed of what was going on in the
programme.
A series of engagement with Members was used to both reinforce the message of
the programme and to gain insights into their priorities. This enabled the programme
to focus on delivering against those priorities.
It was suggested that at the end of the programme some communications go out
highlighting all that has been achieved as some staff may not be aware of everything
that has gone on.
Other/future
We need to consider carefully what resources we need as an organisation to
continue to develop our digital strategy for session 5.
Given the discussions around resourcing it is apparent that up front consideration
needs to be given to the resourcing of future digital work, particularly but not
exclusively within BIT. This work should be done in tandem with the session 5 Digital
Strategy