Circadian Dysfunction

download Circadian Dysfunction

of 8

Transcript of Circadian Dysfunction

  • 7/24/2019 Circadian Dysfunction

    1/8

    Circadian dysfunction in diseaseDavid A. Bechtold, Julie E. Gibbs and Andrew S.I. LoudonFaculty of Life Sciences, AV Hill Building, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT

    The classic view of circadian timing in mammals empha-sizes a light-responsive master clock within the hypo-thalamus which imparts temporal information to theorganism. Recent work indicates that such a unicentricmodel of the clock is inadequate. Autonomous circadiantimers have now been demonstrated in numerous brainregions and peripheral tissues in which molecular-clockmachinery drives rhythmic transcriptional cascades in atissue-specic manner. Clock genes also participate inreciprocal regulatory feedback with key signalling path-ways (including many nuclear hormone receptors),thereby rendering the clock responsive to the internalenvironment of the body. This implies that circadian-clock genes can directly affect previously unforeseenphysiological processes, and that amid such a networkof body clocks, internal desynchronisation may be a keyaspect to circadian dysfunction in humans. Here weconsider the implications of decentralised and internallyresponsive clockwork to disease, with a focus on energymetabolism and the immune response.

    Introduction Virtually all aspects of human physiology are mapped onto24-hour rhythms. These include sleep wake cycles, body temperature, hormone secretion, blood pressure, and

    metabolism. These biological rhythms are orchestrated by an endogenous circadian timing system that can generaterobust and temporally relevant (i.e. 24-hour) rhythms evenin the absence of external inputs, which neverthelessremains sensitive to environmental cues such as light.Internal timers enable us to anticipate uctuations in ourenvironment and adapt our physiology appropriately. Cri-tically,the circadian clock alsosynchronizes anddictates therelative phasing of diverse internal physiological processesand molecular pathways [1]. Such internal coordinationis essential to optimise our metabolic responses andstrengthen inherent homeostatic regulatory mechanisms.

    The impact of circadian timing on human health hasgarnered increasing attention over recent years, and circa-dian dysfunction is now considered to be a contributory factor to theincidenceandseverity of a wide rangeof clinicaland pathological conditions, including sleep disorders, can-cer, depression, metabolic syndrome, and inammation(Figure 1 ). Much of the initial evidence has come fromstudies demonstrating an increased association of diseasewith lifestyles that inherently disrupt our natural circadianbehavioural patterns such as chronic shift-work, frequentair travel, and chronic restriction of sleep. For example,careers involving long-term shift-work are associated with

    an increased incidence of cancer of the breast and colon[24]. A direct impact of circadian timingon tumourigenesismay be envisioned because numerous genes regulating thecell cycle such as Wee1 , cyclin D1 , and c-Myc are modulatedby the rhythmic activity of core clock genes [5,6] . The clock gene period has also been implicated directly in tumoursuppression and DNA repair in rodents [7,8] , seemingly independent of its function within the clock. Discerning the relative impact of disrupted circadian rhythms per sefrom the possible pleiotropic actions of individual core clock genes in human diseasewilltherefore be a challenge.Never-theless, specic clinical indications related to altered clock functionhavebeen recognised in certaincircumstances, andare already driving therapeutic advancements. Forexample, several sleep disorders have been linked directly to altered circadian function [9] (Box 1 ).

    In the current review, we briey discuss how the circa-dian clock engages with diverse physiological systemsthrough neuronal and molecular outputs. We then focuson two fundamental aspects of human physiology (energy metabolism and the immune system) to consider howdisruptions of the circadian clock may contribute to dis-ease.

    Anatomy of the circadian clock

    In mammals, the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus(SCN) serves as the predominant circadian timer in thebody, and is exquisitely responsive to light via the retinal hypothalamic tract. The dominance of the SCN in dictating rhythmic behaviours is demonstrated by studies of SCNtransplantation. Here, transplant of donor SCN tissue toanimals bearing SCN lesions (behaviourally arrhythmic)results in the restoration of behavioural rhythmicity whichmatches the circadian phenotype of the donor [1014] .SCN-derived signals involved in entraining locomotorrhythms are not yet fully characterised, but must includediffusible signals because encapsulated transplants canrestore rhythms to SCN-lesioned hosts. Yet, in contrast

    to locomotor activity, rhythms of secretion of melatoninand glucocorticoid are not restored after SCN transplants[11 15] . Furthermore, studies of clock gene rhythms inperipheral organs show that SCN transplantation can re-establish rhythmic expression of clock genes in some per-ipheral tissues (liver, kidney), but not others (heart,spleen) [14] . Together, these ndings demonstrate that acombination of humoral factors and directneuronal contactare required for the full dissemination of SCN temporalinformation to the CNS and peripheral organs.

    The neuronal projection pathways of the SCN are rela-tively well characterised, and provide the SCN accessto numerous brain regions and peripheral tissues [16] .The SCN projects heavily to other hypothalamic centres

    Review

    Corresponding authors: Bechtold, D.A. ( [email protected] );Gibbs, J.E. ( [email protected] ); Loudon, A.S.I.([email protected] )

    0165-6147/$ see front matter 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2010.01.002 Available online 18 February 2010 191

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2010.01.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2010.01.002mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 7/24/2019 Circadian Dysfunction

    2/8

    [17 20] . Through such connections, the SCN is thought toimpose temporal gating to homeostatic responses of the

    hypothalamus, as well as drive the rhythmic release of hormonal signals such as secretion of melatonin fromthe pineal gland. For example, circadian componentsof sleep wake cycles are driven principally throughSCN projections to the dorsomedial hypothalamus(DMN) and posterior hypothalamic area [21] . Importantly,the SCN can also access peripheral organ systems via

    paraventricular nucleus (PVN) connections to the sym-pathetic and parasympathetic neural pathways [22,23] .

    It has been demonstrated that the liver, the pancreas,and the visceral adipose tissue all share a common andspecic neuronal connection with the PVN, DMN, and SCN[18] . The importance of autonomic pathways in theentrainment and synchronisation of peripheral tissuesby the SCN is highlighted in studies which show thataltered outputs to peripheral organs may underlie thedamping of circadian rhythms observed in metabolic syn-drome (obesity and type-2 diabetes) [24,25] .

    Work over the past decade has shown that the capacity for circadian timing is not limited to the SCN, and many other brain regions, as well as virtually all peripheraltissues can self-sustained circadian oscillation [2634] .Under normal circumstances, it is likely that theseextra-SCN clocks are subordinate to, and synchronisedby the SCN. Nevertheless, local timing systems are clearly important for individual tissue and organ function. Forexample, disruption of the clock specically within the livercauses fasting hypoglycaemia, exaggerated clearance of glucose, and loss of rhythmic expression of hepatic glucoseregulatory genes [35] . We must therefore concede thatcircadian rhythms in behaviour and physiology aredirected by a network of oscillators distributed acrossthe body. In the context of multiple body clocks, it isimportant to note that, aside from light-entrainment (of the SCN), the circadian system is highly responsive to non-photic entraining stimuli such as meal timing, exercise,

    and strong social interaction.

    The molecular clockThe molecular basis of circadian timing involves interlock-ing transcriptional/translational feedback loops which cul-minate in the rhythmic expression and activity of a set of core clock genes ( Figure 2 and below). Rhythmic clock genes then dictate the expression of many other genes(clock-controlled genes, CCGs), which in turn drive cas-cades of rhythmic gene expression. The impact of thesetranscriptional outputs is pronounced; gene microarray studies show that at least 10% of total cellular transcriptsoscillate in a circadian manner [32,36 40] . Interestingly, if

    Figure 1 . Clocks and diseaseInappropriate or dampened circadian rhythms in behaviour and physiology can result from clock gene polymorphisms, de-synchronisation of our environment andbehaviour from our natural endogenous clocks, as well as during aging. Recent evidence suggests that disruption of the circadian system is a contributory factor to clinicaland pathological conditions including sleep disorders, cancer, depression, the metabolic syndrome, and inflammation.

    Box 1. PERIOD phosphorylation: genetic disorder to drugdevelopment

    A range of human sleep disorders have been linked to circadianalterations in the timing of sleep wake cycles. These disordersinclude advanced sleep phase syndrome (ASPS), delayed sleepphase syndrome (DSPS), non-24-hour sleep wake syndrome, andirregular sleep wake patterning [122] . A familial (inherited) form of advanced sleep-phase syndrome (FASPS) is characterised by apersistent and substantial ( 4 hours) advance in sleep onset andawakening times [123,124] , and was the first disorder to link aknown core clock gene directly to a human sleep disorder.

    FASPS has been linked to alteration in PERIOD protein phosphor-ylation by the enzymes casein kinase 1 e and d (CK1e and d).Mutations in the PER2 (S662G), and CK1 d (T44A) genes have beenidentified in FASPS lineages [125,126] , and both are now known toalter CK1-mediated PER phosphorylation. PER phosphorylation byCK1 influences transcriptional feedback within the clock by alteringthe degradation rate and/or subcellular (nuclear) localisation of thePER proteins [125,127,128] . Thus, the molecular basis of this form of FASPS seems to be caused by an increased turnover of nuclearPER2. Similarly, the tau mutation in hamsters [129] and mice [121] ,which lies within the substrate-binding domain of CK1 e , accelerates

    behavioural rhythms by 4 hours. This mutation leads to hyper-phosphorylation-mediated destabilisation of the PER proteinthrough an increase in targeted degradation [120,121,130] . Impress-ively, the 4-hour acceleration in circadian period can be observedfrom gene rhythms in single cells, to SCN and peripheral tissueoscillations, as well as in gross behavioural outputs such aslocomotor activity, metabolic rate and feeding cycles [121,130] .

    These observations have driven the development of novelpharmaceutical agents that specifically target the enzymatic activityof CK1 e and d. Importantly, these agents can alter the inherentproperties of the clock (phase and period), in vitro and in vivo in adose-dependent manner [131,132] . It is tempting to speculate thatthese agents may eventually provide a therapeutic route tomodulate or strengthen endogenous rhythms, and have far-reach-ing implications for human health.

    Review Trends in Pharmacological Sciences Vol.31 No.5

    192

  • 7/24/2019 Circadian Dysfunction

    3/8

    different tissues are compared, there is relatively littleoverlap observed in the genes that cycle. This demon-strates that the circadian system can inuence diversephysiological processes in a tissue-specic manner.

    Initially, the circadian clock was dened as a relatively

    simple feedback loop based on the reciprocal interaction of activators CLOCK and BMAL1 and repressors PERIODand CRYPTOCHROME ( Figure 2 ). Within this loop,CLOCK and BMAL1 heterodimers bind to E-box enhancerelements within the promoter region of the Per and Crygenes to activate their transcription with subsequent inhi-bition of CLOCK/BMAL1 activity by PER/CRY heterodi-mers. It is now clear that the clock incorporates many auxiliary feedback loops, the most prominent of whichinvolves the nuclear hormone receptors (NRs) REV-ERBand ROR [41,42] . REV-ERB and ROR repress and activateBMAL1 expression, respectively, through shared ROR-binding elements (ROREs) within the BMAL1 promoter

    [41,42] . Just as the clock feedback loops produce rhythmicoscillations in CLOCK/BMAL1, REV-ERB and ROR,similar rhythmic expression cycles are imposed onto any genes which are responsive to these transcription factorsthrough E-box, RORE and D-box (recognised by the CCG,

    DBP) enhancer elements.Chromatin remodelling also appears to be an important

    component in facilitating clock-regulated gene expression.CLOCK has recently been shown to function as a histoneacetyltransferase (HAT) [43,44] , and transcriptionalrhythms in gene expression can be accompanied by rhythms in histone acetylation, including within the pro-moter regions of the PER1, PER2 and CRY1 genes [45] .HAT activity (acetylation) attaches an acetyl group tothe histone, which serves to loosen chromatin structureand facilitate gene transcription. SIRT1, a protein exten-sively linked to energy metabolism and aging [46] , hasbeen identied as a histone deacetylase (HDAC) that

    Figure 2 . Molecular clock machineryThe molecular machinery that provides circadian timekeeping consists of a complex circuitry of transcriptional/translational regulatory feedback loops (clock componentsshown in grey). In mammals, the current model involves a primary loop with CLOCK (or homologue NPAS2) and BMAL1 as transcriptional activators, and PERIOD (PER1,PER2 and PER3) and CRYPTOCHROME proteins (CRY1 and CRY2) as transcriptional repressors [1,119] . As levels of cytosolic PER and CRY proteins rise, they associate,translocate to the nucleus, and repress their own gene transcription through direct interaction with the CLOCK/BMAL1 complex. This feedback cycle provides near 24-hourtiming, and drives the rhythmic expression of several clock-controlled and clock-modulated genes, which in turn mediate circadian rhythms in behaviour and physiology.Acting on the primary feedback loop are auxiliary loops, which appear to increase the stability and robustness of the oscillations. The most notable interlocking loop is thatinvolving the nuclear hormone receptors (NRs), REV-ERB and ROR [41,42] . In addition to REV-ERB and ROR, several other NRs (shown in green) interact closely with thecircadian feedback loops, and are responsive to the clock (exhibit rhythmic expression) and able to feedback onto the clock genes themselves. NR regulation of clock genesalso renders the clock responsive to numerous circulating hormones (e.g. cortosol, estrogen), nutrient signals (e.g. derivatives of fatty acids and retinoids) and cellularredox status (NADH/NAD + ratio).Clock proteins are also subject to extensive post-translational modulation that serves to reinforce and fine-tune its 24-hour cycle length. For example, phosphorylation of PER proteins by casein kinase 1 (CK1) e and d isoforms has significant influence over the duration of the circadian cycle duration (period) [120,121] . Moreover, rhythms inprotein acetylation (mediated by CLOCK acetylase and SIRT1 deacetylase activities) are important in modulating the amplitude and phase of clock gene rhythms, as well asconferring circadian transcriptional regulation to clock-controlled genes [45,51 53] . BMAL1 and PER are subject to acetylation (red stars), which serves to stabilise theproteins and enhance activity. Cellular energy supply (reflected in ATP/ADP and NAD + /NADH cycles) directly influences clock activity through SIRT1 and AMPK activities.These auxiliary feedback loops and post-translational controls can modify the internal characteristics of the clock (e.g. the phase, amplitude and period of rhythmic geneexpression), making them intriguing targets for pharmacological intervention.

    Review Trends in Pharmacological Sciences Vol.31 No.5

    193

  • 7/24/2019 Circadian Dysfunction

    4/8

    counteracts CLOCK-mediated acetylation [47,48] . Targetsof CLOCK acetylation and/or SIRT1 deacetylation cyclesinclude not only histones [44] , but also clock components(e.g. BMAL1, PER2) and metabolic and inammatory regulators (e.g. PGC-1 a , PPAR a , NF- kB) [4750] . Rhyth-mic acetylation is likely to be important in modifying thestrength and phase of clock gene rhythms, as well asconferring circadian transcriptional regulation to CCGs

    [45,51 53] .

    Outputs of the clockThus, through transcriptional and epigenetic modulation,clock genes drive the expression of an extensive and diversesetof CCGs, which in turn drive cascades of gene expressionthat ultimately dictate rhythmic aspects of our behaviourand physiology.The rst line of CCGs directly responsive tocore clock gene regulation such as members of thePAR bZIPfamily (e.g. DBP, TEF, HLF) [54] are themselves majortranscriptional regulators. Another group of CCGs whichlink the clock to virtually all physiological processes in thebody includes members of the nuclear hormone receptor

    (NR) family ( Box 2 ). Many members of this family arerhythmically regulated at the level of receptor expressionor via rhythmic ligand binding, with over half of the 48 NRgenes exhibiting rhythmic expression in a tissue-specicmanner [55] . Further, it is now evident that many NRscan modulate clock gene expression ( Figure 2 ).

    Aside from their direct involvement in the clock machin-ery, REV-ERB and ROR are implicated in lipid metab-

    olism, adipogenesis, and the inammatory response [5658] . Until recently, REV-ERB a and REV-ERB b were con-sidered to be constitutively active orphan receptors,although heme has now been shown to bind reversibly to both receptors and drive ligand-dependent activity [59] . This implies that REV-ERB (and in turn clock activity) are responsive to the cellular redox state andperhaps gaseous signalling molecules (NO and CO)

    through interactions with heme [60] . Similarly, glucocor-ticoids and retinoic acid can synchronise and reset periph-eral clocks through their respective NRs [6163] , andPPARs, which are often rhythmically expressed in aCLOCK/BMAL1-dependent manner, can modify BMAL1expression [32,64] . PPARs bind fatty-acid derivatives, areinvolved in lipid metabolism, and are also responsive toenergy status [65] .

    Consequently, NRs are not only important outputslinking the clock to most physiological processes, but alsorender the clock responsive to circulating hormones (e.g.cortisol, estrogen) and metabolic signals (e.g. derivatives of fatty acids and retinoids), as well as cellular energy and

    redox status ( Figure 2 ). Interestingly, many NRs with thecapacity to alter clock function are centrally involved inenergy metabolism and the immune system. In the follow-ing sections, we consider recent evidence linking circadiandysfunction in these two physiological systems.

    Circadian gating of the inammatory responseSeveral inammatory diseases exhibit a circadianelement to their symptoms. For example, patients withrheumatoid arthritis report daily variations in theirsymp-toms, experiencing greater joint pain, stiffness and func-tional disability in the mornings [66] . Some asthmapatients experience night-time exacerbations (nocturnalasthma) that can be attributed (at least in part) to daily variations in lung physiology (i.e airway narrowing), butalso increased bronchial responsiveness at night [67] .Circadian inuences on the expression and circulating level of immunomodulatory factors (hormones, cytokines)have also been documented [68] . These no doubt contrib-ute to uctuations in symptom severity, yet more intimatefeedback between the molecular clock and inammatory pathways are now being uncovered.

    At this point, there is a relative paucity of data directly linking core clock proteins with inammatory pathways.Nonetheless, evidence from in-vivo studies suggest that asystemic inammatory stimulus (i.e. lipopolysaccharide(LPS) administration) canmodulate the expression of clock

    genes (including per1/2 , bmal1 ) in the SCN, PVN andperipheral tissues, although some discrepancies exist be-tween studies [6971] . In addition, it has been demon-strated through microarray analysis that a group of immunoregulatory genes show a strong circadian patternof expression in the mouse liver, and this rhythmic expres-sion is lost in clock mutant mice [37] . Direct modulation of the immune response by the clock is also suggested by studies showing that the induction of pro-inammatory cytokines IFN g and IL-1 b after LPS challenge aredecreased in per2 / mice compared with wild-type mice[72] . Furthermore, polymorphisms in per3 have beenassociated with circulating levels of IL-6 [73] , and mice

    Box 2. Nuclear hormone receptors

    The human genome contains 48 nuclear hormone receptor (NR)genes, comprising a large family of ligand-dependent transcriptionfactors. In contrast to most classic receptors, NRs bind directly toDNA to modulate transcription, and ligand interactions occurprimarily within the cell cytosol or nucleus. NRs are key regulatorsof most major physiological processes (e.g. development, repro-duction, metabolism, inflammation and immunity), and NR ligandsinclude steroid and thyroid hormones, vitamin A and D derivatives,oxysterols, and fatty-acid derivatives. The structure of NRs isrelatively well conserved, with an amino-terminal regulatorydomain, central DNA-binding domain, and carboxy-terminal li-gand-binding domain. The receptors function as homodimers orheterodimers binding at specific hormone response elements(HSEs) within the gene promoter, and upon activation recruit co-regulatory proteins to modulate transcription. Such co-regulatorycomplexes often include proteins with intrinsic histone acetyltrans-ferase (HAT) or histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity, which repressor activate (respectively) transcription by altering the density of DNAhistone interactions. Although the mechanism remains un-clear, it is likely that NRs can also participate in non-genomicsignalling, evident by the fact that some ligand-mediated effects canbe observed within minutes of administration.

    NRs are now recognised as key intermediaries between themolecular clock machinery and a wide array of physiologicalprocesses ( Figure 2 ), and two NRs, REV-ERB and ROR are bona- fide components of the clock. More than half of the NR familyexhibit rhythmic expression in a tissue-specific manner, and manycan feedback directly onto the clock itself [55,60] . For example,glucocorticoids and retinoic acid can synchroniss and resetperipheral clocks. Further, the core clock protein BMAL1 participatesin reciprocal transcriptional feedback with RORs, RER-ERBs, andPPARs. Clock NR interactions are likely to contribute to circadiandysfunction in disease, and represent targets for pharmacologicalmodulation.

    Review Trends in Pharmacological Sciences Vol.31 No.5

    194

  • 7/24/2019 Circadian Dysfunction

    5/8

    experiencing repeated phase shifts (to mimic shift-work inhumans) exhibit heightened responses to subsequentinammatory challenge [74] .

    The mechanisms through which immune and inam-matory cells might be inuenced or entrained by the SCNare not presently clear, although a likely possibility is viasecretion of glucocorticoids and melatonin. Importantly,inammatory responses also appear to be gated at a local

    level, within the mediating cells themselves. For example,peritoneal macrophages exhibit rhythmic clock geneexpression, are capable of autonomous gene oscillationin culture, and exhibit circadian gating in their responsesto LPS challenge [7577] . Gene microarray studies demon-strate that numerous genes involved in LPS responsepathways are rhythmically expressed in mouse macro-phages, suggesting a direct inuence of the clock on inam-matory responses [76] .

    An important pathway through which the circadianclock may modify immune/inammatory responses is theNF- kB signalling cascade. The NF- kB pathway regulatesthe immune response to infection by controlling transcrip-

    tion of target inammatory genes. In non-stimulated cells,NF- kB dimers are sequestered in the cytoplasm by I kBswhich mask the nuclear localisation signal; upon acti- vation I kB is degraded to allow NF kB to enter the nucleusand activate target genes. Importantly, bmal1 knockdownin mouse peritoneal macrophages using siRNA can reducecytokine expression in concert with reduced activity of NF-kB [75] . Of note, SIRT1 has also been shown to modify theactivity of NF- kB and the release of TNF a after LPStreatment of macrophages [78] .

    The impact of the clock on the immune and inamma-tory response may be indirect and involve downstreamCCGs such as the NRs. A link between NRs and inam-mation has been established. In particular, through theuse of animal models of allergic airway disease (ovalbuminchallenge) and innate airway inammation (LPS chal-lenge), ROR a , PPAR a and PPAR g have been associatedwith the pathogenesis of pulmonary inammatory diseases[79 81] . A link between REV-ERB a and the pulmonary innate immune response has also been established. Werecently demonstrated that Rev-erb a / mice exhibit aheightened inammatory response to LPS administration(signicantly increased release of specic cytokines andenhanced neutrophil recruitment to the lung) and thatapplication of a REV-ERB ligand to human alveolar macro-phages signicantly reduces the LPS-driven release of IL-6[77] . Moreover, pharmacological targeting of NRs (in-

    cluding LXR and PPAR) has been successful in demon-strating their involvement in pulmonary inammation,and highlighted their potential as pharmaceutical targets.For example, the PPAR ligands fenobrate and rosiglita-zone reduce pulmonary inammation (recruitment of inammatory cells and cytokine production) after LPSadministration to mice [79,82] .

    As yet, there is limited evidence to indicate the mech-anisms through which these receptors affect inammatory pathways. LXR and REV-ERB a can interact to affectexpression of the pattern recognition receptor Toll-likereceptor 4 (involved in the innate immune response)[83] , but this is the only known nuclear receptor/receptor

    interaction reported to date. Several NRs are likely tomodulate the inammatory response through direct inter-actions with the NF- kB signalling pathway [80,84 86] . Forexample, experiments in human primary smooth musclecells indicate that ROR a 1 directly induces I kBa via aresponse element in its promoter [83] .

    Clock dysfunction in the metabolic syndrome

    Several recent studies suggest that disruption of daily metabolic rhythms is an exacerbating factor in the meta-bolic syndrome (obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease)[87 90] . The contribution of the circadian system in reg-ulating metabolism has received increasing attention overrecent years [9195] . Many metabolic processes exhibitcoordinated circadian oscillation, such as feeding beha- viour and the metabolism of glucose and lipids [9698] ,and many genes involved in metabolic control are rhyth-mically expressed [32,33,36,99 101] . Further, shift-work and sleep deprivation are known to dampen rhythms ingrowth hormone and melatonin, reduce insulin sensitivity,and elevate circulating cortisol levels [102] . These changes

    favour weight gain, obesity, and development of the meta-bolic syndrome. The importance of a functional circadiansystem in the regulation of metabolism is also evident fromstudies of animals with disrupted clock gene expression orfunction [103 106] . Forexample, clock mutant mice exhibita reduced metabolic rate and obesity [103] .

    Metabolic processes are readily decoupled from theprimarily light-driven SCN when food intake is desynchro-nised from normal daily patterns of activity. This has beenextensively modelled in rodents using restricted feeding schedules (RFS) [107,108] . Under RFS, numerous physio-logical and metabolic functions become entrained to theavailability of food, e.g. locomotor activity, insulin andcorticosterone release. Therefore, rhythmic feeding appears to be the dominant Zeitgeber for peripheral circa-dian oscillators [31] , presumably to ensure optimal syn-chrony between metabolic processes and food intake. Forexample, clock gene rhythms in the liver can entrain toRFS within two days even though SCN activity remainslocked to light dark cues throughout the duration of RFS[109] . This implies that internal de-synchronisation(decoupling of peripheral clocks from the SCN) could resultfrom lifestyles that oppose natural circadian rhythms.Scheer and colleagues recently examined the effects of such internal de-synchrony in humans by placing subjectson a 28-hour daily routine for 10 days [110] . Similar toobservations made using animal models, rhythms in body

    temperature remain tied to a 24-hour cycle; while others(such as leptin and insulin) adhered to the new 28 hour-based cycles of food intake. Interestingly, circadian (24-hour) and behavioural (28-hour) misalignment caused asuppression of circulating leptin, an elevation of bloodglucose, and hypertension. Therefore, similar to changesobserved with chronic sleep deprivation [102] , misalign-ment triggers a perceived state of energy decit, alteredglucose homeostasis, and decreased insulin sensitivity, allof which predispose to the metabolic syndrome. Sleeprestriction can also increase levels of the orexigenic hor-mone ghrelin, which has been strongly implicated in foodanticipation and meal entrainment [111] .

    Review Trends in Pharmacological Sciences Vol.31 No.5

    195

  • 7/24/2019 Circadian Dysfunction

    6/8

    The mechanisms involved in clock entrainment to meta-bolic signals remainunclear. The direct inuence of cellularenergy and redox status on clock genes has been demon-strated. For example, the activities of CLOCK/BMAL1 andSIRT1 areresponsive to the intracellular ratio of reduced-to-oxidized nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) cofac-tors, a ratio which is closely tied to cellular energy metab-olism [97,112,113] , and uctuations in glucose itself can

    modulate and entrain circadian oscillations in cells grownin culture [114] . Further, as mentioned above, the clock machinery is responsive to several genes which are them-selves responsive to cellular and global energy status, in-cluding SIRT1, the PPARs, and PGC-1 a . Feedback fromthese genes would therefore render the clock responsive tometabolic cues ( Figure 2 ). The PPARs and PGC-1 a regulategenes involved in many aspects of energy homeostasis,including the metabolism of glucose and lipids [115,116] ,andtheirexpressionsand activities areresponsive to energy status and feeding cues [65] . In mice, PGC-1 a is rhythmi-cally expressed, and stimulates bmal1 and REV-ERB atranscription through association of ROR a [117] . Pgc-

    1a

    /

    mice display metabolic and circadian abnormalities,including altered weight gain, muscle dysfunction, hepaticsteatosis, as well as altered daily rhythms of activity, body temperature, and metabolic rate [115,117] . Interestingly,PGC-1 a knockout mice appear to have a reduced ability tophase-reset liver clock gene expression in response to a shiftfrom night-restricted to day-restricted feeding [117] ,suggesting that feedback between PGC-1 a and core clock genes may be required for optimal entrainment of periph-eral clocks to energy-related cues.

    The sensitivity of different body clocks to metabolicinput may be dictated to a great extent by the local(tissue-specic) expression of energy-responsive genes(e.g. PPAR a , PGC-1 a , SIRT1). Therefore, imposition of chronic and inappropriate metabolic inputs onto the clock through metabolic regulators such as PGC-1 a might con-tribute to damping of metabolic rhythms observed inobesity. Additionally, the uncoupling of peripheral circa-dian oscillators like those in the liver from the SCN during altered energy status raises the distinct possibility thatabnormal energy supply (including unrestricted hyper-caloric food intake and feeding schedules that are outof synchrony with normal patterns of behaviour) may beeffective at dampening the hypothalamic control of metab-olism. Therefore, therapeutic strategies aimed at strength-ening clock synchrony, minimising periods of internal de-synchrony experienced during repeated behavioural phase

    shifting (shift-work), and reinforcing circadian rhythms inpatients with metabolic syndrome should be pursued.

    Future perspectivesCircadian dysfunction is clearly linked to human patho-physiology whether as a contributing factor or con-sequence. Nevertheless, clinical implications of clock gene polymorphisms and mutations have been identiedand are driving the development of novel therapeutics. Thechallenge remains to determine what impact the disrup-tion of circadian rhythms per se has on disease states suchas cancer and the metabolic syndrome, rather than thepleiotropic effects of clock genes independent of their role

    in circadian timing. Nevertheless, targeting the circadianclock as a mechanism for strengthening inherent homeo-static and defence mechanisms would seem an importantand potentially fruitful therapeutic aim. Key sites fortherapeutic targeting include primary CCGs, particularly those capable of feeding back onto the clock (i.e. NRs), aswell as clock-associated enzymes such as CK-1, AMPK, andSIRT1. Several pharmaceutical tools have recently been

    developed which target all three enzymes [118] , and it willbe interesting to see if these agents may be useful inmodulating clock activity in vivo .

    Disclosure StatementDAB, JEG, and ASIL have no conicts of interest relating to the content, writing or publication of this work. Ourwork is supported by the Biotechnology and BiologicalSciences Research Council (BBSRC), UK.

    References1 Reppert, S.M. and Weaver, D.R. (2002) Coordination of circadian

    timing in mammals. Nature 418, 935 9412 Schernhammer, E.S. et al. (2001) Rotating night shifts and risk of

    breast cancer in women participating in the nurses health study. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 93, 1563 1568

    3 Schernhammer, E.S. et al. (2003) Night-shift work and risk of colorectal cancer in the nurses health study. J. Natl. Cancer Inst.95, 825 828

    4 Davis, S. et al. (2001)Nightshiftwork,light at night, andrisk ofbreastcancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 93, 1557 1562

    5 Levi, F. and Schibler, U. (2007) Circadian rhythms: mechanisms andtherapeutic implications. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 47, 593 628

    6 Sahar, S. and Sassone-Corsi, P. (2007) Circadian clock and breastcancer: a molecular link. Cell Cycle 6, 1329 1331

    7 Fu,L. et al. (2002)The circadiangene Period2playsan important roleintumor suppression and DNA damage response in v ivo. Cell 111, 41 50

    8 Matsuo, T. et al. (2003) Control mechanism of the circadian clock fortiming of cell division in vivo. Science 302, 255 259

    9 Takahashi, J.S. et al. (2008) The genetics of mammalian circadian

    order and disorder: implications for physiology and disease. Nat. Rev.Genet. 9, 764 77510 Sawaki, Y. e t al. (1984) Transplantation of the neonatal

    suprachiasmatic nuclei into rats with complete bilateralsuprachiasmatic lesions. Neurosci. Res. 1, 67 72

    11 Meyer-Bernstein, E.L. et al. (1999) Effects of suprachiasmatictransplants on circadian rhythms of neuroendocrine function ingolden hamsters. Endocrinology 140, 207 218

    12 Ralph, M.R. et al. (1990) Transplanted suprachiasmatic nucleusdetermines circadian period. Science 247, 975 978

    13 Silver, R. et al. (1996) A diffusible coupling signal from thetransplanted suprachiasmatic nucleus controlling circadianlocomotor rhythms. Nature 382, 810 813

    14 Guo, H. et al. (2006) Suprachiasmatic regulation of circadian rhythmsof gene expression in hamster peripheral organs: effects of transplanting the pacemaker. J. Neurosci. 26, 6406 6412

    15 Sujino, M. et al. (2003) Suprachiasmatic nucleus grafts restorecircadian behavioral rhythms of genetically arrhythmic mice. Curr. Biol. 13, 664 668

    16 LeSauter, J. and Silver, R. (1998) Output signals of the SCN.Chronobiol. Int. 15, 535 550

    17 Buijs, R.M. and Kalsbeek, A. (2001) Hypothalamic integration of central and peripheral clocks. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 521 526

    18 Bartness, T.J. et al. (2001) SCN efferents to peripheral tissues:implications for biological rhythms. J. Biol. Rhythms 16, 196 204

    19 Vujovic, N. et al. (2008) Sympathetic input modulates, but does notdetermine, phase of peripheral circadian oscillators. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 295, R355 360

    20 Bando, H. et al. (2007) Vagal regulation of respiratory clocks in mice. J. Neurosci. 27, 4359 4365

    21 Saper, C.B. et al. (2005) Hypothalamic regulation of sleep andcircadian rhythms. Nature 437, 1257 1263

    Review Trends in Pharmacological Sciences Vol.31 No.5

    196

  • 7/24/2019 Circadian Dysfunction

    7/8

    22 Ruiter, M. et al. (2006) Hormones and the autonomic nervous systemare involved in suprachiasmatic nucleus modulation of glucosehomeostasis. Curr. Diabetes Rev. 2, 213 226

    23 Berthoud, H.R. (2002) Multiple neural systems controlling foodintakeand body weight. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 26, 393 428

    24 Cailotto, C. et al. (2008)Dailyrhythms in metabolic liver enzymes andplasma glucose require a balance in the autonomic output to the liver. Endocrinology 149, 1914 1925

    25 Kalsbeek, A. et al. (2007) Minireview:Circadian control of metabolismby the suprachiasmatic nuclei. Endocrinology 148, 5635 5639

    26 Abe, M. et al. (2002) Circadian rhythms in isolated brain regions. J. Neurosci. 22, 350 356

    27 Cermakian, N. et al. (2002) Light induction of a vertebrate clock geneinvolves signaling through blue-light receptors and MAP kinases.Curr. Biol. 12, 844 848

    28 Granados-Fuentes, D. et al. (2004) The suprachiasmatic nucleusentrains, but does not sustain, circadian rhythmicity in theolfactory bulb. J. Neurosci. 24, 615 619

    29 Lamont, E.W. et al. (2005) The central and basolateral nuclei of theamygdala exhibit opposite diurnal rhythms of expression of the clock protein Period2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 4180 4184

    30 Reick, M. et al. (2001) NPAS2: an analog of clock operative in themammalian forebrain. Science 293, 506 509

    31 Schibler, U. et al. (2003) Peripheral circadian oscillators in mammals:time and food. J. Biol. Rhythms 18, 250 260

    32 Panda, S. et al. (2002) Coordinated transcription of key pathways in

    the mouse by the circadian clock. Cell 109, 307 32033 Storch, K.F. et al. (2002) Extensive and divergent circadian gene

    expression in liver and heart. Nature 417, 78 8334 Yoo, S.H. et al. (2004) PERIOD2::LUCIFERASE real-time reporting

    of circadian dynamics reveals persistent circadian oscillations inmouse peripheral tissues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101, 5339 5346

    35 Lamia, K.A. et al. (2008) Physiological signicance of a peripheraltissuecircadian clock. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105,15172 15177

    36 Akhtar, R.A. et al. (2002) Circadian cycling of the mouse livertranscriptome, as revealed by cDNA microarray, is driven by thesuprachiasmatic nucleus. Curr. Biol. 12, 540 550

    37 Oishi, K. et al. (2003) Genome-wide expression analysis of mouse liverreveals CLOCK-regulated circadian output genes. J. Biol. Chem. 278,41519 41527

    38 Oishi, K. et al. (2005) Genome-wide expression analysis reveals 100

    adrenal gland-dependent circadian genes in the mouse liver. DNA Res. 12, 191 202

    39 Miller, B.H. et al. (2007) Circadian and CLOCK-controlled regulationof the mouse transcriptome and cell proliferation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104, 3342 3347

    40 McCarthy, J.J. e t al . (2007) Identication of the circadiantranscriptome in adult mouse skeletal muscle. Physiol. Genomics31, 86 95

    41 Preitner, N. et al. (2002) The orphan nuclear receptor REV-ERBalphacontrols circadian transcription within the positive limb of themammalian circadian oscillator. Cell 110, 251 260

    42 Emery, P. and Reppert, S.M. (2004) A rhythmic Ror. Neuron 43, 443 446

    43 Nakahata, Y. et al. (2007) Signaling to the circadian clock: plasticity by chromatin remodeling. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 19, 230 237

    44 Doi, M. et al. (2006) Circadian regulator CLOCK is a histone

    acetyltransferase. Cell 125, 497 50845 Etchegaray, J.P. et al. (2003) Rhythmic histone acetylation underliestranscription in the mammalian circadian clock. Nature 421, 177 182

    46 Michan, S. and Sinclair, D. (2007) Sirtuins in mammals: insights intotheir biological function. Biochem. J. 404, 1 13

    47 Asher, G. et al. (2008) SIRT1regulatescircadian clockgene expressionthrough PER2 deacetylation. Cell 134, 317 328

    48 Nakahata, Y. et al. (2008) The NAD+-dependent deacetylase SIRT1modulates CLOCK-mediated chromatin remodeling and circadiancontrol. Cell 134, 329 340

    49 Rodgers, J.T. et al. (2008) Metabolic adaptations through the PGC-1alpha and SIRT1 pathways. FEBS Lett. 582, 46 53

    50 Hirayama, J. et al. (2007) CLOCK-mediated acetylation of BMAL1controls circadian function. Nature 450, 1086 1090

    51 Curtis, A.M. et al. (2004) Histone acetyltransferase-dependentchromatin remodeling and the vascular clock. J. Biol. Chem. 279,7091 7097

    52 Naruse, Y. (2004) Circadian and light-induced transcription of clock gene Per1 depends on histoneacetylation and deacetylation. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 6278 6287

    53 Ripperger, J.A. and Schibler, U. (2006) Rhythmic CLOCK-BMAL1binding to multiple E-box motifs drives circadian Dbp transcriptionand chromatin transitions. Nat. Genet. 38, 369 374

    54 Gachon, F. et al. (2006) The circadian PAR-domain basic leucinezipper transcription factors DBP, TEF, and HLF modulate basaland inducible xenobiotic detoxication. Cell Metabol. 4, 25 36

    55 Yang, X. et al. (2006) Nuclear receptor expression links the circadianclock to metabolism. Cell 126, 801 810

    56 Chawla, A. and Lazar, M.A. (1993) Induction of Rev-ErbA alpha, anorphan receptor encoded on the opposite strand of the alpha-thyroidhormone receptor gene, during adipocyte differentiation. J. Biol.Chem. 268, 16265 16269

    57 Fontaine, C. et al. (2003) The orphan nuclear receptor Rev-Erbalpha isa peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma targetgene and promotes PPARgamma-induced adipocyte differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 37672 37680

    58 Lau, P. et al. (2008) The orphan nuclear receptor, RORalpha,regulates gene expression that controls lipid metabolism: staggerer(SG/SG) mice are resistant to diet-induced obesity. J. Biol. Chem. 283,18411 18421

    59 Raghuram, S. et al. (2007) Identication of heme as the ligand for theorphan nuclear receptors REV-ERBalpha and REV-ERBbeta. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 1207 1213

    60 Teboul, M. et al. (2009) How nuclear receptors tell time. J. Appl. Physiol. 107, 1965 1971

    61 Balsalobre, A. et al. (2000) Resetting of circadian time in peripheraltissues by glucocorticoid signaling. Science 289, 2344 2347

    62 McNamara, P. et al. (2001) Regulation of CLOCK and MOP4 by nuclear hormone receptors in the vasculature: a humoralmechanism to reset a peripheral clock. Cell 105, 877 889

    63 Gibbs, J.E. et al. (2009)Circadian timingin the lung; a specic role forbronchiolar epithelial cells. Endocrinology 150, 268 276

    64 Lemberger, T. et al. (1996) Expression of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha gene is stimulated by stress and follows adiurnal rhythm. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 1764 1769

    65 Kersten, S. et al. (1999) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor

    alpha mediates the adaptive response to fasting. J. Clin. Invest. 103,1489 1498

    66 Straub, R.H. and Cutolo, M. (2007) Circadian rhythms in rheumatoidarthritis: implications for pathophysiology and therapeuticmanagement. Arthritis Rheum. 56, 399 408

    67 Ferraz, E. et al. (2006) Comparison of 4 AM and 4 PM bronchialresponsiveness to hypertonic saline in asthma. Lung 184, 341 346

    68 Cutolo, M. et al. (2003) Circadian rhythmsin RA. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 62,593 596

    69 Okada, K. et al. (2008) Injection of LPS causes transient suppressionof biological clock genes in rats. J. Surg. Res. 145, 5 12

    70 Murphy, B.A. et al. (2007) Acute systemic inammation transiently synchronizes clock gene expression in equine peripheral blood. Brain Behav. Immun. 21, 467 476

    71 Takahashi, S. et al. (2001) Physical and inammatory stressorselevate circadian clock gene mPer1 mRNA levels in the

    paraventricular nucleus of the mouse. Endocrinology 142, 4910 491772 Liu, J. et al. (2006) Thecircadian clock Period2 gene regulatesgammainterferon production of NK cells in host response tolipopolysaccharide-induced endotoxic shock. Infect. Immun. 74,4750 4756

    73 Guess, J. et al. (2009) Circadian disruption, Per3,and human cytokinesecretion. Integr. Cancer Ther. 8, 329 336

    74 Preuss, F. et al. (2008) Adverse effects of chronic circadiandesynchronization in animals in a challenging environment. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 295, R2034 2040

    75 Hayashi, M. et al. (2007) Characterization of the molecular clock inmouse peritoneal macrophages. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 30, 621 626

    76 Keller, M. et al. (2009) A circadian clock in macrophages controlsinammatory immune responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106,21407 21412

    Review Trends in Pharmacological Sciences Vol.31 No.5

    197

  • 7/24/2019 Circadian Dysfunction

    8/8

    77 Gibbs, J.E. et al. (2009) A role for REV-ERB a in pulmonary inammation. In Congress of the European Biological Rhythms Society , S14 14

    78 Shen, Z. et al. (2009) Role of SIRT1 in regulation of LPS- or twoethanol metabolites-induced TNF-alpha production in culturedmacrophage cell lines. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.296, G1047 1053

    79 Delayre-Orthez, C. et al. (2005) PPARalpha downregulates airway inammation induced by lipopolysaccharide in the mouse. Respir. Res. 6, 91

    80 Stapleton, C.M. et al. (2005) Enhanced susceptibility of staggerer(RORalphasg/sg) mice to lipopolysaccharide-induced lung inammation. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 289, L144 152

    81 Jaradat, M. et al. (2006) Modulatory role for retinoid-related orphanreceptor alpha in allergen-induced lung inammation. Am. J. Respir.Crit. Care Med. 174, 1299 1309

    82 Birrell, M.A. et al. (2004) PPAR-gamma agonists as therapy fordiseases involving airway neutrophilia. Eur. Respir. J. 24, 18 23

    83 Fontaine, C. et al. (2008) The nuclear receptor Rev-erbalpha is a liver X receptor (LXR) target gene driving a negative feedback loop onselect LXR-induced pathways in human macrophages. Mol. Endocrinol. 22, 1797 1811

    84 Delerive, P. et al. (2001) The orphan nuclear receptor ROR alpha is anegative regulator of the inammatoryresponse. EMBO Rep. 2,42 48

    85 Zhang-Gandhi, C.X. and Drew, P.D. (2007) Liver X receptor andretinoid X receptor agonists inhibit inammatory responses of

    microglia and astrocytes. J. Neuroimmunol. 183, 50 5986 Migita, H. et al. (2004) Rev-erbalpha upregulates NF-kappaB-

    responsive genes in vascular smooth muscle cells. FEBS Lett. 561,69 74

    87 Gallou-Kabani, C. et al. (2007) Lifelong circadian and epigenetic driftsin metabolic syndrome. Epigenetics 2, 137 146

    88 Karlsson, B. et al. (2001) Is there an association between shift work and having a metabolic syndrome? Results from a population basedstudy of 27,485 people. Occup. Environ. Med. 58, 747 752

    89 Chaput, J.P. et al. (2006) Relationship between short sleeping hoursand childhood overweight/obesity: results from the Quebec en FormeProject. Int. J. Obesity 30, 1080 1085

    90 Gangwisch, J.E. et al. (2005) Inadequate sleep as a risk factor forobesity: analyses of the NHANES I. Sleep 28, 1289 1296

    91 Bechtold, D.A. (2008) Energy-responsive timekeeping. J. Genet. 87,447 458

    92 Laposky, A.D. et al. (2008) Sleep and circadian rhythms: key components in the regulation of energy metabolism. FEBS Lett.582, 142 151

    93 Ramsey, K.M. et al. (2007) The clockwork of metabolism. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 27, 219 240

    94 Kohsaka, A. and Bass, J. (2007) A sense of time: how molecular clocksorganize metabolism. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 18, 4 11

    95 Wijnen, H. and Young, M.W. (2006) Interplay of circadian clocks andmetabolic rhythms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 40, 409 448

    96 Kaasik, K. and Lee, C.C. (2004) Reciprocal regulation of haembiosynthesis and the circadian clock in mammals. Nature 430, 467 471

    97 Rutter, J. et al. (2002) Metabolism and the control of circadianrhythms. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71, 307 331

    98 Tu, B.P. and McKnight, S.L. (2006) Metabolic cycles as an underlying basis of biological oscillations. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 696 701

    99 Dufeld, G.E. et al. (2002) Circadian programs of transcriptionalactivation, signaling, and protein turnover revealed by microarray analysis of mammalian cells. Curr. Biol. 12, 551 557

    100 Kornmann, B. et al. (2007) Regulation of circadian gene expression inliver by systemic signals and hepatocyte oscillators. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant Biol. 72, 319 330

    101 Walker, J.R. and Hogenesch, J.B. (2005) RNA proling in circadianbiology. Meth. Enzymol. 393, 366 376

    102 Spiegel, K. et al. (2009) Effects of poor and short sleep on glucosemetabolism and obesity risk. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 5, 253 261

    103 Turek, F.W. et al. (2005) Obesity and metabolic syndrome in circadianClock mutant mice. Science 308, 1043 1045

    104 Bechtold, D.A. et al. (2008) Metabolic rhythm abnormalities in micelacking VIP-VPAC2 signaling. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 294, R344 351

    105 Oishi, K. et al. (2006) Disrupted fat absorption attenuates obesity induced by a high-fat diet in Clock mutant mice. FEBS Lett. 580,127 130

    106 Kudo, T. et al. (2008) Clock mutation facilitates accumulation of cholesterol in the liver of mice fed a cholesterol and/or cholic aciddiet. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 294, E120 130

    107 Mistlberger, R.E. (1994) Circadian food-anticipatory activity: formalmodels and physiological mechanisms. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 18,171 195

    108 Stephan, F.K. (2002) The other circadian system: food as aZeitgeber. J. Biol. Rhythms 17, 284 292

    109 Stokkan, K.A. et al. (2001) Entrainment of the circadian clock in theliver by feeding. Science 291, 490 493

    110 Scheer, F.A. et al. (2009) Adverse metabolic and cardiovascularconsequences of circadian misalignment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.U. S. A. 106, 4453 4458

    111 LeSauter, J. et al. (2009) Stomach ghrelin-secreting cells as food-entrainable circadian clocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106,13582 13587

    112 Rutter, J. et al. (2001)Regulation of clock andNPAS2 DNAbinding by the redox state of NAD cofactors. Science 293, 510 514

    113 Sauve, A.A. et al. (2006) The biochemistry of sirtuins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 75, 435 465

    114 Hirota, T. et al. (2002) Glucose down-regulates Per1 and Per2 mRNA levels and induces circadian gene expression in cultured Rat-1broblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 44244 44251

    115 Leone, T.C. et al. (2005) PGC-1alpha deciency causes multi-systemenergy metabolic derangements: muscle dysfunction, abnormalweight control and hepatic steatosis. PLoS Biol. 3, e101

    116 Lin, J. et al. (2005) Metabolic control through the PGC-1 family of transcription coactivators. Cell Metab. 1, 361 370

    117 Liu, C. et al. (2007) Transcriptional coactivator PGC-1alpha integratesthe mammalian clock and energy metabolism. Nature 447, 477 481

    118 Pillarisetti, S. (2008) A review of Sirt1 and Sirt1 modulators incardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Rec. Pat. Cardiovasc. Drug Disc. 3, 156 164

    119 Lowrey, P.L. and Takahashi, J.S. (2004) Mammalian circadianbiology: elucidating genome-wide levels of temporal organization. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 5, 407 441

    120 Gallego, M. et al. (2006) An opposite role for tau in circadian rhythmsrevealed by mathematical modeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.103, 10618 10623

    121 Meng, Q.J. et al. (2008)Setting clock speed in mammals: the CK1 e taumutation in mice accelerates the circadian pacemaker by selectively destabilizing PERIOD proteins. Neuron 58, 78 88

    122 Sack, R.L. et al. (2007) Circadian rhythm sleep disorders: part II,advanced sleep phase disorder, delayed sleep phase disorder, free-running disorder, and irregular sleep-wake rhythm. An American Academy of Sleep Medicine review. Sleep 30, 1484 1501

    123 Jones, C.R. et al. (1999) Familial advanced sleep-phase syndrome: A short-period circadian rhythm variant in humans. Nat. Med. 5, 1062 1065

    124 Reid,K.J. et al. (2001) Familial advanced sleepphase syndrome. Arch. Neurol. 58, 1089 1094

    125 Toh, K.L. et al. (2001) An hPer2 phosphorylation site mutation infamilial advanced sleep phase syndrome. Science 291, 1040 1043

    126 Xu, Y. et al. (2005) Functional consequences of a CKIdelta mutationcausing familialadvancedsleep phase syndrome. Nature 434,640 644

    127 Vanselow, K. et al. (2006) Differential effects of PER2phosphorylation: molecular basis for the human familial advancedsleep phase syndrome (FASPS). Genes Dev. 20, 2660 2672

    128 Xu, Y. et al. (2007) Modeling of a human circadian mutation yieldsinsights into clock regulation by PER2. Cell 128, 59 70

    129 Ralph, M.R. and Menaker, M. (1988) A mutation of the circadiansystem in golden hamsters. Science 241, 1225 1227

    130 Loudon, A.S. et al. (2007) The biology of the circadian Ck1epsilon taumutation in mice and Syrian hamsters: a tale of two species. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant Biol. 72, 261 271

    131 Etchegaray, J.P. et al. (2009) Casein kinase 1 delta regulates the paceof the mammalian circadian clock. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 3853 3866

    132 Walton, K.M. (2009) Selective inhibition of casein kinase 1 epsilonminimally alters circadian clock period. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 330,430 439

    Review Trends in Pharmacological Sciences Vol.31 No.5

    198