CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

24
Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval 1 CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks F. Capizzano, P. Catalano , A. Carozza, D. Cinquegrana, F. Petrosino CIRA – Centro Italiano Ricerche Aerospaziali e-mail: [email protected] 1 st AIAA Ice Prediction Workshop Workshop in Conjunction with the AIAA AVIATION 2021 Forum All Virtual/Remote Participation 26-29 July 2021

Transcript of CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Page 1: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval 1

CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

F. Capizzano, P. Catalano , A. Carozza, D. Cinquegrana, F. Petrosino

CIRA – Centro Italiano Ricerche Aerospazialie-mail: [email protected]

1st AIAA Ice Prediction WorkshopWorkshop in Conjunction with the AIAA AVIATION 2021 Forum

All Virtual/Remote Participation26-29 July 2021

Page 2: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval

Motivations

CIRA solvers

Ice-accretion chain

Specific findings and conclusions

Future works

OUTLINE

Page 3: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval

Challenge: the numerical prediction of in-flight ice accretion is becoming a valid mean to demonstrate the compliance with certification rules

Physics: ice accretion is a time-dependent multi-disciplinary field (aerodynamic, thermodynamic, multi-phase flow, geometry handling)

Expertise: CIRA has a solid background in icing, both numerically (MULTICE, ZEN-IMP3D, SIMBA-ICE, OpenFoam) and experimentally (IWT facility). Participation in EU-funded projects ICE-GENESIS (SLD) and MUSIC-HAIC (Ice-Cristals).

Goal: coupling different methodologies to exploit their respective benefits towards the fully automatic prediction of the ice accretion process

MOTIVATIONS

Page 4: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval

Method Data manag. Turbulent Droplet Thermodynamic Surface deformation

SIMBA-ICEIB-RANS

3D Finite-VolumeFully Unstruct. k-w TNT Eulerian Messinger Multistep

Dynamic-IB

MultiIcePotential-BL

2D Finite Diff.Structured - Lagrangian Messinger Multistep

Lagrangian

ZEN-IMP3DRANS

3D Finite VolumeMulti-Block Structured k-w TNT Eulerian - Multistep

Lagrangian

OpenFoamRANS

3D Finite-VolumeOctree k-w SST Lagrangian - -

MESS3DSurface

Finite VolumeFully Unstruct. - - Messinger Multistep

Lagrangian

CIRA NUMERICAL CAPABILITIES

Page 5: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval

Air and water phases

FV method, 2nd order skew-symmetric CDS scheme

Green-Gauss cell-center gradient reconstruction

Implicit 2nd order time-accurate integration

Standard k-ω TNT and Kalitzin k-g turbulence models

Wall modelling for medimum/high Reynolds number flows

Hybrid RANS-LES method: eXtra Large-Eddy Simulation

(X-LES) proposed by J.C. Kok.

( )TEwvu ρωρκρρρρρ ,,,,,,=Q( )Twvu αααα ,,,=Q

SIMBA FRAMEWORK

Mesh generation

CAD direct input (e.g. STL-format)

Can treat multi-body configurations

Unstructured data management

Anisotropic refinements

Cell tagging using a ray-tracing technique

Buffer Layers

Window refinement

Interface with the flow solver for adaptive refinements

based on the flow-field solution

Page 6: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval

Software package for evaluating ice-accretion on 2D airfoils

Panel method for the air-phase or imported by a CFD external solver

Lagrangian approach for evaluating droplet trajectories

Ice-accretion is computed by using the classical Messinger model.

Different approaches are available: predictor, predictor-corrector or multi-step.

MULTI-ICE FRAMEWORK

Page 7: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval

Aerodynamics by in-house ZEN code

Structured multi-block flow solver for EULER-RANS-

URANS equations

Finite-Volume, cell-centered

Jameson-like scheme

Dual-time stepping for time-accurate simulations

Several turbulence models

TNT κ-omega applied

Impingment by in-house IMP3D code

Eulerian method

Drag, gravity and buoyancy terms in momentum

equations

Pressure and viscous terms neglected for particle

phase

Finite-Volume, cell-centered

Same grid as aerodynamics

( )TEwvu ρωρκρρρρρ ,,,,,,=Q

( )Twvu αααα ,,,=Q

ZEN-IMP3D FRAMEWORK

Hybrid RANS-LES: Confluence of wake and bundary layerDrag-reduction devices

Page 8: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval

• OpenFOAM is free and open source framework

• OpenFOAM includes solvers for any application, including particles (Eulerian or Lagrangian approach)

• Capability to customize solvers and applications

• 2D and 3D geometries

OPENFOAM FRAMEWORK

Page 9: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval

I/O interface

MESS3D FRAMEWORK

ZEN flow IMP3D drop

SIMBA flow SIMBA dropMESS3D

Unstructured Advanced Messinger model for mixed phase accretion

Input converted in unstructured-data format for MESS3D (if needed)

Iterative Messinger model distributes runback-out flow based on surface skinfriction/Euler velocities

HTC computed internally in the MESS3D code

Grid vertices deformations by averaging neighbors freezing-cells’ thickness

Strucured data stream

Unstrucured data stream

Page 10: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval

Aerodynamic flow field on clean geometry

Ice accretion modelling

Modified geometry

t=tfin

noyes

stop

Eulerian / Lagrangian approach

IB / Body fittedapproach

Aerodynamic flow field on iced geometry

Water impingement evaluation

Multilayer PDEs Mass, thermal balance - Messinger model

ICE ACCRETION CHAIN

Page 11: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval

11

GLAZE-ICEMVD = 20 µmLWC = 0.55 g/m3

Tp = 265.37°KSpray time = 7 min.Nsteps= 10

M = 0.33Re = 5.10*106

α = 3.5°c = 0.5334 m

NACA0012 NASA- RUN401

air-phase

air-phase

water-phaseice-accr.

mesh adapt.

water-phase

SIMBA-ICE: VALIDATING MULTI-STEP ACCRETION

Page 12: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval

Free-streamM = 0.23Re = 5.03*106

α = 6°T = 291.2 °KPstatic = 83025 Pa

y/b = 0.5 y/b = 0.9

Note: wing placed in WT with AOA applied and slip-BCs at side-walls

SIMBA-ICE: CASES 111 AND 112

NACA 64A008 HTAIL

Page 13: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval

Free-streamM = 0.23Re = 5.03*106

α = 6°T = 291.2 °KPstatic = 83025 Pa

Note: wing placed in WT with AOA applied and slip-BCs at side-walls

CASES 111 AND 112

Case-111: MVD=21µm Case-112: MVD=92µm

NACA 64A008 HTAIL

No SLD modelling!

SIMBA OpenFoam

Page 14: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval

Free-streamM = 0.23Re = 4.9*106

α = 4°T = 291.2 °KPstatic = 84850 Pa

Slat

air-phase water-phase water-phase

Note: far-field domain-boundarieswith free-stream AOA

CASES 121 AND 122

Page 15: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval

CASES 121 AND 122

Slat Main FlapCase-121: MVD=21µm

Slat Main FlapCase-112: MVD=92µm

No SLD modelling!

Page 16: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval

CASE-241 (rime)M = 0.35Re = 3.8*106

α = 2°MVD = 30 µmT = 250.15 °KPstatic = 92528 PaLWC = 0.42 g/m3

Spray time = 5 min.

SIMBA-ICE: CASE-241

Page 17: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval

CASE-242 (glaze)M = 0.31Re = 3.4*106

α = 2°MVD = 30 µmT = 266.05 °KPstatic = 92941 PaLWC = 0.81 g/m3

Spray time = 5 min.Nsteps= 10

air-phase water-phase

air-phase

SIMBA-ICE: CASE-242

Page 18: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval

18 in NACA 23012 - Test case n. 242 MultiIce (Panel/Lagrangian)

MULTI-ICE: CASE-242

Page 19: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval

72 in NACA 23012 - Test case n. 252 MultiIce (Panel/Lagrangian)

MULTI-ICE: CASE-252

Page 20: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval

CASE-361 (rime)M = 0.32Re = 7.2*106

α = 0°MVD = 34.7 µmT = 257 °KPstatic = 92321 PaLWC = 0.50 g/m3

Spray time = 20 min.

Note: wing placed into WT with slip-BCs at side-walls

SIMBA-ICE: CASE-361

Page 21: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval

CASE-361 (rime)M = 0.32Re = 7.2*106

α = 0°MVD = 34.7 µmT = 257 °KPstatic = 92321 PaLWC = 0.50 g/m3

Spray time = 20 min.

SIMBA-ICE AND ZEN-IMP3D-MESS3D: CASE-361

One-shot ice-accretion

Page 22: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval Date

In general, the finite-volume Eulerian solvers SIMBA-ICE and ZEN-IMP3Dproved superior to the Lagrangian Multi-Ice and OpenFoam solvers when appliedto compute water droplet impingement for the IPW benchmarks.

Roughness, convective heat transfer, runback, water film formation, etc. have keyroles for the “glaze-ice” accretion (e.g. the NACA23012 case-241).

On the whole, the developed multi-step FV methods could be good candidates forfuture developments towards complete 3D ice-accretion estimation.

The flexible treatment of Cartesian meshing around complex geometries, likethose encountered in icing, makes the IB-method particularly attractive.

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

Page 23: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval Date

CIRA is developing a multi-step and multiphase approach for ice-accretion:

• Remeshing technique for the multi-block structured solver ZEN-IMP3D.

• Remeshing/refining technique for the IB-solver SIMBA.

In parallel, CIRA is developing an ice-accretion method based on a modifiedMessinger 3D model.

CIRA is implementing new/improved SLD models into the in-house Eulerian 2D and 3D solvers.

FUTURE WORKS

Page 24: CIRA icing codes and findings for the IPW benchmarks

Use or disclosure of the information contained herein is subject to specific written CIRA approval 24

Questions