CHI 2009 Highlights

81
CHI 2009 Highlights August 2009
  • Upload

    frog
  • Category

    Design

  • view

    2.405
  • download

    2

description

 

Transcript of CHI 2009 Highlights

Page 1: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI 2009 Highlights

August 2009

Page 2: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 2

Introduction

Research1. Jan Chipchase Talk2. Engagement by Design Workshop

Design3. Student Design Competition 4. One Armed Bandits Talk

Theory5. Beauty Dilemma Panel6. Theory of Aesthetics

Summary

Table of Contents

Page 3: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 3

What is CHI?

The ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) series of academic conferences is generally considered the most prestigious in the field of hu-man-computer interaction. It is hosted by ACM SIGCHI, the Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction. CHI has been held annually since 1982 and attracts thousands of international attendees.

The conference consists of multiple tracks, including:

• Case studies• Posters, notes, and academic papers on a variety of topics (ubiquitous computing, visualization, usability and user experience design, etc.)• Workshops hosted by domain experts• Invited panels on relevant topics

The number of accepted full papers is slowly increasing and reached 157 accepted papers with an acceptance rate of 22 percent in 2008

Introduction

Page 4: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 4

Goals

- Share what CHI is like- Discuss how the role of design at CHI is evolving and how frog is influencing it- Learn insights from the work presented

Introduction

Page 5: CHI 2009 Highlights

5

1. JAN CHIPCHASE TALK

Page 6: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 6

Robert FabricantDesign Chair

Page 7: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 7

Jan ChipchaseNokia

Page 8: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 8

Page 9: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 9

Page 10: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 10

Page 11: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 11

Page 12: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 12

Page 13: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 13

Page 14: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 14

Page 15: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 15

Findings- Waking up with the city (research team up at 4AM)- Reading signs and obituaries reveal cultural values- Researching in the context of poverty provides extreme use cases- Having local interpreters for the culture facilitates understanding

Process- CHI is evolving their “Design Track”- CHI is adding more invited, inspirational speakers

Jan Chipchase Summary

Page 16: CHI 2009 Highlights

16

2. ENGAGEMENT BY DESIGN WORKSHOP

Page 17: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 17

Engagement by DesignWorkshop

Page 18: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 18

Page 19: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 19

Page 20: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 20

Page 21: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 21

Page 22: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 22

Page 23: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 23

Page 24: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 24

Page 25: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 25

Page 26: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 26

Page 27: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 27

Page 28: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 28

Page 29: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 29

Page 30: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 30

Page 31: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 31

Page 32: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 32

Page 33: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 33

Findings- Tracking in itself is a useful part of lifestyle change (diabetes)- Rewards need to be aligned with growth of the system (gaming, social networks)- Playability is more important than usability in gaming- Trans-Theoretical Model for Treatment common reference point (cancer)- Archetype model received well (self-selecting states, modes of downshifting)- Relationship model for system usage over time (all)

Process- 12 authors with point of view on Engagement by Design- 10 minute presentations each- Breakout sessions - Present back to the group- Discussing publishing an issue of Interactions Magazine

Engagement by Design Summary

Page 34: CHI 2009 Highlights

34

3. STUDENT DESIGN COMPETITION

Page 35: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 35

Jon KolkoStudent Design Competition

Page 36: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 36

Page 37: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 37

Page 38: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 38

Page 39: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 39

Page 40: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 40

Page 41: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 41

Page 42: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 42

Process- frog is involving design more in the CHI community- The student competition is a way to integrate practice with academics (frog, Smart Design on the panel)- This is a transparent example of the process- Started with 125 papers, selected 10 for a poster session, then selected 4 for the presentation with the top three selected for first, second, third place.

Student Design Competition Summary

Page 43: CHI 2009 Highlights

43

4. ONE ARMED BANDIT TALK

Page 44: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 44

Page 45: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 45

Page 46: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 46

Page 47: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 47

Page 48: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 48

Page 49: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 49

Finding- Archetypes well received as an alternative to Personas.

Process- Example of how a design project at frog can be published- Lots questioning - what is “successful” design?- Awards as recognition (e.g., IDSA Gold Award) doesn’t translate well to CHI- As consultants, we face the challenge of “knowing” how our designs progress unless we do a follow-up project, win an award, - To publish “archetypes” as a framework, we would probably need to have 3-5 projects as supporting evidence.

One-Armed Bandit Summary

Page 50: CHI 2009 Highlights

50

5. BEAUTY DILEMMA PANEL

Page 51: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 51

The “Beauty Dilemma” Panel

Page 52: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 52

Bill BuxtonMicrosoft Research

Page 53: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 53

Page 54: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 54

Page 55: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 55

Page 56: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 56

Page 57: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 57

Page 58: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 58

Jodi FolizziCarnegie Mellon

Page 59: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 59

Page 60: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 60

Page 61: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 61

Page 62: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 62

Page 63: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 63

Findings- In this context, “beauty” is confused between styling and design - Beauty is culturally defined- Beauty is difficult to quantify - Empirical study can’t describe successful design- A study based on hypothetical trade-offs doesn’t really answer the right questions

Process- Main paper was distributed to 3 panelists- Each panelist was asked to critique the paper in a 10 min presentation- Provided a good discussion, and contextualized the findings

Beauty Panel Summary

Page 64: CHI 2009 Highlights

64

6. THEORY OF AESTHETICS

Page 65: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 65

Page 66: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 66

Page 67: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 67

Page 68: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 68

Page 69: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 69

Page 70: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 70

Page 71: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 71

Page 72: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 72

Page 73: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 73

Page 74: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 74

Page 75: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 75

Page 76: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 76

Findings- Defining CHI’s approach to aesthetics has a long way to go (as compared to film theory, etc)- Cultivating expert judgement is perhaps the best approach- Doing lots of critiques is the best way to develop these skills- “Implications for Design” as part of the submission process should clearly delineate if it is relevant to this design or the practice of Design

Process- Discussion evolved out of the alt.CHI forum- Material was iterated on over several conferences- Has helped influence the requirement for future

Theory of Aesthetics Summary

Page 77: CHI 2009 Highlights

77

SUMMARY

Page 78: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 78

Impressions- Change is slow, but the Design Track and connection to CHI are evolving- Framing our work in the context of conferences help validate and contextualize our work- Submitting Design work will be easier and clearer in upcoming years- Conferences such as SXSW or IxDA are less academic alternatives

Next year

- 2010’s theme: encouraging people to take a walk.- CHI will be in Atlanta, April 10th- Requirements are changing - Have Expert, Invited, and Juried talks- The Design Track is advancing

Summary

Page 79: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 79

For more information:

CHI- http://www.chi2009.org/

Engagement by Design- http://ebd.wikispaces.com/

Jan Chipchase- http://www.janchipchase.com/

Interactions Magazine- http://interactions.acm.org/

Papers and presentation\\Frogsf-file\SV-Users\Celine Pering\CHI 2009 papers and frog internal meeting

Summary

Page 80: CHI 2009 Highlights
Page 81: CHI 2009 Highlights

CHI Highlights from CHI 2009 © 2009 frog design. confidential & proprietary August 12, 2009 81

Interactive Photo Viewers: Another group from Japan showed off sandwich-size, turtle-shaped “CaraClocks”--devices that sync when they touch to show related photos. For example, a father, mother, and child could connect their CaraClocks, turn a knob, and see pictures of one another at the same age.

The researchers behind the project, from Keio University, say that this can evoke what they call “collective memory.” They also say that CaraClocks can generate various visual parallels between users by