Chapter 7 review
Transcript of Chapter 7 review
![Page 1: Chapter 7 review](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082702/55516ec5b4c9057e458b486c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 7
Blowing the Whistle
McGraw-Hill
![Page 2: Chapter 7 review](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082702/55516ec5b4c9057e458b486c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.7-2 Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
7-2
“The word whistleblower suggests that you’re a tattletale or that you’re somehow disloyal… But I wasn’t disloyal in the least bit. People were dying. I was loyal to a higher order of ethical responsibility.”
Dr. Jeffrey Wigand, ‘The Insider’
![Page 3: Chapter 7 review](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082702/55516ec5b4c9057e458b486c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.7-3 Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
What is Whistle-Blowing?Whistleblower
– An employee who discovers corporate misconduct and chooses to bring it to the attention of others.
Internal Whistle-blowing– When an employee discovers corporate misconduct and
brings it to the attention of his supervisor, who then follows established procedures to address the misconduct within the organization.
External Whistle-blowing– When an employee discovers corporate misconduct and
chooses to bring it to the attention of law enforcement agencies and/or the media.
7-3
![Page 4: Chapter 7 review](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082702/55516ec5b4c9057e458b486c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.7-4 Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
When is Whistle-Blowing Ethical?Ethical whistle-blowing must meet 5 conditions:1. When the company, through a product or decision, will cause serious and
considerable harm to the public (as consumers or bystanders), or break existing laws, the employee should report the organization.
2. When the employee identifies a serious threat of harm, he or she should report it and state his or her moral concern.
3. When the employee’s immediate supervisor does not act, the employee should exhaust the internal procedures and chain of command to the board of directors.
4. The employee must have documented evidence that is convincing to a reasonable, impartial observer that his or her view of the situation is accurate, and evidence that the firm’s practice, product or policy seriously threatens and puts in danger the public or product user.
5. The employee must have valid reasons to believe that revealing the wrongdoing to the public will result in the changes necessary to remedy the situation.
7-4
![Page 5: Chapter 7 review](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082702/55516ec5b4c9057e458b486c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.7-5 Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
When is Whistle-Blowing Unethical?
• Whistle-blowing must be questioned if:– Motivation is the opportunity for financial
gain or media attention– Employee is carrying out a vendetta against
the company• Key point – better be very sure of your
facts and your evidence better be irrefutable before blowing the whistle
7-5
![Page 6: Chapter 7 review](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082702/55516ec5b4c9057e458b486c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.7-6 Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Qui Tam Lawsuits
• A lawsuit brought on behalf of the federal government by a whistle-blower under the False Claims Act of 1863
7-6
![Page 7: Chapter 7 review](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082702/55516ec5b4c9057e458b486c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.7-7 Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Year of the Whistle-Blower 2002
Sherron Watkins – Vice President of Enron Coleen Rowley – FBI Staff AttorneyCynthia Cooper – Internal Auditor at
WorldCom
7-7
![Page 8: Chapter 7 review](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082702/55516ec5b4c9057e458b486c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.7-8 Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Duty to Respond• Prior to 2002 – legal protection for whistle-blowers
existed only through legislation that encouraged the moral behavior of employees who felt themselves compelled to speak out, without offering any safe-guards against retaliation
• The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989:– Addressed the issue of retaliation against federal
employees
7-8
![Page 9: Chapter 7 review](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082702/55516ec5b4c9057e458b486c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.7-9 Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Whistleblower Protection Act
• Imposed specific processing deadlines of complaints
• Guaranteed anonymity of the whistle-blower
• Required prompt payment of any portion of the settlement entitled to the whistle-blower
7-9
![Page 10: Chapter 7 review](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082702/55516ec5b4c9057e458b486c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.7-10 Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Duty to Respond
• Employees who prevail in whistle-blowing cases are entitled to damages, which may include:– Reinstatement to the same seniority status– Back pay– Interest– All compensatory damages to make the
employee whole– “Special damages”
7-10
![Page 11: Chapter 7 review](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082702/55516ec5b4c9057e458b486c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.7-11 Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Duty to Respond
• Mechanisms that employers need to put in place:– A well-defined process to document how
such complaints are handled– An employee hotline to file such complaints– A prompt and thorough investigation of all
complaints– A detailed report of all investigations
7-11
![Page 12: Chapter 7 review](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082702/55516ec5b4c9057e458b486c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.7-12 Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Whistle Blowing As a Last Resort
• Becoming a whistle-blower and taking a story public should be last resort
• After blowing the whistle on fraud:– 90 percent were fired or demoted– 27 percent faced lawsuits– 26 percent had to seek psychiatric or
physical care– 25 percent suffered alcohol abuse
7-12
![Page 13: Chapter 7 review](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082702/55516ec5b4c9057e458b486c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.7-13 Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Whistle Blowing As a Last Resort
– 17 percent lost their homes– 15 percent got divorced– 10 percent attempted suicide– 8 percent were bankrupted
7-13