Matching circuit optimization for antenna applications - CST
CellMax Optimization Antenna
-
Upload
wonghongwei -
Category
Documents
-
view
262 -
download
2
Transcript of CellMax Optimization Antenna
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
1/42
OPTIMIZE AND REDUCE YOUR NETWORK INVESTMENTOPTIMIZE AND REDUCE YOUR NETWORK INVESTMENT
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
2/42
COMPANYCOMPANY-- BackgroundBackground
Founded: 2001
Management: Extensive experience from suppliersEricsson, Nokia, Lucent, MSI, Allgon,LGP and Powerwave
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
3/42
COMPANYCOMPANY-- FacilitiesFacilities
HQ, Tby
Visby
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
4/42
COMPANYCOMPANY-- Antenna ProductsAntenna Products
Main Drivers are:
To deliver the cheapest dBs on the market High efficiency Green power
Performance
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
5/42
COMPANYCOMPANY-- Technology AdvantageTechnology Advantage
Gain (dBi) Vs Horizontal Beamwidth
Main Antenna Manufacturers
CellMax24
25
33 degree 65 degree
CellMax2122
1819
15
16HorizontalBeam width
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
(Degrees)
Source: InCode Wireless / VeriSign
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
6/42
COMPANYCOMPANY-- Antenna ProductsAntenna Products
Extremely Efficient Broad Band feedingnetwork Technology;
High performing Negligible losses, (WYSIWG)
Minimal soldering No cables
,Front to Back ratio and superior orthogonality
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
7/42
COMPANYCOMPANY-- Antenna ProductsAntenna Products
High gain with full beam shaping n enna pa ern exce ence Antenna null fill control Upper side lobe suppression
High Gain stability Gain tracking Beam width control over frequency Tuning free production Gain efficiency versus size
No in roduction or ost roduction tunin 100% reproducibility
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
8/42
Wh Hi h Effi i ?hy High Efficiency ?
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
9/42
WHY HIGH EFFICENCY?WHY HIGH EFFICENCY? -- Gain EvolutionGain Evolution
NMT AMPS/GSM GSM/PCS3G
WiMax
z
System
12 12 12 12 12
15 1518
1518
1518
1518
dBi
21
24
21
24>24
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
10/42
WHY HIGH EFFICENCY?WHY HIGH EFFICENCY? Increased EIRPIncreased EIRP
Standard 18 dBi Antenna CellMax 21dBi Antenna
Coverage Increase up to 40%
BTS reduction up to 30%
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
11/42
ANTENNAANTENNA Nice Site ReductionNice Site Reduction
47 Standard 18 dBi Antenna sites 37 CellMax 21dBi Antenna sites
re ct ons y
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
12/42
ANTENNAANTENNA Brussels Site ReductionBrussels Site Reduction
66 Standard 18 dBi Antenna sites 50 CellMax 21dBi Antenna sites
overage pro a y ncrease
signifficantly with 24% fewer sites
re c ons y
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
13/42
WHY HIGH EFFICENCY?WHY HIGH EFFICENCY? Market driversMarket drivers
CAPEX and OPEX reductions main drivers for operators
3G demand all available power to support high bandwidthservices
Swiftest and most cost effective means of optimization andquality improvement
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
14/42
Wh C llM ?hy CellMax?
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
15/42
MissionMission -- To increase data rate and coverageTo increase data rate and coverage
100MMore upp/down link power,(higher C/N & C/I)LTE/
WiMax
10M
HSPA
Data rate is NOT limited by technology,
but by received power / interference ratio
100k
UMTS
10K
Indoor local Wide area
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
16/42
GSM PCS UMTSWhyWhy CellMaxCellMax?? EfficiencyEfficiency ComparisonComparison (2m)(2m)
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
17/42
Why CellMax?Why CellMax? Conventional Feed networConventional Feed networ
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
18/42
Why CellMax?Why CellMax? Conventional DipolesConventional Dipoles
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
19/42
Why CellMax?Why CellMax? Received SS ComparisonReceived SS ComparisonCellMax 21dBi 4 deg vs. Typical 18dBi 2 deg, Sub UrbanCellMax 21dBi 4 deg vs. Typical 18dBi 2 deg, Sub Urban
5 dB stronger level of null-fill
Same rangeReduced
Improved QoS
Design Criteria
Serving Cell
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
20/42
Before AfterWhy CellMax?Why CellMax? Traffic Increase (rural)Traffic Increase (rural)
Higher Signal Strength
17 Erl.
Fewer dropped calls
Im roved Call Set u11 Erl.
Increase in Traffic
10-50%54% increase
Rural, Sub-urban & Urban
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
21/42
Why CellMax?Why CellMax? Traffic Increase (subTraffic Increase (sub--urban)urban)
Cellmax average
417 E
30% increase
Kathrein average
Antenna
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
22/42
Why CellMax?Why CellMax? -- Increased 3G ThroughputIncreased 3G Throughput
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
23/42
7.5 km
11 km
+47% range increase
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
24/42
The nodeB subject to the change
antenna is indicated in figure
with one arrow. Configuration RF
has not been changed in the
period considered for the tests
(weeks 49 and 50)
Sctors CPICH Qqualmin
-
48912 33 dBm -22 dB
48913 34 dBm -22 dB48914 35 dBm -22 dB
48915 34 dBm -22 dB
-
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
25/42
Why CellMax?Why CellMax? -- Increased 3G Throughput contIncreased 3G Throughput cont
Without CELLMAX antenna With CELLMAX antenna
WEEK 49
Service Traffic [milliErlang]
WEEK 50
Service Traffic [milliErlang]
VOICE 2625355
VIDEO 131705
PS @ 64 649931
PS@ 128 64524
VOICE 3585491
VIDEO 192406
PS @ 64 939897
PS @ 128 117412
PS@ 384 32541 PS @ 384 62897
Performance
Cell MAX
VOICE +36.6%
VIDEO +46.1%
PS @ 64K +44.6%
.
PS @ 384K +93.3%
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
26/42
100,0
COST SAVINGCOST SAVING-- Antenna pos. on MastAntenna pos. on Mast
70,0
80,0
90,0
ters
50,0
60,0
21 dBieightinM
30,0
40,018 dBi
MastH
10,0
20,0
,
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 35
Measured at Distance from site
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
27/42
Freq. Band: 1710 - 2170 MHzANTENNAANTENNA -- CMACMA--B/6521B/6521
Gain [dBi]: 20.4 / 20.7 / 21.2 HBW: 66.0o / 65.0o / 63.5o VBW: 4.6o / 4.2o / 3.9o VSWR: < 1.5:1 Isolation: >30dBsolation: >30dB F/B: >25dB USLS: >18dB 1st Null Fill: 20dB (10dB 60o LxWxD (mm): 2060 x 196 x 92
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
28/42
ANTENNAANTENNA Vertical PatternVertical Pattern1st Upper Sidelobe
Su ression
Nullfill
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
29/42
ANTENNAANTENNA Received SS ComparisonReceived SS Comparison
First Null >30 dB stronger
5 % ran e increase
Design Criteria
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
30/42
Freq. Band: 1710 - 2170 MHzANTENNAANTENNA -- CMACMA--B/3324B/3324
Gain [dBi]: 23.2 / 23.6 / 24.0 HBW: 35o / 33o / 31o
VBW 4 6o / 4 2o / 3 9o VBW: 4.6o / 4.2o / 3.9o VSWR: < 1.5:1 Isolation: >30dBsolation: 30dB F/B: >30dB USLS: >18dB 1st Null Fill: 20dB (10dB 30o)
L W D ( ) 2070 288 128 LxWxD (mm): 2070 x 288 x 128
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
31/42
ANTENNAANTENNA Cellmax 6Cellmax 6--sector solutionsector solution
Cellmax24dBi,33deghighgainantenna
GSM900MHzoverlaywithsameUMTSsitelocations
+6dBstoatraditional18dBi
linkbudgetTheoretically2.7timesthecoverageromas an ar sec ors emeans
practicalsitesavingsof60%
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
32/42
CellMaxCellMax testtest facilitiesfacilities-- SAAB AerospaceSAAB Aerospace
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
33/42
CellMaxCellMax testtest facilitiesfacilities-- AerotechTelubAerotechTelub
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
34/42
Environmental TestingEnvironmental Testing
Specification of Environmental Tests for TelecommunicationsEquipment: ETSI 300 019-2-4: Class T4-1E
Non-weather protected locations Extended. ETSI 300 019-2-1: Class T1.2
Weather protected locations - not temperature controlled. ETSI 300 019-2-2: Class T2.2
Careful trans ortation.
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
35/42
Environmental TestsEnvironmental Tests
IEC68-2-1 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Tests Ab: Cold IEC68-2-2 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Tests Bb: Dry Heat
IEC68-2-14 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Test Nb: Change ofTemperature
IEC68-2-30 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Test Db: Damp Heat,Cyclic
- - ,
IEC68-2-6 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Test Fc: Vibration(Sinusoidal) IEC68-2-29 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Test Eb: Bump IEC68-2-18 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Tests Rb: Water IEC68-2-32 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Test Ed: Free Fall
(Procedure 1)
- -
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
36/42
Environmental TestingEnvironmental Testing -- InstitutesInstitutes
All environmental testing is performed by the followingindependent test-institutes:ndependent test institutes: STFI Packforsk AB Stockholm-Kista, Sweden ,
Bors, Sweden UV-test is performed by Polykemi AB in Malm,
.
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
37/42
Vibration TestVibration Test Sinus (5Sinus (5--200 Hz, 10 m/s200 Hz, 10 m/s))
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
38/42
Shock & Bump Tests (100 m/sShock & Bump Tests (100 m/s x 100 b.) x 100 b.)
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
39/42
Salt Mist Test, Cyclic (40Salt Mist Test, Cyclic (40C, 72 hours)C, 72 hours)
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
40/42
ConclusionConclusion
Increased efficiency: up to 30 % increase in coverage
Reduced CAPEX: 30 % fewer sitescost optimized RF chain
,
size and wind loading and cost of towersite power and coolingsw er ro -ouFewer transmission hops
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
41/42
Increased Traffic:ConclusionConclusion-- ContCont
Increased Traffic: improved indoor penetrationimproved call-set up
increased trafficreduced interference,ncrease o a a roug pu
Reduced OPEX: Thanks to reduced number of sites(site rental, utilities, service org. etc)
-
7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna
42/42