CellMax Optimization Antenna

download CellMax Optimization Antenna

of 42

Transcript of CellMax Optimization Antenna

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    1/42

    OPTIMIZE AND REDUCE YOUR NETWORK INVESTMENTOPTIMIZE AND REDUCE YOUR NETWORK INVESTMENT

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    2/42

    COMPANYCOMPANY-- BackgroundBackground

    Founded: 2001

    Management: Extensive experience from suppliersEricsson, Nokia, Lucent, MSI, Allgon,LGP and Powerwave

    Location: Stockholm, Sweden

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    3/42

    COMPANYCOMPANY-- FacilitiesFacilities

    HQ, Tby

    Visby

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    4/42

    COMPANYCOMPANY-- Antenna ProductsAntenna Products

    Main Drivers are:

    To deliver the cheapest dBs on the market High efficiency Green power

    Performance

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    5/42

    COMPANYCOMPANY-- Technology AdvantageTechnology Advantage

    Gain (dBi) Vs Horizontal Beamwidth

    Main Antenna Manufacturers

    CellMax24

    25

    33 degree 65 degree

    CellMax2122

    1819

    15

    16HorizontalBeam width

    30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

    (Degrees)

    Source: InCode Wireless / VeriSign

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    6/42

    COMPANYCOMPANY-- Antenna ProductsAntenna Products

    Extremely Efficient Broad Band feedingnetwork Technology;

    High performing Negligible losses, (WYSIWG)

    Minimal soldering No cables

    ,Front to Back ratio and superior orthogonality

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    7/42

    COMPANYCOMPANY-- Antenna ProductsAntenna Products

    High gain with full beam shaping n enna pa ern exce ence Antenna null fill control Upper side lobe suppression

    High Gain stability Gain tracking Beam width control over frequency Tuning free production Gain efficiency versus size

    No in roduction or ost roduction tunin 100% reproducibility

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    8/42

    Wh Hi h Effi i ?hy High Efficiency ?

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    9/42

    WHY HIGH EFFICENCY?WHY HIGH EFFICENCY? -- Gain EvolutionGain Evolution

    NMT AMPS/GSM GSM/PCS3G

    WiMax

    z

    System

    12 12 12 12 12

    15 1518

    1518

    1518

    1518

    dBi

    21

    24

    21

    24>24

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    10/42

    WHY HIGH EFFICENCY?WHY HIGH EFFICENCY? Increased EIRPIncreased EIRP

    Standard 18 dBi Antenna CellMax 21dBi Antenna

    Coverage Increase up to 40%

    BTS reduction up to 30%

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    11/42

    ANTENNAANTENNA Nice Site ReductionNice Site Reduction

    47 Standard 18 dBi Antenna sites 37 CellMax 21dBi Antenna sites

    re ct ons y

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    12/42

    ANTENNAANTENNA Brussels Site ReductionBrussels Site Reduction

    66 Standard 18 dBi Antenna sites 50 CellMax 21dBi Antenna sites

    overage pro a y ncrease

    signifficantly with 24% fewer sites

    re c ons y

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    13/42

    WHY HIGH EFFICENCY?WHY HIGH EFFICENCY? Market driversMarket drivers

    CAPEX and OPEX reductions main drivers for operators

    3G demand all available power to support high bandwidthservices

    Swiftest and most cost effective means of optimization andquality improvement

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    14/42

    Wh C llM ?hy CellMax?

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    15/42

    MissionMission -- To increase data rate and coverageTo increase data rate and coverage

    100MMore upp/down link power,(higher C/N & C/I)LTE/

    WiMax

    10M

    HSPA

    Data rate is NOT limited by technology,

    but by received power / interference ratio

    100k

    UMTS

    10K

    Indoor local Wide area

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    16/42

    GSM PCS UMTSWhyWhy CellMaxCellMax?? EfficiencyEfficiency ComparisonComparison (2m)(2m)

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    17/42

    Why CellMax?Why CellMax? Conventional Feed networConventional Feed networ

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    18/42

    Why CellMax?Why CellMax? Conventional DipolesConventional Dipoles

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    19/42

    Why CellMax?Why CellMax? Received SS ComparisonReceived SS ComparisonCellMax 21dBi 4 deg vs. Typical 18dBi 2 deg, Sub UrbanCellMax 21dBi 4 deg vs. Typical 18dBi 2 deg, Sub Urban

    5 dB stronger level of null-fill

    Same rangeReduced

    Improved QoS

    Design Criteria

    Serving Cell

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    20/42

    Before AfterWhy CellMax?Why CellMax? Traffic Increase (rural)Traffic Increase (rural)

    Higher Signal Strength

    17 Erl.

    Fewer dropped calls

    Im roved Call Set u11 Erl.

    Increase in Traffic

    10-50%54% increase

    Rural, Sub-urban & Urban

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    21/42

    Why CellMax?Why CellMax? Traffic Increase (subTraffic Increase (sub--urban)urban)

    Cellmax average

    417 E

    30% increase

    Kathrein average

    Antenna

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    22/42

    Why CellMax?Why CellMax? -- Increased 3G ThroughputIncreased 3G Throughput

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    23/42

    7.5 km

    11 km

    +47% range increase

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    24/42

    The nodeB subject to the change

    antenna is indicated in figure

    with one arrow. Configuration RF

    has not been changed in the

    period considered for the tests

    (weeks 49 and 50)

    Sctors CPICH Qqualmin

    -

    48912 33 dBm -22 dB

    48913 34 dBm -22 dB48914 35 dBm -22 dB

    48915 34 dBm -22 dB

    -

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    25/42

    Why CellMax?Why CellMax? -- Increased 3G Throughput contIncreased 3G Throughput cont

    Without CELLMAX antenna With CELLMAX antenna

    WEEK 49

    Service Traffic [milliErlang]

    WEEK 50

    Service Traffic [milliErlang]

    VOICE 2625355

    VIDEO 131705

    PS @ 64 649931

    PS@ 128 64524

    VOICE 3585491

    VIDEO 192406

    PS @ 64 939897

    PS @ 128 117412

    PS@ 384 32541 PS @ 384 62897

    Performance

    Cell MAX

    VOICE +36.6%

    VIDEO +46.1%

    PS @ 64K +44.6%

    .

    PS @ 384K +93.3%

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    26/42

    100,0

    COST SAVINGCOST SAVING-- Antenna pos. on MastAntenna pos. on Mast

    70,0

    80,0

    90,0

    ters

    50,0

    60,0

    21 dBieightinM

    30,0

    40,018 dBi

    MastH

    10,0

    20,0

    ,

    500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 35

    Measured at Distance from site

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    27/42

    Freq. Band: 1710 - 2170 MHzANTENNAANTENNA -- CMACMA--B/6521B/6521

    Gain [dBi]: 20.4 / 20.7 / 21.2 HBW: 66.0o / 65.0o / 63.5o VBW: 4.6o / 4.2o / 3.9o VSWR: < 1.5:1 Isolation: >30dBsolation: >30dB F/B: >25dB USLS: >18dB 1st Null Fill: 20dB (10dB 60o LxWxD (mm): 2060 x 196 x 92

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    28/42

    ANTENNAANTENNA Vertical PatternVertical Pattern1st Upper Sidelobe

    Su ression

    Nullfill

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    29/42

    ANTENNAANTENNA Received SS ComparisonReceived SS Comparison

    First Null >30 dB stronger

    5 % ran e increase

    Design Criteria

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    30/42

    Freq. Band: 1710 - 2170 MHzANTENNAANTENNA -- CMACMA--B/3324B/3324

    Gain [dBi]: 23.2 / 23.6 / 24.0 HBW: 35o / 33o / 31o

    VBW 4 6o / 4 2o / 3 9o VBW: 4.6o / 4.2o / 3.9o VSWR: < 1.5:1 Isolation: >30dBsolation: 30dB F/B: >30dB USLS: >18dB 1st Null Fill: 20dB (10dB 30o)

    L W D ( ) 2070 288 128 LxWxD (mm): 2070 x 288 x 128

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    31/42

    ANTENNAANTENNA Cellmax 6Cellmax 6--sector solutionsector solution

    Cellmax24dBi,33deghighgainantenna

    GSM900MHzoverlaywithsameUMTSsitelocations

    +6dBstoatraditional18dBi

    linkbudgetTheoretically2.7timesthecoverageromas an ar sec ors emeans

    practicalsitesavingsof60%

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    32/42

    CellMaxCellMax testtest facilitiesfacilities-- SAAB AerospaceSAAB Aerospace

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    33/42

    CellMaxCellMax testtest facilitiesfacilities-- AerotechTelubAerotechTelub

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    34/42

    Environmental TestingEnvironmental Testing

    Specification of Environmental Tests for TelecommunicationsEquipment: ETSI 300 019-2-4: Class T4-1E

    Non-weather protected locations Extended. ETSI 300 019-2-1: Class T1.2

    Weather protected locations - not temperature controlled. ETSI 300 019-2-2: Class T2.2

    Careful trans ortation.

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    35/42

    Environmental TestsEnvironmental Tests

    IEC68-2-1 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Tests Ab: Cold IEC68-2-2 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Tests Bb: Dry Heat

    IEC68-2-14 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Test Nb: Change ofTemperature

    IEC68-2-30 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Test Db: Damp Heat,Cyclic

    - - ,

    IEC68-2-6 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Test Fc: Vibration(Sinusoidal) IEC68-2-29 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Test Eb: Bump IEC68-2-18 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Tests Rb: Water IEC68-2-32 Environmental Testing Part 2: Tests Test Ed: Free Fall

    (Procedure 1)

    - -

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    36/42

    Environmental TestingEnvironmental Testing -- InstitutesInstitutes

    All environmental testing is performed by the followingindependent test-institutes:ndependent test institutes: STFI Packforsk AB Stockholm-Kista, Sweden ,

    Bors, Sweden UV-test is performed by Polykemi AB in Malm,

    .

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    37/42

    Vibration TestVibration Test Sinus (5Sinus (5--200 Hz, 10 m/s200 Hz, 10 m/s))

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    38/42

    Shock & Bump Tests (100 m/sShock & Bump Tests (100 m/s x 100 b.) x 100 b.)

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    39/42

    Salt Mist Test, Cyclic (40Salt Mist Test, Cyclic (40C, 72 hours)C, 72 hours)

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    40/42

    ConclusionConclusion

    Increased efficiency: up to 30 % increase in coverage

    Reduced CAPEX: 30 % fewer sitescost optimized RF chain

    ,

    size and wind loading and cost of towersite power and coolingsw er ro -ouFewer transmission hops

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    41/42

    Increased Traffic:ConclusionConclusion-- ContCont

    Increased Traffic: improved indoor penetrationimproved call-set up

    increased trafficreduced interference,ncrease o a a roug pu

    Reduced OPEX: Thanks to reduced number of sites(site rental, utilities, service org. etc)

  • 7/27/2019 CellMax Optimization Antenna

    42/42