CEE 5614 Quick Overview of Aircraft Classifications Dr...
Transcript of CEE 5614 Quick Overview of Aircraft Classifications Dr...
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
CEE 5614
Quick Overview of Aircraft Classifications
Dr. Antonio A. Trani Professor
Civil and Environmental Engineering
January 2018
1
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Material Presented
• The aircraft and its impact operations in the NAS
• Aircraft classifications
• Explain the impact of aircraft classifications and their effect in aviation operations
2
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Relevance of Aircraft Characteristics
• Aircraft classifications are necessary in airport and airspace operations
• Most of the airport design standards are related to aircraft size (i.e., wingspan, aircraft length, aircraft wheelbase, aircraft seating capacity, etc.)
• Many of the same standards apply to the modeling and simulation of aviation operations
• The Next Generation (NextGen) air transportation system will cater to a more diverse pool of aircraft
3
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Aircraft Performance in Aviation Operations
Important to know the performance aspects of the aircraft on the ground and in the air to model aviation operations
4
source: https://contentzone.eurocontrol.int/aircraftperformance/details.aspx?ICAO=B738&NameFilter=737
source: A. A. Trani
source: Eurocontrol AircraftPerformance database
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Aircraft Performance in Aviation Operations
5
source:https://contentzone.eurocontrol.int/aircraftperformance/details.aspx?ICAO=DH8C&GroupFilter=9
source: A. A. Trani
source: Eurocontrol AircraftPerformance database
The turbo-prop aircraft shown to the right shows significant performance differences with the Boeing 737-800 presented in the previous slide
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Geometric Design Classification (ICAO)
6
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Design Criteria
7
• Planning airport operations requires information of various aircraft features
• The FAA considers three important features of every aircraft:
• Aircraft Approach Category (AAC)
• Airplane Design Group (ADG)
• Taxiway Design Group (TDG)
• The following slides provide some guidance in how to find these three attributes for each aircraft
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Aircraft Design Group (ADG) Classification
8
Design Group
Tail Height(Feet)
Wingspan(feet)
RepresentativeAircraft Types
I <20 <49 Cessna 172, Beech 36, Cessna 421, Learjet 35
II 20 to <30 49 to < 79 Beech B300, Cessna 550Falcon 50, Challenger 605
III 30 to <45 79 to < 118 Boeing 737, Airbus A320CRJ-900, EMB-190
IV 45 to < 60 118 to < 171 Boeing 767, Boeing 757,Airbus A300, Douglas DC-10
V 60 to < 66 171 to < 214 Boeing 747, Airbus A340, Boeing 777
VI 66 to <80 214 to < 262 Airbus A380, Antonov 124*
* The Antonov 225 has a wingspan of 290 feet (in a class by itself). Only one aircraft produced.
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
FAA Aircraft Approach Speed Classification (AAC)
9
Note: Approach speed varies with aircraft mass
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Example of Aircraft Approach Speed Variations
10
• Consider the Airbus A340-500 - a long-range aircraft
source:AirbusA340-500AirplaneCharacteristicsforAirportPlanning
• Approach speed at 180,000 kg landing mass ~ 125 knots
• Approach speed at 300,000 kg landing mass (maximum allowable landing mass) ~ 160 knots
ApproachSpeed(knots)
Max.AllowableLandingWeight300,000kg
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Source to Find Aircraft Approach Speed and Aircraft Mass (weight) Data
• FAA Advisory Circular AC/150 5300-13 Airport Design (Appendix 1)
11
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Presentation of Aircraft Characteristics in Appendix 1 of AC 150/5300-13
12
Aircraft Approach Class
Aircraft Design Group
Taxiway Design Group
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Taxiway Design Group (TDG)
• Previous FAA guidance considered tail height and wingspan as design factors for geometric design
• New guidance (Sep. 2012)
• Dimensions of the aircraft undercarriage are also important in geometric design
• New guidance for taxiway design considers Main gear Width (MGW) and Cockpit to Main gear Dimensions (CMG)
13
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
FAA AC 150/5300-13 Appendix 1
14
source: FAA AC 150/5300-13
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Consideration About CMG Distance vs Wheelbase Distance
• FAA specifies:
• Cockpit to Main Gear (CMG) dimension will be used instead of the aircraft wheelbase for aircraft where the cockpit is located forward of the nose gear (typically applies to commercial aircraft)
• For aircraft with the cockpit located aft of the nose gear, use the wheelbase instead of CMG to determine the Taxiway Design Group (TDG)
• See figures in previous slides
15
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Examples - Commercial Aircraft
• Most commercial aircraft have the cockpit located ahead of the nose gear (use CMG distance)
16
Boeing 737-300. Twin-engine turbofan powered, commercial aircraft
Cockpit to Main Gear Distance (CMG)
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Taxiway Design Group Definitions
17
source: FAA AC 150/5300-13
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Runway Design Code (RDC)
• Three parameters are combined to derive a so-called Runway Design Code (RDC)
• AAC, ADG and Approach Visibility Minimums
• RDC provides three parameters needed to determine certain design standards that apply at the airport
• Note: for some airport design projects the TDG parameters is also critical to determine taxiway-to-runway distances
18
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Approach Visibility Minimums
• Defined by a parameter called Runway Visual Range (RVR)
• “RVR is the range over which the Pilot of an aircraft on the centre line of a runway can see the runway surface markings or the lights delineating the runway or identifying its centre line.” (ICAO)
• RVR is normally expressed in feet or in meters
19
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Approach Visibility Minimums
20
Instrument Landing System Categories
source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjICabR4r3E
Category Decision Height (ft) RVR (ft)
I 200 2,400
II 100 1,600
IIIa 50-100 1,200
IIIb 0-50 600
IIIc 0-50 0
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Aircraft Characteristic Databases
• FAA site
• http://www.faa.gov/airports/engineering/aircraft_char_database/
• Excel file with aircraft data (http://128.173.204.63/courses/cee4674/cee4674_pub/aircraft_char_122009.xls) or at
• http://www.faa.gov/airports/engineering/aircraft_char_database/)
• Eurocontrol site
• http://elearning.ians.lu/aircraftperformance/
21
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Sample Excel Database of Aircraft Characteristics
• Available at:
• Excel file with aircraft data (http://128.173.204.63/courses/cee4674/cee4674_pub/aircraft_char_122009.xls) or at
• http://www.faa.gov/airports/engineering/aircraft_char_database/)
22
ARC = Airport Reference Code combines AAC and ADG
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Example Problem # 1
• An airport is to be designed to accommodate the Boeing 757-300 aircraft. Determine the airport reference code and the taxiway design group to be used.
23
• Look at the FAA aircraft database: Approach speed is 142 knots (AAC = D) and Wingspan is 124.8 feet and tail height 44.5 feet (thus group IV)
Solution:
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Picture the Aircraft in Question (Sanity Check)
24
Boeing 757-300 taking off at Punta Cana international Airport (A. Trani)
Aircraft pictures are available at: http://www.airliners.net
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Example Problem # 1
25
• Boeing 757-300 : Approach speed is 142 knots (AAC = D) and Wingspan is 124.8 feet and tail height 44.5 feet (belongs to group IV)
Boeing 757-300Belongs to Group
IV
Reason: tail height falls into III group,wingspan belongs
to group IVUse the most
critical
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Wake Vortex• Every aircraft generates wakes behind the
wing due to the strong circulation required to generate lift
26
Circulation Strength Boundary
Wake vortices depend on aircraft mass, wingspan and atmospheric
conditions
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Legacy FAA Wake Vortex Classification
27
Superheavy
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Wake Vortex Recategorization Classification
• FAA Introduced a new re-categorization procedure at Memphis International Airport in 2012
• Consult FAA Order N JO 7110.608
28
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
New Wake Vortex Classification• The new Re-Categorization (Phase 1) standards have been
developed by FAA and ICAO
• Aircraft groups have changed!
• A = Superheavy aircraft, F = small aircraft
29
Blank cells are either3 nm or 2.5 nm
depending on the airport
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
New Wake Vortex Classification (RECAT Phase 1)
30
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory 31
New Wake Vortex Classification (RECAT Phase 1)
RECATClass
RepresentativeAircraft PictureofRepresentativeAircraft
A AirbusA380-800
B Boeing747-400,Boeing777-300ER,AirbusA330-300,AirbusA350-900,AirbusA300-600,Boeing
787-8/9C McDonnellDouglasDC-10,BoeingMD-10,Boeing
DouglasMD-11,Boeing767-300
D Boeing757-200and-300,Boeing737-800,AirbusA320,AirbusA321,McDonnellDouglasMD-80,
Embraer190,BombardierCS-300,Gulfstream550and650
E BombardierCRJ-900,Embraer170/175,BombardierCRJ-700,Embraer145,Bombardier
CRJ-200,DassaultFalcon7X
F CessnaCitationJet4,GulfstreamG280,BombardierChallenger350,Cessna182,Cessna172
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Implications of Aircraft Wake Classes
• In-trail separations are driven by wake class groups
• Runway capacity today is usually driven by in-trail separations
32
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Example # 2
• Estimate the approximate arrival capacity to a single runway at La Guardia airport if 100% of the arrivals belong to the large wake class (now Category D under RECAT Phase 1)
• Assume the typical approach speed of arrivals is 140 knots from the final approach fix to the runway
33
2.5 nm + 20 second buffer Runway 04-22at LGA
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Example # 2 (cont.)
• A 2.5 nautical miles + 20 second buffer translates into a headway (i.e., time between successive arrivals) of :
• The arrival capacity is the inverse of headway
34
2.5 nm + 20 second buffer
140 knots140 knots
headway = 2.5nm140nm / hr
⎧⎨⎩
⎫⎬⎭3600s / hr + 20s = 84.3s
Carrivals =3600s / hr
84.3s= 42 arrivals/hr
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
International Air Transport Association (IATA) Classification
• Used in the forecast of aircraft movements at an airport based on the IATA forecast methodology
35
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Other Classifications often mentioned in Aviation Trade Magazines
• Aircraft classification based on the aircraft use
• General aviation aircraft (GA)
• Corporate aircraft (CA)
• Commuter aircraft (COM)
• Transport aircraft (TA)
• Short-range
• Medium-range
• Long-range
36
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
General Aviation Aircraft
37
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Corporate Aircraft
38
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Commuter Aircraft
39
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Short-Range Transport Aircraft
40
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Medium-Range Transport Aircraft
41
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Long-Range Transport Aircraft
42
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory 43
Web Sites to Learn to Recognize Various Aircraft• Pictures taken by the author at various airport (https://photos.app.goo.gl/
8bdSvdwPQU7lHIDi2)• Airliners site airliners.net • Jetphotos (https://www.jetphotos.com)• Eurontrol Aircraft Database (https://contentzone.eurocontrol.int/
aircraftperformance/default.aspx?)
AerospatialeATR-42-500
AirbusA380-800
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Aircraft Trends
• Very large capacity aircraft (introduced in the third quarter of 2007)
• Airbus A380 and Boeing 747-8
• New generation ultra-efficient, long-range transport
• Boeing 787 and Airbus A350
• New generation short range aircraft
• Bombardier C-Series, Mitsubishi Regional Jet (MRJ), Comac 919 and Irkut MC-21
44
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Aircraft Wing Aspect Ratio (AR)
45
AR = b2 / SARb2
wing aspect ratio (dimensionless)
wingspan (ft2 or m2)
S wing area (ft2 or m2)
b
S
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Evolution of Aircraft Wing Aspect Ratios
• Long range aircraft require very long and thin wings to be aerodynamically efficient
46
Future aircraftdesigns
Air Transportation Systems Laboratory
Evolution of Aircraft Mass and Wingspan
47