Cause & Corrective Action Traininga
-
Upload
sathish-muthusamy -
Category
Documents
-
view
98 -
download
3
Transcript of Cause & Corrective Action Traininga
Instructions on how to complete form QA10
1
Root Cause Process Flow Chart
#6Verify Root Cause
#7Develop Corrective Action
#9Verify Effectiveness
#1
Define Problem
#2
Determine Approach
2
PPI Corrective Action Form
The Excel sheet consist of 6 tabs:
1. The CAR tab
2.The Fish tab
3.The Immediate tab
4.The Multi tab
5.Evidence tab
6.The How to tab
PPI uses QA 10 form to establish and outline the process for
identifying, documenting, analyzing and implementing corrective
actions.
3
The 1st tab is the CAR tab.This tab describes the
Non-conformance and all pertinent information as:
a) The date the CAR was answered
b) The effectivity date –this is the date the CA implementation becomes
effective
c) The immediate corrective action
d) The Root Cause
e) The Root Cause Corrective action
Plan
1. The CA Number
2. The initiator
3. The Audit area
4. Finding Classification: Minor/Major
5. References: As applicable
6. P.O.
7. Job No
8. Who is this CAR assigned to.
9. The requirement
10. The Non-compliance
11. The Date CAR was issued
12. The Date assignee should answer
The assignee is responsible
for filling out the following:
4
Corrective Action Request – 1st Tab Continuation
Define Immediate Corrective Action taken
EXAMPLE: The internal procedure for the qualification of lay-up personnel does
not meet BAC5317
Define the actions taken immediately to:
Stop the Non-conformance
Assess the damage
Segregated Impacted product
Notify as appropriate
Immediate Corrective Action:
Good Response: Procedure was reviewed in its entirety against the requirements of BAC5317 and approved by the QA Manager. Procedure attached, note – Changes made are specifically identified on our procedure change sheet.
Poor Response: Modified Procedure
What action was taken following the issue being discovered?
Did you stop the problem from continuing?
Did you contain the problem found?
These actions address the immediate or direct cause of the NCR5
How to create an analysis Fishbone Diagram
1) Define the problem – What Needs to change?
2) Determine Approach –
3) Brainstorm – Generate potential causes of a problem
4) Review Causes -
5) Classify Causes - From mild to worst
6) Verify Root Cause - Determine the major cause
7) Develop Corrective Action – The Plan
8) Implementation – Are we following the plan?
9) Verify Effectiveness – How well did it work?
2nd tab – Fish Bone Diagram
6
The 2nd tab Continuation - Fishbone
diagram
In order to complete the fishbone diagram first you must brainstorm all possible causes that could have led to the root cause of the noncompliance.
Develop the major bones of the diagram.
Note: Brainstorm all possible causes even seemingly improbable causes.
Effect
The Root cause
assessment Matrix in the
following slide is a tool that
one can use to fill out the
Fishbone diagram.
7
Root CauseAssessment Matrix
The Root cause assessment Matrix is a tool that one can use to fill out the Fishbone diagram.
It will give you basic root causes for different circumstances.
Use this matrix to brainstorm possible causes and attach them to the appropriate branches.
Just double click on the matrix and it will open into a word document.
Root Cause Assessment Matrix
1 of 4
People Training Procedures
No people available No training available No procedures exist
People not qualified Training insufficient/not thorough
Procedures are not clear, are confusing, or are of poor quality
People call in sick No syllabus available Procedures conflict with other procedures
People waste time. Incomplete syllabus Procedures do not address issue at hand
Longer breaks than necessary No tests available Procedures are incorrect
People insecure in abilities Insufficient testing Procedures are not complete
People are overworked No procedures to train to Procedure manuals not available
People did not know they had to do that. Recurrent training needed
Lack of knowledge on using manuals or
work instructions
Falsification of records No “New Procedure” training Manual/procedures not current
Falsification of time sheets No training on using company manuals No backup procedures
Subversion or sabotage
No formal computer or software use training program in place
Procedures located in wrong chapter or manual
Do not know how to use manuals Instructor is not qualified in subject Manual format style is confusing
Lack of motivation Poor instruction skills Flow of manual is poor
Frustration – management does not listen to our ideas Lack of instruction tools
Terms used within the manuals are not identified
People resistant to change
Instruction tools are not available at the training facility being used.
Definitions for terms determined by company not identified or clear
People are not willing to learn
Self Training tools/materials/manuals not available to personnel
Manual/procedures not required for all departments that need it.
People did not care to follow procedures Poor or incomplete indoctrination training Weak enforcement procedures
People not held accountable for actions
Poor or incomplete department/position specific indoctrination training No checklist or trigger available
Personnel do not know about Self Training tools/materials/manuals which are available
to them No department/position specific indoctrination syllabus
Procedure creation flow is poor or non-existent
People not accustom to facility/area elevation Insufficient training materials for students
Manual incorrectly revised – pages missing or in wrong place
Personnel attempting to work while ill or injured Lack of training resources Different forms exist for same procedure
General human factors Decision made not to train
Completion instructions for forms are not documented
Personnel on medication which affects physical/mental aptitude or abilities Poor training program/design
Same forms are completed differently by different departments
People distracted by event or issue
Identification tags being used for
additional issues or conditions
People with animosity toward coworkers or
management. Step sequencing is wrong
Supervisory personnel not knowledgeable in area or procedures More than one action per step
General horse play
Low or stopped workload resulting in
boredom/idle hands
Knowledge based decision required by lack of knowledge
2nd tab – Fish Bone Diagram continuation
8
Define Root Cause of the Non-conformance
Investigate all causes contributing to the non-conformance using the fishbone diagram. The root cause will be the last cause in the chain and requires a 5-Why analysis.
EXAMPLE:
The internal procedure for the qualification of lay-up personnel does not
meet BAC5317
Only the identified root cause should be included in your response. Supplemental information to support your cause analysis may be included as objective evidence if necessary.
Root Cause:
Good R/C: Inadequate review of our procedure against the customer
standard due to lack of formal review procedure and lack of assigned
personnel to this task.
Poor R/C: We have been audited by many customers in the past and
Nadcap and this has never been a problem.
2nd tab Continuation – Fish Bone Diagram
9
The 2nd tab also contains
the 5 why’s section
The bottom portions contains the 5 Why’s
section.
How to Complete the 5 Why section:
1) Write down the specific problem
2) Ask why the problem happened and write
the answer down below the problem
3) If the answer you just provided does not
identify the root cause of the problem you
wrote down in step 1, ask why again and
write that answer down
4) Loop back to step 3 until the problem’s root
cause is identified
This make take fewer or more times than five
Whys.
Asking Why many times often brings
you to the real root cause …..
One you may not have never noticed.
10
The 3rd tab contains the Containment Section of the C/A
In this section you will define the containment action and Impact of all identified causes and Root Cause.
What Impact did the Nonconformance actually have?
•Parts affected?
•Were parts shipped to customer?
•Contact Customer
Define Impact
EXAMPLE:
The internal procedure for the
qualification of lay-up personnel does not
meet BAC5317
Impact to Hardware:
Good Response: None, this discrepancy
was procedural only. All qualification
records were reviewed and found to be
in compliant with BAC5317
Poor Response: None
11
The 4th tab covers the Multiple Follow-up dates
This section of the C/A would only need to be filled by QA Department.
12
The 5th tab will hold objective evidence
You will need to provide Objective evidence:
What information can you provide to
demonstrate the RCCA process applied to the
NCR?
This evidence can be in the form of changing or
creating a new procedure, implementation of a
new system, performed training/awareness of
personnel, new checklist,
For the example to the right:
The Noncompliance was the used of spray
adhesive 77 vs. the requirements of the EWI.
The objective evidence provided to support the
corrective action is the EWI was revised,
personnel were trained to the updated EWI and
signs were posted inside the layup room
designating an area for the use of spray adhesive
77 only.
…SHOW IT!!
13
Corrective Action Response Requirements
Define the Actions taken to prevent recurrence:
Example:
The internal procedure for the qualification of lay-up personnel does not meet
BAC5317
What is the long term action to prevent recurrence?
Can only be addressed when the root cause is known.
Actions taken to Prevent Recurrence:
Good Action: Review teams have been created to address the review of all internal procedures. The teams will compromise of two individuals and will perform a back review of the process specification against customer standard for compliance. The reviewers will complete a document review sheet, the procedure will be changed as identified on the review sheet and forwarded to the relevant personnel for approval.
Poor Action: Revised Procedure
Do not Rush, consider the effectiveness, feasibility, suitability to the
company, and the company’s budget.
14
The 6th tab is the How To slide
This slide holds specific instructions on how to fill out the 1st tab.
15