Case Stuy 004

download Case Stuy 004

of 4

Transcript of Case Stuy 004

  • 8/12/2019 Case Stuy 004

    1/4

    1. MTTAssociates than Joint Venture Company

    Malaysian Turkistan Travel Sdn. Bhd was founded under 40% ownership to MTSB and

    60% to TGS. The established company hence was considered as a Joint venture company

    and a subsidiary of MTSB. However, in order to recognize MTT as a joint venture

    company, both the parties should invest equally in-terms of money, time and effort to

    build on the original concept (Joint Venture).

    MTSB also considers MTT as its subsidiary company, although its share is less than 50

    % percent and its authority to control decisions and make policy is insignificant.

    Therefore, MTT cannot get the title as a subsidiary of MTSB unless it possesses half the

    share and obtains influencing power in MTT. (Subsidiary)

    Recommendation

    MTT seems to follow associate company format rather than Joint Venture Company.

    Hence, MTSB and TGS could reassess the MOU and divide shares equally to recognize

    MTT as a joint venture and subsidiary company. Consequently, it would give more

    power to MTSB in decision making and control irregularities.

    2.

    MOU and MOA interchange

    Memorandum of Understanding between MTSB and GTS lacks many crucial contents

    that are supposed to be in proper MOU such as general rules and policies, requirements

    and responsibilities of parties involved, etc. In contract, it defines the prospect of business

    collaboration, objectives, liabilities to be shared, etc. Hence, the presented MOU of MTT

    is more into Memorandum of Association as it governs relationship between the company

    and outside. (Memorandum of Association)

    Recommendation

    MTSB and GTS should understand the concept of MOU and include requirements and

    responsibilities of both party and it should be contractually bounded through Articles of

    Association or Memorandum of Agreement. The presented MOU could be converted to

  • 8/12/2019 Case Stuy 004

    2/4

    MOA as it serves more in defining business prospect than explaining obligation of parties

    involved.

    3. Share Capital not in Balance Sheet

    The Share capital or Paid up Capital contributed by MTSB and GTS is not mentioned in

    Projected Balance Sheet and this error might have occurred because of relationship based

    transaction between the involved parties. The Board member of TGS, Mr. Omar Yatim

    met his father Yatim Nor, an Executive Director of MTSB to form a joint venture

    company MTT. Hence, the family relation between the parties who founded MTT could

    be the reason for not mentioning total share value of RM. 2,358,935.00.

    Recommendation

    To project the proper and accurate financial transaction, MTT should include its paid up

    capital in contributed capital. It should also establish accounting committee to arrange,

    collect and record financial transaction for future use.

    4. RM 2 Company to RM. 250,000.00

    The RM2 Company is the company with RM2 as paid up capital. Any RM2 company

    indicated that the company is not financially strong, the founder of the company or the

    founding directors only contribute RM2 to form the company.

    MTT increased its paid up capital from RM 2 to RM 250,000 after few months of

    commencement. This rapid increase in capital could be the hoax amount to gain the

    confidence of shareholders and government authorities as there was no audited accounts

    neither issued to the shareholders nor filing made with the Companies Commission of

    Malaysia.

    Recommendation

    The relationship based transaction between MTSB and GTS should be avoided

    effectively and the parties involved in the reformation of MTT must not have family or

  • 8/12/2019 Case Stuy 004

    3/4

    any kind of relationship that would influence the contract. The MTT should also maintain

    proper accounting procedures and record evidences to support every financial transaction.

  • 8/12/2019 Case Stuy 004

    4/4

    B

    Joint Venture. (n.d.). Retrieved from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_venture

    Memorandum of Association. (n.d.). Retrieved from Wikipedia:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memorandum_of_association

    Subsidiary. (n.d.). Retrieved from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsidiary

    ibliography

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47yv7yMMggQ

    http://teochiewkia2010.blogspot.com/2010/02/rm2-company.html

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memorandum_of_agreement

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drB1ZscutB0

    Subsidiary. (n.d.). Retrieved from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsidiary

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47yv7yMMggQhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47yv7yMMggQhttp://teochiewkia2010.blogspot.com/2010/02/rm2-company.htmlhttp://teochiewkia2010.blogspot.com/2010/02/rm2-company.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memorandum_of_agreementhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memorandum_of_agreementhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drB1ZscutB0http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drB1ZscutB0http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memorandum_of_agreementhttp://teochiewkia2010.blogspot.com/2010/02/rm2-company.htmlhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47yv7yMMggQ