CASE STUDY (SCENARIO 1)

1. Its the companys problem and not Ramon Reynoso. Why? He was given too broad a positions functions being a Planning Specialist. The task of which as according to the text, being in-charge of the trainings and programs and its needs are but still on his hands as his function as Planning Specialist dictates. So he is not in a position to be moved by such a chaos on the part of his fellow employees because as it is the nature of his job which the company has put to his trust.

The fact that Ramon did his best for the job and presented his original ideas on the system of the company he done nothing wrong. Fact is, theres no problem before the work was presented for Ramon never anticipated such since his proposal was not considered by the new director of the new branch and instead the new supply officers proposal for the installation of new computers was commended.

It was actually a foul on the part of the director and the planning officers they should have been the ones considered, not Ramon.

2-3. Vice-Presidents moves on the matter is delicate.a. He should have studied comprehensively the position, job descriptions and functions of Ramon Reynoso as Planning Specialist which is too broad being such.b. He should have studied the Companys Organizational Chart and the function of each presented position (because there must be other functions not specified on the job of Ramon or vice-versa or other positions) like Purchasing Manager/Procurement Officer.c. The statement of the Vice-President for Ramon He should be transferred is not appropriate and that is tackles. The case should be treated with confidentiality since resistance amongst the fellow employees on the matter should be settled first among the higher-ups only and not with every employee.d. Vice-President must consider the credibility of the company and the management as protected by the Labor Laws.e. Ramon should not be condemned by the fellow employees as it is the higher-ups problem not his as entrusting Ramon too broad a function of the Planning Specialist.4. Ramon Reynoso should:a. As having researched on the origin of the chaos which he was the author as according to his fellow employees of which the blame should not be put to Ramon only as it is the companys FOUL: having entrusted the Planning Specialist so much.b. Ramon Reynoso should not be moved but as one of the higher-ups must seek legal counsel on the matter and may file a case versus the company and its higher-ups having been insubordinated by the Director and the Supply Officer then as tacklessly recommended for transfer by the Vice-President. So he may include the Vice-President is the case file, thus, he will have vengeance.

(PRINCIPALS CHOICE)1. The teacher has the right to question the Principal. The question imposed was just right since it is the privilege of the teacher involved to have the right rating as he wants. The insecurity is reflected on the part of the Principal the reason his performance rating was adjusted to a low rate.2. There must be proper information dissemination on the part of the higher-up and the teacher so there wont be commotion. Teacher and Principal must be in communion with the rating requirements as well as their agreement on the rating procedures.

THE TRANSFER1. Its normal to be out casted in the company since he is neophyte in the company. He is in the period of adjustment. 2. Comparison between the former and the new company he is employed is but normal.3. Theres no ideal place. Its the attitude of the employee of the individual whos got work.4. Observe, compare and contrast and adjust based on the observation but he cant stand it, leave it!5. No, he will have socialization with employees first to adjust to know and to be familiar with the physiological and sociological inputs and outputs of the company and employees.6. Yes, its okay. Its natural. Comments based on experience are but natural and healthy. Constructive criticisms are helpful for improvement and everything nowadays be it good or bad as being discussed openly.