Case study: artplayer.tv

18
Case Study: Artplayer.tv – preparing for internet TV and creating opportunities for venues and artist Roger McKinley, Production Manager – FACT

description

Digital R&D Fund for Arts and Culture: Digital Day (Bristol) Case study: artplayer.tv Roger McKinley, Production Manager, FACT Dave Moutrey, Director & Chief Executive, Cornerhouse Preparing for Internet TV and creating opportunities for venues and artists. On 7 June 2011 Arts Council England, the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) and the National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA) announced a new £500,000 Digital R&D Fund for Arts and Culture, for projects that harness digital technologies to connect with wider audiences and explore new ways of working. Project proposals will focus on six key ares: six areas: user-generated content and social media; distribution; mobile, location and games; data; resources; and education and learning. The Digital days aim to: - encourage new partnerships and collaborations between arts and cultural organisations and technology companies - inform participant about opportunities of using digital technologies - provide information on the Digital R&D Fund for Arts and Culture. For more information visit http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/funding/digital-rd-fund-arts-culture/

Transcript of Case study: artplayer.tv

Page 1: Case study: artplayer.tv

Case Study: Artplayer.tv –preparing for internet TV and creating opportunities for venues and artist

Roger McKinley, Production Manager – FACT

Page 2: Case study: artplayer.tv
Page 3: Case study: artplayer.tv

FACT (Foundation for Art and CreativeTechnology) has been supporting the UKvideo, film and new media arts scene forover 20 years with groundbreakingexhibitions, education and researchprojects and support services. Theorganisation aims to pioneer new forms ofartistic and social interaction withindividuals and communities.

During its history, FACT has commissionedand presented over 250 digital mediaworks with artists including Pipilotti Rist,Bill Viola, Apichatpong Weerasethakul, VitoAcconci and Isaac Julien.

FACT

Page 4: Case study: artplayer.tv
Page 5: Case study: artplayer.tv

IT IS NOT A FACT PRODUCT

IT IS AN ASSET FOR THE ARTS SECTOR

X

Page 6: Case study: artplayer.tv

A Free to Use, Online, National Media Player for the Arts

Developed by

What is it?

Designed for National Portfolio Organisations, as a single site to gather their moving image content, for all to see

Page 7: Case study: artplayer.tv

What Will it Look Like?

Website

Page 8: Case study: artplayer.tv

With partners from different arts practices:

Page 9: Case study: artplayer.tv

Apart from a platform, what else is artplayer.tv providing?

Training in recording techniques

Training in editing techniques

Training in managing content

Page 10: Case study: artplayer.tv

What might this content look like?

Copyright Site Gallery

Page 11: Case study: artplayer.tv

Who Wants and Needs It? – Statistics bit (Response rate 145 RFOs)

70% of organisations produce their own video content.

86% publish their own video content online.

Organisations own websites (36%)

75% feel that their organisation would benefit from video production training for their staff.

93% of organisations would be interested in using an online video platform.

Key factors to organisations:

“The platform’s success in promoting the UK arts industry” (81%)

“The amount of traffic that is generated to the organisation’s website” (78%)

“The relevance of the website’s audience” (74%).

Survey by

Page 12: Case study: artplayer.tv

Survey by

What is currently used? (Response rate 145 RFOs)

Arts Organisations use of video sharing platforms

YouTube (84%)

Vimeo (41%)

Organisations own websites (36%)

Facebook (15%)

Page 13: Case study: artplayer.tv

Who Wants and Needs It?- Arts Organisations – showcasing the work they do- Artists - aggregating their work in the UK, profiling, footage of their work

How Do We Reach Them?- Go out to organisations, demonstrate its value and promote it’s use

- Create multiple active artplayer channels, with as much content from keypartner organisations as possible.

- Distribute content through interactive outlets built in or connected to the site including the artplayer blog, social media services such as Facebookand Twitter.

- Create an online advertising campaign that directs organisations to the site

- Push affiliated content on artplayer to other video sharing accounts (YouTube, Vimeo etc.)

Page 14: Case study: artplayer.tv

Marketing Strategy

Goals Key Metrics

Driving uptake of the creation of artplayer.tv channels Channel sign-ups

Active users

Video uploads

Driving traffic towards videos posted to artplayer.tv Video views

Video sharing

Traffic sources

Page 15: Case study: artplayer.tv

Therefore also looking at (4-6 content pieces per month according to PH Survey)…

The Met (Live music events, recording studios) – Bury v +

The Midi Music Company (poetry, music)– London n/v -

Frantic Assembly – (contemporary dance theatre) London v +

Dance4 (contemporary dance) – Nottingham v +

Sampad (South Asian Arts Dance) Birmingham n/v -

Apples and Snakes (poetry)– Deptford, London v -

Aldeburgh Music (music)– Snape, Suffolk n/v -

Page 16: Case study: artplayer.tv

When?

March 2011 - Project Started

June 2011 - Platform Development first stage finished (including first phase training and content creation)

June 2011 - Platform testing

July 2011 - Interim period of reporting (artplayer.tv administration only)

August/September/October 2011 – channel and content growth, dissemination

End October - Platform delivery to ACE for assessment

November/December - Final Period of Reporting and “next steps” (all partners)

Page 17: Case study: artplayer.tv

Where else does it go?

Partnership – Technical (BBC) and other Cultural Industries

Innovation – Working with emerging platforms (IPTV)

Training

Creating sector services

Page 18: Case study: artplayer.tv

Thank You!