Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

32
1/18/2011 1 1 2

Transcript of Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

Page 1: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

1

1

2

Page 2: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

2

Energy Conservation(Free Encyclopedia): Efforts to reduce energy consumption through the result of several processes or developments, such as productivity increase or technological progress.

Energy Efficiencygy y(Free Encyclopedia): The goal of efforts to reduce the amount of energy required to provide products and services. It is achieved when energy intensity in a specific product, process or area of production or consumption is reduced without affecting output, consumption or comfort levels. Sometimes called efficient energy use.

Energy Management• Energy Management is a technical and management function the remit of whichEnergy Management is a technical and management function the remit of which

is to monitor, record, analyze, critically examine, alter and control energy flows through system so that energy is utilized with maximum efficiency. (Paul O’ Callaghan, Energy Management)

• The strategy of adjusting and optimizing energy, using systems and procedures so as to reduce energy requirements per unit of output while holding constant or reducing total costs of producing the output from these systems (Bureau of Energy Efficiency, India) 3

Energy Audit (Free Encyclopedia)

An energy audit is an inspection, survey and analysis of energy flows for energy conservation in a building, an industry, process or system to reduce the amount of energy input into the system without negatively affecting the output(s).g y g p ( )

Energy Audit (US Agency for International Development)

Energy audit is a tool to identify areas where energy can be conserved.

Energy Audit (Guide Book: Energy Audit)

The verification, monitoring and analysis of use of energy including submission of technical report containing recommendations for improving energy efficiency with cost benefit analysis and an action p g gy y yplan to reduce energy consumption.

Audit Energi (PP 70 tahun 2009 tentang Konservasi Energi)

Adalah proses evaluasi pemanfaatan energi dan identifikasi peluang penghematan energi serta rekomendasi peningkatan efisiensi pada pengguna energi dan pengguna sumber energi dalam rangka konservasi energi.

4

Page 3: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

3

Preliminary Energy AuditPreliminary energy audit is a relatively quick exercise to: • Establish energy consumption in the organization • Estimate the scope for saving • Identify the most likely (and the easiest areas for attention)• Identify immediate (especially no-cost/low-cost) improvements/savings• Set a ‘reference point’ • Identify areas for more detailed study/measurement • Preliminary energy audit uses existing, or easily obtained data

Detailed Energy AuditA comprehensive audit provides a detailed energy project implementation plan for a facility since it evaluates all major energy using systems This type of audita facility, since it evaluates all major energy using systems. This type of audit offers the most accurate estimate of energy savings and cost. It considers the interactive effects of all projects, accounts for the energy use of all major equipment, and includes detailed energy cost saving calculations and project cost.

In a comprehensive audit, one of the key elements is the energy balance. This is based on an inventory of energy using systems, assumptions of current operating conditions and calculations of energy use. This estimated use is then compared to utility bill charges. 5

Pemanfaatan energi oleh pengguna sumber energi dan pengguna

energi wajib dilakukan secara hemat dan efisien

(Pasal  12)

energi wajib dilakukan secara hemat dan efisien. Pengguna sumber energi dan pengguna energi yang

menggunakan sumber energi dan/atau energi lebih besar atau sama dengan 6.000 (enam ribu) setara ton minyak per tahun wajib melakukan konservasi energi melalui manajemen energi.

Manajemen energi dilakukan dengan:

menunjuk manajer energi;

menyusun program konservasi energi;

6

melaksanakan audit energi secara berkala;

melaksanakan rekomendasi hasil audit energi; dan

melaporkan pelaksanaan konservasi energi setiap tahun kepada Menteri, gubernur, atau bupati/walikota sesuai dengan kewenangannya masing-masing.

Page 4: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

4

7

8

Page 5: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

5

Industrial plantshigh energy intensity

Other sectors:Energy sector

Process IndustryEnergy Analysis

EnergyAudit

Programme

Power Plant Energy Analysis

Specific UtilityEnergy Audit

CH

EM

EAirAudit intensity

Industrialplants

Small – Medium Enterprices

Small buildingsservice sector

Large buildingsi t

BuildingAudit

IndustrialEnergyAudit

EnergyInspection Post-

acceptanceEnergy

Audit

Follow-upEnergyAudit

IndustrialEnergy

Analysis

Programme

Updatingwith

industrialmodels

TH

E V

OL

UN

TA

RY

AG

RE

EM

EN

T S

C

Infra-red Audit

HVACAudit

ElectricalAudit

IndustrialEnergyAudit

Building EnergyAudit

Model not subsidised / Commercial AuditsModel subsidised /

Partnership Program

service sector

Blocks / Apartment / flats / Neighbourhood

Small residential buildings

T

9

Freelance energy auditors

Energy Audit / Energy Management Consultants

Mechanical & Electrical Consultants

Equipment manufacturers / suppliers

Energy committee in industries

Energy audit training centers

R h t Research centers

Universities

Related government officers

Others

10

Page 6: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

6

11

– Seeking for where the greatest energy Seeking for where the greatest energy consumed goes to

– Measuring the energy losses started from the greatest energy consumer

– Analyzing the problem bli hi i – Establishing a saving strategy

– Calculating the saving and payback period

– Implementing the strategy 12

Page 7: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

7

1. Energy Consumption (kWh, Joule)

2 Energy Intensity / Specific Energy Consumption2. Energy Intensity / Specific Energy Consumption

(kWh/Ton Prod), (Ton Steam/Ton Prod), (kWh/m2/bl)

(kW/TR), (liter of Oil/Ton Steam), (lumen/watt)

3. Lighting Intensity (lux) for specific activity

4. Power Intensity (watt/m2, pk/m2)

5. Energy Distribution (Energy used and losses). 5. Energy Distribution (Energy used and losses).

6. Efficiency and effectively of equipment

7. Aspects of human comfort and lighting comfort

8. Energy saving potentials (kWh/thn, Rp/thn.)

9. Energy Management Planning13

Inefficient design of utility systems

Configurations, settings, and/or operation of utility system are inefficient

Lack of knowledge and lack of discipline of the operators, energy managers to the effect of energy wastage

Scheduling and maintenance of equipment are not optimal

Utilities and its components in industrial processes are working at low efficiencyat low efficiency

Do not follow the basic procedures, control system is not functioning, and/or setting the system does not comply the requirement

Sensors or control systems are not functioning properly14

Page 8: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

8

15

IMP 1

TransducersIntegrated Measuring Pods

Light IntensityLight Intensity

Electrical CurrentElectrical Current

IMP 2

IMP n

Electrical LoadElectrical Load

COCO22, O, O22 & CO& CO

HumidityHumidity

TemperatureTemperature

PressurePressure

FlowFlow

•• Measure Existing ParametersMeasure Existing Parameters•• Analyze Existing EquipmentAnalyze Existing Equipment

E l t E i ti I t ll tiE l t E i ti I t ll ti•• Evaluate Existing InstallationEvaluate Existing Installation•• Study Current Consumption BehaviorStudy Current Consumption Behavior

and Patternand Pattern

16

Page 9: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

9

$avingsAchievement:

C t Eff ti– Cost Effective

– Efficiency

– Optimal

– Reliability

Searching New TechnologySearching New TechnologyConsideration:

Energy Efficient

Reliability

Low Investment Cost17

ReducingThe OperationalCosts

ImprovementOf Performance

The Performance of Units

Energy Consumption

Load Characteristic

Energy Consumption

The Performance of Systems

Operating Costs

18

Page 10: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

10

19

20

Page 11: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

11

Executive Summary Energy Balance Profile of Energy Consumption Specific Energy Consumption Specific Energy ConsumptionIntroductory Background Aims and Goals Scope of Activities MethodologyEvaluation of Thermal Systems Thermal Energy Balance Thermal Energy Consumption

C b i S & Th l A l i Combustion System & Thermal Analysis Heat Integration and Process AnalysisElectrical System Evaluation Electrical Energy Balance Electrical Energy Consumption Demand Factor AnalysisEvaluation of Energy Management Asessemen of Energy Management 21

22

Page 12: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

12

Lift = 6.89%121.51 MWh/mo

Lighting = 10.63%187.43 MWh/mo

Others = 18.34%323.5 MWh/mo

Air Cond. System = 64.14%1,131.20 MWh/mo

PLN Supply = 100%1,763.64 MWh/Mo

Essential: 45.51%1,094.48 kW

Essential: 22 64%

Non-Essenttial: 2.46%59.17 kW

Essential: 22.64%416.96 kW

Non-Essential: 24.08%443.60 kW

Essential: 1.24%38.33 kW

Non-Essential: 4.06%124.62 kW

Garden Wing: 5.31% = 162.95 kW

PLN Supply = 100%2,177.16 kW

Tech Bld: 47.97%1,153.65 kW

Main Bld: 47.97%1,153.65 kW

23

24

Page 13: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

13

1 Building Type Office

2 Year Built 2005

4 Gross Floor Area M2 3,040

3 Conditioned Floor Area M2 2,736

Reference

5 Average Electricity Bill per Month Rp. 41,026,097

Power Capacity Contract / Type kVA 414 / B3

6 Electrical Consumption per Month kWh/Mo 57,907

7 Electrical Energy Intensity of Conditioned Area kWh/y m2 253.98200

0 - 100ASEAN Energy AwardNZEB / EE Showcases

8 Type of LampsVarious

capacity

TL, PL-C, HALOGEN, HALOPAR, HCI-T, DOWNLIGHT, T-5

9 Average Light Power Density Level Watt/m2 14.3110.76

4.80 - 12.00ASHRAE 90.1-2007

NZEB / EE Showcases

10 Average Office Plug Load Level Watt/m2 12.67 < 5.00 NZEB / EE Showcases

10 P k L d/Off P k L d C t E % 13 23%10 Peak-Load/Off-Peak-Load Cost Expences % 13.23%

11 Air Conditioning System (DX System):5 Units

Indoor Unit ( total number: 25) COP 2.56 – 2.802.96

3.50 - 6.50ASHRAE 90.1-2007

VRV/VRF System

12 Air Conditioning Type : Split Unit EER 08 – 0913.00

17.75ASHRAE 90.1-2007

VRV/VRF System

13 Typical Zone Temperature oC 24 – 27 25 + 2 SNI

14 Typical Zone Relative Humidity % 35 – 65 60 + 10 SNI

15 Total Cooling Capacity of Central Air Conditioning Ton.Ref 112,49 25

NO TYPE OF LOADS kW %

1 Air Conditioning System 125.43 40.23%

2 Lift 66 21.17%

3 Lighting System 43.5 13.95%

4 Plug Loads 34.67 11.12%

5 Ground Water Pump 24 7.70%

6 Computer 12.55 4.02%

7 Others 5.67 1.82%

Total 311.82 100 % 26

Page 14: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

14

Measurement of Chipper Motor:6 000 V 203 A cos=0 6356.000 V, 203 A, cos=0,635

Improvement of cos 0.9:kVARc 648,56 kVARc

Energy Saving:– Operating Time 2400 hours / year

{(1.629,69) x 2400 - (0,65 x 1.339,6 x 2400)} x Rp. 114,-

= Rp.238,23 Mill,-/yrp , , y– Transformer losses 5%, operating time 2400

hours / yr

{1-(0,635/0,9)2} x 5% x 1339,6 x 2400 x Rp. 109,-

= Rp. 8,84 Mill,-/yru PLN tariff 1994

1.629,69 kVAR

Daya Resistif (Watt)

1.339,6 kW

27

Other plant 1800 kW

G3

G2

G12700 kVA

472A; 3.3 kV 1000 kVA; 3150 kVA/380 V; 183/1519 A

UTILITY 1- 405 kW/ 0.84

UTILITY 2 - 394 kW/ 0.83

SPINNING - 620 kW/ 0.82

POLYMER 248 kW/ 0 59

460OC

438OC

430OC

G4 Capacitors2 x 500 kVAR

STRETCHING - 415 kW/ 0.81

SOURCE WTR - 26 kW/ 0.80

TURBO REFRIG. - 220 kW

POLYMER - 248 kW/ 0.59

403OC

430 C

28

Page 15: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

15

Other plant 1800 kW

Recovering of Waste Heat Energy

Cost saving Rp.297,230,000,-/y - Pay back period 1.6 years

WHRB

430OCG3

G2

G12700 kVA

472A; 3.3 kV 1000 kVA; 3150 kVA/380 V; 183/1519 A

UTILITY 1- 405 kW/ 0.84

UTILITY 2 - 394 kW/ 0.83

SPINNING - 620 kW/ 0.82

POLYMER 248 kW/ 0 59

438OC

460OC9 bar1.25 T/h

9 bar1 25 T/h

WHRB

WHRB

430 C

G4 Capacitors2 x 500 kVAR

STRETCHING - 415 kW/ 0.81

SOURCE WTR - 26 kW/ 0.80

TURBO REFRIG. - 220 kW

POLYMER - 248 kW/ 0.59

403OC

Steam line to process

1.25 T/h

29

flue gas

steam

Ms (kg/s)P (b )

Mu (kg/s)T (oC)CO2 (%)O2 (%)CO (ppm)

Mu (kg/s)T (oC)CO2 (%)O2 (%)CO (ppm)

Simple cost benefit ratio after implementing ADDMF technology :

Boiler capacity 1.6 Ton/hour

BURNER

BOILER

ECONOMIZER

CHIMNEY

fuel in

Mf (kg/s)

Me (kg/s)

P (bar)T (oC)

CO (ppm) CO (ppm)

Boiler performance status 65% (total efficiency)

Operating hour 12 - 20 hours/day

Fuel consumption 180,000 litres ADO /year = Rp. 99,000,000,-/year

Maintenance cost (cleaning, overhauling, etc.) Rp. 4,500,000,-/year

Chemical component costs

(softener, resin, salt, chemical injection compound, etc.) Rp. 2,000,000,-/year

F l t (ADO) i ft d i 1 i l t ti

ADDMF

combustion air

blowdown water feed water feed water

Ma (kg/s)Tdb (oC)Twb (oC)

Mb (kg/s)Tdb (oC)Twb (oC)

( g )T(oC)

Me (kg/s)T(oC)

Fuel cost (ADO) saving after during 1 year implementation,

10% x 180.000 litres x Rp. 550,- /litre =Rp. 9,900,000,- /year

Reduction cost for maintenance Rp. 4,000,000,- /year

Reduction cost for chemical compounds Rp. 2,000,000,- /year

Total cost saving = Rp. 15,900,000,- /year

The cost of ADDMF equipment Rp. 18,000,000,- the pay back period of theimplementation of the equipment is about 1.1 year.

30

Page 16: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

16

jacket

coolingtower

waterHE

[-44%]

40UNITS

WHRB[-83%]

38UNITS

18UNITS

100UNITS

generator

[ -90%]31

UNITS35

UNITS

engine

[ 35-45%]

31

menara pendingin

unit pengolah udara (AHU)

Tic(oC) Tdu(oC)Twu(oC)Mu(kg/s)

Toc(oC)T ds (o C)T ( C) M (k / )

Tdf(oC)Twf(oC)

/

pompa

evaporator

kondensor

motor-kompresorkatup expansi

Wc(kW)Mc(kg/s )

Pc(bar)TC(oC)

Pe(bar)Te(oC)

Pk(bar)Tk(oC)

Two(oC)

Twi(oC)

T ws (o C) , Ms (k g/ s)

Tdr(oC)Twr(oC)Mr(kg/s)

Mf(kg/s)

Tdm(oC)Twm(oC)RH(%)

Wm(kW)

pompa

evaporator

unit koil kipas(FCU)

Mw(kg/s)Ww(kW)

toto/konser.hfx

3232

Page 17: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

17

Measure , Record & Calculate

179oC

FuelBoiler400kg/hr

APH

5200kg/hr,120oC

Flue gas320oC

stack

Steamprocess

179 C

Condensatereturn

uetank 30oC

30oC

Feed water Tank520 kg.hr

4680kg/hr

10% makeup water

Air

33

Perbandingan Konsumsi daya dan masa kembalinya investasiJumlah titik lampu tetap Jumlah titik lampu berubah

No deskripsi Kondisi awal konvensional Electronics konvensional Electronicsballast ballast ballast ballastballast ballast ballast ballast

1 Jumlah titik lampu 9 9 9 6 62 Jumlah lampu/armatur 4 3 3 4 43 Tipe lampu TLD18W/54 TLD18W/84 TLD18W/84 TLD18W/84 TLD18W/844 Tipe ballast konvensional konvensional elektronik konvensional elektronik5 Jumlah ballast 2 2 1 2 16 Total daya (watt) 828 666 504 552 4327 Kuat penerangan (lux) 338 538 538 512 5128 Penghematan daya/thn (kWh) - 801 1562,4 1331,3 1910,19 Penghematan biaya/thn(Rp) - 160.200,00 312.480,00 226.260,00 382.020,00

10 Investasi (Rp)a. Ballast 13.500,00 13.500,00 75.000,00 13.500,00 75.000,00b. Starter + holder 4.500,00 3.500,00 - 4.500,00 -c. Capasitor 7.500,00 7.500,00 - 7.500,00 -d. TLD 12.000,00 18.000,00 18.000,00 24.000,00 24.000,00e. Armatur kosong 110.000,00 100.000,00 100.000,00 120.000,00 120.000,00

11 Investasi per unit (Rp) 147.500,00 142.500,00 193.000,00 169.000,00 219.000,0012 Total investasi (Rp) 1.327.500,00 1.282.500,00 1.737.000,00 1.017.000,00 1.314.000,0013 Tambahan investasi (Rp) - -45.000,00 409.500,00 -310.500,00 -13.500,0013 Masa pengembalian (thn) - murah&hemat 1,3 murah&hemat murah&hemat14 Prioritas pilihan 2 4 1 3

34

Page 18: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

18

Sebelum Retrofit Sesudah RetrofitItem Rata2 Maks. Min. Dev.

Std.Keterangan Rata2 Maks. Min. Dev

Std

Kinerja Chiller PengukuranKinerja Chiller Pengukuran(08.45 -16.22)

(07.29 -15.52)1. Daya Kompresi (kW) 68.98

74.1677.2480.55

65.4467.94

4.283.07

60.0560.80

64.4664.50

55.4453.01

1.961.96

2. Beban Pendinginan(kW)

159.24176.89

179.58196.04

143.66152.34

11.616.70

243.45230.85

266.97247.82

217.89211.90

8.217.57

3. COP 2.302.39

2.572.75

2.242.17

0.120.19

4.063.80

4.744.39

3.753.46

0.140.15

4. Suhu Udara Ambient(oC)

28.8529.76

31.6133.93

26.3225.85

1.202.08

28.8429.85

31.8732.48

25.5125.85

1.261.43

5. Temp. Input ChilledWater (oC)

15.7916.21

22.4120.25

12.8712.73

1.741.17

17.3017.62

18.4723.49

13.3214.82

1.321.49Water ( C)

6. Temp. Output ChilledWater (oC)

10.4710.33

16.8514.42

7.867.32

1.611.14

9.179.91

10.3516.04

6.007.48

1.091.35

Kinerja Chiller diukurdari Beban AHU

Peng. sesaat10/03/1999

22/03/19991. Beban Pendinginan

(kW)150.30 164.74

2. COP 2.24 2.77

35

No Item Unit Jan Feb Maret April

1 Total Kamar kamar 150 150 150 150

2 Kamar Terjual kamar 2410 2160 2805 2715

3 Tingkat Hunian % 77 70 93 96

4 Konsumsi Listrik Perbulan

kWh 381.000 288.000 348.000 306.000

5 Biaya Listrik Rp/Bl 242.328.744 195.679.632 268.366.400 158.652.000

6 Konsumsi/Kmr Terjual

kWh/Kmr 158 133 124 113j

7 Biaya Listrik/Kmr Terjual

Rp/ Kmr 100.551 90.592 95.674 58.435

8 Total Revenue Rp 1.268.000.000 1.165.000.000 1.489.000.000 1.454.000.000

9 % Listrik thd Revenue

% 19 17 18 11

36

Page 19: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

19

No Measures Avg Savings (% of Total Electrical Consumption)

B ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

1 Raise Power Factor 5.1

2 Lower excess transformer capacity 3.3

C LIGHTING

1 Lower Lighting Wattage 1.6

2 Reduce lighting hours 2.8

D ENVELOPE MODIFICATIONS

1 Lower window-wall ratio 12.7

2 Install double glazed windows 2.1

3 Installation, infiltration, roof absorbtion 0.8

E ELEVATORS

1 Eliminate 1-floor elevator trips 0.2

37

No ActionAverage Saving % of Energy Consumption

Boilers

1. Boiler Tune Up 2 – 3 %o e u e Up 3 %

2. Reduce Operating Pressure 1 – 5 %

3. Install Preheater 4 – 7 %

4. Install Economizer 4 – 7 %

5. Recover Heat from Condensate 3 – 15 %

6. Minimize Radiation Heat Loss 1 %

7. Select Optimum Steam Pressure 1 %

8. Control Heat Using Instrument 1 %

9. Clean Heating Surface 1 %

Diesel Generators

1. Waste Heat Recovery 5 – 25 %

2. Fuel Additive 1 – 3 %

3. Fuel Preheating 1 %

Electrical Power Systems

1. Raise Power Factor 5 – 6 %

2. Electrical Balance Loads 1 – 5 %

3. Lower Excess Transformer Capacity 3 – 3.5%

38

Page 20: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

20

No Measures Avg Savings (% of Total Electrical Consumption)

A AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM

1 Install VAV controls 12.6

2 Install Heat Exchanger for incoming air 12.0

3 Install high efficiency chillers 9.6

4 Maintain clean AHU filters, cooling coils 7.2

5 Minimize outdoor air intake 6.0

6 Optimize multiple chiller operation 4.9

7 Raise A/C condenser temperature 4.1

8 Replace Over-sized electrical motor 3.8

9 Raise set point to 25.5o C 3.6

10 Relocate offices to lower cooling load 3.0

11 Modify airflow to condenser 2.8

12 Reduce A/C equipment run time 2.3

13 Install variable speed pumps 1.6

14 Install small A/C for separate space 1.3

15 Install high efficiency pumps 1.3

39

Low cost/no cost investmentMedium cost investmentHigh cost investment

40

Page 21: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

21

41

42

Page 22: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

22

43

Luas lantai (ft2)

BTU/jam

Tembok tebal Tembok biasa

100125150175200250300

4.5505.1505.7006.2006.5007.5508 300

5.3006.1006.8007.5008.1009.300

10 400300400500

8.3009.70011.000

10.40012.40014.250

1 ft1 ft22 = 0,09290 m= 0,09290 m22 1 BTU = 3142 kWh1 BTU = 3142 kWh 1 BTU/j = 3142 kW1 BTU/j = 3142 kW

Koreksi : Koreksi : dinding ke timur = 0,95 dinding ke timur = 0,95 LangitLangit--langit > 3 m = 1,1 Ruang teduh = 0,8langit > 3 m = 1,1 Ruang teduh = 0,8

44

Page 23: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

23

45

Basic Electrical Parameters in AC &DC systems –Voltage (V) Current (I)

RPMAir VelocityN i d Vib tiVoltage (V), Current (I),

Power factor (cos ), Active power (kW), Maximum demand (kVA), Reactive power (kVAr), Energy consumption (kWh), Frequency (Hz), Harmonics, etc. Temperature & Heat Flow

Noise and VibrationDust ConcentrationTDSPHMoisture ContentRelative HumidityFlue Gas Analysis – CO2, O CO SO NO

Temperature & Heat FlowRadiationAir and Gas FlowLiquid Flow

O2, CO, SOx, NOx

Combustion EfficiencySteam trap analyzerInfra-Red Thermography

46

Page 24: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

24

C:\Document\Totok\PT. Narama Mandiri 2011

47

C:\Document\Totok\PT. Narama Mandiri 2011

48

Page 25: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

25

C:\Document\Totok\PT. Narama Mandiri 2011

49

C:\Document\Totok\PT. Narama Mandiri 2011

50

Page 26: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

26

C:\Document\Totok\PT. Narama Mandiri 2011

51

C:\Document\Totok\PT. Narama Mandiri 2011

52

Page 27: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

27

C:\Document\Totok\PT. Narama Mandiri 2011

53

C:\Document\Totok\PT. Narama Mandiri 2011

54

Page 28: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

28

C:\Document\Totok\PT. Narama Mandiri 2011

55

C:\Document\Totok\PT. Narama Mandiri 2011

56

Page 29: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

29

C:\Document\Totok\PT. Narama Mandiri 2011

57

C:\Document\Totok\PT. Narama Mandiri 2011

58

Page 30: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

30

1

IR - I0000000.035

189.6 °C

1501

2

3

4

24/10/96 1:59:51 PM

-62.4

-50

0

50

100

150

0.1

0.6 170.0

-50

0

50

100

150

0.6

0.5

1.6

3.4

9.6

13.2

43.3

21.5

4.8

1.4

0.0

155.0

140.0

125.0

110.0

95.0

80.0

65.0

50.0

35.0

20.0

C:\Document\Totok\PT. Narama Mandiri 2011

59

IR - I0000000.018

89.4 °C

70

80

70

80

IR - I0000000.029

40.0 °C0.0

0.0 40.0

23/10/96 2:23:29 PM

27.2

30

40

50

60

70

30

40

50

60

70

24/10/96 10:55:32 AM

15.015

20

25

30

35

400.0

0.0

0.1

4.8

6.2

8.7

10.0

16.2

50.7

3.4

0.0

37.5

35.0

32.5

30.0

27.5

25.0

22.5

20.0

17.5

15.0

C:\Document\Totok\PT. Narama Mandiri 2011

60

Page 31: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

31

C:\Document\Totok\PT. Narama Mandiri 2011

61

EnergyEnergylosses

Energy waste

Useful energy

gyinput

62

Page 32: Case Studies Energy Audit ( Ir. Totok Sulistiyanto, M.Eng.Sc)

1/18/2011

32

Buildings Nation Globe

• Reduced energy bills• Increased

Competitiveness

• Reduced energy imports• Avoided costs can be used

for poverty reduction

• Reduced GWP impacts• Reduced GHG and

th i iCompetitiveness• Increased productivity• Improved quality• Increased profits !

for poverty reduction • Conservation of limited

resources• Improved energy security

other emissions• Maintains a sustainable

environment

63

Thank YouS

TerimakasihMatur Nuwun

DankeDankeSpasiboSpasibo

XieXie xiexie

Salamat PoShukriya Aabhar

Arigatou Gozaimasu

Prepared by:Prepared by:

Totok SulistiyantoTotok Sulistiyanto

XieXie--xiexie

64