Capital Program Committee FY 18 Q2 Capital Spending Update€¦ · 6/2/2018 · • Summary...
Transcript of Capital Program Committee FY 18 Q2 Capital Spending Update€¦ · 6/2/2018 · • Summary...
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
Capital Program Committee
FY 18 Q2 Capital Spending Update
February 6, 2018
2
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
• Summary Overview
• FY 18 Q2 Actuals Compared to Plan
• Capital Planning Improvement Project
• Questions
• Appendix: FY 18 Capital Spending by Division
FY 2018 Q2 Capital Program Overview
Table of Contents
3
$ millions
Aero
IT
Rail
RMV
Transit
Chapter 90
OTP, etc.
Highway
Aero IT Rail RMV Transit Chapter 90 OTP, etc. Highway
FY18 $51.0 $18.4 $115.4 $44.2 $73.2 $200.0 $64.5 $1,272.4
FY19 -FY22 $242.1 $79.4 $352.6 $65.4 $147.6 $800.0 $256.4 $5,206.4
FY18
FY19 -FY22
$320.9M
$1,000.0M
$220.8M
$109.6M
$468.0M
$97.8M
$293.1M
$6,478.8M
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
MassDOT FY18 – FY22 Capital Investment Plan forecasts $9.0B in capital
spending (excluding MBTA) over the next five years
Summary Overview
4
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
MassDOT Capital Spending1 FY 2014 – FY 2017 and Q2 Comparison
FY 2018 MassDOT Capital Program – Q2 Spending Report
1Excludes spending related to REP funds for MBTA projects and pass through spending (UMass Boston and Harbor Dredging).
• Overall capital spending slightly behind FY 17 Q2 spending (<4%) − FY 18 Chapter 90 spending is less than same period spending in FY 17
− ABP program is nearing completion with fewer active projects and associated spending
FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 FY 17 Q2 FY 18 Q2 FY 17
Other DOT $152 $836 $469 $258 $110 $70
Highway $1,387 $1,055 $1,404 $1,495 $669 $717
Chapter 90 $189 $211 $224 $230 $77 $102
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$ m
illio
ns
Historical Capital Spending and Q2 Comparison
5
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
MassDOT Capital Monthly Spending Trend1 for FY 2018 compared to FY 2017
FY 2018 MassDOT Capital Program – Q2 Spending Report
1Excludes spending related to REP funds for MBTA projects and pass through projects.
• Capital spending closely tracked FY 17 spending trend through November; slightly behind in
December Chapter 90 spending was slow to start as compared to FY 17
New 10 year Chapter 90 contract with each City and Town executed in Fall
July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Close
FY 17 Actual $11 $129 $184 $202 $180 $192 $134 $109 $128 $101 $159 $194 $270
FY 18 Actual $7 $143 $179 $201 $187 $139
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$ m
illio
ns
Capital Spending by Month FY 18 vs FY 17
$856M YTD Spending
$1,993M in FY 2017
6
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
• Bond cap spending for Chapter 90 continues to reflect delay in set up of new contracts in MMARs;
projected spending anticipated to be close to plan
• Highway construction spending <2% behind FY 17 Q2; mix of non-bond cap project-related spending
sources is reflected in YTD bond cap spending compared to FY 17 (e.g. pay-go capital (tolls), ABP
funds)
• Rail and Transit spending focused on existing projects including new PVTA maintenance facility in
Springfield and SGR projects; ahead of FY 17 Q2 spending
• RMV, IT, Aeronautics, and Planning & Enterprise Services all on track with prior year Q2 spending
FY 2018 bond cap spending is on track with prior year same period spending
FY 2018 MassDOT Capital Program – Q2 Spending Report
Aero Transit Rail RMV IT OTP
FY 18 Q2 $1.0 $14.5 $17.4 $15.6 $3.5 $3.9
FY 17 Q2 $2.1 $5.4 $15.3 $11.9 $3.9 $3.0
FY 18 Plan $10.6 $66.1 $75.5 $44.2 $18.4 $17.3
$0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80
$ m
illio
ns
State Bond Cap FY 18 Q2 vs FY 17 Q2 Actuals and FY 18 Plan
$76.8
$148.3 $102.1
$183.9 $200.0
$340.7
$0.0
$100.0
$200.0
$300.0
$400.0
Chapter 90 Highway
State Bond Cap FY 18 Q2 vs FY 1 Q2 Actuals and FY 18 Plan ($000's)
FY 18 Q2 FY 17 Q2 FY 18 Plan
7
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
Enterprise-Wide PMIS
Implementation
8
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
• Completed discovery stage of our capital improvement process across MassDOT and
MBTA utilizing a team from Aurigo in December
• Aurigo currently working with both the Aeronautics Division and MassDOT’s Federal
Aid Programming and Reimbursement Office (FAPRO)
− Aeronautics scope is focused on implementing the project management module of the Aurigo
Masterworks platform to improve project controls and manage delivery of their capital program
− FAPRO scopes involves automation of the federal aid programming and reimbursement
processes
Integration with the development of the STIP will be incorporated into the CIP Planning scope
• Discovery for capital planning process for three month effort focused on:
− Documentation of the “as is” capital planning processes undertaken by MassDOT and MBTA
− Deep dive of the capital planning and STIP development process in the highway division
• Key deliverable is a business requirement document for the implementation of Aurigo’s
capital planning module for MassDOT and the MBTA
− Requirements include interfaces required to align/link with the MBTA’s e-builder implementation,
MMARS, and highway’s existing data management systems (Project Info, etc.)
MassDOT-wide Capital planning improvement discovery process completed
FY 2018 MassDOT Capital Program – Q2 Spending Report
9
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
• Questions?
FY 2018 MassDOT Capital Program – Q1 Spending Report
10
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
Appendix
FY 2018 Capital Spending by
Division
11
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
Aeronautics Division
FY 2018 Capital Spending Report
12
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
• Q2 spending is significantly ahead due to a lag in FAA flow through payments from FY 2017
• FAA grant awards are estimated during the CIP process and not known until May 1st of any given
year; FAA holds final payments until 90% of project completed
− FAA has 4 years to close out a project and make final payments
− Spending through Q2 includes FAA payments related to closeout of Lawrence Airport runway project
(completed in FY 2017)
− FAA grants issued in Q2 with minimal construction spending prior to winter shutdown
• Q2 includes spending for the design phase of airport infrastructure projects
FY 2018 Q2 for Aeronautics is ahead of FY 2017 Q2 Actuals
FY 2018 Aeronautics Division Capital Program
125%
71%
143%
72%
37%
97%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
SFY 14 SFY 15 SFY 16 SFY 17 SFY 18 SFY 14 - SFY 17 Ave.
Percentage Actual FY 18 Spending YTD vs Plan/Previous
Years Actuals/Plan Aeronautics Division
13
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
Highway Division
FY 2018 Capital Spending Report
14
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
• Highway achieved 51.1% of its total capital plan through Q2
• Expenditures on construction phase activities achieved 50% of the total budget
for Q2
• All-electronic tolling completion achieved full beneficial use; contract closeout
is ongoing
• Bridge program spending is 53% of plan through Q2
− Significant spending on major ABP projects (e.g. Whittier, Fore River, Longfellow,
Woods Memorial bridges)
• Construction spending is trending similar to FY 2017
• Highway is projected to spend 95% of the FY 2018 capital plan
FY 2018 Q2 capital spending
FY 2018 Highway Division Capital Program
15
$72.2
$429.5
$36.7
$95.6
$90.2
$42.7
$35.6
$23.0
$62.7
$425.1
$38.8
$101.6
$89.2
$36.5
$54.5
$38.3
$0.0 $50.0 $100.0 $150.0 $200.0 $250.0 $300.0 $350.0 $400.0 $450.0 $500.0
AETs
Bridge
Facilities
Interstate pavement
Non-interstate pavement
Roadway improvements
Safety improvements
Tunnels
Millions
SFY2018 Budget
SFY2018 Projected
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
Budget compared to projections for all reliability programs a/o December 2017
FY 2018 Highway Division Capital Program
16
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
Budget compared to projections for all modernization and expansion programs a/o December 2017
FY 2018 Highway Division Capital Program
17
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
Budget compared to actuals for other CIP programs through Q2. These programs do not project
spending; actuals year to date are provided for reference.
FY 2018 Highway Division Capital Program
18
$965
$834
$977
$1,1
43
$1,2
49
$1,1
35
$204
$179
$203
$282 $224
$236
$12
$63
$79 $90
$66 $114
$109
$131
$142 $155
$143
$32
$39
$40
$28 $23
$21 $172
$152
$153
$13
$12
$15
$0.00
$200.00
$400.00
$600.00
$800.00
$1,000.00
$1,200.00
$1,400.00
$1,600.00
$1,800.00
$2,000.00
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Mill
ion
s
Construction Local aid Maintenance Professional services Land acquisition
Equipment and materials Intergovernmental Administrative Compensation and benefits
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
FY 2018 Highway Division Capital Program
Fiscal and Highway Division are piloting new expense categories that provide additional detail on capital and operating expenditures within the division.
19
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
Cumulative construction expenditures are trending similar to last year. There is less than
a 2% difference between SFY 2018 and SFY 2017 expenditures year to date.
FY 2018 Highway Division Capital Program
20
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
• Chapter 90 is on target to spend the $200 million authorized by the Legislature for FY 2018
• Spending through Q2 is behind SYF 16 and SFY 17 primarily due to slower ramp up in contract spending and
implementation of new 10 year contracts for each City and/or town
FY 18 Q2 capital spending comparison for Chapter 90
FY 2018 Highway Division Capital Program
94.5% 70.3%
111.8% 115.1%
38.4%
94.8%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
140.0%
SFY 14 SFY 15 SFY 16 SFY 17 SFY 18 SFY 14 - SFY 17 Ave.
Percentage Actual Spending vs Annual Plan/Previous Years Actuals Chapter 90 Program
21
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
Planning & Enterprise Services
FY 2018 Capital Spending Report
22
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
• FY 18 includes spending for statewide transportation projects, Metropolitan Planning Organizations,
interagency agreements, security, facilities and shared services related to capital
• Spending reflects work on studies highlighted in the CIP such as:
− MA Freight Plan which will be completed by end of Q3; plan is compliant with FAST Act
− Draft Statewide Rail Plan released for public comment (January 2018); is expected to be complete mid-March
− Statewide Climate Adaptation and Vulnerability Assessment
− Focus40: 25-year capital investment plan for the MBTA to meet needs of Greater Boston Region in 2040
FY 18 Q2 capital spending comparison – 46.1% of Plan
FY 2018 Planning & Enterprise Services Capital Program
79.8% 92.1%
119.1% 112.7%
46.1%
88.7%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
140.0%
SFY 14 SFY 15 SFY 16 SFY 17 SFY 18 SFY 14 - SFY 17 Ave.
Percentage Actual FY 18 Spending YTD vs Previous Years Actuals/ Plan
23
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
Rail and Transit Division
FY 2018 Capital Spending Report
24
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
• Rail achieved 32.7% of its FY 18 plan (excluding SCR) which reflects increased capital maintenance
costs related to reimbursements to private railroads for costs incurred
• IRAP program spending spent 24% of the plan through Q2
• $4.4 million in FHWA reimbursements for Section 130 grade crossings through Q2 (61% of plan)
• Project management costs related to South Coast Rail Project totaled $4.6 million through Q2
FY 2018 Q2 capital spending comparison 22.9% of Plan
FY 2018 Rail Capital Program
77.6%
203.2%
267.3%
85.1% 22.9%
139.7%
0.0%
50.0%
100.0%
150.0%
200.0%
250.0%
300.0%
SFY 14 SFY 15 SFY 16 SFY 17 SFY 18 SFY 14- SFY 17 Ave.
Percentage Actual FY 18 Spending YTD vs Previous Year Actuals/Plan Rail Program
25
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
• FY 18 Q2 spending reflects reimbursements to the RTAs (state match); does not include
any federal grant spending for RTAs; majority of plan spending occurs in Q3 and Q4 related
to long lead equipment purchases
• Spending for the PVTA maintenance facility totaled $13.4 million through Q2
FY 2018 Q2 capital spending comparison – 21.9% of overall Plan
FY 2018 Transit Capital Program
*FY 16 spending reflects
additional support provided by
MassDOT to meet a $2,672,724
increase in environmental
remediation costs associated
with WRTA’s Maintenance
Facility (40 Quinsigamond
Avenue).
166.8%
113.9%
170.3%
78.0%
21.9%
116.5%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
140.0%
160.0%
180.0%
SFY 14 SFY 15 SFY 16 SFY 17 SFY 18 SFY 14 - SFY 17 Ave.
Percentage Actual FY 18 Spending YTD vs Previous Years Actuals/Plan
Transit Program
26
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
RMV and IT
FY 2018 Capital Spending Report
27
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
• RMV spending reflects planned expenditures related to refurbishments at RMV facilities
expansion of service alternatives (kiosks), AAA licensing stations and ATLAS − Work underway at Leominster, Wilmington, & Plymouth RMV facilities
− RMV services now offered at 33 AAA locations
• FY 18 plan includes $42.1 million related to FAST enterprises for ATLAS (core system
replacement and Real ID)
− Q2 spending for ATLAS was 37% of plan
− Ability to comply with federal Real ID requirements included in Release 1 (March 2018)
FY 2018 Q2 capital spending comparison – 35.2% of Plan
FY 2018 RMV Capital Program
38.8% 214.2% 33.4% 77.5%
35.2% 51.3%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
SFY 14 SFY 15 SFY 16 SFY 17 SFY 18 SFY 14-SFY 17 Ave.
Percentage Actual FY 18 Spending YTD vs Previous Years Actuals/Plan
$42.1
$1.6
$0.5
$0.0 $10.0 $20.0 $30.0 $40.0 $50.0
ATLAS
Customer Svc. Modern.
Kiosks
ATLAS Customer Svc.
Modern. Kiosks
YTD Actuals $15.6 $0.3 $0.0
Budget $42.1 $1.6 $0.5
FY 2018: Modernization Program YTD Actuals vs Budget ($ millions)
28
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
• IT capital spending programs continue to focus on efficiencies in how we do business, process
improvements and investments that generate operational savings
• IT spent $3.5 million through Q2 in FY 2018; comparable spending for FY 2017 was $3.7 million
FY 2018 Q2 capital spending comparison – 18.9% of Plan
FY 2018 IT Capital Program
$0.0 $0.5 $1.0 $1.5 $2.0 $2.5 $3.0 $3.5 $4.0
Reliability Modernization Desktop
Experience Digital
Infrastructure Asset
Management Cyber/Info.
Security Enterprise, BPR
& Auto. Customer
Digital Exp. Workforce
Productivity
YTD Actuals $0.5 $0.6 $0.6 $0.1 $0.2 $0.4 $1.1
Budget $1.7 $3.8 $2.8 $1.6 $3.6 $2.2 $2.8
FY 2018: Reliability and Modernization programs actuals YTD vs budget
29
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
Commonwealth Projects
FY 2018 Capital Spending Report
30
Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only
• UMass Boston expenditures have achieved 100% of the five year plan ($75 million)
• Harbor Dredging project received approval from the Army Corp of Engineers and
Massport has drawn down the planned Commonwealth funds for FY 2018
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
SFY 16 SFY 17 SFY 18 SFY 14 - SFY 18 Total
FY Plan vs FY Actual Spending ($000's) for Commonwealth Project
- UMass Boston
FY Actuals FY Plan
100% 100% 100%
$75M
UMass Boston & Harbor Dredging both achieved FY 2018 planned spending
FY 2018 Commonwealth Projects Capital Program
35,000 30,000 30,000
95,000 5,000
30,000
35,000
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
SFY 16 SFY 17 SFY 18 SFY 14 - SFY 18 Total
FY Plan vs FY Actual Spending (000's) for Commonwealth Project - Harbor Dredging
FY Plan FY Actuals
36.8%
14.3% 0%
100%