Calibration Fundamentals

download Calibration Fundamentals

of 39

description

Calibration Fundamentals

Transcript of Calibration Fundamentals

  • Calibration

    Fundamentals

    An

    Introduction to

    Metrology

    Presented by Jol Rameaux

    Service & Support Unit

    Agilent Technologies Europe

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    1

  • October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    2

    Calibration Fundamentals Todays topics

    Theres much more beneath the surface !

    Contents

    Metrology definition Measurements

    confidence

    What is calibration? Cal comparison Iceberg ahead ! How to calibrate Calibration of Agilent

    equipment

    Errors and uncertainty Summary

    An

    Introduction

    to Metrology

  • The Importance of Measurement Metrology is the science of measurement

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    3

    British scientist Lord Kelvin (William Thomson

    1824-1907) is quoted from his lecture to the

    Institution of Civil Engineers, 3 May 1883...

    "I often say that when you can measure what you are

    speaking about and express it in numbers you know

    something about it;

    but when you cannot express it in numbers your

    knowledge is a meagre and unsatisfactory kind"

    You cannot manage what you cannot measure. HP co-founder Bill Hewlett

  • Metrology : Wiki Definition

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    4

    Metrology is the science of measurement.

    Metrology includes all theoretical and practical aspects

    of measurement. Applied metrology concerns the application of measurement

    science to manufacturing and other processes and their use in

    society, ensuring the suitability of measurement instruments,

    their calibration and quality control of measurements. Although

    the emphasis is on the measurements themselves, traceability

    of the calibration of the measurement devices is necessary to

    ensure confidence in the measurements.

    Metrologist : Perform metrology

  • The Need for Good Measurement

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    5

    We all make and use measurements

    every day How much fuel will I get? What weight of fruit does the pie need? Will this nut fit the bolt? Does your mobile phone reliably connect to any network? Which drug is most effective? What is the time?

    We have expectations

    about the correctness of

    these measurements

  • What are Specifications? Define a products expected performance

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    6

    An example using a familiar product

    Manufacturers view

    Frequency: 900 MHz

    Channel spacing: 200 kHz

    Max power: 2 W

    Rate/Modulation: 270 kbps/GMSK

    Sensitivity: -97 dBm

    etc.

    Reason: Conforms with legal criteria (safety, interference); compatible with

    operators networks.

    Consumers view Reception quality

    Reason: Can hear clearly when driving(*) a

    car, while in an elevator

    or walking through an

    underpass.

    (*) Via Bluetooth hands-free, of course!

  • Why Measure?

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    7

    We take measurements to get information about the

    manufactured or used product so that we can make

    good decisions.

    Measure the product

    to see if it conforms

    with specs or

    requirements

    We have a

    good product Yes

    But how do we know our

    measurement tools are

    giving good results?

    No

    Does it

    comply?

    Measurement decisions

    are made during:

    Research Product development Production Final testing Operation

  • Measurement Confidence

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    8

    Measurements are made using a wide variety of

    instruments, ranging from very simple to extremely

    sophisticated.

    We must have confidence that all those measuring

    instruments are giving valid, useful data.

    Because measured values are the basis of decisions.

    That confidence is provided by an

    effective program of calibration

  • Calibration Confidence

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    9

    Reference Equipment used during calibration should be

    calibrated and should match or exceed accuracy expectation.

    Procedures used during calibration should be clear, validated

    and repeatable.

    Measurement results should be given at minimum as a

    Pass/Fail result and preferably with measurement data and

    uncertainties associated

    Existing Traceability toward reference standards

    People should know what they are doing

    Preference should be given to automated calibration as it

    increases confidence in overall calibration procedure

  • So, what is calibration ? (1)

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    10

    A graphic illustration search Google Images for meal and see the variety

    Are they all identical ?

  • So, what is calibration ? (2) Definition

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    11

    Operation that, under specified conditions, in a first step establishes a relation between the quantity values with measurement

    uncertainties provided by measurement standards and corresponding

    indications with associated measurement uncertainties and, in a second

    step, uses this information to establish a relation for obtaining a

    measurement result from an indication.

    From the ISO/IEC Guide 99 : 2007 -- International Vocabulary of Metrology

    Or more simply...

    The process of comparing a device with unknown performance to measurement standards traceable to the SI units and with determined

    uncertainties to enable obtaining thereafter useful measurement results

    from the device.

    There is no detail on what should be done during calibration.

  • Calibration Provides Confidence

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    12

    Confidence that a devices past performance was valid and that its future performance will continue to be good within

    recommended calibration interval.

    Unacceptable past performance may necessitate customer alert and product recall.

    Due to drift, measuring equipment needs to be regularly calibrated to contain error to

    acceptable limits.

    Knowledge of the value of a calibrated parameter becomes less certain as time

    elapses since calibration.

    Some products require annual optimisation (adjustment) for high confidence of

    compliance in future.

    Time P

    ara

    mete

    r valu

    e

    Performance

    drift

    Calibration &

    adjustment

    Spec limit

    Calibration &

    adjustment

  • Verification, Calibration, Adjustment, Repair

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    13

    Specification Limit of normal equipment operation, defined by original manufacturer

    Verification Test versus specifications. Result is Pass or Fail. Verification should include a data report with failed points, if any, and possibly measurement uncertainty.

    Adjustment Mechanical or electrical tuning of equipment to bring it back within specifications.

    Adjustment can be done in case of Failed verification or Passed verification (adjust always equipment). Adjustment should include a as-received data report and a post-

    adjusted data report.

    Calibration Verification + Adjustment combined (if needed)

    Repair If equipment fail verification and cannot be adjusted, then unit is faulty and should be

    repaired. Adjustment is not a repair !

  • Calibration Performance

    Real data comparison MXG RF Digital Signal Generator

    No

    rma

    lize

    d M

    eas

    ure

    d V

    alu

    e

    Po

    wer

    An

    alo

    g

    Po

    we

    r

    Dig

    ita

    l

    Ha

    rmo

    nic

    Sp

    uri

    ou

    s

    Su

    b

    Ha

    rmo

    nic

    No

    n

    Ha

    rmo

    nic

    Dig

    ita

    l

    Mo

    du

    lati

    on

    10 M

    Hz

    Fre

    qu

    en

    cy

    W-C

    DM

    A

    Po

    we

    r

    Ou

    tpu

    t

    Po

    we

    r

    Max

    Min

    Max

    Min

    Ag

    ile

    nt

    Ca

    l N

    on

    -Ag

    ile

    nt

    Cal

    N5182A Dig

    ita

    l M

    od

    Po

    we

    r

    820 POINTS TESTED

    257 POINTS TESTED

  • Calibration Performance

    Real data comparison MXG RF Digital Signal Generator

    No

    rma

    lize

    d M

    eas

    ure

    d V

    alu

    e

    Po

    wer

    An

    alo

    g

    Po

    we

    r

    Dig

    ita

    l

    Ha

    rmo

    nic

    Sp

    uri

    ou

    s

    Su

    b

    Ha

    rmo

    nic

    No

    n

    Ha

    rmo

    nic

    Dig

    ita

    l

    Mo

    du

    lati

    on

    10 M

    Hz

    Fre

    qu

    en

    cy

    W-C

    DM

    A

    Po

    we

    r

    Ou

    tpu

    t

    Po

    we

    r

    Max

    Min

    Max

    Min

    Ag

    ile

    nt

    Ca

    l N

    on

    -Ag

    ile

    nt

    Cal

    N5182A Dig

    ita

    l M

    od

    Po

    we

    r

    Not measured (long or difficult tests)

  • Calibration -- The Iceberg Analogy

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    16

    The calibration certificate and

    measurement data report

    What the customer sees

  • Calibration -- The Iceberg Analogy More to it than meets the eye

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    17

    The calibration certificate and

    measurement data report

    What the customer sees

    What the customer doesnt see Calibration procedure, software

    Measurement adequacy

    Traceability

    Equipment recall system

    Records

    Labelling for identity & status

    Interval management

    Environment

    Supplier evaluation

    Technical competence

  • How to deliver Calibration? (1)

    Calibration is verifying instrument specifications by measuring actual performance

    using external lab standards [instruments] that in turn have better performance, and

    are traceable to International Standard (NIST, NPL, PTB and NMIJ).

    Agilent measures the actual

    performance of every warranted

    specification, for every installed

    option, every time using same

    procedure and including adjustments

    You need :

    - Systems/ETEs used as reference

    - To follow OEM recommendations

    - Appropriate Procedures

    - Trained People

    - Cal Laboratory

    - To archive results

  • How to deliver Calibration ? (2)

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    19

    Use OEM Calibration Labs

    Built your own cal lab

    Bring Cal Lab on your site(s)

    Mix of all above

  • How to deliver Calibration ? (3)

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    20

    TME Software Calibration Platform

    Check ETEs (reference) needed

    Check ETEs cal due date

    Compute uncertainties as a function of

    ETEs used

    Define tests to be run as a function of configuration (option, frequency, etc), test operator setup

    Give Pass/Fail summary and data reports with points out of specs

    Print clean data report

    Archive data and traceability

    Validated by Agilent (operation, data points, uncertainties)

  • Calibration of Agilent Equipment?

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    21

    Automatic Calibration with commercialy available software Reliable & Repeteable Automatic configuration check and uncertainty measurement Most new equipment

    Automatic Calibration with proprietary software Reliable & Repeteable Automatic configuration check and uncertainty measurement Older equipment

    Manual Calibration Rely on strickly following recommended test procedure Highly operator dependant Very old equipment, no computer interface

    No-Calibration required Accessories, cables, adapters

    30 %

    40 %

    20 %

    10 %

  • What Needs Calibrating?

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    22

    Any equipment used in incoming, final inspection, in-process or quality control (SPC), product calibration/testing.

    Equipment used to perform lengthy or costly machine set-up.

    Items whose indications impact upon controlled conditions (e.g. environment).

    Any situation where the failure costs are too high (safety, one off testing, etc).

    Equipment used in R&D where design decisions are made.

    Used during failure or returned material analysis, where critical determinations could be affected (including repair troubleshooting).

    Whenever someone acts upon an instrument's reading.

    Equipment used for calibration (traceability) of any of the equipment used in the above situations.

    In general, all equipment who are used as reference for other items

  • Error & Uncertainty

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    23

    Error is the result of a measured

    value minus the expected or

    nominal value of the quantity. The

    purpose of calibration is to

    determine the magnitude of (and

    possibly correct for) errors.

    Error is by how much we miss the

    target (i.e. the red bulls-eye).

    The dispersion (spread of shots)

    represents repeatability a component of uncertainty. Shots at a target

    another illustration of error

    Outlier

    Average

    error

    Negative

    error

    Positive

    error

    Expected

    value Measured

    value

    Measured

    value

  • Error, Precision & Accuracy

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    24

    Accurate and precise

    Precise but inaccurate Inaccurate and imprecise

    Quite accurate but imprecise

    Accurate = True

    Precise = Repeatable

    Note: In reality we need lots of

    data to determine the distribution

    (5 shots is not enough).

    Tru

    e v

    alu

    e

    Tru

    e v

    alu

    e

    Tru

    e v

    alu

    e

    Tru

    e v

    alu

    e

    Bad reference equipment

    Bad methodoloy

    Bad approach

    State of the art

  • Concepts of Uncertainty Example : How long is a piece of string?

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    25

    Contributors

    Tape measure

    Manufacturing tolerance

    Bent or stretched

    Temperature / humidity

    Graduation resolution

    String

    Lying straight / flat

    Under / Over-stretched

    Temperature / humidity

    Frayed ends

    Method & Personnel

    Lining-up string & tape measure

    Horizontal or vertical

    Repeatability

    Eye report on graduation

  • Concepts of Uncertainty Sources of error & uncertainty

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    26

    Measuring equipment

    Specifications inc. imported uncertainty (traceability)

    Readability

    Properties of the thing being measured

    Stability

    Sensitivity to input change

    Readability

    Measurement method

    Use of correctional data

    Configuration

    Data processing

    Operator skill

    Reaction time

    Manual dexterity

    Visual ability (meter parallax)

    Environment

    Temperature

    Humidity

    Altitude / Barometric pressure

    EMI

    Impedance effects

    Mismatch

    Loading (e.g. local / remote sensing)

    Cables and connections

    Torque

    Materials

    Cleanliness

    Mechanical stress

    Measurement non-repeatability

    Due to properties of the test equipment and unit-under-test and also the variable influences

    of test environment and operator.

    Mistakes !

    Cant be accounted for but can be statistically identified (outliers).

  • Uncertainty Example : Power sensor cal factor

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    27

    Erse

    te

    Mi

    Mt

    Ms

    MiKsKsKb

    2

    2

    ))(1(

    ))(1(

    2

    1)(

    Measurement equation

  • Uncertainty calculation for a device

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    28

    One spreadsheet/calculation to be created for each measurement setup and adjusted (uncertainty) for each measured point

    -> Give uncertainty per measured point

    -> Imply Pass/Fail criteria

    Same analysis to be done for each measurement point

    Same analysis to be done for each setup (alternate replacement)

    Remember the MXG : 820 measurement points for 10 performance

    setup ! Not including alternate ETEs analysis.

    -> This analysis and validation is the pure role of the metrologist

  • Basic Model for Product Specification Where does uncertainty fit in?

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    29

    Mean Production line

    test limit

    Production

    process

    distribution

    (manufacturing

    reproducibility)

    Production

    margin

    Calibration

    uncertainty

    Delta environment

    and drift

    Specification

    Guardband

    Time

    Para

    mete

    r valu

    e

    Performance

    drift

    Calibration &

    adjustment

    Spec limit

  • Calibration Intervals

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    30

    May be expressed as a calendar period, usually months or years

    between calibrations.

    Or might be an interval of usage time such as 1000 hours of operation.

    Or possibly the number of usage operations, especially mechanical

    items subject to degradation through

    wear.

    Although a manufacturer may recommend an interval (the spec

    implicitly has time dependency

    owing to expected drift), the

    equipment user is responsible for

    assigning the appropriate

    interval. Most of users follow

    manufacturers recommended CI

    Aim is to balance the cost of calibration (how often and the

    extent of the testing) with the

    risk of bad measurement (cost

    of product recall, safety, etc.)

    Better do a complete calibration every 3 years than a bad

    calibration every year

  • Calibration Summary What you need to remember

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    31

    Only manufacturer can define specs and what need to be tested.

    All calibration are not equivalent. Compare what is really done to have a complete picture : function, number of points and accuracy.

    Calibration certify past performance was correct and future performance is expected to be good

    Some calibrations can be done by yourselves, some cannot.

    Agilent is ready to help, in performing on-Site calibration for reduced down time and minimize risk in shipment

    You can tune calibration interval. It is your decision, but you should be able to justify in front of auditors.

    Metrology is really a specific and full time job reserved to specialists

    Any question : [email protected] or contact Boris at IBIS

  • Calibration Summary

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    32

    Questions ?

  • Calibration Summary

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    33

    Thanks for your attention !

  • Metrological [measurement] Traceability Definition

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    34

    Property of a measurement result whereby the result can be related to a reference through a documented unbroken chain of

    calibrations, each contributing to the measurement uncertainty.

    From the ISO/IEC Guide 99 : 2007 -- International Vocabulary of Metrology

    Or more simply as...

    A series of calibrations of known accuracy that link measurements to recognised standards through an

    unbroken chain of comparisons.

    The need for records is to link a product or service event to a process, status or time.

    If the process is measurement, detail about the equipment, procedure, test conditions and personnel are

    all relevant to demonstrating traceability.

  • Traceability International System of Units (SI units)

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    35

    http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/index.html

    Every measurement

    is linked to one or

    more of just 7 base

    units !

    The kilogramme is the

    only unit defined by a

    prototype (a specific physical item held at

    BIPM in Paris, France).

    Definitions (at NIST site)

  • Measurement Traceability A representation of the national measurement system

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    36

    NATIONAL

    METROLOGY INSTITUTE

    STANDARDS

    LABORATORY

    CAL FACILITY

    MANUFACTURING

    PRODUCT SPEC

    Uncertainty is the potential inaccuracy.

    The levels do not represent consistent values of uncertainty.

    Test uncertainty ratio (TUR) is the ratio of the unit-under-test's

    specification to the measurement uncertainty.

    Spec = 15%

    TUR 5:1

    Unc = 3%

    TUR 10:1

    Unc = 0.3%

    TUR 3:1

    Unc = 0.1%

    TUR 2.5:1

    Unc =

    0.04%

    NATIONAL

    REALISATION OF

    SI DEFINITION Unc =

    0.008% International

    comparisons

    via BIPM

    International

    comparisons

    via regional

    accreditation

    organisation

    Another

    stds lab

    Another

    cal lab And another

    Another

    production line

    Another

    factory And another

  • Traceability Why Bother? Summary

    Common measurement references are critical to the world-wide

    exchange and acceptance of

    products, services and technology.

    The aim is to transfer these references in a controlled manner

    to the billions of individual

    measurements made daily.

    Traceable measurements ensure uniformity of manufactured goods

    and industrial processes.

    It supports equity in trade, compliance to regulatory laws and

    standards.

    If the calibration paper trail was followed from the unit under test up

    through the working, reference and

    primary standards, it would

    eventually end at the record of an

    experiment made to establish the

    quantity in terms of one or more of

    the SI base units.

    It is essential to science and the development of technology.

    October 24, 2013 37

    Calibration Fundamentals

  • Recommended Resources (Free) Find out more

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    38

    NPL Good Practice On-line Modules on:

    Measurement http://www.npl.co.uk/publications/good-practice-online-modules/measurement/

    Uncertainty http://www.npl.co.uk/publications/good-practice-online-modules/measurement-uncertainty/

    NPL -- A Beginner's Guide to Uncertainty of Measurement http://resource.npl.co.uk/cgi-bin/download.pl?area=npl_publications&path_name=/npl_web/pdf/mgpg11.pdf

    UKAS M3003 -- The Expression of Uncertainty and Confidence in

    Measurement http://www.ukas.com/library/Technical-Information/Pubs-Technical-Articles/Pubs-List/M3003.pdf

  • In or Out-of-Spec?

    October 24, 2013

    Calibration Fundamentals

    39

    But it doesnt define how.

    Most accreditation bodies (all of Europes) stipulate ILAC-G8 which requires conformity limits are set at spec minus uncertainty.

    The US national implementation of 17025 is ANSI/NCSL-Z540.3 which

    accepts a producer/consumer shared-risk approach:

    The probability of false acceptance associated with any test point labelled Pass shall not exceed 2 %.

    Learn more at: http://www.agilent.com/metrology/ncsli2009_dobbert.shtml

    Measured values

    with plus and minus

    uncertainty bars

    Ideal

    value

    Specification

    limit A

    B C

    D E

    ISO/IEC 17025 clause 5.10.4.2 :

    When statements of compliance [with a specification] are made, the

    uncertainty of measurement shall be

    taken into account.

    A= Pass

    B,C,D = Indeterminate

    (Agilent treats D as Fail)

    E= Fail

    International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) G8 : Guidelines on the Reporting of Compliance with Specification