Diego González-Díaz (GSI-Darmstadt) GSI, 12-04-2010 now R3B!
Calculations of Beam Intensities Kick-off meeting, GSI, 17. 3. 2005 Task 11 : Calculations of Beam...
-
Upload
leon-hampton -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Calculations of Beam Intensities Kick-off meeting, GSI, 17. 3. 2005 Task 11 : Calculations of Beam...
Task 11: Calculations of Beam IntensitiesCalculations of Beam IntensitiesKick-off meeting, GSI, 17. 3. 2005Kick-off meeting, GSI, 17. 3. 2005
Motivation for Task 11• The scope of the science addressed by EURISOL is
strongly dependent on the beam intensities delivered. • The major goal is establishing standard calculation
procedures and codes, which are currently lacking, to facilitate comparison of various technical solutions for the facility. These codes will be based on existing experimental data, and, in a few specific cases, on new data acquired in the framework of the DS. In particular assessing the importance of having a driver with heavy-ion capability will be explored.
• The second important goal regards the investigation of novel ideas for secondary fragmentation and the assessment of the role of secondary reactions in single and two-stage targets, respectively.
Critical points for task 11
Heavy-ion capability
Reaction cross sectionsMultiple reactions Intensities
Nuclides
Efficiencies
Two-step reactionsIn-flight separation?
Connections to other tasks Connections to other tasks
Input Output
Task 11
Task 2Multi MW targets
Task 9Beam preparation
Task 4Fission target
Task 3Direct targets
Task 7Proton accelerator
Task 12Beta beams
Task 10Physics & Instrument.
Task 6HI accelerator
Management Structure of EURISOL_DS
Task descriptionTask description Objectives: Estimation of the available secondary-beam intensities, limitations in N-to-Z ratio, choice of the best adapted technical solutions.
7 participants: ISOLDE-CERN (P4), CEA/Saclay (P6), University of Jyväskylä (P8), University of Warsaw (P12), IoP Bratislava (P13), GSI (P15), University Santiago de Compostella (P16)
2 contributors: Khlopin Radium Institute (C4), VINČA-INS Belgrade (C16)
Task leader: Karl-Heinz Schmidt (GSI)
8 subtasks
Task break-downTask break-down ST1 Benefit of heavy-ion capabilities of the driver accelerator (IoP)
ST2 Fragmentation of post-accelerated ISOL beams (USC)
ST3 Fission models (GSI)
ST4 Spallation and fragmentation reactions (USC)
ST5 Neutron- and proton-induced reactions up to Fermi energy (JYU)
ST6 Heavy-ion reactions in the Fermi-energy domain (IoP)
ST7 Secondary reactions in single- and double-stage targets (CEA)
ST8 Predictions of secondary-beam intensities (GSI)
Pert diagram task 11
Working plan Feb. 05 - Jan. 06Working plan Feb. 05 - Jan. 06Subtask Work Participants Respons.
ST1ST1 Report on HI capabilities of driver accelerator
CEA, IoP, USC, GSI,
IoP
ST2ST2 Experiment 132Sn+Be USC, GSI, IoP, VINČA, UW
USC
ST3 ST3 Fission models validation JYU, GSI, USC GSIST4ST4 Data compilation, models benchmarking GSI, USC, VINČA USCST5ST5 Data on p-induced fission, code on p-
induced reactions, PEE modelJYU, KhRI, USC JYU
ST6ST6 Data compilation, model calculations, experiment preparations
IoP IoP
ST7ST7 Code validation, beam and target optimisation, single-stage target calculations
CEA, WU CEA
ST8ST8 ISOLDE-yield data base, thick-target model, EURISOL ND demand list
CERN, JYU, GSI, USC
GSI
EURISOL_DS / Task 11 – Kick-off meeting / AGENDA• 10:00 – 10:30 Introduction (K.-H. Schmidt)• 10:30 – 11:00 Subtask 1 "Benefit of heavy-ion capabilities of the driver
accelerator" (M. Veselsky)• 11:00 – 11:30 Coffee break• 11:30 – 12:00 Subtask 4: "Spallation and fragmentation reactions" (M.
V. Ricciardi)• 12:00 – 12:30 Subtask 3: "Fission model" (A.Kelić, V. Rubchenya)• 12:30 – 14:00 Lunch• 14:00 – 14:30 Subtask 2: "Fragmentation of post-accelerated ISOL
beams" (K.-H. Schmidt)• 14:30 – 15:00 Subtask 5: "Neutron- and proton-induced reactions up to
Fermi energy" (V. Rubchenya)• 15:00 – 15:30 Subtask 6: "Heavy-ion reactions in the Fermi-energy
domain" (M. Veselsky)• 15:30 – 16:00 Coffee break• 16:00 – 16:30 Subtask 7: "Aspects of secondary reactions in single-
and double-stage targets" (J.-C. David)• 16:30 – 17:00 Subtask 8: "Predictions of beam intensities" (S. Lukić)• 17:00 – 17:30 Conclusions
Milestone Month due
ST1 Heavy-ion requirement for driver acceleratorM1.1 Preliminary investigation 12ST2 Fragmentation of post accelerated ISOL beamsM2.1 Preparation of experiment 12ST3 Fission modelsM3.1 JYFL fission model results 5M3.2 GSI fission model results 12ST4 Spallation and fragmentation reactionsM4.1 Data and benchmarking of model for 238U 12ST5 n- and p-induced reactions up to Fermi energyST6 HI reactions at Fermi energyM6.1 Calculations of n-rich nuclei production 12ST7 Aspects of secondary reactionsM7.1 Code validation 5M7.2 Beam and target optimisation 12ST8 Predictions of secondary beam intensitiesM8.1 Completion of the ISOLDE yield data base 12
Expected results, Feb. 05 - Jan. 06Expected results, Feb. 05 - Jan. 06
Participant Position (MM) Money (K€) Starting dateCERNCERN 6 27 Aug. 05CEACEA - - -JYU JYU 12 54 Feb. 05UWUW 1.5 7 Aug. 05IoPIoP - - -GSIGSI 12 54 Feb. 05USCUSC 3 13.5 Aug. 05
Human resources, Feb. 05 - Jan. 06, demandHuman resources, Feb. 05 - Jan. 06, demandTotal: ~ 34.5 man-months
MM = Mann-Months
Financial resources, Feb. 05 - Jan. 06, Financial resources, Feb. 05 - Jan. 06, demanddemand
Total: 225.5 K€Participant Personnel Travel Consumable Total/Part CERNCERN 27 - - 27CEACEA - 4 - 4
JYU + KhRIJYU + KhRI 54 6 - 60UWUW 7 9.5 - 16.5IoPIoP - 7 20 27GSIGSI 54 1.5 - 55.5
VINVINČA-INSČA-INS - 16 - 16USCUSC 13.5 6 - 19.5Total 155.5 50 20 225.5
All numbers are given in K€
Meetings, Feb. 05 - Jan. 06Meetings, Feb. 05 - Jan. 06
• It is planned to have a general meeting of all participants and contributors of Task 11 in February 2005 (the date is still not fixed).
• During this meeting, different working groups will be formed.
• Two other meetings of all participants and contributors are planned (after 6 months and after 12 months) where the results of the different working groups as well as deliverables and reports will be presented.
• Moreover, if necessary, the members of different working groups can meet more frequently.