by Sovereignty International C/O 6340 Lake Worth Blvd ... · ZIP CODE EXEMPT [email protected]...

Jurisdiction –

Challenge it!!!

©Common Law Copyright 2019

by Sovereignty International (a trust)

C/O 6340 Lake Worth Blvd., #437

Fort Worth, Texas

ZIP CODE EXEMPT

[email protected] [email protected]

[email protected]

www.sovereigntyinternational.fyi

Disclaimers

I am NOT a liar (lawyer)

You should NEVER take my word for anything

You should always do your own research

I have provided references to aid you in your research

I don’t know everything and am open to any ideas

©Common Law Copyright 2019 2

CSPOA.ORG

Jurisdiction

"Where a court failed to observe

safeguards, it amounts to denial

of due process of law, court is

deprived of juris." Merritt v. Hunter,

C.A. Kansas 170 F2d 739


Jurisdiction "Not every action by any judge is in

exercise of his judicial function. It is not a

judicial function for a Judge to commit an

intentional tort even though the tort occurs

in the Courthouse, when a judge acts as a

Trespasser of the Law, when a judge does

not follow the law, the judge loses subject

matter jurisdiction and The Judge's orders

are void, of no legal force or effect"! Yates

Vs. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209

F.Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) ©Common Law Copyright 2019

Jurisdiction

When they deny due process they

lose subject matter jurisdiction

Subject matter jurisdiction can be

challenged at any time, even on

appeal

Once jurisdiction is challenged

everything stops until jurisdiction is

proven


Jurisdiction

"Defense of lack of jurisdiction

over the subject matter may be

raised at any time, even on

appeal." Hill Top Developers v.

Holiday Pines Service Corp. 478 So.

2D, 368 Fla a DCA 1985)


Jurisdiction "Jurisdiction can be challenged at

any time," and "Jurisdiction, once

challenged, cannot be assumed

and must be decided." Basso v.

Utah Power & Light Co. 395 F 2d

906, 910”


Jurisdiction "Once challenged, jurisdiction

cannot be assumed, it must be

proved to exist." Stuck v.

Medical Examiners 94 Ca 2d 751.

211 P2d 289”


Jurisdiction


"...[H]owever late this objection [to

jurisdiction] has been made, or may be

made in any cause, in an inferior or

appellate court of the United States, it must

be considered and decided, BEFORE any

court can move ONE FURTHER STEP IN

THE CAUSE; as any movement is

necessarily the exercise of jurisdiction."

RHODE ISLAND MASSACHUSETTS, 37 U.S.

657, 718, 9 L.Ed. 1233 (1838).

Jurisdiction "Where jurisdiction is contested, the

burden of establishing it rests upon the

plaintiff." Loos v American Energy Savers,

Inc., 168 I11.App.3d 558, 522 N.E.2d

841(1988)

"the burden of proving jurisdiction rests

upon the party asserting it." Binde11 v City

0f Harvey, 212 I11.App.3d 1042, 571 N.E.2d

1017(1st Dist. 1991)


Jurisdiction The Judge cannot decide jurisdiction

The burden is on the prosecutor to

prove jurisdiction

The Court cannot give itself

jurisdiction

Proceeding without jurisdiction is

NOT something that is considered

discretionary ©Common Law Copyright 2019

Jurisdiction "a universal principle as old as

the law is that a proceedings of

a court without jurisdiction are

a nullity and its judgment

therein without effect either on

person or property,” Norwood v.

Renfield, 34 C 329; Ex parte

Giambonini, 49 P. 732


Jurisdiction • "A departure by a court from those

recognized and established

requirements of law however close

apparent adherence to mere form in

methods of procedure which has the

effect of depriving one of a

constitutional right, is an excess of

jurisdiction.” Wuest v. Wuest, 127 P2d

934, 937.


Jurisdiction

"The burden shifts to the

court to prove

jurisdiction." Rosemond v.

Lambert, 469 F 2d 416


Jurisdiction "A court has no jurisdiction to

determine its own jurisdiction, for a

basic issue in any case before a

tribunal is its power to act, and a court

must have the authority to decide that

question the first instance.“ Rescue

Army v. Municipal Court of Los Angeles,

171 P2d 8: 331 US 549, 91 K, ed, 1666m

67 S, Ct, 1409


Jurisdiction "A court cannot confer jurisdiction

where none existed and cannot

make a void proceeding valid. It is

clear and well established law that

a void order can be challenged in

any court", OLD WAYNE MUT. L.

ASSOC. v. McDONOUGH, 204 U. S.

8, 27 S. Ct. 236 (1907)


Jurisdiction "Thus, where a judicial tribunal has no

jurisdiction of the subject matter on which

it assumes to act, its proceedings are

absolutely void in the fullest sense of the

term." Dillon v. Dillon, 187 P 27

“Judge loses his absolute immunity from

damage actions only when he acts in clear

absence of all jurisdiction or performance

of an act which is not judicial in nature.”

Schucker v. Rockwood, 846 F.2d 1202


Jurisdiction "There is no discretion to

ignore that lack of

jurisdiction." Joyce v. US,

474 F2d 215


Jurisdiction "The law requires proof of jurisdiction to

appear on the record of the administrative

agency and all administrative

proceedings." Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U. S.

538 (1974)

"Where there is no jurisdiction there is no

judge; the proceeding is as nothing. Such

has been the law from the days of the

Marshalsea, 10 Coke 68; also Bradley v.

Fisher, 13 Wall 335,351." Manning v.

Ketcham, 58 F.2d 948.


Jurisdiction “In arriving at our decision in this matter we

do not depart in any way from our holding in

Huendling v. Jensen [*300] that the doctrine

of judicial immunity extends to courts of

limited jurisdiction. But, when a minor

magistrate acts wholly without jurisdiction,

civil liability attaches for his malicious and

corrupt abuse of process and his willful and

malicious oppression of any person under

the pretense of acting in his official capacity.

See Huendling v. Jensen, 168 N.W.2d, at 749

and authorities cited.”188 N.W.2d 294; 1971

Iowa Sup. LEXIS 863; 64 A.L.R.3d 1242 ©Common Law Copyright 2019

Jurisdiction

Lack of Jurisdiction = Void Judgment

Proceeding without jurisdiction is a malicious prosecution

See the Void Judgments video


Jurisdiction

If they tell you they have jurisdiction without proving jurisdiction, it is a War Crime

“So we are doing War Crimes here today, are we?”


Lieber Code Article 1

“A place, district, or country occupied by an enemy stands, in consequence of the occupation, under the Martial Law of the invading or occupying army, whether any proclamation declaring Martial Law, or any public warning to the inhabitants, has been issued or not. Martial Law is the immediate and direct effect and consequence of occupation or conquest. The presence of a hostile army proclaims its Martial Law.” Article 1, Lieber Code [emphasis added]



“Martial Law does not cease during the hostile occupation, except by special proclamation, ordered by the commander in chief; or by special mention in the treaty of peace concluding the war, when the occupation of a place or territory continues beyond the conclusion of peace as one of the conditions of the same.” Article 2, Lieber Code [emphasis added] ©Common Law Copyright 2019

Martial Law All civil war states are under a military

occupation – Virginia, North Carolina, South

Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama,

Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, Texas,

Missouri, Tennessee, Kentucky

All of the states in the territory conquered in

the War with Mexico are under a military

occupation, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah,

Nevada

Dictation = Dictatorship – Military Dictatorship

Law Enforcement = Enforcing the Martial Law ©Common Law Copyright 2019

Martial Law

When the southern states walked out of Congress in 1861 they ceased to have a quorum

Under executive authority (Martial Law) Lincoln ordered Congress to re-convene

When The Supreme Court ruled against something Lincoln did, he ordered troops to the Supreme court

“All process of this Court issues in the name of the President of the United States.” Rule 45. Process; Mandates


Martial Law All Statutes (state or federal) passed prior to 1861 are

lawful de jure statutes

All statutes (state or federal) passed after 1861 are Martial Law Statutes

“Two national governments exist, one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions, the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument” Dissenting opinion of Justice Marshall Harlan. Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 1901.

In 1871 Congress set up a corporation to operate as the government of the District of Columbia


Excited Domestic Insurrections


Bankruptcy = Martial Law "It is an established fact that the United States

Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent, H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress in session June 5, 1933 - Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only.” United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33


Bankruptcy = Martial Law "Since March 9, 1933; the United States has been in a state of

declared National Emergency . . . Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens. . . . A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have in varying degrees been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency . . .“ In Reg: U.S. Senate Report No. 93-549 dated 11/19/73 (73 CIS Serial Set S963-2 - [607 Pages])


Military Dictatorship • “Martial Law in a hostile country consists in the

suspension, by the occupying military authority,

of the criminal and civil law, and of the domestic

administration and government in the occupied

place or territory, and in the substitution of

military rule and force for the same, as well as in

the dictation of general laws, as far as military

necessity requires this suspension, substitution,

or dictation.

• The commander of the forces may proclaim that

the administration of all civil and penal law shall

continue either wholly or in part, as in times of

peace, unless otherwise ordered by the military authority.” Article 3, Lieber Code


Military Dictatorship • “Military necessity, as understood by modern

civilized nations, consists in the necessity of those

measures which are indispensable for securing the

ends of the war, and which are lawful according to the

modern law and usages of war.” Article 14, Lieber Code

• “Military necessity does not admit of cruelty - that is,

the infliction of suffering for the sake of suffering or

for revenge, nor of maiming or wounding except in

fight, nor of torture to extort confessions. It does not

admit of the use of poison in any way, nor of the

wanton devastation of a district. It admits of

deception, but disclaims acts of perfidy; and, in

general, military necessity does not include any act of

hostility which makes the return to peace

unnecessarily difficult.” Article 16, Lieber Code ©Common Law Copyright 2019

Lieber Code Article 7 “Martial Law extends to property, and to

persons, whether they are subjects of the enemy or aliens to that government.” Article 7 Lieber code

Subjects or Aliens – nobody else

Does NOT affect sovereignty

Why would anyone want to be a lowlife scumbag US citizen

If a military police officer is talking to you, then you are a subject and you are the enemy



“All subjects over which the sovereign power

of the state extends are objects of taxation,

but those over which it does not extend are

exempt from taxation. This proposition may

also be pronounced as self-evident. The

sovereignty of the state extends to everything

which exists by its authority or its

permission.” McCullough v Maryland, 17 U.S. [4

Wheat] 316 (1819). [emphasis added]


Subject = Slave = Enemy “The Congress shall have power to dispose of

and make all needful rules and regulations

respecting the…. other property belonging to

the United States…...” Article 4, Section 3,

Clause 2, Constitution for the United States of

America

“Section 2 Definitions (1) In this Act,

owned means, subject to the regulations,…..;”

Canadian Ownership and Control Determination

Act


Subject = Slave = Enemy "The term resident and citizen of the United States is

distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states,

in that the former is a special class of citizen created by

Congress." U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)

“[T]he term "citizen," in the United States, is analogous

to the term "subject" in the common law.” State vs

Manual 20 NC 122, 14 C.J.S. 4, p 430

"Civil rights under the 14th amendment are for Federal

citizens and not State Citizens; Federal citizens, as

parents, have no right to the custody of their infant

children except subject to the paramount right of the

State." Wadleigh v. Newhall, Circuit Court N. Dist. Cal., Mar

13, 1905 ©Common Law Copyright 2019

Subject = Slave = Enemy “...it is evident that they [U.S. citizens] have not the

political rights which are vested in citizens of the

States. They are not constituents of any community

in which is vested any sovereign power of

government. Their position partakes more of the

character of subjects than of citizens. They are

subject to the laws of the United States, but have no

voice in its management. If they are allowed to make

laws, the validity of these laws is derived from the

sanction of a Government in which they are not

represented. Mere citizenship they may have, but the

political rights of citizens they cannot enjoy…”

People v. De La Guerra,40 Cal. 311, 342 (A.D. 1870) ©Common Law Copyright 2019

Article 10 Lieber Code

“Martial Law affects chiefly the police and collection of public revenue and taxes, whether imposed by the expelled government or by the invader, and refers mainly to the support and efficiency of the army, its safety, and the safety of its operations.” Article 10, Lieber Code



All police are military police

FBI military police

City military police

State military police

Homeland Security military police

County military police



All police are military

police and if they are

talking to you, then you

are a subject and you are

the enemy!!!


You are the Enemy

Lieber Code Article 13 “Military jurisdiction is of two kinds: First, that which

is conferred and defined by statute; second, that which is derived from the common law of war. Military offenses under the statute law must be tried in the manner therein directed; but military offenses which do not come within the statute must be tried and punished under the common law of war. The character of the courts which exercise these jurisdictions depends upon the local laws of each particular country. In the armies of the United States the first is exercised by courts-martial, while cases which do not come within the "Rules and Articles of War," or the jurisdiction conferred by statute on courts-martial, are tried by military commissions.” Article 13, Lieber Code



All statutes are in support of the Martial Law

All statutes apply to subjects ONLY

There are 2 kinds of court proceedings, Courts Martial and Military Commissions


References Copies of these documents can be found at My

private group at Yahoo called Administrating-

Your-Public-Servants

For a complete set of Youtube videos with Private

Information Shares, a DVD with over 50

searchable Law Dictionaries, and other books

and forms contact me privately at

[email protected]

Donations to support this work are appreciated. I

prefer gold or silver coin, but as an extremely less

desirable alternative I can accept IOUs (Federal

Reserve Notes, Paypal gifts, checks, money

orders, etc) send me an email for particulars ©Common Law Copyright 2019

CSPOA.ORG

Military Dictatorship Martial Law Supersedes and replaces Common

Law

“…statutes have been passed extending the courts of admiralty and vice-admiralty far beyond their ancient limits for depriving us the accustomed and inestimable privilege of trial by jury, in cases affecting both life and property…….to supersede the course of common law and instead thereof to publish and order the use and exercise of the law martial….….. and for altering fundamentally the form of government established by charter.

We saw the misery to which such despotism would reduce us.” Causes and Necessity of Taking Up Arms (1775)


Military Dictatorship

There are no common law offenses against the United States. Only those acts which Congress has forbidden, with penalties for disobedience of its command, are crimes. United States v. Hudson & Goodwin, 11 U.S. (7th Cr.) 32 (1812); United States v. Coolidge, 14 U.S. (1 Wheat.) 415 (1816); United States v. Britton, 108 U.S. 199, 206 (1883); United States v. Eaton, 144 U.S. 677, 687 (1892).



Under Texas law, no act or omission is a crime unless made so by statute. Dawson v. Vance, 329 F.Supp. 1320, (D.C.Tex. 1971). The Legislature may create an offense and in same enactment, provide exceptions to its application. Williams v. State, 176 SW2d 177, Tex.Cr.App., 1943.



“A. All common law offenses and affirmative defenses are abolished. No conduct or omission constitutes an offense or an affirmative defense unless it is an offense or an affirmative defense under this title or under another statute or ordinance.” Arizona Revised Statutes 13-103. Abolition of common law offenses and affirmative defenses; definition



“The common law only so far as it is consistent with and adapted to the natural and physical conditions of this state and the necessities of the people thereof, and not repugnant to or inconsistent with the Constitution of the United States or the constitution or laws of this state, or established customs of the people of this state, is adopted and shall be the rule of decision in all courts of this state.” Arizona Revised Statutes 1-201. Adoption of common law; exceptions


Two National Governments Government officials wear 2 hats

They can represent the unconstitutional corporation, or they can represent the lawful de jure government

Because of our own ignorance (ignore – ance) we have given them evidence of their slave

They presume we are their slave until we defeat their presumption


You are the Enemy!

“Under International Law of Warfare, all parties to a cause must appear by nom de guerre, because an "alien enemy cannot maintain an action during the war in his own name". Merriam-Webster Dictionary, pg. 1534

"A mixed war is one which is made on one side by public authority, and the other by mere private persons." Black's Law Dictionary 5th Ed., page 1420


You are the Enemy! “The United States acknowledge and protect, in

hostile countries occupied by them, religion and morality; strictly private property; the persons of the inhabitants, especially those of women: and the sacredness of domestic relations. Offenses to the contrary shall be rigorously punished.

This rule does not interfere with the right of the victorious invader to tax the people or their property, to levy forced loans, to billet soldiers, or to appropriate property, especially houses, lands, boats or ships, and churches, for temporary and military uses” Article 37, Lieber Code


You are the Enemy

"The forced loans of 1862 and 1863, in the form of legal tender notes, were vital forces in the struggle for national supremacy. They formed a part of the public debt of the United States, ..." Julliard v. Greenman, 110 US 432.

Federal Reserve Notes = Military Script

Federal Reserve Notes = Forced Loans – they are forcing the enemy (you) to loan the government money


Martial Law Statutes

"Governments [ any sovereign] descend to the level of a mere private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen...where private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and securities [checks] is concerned . ... For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government.” Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363 (1943)

Federal Reserve Notes = Military Script


Martial Law Statutes All statutes are Martial Law Statutes

All statutes apply to subjects ONLY

The military police often say “you think our laws don’t apply to you”

The Lieber Code says it all

“Do they even teach you to read???”

The last thing they want to talk about is War Crimes

War Crimes precipitate revolutions


War Crimes “No contract, agreement or regulation shall impair

the right of any worker, whether voluntary or not and wherever he may be, to apply to the representatives of the Protecting Power in order to request the said Power’s intervention.

All measures aiming at creating unemployment or at restricting the opportunities offered to workers in an occupied territory, in order to induce them to work for the Occupying Power, are prohibited.” Article 52, Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in Time of War of 1949 [emphasis added]


War Crimes “(13) the term “Federal personnel” means officers

and employees of the Government of the United States, members of the uniformed services (including members of the Reserve Components), individuals entitled to receive immediate or deferred retirement benefits under any retirement program of the Government of the United States (including survivor benefits).” 5 USC § 552a. (a)(13) [emphasis added]

Anybody with a Social Security Number is “federal personnel”

If they compel the disclosure of a SSN, they are compelling you to work for the occupying power


War Crimes Filing fees are a regulation

Court rules are a regulation

By turning on their emergency lights they are terrorizing you

Coercing information from you or a third party is a war crime

When they coerce a date of birth from you they are compelling you to work for the occupying power – a war crime

When they use their regulations to deny you justice – it is a war crime


Military Occupation “Protected persons are entitled, in all circumstances, to respect

for their persons, their honour, their family rights, their religious convictions and practices, and their manners and customs.

They shall at all times be humanely treated, and shall be protected especially against all acts of violence or threats thereof and against insults and public curiosity.

Women shall be especially protected against any attack on their honour, in particular against rape, enforced prostitution, or any form of indecent assault.

Without prejudice to the provisions relating to their state of health, age and sex, all protected persons shall be treated with the same consideration by the Party to the conflict in whose power they are, without any adverse distinction based, in particular, on race, religion or political opinion….” Article 27, Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in Time of War of 1949 [emphasis added]


War Crimes

When they stop you, because you have plates on your vehicle that are NOT state plates, they are persecuting you for your political opinion

When they drag you into their kangaroo court they are subjecting you to their satanic religious ceremony


Advertisement Don’t forget to subscribe to this Youtube

channel

Don’t forget to follow me on Steemit @sovereigntyintl

Don’t forget to Like this video

On Youtube don’t forget to click the bell next to the subscribe button so that you are notified when there is a new upload

On steemit don’t forget to vote and make your comments


Warfare = Military Occupation

“…..the present Convention shall apply to all cases of declared war or of any other armed conflict which may arise …, even if the state of war is not recognized by one of them.

The Convention shall also apply to all cases of partial or total occupation of the territory …., even if the said occupation meets with no armed resistance…..” Article 2, Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in Time of War of 1949 [emphasis added]


Warfare = Commerce When that LEO (PIG) stops you with his emergency

lights

He is armed

He is wearing a military uniform with military rank insignia

It is an armed conflict whether you recognize it or not!

The fact that he stopped you is proof that he is accusing you of being a subject

"A mixed war is one which is made on one side by public authority, and the other by mere private persons." Black's Law Dictionary 5th Ed., page 1420


Military Occupation “…., the Occupying Power shall be

bound, for the duration of the occupation, to the extent that such Power exercises the functions of government in such territory, by the provisions of the following Articles of the present Convention: 1 to 12, 27, 29 to 34, 47, 49, 51, 52, 53, 59, 61 to 77, 143.” Article 6, Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians in Time of War of 1949 [emphasis added]


Lieber Code Article 44 “All wanton violence committed against persons in the

invaded country, all destruction of property not commanded by the authorized officer, all robbery, all pillage or sacking, even after taking a place by main force, all rape, wounding, maiming, or killing of such inhabitants, are prohibited under the penalty of death, or such other severe punishment as may seem adequate for the gravity of the offense.

A soldier, officer or private, in the act of committing such violence, and disobeying a superior ordering him to abstain from it, may be lawfully killed on the spot by such superior.” Article 44, Lieber Code


War Crimes “Collective penalties and likewise all measures of

intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited.” Article 33, Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 1949

Military Uniforms are designed to be intimidating

The carrying of guns, by their code enforcers, (PIGs) is intimidating, especially if they have laws preventing you from owning guns

If the PIG yells at you because you are NOT cooperating, it is threatening and intimidating

Their uniforms and vehicle colors and paint scheme are designed to be threatening and intimidating


War Crimes “No protected person may be punished for an

offence he or she has not personally committed. Collective penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited.

Pillage is prohibited.

Reprisals against protected persons and their property are prohibited.” Article 33, Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 1949

If they seize your property, it is pillaging and reprisals

They are taking reprisals against you because you don’t want to be their slave


Subscription Channels I have exclusive videos available on my website

www.sovereigntyinternational.fyi

2 subscription levels, and I accept crypto currencies

$29.99/year for the videos only

$49.99/year for videos plus unlimited consultations – I am NOT a liar (Attorney) but I can tell you what I would do and where to find forms

The ONLY power that the N.W.O. satanists have over us is through fraud and deception, and my agenda is to expose it for all our benefit – I cannot fight all of the battles

Currently publishing 1 video a week


Exclusive Content Arlington Private Information Share

Land Deed Training

Estoppel Certificates Training

Foreclosure Estoppel Certificates Training

Corporate Denial Training

Toll Roads Notice and Demand Training

Invoice Training

Notice of Void Judgment training

Revocation of Signature training

Third Party Witness Training

Federal Habeas Corpus Training


Exclusive Content Revocation of Voter Registration

Criminal Complaint Training

Lawsuit Training

Other Training (requests?)

Northeast Private Information Share videos

All forms, files and other instructions are available for free on my 2 private groups at YahooGroups and GoogleGroups

All exclusive content will be on my website and you can buy a subscription there


Cestui que trust

"But individuals, when acting as representatives of a collective group, cannot be said to be exercising their personal rights and duties, nor be entitled to their purely personal privileges. Rather they assume the rights, duties and privileges of the artificial entity or association of which they are agents or officers and they are bound by its obligations." Brasswell v. United States 487 U.S. 99 (1988) quoting, United States v. White 322 U.S. 694 (1944)


US Citizen = Roman Law = Roman Cult

“Yet still it was found difficult to set bounds to ecclesiastical ingenuity; for when they were driven out of all their former holds, they devised a new method of conveyance, by which the lands were granted, not to themselves directly, but to nominal feoffees to the use of the religious houses; thus distinguishing between the possession and the use, and receiving the actual profits, while the seisin of the lands remained in the nominal feoffee, who was held by the courts of equity (then under the direction of the clergy) to be bound in conscience to account to his cestui que use for the rents and emoluments [taxes] of the estate: and it is to these inventions that our practitioners are indebted for the introduction of uses and trusts, the foundation of modern conveyancing.” Tomlins Law Dictionary 1835 edition, Volume 2 under the definition of Mortmain [emphasis added]


Quasi-Contracts = Commerce “Assumpsit - ….In its origin an action of tort, [assumpsit] was soon transformed into an action of contract, becoming afterwards a remedy where there was neither tort nor contract. Based at first only upon an express promise, it was afterwards supported upon an implied promise, and even upon a fictitious promise. Introduced as a special manifestation of the action on the case, it soon acquired the dignity of a distinct form of action, which superseded Debt, became concurrent with Account, with Case upon a bailment, a warranty, and bills of exchange, and competed with Equity in the case of the essentially equitable quasi-contracts growing out of the principle of unjust enrichment. ….” James Barr Ames, “The History of Assumpsit,” in 3 Select Essays in Anglo-American Legal History 298 (1909).” Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th Edition, page 379 [emphasis added]


Quasi Contracts

"Both in Roman and English law there are certain obligations which were not in truth contractual, but which the law treats as IF they were. They are contractual in law, but not in fact, being the subject-matter of a fictitious extension of the sphere of contract to cover obligations which do not in reality fall within it." Salmond, Salmond on Jurisprudence, p. 642 (9th Edition, 1937, Sweet & Maxwell, Ltd. England). [emphasis added]


Quasi Contracts "Constructive/quasi contracts are based solely upon

a legal fiction or fiction of law." Hill v. Waxberg, 237 F.2d 936.

"It is a well settled rule of law that he who seeks benefits of contract must also assume burdens." Higgins v. Monckton (1938), 28 C.A.2d 723, 83 P.2d 516.

"Voluntary acceptance of benefit of transaction is equivalent to consent to all obligations arising from it, so far as facts are known, or ought to be known, to person accepting." Northern Assurance Co. v. Stout (1911), 16 C.A. 548, 117 P. 617.


Quasi Contracts = Benefits

Why do you think they want a Social Security Number when you apply for a Drivers License?

Or Unemployment Insurance?

Or a Passport?

Or any other “benefit”

All they need is a date of birth to pull up their cestui que trust in their hearsay database


Kangaroo Courts are Everywhere!

“Kangaroo court. Term descriptive of a sham legal proceeding in which a person's rights are totally disregarded and in which the result is a foregone conclusion because of the bias of the court or other tribunal.” Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 868


Contact Information My Blog is; http://sovereigntyinternational.wordpress.com

Website - www.sovereigntyinternational.fyi

Email - [email protected]

Youtube profile – sovereignliving

Facebook - Community Page - Deleted

Private Group – Sovereignty International – Being deleted

Yahoo Private Group – Administrating-Your-Public-Servants

Google Private Group – Administrating-Your-Public-Servants

Follow me on twitter @engineerwin

Follow me on Steemit https://steemit.com/@sovereigntyintl

https://www.bitchute.com/channel/sovereigntyinternational/


War Crimes

“No physical or moral coercion shall be exercised against protected persons, in particular to obtain information from them or from third parties.” Article 31, Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Civilians in a Time of War of 1949

This could be used against the NSA and the CIA, or Facebook, or the banksters compelling the disclosure of a SSN

It can also be used against the PIGs when they coerce information from you on the side of the road

They are coercing information about you from the DMV database


War Crimes “The High Contracting Parties specifically agree that

each of them is prohibited from taking any measure of such a character as to cause the physical suffering or extermination of protected persons in their hands. This prohibition applies not only to murder, torture, corporal punishment, mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not necessitated by the medical treatment of a protected person, but also to any other measures of brutality whether applied by civilian or military agents.” Article 32, Geneva Convention to the Relative to the Treatment of Civilians in a Time of War of 1949


Military Occupation

“Terrorism - noun – 2 A system of government that seeks to rule by intimidation.” Funk and Wagnal’s New Practical Standard Dictionary (1946)


United Nations = Roman Law =

Roman Cult

“The States Parties to the present Covenant, including those having responsibility for the administration of Non-Self-Governing and Trust Territories, shall promote the realization of the right of self-determination, and shall respect that right, in conformity with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations.” International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 1, Clause 3 [emphasis added]


(bought and paid for) Clerk

masquerading as a Judge = War Crime

“All persons shall be equal before the

courts and tribunals. In the determination

of any criminal charge against him, or of

his rights and obligations in a suit at law,

everyone shall be entitled to a fair and

public hearing by a competent,

independent and impartial tribunal

established by law.” International Covenant

on Civil and Political Rights, Article 14, Clause

1


(bought and paid for) Clerk masquerading

as a Judge = War Crimes

“No sentence shall be pronounced by the competent courts of the Occupying Power except after a regular trial….” Article 71 Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Civilians in a Time of War of 1949

“It is a fundamental right of a party to have a

neutral and detached judge preside over the

judicial proceedings.” Ward v Village of

Monroeville, 409 U.S. 57, 61-62, 93 S.Ct 80, 83, 34

L.Ed. 2d 267 (1972); Tumey v Ohio, 273 U.S. 510,

5209, 47 S. Ct. 437, 440, 71 L.Ed. 749 (1927)


Other Videos Bankster Thieves playlist

Roman Cult playlist

Bankrupt Corporate (so-called) Governments

BAR Members 1 - 4

D.I.Y. How NOT to Volunteer for the Selective Service and the Draft

Martial Law is here!

D.I.Y. No Income Tax

D.I.Y. Free Mail

D.I.Y. Kangaroo Courts 1 – 15

Canada Border PIGs playlist

BAR Members and their Satanic Connections playlist ©Common Law Copyright 2019

(bought and paid for) Clerk masquerading

as a Judge = War Crimes

If the “Judge” denies your challenge to jurisdiction

without making the prosecutor prove jurisdiction,

then it is a war crime in violation of Article 71 of

the Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection

of Civilians in a Time of War of 1949

He is NOT neutral or unbiased – I would say “so

we are doing war crimes here are we?”

Either they have jurisdiction and can prove it, or

the Judge MUST dismiss the case


(bought and paid for) Clerk

masquerading as a Judge = War

Crimes

"if the record does not show

upon its face the facts necessary

to give jurisdiction, they will be

presumed not to have existed.“

Norman v. Zieber, 3 Or at 202-03


Military Occupation

“Protected persons may in no circumstances renounce in part or in entirety the rights secured to them by the present Convention, …...” Article 8, Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Civilians in a Time of War of 1949


War Crimes

“The Party to the conflict in whose hands protected persons may be, is responsible for the treatment accorded to them by its agents, irrespective of any individual responsibility which may be incurred.” Article 29, Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Civilians in a Time of War of 1949


War Crimes These Roman Cult satanists are bending over

backwards to make you think you have constitutional rights

It is extremely important to them that people do not figure this out because the last time they were doing War crimes, it precipitated a revolution

If you challenge jurisdiction, the (so-called) judge is required to compel the prosecutor to prove jurisdiction, or dismiss the case. If they do anything else it is a denial of due process – a war crime


War Crimes They are cowards

They are real brave when there are 20 or 30 of them but when it is just you and them they are cowards!

They sneak around and fabricate evidence that you are the enemy and a subject (their slave) but they will never confront you without lots of their buddies to back them up

You are the enemy and the sooner you figure that out the better

You are a subject and their slave and the sooner you figure that out the better


War Crimes “Give me liberty or give me death” Patrick Henry after

witnessing a man flogged to death for refusing to take a license

They were assaulting people with their Roman Cult cestui que trust

"In doing this, I shall have occasion incidentally to evince, how true it is that States and Governments were made for man, and, at the same time, how true it is that his creatures and servants have first deceived, next vilified, and, at last oppressed their master and maker." Chisholm v Georgia, 2 Dal. 419 at p 455

"A state like a merchant makes a contract. A dishonest state, like a dishonest merchant willfully refuses to discharge it." Chisholm v Georgia, 2 Dal. 419 at p 456, and further,


War Crimes The communists in the Southern Poverty Law Center

are responsible

They are persecuting you for your political beliefs

They are taking reprisals against you because you don’t want to be their slave

They are pillaging your property

They are NOT respecting your religious beliefs

They are terrorizing you

They are threatening you

They are coercing information from you and from third parties

They are engaging in Genocide against State Citizens ©Common Law Copyright 2019

Sovereign Citizen = Reprisals

War Crimes Remember – It is Warfare – You have to treat it like it

is warfare because that is EXACTLY what it is

Don’t wait for them to attack you, attack them first

Make an Affidavit of Corporate Denial

Serve them with a Notice and Demand that is designed to take away their presumptions – if you do this effectively it will put them in a very difficult position

If the PIGs stop you – it is warfare – “So we are doing war crimes today?” “Are you coercing information from me?” “Are you taking reprisals against me?”

Begin building a case against them from the beginning – it is warfare ©Common Law Copyright 2019

War Crimes “In arriving at our decision in this matter we do not

depart in any way from our holding in Huendling v.

Jensen [*300] that the doctrine of judicial immunity

extends to courts of limited jurisdiction. But, when a

minor magistrate acts wholly without jurisdiction,

civil liability attaches for his malicious and corrupt

abuse of process and his willful and malicious

oppression of any person under the pretense of

acting in his official capacity. See Huendling v.

Jensen, 168 NW2d at 749 and authorities cited.”188

N.W.2d 294; 1971 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 863; 64 A.L.R.3d

1242


Malicious Prosecution

"Although probable cause may

not be inferred from malice,

malice may be inferred from lack

of probable cause." Pauley v. Hall,

335 N. W. 2d 197, 124 Mich App 255


War Crimes • “(3) Lack of Subject-Matter

Jurisdiction. If the court

determines at any time that it

lacks subject-matter jurisdiction,

the court must dismiss the

action.” Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure 12 (h) (3)


Official Oppression “(a) A public servant acting under color of his office

or employment commits an offense if he;

(1) intentionally subjects another to mistreatment or

arrest, detention, search, seizure, dispossession,

assessment, or lien that he knows is unlawful;

(2) intentionally denies or impedes another in the

exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power,

or immunity, knowing his conduct to be unlawful;

or….

(b) For purposes of this section, a public servant

acts under color of his office or employment if he

acts or purports to act in an official capacity or

takes advantage of such actual or purported

capacity.” Texas Penal Code § 39.03 Official

Oppression

Official Oppression “(a) A public servant….with intent to obtain a

benefit or….to harm or defraud another, he

intentionally or knowingly;

(1) violates a law relating to the public servant’s

office or employment; or

(2) misuses government property, services,

personnel or anything of value belonging to the

government that has come into the public

servant’s custody or possession by virtue of the

public servant’s office or employment.” Texas

Penal Code § 39.02 Abuse of Official Capacity

Simulating a Legal Process “(a) A person commits an offense if the person

recklessly causes to be delivered to another any

document that simulates a summons, complaint,

judgment, or other court process with the intent to:

(1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or

(2) cause another to:

(A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or

(B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in

response to the document, in compliance with the

document, or on the basis of the document.

(b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person

with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended

recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was

delivered…..” Texas Penal Code Sec. § 32.48. Simulating

Legal Process

Organized Crime “(a) Conspired to commit…engage in

conduct that would constitute the

offense…or…perform an overt act…”

(d) Criminal street gang…having a

common identifying sign or symbol or an

identifiable leadership who continuously

or regularly associate in the commission

of criminal activities.”

Texas Penal Code Title 11. Organized Crime,

Chapter 71. Organized Crime § 71.01

CSPOA.ORG

by Sovereignty International C/O 6340 Lake Worth Blvd ... · ZIP CODE EXEMPT [email protected]...

Documents

Transcript of by Sovereignty International C/O 6340 Lake Worth Blvd ... · ZIP CODE EXEMPT [email protected]...