By: Shikha Bisht

9
By: Shikha Bisht

Transcript of By: Shikha Bisht

By:

Shikha Bisht

The Baroque Style of Art

The term Baroque is applied to diverse styles, a fact that highlights the approximate character of art-

historical categories. Like Gothic, Baroque was originally a pejorative term. It is a French variant of

the Portuguese barroco, meaning an irregular, and therefore imperfect, pearl. The Italians used the

word barocco to describe a convoluted medieval style of academic logic. Although Classical themes

and subject matter continued to appeal to artists and their patrons, Baroque tended to be relatively

unrestrained, overtly emotional, and more energetic than earlier styles. Baroque artists rejected

aspects of Mannerist virtuosity and stylization, while absorbing the Mannerists’ taste for chiaroscuro

and theatrical effects. They were more likely than Mannerist artists to pursue the study of nature

directly. As a result, Baroque art achieves a new kind of naturalism that reflects some of the

scientific advances of the period. There is also a new taste for dramatic action and violent narrative

scenes, and emotion is given a wide range of expression—a departure from the Renaissance

adherence to Classical restraint. Baroque color and light are dramatically contrasted, and surfaces

are richly textured. Baroque space is usually asymmetrical and lacks the appearance of controlled

linear perspective; sharply diagonal planes generally replace the predominant verticals and

horizontals of Renaissance compositions. Landscape, genre, and still life, which had originated as

separate but minor categories of painting in the sixteenth century, gained new status in the

seventeenth. Allegory also takes on a new significance in Baroque art and is no longer found

primarily in a biblical context. Portraiture, too, develops in new directions, as artists depict character

and mood along with the physical presence of their subjects.

Whereas Renaissance artists reveled in the precise, orderly rationality of classical models, Baroque

artists embraced dynamism, theatricality, and elaborate ornamentation, all used to spectacular

effect, often on a grandiose scale.

Gian Lorenzo Bernini, Italian artist who was perhaps the greatest sculptor of the 17th century and an

outstanding architect as well.He was born Dec. 7, 1598, Naples, Kingdom of Naples [Italy]—died

Nov. 28, 1680, Rome, Papal States . Bernini created the Baroque style of sculpture and developed it

to such an extent that other artists are of only minor importance in a discussion of that style.

Bernini’s career began under his father, Pietro Bernini, a Florentine sculptor of some talent who

ultimately moved to Rome. He was strongly influenced by his close study of the antique Greek and

Roman marbles in the Vatican, and he also had an intimate knowledge of High Renaissance painting

of the early 16th century. His study of Michelangelo is revealed in the St. Sebastian (c. 1617), carved

for Maffeo Cardinal Barberini, who was later Pope Urban VIII and Bernini’s greatest patron.

Bernini’s contribution in Baroque Art

Bernini’s early works attracted the attention of Scipione Cardinal Borghese, a member of the

reigning papal family. Under his patronage, Bernini carved his first important life-size sculptural

groups. The series shows Bernini’s progression from the almost haphazard single view of Aeneas,

Anchises, and Ascanius Fleeing Troy (1619) to strong frontality in Pluto and Proserpina (1621–22)

and then to the hallucinatory vision of Apollo and Daphne (1622–24), which was intended to be

viewed from one spot as if it were a relief. In his David (1623–24), Bernini depicts the figure casting a

stone at an unseen adversary. Several portrait busts that Bernini executed during this period,

including that of Robert Cardinal Bellarmine (1623–24), show a new awareness of the relationship

between head and body and display an ability to depict fleeting facial expressions with acute

realism. These marble works show an unparalleled virtuosity in carving that obdurate material to

achieve the delicate effects usually found only in bronze sculptures. Bernini’s sensual awareness of

the surface textures of skin and hair and his novel sense of shading broke with the tradition of

Michelangelo and marked the emergence of a new period in the history of Western sculpture.

BERNINI’S ART WORKS

1. DAVID

′ ″

Bernini’s David differs fundamentally In his life-size marble sculpture David of 1623, all trace of

Mannerism has disappeared. He represents a narrative moment requiring action. David leans to his

right and stretches the sling, while turning his head to look over his shoulder at Goliath. In contrast

to Donatello’s relaxed, self-satisfied bronze David, who has already killed Goliath, and

Michelangelo’s , who tensely sights his adversary, Bernini’s is in the midst of the action. Bernini’s

David, his muscular legs widely and firmly planted, begins the violent, pivoting motion that will

launch the stone from his sling. (A bag full of stones is at David’s left hip, suggesting he thought the

fight would be tough and long.) Unlike Myron, the fifth-century bc Greek sculptor who froze his

Discus Thrower at a fleeting moment of inaction, Bernini selected the most dramatic of an implied

sequence of poses, requiring the viewer to think simultaneously of the continuum and of this tiny

fraction of it.

Donatello, David, c. 1430–40 Michelangelo, David .c. 1501–4.

.

The suggested continuum imparts a dynamic quality to the statue. In Bernini’s David, the energy

confined in Michelangelo’s figures and bursts forth. The Baroque statue seems to be moving

through time and through space. This kind of sculpture cannot be inscribed in a cylinder or confined

in a niche. Its unrestrained action demands space around it. Nor is it self-sufficient in the

Renaissance sense, as its pose and attitude direct attention beyond it to the unseen Goliath.

Bernini’s David moves out into the space surrounding it, expression of intense concentration on

David’s face contrasts vividly with the classically placid visages of Donatello’s and Verrocchio’s

versions and is more emotionally charged even than Michelangelo’s. The tension in David’s face

augments the dramatic impact of Bernini’s sculpture.

Bernini’s David is a single figure, it assumes the presence of Goliath, thereby expanding the space—

psychologically as well as formally—beyond the sculpture. This is a characteristic, theatrical Baroque

technique for involving the spectator in the work.

2. Ecstasy of Saint Teresa

Gianlorenzo Bernini, Ecstasy of Saint Teresa, Cornaro chapel, Santa Maria della Vittoria, Rome, Italy, 1645–1652. Marble, height of group 11′ 6″

Another work displaying the motion and emotion that are hallmarks of Italian Baroque art is

Bernini’s Ecstasy of Saint Teresa in the Cornaro chapel of the Roman church of Santa Maria della

Vittoria. The work exemplifies the Baroque master’s refusal to limit his statues to firmly defined

spatial settings. For this commission, Bernini marshaled the full capabilities of architecture,

sculpture, and painting to charge the entire chapel with palpable tension. The marble sculpture that

serves as the chapel’s focus depicts Saint Teresa of Avila (1515–1582), a nun of the Carmelite order

and one of the great mystical saints of the Spanish Counter-Reformation. The conversion occurred

after the death of her father, when she fell into a series of trances, saw visions, and heard voices.

Feeling a persistent pain, she attributed it to the fire-tipped arrow of divine love an angel had thrust

repeatedly into her heart.

Architecture:

Gianlorenzo Bernini, baldachino, St. Peter’s, Rome, 1624–33. Gilded bronze, approx. 95 ft. (28.96 m) high.

Bernini had won the commission to erect a gigantic bronze baldacchino under Giacomo della

Porta’s dome. Completed between 1624 and 1633, the canopy like structure (baldacco is Italian for

“silk from Baghdad,” such as for a cloth canopy) stands almost 100 feet high (the height of an

average eight-story building) and serves both functional and symbolic purposes. It marks the high

altar and the tomb of Saint Peter, and it visually bridges human scale to the lofty vaults and dome

above. Bernini reduced the space at the crossing so that worshipers would be drawn to the altar. He

did so by erecting the bronze baldachino, or canopy, over the high altar above St. Peter’s tomb. Four

twisted columns, decorated with acanthus scrolls and surmounted by angels, support a bronze

valance resembling the tasseled cloth canopy used in religious processions. At the top, a gilded cross

stands on an orb. The twisted-column motif did not originate with Bernini. In the fourth century,

Constantine was thought to have taken spiral columns from Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem and

used them at Old St. Peter’s. Eight of these columns were incorporated into the pier niches of New

St. Peter’s. Bernini’s columns seem to pulsate, and the dark bronze, accented with gilt, stands out

against the lighter marble of the nave and apse. Such contrasts of light and dark, like the organic

quality of the undulating columns, are characteristic of Baroque.

St. Peter’s

St. Peter’s basilica and piazza, Vatican, Rome. Maderno, facade, 1607–26; Gianlorenzo Bernini, piazza design, c. 1656–57.

In 1656 Bernini began the exterior of St. Peter’s. His goal was to provide an impressive approach to

the church and to define the Piazza San Pietro. The piazza, or public square ,is where the faithful

gather during Christian festivals to hear the pope’s message and receive his blessing. Bernini

conceived of the piazza as a large open space, organized into elliptical and trapezoidal shapes (in

contrast to the Renaissance circle and square). He used Classical Orders and combined them with

statues of Christian saints. He divided the piazza into two parts . The columns are four deep, and the

colonnades end in temple fronts on either side of a large opening. Crowds can thus convene and

disperse easily; they are enclosed but not confined. Bernini compared the curved colonnades to the

arms of St. Peter’s, the Mother Church, spread out to embrace the faithful. The second part of the

piazza is a trapezoidal area connecting the oval with the church façade. The trapezoid lies on an

upward gradient, and the visitor approaches the portals of St. Peter’s by a series of steps. As a result,

the walls defining the north and south sides of the trapezoid become shorter toward the façade. This

enhances the verticality of the façade and offsets the horizontal emphasis produced by the

incomplete flanking towers. The two sections of the piazza are tied together by an Ionic entablature

that extends all the way around the sides of both the oval and the trapezoid, and the entablature is

crowned by a balustrade with marble statues of saints. The integration of the architecture with the

participating crowds reflects the Baroque taste for involving audiences in a created space, in

particular a processional space leading to a high altar.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Gardner’s Art through the Ages: The Western Perspective, Fourteenth Edition, Volume II

by Fred S. Kleiner

2. A history of western art / Laurie Schneider Adams. —5th ed

3. www.britannica.com

4. www.visual-arts-cork.com