BU FE450
description
Transcript of BU FE450
-
WARREN RESOURCES (WRES.) - LBO FINAL PROJECT
May 4th, 2015
Kevin NgJames Jinghong Yu
Tinna Xinyuan Zhang
-
Agenda
BUSINESS MODEL SHOULD AN LBO BE DONE?
LBO CHARACTERISTICS INDUSTRY
COMPANY
PURCHASE PRICE CONSIDERATIONS
CAPITAL STRUCTURE REASONING
SOURCES & BACKUP DATA
2Monday, May 04, 2015
-
SHOULD AN LBO BE DONE? Advantages: Natural gas and crude oil prices are currently at a 10-year low
Potentially an opportunity to take undervalued companies from short-sighted investors
Oil & natural gas prices rebound amplifies EBITDA growth and overall return (see oil & natural gas prices outlook slide 16-17)
Provides the company with greater flexibility to capitalize on potential growth opportunities or protect itself should energyprices continue to drop
Transaction actually reduces the total leverage and interest payments
Aligns incentives with management to stay and grow the company
Sponsor can bring greater industry expertise and recruit talent for the company
Disadvantages: Inherent risk in a company that has revenue primarily dependent on energy commodity prices
Requires a large equity commitment upfront from the sponsor and a committed management team
Operational expertise is required to manage growth through constantly fluctuating industry and talent is not always available or easy to find
Given current capital market conditions, although there is cheaper financing, a higher TEV multiple will also have to be paidso multiple expansion is extremely unlikely
3Monday, May 04, 2015
-
LBO CHARACTERISTICSINDUSTRY PROS
High growth industry, primarily driven by the US shale oil boom Oil production growth 5-yr CAGR: 10.12% (surpassed Russia as the world's second largest crude
oil producer)
Natural gas production growth 5-yr CAGR: 4.51%
Barriers to entry are high Capital requirements and exclusive land lease ownerships prevent larger competitors from taking
business
Oil crisis makes it unprofitable for new players to enter and therefore threat of new entrants is low
A high level of technological expertise is required in exploring and developing oil & gas wells such as knowledge of tertiary recovery processes, flacking, and seismic surveying
Exploration companies possess more leverage in dealing with drilling companies Allows them to pass through price decreases over time since they own the land lease and drillers
need that right to be able to drill on the land
4Monday, May 04, 2015
-
LBO CHARACTERISTICSINDUSTRY (CONT.) CONS Cash flows are highly dependent on prices of crude oil and natural gas
Unpredictable revenues based on commodity prices, extremely market sensitive There is risk in generating consistent cash flows or even paying off interest for high debt levels in poor market
conditions Mitigated by effective use of options (collars and swap agreements) Mitigated by Warren Resources focus on increasing natural gas production after acquiring the Marcellus shale gas asset for
US$300m, given natural gas prices have a much more bullish outlook than crude oil and our conservative assumptions (based on futures prices) on natural gas price rebound (see slide 17)
High capital expenditure requirements Capital intensive business that requires a lot of capital expenditure for expansion and further development of oil
wells Mitigated by the fact that maintenance capital expenditures is low (shown in 2015E projections cutting expansion programs)
and if necessary, the company has enough reserves to continue drilling at the same rate for more than 10 years without additional expansion or development
Potential environmental litigation Mitigated by the fact that there is currently no ongoing or historical litigation that would result or has resulted in
material damages paid maximum litigation allowance in the past was only $3.1mm
Trending towards consolidation (BOTH positive and negative) 8 acquisitions (TV: 500-1,000MM) announced YTD There may be more strategic bidders to bid up the price in acquiring the company
Mitigated by antitrust laws and most energy companies cutting expansion from low energy prices
Small size of the company provides opportunities to get acquired by a strategic buyer as a potential exit
5Monday, May 04, 2015
-
LBO CHARACTERISTICSCOMPANY PROS Hurt by the oil crisis and is trading at a significant discount (see slide share price
performance slide 15)
Strong historical EBITDA and net income margins (See comps chart slide 19)
Ability to sell off underperforming assets if necessary
Management possesses a significant amount of industry experience, but is currently in transition with an interim CEO (BOTH positive and negative)
Vice presidents are all younger and have spent at least a decade at the company so there is a talent pipeline
Current interim CEO is from the acquisition of Marcellus Shale indicating management instability Mitigated by the assumption that the interim CEO would like to stay as permanent CEO given his age (only 54
with over 30 years of experience in the industry) provided proper incentives (options) He would be the person to grow the Marcellus Shale natural gas assets since he founded the company that it was
bought from (Citrus Energy) and knows of all the skeletons buried in the closet
Existing VP of Operations was previously the California drilling manager which means he is extremely experienced with oil production operations and can fill in gaps in knowledge of the interim CEO
6Monday, May 04, 2015
-
LBO CHARACTERISTICSCOMPANY (Cont.) CONS Customer concentration is extremely high
The largest three purchasers of Warrens total oil and gas production accounted for 98% of total oil and natural gas sold in 2014 Mitigated by the fact that refineries get their crude oil regionally since they need to build a pipeline to
receive it (large amounts infrastructure required), there is no risk of the wells being displaced by a cheaper competitor (extremely high switching costs)
There is no risk of losing all their business to another competitor, only reduced prices from market forces Robust domestic demand for crude oil
Might not be able to obtain a favorable credit rating Given the unpredictable revenues, high leverage, and small size for an oil company, the company
might not be able to get a credit rating that would allow the transaction to obtain financing at a favorable interest rate Mitigated by the large amount of collateral in PPE the company has, and previous capital structure is more
levered than the proposed transaction
Board is quite old (late 60s and 70s) and likely to retire soon (negative) Mitigated by the Sponsor likely to have many operational partners that will be able to serve as
independent directors for the company and bring a high level of industry expertise
7Monday, May 04, 2015
-
LBO CHARACTERISTICSCONCLUSION Industry:
Given the low energy prices and trend towards consolidation within the next few years, the oil and gas exploration and production industry is a stellar industry to obtain assets in at the moment. Companies in this industry have high barriers toentry with land leases holding the legal right to drill for oil and bargaining power over drillers and refineries. Although theymust continue to pump oil at depressed prices in the current market, should crude oil and natural gas prices recover as predicted by projections and future prices, companies in this industry would experience explosive growth.
Company:
This company is a decent growth management buyout play for sponsors with expertise in the energy sector that can not only fill the potential gaps in the management team, but also provide guidance for integration of new natural gas assets. This company has a lot more reserves than its competitors for its size (see WRES reserve slide) and therefore has the ability to cut down on capital expenditures and still be able to produce at the same rate for over a decade. Given its recent acquisition ofMarcellus Shale, the company also has an enormous opportunity to expand natural gas production, being able to amplify the returns should energy prices recover. Given its small size for an oil company, there are also more exit opportunities available to larger strategic buyers seeking to acquire more reserves. A sale to financial buyer or an IPO are also feasible exit opportunities given the right market conditions. A dividend recapitalization is unlikely since the interest on additional borrowing is so low,there is no reason for the company to deliver. In fact, since it is a growth play, there will likely be additional borrowing for acquisitions or capital expenditures.
Winners of the transaction: Sponsor, management, current and future creditors, investors
Losers of transaction: Competitors, underperforming operational staff
8Monday, May 04, 2015
-
PURCHASE PRICE CONSIDERATIONS Purchase price is the final bid we assume will allow the sponsor to acquire Warren Resources with the
following assumptions: Common equity will be purchased at a 34.8% control premium
Given the favorable industry and small size of the company, there will be more strategic buyers bidding if it is put into play which is why a management buyout is critical
Capital markets are still frothy given low interest rates so availability of money will likely push the purchase price up so it is doubtful that we will be able to acquire the company below a 30% premium
All debt and preferred shares will be prepaid at the premium given in the credit agreements
Management will be a partner in the transaction and will be rolling over 100% of their equity Enormous option plan (almost the same size as their rollover) Interim CEO has the incentive to cooperate since he will be able to continue to work with the assets his company owned
for the last 25+ years VP of Operations possesses deep operational knowledge of developed company assets and will want to stay with the
company since he has spent the majority of his career here
3% of the purchase price as a transaction fee is reasonable (2% financing/underwriting, 1% other advisory)
9Monday, May 04, 2015
-
CAPITAL STRUCTURE REASONING Proposed capital structure will likely have a reduced revolver commitment at a higher cost than currently due to weaker energy
prices (therefore less expansion potential as shown in 2015E projections)
Still an extremely large revolver as sponsor will want to maximize flexibility to adjust for strategy based on how oil and natural gas prices recover (large capital expenditure requirements for expansion or used to pay interest if continually low prices)
Draw-down an additional $15.3mm in the revolver (compared to current balance) to pay for the transaction due to the low cost of debt
Low rate indicates that the credit line is an asset based loan collateralized by the companys PPE
Higher revolver cost due to likely lower demand for Warrens PPE from weak energy prices (therefore reducing the potential liquidation value and collateral coverage)
Senior subordinated debt is more appropriate for the situation over mezzanine due to lower cost
If necessary, company can draw down on the revolver to pay off interest payments
Size of the amount of debt is high for mezzanine but fits into senior subordinated range which tends to be $150mm or more
In the current capital structure (not pro forma), company has $300mm of subordinated debt used for an acquisition so getting a $250mm commitment should not be an issue despite weakening capital market conditions
Estimated to come in at around 8.75% since the pro forma capital structure is slightly less levered
Good for the company in that the debt costs less compared to mezzanine PIK notes, bad in the sense that it ties down more cash flow for cash interest payments
10Monday, May 04, 2015
-
CAPITAL STRUCTURE REASONING (CONT.)
Estimated required equity is at least 35% based on the middle-market size of the company and risk of energy price fluctuations
Higher equity requirements would show lenders that the sponsor has enough skin in the game but given the large amount of collateral and nature of the industry, a 36% equity contribution is likely sufficient to obtain commitments (especially since it was 22% previously)
5.2x total leverage is in range with leveraged lending guidelines for 1Q15 - 2Q15 Lead Left Capital Markets Review
TEV will come in at 8.1x which is high but not unreasonable given the competitive dynamics, current low energy prices, and potential for growth (see comps slide 19)
11Monday, May 04, 2015
-
SOURCES & BACKUP DATA
12Monday, May 04, 2015
-
Oil & Gas Exploration and Production Industry Definition
Industry firms engage in the exploration and extraction of crude petroleum and natural gas. The industry also consists of the recovery of butane, ethane and natural liquefied petroleum gases (LPG) recovered from oil and gas fields
13Monday, May 04, 2015
-
Company Snapshot Warren Resources
Warren Resources primarily engages in:
Oil drilling and recovery in California Wilmington field
Raw natural gas extraction in Wyoming & Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale
Owns natural gas and oil leasehold interests in approximately 529 gross (366 net) producing wells and estimated net proved reserves of 71.3 MMBoe
Sources: Companies 10-K report
Recent Development
Expanding natural gas sales through acquisition of Natural gas assets from subsidiaries of Anadarko Petroleum in 2012 Marcellus (shale gas) assets from Citrus Energy in July
Revenue from oil and gas sales has grown at a 3 year CAGR of 13.4% and increased 17% during 2014, mainly driven by increases in gas production
Net income in 2014, 24 million, declined 20.9% from 2013 due to drop in oil and natural gas prices
63.83%
32.66%
3.52%
2014 Revenue Brteakdown by Segments
Oil Revenue Nat Gas Revenue Transportation Revenue
Business Overview
14Monday, May 04, 2015
-
Warren Resources Share Price Performance to DateWRES Share Price Performance
0
50
100
150
200
250
Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15
Re
bas
ed t
o 1
00
WRES S&P 500
Peak: $6.66
Acquisition of Marcellus Assets Announced ($313M)
$300 million 9% Senior Notes
15Monday, May 04, 2015
-
Crude Oil Prices Outlook WTI Crude Oil Price (US$/Barrel)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
$ p
er
bar
rel
Historic Price
Futures Prices
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Cu
mu
lati
ve %
ch
ange
Crude Oil Demand
Crude Oil Supply
0
100
200
300
400
500
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
WTI Crude Oil Prices have dropped to $51/bbl, Low oil for longer period of time will prompt E&P firms to cut spending (Capex)
Rig count in America in mid-February fell to its lowest since 2011, and was 35% below its peak in Oct, 2014
U.S. crude oil inventories rose to a record 425.6 million barrels and is expected to grow further in 2015
Domestic crude oil output will likely be resilient in 2015 U.S. volume may increase 8% to 9.3 million barrels this
year, based on EIA data
U.S Crude Oil Inventory Levels (MMBL)
16Monday, May 04, 2015
-
Natural Gas Prices Outlook Natural gas prices declined 22% during 2014, but prices are expected to have a
positive outlook due to
Severely cold weather
Favorable demand & supply outlook
Obama plans to increase natural gas exports to drive job growth
Natural gas demand rose 13.0% yoy, mainly driven by industrial and power sector
Futures contract indicates that natural gas price will rise to $3.1/cf in 2015, slightly lower than the $3.3/cf consensus
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Bcf
U.S Natural Gas Inventory (Bcf)
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Cu
mu
lati
ve %
ch
ange
Nat Gas Supply
Nat Gas Demand
Global Demand Vs. Supply (%change)
Natural Gas Prices (US$/Cf)
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
$ p
er
cf
Historic Price
Futures Contract Price
17Monday, May 04, 2015
-
WRES Proved Reserves
WRES is significantly cheaper than its peers based on Enterprise Value/Proved Developed BOE, given its large amount of proved reserves
Partially due to slower relative growth in reserves of its comparables
18Monday, May 04, 2015
-
Comp Co & Comp M&AComp Co
CompanyMarket Cap
(12/31/2014)Sales Growth EBITDA Margin Net Margin (%) EV/EBITDA
US$m 3 Yr Avg (%) (%) (%) FY 2014A
Warren Resources 123 12.60% 63.24% 13.79% 7.55x
Northern Oil and Gas 344 91.57% 73.06% 13.66% 3.72x
Comstock Resources 317 7.41% 79.62% -0.18% 6.49x
Bill Barrett 552 -4.61% 59.27% -5.64% 5.15x
Penn Virginia 460 14.89% 63.83% -1.36% 5.11x
Swift Energy 177 11.71% 64.04% 0.70% 10.45x
Unit Corp 1,674 16.20% 48.83% 13.83% 6.98x
High 91.57% 79.62% 13.83% 10.45x
75th 15.87% 70.81% 10.42% 6.86x
Mean 22.86% 64.78% 3.50% 6.32x
Median 13.30% 63.94% 0.26% 5.82x
25th 8.48% 60.41% -1.07% 5.12x
Low -4.61% 48.83% -5.64% 3.72x
Comp M&A
Announcement Date Status Target Company Acquirer TV (US$ MM) TV/EBITDA
4/20/2015 Pending LRR Energy LPVanguard Natural Resources 251 9.37x
19Monday, May 04, 2015