Brand Laddering
Transcript of Brand Laddering
1
Quantitative LadderingQuantitative LadderingThe model, the implementation, the analysis
2
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
The Customers’ behavior observed
The Customers’ needs expressed in their own terms
Laddering methodologyLaddering methodologyWhat is the Voice of the Customer?What is the Voice of the Customer?
3
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Laddering methodologyLaddering methodologyDefinitionDefinition
� Laddering is a combination of qualitative and quantitative techniques who analyze features, benefits and values from service or product/concept.
� The result of a laddering survey is a map showing how features are linked to benefits and values. So we get the picture, it is an aggregated picture from a qualitative survey. This has to be validated and should enable us to link the individual choices to the ladders (links between features-benefits-values).
4
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
ValuesValues
BenefitsBenefits
FeaturesFeatures
Laddering methodologyLaddering methodologyThe modelThe model
Using laddering, you can uncover what drives the consumer to purchase a certain brand and reveal, at the same time, what is the best way to address this consumer to convince him to buy your product!
5
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
ValuesValues
BenefitsBenefits
FeaturesFeatures
ProductAttributes
Fuel consumption
Modern design
Price
TOYOTA CAR
Benefits(consequences)
to the person
Emotions and values
PERSON:CAR DRIVER
BrandBrand
Laddering methodologyLaddering methodologyAn exampleAn example
6
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Laddering methodologyLaddering methodologyA typical laddering interviewA typical laddering interview
(The interviewer has established that fuel economy (low fuel consumption) is the most important car attribute)
Q. You stated that fuel economy is important to you. Why is that?
A. Use as little as possible. Cut down on pollution.
Q. Can you explain to me why you care about cutting down on pollution?
A. The atmosphere is fouled enough and I should do my bit. We must all be greener.
Q. And if you are not greener? What are the consequences for you then?
A. I have an obligation to for future generations. It just is part of my ethic – I feel responsible.
Q. Why is this important for you? What is your ‘benefit’ in this?
A. Makes me feel good. To be happy!
7
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Laddering methodologyLaddering methodologyA typical laddering analysisA typical laddering analysis
Value
Feel goodMakes me feel good. To be happy!
Consequence
Less pollutionUse as litt le as possible. Cut down on pollut ion
Characteristic
Fuelconsumption
Fuel economy is a very important car characteristic for me
Consequence
We must be‘greener’
The atmosphere is fouled and I should do my bit. We must all be greener
Consequence
Obligation tonext generation
I have an obligation for future generations. It’s just part of my ethic -I feel responsible
Individual Individual meansmeans --endend
chainchain
8
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Laddering methodologyLaddering methodologyA typical laddering analysisA typical laddering analysis
Individual Individual meansmeans --endend
chainchain
Feel good
Budget
Spendmoney on
otherthings
Fuelconsump.
corresp.to personality
Modernlook
Financialsecurity
Selfexpression
Price
Value f . money
9
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Toyota Toyota Yaris Yaris VersoVerso
Like to be comfortable
Self fulfilment
Large interior
Avoid stress
‘I can feel comfortable in the car’‘I like comfort and well-being’‘I need a car which although small has room for me’‘To feel well inside’
‘To feel more relaxed’‘I feel at ease’‘I don’t want to feel tired’‘I don’t like getting crazy about things’
‘I feel as if my life is fulfilled’‘I’m great!’‘I want to be able to be proud of myself’
Laddering methodologyLaddering methodologyA typical laddering analysisA typical laddering analysis
Care for family
Drive comfortably
Performance
Many thingsto transportfor family
Large interior
Transportmany things
Family / child friendly
Toyota Toyota Yaris Yaris VersoVerso
Everybody needs to feel comfortableThe whole atmosphere is more relaxed and friendly
I want to be able to transport bigger things when necessary
We've recently had another child so we need a bigger carI must think of my family when I buy a carIt has to fit the whole family
I have a family, we always take a lot of luggage with us, need space
My family is the most important thing in my lifeChildren and family are the main things in my life
10
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Laddering methodologyLaddering methodologyA typical laddering analysisA typical laddering analysis
Feel good
Budget
Spendmoney on
otherthings
Fuelconsump.
youngsingles/couples
families
empty nesters
corresp.to personality
Selfexpression
modernlook
Safe
Survival
Peaceof
mind
Feeling protected
Financialsecurity
11
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Laddering methodologyLaddering methodologyA typical laddering analysisA typical laddering analysis
Feel good
Budget
Spendmoney on
otherthings
Fuelconsump.
Financialsecurity
Price
Value f. money
Respondents who do not consider
Toyota Yaris
Respondents who consider Toyota
Yaris
12
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Laddering methodologyLaddering methodologyA typical laddering analysisA typical laddering analysis
Avoid stress
Consumerbenefits
Message elements
Driving force
Family/childfriendly
Care for family
Performance
Drive comfortably
MODELPOSITIONINGSTRATEGY
Large interior
Transport manythings
Self fulfilment
Personal relevance Bridge: On the one handthe car complies with the transport needs of ayoung family
Value Bridge: and on the other hand the owner of the Yaris Verso takes a definite stand concerning the styling
Product Bridge: The new Toyota YarisVerso is a new, compact Toyota withstyle, which offers the necessary spaceand performance, especially for youngfamilies
13
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
ReferencesReferences
- Claeys, C., Vanden Abeele, P.: Consumers’ means-end chains for “think” and “feel” pro ducts ; International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, pp. 193-208, 1995
- Hofstede, F, Audenaert, A, Steenkamp, J.B.E.M, Wedel, M: An investigation into the association pattern technique as quantitative approach to measu ring means-end chain , International
Journal of Research in Marketing, 1998.
- Kenett, R. and Zacks, S.: Modern Industrial Statistics , Duxbury Press: San Francisco, 1998
- Fuchs C. and Kenett, R.: Multivariate Quality Control , M. Dekker: New York, 1998
- Izard, C.A.: Human Emotions . Plenum Press New York, 1977.
- Reynolds, T.J., Gengler, C.E., Howard D.J.:A means-end analysis of brand persuasion through advertising ; international journal of research in marketing 12 (October 1995) pg 257-266
- Reynolds, T.J. and Gutman, J: Laddering theory, method, analysis and interpretati on .; Journal of advertising research , pp 11-13, 1988
- Sukhdial, A.S., Chakraborty, G., Steger, E.K., Measuring values can sharpen segmentation in the luxury auto market ; Journal of Advertising Research, pp. 9-22, 1995
14
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Designing an internal Help DeskDesigning an internal Help Deskwith quantitative ladderingwith quantitative laddering
15
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
A Survey of Company ValuesA Survey of Company Values
4022D5Collaboration
13355D4Excellence
13634D3Result Driven
12435D2Customer First
10235D1Can Do
5221D7Respect for Ind.
6510D6Accountability
TOTALTo be improved
Best Feature
Most ImportantCodeCompany Values
16
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Correspondence Analysis OverviewCorrespondence Analysis Overview
Correspondence analysis is a statistical visualization method for picturing the associations between the levels of a two-way contingency table. The name is a translation of the French "Analyses des Correspondances", where the term ‘correspondance’ denotes a “system of associations”between the elements of two sets. In a two-way contingency table, the observed association of two traits is summarized by the cell frequencies. A typical inferential aspect is the study of whether certain levels of one characteristic are associated with some levels of another. Correspondence analysis displays the rows and columns of a two-way contingency table as points in a low-dimensional space, such that the positions of the row and column points are consistent with their associations in the table. The goal is to have a global view of the data that is useful for interpretation.
17
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Component 1
Component 2
1.00.50.0-0.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
To be improved
Best COMVERSE Values
Most Important
Respect for Ind.
Accountability
Collaboration
Excellence
Result DrivenCustomer First
Can Do
Symmetric Plot
Company Values AnalysisCompany Values Analysis
Most Important:Most Important:
> Can do
> Customer first
To be improvedTo be improved :
> Result Driven
BestBest :
> Excellence
Correspondence analysis of Company Values’ contingen cy table by category
18
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
A Survey of Personal ValuesA Survey of Personal Values
2200C6Reliability
4031C5Quality
2020C3Customer information
21849C2Effectiveness - Efficiency
14545C1Customer satisfaction
TOTALTo be improved
Best Feature
Most ImportantCodeValues
19
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Personal Values Personal Values –– Most ImportantMost Important
Effectiveness/efficiency and customer satisfaction are the most important values (93.3%)
Count
Percent
Values
Count
0.0
Cum % 60.0 93.3 100.0 100.0
9 5 1 0
Percent 60.0 33.3 6.7
Other
Quality
Custom
er satisfaction
Effectiveness - Efficiency
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
Pareto Chart of Values
20
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Personal Values Personal Values –– BestBest
Customer satisfaction and Effectiveness/efficiency and customer satisfaction are the best value (61.5%)
Count
Percent
Values
Count
23.1 15.4 0.0
Cum % 30.8 61.5 84.6 100.0 100.0
4 4 3 2 0
Percent 30.8 30.8
Other
Custom
er information
Quality
Effectiveness - Efficiency
Custom
er satisfaction
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
Pareto Chart of Values
21
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Personal Values Personal Values –– To be ImprovedTo be Improved
Effectiveness/efficiency and customer satisfaction need to be improved (86.7%)
Count
Percent
Values
Count
0.0
Cum % 53.3 86.7 100.0 100.0
8 5 2 0
Percent 53.3 33.3 13.3
Other
Reliability
Custom
er satisfaction
Effectiveness - Efficiency
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
Pareto Chart of Values
22
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Component 1
Component 2
1.00.50.0-0.5-1.0-1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
To be improved
Best Personal Values
Most Important
Reliability
Quality
Customer information
Effectiveness - EfficiencyCustomer satisfaction
Symmetric Plot
Personal Values summaryPersonal Values summary
Most Important:Most Important:
> Effectiveness/efficiency
> Customer Satisfaction
To be improvedTo be improved :
> Effectiveness/efficiency
> Customer Satisfaction
BestBest :
> Quality
Correspondence analysis of Personal Values’ continge ncy table by category
23
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
BenefitsBenefits
1100B13Resource allocation
1001B11User's motivation
3012B10Work flow
3021B9Tec. Knowledge
2200B8Customer satisfaction
3030B6Ability to listen
2011B5Quality
12246B2Understanding customer & business needs
201145B1Efficiency
TOTALTo be improved
Best Feature
Most ImportantCodeBenefits
24
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
BenefitsBenefits
Count
Percent
Benefit
Count
12.5 6.3 0.0
Cum % 68.8 81.3 93.8 100.0 100.0
11 2 2 1 0
Percent 68.8 12.5
Other
resource allocation
Und. Customer & BU needs
Customer satisfaction
Efficiency
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
Pareto Chart of To be improved Benefits
Efficiency needs to be improved (68.8%)
Count
Percent
Benefit
Count
26.7 26.7 20.0 13.3 6.7 6.7 0.0
Cum % 26.7 53.3
4
73.3 86.7 93.3 100.0 100.0
4 3 2 1 1 0
Percent
Other
Work flow
Quality
Tec. Knowledge
Ability to listen
Und. Customer & BU needs
Efficiency
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
Pareto Chart of Best Benefits
Efficiency and understanding Customer &
Business needs and are best benefits (53.3%)
Count
Percent
Benefit
Count
37.5 31.3 12.5 6.3 6.3 6.3 0.0
Cum % 37.5 68.8
6
81.3 87.5 93.8 100.0 100.0
5 2 1 1 1 0
Percent
Other
User's motivation
Tec. Knowledge
Quality
Work flow
Effi ciency
Und. Customer & BU needs
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
Pareto Chart of Most important Benefits
Understanding Customer & Business needs and
efficiency are the most important benefits (68.8%)
25
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Benefits summaryBenefits summary
Component 1
Component 2
1.00.50.0-0.5-1.0-1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
To be improv ed
Best Benefit
Most Important
resource allocation
User's motiv ation
Work flow
Tec. Know ledge
C ustomer satisfaction
Ability to listen
Q uality
Und. C ustomer & BU needs
Efficiency
Symmetric Plot
Most Important:Most Important:
> Workflow
> Understanding Customer needs
>Quality
To be improvedTo be improved :
> Efficiency
> Resource allocation
> Customer Satisfaction
BestBest :
> Tech. Knowledge
> Ability to listen
Correspondence analysis of Benefits’ contingency tab le by category
26
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
A Survey of Help Desk FeaturesA Survey of Help Desk Features
3021A13Willingness to assist
3120A11Level of knowledge
1001A10Flexibility
1100A9Awareness for previous calls
7502A8Response time to solution
4130A7Availability
1100A6Customer training
5221A4Response time to answer
3300A3Quality of solution
8215A2Understanding needs
12147A1Professionalism
TOTALTo be improved
Best Feature
Most ImportantCodeFeature
27
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
FeaturesFeatures
Count
Percent
Feature
Count 0
Percent 41.2 17.6 11.8 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9
7
0.0
Cum % 41.2 58.8 70.6 76.5 82.4 88.2 94.1 100.0
3
100.0
2 1 1 1 1 1
Other
Professionalism
Level of knowledge
Custom
er training
Awareness for previous calls
Availability
Understanding needs
Quality of solution
Response time to solution
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
Pareto Chart of To be improved Features
Response time to solution is the major feature to be
improved (41.2%)
Count
Percent
Feature
Count
28.6 21.4 14.3 14.3 14.3 7.1 0.0
Cum % 28.6 50.0
4
64.3 78.6 92.9 100.0 100.0
3 2 2 2 1 0
Percent
Other
Understanding needs
Willingness to assist
Response time to answer
Level of knowledge
Availabil ity
Professionalism
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
Pareto Chart of Best Features
Professionalism and availability are best features
(50%)
Count
Percent
Feature
Count
29.4 17.6 5.9 5.9 0.0
Cum % 41.2 70.6 88.2 94.1
7
100.0 100.0
5 3 1 1 0
Percent 41.2
Other
Will ingness to assist
Flexibi lity
Response time to solution
Understanding needs
Professionalism
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
Pareto Chart of Most Important Features
Professionalism and Understanding needs are most
important features (70.6%)
28
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Features summaryFeatures summary
Component 1
Component 2
1.51.00.50.0-0.5-1.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
-1.0
To be improved
Best Feature
Most Important
Willingness to assist
Level of knowledge
Flexibility
Awareness for previous calls
Response time to solution
AvailabilityCustomer training
Response time to answerQuality of solution
Understanding needs
Professionalism
Symmetric PlotMost Important:Most Important:
> Understanding needs
> Professionalism
To be improvedTo be improved :
> Response time to solution
> Quality Solution
> Awareness of previous calls
> Customer training
BestBest :
> Willingness to assist
> Level of knowledge
> Availability
Correspondence analysis of Features’ contingency tab le by category
29
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
MeansMeans --End ChainsEnd Chains
� Help Desk Means-End Chains � Most important� Best � To be improved
30
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Help Desk MeansHelp Desk Means --End ChainsEnd ChainsMost ImportantMost Important
31
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Help Desk MeansHelp Desk Means --End ChainsEnd ChainsBestBest
32
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Help Desk MeansHelp Desk Means --End ChainsEnd ChainsTo be ImprovedTo be Improved
33
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Take Away MessageTake Away Message
Time to solution
EfficiencyUnderstanding the customer*
Professionalism
Efficiency vs. effectiveness balance
Customer First
Can Do
To be improved Preserve
34
©© 2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved2009, KPA Ltd., all rights reserved
Thank YouThank You