BP Inspector Vetting Seminar 25 th October 2007 INTERTANKO Ship Owners’ Perspective
27
BP Inspector Vetting Seminar 25 th October 2007 INTERTANKO Ship Owners’ Perspective Capt Howard Snaith: Director Marine, Ports Terminal & Chemical Section
-
Upload
vance-morrison -
Category
Documents
-
view
60 -
download
4
description
BP Inspector Vetting Seminar 25 th October 2007 INTERTANKO Ship Owners’ Perspective Capt Howard Snaith: Director Marine, Ports Terminal & Chemical Section. MISSION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of BP Inspector Vetting Seminar 25 th October 2007 INTERTANKO Ship Owners’ Perspective
BP Inspector Vetting Seminar 25th October 2007
INTERTANKO
Ship Owners’ Perspective
Capt Howard Snaith: Director Marine, Ports Terminal & Chemical Section
MISSION “Provide leadership to the Tanker
Industry in serving the world with safe, environmentally sound and efficient
seaborne transportation of oil, gas and chemical products.”
VISION for the TANKER INDUSTRY
“A responsible, sustainable and respected Tanker Industry, committed to
continuous improvement and constructively influencing its future.”
1. INTERTANKO
INTERTANKO Goals
1. Be the representative forum of choice for all quality tanker owners and managers.
2. Enhance public and political awareness of the importance and positive performance of the tanker industry.
3. Promote balanced terms of trade and a competitive, transparent and sustainable tanker industry.
4. Lead the development, acceptance and implementation of uniform, worldwide international tanker standards
5. Lead in establishing and maintaining partnerships, cooperation and open and constructive dialogue with the relevant maritime authorities, organizations, associations and special interest groups.
1. INTERTANKO
1. INTERTANKO
INTERTANKO Members Goals
• Zero Detentions
• Zero Pollution
• Zero Fatalities
Annual General MeetingSecretary: Kristian Fuglesang
CouncilSecretary: Minerva Alfonso
Associate Members CommitteeSecretary: Gunnar A. Knudsen
Bunker Sub-Committee Secretary: Dragos Rauta
Chemical Tanker Committee (CTC) Secretary: Howard N. Snaith
Chemical Tanker Sub-Committee Americas Secretary: Margaret Doyle & Howard Snaith
Human Element in Shipping CommitteeSecretary: Howard Snaith & Fredrik Larsson,
Documentary Committee Secretary: John Fawcett-Ellis
Environmental Committee Secretary: Tim Wilkins
Insurance & Legal Committee Secretary: John Fawcett-Ellis
Executive CommitteeSecretary: Minerva Alfonso
INTERTANKO Safety, Technical and Environmental Committee (ISTEC) Secretary: Dragos Rauta, Howard Snaith, Tim Wilkins, Fredrik Larsson
IT Committee Secretary: Minerva Alfonso
Offshore Tanker Committee (Former Shuttle Tanker Committee) Secretary: Dragos Rauta
Short Sea Tanker Group Secretary: Erik Ranheim
Vetting Committee Secretary: Howard N. Snaith
Worldscale Committee Secretary: Kristian R. Fuglesang
ASIAN REGIONAL PANEL Secretary: Tim Wilkins
HELLENIC FORUM Secretary: Bill Box
LATIN AMERICAN PANEL Secretary: Joe Angelo
NORTH AMERICAN PANEL Secretary: Joe Angelo
Q-Quest Sub-CommitteeSecretary: Howard Snaith
Management CommitteeSecretary: Peter Swift
Shipowner Issues Sub-Committee
Secretary: Peter Swift
Governance Structure
14 Committees4 Regional Panels
Example:
INTERTANKO’s Vetting Committee • 20 Members
• Provide mandate for INTERTANKO position on Vetting & PSC issues
Vetting Committee Issues & Work Program:•Tanker Officer Training Standard WG (TOTS)•Terminal Vetting Database WG•Vetting Clause WG•TMSA Working Group•Detention Statistics & Age WG•SIRE Inspector WG•Officer Matrix WG•Vetting Publication WG•Age of The vessel•ILO 180 & STCW Hours of Work & Rest
1. INTERTANKO
Tanker Safety Record
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
War
Hull & Machinery
Fire/Expl
Grounded
Coll/Contact
Misc.
Pollution - bars
2007 projection based on data 8m07
Commercial Vetting Inspection
Vetting Inspection Feedback FormsVetting Inspection Feedback Forms
• Based on comments and cooperation with our membership, The Based on comments and cooperation with our membership, The INTERTANKO Vetting Committee developed a Standard Inspection INTERTANKO Vetting Committee developed a Standard Inspection Feedback form several years ago.Feedback form several years ago.
• The purpose of this form is to supply confidential information that The purpose of this form is to supply confidential information that can be used in a constructive & statistical manner to assist in our can be used in a constructive & statistical manner to assist in our ongoing discussions with Port State Control, Oil Major Vetting ongoing discussions with Port State Control, Oil Major Vetting Departments, and establishments such as CDI and SIRE.Departments, and establishments such as CDI and SIRE.
• Part 1 of the questionnaire relates to Commercial Vetting Part 1 of the questionnaire relates to Commercial Vetting Inspections, (Part 2 relates to Port State Control inspections & Inspections, (Part 2 relates to Port State Control inspections & forms a separate presentation).forms a separate presentation).
• We encourage INTERTANKO members to supply their vessels with We encourage INTERTANKO members to supply their vessels with a copy of this form with the request that the forms be completed a copy of this form with the request that the forms be completed for each inspection as appropriate.for each inspection as appropriate.
• We also request that these forms be completed on each occasion We also request that these forms be completed on each occasion that a commercial or PSC inspection takes place whether the that a commercial or PSC inspection takes place whether the results are positive or negative.results are positive or negative.
INTERTANKO INTERTANKO Vetting Inspection FormVetting Inspection Form
Commercial Vetting Inspection
Q1: Did the inspector observe all safety precautions during the inspection?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A
2003 2004 2005 2006
Commercial Vetting Inspection
Q2: Did the inspector conduct the inspection according to OCIMF/CDI/VIQ?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A
2003 2004 2005 2006
Commercial Vetting Inspection
Q3: Did the inspector use a different or additional questionnaire other than the VIQ?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A
2003 2004 2005 2006
Commercial Vetting Inspection
Q4: Did the inspector discuss any observations found before leaving the vessel?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A
2003 2004 2005 2006
Commercial Vetting Inspection
Q5: Did the inspector change his opinion due to disussions of the observations?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A
2003 2004 2005 2006
Commercial Vetting Inspection
Q6: Did the inspector leave a copy of his observations onboard?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A
2003 2004 2005 2006
Commercial Vetting Inspection
Q8: Did the inspector act in an objective manner?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A
2003 2004 2005 2006
Commercial Vetting Inspection
Q9: Did the observations left onboard match those contained in the SIRE or other final inspection report?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A
2003 2004 2005 2006
Commercial Vetting Inspection
Q11. Did the observations reflect accurately the state of the vessel at the time?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A Yes No N/A
2003 2004 2005 2006
A Pertinent Comment to bear in Mind
“It is accepted that interested parties wish to assure their corporate reputations and they have a right to expect their contractor to use their best endeavors to attain that level of service…but …the standard of observations needs to be maintained”.
Additional Feedback to Consider
Ask the Question not what you think the Question is.
Utilise your experience, keep observations factual explanatory and not
interpretations.
Additional Feedback to Consider
“Yes” or “No” Answers by Inspectors:
As stand alone answers these can cause difficulties for the
owner/operator if these are without suitable qualification.
Additional Feedback to Consider
The Benefits of the Close out Meeting:
- The inclusion of additional comments after the inspection; the number of observations/comments do tend to increase once the final report comes out, this;
• Lowers morale onboard • Defeats the object of the close out meeting;• Increases the possibilities of misunderstandings;• Diminishes respect from those onboard
Additional Feedback to Consider
The use of Cameras onboard Tankers!
How do you use Yours?
Terminal Vetting Database WG
In cooperation with BP • Issue:-
– Enhance Safety Ship/Shore Interface
• Aim:-– Check before– Report afterwards
• Objectives:-– Continual improvement– Terminal Interaction
Reports available on members website
Terminal Vetting Database
The Terminal Vetting Database upgraded & is now hosted by www.Q88.com in partnership with INTERTANKO (as approved by Council)
•Access restricted to members & associate members
•1 page report form
•Simple
•User Friendly
•Terminal Feedback
• Low Score reports of 1 or 2, INTERTANKO sends an automated email to the terminal requesting Terminal Comments
Thank you
