AN UPDATE ON THE FED BALANCE SHEET. BY JONATHAN BRICE THE FED THE FED THE FED.
Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
Transcript of Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
1/41
* EMBARGOED UNTIL Wednesday, May 4, 2011 at 8:05 A.M. Eastern Time OR UPON DELIVERY *
A Look Inside
a Key Economic Debate:
How Should Monetary Policy Respondto Price Increases Driven by
Supply Shocks?
Eric S. Rosengren
President & Chief Executive OfficerFederal Reserve Bank of Boston
Remarks to the Massachusetts Chapter of
NAIOP, the Commercial Real Estate
Development Association
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
2/41
* EMBARGOED UNTIL Wednesday, May 4, 2011 at 8:05 A.M. Eastern Time OR UPON DELIVERY *
The debate Id like to focus on today is the one over the likely impact of recent increases
in the prices of food and energy, and how monetary policy should respond.*
The Feds policy
stance, as you know, is currently very accommodative a stance that I believe is appropriate
given the tentative recovery and still-high unemployment. But with food and energy prices
rising, some observers think the Fed should shift its stance to less accommodation slowing
economic growth now to ensure we dont have undesirably high inflation in the future even
though current measures of core inflation (that is, inflation omitting volatile food and energy
prices) remain low by historical standards.
As the recovery continues albeit slowly several events have occurred that further
complicate the outlook for inflation and real economic activity. Political upheaval in the Middle
East has contributed to sharply higher oil prices. Severe weather has reduced harvests from
Russia to Australia, causing higher prices for many agricultural products. And Japans tragic
earthquake and tsunami caused not only terrible loss of life, but also disruption to a supply chain
that is increasingly global.
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
3/41
* EMBARGOED UNTIL Wednesday, May 4, 2011 at 8:05 A.M. Eastern Time OR UPON DELIVERY *
often use core measures as a guide to where overall inflation is most likely to go, our goal is to
stabilize overall inflation.
Allow me to preview one of my conclusions. Because my analysis suggests that recent
food and oil price increases have their roots in concerns about wheat harvests in Russia and oil
production in Libya and the like, I do not believe that monetary policy is the appropriate tool to
respond to these disruptions. While many observers see food and energy prices rising and
assume the Fed should tighten policy raise the cost of money and credit to head off inflation,
I would suggest taking a step back and recognizing that tighter U.S. monetary policy will do
nothing to stabilize Libyan oil production, reduce uncertainty about political stability in the rest
of the Middle East, or increase the wheat harvest in Russia.
In fact, tightening monetary policy solely in response to contractionary supply shocks
would likely make the impact of the shocks worse for households and businesses. To see why
this is so, it is important to keep in mind how supply shocks affect the economy.1
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
4/41
* EMBARGOED UNTIL Wednesday, May 4, 2011 at 8:05 A.M. Eastern Time OR UPON DELIVERY *
goods will depend importantly on how inflation expectations respond to the shock. If people
expect that food and energy prices will stabilize in other words, that the price shock will be
temporary and do not believe that the central bank will allow any long-run effect on inflation,
then the disruption to total inflation will likely be temporary and the total inflation rate will
eventually converge with the lower core inflation rate. Since 1986, this has largely been what
happened when we experienced these types of supply shocks as Ill illustrate in a moment with
some charts.
Alternatively, if expectations of inflation do rise in response to the supply shock, then
(nominal) wages and salaries across the economy will be pressured to increase over time to keep
pace. If that happens, the supply shock could affect prices throughout the economy not just
those that that were part of the initial supply shock. In this case, the core rate of inflation rises to
converge with the higher measure of total inflation. This was the U.S. experience in the 1970s,
for reasons Ill discuss in a moment.
We at the Fed need to very closely monitor the data to make sure that inflation remains
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
5/41
* EMBARGOED UNTIL Wednesday, May 4, 2011 at 8:05 A.M. Eastern Time OR UPON DELIVERY *
If the economic data continue to support this outlook then the current, accommodative
stance of monetary policy is appropriate, and can remain in place and continue to support
economic growth so that we continue to make progress toward our goals of returning to full
employment and a sustainable long-run inflation rate the two elements of the Federal Reserves
dual mandate from Congress.
The Impact of Recent Supply Shocks
Now that you know my basic take on this key and current economic debate, allow me
to flesh out my perspective with the supporting data and analysis. The full impact of the recent
shocks to supply that I mentioned at the outset will likely emerge over time. But clearly there
have been significant increases in a variety of food and energy prices. As Figure 1 illustrates,
the recent turmoil in the Middle East has contributed to a significant increase in oil prices, which
have risen to over $100 a barrel. This is well above the average of nearly $80 a barrel
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
6/41
* EMBARGOED UNTIL Wednesday, May 4, 2011 at 8:05 A.M. Eastern Time OR UPON DELIVERY *
after an oil supply shock. Prices at gas stations in Massachusetts are now around $4.00 a gallon,
yet most peoples need to drive cars has not changed much if at all. So income available for
buying other goods and services has been squeezed by the increase in oil prices.3
Some softness in measures of consumer confidence suggests that consumers tend to be
less confident about the future when oil prices rise. If consumers pull back spending as a result
of a supply shock, it has the potential to be a drag on the economy. The Boston Feds statistical
modeling suggests that a $20 increase in the price of a barrel of oil will shave roughly four-tenths
of a percentage point off the rate of economic growth over two years, and cause the
unemployment rate to be roughly two-tenths of a percentage point higher than it would be absent
the oil shock. While this is certainly not enough to completely stop the recovery, it does imply a
slowing down of its pace.
Oil is not the only commodity to experience price increases of late. A variety of
agricultural prices have also increased. For example, Figure 3 shows the movement of wheat
prices over the last decade Droughts in Russia flooding in Australia and increased demand in
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
7/41
* EMBARGOED UNTIL Wednesday, May 4, 2011 at 8:05 A.M. Eastern Time OR UPON DELIVERY *
Historical Experience with Supply Shocks
Supply shocks are not unique to this period. However, the evidence shows that the
economic impact of supply shocks on inflation has changed over time actually quite
dramatically. Figure 4 shows the inflation rate (total inflation and core, which again excludes
food and energy) since 1970. What is striking is the way the behavior of the two series differed
in the 1970 to 1985 period versus the period from 1986 to the present. The interplay of core and
total inflation is very, very different in the more recent period than it was in the former.
I realize that delving into topics like total and core inflation can seem a bit abstract. So
let me bring in something a bit straightforward energy prices and inflation. Figure 5 shows the
profound effect that energy prices had in the 1970s on core inflation. In the 1970s the lines
move up and down together as core inflation increased with energy prices. That is why my
earlier chart shows core and total inflation moving so closely in that era. But since 1986,
dramatic movements in energy prices have not affected core prices.
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
8/41
* EMBARGOED UNTIL Wednesday, May 4, 2011 at 8:05 A.M. Eastern Time OR UPON DELIVERY *
food and energy prices live up to their reputation for volatility. The spikes are tough on
households, to be sure. But importantly, total inflation eventually gravitates to the core measure
that excludes food and energy. Core inflation stays moored.
Figure 8 represents another way to use the available data to explore this relationship. It
too shows that the increases in total inflation in recent years have generally been temporary. For
each quarter from 1998 to 2010, the figure plots the difference between total inflation and core
inflation at the time, and the total inflation rate two years later. What it shows is that when there
is a supply shock such that total inflation (including food and energy) exceeds core inflation, two
years later total inflation tends to be lower when supply shocks such as oil prices drive up total
inflation relative to core, the total tends to come back down toward the core inflation rate.
Figure 9 performs similar analysis but focuses on the future core inflation rate, instead of
the total. It shows no strong relationship. When total and core inflation diverge, core inflation
tends to stay put. In other words, in recent years, when something like an oil shock causes total
inflation to diverge from core there was no consistent implication for the future core inflation
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
9/41
* EMBARGOED UNTIL Wednesday, May 4, 2011 at 8:05 A.M. Eastern Time OR UPON DELIVERY *
To digress, it is likely the case that supply shocks have become transitory because of the
way in which monetary policy has tended to respond. So, as long as monetary policy behaves
about as it has in recent years, then there is no reason to expect supply shocks to have lasting
effects.
So is Fed policy behaving as it has since the mid 1980s? Interestingly, although Fed
policy is perceived as exceptionally accommodative, because of hitting the zero lower bound the
federal funds rate is actually higher has come down less than would be expected if the Fed
behaved as it has over the last 25 years. The current level of the funds rate suggest that we have
been less accommodative in recent years given that interest-rate reductions (policy easing) ran
into at the zero lower bound.4
Why the Different Reaction to Supply Shocks Over Time?
But how confident should we be that the relationship we have experienced over the past
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
10/41
* EMBARGOED UNTIL Wednesday, May 4, 2011 at 8:05 A.M. Eastern Time OR UPON DELIVERY *
Figure 10 shows that the service sector has grown from a little over 60 percent of private
sector employment in 1970 to a little over 80 percent in 2010. As the economy has come to
emphasize services versus manufacturing, it may be that commodities (and thus their prices)
have become somewhat less important to the production of goods and services. And goods
prices are more volatile than services prices, and more likely to be priced like commodities.
Figure 11 shows the per capita consumption of oil declining in the United States.
Conservation measures by consumers and businesses have made the economy less dependent on
oil than in the 1970s. While oil remains a very important commodity, the trend towards reducing
dependence on oil provides greater insulation from oil-induced supply shocks.
Figure 12 shows the U.S. share of world oil consumption (in blue) ticking down, but also
clearly shows (in red) the steady climb in the share consumed by three of the so-called emerging-
market economies China, India, and Brazil. Figure 13 shows the growth in oil consumption in
those three countries, in the upper three lines. Both charts depict quite strikingly the heightened
demand for oil emanating from emerging markets
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
11/41
* EMBARGOED UNTIL Wednesday, May 4, 2011 at 8:05 A.M. Eastern Time OR UPON DELIVERY *
the next 10 years, at various points in time. Their expectations have declined somewhat over the
past 20 years, but what is striking is the relative stability of their inflation expectations. In
addition, there was no significant reaction to the oil price shock that we experienced in 2008.
The chart also shows a second measure of inflation expectations the University of Michigan
Survey (the green line), which asks respondents about their expectations for inflation over the
next 5 to 10 years6. Again these expectations are not very responsive to movements in oil prices,
and have remained quite stable over the past two decades.
It is worth noting that countries can be affected quite differently by supply shocks. As
Figure 16 shows, the importance of food in the basket of goods purchased by consumers can
vary greatly by country. In less developed countries, food is a very significant component of
overall purchases by consumers. In a developed country such as the United States, food is a
much smaller share of overall purchases. Thus the impact of a food-supply shock on the overall
inflation rate and on other important economic variables such as wages and total imports can
vary widely by country. Given the different impacts of supply shocks, it is not surprising that
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
12/41
* EMBARGOED UNTIL Wednesday, May 4, 2011 at 8:05 A.M. Eastern Time OR UPON DELIVERY *
Concluding Observations
In conclusion, I recognize that recent supply shocks have caused pressures on many
household budgets, and have led some analysts and observers to become concerned about
potential long-term inflationary impacts. However, I think the evidence shows that over the past
25 years most supply shocks have been transitory and have had no long-lasting imprint on
longer term inflation, or on inflation expectations.
Nonetheless, recent historical trends do not always continue, so it is important to monitor
inflation dynamics very closely to make sure that this pattern is continuing in the incoming data.
In particular, I will look intently at whether there is any evidence that the expectations of
underlying inflation have changed. To date, expectations seem quite stable and show no
evidence of diverging from the recent past. I am committed to responding decisively, and as
forcefully as necessary, to ensure that long-term inflation expectations remain stable and that
food and energy price increases are not passing through to other prices.7
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
13/41
* EMBARGOED UNTIL Wednesday, May 4, 2011 at 8:05 A.M. Eastern Time OR UPON DELIVERY *
quite low in relation to recent history, and has shown only a slight improvement over the course
of the recovery.
So with significant slack in labor markets, stable inflation expectations, and core inflation
well below our longer run target, there is currently no reason to slow the economy down with
tighter monetary policy. Until we make more progress on both elements of the Federal
Reserves mandate employment and inflation the current, accommodative stance of monetary
policy is appropriate.
Thank you.
NOTES:
1 My colleague Geoffrey Tootell, Director of Research at the Boston Fed, has prepared an illuminating public policy
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
14/41
* EMBARGOED UNTIL Wednesday, May 4, 2011 at 8:05 A.M. Eastern Time OR UPON DELIVERY *
control. Consequently, longer-term inflation expectations became unmoored, and nominal wages and prices spiraledupward as workers sought compensation for past price increases and as firms responded to accelerating labor costswith further increases in prices. That wage-price spiral was eventually arrested by the Federal Reserve underChairman Paul Volcker, but only at the cost of a severe recession in the early 1980s. Since then the Federal Reservehas remained determined to avoid these mistakes and to keep inflation low and stable.[http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/yellen20110411a.htm]
6 The average annual expected price change they expect over the next 5 to 10 years
7 See for example the comments on commodity price pressures and monetary policy by my colleague WilliamDudley, president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank and Vice Chair of the Federal Open Market Committee:
Inflation expectations are well-anchored today and we intend to keep it that way. A sustained rise in medium-terminflation expectations would represent a threat to our price stability mandate and would not be tolerated.[http://www.newyorkfed.org/newsevents/speeches/2011/dud110228.html]
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
15/41
How Should Monetary Policy
Respond to Price IncreasesDriven by Supply Shocks?
Eric S. RosengrenPresident & CEO
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
NAIOPBoston, Massachusetts
May 4, 2011
www.bostonfed.orgEMBARGOED UNTIL WEDNESDAY, MAY 4, 2011 8:05 A.M. EASTERN TIME OR UPON DELIVERY
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
16/41
The Debate
Whats the likely impact of increasing foodand energy prices?
How should monetary policy respond?
Accommodative monetary policy appropriategiven anemic recovery, high unemployment
Given food and energy prices, some say policy
should be less accommodative
2
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
17/41
New Supply Shocks
Political upheaval in the Middle East:higher oil prices
Severe weather affecting global harvests:
higher prices for agricultural products
Japans tragedy:
disruption in global supply chain
3
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
18/41
An Important Distinction
The Fed looks at all prices, including foodand energy, when developing policy
Core measures of inflation take out
volatile food and energy Often we use core as a guide to where
overall inflation is likely to go
But our goal is to stabilize overall inflation
4
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
19/41
Effects of a Supply Shock:Near Term
A supply shock can slow economic growth(reduces spending on other things)
Other prices may be initially unaffected
total inflation rises, but not core inflation
Monetary tightening would likely worsen the
shocks impact for households and businesses
5
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
20/41
Effects of a Supply Shock:Longer Term
Longer-run impact on other prices dependson how inflation expectations respond
If people expect its temporary and the central bank
will act, then the rise in total inflation will be temporary: total will converge with core (the experience since 1986)
If inflation expectations do rise, then wages andsalaries will be pressured to increase in time to keep
pace: other prices will be affected and core will converge with
total (the experience in the 1970s and early 1980s)
6
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
21/41
My Outlook
The Fed will ensure that inflation remainscontained over time
Supply shocks will bring slower growth near term;only modest effects on longer-term inflation
Unemployment is high (8.8%); shocks mean asomewhat slower return to full employment
Core inflation is low (a bit above 1% in prior year)
Thus the current accommodative stance of monetarypolicyis appropriate, and can continueto supportgrowth and both elements of the Fed mandate
7
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
22/41
8
Figure 1Spot Oil Price: West Texas Intermediate Crude Oil
Source: WSJ, NBER / Haver Analytics
January 2000 - April 2011
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Jan-2000 Jan-2002 Jan-2004 Jan-2006 Jan-2008 Jan-2010
Recession
Dollars per Barrel
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
23/41
9
Figure 2Oil Prices and Wages
Source: WSJ, BLS, NBER / Haver Analytics
2000:Q1 - 2011:Q1
0
0
0
1
1
1
-80
0
80
160
2000:Q1 2002:Q1 2004:Q1 2006:Q1 2008:Q1 2010:Q1
Percent Change from Year Earlier
Spot Oil Price
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
2
4
6
2000:Q1 2002:Q1 2004:Q1 2006:Q1 2008:Q1 2010:Q1
RecessionPercent Change from Year Earlier
Employment Cost Index: Civilian Workers' Total Compensation
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
24/41
10
Figure 3Wheat Prices Received by Farmers
Source: USDA, NBER / Haver Analytics
January 2000 - April 2011
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Jan-2000 Jan-2002 Jan-2004 Jan-2006 Jan-2008 Jan-2010
Recession
Dollars per Bushel
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
25/41
11
Figure 4Inflation Rate:
Core and All-Items Consumer Price Indexes
Source: BLS, NBER / Haver Analytics
January 1970 - March 2011
0
0
0
1
1
1
-4
0
4
8
12
16
Jan-1970 Jan-1975 Jan-1980 Jan-1985 Jan-1990 Jan-1995 Jan-2000 Jan-2005 Jan-2010
Recession
Percent Changefrom Year Earlier
CPI All Items
Core CPI
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
26/41
12
Figure 5Inflation Rate:
Core and Energy Consumer Price Indexes
Source: BLS, NBER / Haver Analytics
January 1970 - March 2011
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
-4
0
4
8
12
16
Jan-1970 Jan-1975 Jan-1980 Jan-1985 Jan-1990 Jan-1995 Jan-2000 Jan-2005 Jan-2010
Recession
Percent Change from Year Earlier Percent Change from Year Earlier
Energy CPI(Right Scale)
Core CPI
(Left Scale)
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
27/41
13
Figure 6Inflation Rate, 1970 - 1985:
Core and All-Items Consumer Price Indexes
Source: BLS, NBER / Haver Analytics
January 1970 - December 1985
0
0
0
1
1
1
-4
0
4
8
12
16
Jan-1970 Jan-1975 Jan-1980 Jan-1985
Recession
Percent Changefrom Year Earlier
CPIAll Items
Core CPI
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
28/41
14
Figure 7Inflation Rate, 1986 - 2011:
Core and All-Items Consumer Price Indexes
Source: BLS, NBER / Haver Analytics
January 1986 - March 2011
0
0
0
1
1
1
-4
0
4
8
12
16
Jan-1986 Jan-1991 Jan-1996 Jan-2001 Jan-2006 Jan-2011
Recession
Percent Changefrom Year Earlier
CPIAll Items
Core CPI
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
29/41
15
Figure 8Gap Between Total and Core Inflation vs
Change in Total Inflation
Source: BLS / Haver Analytics
1998:Q1 - 2011:Q1
-8
-4
0
4
8
12
-12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
Change in Total CPI Two Years Out (Percentage Point Difference)
Total CPI minus Core CPI (Percentage Point Difference)
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
30/41
16
Figure 9Gap Between Total and Core Inflation vs
Change in Core Inflation
Source: BLS / Haver Analytics
1998:Q1 - 2011:Q1
-8
-4
0
4
8
12
-12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
Change in Core CPI Two Years Out (Percentage Point Difference)
Total CPI minus Core CPI (Percentage Point Difference)
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
31/41
17
Figure 10Distribution of Private-Sector Employment betweenGoods-Producing and Service-Producing Industries
Source: BLS / Haver Analytics
1970 - 2010
0
20
40
60
80
100
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Goods-Producing Service-Producing
Percent
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
32/41
18
Figure 11US Per Capita Oil Consumption
Source: Energy Information Administration, Census Bureau / Haver Analytics
1970 - 2010
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010
Barrels Per Day Per Capita
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
33/41
19
Figure 12Share of World Oil Consumption
Note: Figures for 2010 are based on Energy Information Administration forecastsSource: Energy Information Administration
1980 - 2010
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
China, India and Brazil
Uni ted States
Percent
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
34/41
20
Figure 13Growth in World Oil Consumption
Note: Figures for 2010 are based on Energy Information Administration forecastsSource: Energy Information Administration
1980 - 2010
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
India
China
Brazil
World
Uni ted States
Index Level 1980=100
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
35/41
21
Figure 14Employment Cost Indexes for Civilian Workers
Source: BLS, NBER / Haver Analytics
1983:Q1 - 2011:Q1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1983:Q1 1986:Q1 1989:Q1 1992:Q1 1995:Q1 1998:Q1 2001:Q1 2004:Q1 2007:Q1 2010:Q1
Recession
Percent Change from Year Earlier
Total
Compensation
Wages &Salaries
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
36/41
22
Figure 15Long-Term Expected Inflation and Oil Prices
Source: Thomson Reuters / University of Michigan, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, WSJ, NBER / Haver Analytics
1990:Q1 - 2011:Q1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
-60
-30
0
30
60
90
120
150
1990:Q1 1993:Q1 1996:Q1 1999:Q1 2002:Q1 2005:Q1 2008:Q1 2011:Q1
Recession
University of Michigan: AverageAnnual Expected Price Changeover next 5-10 Years (Right Scale)
Survey of Professional Forecasters:Average Year-over-YearCPI InflationRate over next 10 Years (Right Scale)
Spot Oil Price (Left Scale)
Percent Change from Year Earlier Percent
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
37/41
23
Figure 16Inflation Components: Relative Importance
of Food Component of CPI by Country
Source: India - CSO, China - The Economist, Brazil - IBGE, EU - Eurostat, US - BLS
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
IndiaCPI-All India
ChinaCPI
BrazilIPCA
European UnionHICP
United StatesCPI-U
Percent
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
38/41
24
Figure 17Inflation Components:
Relative Importance of US CPI Components
Source: BLS / Haver Analytics
December 1990 - March 2011
0
20
40
60
80
100
Dec-1990 Dec-1995 Dec-2000 Dec-2005 Dec-2010 Mar-2011
Other
Apparel
TransportationExcluding Motor Fuel
Housing ExcludingHousehold Energy
Household Energy
Motor Fuel
Food
Percent
24.4 23.7
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
39/41
Concluding Observations
Recent supply shocks have pressured households;raised concern about long-term inflationary impacts
But evidence shows that over the last 25 years mostsupply shocks have been transitory, for inflation andexpectations
Still, recent trends dont always continue, so we mustmonitor inflation dynamics closely
To date, inflation expectations seem stable
Must respond as forcefully as necessary should thatchange
Currently, wages and salaries reflect the slack in labormarkets...
25
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
40/41
26
Figure 18Civilian Unemployment Rate andEmployment / Population Ratio
Source: BLS, NBER / Haver Analytics
January 2000 - March 2011
1
3
5
7
9
11
56
58
60
62
64
66
Jan-2000 Jan-2002 Jan-2004 Jan-2006 Jan-2008 Jan-2010
Recession
Percent Percent
Employment / Population Ratio* (Left Scale)
Unemployment Rate (Right Scale)
*Includes population 16 years and older
-
8/7/2019 Boston Fed Chief Eric Rosengren Speech, 5/4/11
41/41
Concluding Observations Continued
Central tendency of FOMC participantsexpects core inflation to remain low
Currently no reason to slow the economy
down with tighter monetary policy Until there is progress on both elements of
the Feds mandate (stable prices and
employment) the accommodative stance ofpolicy is appropriate
27