Dürr-Goldstein-Zanghiı - Bohmian Mechanics as the Foundation of Quantum Mechanics
BOHMIAN MECHANICS: a complementary computational tool to...
Transcript of BOHMIAN MECHANICS: a complementary computational tool to...
Guillem Albareda
Fritz Haber Institute [email protected]
BOHMIAN MECHANICS:
a complementary computational tool to describe molecular dynamics
Ringberg July 2012
D. Bohm L. De Broglie J.S. Bell
Ringberg July 2012 2
1. Motivation: A wave equation for a classical single particle
4. The use of Bohmian Mechanics in Molecular Dynamics
5. Conclusions and Future Work
Outline:
2. A short overview of Bohmian Mechanics: Analytic Bohmian Mechanics Synthetic Bohmian Mechanics
3. The Conditional wavefunction
3
1. Motivation: A wave equation for a classical single particle
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )
2 222 2
2
, /, ,, , ,
2 2 ,clcl cl
cl clcl
x t xx t x ti V x t x t x t
t m x m x tψψ ψα αα ψ ψψ
∂ ∂∂ ∂= − + +
∂ ∂
Classical wave equation for a single particle: [N. Rosen, Found. Phys. 16, 687 (1968)]
( ) ( ) ( ), , exp ( , ) /cl x t R x t iS x tψ α=
( ) ( )2
2, 1 ( , ) , 0x
R x t S x t R x tt m x
∂ ∂ +∇ = ∂ ∂
( ) ( )2, 1 ( , ) , 0
2S x t S x t V x t
t m x∂ ∂ + + = ∂ ∂
Local Conservation law:
Hamilton-Jacobi Equation:
( ) ( ),1,S x t
v x tm x∂
=∂
Since S(x,t) does not depend on R(x,t), v(x,t) is independent of the shape of clψ
Polar form of the wavefunction
Ringberg July 2012
Velocity field:
[ ] [ ] [ ]0
0 ' 'tj j j
tx t x t v t dt= + ∫( ) [ ]( )2
0 01
1, limM
jcl M j
x t x x tM
ψ δ→∞
=
= −∑Initial distribution of trajectories:
Can we do something similar with quantum mechanics?
“Extrinsic “ uncertainty
4
1. Motivation: A wave equation for classical single particle
2. A short overview of Bohmian Mechanics: Analytic Bohmian Mechanics Synthetic Bohmian Mechanics
Ringberg July 2012
4. The use of Bohmian Mechanics in Molecular Dynamics
5. Conclusions and Future Work
3. The Conditional wavefunction
Outline:
( ) ( ) ( )2
2, ,1 , 0R x t S x t
R x tt x m x
∂ ∂ ∂+ = ∂ ∂ ∂
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )22
2
, ,, ,
2Q Q
Q
x t x ti V x t x t
t m xψ ψ
ψ∂ ∂
= − +∂ ∂
( ) ( ) ( ), , exp ( , ) /x t R x t iS x tψ =
Quantum wave equation for a single particle: [D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 166 & 180 (1952)]
Local Continuity Equation:
Q. Hamilton-Jacobi Equation:
( ) ( ),1,S x t
v x tm x∂
=∂
Since S(x,t) does depend on R(x,t), v(x,t) dependent of the shape of Qψ
Polar form of the wavefunction
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( )
2 2 22, , , /1 , 02 2 ,
S x t S x t R x t xV x t
t m x m R x t∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
+ + − = ∂ ∂
( ),Q x t≡
Velocity field: “Analytic” Bohmian Mechanics “Synthetic”
Bohmian Mechanics
[ ] [ ] [ ]0
0 ' 'tj j j
tx t x t v t dt= + ∫
2. A short overview of Bohmian Mechanics: Single-particle Bohmian Mechanics
5 Ringberg July 2012
( ) [ ]( )20 0
1
1, limM
j
M jx t x x t
Mψ δ
→∞=
= −∑Initial distribution of trajectories
“Intrinsic “ uncertainty
Pilot-wave mechanics
( ) ( ) ( )2
2
1
, ,1 , 0N
k k k
R x t S x tR x t
t x m x=
∂ ∂ ∂+ = ∂ ∂ ∂ ∑
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )22
21
, ,, ,
2
NQ Q
Qk k
x t x ti V x t x t
t m xψ ψ
ψ=
∂ ∂= − +
∂ ∂∑
( ) ( ) ( ), , exp ( , ) /x t R x t iS x tψ =
Quantum wave equation for N many particles: [D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 166 & 180 (1952)]
Local Continuity Equation:
Hamilton-Jacobi Equation:
( ) ( ),1,kk
S x tv x t
m x∂
=∂
Polar form of the wavefunction:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( )
2 2 22
1 1
, , , /1 , 02 2 ,
N Nk
k kk
S x t S x t R x t xV x t
t m x m R x t= =
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ + + − = ∂ ∂ ∑ ∑
( )1
,N
kk
Q x t=
≡∑
Velocity field:
Since does depend on , each dependent of the shape of the whole wavefunction Qψ
( ),S x t ( ),R x t
( ),kv x t
[ ] [ ] [ ]0
0 ' 'tj j j
k k ktx t x t v t dt= + ∫
2. A short overview of Bohmian Mechanics: Many-particle Bohmian Mechanics
6 Ringberg July 2012
( ) [ ]( )20 0
1 1
1, limNM
jkM j k
x t x x tM
ψ δ→∞
= =
= −∑∏Initial distribution of trajectories
Evaluation of Observables
“…In any case, the basic reason for not paying attention to the Bohm approach is not some sort of ideological rigidity, but much simpler…It is just that we are all too busy with our own work to spend time on something that doesn’t seem likely to help us make progress with our real problems”. Steven Weinberg (private comunication with Shelly Goldstein)
Main criticism against Bohmian Mechanics formalism:
( ) ( ) ( ) *
ˆ ˆA A
ˆRe , , ,xx t A x i x t dx
ϕ ϕ
ϕ ϕ+∞
−∞
=
= − ∇ ∫
where ( ) ( ) ( )ˆ ˆA , , ' ', 'x t A x x x t dxϕ ϕ+∞
−∞= ∫
( )( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
*
*
ˆ, , ,A , Re
, ,x
B
x t A x i x tx t
x t x t
ϕ ϕ
ϕ ϕ
− ∇ =
“Local expectation value”: Expectation values:
( ) ( )
[ ]( )
2
1
A R , A ,
1lim A ,
B
Mj
BM j
x t x t dx
x t tM
+∞
−∞
→∞=
=
=
∫
∑
Examples for common observables:
( )Bx x x= ( ) ( ), , /Bp x t S x t x= ∂ ∂ ( ) ( ) ( )2
,1, ,2B
S x tK x t Q x t
m x∂
= + ∂ ( ) ( ), ,BJ x t v x t=
2. A short overview of Bohmian Mechanics: Evaluating Observables
7 Ringberg July 2012
8
1. Motivation: A wave equation for classical single particles
4. The use of Bohmian Mechanics in Molecular Dynamics
5. Conclusions and Future Work
2. A short overview of Bohmian Mechanics: “Analytic” Bohmian Mechanics “Synthetic” Bohmian Mechanics
3. The Conditional Wavefunction
Ringberg July 2012
Outline:
The Conditional wave equation:
( ) [ ]( )20 0
1 1
1, limNM
jkM j k
x t x x tM
ψ δ→∞
= =
= −∑∏ [ ] ( )[ ]
( )[ ]0 0
0 0
1 1
, ,1 1,...,j j
jo
N Nx x t x x t
S x t S x tv t
m x m x= =
∂ ∂ = ∂ ∂
Initial Trajectory’s Positions obey: Initial Trajectory’s Velocity obey:
( )0,x tψ [X. Oriols, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 066803 (2007)]
( ) ( ) ( )2
2
1
,, ,
2
N
kk
x ti V x t x t
t mψ
ψ=
∂ = − ∇ + ∂ ∑
[ ] ( )[ ]
( )[ ]0
1 1
, ,1 1,...,j j
j
N Nx x t x x t
S x t S x tv t
m x m x= =
∂ ∂ = ∂ ∂
[ ] [ ] [ ]
00 '
tj j j
tx t x t v t dt= + ∫
M grid points
configuration points NM
3. The Conditional wave function
9 Ringberg July 2012
The Conditional wave equation:
( ) [ ]( )20 0
1 1
1, limNM
jkM j k
x t x x tM
ψ δ→∞
= =
= −∑∏ [ ] ( )[ ]
( )[ ]0 0
0 0
1 1
, ,1 1,...,j j
jo
N Nx x t x x t
S x t S x tv t
m x m x= =
∂ ∂ = ∂ ∂
Initial Trajectory’s Positions obey: Initial Trajectory’s Velocity obey:
( )0,x tψ
( ) ( ) ( )2
2,, ,
2k k
k eff k k k
x ti V x t x t
t mϕ
ϕ∂
= − ∇ + ∂
[ ] ( )[ ]
( )[ ]1 01
1 1
1 1
, ,1 1,...,j j
N N
N Nj
N Nx x t x x t
S x t S x tv t
m x m x= =
∂ ∂ = ∂ ∂
[ ] [ ] [ ]
00 '
tj j j
tx t x t v t dt= + ∫
M grid points
configuration points M N⋅
[X. Oriols, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 066803 (2007)]
3. The Conditional wave function
10 Ringberg July 2012
M grid points
configuration points
Bad points :
2 2
2
( , ) ( , [ ], ) ( , [ ], ) · ( , [ ], ) ( , )2
a aa a b a b a b a a
a a
x ti V x x t t G x x t t i J x x t t x tt m x
ϕ ϕ ∂ ∂
= − + + + ∂ ∂
The interacting potential from (classical-like) Bohmian trajectories
Good points :
The terms G and J depend on the many-particle wave-function
This difficulty reminds the one it is found in the DFT (or TD-DFT)
An exact procedure for computing many-particle Bohmian trajectories where the correlations are introduced into time-dependent potentials:
There is a real potential to account for “non-classical” correlations
There is a imaginary potential to account for non-conserving norms
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) [ ]( )1
,, , , , , ,
N
a a b b b k k kk kk a
S x tG x x t V x t K x t Q x t v x t t
x=≠
∂ = + + − ∂
∑
( ) ( ) [ ]( ) ( ) ( )2 2
1
, , ,, , ,
N
a a b kk k k k kk a
R x t R x t S x tJ x x t v x t t
x x m x=≠
∂ ∂∂ = − ∂ ∂ ∂ ∑
3. The Conditional wave function
11 Ringberg July 2012
[X. Oriols, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 066803 (2007)]
12 Ringberg July 2012
3. The Conditional wave function
1 1
2 221 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 2
0 1 2 1 1 [ ]
( , ) ( , )( , ) ; [ ] [ ]2 * 4 [ ] | ( , ) |
o
t
ot r r t
r t q J r ti r t r t r t dtt m r r t r tπ ε ε
=
∂Ψ = − ∇ + Ψ = + ∂ − Ψ ∫
2 2
2 222 2 2 22 2 2 2 2 2
0 1 2 2 2 [ ]
( , ) ( , )( , ) ; [ ] [ ]2 * 4 [ ] | ( , ) |
o
t
ot r r t
r t q J r ti r t r t r t dtt m r t r r tπ ε ε
=
∂Ψ = − ∇ + Ψ = + ∂ − Ψ ∫
A simple case example: two Coulomb interacting electrons
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.40.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
(b)
ER FROZEN
ER FROZEN
SELF-CONSISTENT POTENTIALS
SELF-CONSISTENT POTENTIALS
Our approachVisual guided line
Fano
Fac
tor
Applied bias (Volts)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6(a)
Visual guided line# Particles collector# Particles emitter
Our approach
Cur
rent
(µA)
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.40.8
1.0
1.2
(b)
FROZEN POTENTIALS
FROZEN POTENTIALS
Our approachButtiker results [6]
Fano
Fac
tor
Applied bias (Volts)
0
1
2
3
4(a)
EFE
EFC
x=Lx=0L
ColectorEmitterER
Esaki results [16]# Particles collector# Particles emitterOur approach
Cur
rent
(µA)
3. The Conditional wave function
13 Ringberg July 2012
Application to nanoelectronic device simulation:
2 2
2
( , ) ( , [ ], ) ( , [ ], ) · ( , [ ], ) ( , )2
a aa a b a b a b a a
a a
x ti V x x t t G x x t t i J x x t t x tt m x
ϕ ϕ ∂ ∂
= − + + + ∂ ∂
G. Albareda et al., Phys. Rev. B 79, 075315 (2009).
G. Albareda et al., Phys. Rev. B 82, 085301 (2010).
BITLLES: Bohmian Interacting Transport in non-equiLibrium eLEctronic Structures
Bowling pins
F.L.Traversa et al., IEEE Trans. Elect. Dev. 58, 2104 (2011).
14
1. Motivation: A wave equation for classical single particles
4. The use of Bohmian Mechanics in Molecular Dynamics
5. Conclusions and Future Work
2. A short overview of Bohmian Mechanics: Analytic Bohmian Mechanics Synthetic Bohmian Mechanics
3. The Conditional wavefunction
Ringberg July 2012
Outline:
ˆ ˆ ˆmol el nuc el el el nuc nuc nucH K K V V V− − −= + + + +( ) ( )
, , ˆ , ,mol
x X ti H x X t
t
ψψ
∂=
∂
Conditional wavefunction of the electrons: ( ) [ ]( ) [ ]( ) [ ]( ) ( ), ˆ , , , , , , ,el
el el el el
x ti H x X t t G x X t t iJ x X t t x t
tϕ
ϕ∂
= + +∂
( ) ( ) ( )( )
( ) [ ]2
2 22
1
, , , , / , ,1, ,2 2 , ,
nucNn
el nn n n
S x X t R x X t X S x X tG x X t v t
M X M XR x X t=
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ = − − ∂ ∂ ∑
( ) ( )( ) [ ] ( ) ( )2 2
21
, , , , , ,, ,
2 , ,
nucN
el nn n n n
R x X t R x X t S x X tJ x X t v t
X X M XR x X t=
∂ ∂∂ = − ∂ ∂ ∂ ∑
Transmission of probability density between electrons and nuclei:
Non-classical correlations between electrons and nuclei:
MQCB & Ehrenfest dynamics for the electronic part:
( ) [ ]( ) ( ), ˆ , , ,elel el
x ti H x X t t x t
tϕ
ϕ∂
=∂
where
( ) [ ]( ) ( ), ˆ , , ,elel el
d x ti H x X t t x t
dtϕ
ϕ=
4. The use of Bohmian Mechanics in Molecular Dynamics
15 Ringberg July 2012
[E. J. Heller J. Chem. Phys. 62, 1544 (1975)] [E. Gindensperger J. Chem. Phys. 113, 1 (2000)]
Conditional wavefunction of the nuclei a:
( ) [ ] [ ]( ) [ ] [ ]( ) [ ] [ ]( ) ( ), ˆ , , , , , , , , , ,a aa a b a a b a a b a
X ti H x t X X t t G x t X X t t iJ x t X X t t x t
t∂Ω
= + + Ω∂
( ) ( ) ( )( )
( ) [ ]
( ) ( )( )
( ) [ ]
22 22
1
22 22
1
, , , , / , ,1, ,2 2 , ,
, , , , / , ,12 2 , ,
el
nuc
Nj
a jj j j
Nn
nn n nn a
S x X t R x X t x S x X tG x X t v t
m x m xR x X t
S x X t R x X t X S x X tv t
M X m XR x X t
=
=≠
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ = − − ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ + − − ∂ ∂
∑
∑
( ) ( )( ) [ ] ( ) ( )
( )( ) [ ] ( ) ( )
2
21
2
21
, , , , , ,, ,
2 , ,
, , , , , ,
2 , ,
el
nuc
N
a jj j j j
N
nn n n nn a
S x X t R x X t S x X tJ x X t v t
x x m xR x X t
S x X t R x X t S x X tv t
X X M XR x X t
=
=≠
∂ ∂∂ = − ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂∂ + − ∂ ∂ ∂
∑
∑
Transmission of probability density from the nuclei a to all the other particles:
Non-classical correlations between the nuclei a and all the other particles:
ˆ ˆa a el el el a nuc aH K V V V− − −= + + +where
16 Ringberg July 2012
4. The use of Bohmian Mechanics in Molecular Dynamics
( ) [ ] [ ]( ) [ ] [ ]( ) [ ] [ ]( ) ( ), ˆ , , , , , , , , , ,a aa a b a a b a a b a
X ti H x t X X t t G x t X X t t iJ x t X X t t x t
t∂Ω
= + + Ω∂
Conditional wavefunction of the nuclei a:
( ) ( ) ( )( ), , exp , /a a a a a aX t r X t is X tΩ = a×∇
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) , , , , ,a a a el a a nuc a a a a nuc aM r X t V X t V X t Q X t G X t− −⋅ = −∇ + + +
Ehrenfest dynamics for the nuclei:
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ), , , , ,a a a el el a a el nuc a aM r X t x t V X t x t V X tϕ ϕ− − ⋅ = −∇ +
MQCB dynamics for the nuclei:
( ) ( ) ( ), , ,a a a el a a nuc a aM r X t V X t V X t− −⋅ = −∇ +
4. The use of Bohmian Mechanics in Molecular Dynamics
17 Ringberg July 2012
[E. J. Heller J. Chem. Phys. 62, 1544 (1975)]
[E. Gindensperger J. Chem. Phys. 113, 1 (2000)]
18
1. Motivation: A wave equation for classical single particles
4. The use of Bohmian Mechanics in Molecular Dynamics
5. Conclusions and Future Work
2. A short overview of Bohmian Mechanics: Analytic Bohmian Mechanics Synthetic Bohmian Mechanics
3. The Conditional wavefunction
Ringberg July 2012
Outline:
Coherence in the SSH model Hamiltonian:
In particular, Bohmian Mechanics together with the concept of Conditional wavefunction allows a rigorous derivation of the MQCB and Ehrenfest approaches to molecular dynamics.
The exact splitting of electronic and nuclear degrees of freedom in terms of the Conditional wavefunction leads to a rigorous starting point for making approximations, specially for mixed quantum-classical approaches.
SSH el el ph phH H H H−= + +
( )1
† †0 1, , , 1,
1 1
N
el n s n s n s n sn s
H t c c c c−
+ += =±
= − × +∑∑
( ) ( )1
† †1 1, , , 1,
1 1
N
el ph n n n s n s n s n sn s
H u u c c c cα−
− + + += =±
= − × +∑∑
( )2 1
21
1 12 2
N Nn
ph n nn n
p kH u uM
−
+= =
= + −∑ ∑
4. Conclusions and Future work
19 Ringberg July 2012
Ringberg July 2012
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
Heiko Appel Angel Rubio
Ignacio Franco Xavier Oriols
Tanja Dimitrov Johannes Flick René Jestädt
Jessica Walkenhorst Kurt Baarman Wael Chibani
Alexander Kegeles
THANK YOU!