Board of Trustees’ Annual Planning Retreat February 7, 2011 2011 RSCCD “Plan to Plan”

Board of Trustees’ Annual Planning Retreat

February 7, 2011

2011 RSCCD “Plan to Plan”

Agenda

Review of 2010-2011 vision & goals Accountability Reporting for the Community

Colleges (ARCC) 12 Measures of Success Progress towards Goals Results of Community/Staff Input, 2010-

2011 Goals Recommendations of 2011-2012 Goals

RSCCD is a learning community. The college district and its colleges are committed to ensuring access and equity, and to planning comprehensive educational opportunities throughout our communities. We will be global leaders in many fields, delivering cost-effective, innovative programs and services that are responsive to the diverse needs and interests of all students. We will be exceptionally sensitive and responsive to the economic and educational needs of our students and communities. The environment will be collegial and supportive for students, staff, and the communities we serve.

We will promote and extensively participate in partnerships with other educational providers, business, industry, and community groups. We will enhance our communities' cultural, educational, and economic well-being.

We will be a leader in the state in student learning outcomes. Students who complete programs will be prepared for success in business, industry, careers, and all future educational endeavors. We will prepare students to embrace and engage the diversity of our global community and to assume leadership roles in their work and public lives.

Vision

2010-2011 Goals

#1 -- Promote a learning community environment that is innovative, student-centered, and celebrates student achievement.

#2 -- Provide access and retention for completion programs, including transfer, vocational, and high school diploma programs; and prepare students for success in their academic, career, and personal life endeavors.

#3 – Update and implement facilities master plans, maximize college and community use of facilities, and incorporate “green” efforts into facilities development and other efforts when cost-effective.

2010-2011 Goals, Cont.

#4 -- Promote flexible, cost-effective educational programs and services including the use of cutting-edge technology and educational program delivery via technology.

#5 -- Pursue alternative public and private funding sources to increase the district’s fiscal sustainability and to implement the district’s vision and goals, and encourage the foundations and district to create plans for capital and program campaigns and alumni association development.

#6 -- Maintain a positive, productive working environment for employees, recognizing and embracing diversity and enhancing staff development opportunities that address innovation and technology.

2010-2011 Goals, Cont.

#7 -- Expand partnerships with business, labor, community groups, universities, schools, and other public and private agencies in order to enhance the district’s resource development; ensure student access and success; ensure robust economic development programs; and be responsive to workforce development needs and high demand career fields.

#8 -- Assess the educational needs of the communities we serve, and enhance awareness of the colleges and community involvement through outreach and advocacy among community constituencies and leaders.

ARCC

Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC)/AB1417 is the framework that provides for the annual evaluation of community college performance in meeting statewide educational outcome priorities.

Required the System Office to develop an accountability report/model

Replaced Partnership for Excellence to keep funding in the community college system

Legislatively-required annual report—Local trustee review is required

ARCC

Colleges are NOT ranked!

SAC and SCC should NOT be compared to each other

College performance is analyzed over a three-year period AND within selected peer groups

Many college activities could impact these measures

This is one measure of success, not the only one….staff encourages multiple measures of assessment for continuous improvement

ARCC: College Report

Progress and Achievement: Degree/Certificate/Transfer Progress and Achievement Rate Percentage of students earning 30 or more units 1st Fall to 2nd Fall Persistence Rate

Progress and Achievement: Workforce Development Annual successful course completion rate for vocational

courses Pre-Collegiate Improvement

Annual successful course completion rate for basic skills courses

ESL Improvement Rate Basic Skills Improvement Rate Career Development and College Preparation (CDCP) Progress

and Achievement Rate (Non-Credit) College Profile Peer Grouping College Self-Assessment

ARCC: Progress and Achievement (Degree/Certificate/Transfer)

2001-02 to 2006-

07

2002-03 to 2007-

08

2003-04 to 2008-09

Peer Group

Average

Student Progress & Achievement SAC SCC

44.8%45.0%

45.3%42.8%

43.3%39.0%

42.5%47.9%

Percentage of Students Who Earned at Least 30 units SAC SCC

70.1%56.7%

72.3%56.2%

69.1%52.2%

75.0%68.3%

Fall to Fall Student Persistence SAC SCC

Fall 05-Fall 06

71.7%68.8%

Fall 06-Fall 07

76.6%72.4%

Fall 08-Fall 09

74.3%62.9%

72.6%66.5%

ARCC: Progress and Achievement

(Workforce Development)

2006-2007

2007-2008 2008-2009

Peer Group

Average

Annual Successful Course Completion Rate for Vocational Courses SAC SCC

88.5%87.2%

89.6%90.5%

89.7%91.3%

90.5%90.5%

ARCC: Progress and Achievement

(Basic Skills, ESL/Credit Improvement)

2004-05 to 2006-

07

2005-06 to 2007-

08

2006-07 to 2008-

09

Peer Group

Average

Annual Successful Course Completion Rate for Credit Basic Skills Courses SAC SCC

62.0%58.4%

60.5%61.8%

61.9%63.8%

65.7%63.8%

ESL Improvement Rate SAC SCC

52.1%80.0%

58.9%76.7%

55.6%75.0%

48.8%55.0%

Credit Basic Skills Improvement Rate

SAC SCC

50.3%59.6%

49.9%59.1%

55.6%65.0%

50.7%54.8%

How Do We Evaluate Ourselves?

12 Measures of Success

Access Successful course completion Course retention College-level skills attainment Graduation Transfers to four-year universities Student satisfaction Matriculation of continuing education students to credit Vocational technical education core indicators of

performance Employee diversity Financial indicators Resource development

Measure 1: Access to Students

Feeder High School Graduates Enrolled as New Freshmen

% of New HS Graduates Enrolled at RSCCD

31%

23%

36%

36%

30%

33%

33%

36%

18%

16%

15%

22%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 2009 Fall 2010

Santa Ana Orange Garden Grove

Measure 1: Access to Students

Enrollment and Service Area Population

74%85%

75% 77%

92%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Service Area2010

K-12 Enrollment2009-10

All CreditEnrollment Fall

2010

TraditionalCredit

Enrollment Fall2010

Non-CreditEnrollment Fall

2010

% Non-White

Measure 2: Successful Course Completion

69%

72%69% 69%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%


63%

67%65%

64%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%


Santiago Canyon College Santa Ana College

Measure 3: Course Retention

85%83%84%

82%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%


83%81%82%82%

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%


Santiago Canyon College Santa Ana College

Measure 4: College-Level Skill Attainment

Successful Completion of English 061/ESL 112 or Higher

1% 3%

19%

49%

13%

30%

15%

35%

45%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

ESL N40A ESL N40B ESL N49 ESL 055 ESL 107 ESL 109 ESL 110 ENG N50 ENG N60

Initial English Course Advisement

% Suc

cess

ful a

t Col

lege

-Lev

el W

ithin

4 Y

ears

26%

55%

25%

41%33%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

ACE 42/43 ACE 052/053 ACE 093/102 ENG N50 ENG N60

Initial English Course Advisement

% S

ucce

ssfu

l at C

olle

ge-L

evel

W

ithin

4 Y

ears

Santiago Canyon College

Santa Ana College

7%9%

23%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

MATH N05* MATH N06 MATH N48

Initial Math Course Advisement

% S

ucce

ssfu

l at C

olle

ge-L

evel

With

in 4

Ye

ars

Measure 4: College-Level Skill Attainment

Successful Completion of Math 060 or Higher

13%17%

36%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

MATH N05* MATH N06 MATH N48

Initial Math Course Advisement

% Suc

cess

ful a

t Col

lege

-Lev

el

With

in 4

Yea

rs

Santa Ana College


Measure 5: GraduatesAA/AS Degrees & Certificates Awarded

1295 1377 1294 1322

905

528 524

1094

0

500

1000

1500

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Graduating Year

Num

ber o

f Gra

duat

es

AA/AS Certificates

683636 595 603

230 226344

815

0

200

400

600

800

1000

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Graduating Year

Num

ber o

f Gra

duat

es

AA/AS Certificates


Santa Ana College

Measure 5: GraduatesHigh School Diplomas Awarded

146185 189

150

0

50

100

150

200

250

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10Graduating Year

# o

f dip

lom

as

120 124 12285

0

50

100

150

200

250

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10Graduating Year

# o

f dip

lom

as

SAC School of Continuing Education

SCC School of Continuing Education

Measure 6: Transfers to 4-Year Institutions

726749 801939 985

156218

204 234 198

382450 575

357

578

0200400600800

100012001400

05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10

372

468

356338

332

147 152103 105 94

284 270

202 223239

0

100

200

300

400

500

05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10


Santa Ana College

Measure 7: Student Satisfaction

“The effectiveness of classroom experience is good/excellent”

SAC current students 82%graduates 87%

SCC current students 78%graduates 87%

“The campus environment is good/excellent” SAC current students 80%

graduates 88%

SCC current students 74%graduates 83%


Examples of SAC Core Competencies

“Write in an organized & grammatically correct fashion.”

Current Students 78%

Graduates 83%

“Respect & work with people of different cultural backgrounds”


Graduates 94%

“Interact with integrity and awareness of others’ opinions/values.”


Graduates 88%


Examples of SCC Student Learning Outcomes

“Take responsibility for one’s own learning and well-being.”


Graduates 86%

“Communicate ideas in a clear and articulate manner.”


Graduates 90%

“Critically analyze, evaluate, organize and use quantitative and qualitative data.”


Graduates 87%

Measure 8: Matriculation of Continuing Education Students

to Credit Program

938 970 983 791

0

200

400

600

800


CE to SAC Credit

152 162 166 172

0

50

100

150

200


CE to SCC Credit

Measure 9: Vocational Technical Education

Core Indicators of Performance (2007-08 cohort)

Students in apprenticeship & vocational courses:

SAC SCC CASuccessful course completion 91% 97% 88%

Earn AA degree, certificate, or credential 85% 34% 82%

Persistence and transfer 87% 77% 86%

Employment, internship, or military enlistment 88% 93% 82%

Participation in training for non-traditional 15% 4% 20%employment Completion of training for non-traditional 18% 17% 22%employment

Measure 10: Employee Diversity

% of Non-White Districtwide

43%

60%

33%

50%

64%

38%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

F/T Faculty F/T Classified F/T Management

Fall 2005 Fall 2010

Measure 11: Financial Indicators

Ending Balance (% of Expenditures)

12.93%

5.24%5.70%

13.45%

12.22%

13.18%

12.18%11.12%

14.31%

8.44%9.62%

20.39%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

Measure 12: Resource Development

Competitive Grant Income

$24,077,547

$30,238,778$30,128,395 $30,396,270

$25,614,423

$20,000,000

$25,000,000

$30,000,000

$35,000,000

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10Fiscal Year

District-wide Grants

Measure 12: Resource Development

Financial Aid Awarded to Students

$8,703,308

$8,847,829

$9,582,271$12,248,746

$16,058,040

$0

$5,000,000

$10,000,000

$15,000,000

$20,000,000

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10Fiscal Year

Awarded by SAC and SCC

Progress Toward 2010-2011 Goals

#1 -- Promote a learning community environment that is innovative, student-centered, and celebrates student achievement.

#2 -- Provide access and retention for completion programs, including transfer, vocational, and high school diploma programs; and prepare students for success in their academic, career, and personal life endeavors.

#3 – Update and implement facilities master plans, maximize college and community use of facilities, and incorporate “green” efforts into facilities development and other efforts when cost-effective.


#4 -- Promote flexible, cost-effective educational programs and services including the use of cutting-edge technology and educational program delivery via technology.

#5 -- Pursue alternative public and private funding sources to increase the district’s fiscal sustainability and to implement the district’s vision and goals, and encourage the foundations and district to create plans for capital and program campaigns and alumni association development.

#6 -- Maintain a positive, productive working environment for employees, recognizing and embracing diversity and enhancing staff development opportunities that address innovation and technology.


#7 -- Expand partnerships with business, labor, community groups, universities, schools, and other public and private agencies in order to enhance the district’s resource development; ensure student access and success; ensure robust economic development programs; and be responsive to workforce development needs and high demand career fields.

#8 -- Assess the educational needs of the communities we serve, and enhance awareness of the colleges and community involvement through outreach and advocacy among community constituencies and leaders.

Community/Staff Input 2010-2011 Goals

Online survey implemented early January 2011

Members of community include District Citizens’ Advisory Committee, District Bond Oversight Committee, Chambers of Commerce, trade unions, community organizations, college and district foundations, elected officials, city and school districts, RSCCD employees, and student leaders were invited to participate

283 respondents


Goal #1 (promote innovative & student-centered learning environment) and Goal #2 (provide access for completion programs…) received highest level of satisfaction

Goal #3 (update of master plans, maximize facilities use, and incorporate green efforts), Goal #4 (promote flexible cost-effective educational programs and services) and Goal #6 (maintain positive and productive work environment received least satisfaction

Goal #7 (expand partnerships in the community with business, labor, K-14 and Goal #8 (enhance awareness of the colleges through outreach and advocacy) earned the highest mid-scale ratings (20%).


Goal #1 (promoting learning community environment…) Goal #2 (provide access & retention for completion

programs…) Goal #4 (promote flexible, cost-effective educational

programs…) Goal #6 (maintain positive, productive working environment…) Goal #5 (pursue alternative funding…) Goal #3 (update/implement facilities master plans…) Goal #8 (assess educational needs of communities…) Goal #7 (expand partnerships with business, community

groups…)

ranking of importance of goals

Community/Staff Input of 2010-2011 Goals

Most frequently expressed comments

Reinstate COLA, step and longevity increases for staff

Build damaged morale of staff (due to reductions in force, etc.)

Remove politics from the classroom and move to a more student-centered climate

Increase emphasis on vocational classes Actively pursue green technology

Recommendations of 2011-2012 Goals

BOT vision/goals serve as guiding principles for district/colleges staff

Staff recommends that BOT maintains current goals for 2011-2012

Board of Trustees’ Annual Planning Retreat February 7, 2011 2011 RSCCD “Plan to Plan”

Documents

Transcript of Board of Trustees’ Annual Planning Retreat February 7, 2011 2011 RSCCD “Plan to Plan”