Björn Ållebrand and Hans-Peter Nee Electrical Machines and Power Electronics

14
Comparison of commutation transients of inverters with silicon carbide JFETs with and without body diodes Björn Ållebrand and Hans- Peter Nee Electrical Machines and Power Electronics Department of Electrical Engineering

description

Comparison of commutation transients of inverters with silicon carbide JFETs with and without body diodes. Björn Ållebrand and Hans-Peter Nee Electrical Machines and Power Electronics Department of Electrical Engineering KTH. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Björn Ållebrand and Hans-Peter Nee Electrical Machines and Power Electronics

Page 1: Björn Ållebrand and Hans-Peter Nee Electrical Machines and Power Electronics

Comparison of commutation transients of inverters with silicon carbide JFETs with and without

body diodes

Björn Ållebrand and Hans-Peter NeeElectrical Machines and Power Electronics

Department of Electrical EngineeringKTH

Page 2: Björn Ållebrand and Hans-Peter Nee Electrical Machines and Power Electronics

Background I

• SiC has approximately ten times higher critical electric field compared to Si.

• This makes SiC attractive for majority carrier (uni-polar) devices.

• For bi-polar devices the large band gap will lead to high losses.

• This means that a SiC IGBT will only be interesting for the highest voltage levels.

Page 3: Björn Ållebrand and Hans-Peter Nee Electrical Machines and Power Electronics

Background II

• There is problems with manufacturing SiC MOSFETs.

• Therefore the interest has shifted to SiC JFETs.

• There are different ways of designing SiC JFETs.

• Buried gate JFETs and Vertical JFETs.

Page 4: Björn Ållebrand and Hans-Peter Nee Electrical Machines and Power Electronics

Different SiC JFET designs

Bg-JFET VJFET

Page 5: Björn Ållebrand and Hans-Peter Nee Electrical Machines and Power Electronics

Inverter topology

Page 6: Björn Ållebrand and Hans-Peter Nee Electrical Machines and Power Electronics

Commutation Procedure I

Page 7: Björn Ållebrand and Hans-Peter Nee Electrical Machines and Power Electronics

Commutation Procedure II

Page 8: Björn Ållebrand and Hans-Peter Nee Electrical Machines and Power Electronics

Simulations

• Simulations show that it is not much difference between inverters using the different SiC JFETs.

• The switching losses will be slightly larger for inverters with SiC JFETs without body diodes.

Page 9: Björn Ållebrand and Hans-Peter Nee Electrical Machines and Power Electronics

Short-circuit current

Large gate-drain capacitances

Page 10: Björn Ållebrand and Hans-Peter Nee Electrical Machines and Power Electronics

Reducing short-circuit currents

• Reducing the gate-drain capacitance (redesign of the component).

• Increasing the gate voltage to a higher value (may lead to that the component must be redesigned).

Page 11: Björn Ållebrand and Hans-Peter Nee Electrical Machines and Power Electronics

New Simulations

• In simulations with the gate-drain capacitance lowered by a factor of two, the switching losses were reduced.

Page 12: Björn Ållebrand and Hans-Peter Nee Electrical Machines and Power Electronics

Conclusions I• Using an inverter with only SiC JFETs is possible. • Using different SiC JFETs will not affect

performance that much.• A drawback is that short-circuit currents will

occur and this increases the switching losses.• The short-circuit currents can be reduced by

different means.

Page 13: Björn Ållebrand and Hans-Peter Nee Electrical Machines and Power Electronics

Conclusions II

• The gate-drain capacitance has to be reduced.

• Or a higher gate voltage needs to be used.

Page 14: Björn Ållebrand and Hans-Peter Nee Electrical Machines and Power Electronics

Future Work

• Investigate how the short-circuit current will be for larger devices.

• How will the stray inductance affect this short-circuit current.