livin Bishop Middleham

Community Plan 2011-14

with the community at heart Revised March 2013

2

Equality and Diversity livin aims to ensure that Equality and Diversity lies at the heart of our business and allows our customers to access high quality services tailored to their individual diverse needs. It is our policy to provide access to services and employment equality to all, irrespective of age, race or ethnic origin, gender, marital or family status, religious or philosophical belief or political opinion, disability, nationality or sexual orientation. As part of our commitment we, and our working partners, aim to treat everyone as equal citizens and recognise, support and value the diversity of the communities in which they live.

Contact Us

Communities Team

livin, Farrell House, Arlington Way

DurhamGate, Spennymoor, Co Durham, DL16 6NL

0800 587 4538 (free from a landline) or 0300 111 2234 (low rate

call from a mobile phone depending on your network)

3

Based on the intelligence contained within each Plan livin has been able to rank the

local community based on; Bronze (potential), Silver (aspiring) or Gold (performing).

This will enable us to see which communities require more immediate and intensive

interventions whilst ensuring there are mechanisms in place to maintain Gold

standards.

Indicator Ranking

Housing Market Affordability SILVER

Tenancy Turnover GOLD

Demand for livin housing SILVER

Average cost of repairs to livin properties SILVER

Long Term Unemployment1

(6 - 12 months) BRONZE

Average Household Income2 BRONZE

Rental Debit GOLD

Educational Attainment (5 GCSE’s Grade C & Above)

GOLD

Environmental Assessment GOLD

Overall Community Ranking GOLD

1,2 Data used to compile this ranking relates to the Ward of Bishop Middleham and Cornforth.

Data collection limitations have restricted this information being available for Bishop

Middleham only.

Community Ranking - Bishop Middleham

4

Page No.

Section 1 Community profile 7

1.1 Demographics 8

1.1.1 Population – now and in the future 8

1.1.2 Religion and ethnicity 12

1.2 Housing 14

1.2.1 Housing tenure 14

1.2.2 Average house prices 16

1.2.3 Current supply and demand for housing 18

1.2.4 livin tenancy sustainment 22

1.2.5 Vacant/Abandoned properties 23

1.2.6 Future demand for housing 25

1.2.7 Average cost of repairs to livin properties 27

1.2.8 Average cost of improvement programmes for 27

livin properties

1.3 Crime and Antisocial Behaviour 28

1.4 Economy and Employment 31

1.4.1 Economic activity 31

1.4.2 Jobseeker’s Allowance claimants 35

1.4.3 Department for Works and Pensions Key 36

Benefit Claimants

1.4.4 Household Income 37

1.4.5 Vehicle Ownership and Cost of Travel 37

1.4.6 Rental debit in livin properties 38

1.5 Access to Services and Facilities 40

1.6 Health and Wellbeing 42

Contents

5

Page No.

1.7 Education and Training 44

1.8 Reputation of the local area and community cohesion 46

1.9 Local Environment 47

Section 2 Community priorities 49

Section 3 Review of the community plan 50

Appendix 1 livin Strategic framework and regulatory 51

requirements

Appendix 2 Methodology 57

6

Page No.

Figure 1.1 Aerial overview of Bishop Middleham 7

Figure 1.2 Age profile of population in Bishop Middleham 8

Figure 1.3 Household profile for Bishop Middleham 9

Figure 1.4 Population projections for Durham County 10

Figure 1.5 Age pyramid projections for Durham County 11

Figure 1.6 Housing tenure in Bishop Middleham 15

Figure 1.7 Average house prices in Bishop Middleham 16

Figure 1.8 livin stock in Bishop Middleham 18

Figure 1.9 Age profile of livin lead tenants in Bishop Middleham 19

Figure 1.10 livin properties available for let during the period 20

1 October 2009 to 30 September 2010 in

Bishop Middleham

Figure 1.11 livin tenancy sustainment within Bishop Middleham 22

Figure 1.12 Bishop Middleham and Cornforth Police Beat Area 28

Figure 1.13 Economic activity in Bishop Middleham 31

Figure 1.14 Occupation profile of 16 to 74 year olds in 33

Bishop Middleham

Figure 1.15 Economic inactivity in Bishop Middleham 34

Figure 1.16 Jobseeker’s Allowance claimants in Bishop Middleham 35

Figure 1.17 Breakdown of persons claiming key benefits within 36

Bishop Middleham

Figure 1.18 Levels of Health within Bishop Middleham 42

Figure 1.19 Educational attainment within Bishop Middleham 44

Figure 1.20 Route of Environmental Assessment 48

List of Figures

7

Bishop Middleham is a rural village located within County Durham, 10 miles south of

Durham City and 14 miles north of Darlington. It is located within the Parish of

Bishop Middleham and Mainsforth.

In 1072 William the Conqueror built the castle

at Durham, and castles at Stockton and

Darlington. Being situated in an almost

central position to all three the area became

a favourite seat for the early Bishops, and

with this being their middle home, the name

Bishop Middleham was derived. By the late

fourteenth century the buildings and land were no longer used by the Bishop and

were let out for use by his bailiff. By the nineteenth century the village contained four

public houses, a brewery, and a few tradesman’s’ shops.

The centre of the Bishop Middleham includes a thirteenth century Church that looks

out over the village.

Figure 1.1: Aerial overview of Bishop Middleham

Source: Ordnance Survey

Once part of the former “Sedgefield Borough”, Bishop Middleham is now served by

the unitary authority of Durham County Council (DCC).

Over the years the village has

mainly supported itself by farming

with coalmining present in the

surrounding areas.

Section 1 Community Profile

8

In conjunction with Mainsforth, Bishop Middleham has its own Parish Council and is

also part of the 4 Together Partnership; the local Area Action Partnership (AAP)

covering Ferryhill, Chilton, West Cornforth and Bishop Middleham.

1.1 Demographics

1.1.1 Population – Now and in the Future

The population of Bishop Middleham is approximately 1,335.

48% of the total population are male with the remaining 52%

being female (Census, 2001, LLSOA, KS01, 007A).

Population data indicates that Bishop Middleham has a

diverse range of age groups. There is a high percentage (67%) of persons aged

between 16 to 64 years old living in the village; this being significantly higher than

the Durham County and North East average of 64%. To facilitate good levels of

economic activity within the area it is essential that a high percentage of the

population are of working age and contributing to the local economy through

employment or actively seeking work.

Although the population of children aged 0 to 15 years remains in line with the

Durham County and North East average, there is a significantly lower percentage of

persons aged 65 years or more living within the village.

Figure 1.2: Age profile of population in Bishop Middleham Source: Census 2001, Lower Layer Super Output Area (LLSOA), KS02, 007A

The population of

Bishop Middleham is

approximately 1,335.

19

67

14

19

64

17

19 64 17 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

People aged: 0-15 People aged: 16-64 People aged: 65+

%

Bishop Middleham

Durham County

North East

9

The main household types in Bishop Middleham consist of married couples with no

dependent children (25%), followed by married couples with dependent children

(24%) and single persons (22%) (Census 2001, LLSOA, KS20, 007A).

The number of married households with dependent children in Bishop Middleham is

higher than the averages for both Durham County (18%) and North East (17%).

There are also a higher percentage of married couples without children living in the

village when compared to the Durham County (22%) and North East average (20%).

There is a lower percentage of lone parent households (with dependents) when

compared to Durham County (7%) and North East (7%) averages and a significantly

lower percentage of single person households.

Figure 1.3: Household Profile for Bishop Middleham Source: Census 2001, LLSOA, KS20, 007A

This higher percentage of families and married couples living in the village can be

attributed to the age profile within the village which indicates that 67% of persons are

aged 16 to 64 years old. The low percentage of single households within the village

may be due to the lower than average percentage of persons aged 65 years or more

living in the village.

Trend-based projections from DCC indicate that the countywide population will

initially decline up until 2016 before staging a recovery and increasing to an

24%

25%

4% 5%

4% 3%

22%

0% 12%

1% Married couple household withdependent child(ren)

Married couple household with nodependent child(ren)

Cohabiting couple household withdependent child(ren)

Cohabiting couple household with nodependent child(ren)

Lone parent household with dependentchild(ren)

Lone parent household with nodependent child(ren)

One person household

Multi person household: All student

Multi person household: All other

Multi person household: With dependentchild(ren)

10

estimated total of 501,625 in 2026 (Strategic Housing Market Assessment, DCC,

2010).

Figure 1.4: Population projections for Durham County Source: Durham County Strategic Housing Market Assessment, 2010

In the decades following the end of the war there was a significant rise in the birth

rate following the political and economic uncertainties of the late 1930’s and the

wartime period. Progression of this ‘baby boom’ generation has caused, and will

continue to cause, different challenges to the County’s population.

Currently this generation falls entirely within the economically active age group, but

shortly will begin the transition into retirement and will be the main driver of an

ageing population over the next 28 years. Increasing life expectancy will also

contribute towards the County’s growing elderly

population. DCC’s age pyramid (figure 1.5)

highlights the increase in the age 65 plus age group

and the decline in the economically active age

group.

To facilitate good levels of economic activity within a

community it is essential that a high percentage of

the population are working and contributing to the local economy through

employment or by actively seeking work.

2008-based projections: various trends for the overall population

465000

470000

475000

480000

485000

490000

495000

500000

505000

510000

515000

520000

525000

530000

535000

540000

545000

550000

555000

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

2013

2015

2017

2019

2021

2023

2025

Nu

mb

er

anticipatedactual

DCC

Principal

DCC Lower

95%

DCC NC

ONS

Principal

By 2026 the number of

persons in the

“economically active” age

group will total less than

present.

11

To encourage and attract an economically active population to reside in an area it is

imperative for there to be a good supply of local sustainable jobs and affordable

housing.

Figure 1.5: Age pyramid projections for Durham County

Source: Durham County Council, Strategic Housing Market Assessment, 2010

The age pyramid indicates that in 2008

persons aged between 25 to 35 years were in

the minority when compared to other age

groups within the County. This means that by

2026 when the whole of this age group is

expected to be economically active there will

be a lesser number of persons contributing

towards economic activity than at present.

The projection of an increasing elderly population, coupled with an associated fall in

the numbers of persons that are economically active will see an increased demand

on fiscal, housing and health provisions throughout the County during the coming

years.

Although Bishop Middleham does not currently have an ageing population there is a

probability of this emerging over the next 20 to 30 years. There are currently more

persons aged between 16 to 64 plus years living in the village; many of whom will in

20 to 30 years’ time have begun their transition into retirement. If efforts are not

made to continually encourage and attract younger households to the village through

2008 based projections: the Age Pyramids for County Durham in 2008 and 2026 implied by

the DCC and ONS projections

40000 30000 20000 10000 0 10000 20000 30000 40000

0-4

5-9

10-14

15-19

20-24

25-29

30-34

35-39

40-44

45-49

50-54

55-59

60-64

65-69

70-74

75-79

80-84

85-90

90+

ag

e g

rou

ps

year 2008 year 2026

ONS 2026

ONS 2008

2026 DCC

2008 DCC

2 per. Mov. Avg.(2008 DCC)2 per. Mov. Avg.(ONS 2008)2 per. Mov. Avg.(2026 DCC)2 per. Mov. Avg.(ONS 2026)

An ageing population, and fall in

the number of persons

economically active by 2026 will

place an increased demand on

fiscal, housing and health

provisions.

12

the provision of affordable and accessible housing and sustainable employment then

it is likely that an ageing population will become prominent. An ageing population

within a community can have a detrimental effect on sustainability and the local

economy.

DCC estimates indicate that in 2010 there were 206,281 households countywide.

This number is expected to increase by 24.9% to a total of 257,651 households by

2030 (Strategic Housing Market Assessment, DCC, 2010).

By 2030 single person households (including single pensioners) are expected to

double (100.3% increase to 56,564); whereas two person households are only

expected to increase by 18% to 14,087. Larger households of three persons or

more, those with a housing need of two bedroom properties or more, are expected to

reduce by 19,281 (26.9%). This decrease in larger households, coupled with a

significant increase in single person households, will have a major impact on the

supply and demand of housing throughout the County.

1.1.2 Religion and Ethnicity

An understanding of the ethnic and religious structure of the local population enables

livin to ensure that services are equally accessible, responsive and tailored to the

needs and requirements of all residents living within these local communities. It will

also help livin ensure that any minority groups are consulted with during future

research and intelligence gathering, and allows for consideration of any specific

needs in relation to access for housing, health, and employability during the creation

of each community’s key priorities and Local Offers.

2001 Census data indicated that the main religion in Bishop Middleham is

Christianity (87%). 0.2% stated their religion to be “other”. The remaining population

stated they had no religion or did not provide details (Census, 2001, LLSOA, KS07,

007A).

Ethnicity within the area predominantly consists of White British (99%). The

remaining 1% of the population is from other ethnic backgrounds including Irish,

Other white, or Mixed white and Asian (Census, 2001, LLSOA, KS06, 007A).

Recent research conducted by DCC and NHS Darlington estimated that between

0.43% and 0.57% of Durham County’s population consists of persons from Gypsy,

Roma and Traveller Households (Renaissance Research, 2010). Further analysis of

these figures is currently not possible due to a lack of further data and intelligence.

DCC’s Gypsy, Roma and Traveller site at East Howle is the only permanent

residential site within livin’s area of operation.

13

What does this mean for livin?

It is imperative that the available housing stock within the community is able to meet the housing demands of its current and future population. An ageing population will create additional future fiscal, housing and health

demands. It will also place significant demand on the types and provision of housing

within an area; many older people now wish to remain in their own home and will

therefore be reliant on mainstream housing to meet this demand. There may be

Key Community Characteristics:

67% of residents in the community are aged 16 to 64 years. This is significantly

higher than the Durham County average. To facilitate good levels of economic

activity within the area it is essential that a high percentage of the population are

of working age and contributing to the local economy through employment or by

actively seeking work.

Only 14% of residents in the community are aged 65 years or more.

25% of households consist of married couples with no dependent children

and 24% of households consist of married couples with dependent children.

Only 22% of households consist of single persons. This is lower than the

Durham County average. Durham County Council projections indicate that the

number of single households will significantly increase over the coming years.

Trend-based projections indicate that the countywide population will increase to

an estimated total of 501,625 in 2026 (DCC, 2010).

Currently the majority of the countywide population fall into the “economically

active” age group; however these residents will soon begin the transition in

retirement and will be the main driver of an ageing population.

By 2026 the number of persons in the “economically active” age group will be less

than present. As a high level of economic activity is a key component of a

sustainable community, efforts must be made to attract more persons within this

age group into the community during the coming years.

An ageing population, and fall in the number of persons economically active by

2026 will place an increased demand on fiscal, housing and health provisions.

99% of residents are White British; with the remaining 1% being of Irish, Other

White, or Mixed White and Asian ethnic origin. The prominent religion in the

community is Christianity (87%).

14

requirements for extra help and services to assist people adapt their homes to meet

their changing needs.

Currently 47% of livin’s housing stock within this community consists of one and two

bedroom bungalows. To meet current and future housing demands of the ageing

population that is expected to emerge countywide over the coming years, there will

be a requirement for livin to complete a comprehensive review of the provision and

suitability of the current housing stock for older persons. In addition, some vulnerable

groups may require more intensive support or bespoke housing solutions to meet

this future demand.

To facilitate good levels of economic activity in a community it is essential that a high

percentage of the population are contributing to the local economy through

employment or actively seeking work.

An understanding of the ethnic and religious structure of the local population will

enable livin to ensure that their services are equally accessible, responsive and

tailored to the needs and requirements of all residents living within our local

communities.

1.2 Housing

1.2.1 Housing Tenure

Bishop Middleham has a varied range of housing tenures. This is very important as a

diverse mix of housing tenures will positively contribute towards making the village

more sustainable by meeting the needs of a cross section of the population.

More than three quarters of residents living in Bishop Middleham own their properties. 26% of residents own their property outright and 50% own their home through a mortgage or loan scheme.

A lower percentage of social housing (19%) is

located within the village, compared to the County

average of 25%. Social housing consists of

domestic properties which are owned by

Registered Providers (RP’s), housing associations

and the Local Authority. All social housing in

Bishop Middleham that was previously owned by Sedgefield Borough Council is now

owned and managed by livin. There are no households living in shared ownership

properties

A lower percentage (19%)

of social housing is located

in the community,

compared to the County

average of 25%.

15

Figure 1.6: Housing Tenure in Bishop Middleham Source: Census, 2001, LLSOA KS18, 007A

There is a marginally lower than average percentage of households in Bishop

Middleham living in privately rented properties (4%) when compared to the rest of

the County (5%). The private rented sector has always played an important role in

the housing market by offering accommodation for those households unable to

access owner-occupation or socially rented housing.

Tighter controls and restrictions on mortgages and financial lending are likely to

place an even higher future demand on social housing from low income households

or first time buyers. Those households unable to access social housing will be

required to look to the private rented sector to meet their housing need, placing an

even higher demand on this already limited sector.

Generally, Bishop Middleham exhibits a slightly unbalanced housing market with

higher than average levels of owner occupied properties and a lower than average

percentage of social housing and privately rented properties.

26%

50%

0%

18%

1%

4%

1%

Owner Occupied: Owns outright

Owner occupied: Owns with amortgage or loan

Owner occupied: Shared ownership

Rented from: Local Authority -including livin

Rented from: Housing Association /Registered Social Landlord

Rented from: Private landlord orletting agency

Rented from: Other

Only 4% of households in the community are living in privately rented properties

when compared to the rest of the County (5%).

16

There is a local Gypsy and Traveller site located at East Howle, approximately 5

miles from Bishop Middleham. The site is provided by DCC and has 25 permanent

pitches. It is the only permanent site in the local area for the Gypsy, Roma and

Traveller community.

1.2.2 Average House Prices

Land Registry data for January to March 2010 indicates that average house price in DL17 9 (covering Bishop Middleham and West Cornforth) is £105,319. Terraced house prices are on average £72,324.

Figure 1.7: Average House Prices in Bishop Middleham Source: Land Registry, 2011

It has not been possible to gain robust data separating West Cornforth and Bishop Middleham average house prices. However, it is recognised that, given the makeup of the village and the comparative affluence compared to West Cornforth, there will be a difference in local house prices that warrants further investigation. The County Durham Strategic Housing Market Assessment (DCC, 2008) assessed

affordability between lower quartile house prices and lower quartile earnings. Based

on these figures buyers would need to borrow 4.6 times their income (based on

lower quartile earnings) to purchase a property (based on lower quartile house

prices) in the area of the former Sedgefield Borough.

For Bishop Middleham the multiplier is 5.45; resulting in a community ranking of

SILVER. Full details of the methodology for this ranking can be found in Appendix 2.

During the consultation there were concerns from residents about the affordability of

property in the village for first time buyers as a result of reduced mortgage products

and financial lending. Residents perceive a need for the provision of “affordable”

£178,600

£98,029

£72,324

£105,319

£0

£20,000

£40,000

£60,000

£80,000

£100,000

£120,000

£140,000

£160,000

£180,000

£200,000

Detached Semi-Det Terraced Total Averages

Pri

ce £

17

homes within the village that would allow first time buyers and young families access

to the housing market.

Although there are a number of current Government incentives available nationwide

to help first time property buyers these are only available on new build properties.

There are currently only two housing developments within the local area (outside of

Bishop Middleham) which are eligible for buyers to obtain help from the Home Buy

Scheme. These can be found at Ferryhill Station and Spennymoor; with the latter

only being available until March 2012. It is currently unknown if the Home Buy

scheme will be extended past March 2012.

A new scheme called First Buy will be introduced from September 2011. The

scheme will be jointly funded by the Government and house builders and will provide

a 20% loan to top up the first time buyer’s own deposit of 5%. This will allow them to

take out a mortgage for 75% of the property’s value. The loan will be free of charge

for the first five years and must be repaid when the property is resold. The funds will

then be recycled to fund more homes in the scheme. It is not yet known if any of the

First Buy schemes will be made available within the local area.

What does this mean for livin?

livin only has a small stake of the housing market within this community given the

lower than average percentage of social housing in the village. The private rented

sector in the village is also comparatively small. Despite the small percentage of

Key Housing Market Characteristics:

The community has a wide range of Housing Tenures; this is important as a

diverse mix of tenures will contribute towards making an area more sustainable

by meeting the need of a cross section of the population.

76% of households own their property outright, or through a mortgage or loan

scheme.

The community has a lower percentage of Social Housing (19%) when

compared to the rest of Durham County.

Only 4% of properties in the community are privately rented properties. The

private rented sector plays an important part in any local housing market as it is

able to offer accommodation for those unable to access owner occupation or

social housing.

Residents perceive a need for “affordable” housing within the community; to

enable first time buyers and young families access to the housing market.

18

social housing within the village it is important to recognise that livin will still be

required to play a role in balancing the local housing market within the community by

making efforts to meet the housing needs identified in DCC’s Housing Strategies.

livin needs to consider the health of the local housing market and the ability of

households to meet their own housing need. Lack of access to the owner occupier

and the private rented sectors could increase pressure on livin’s housing stock,

particularly for single households, young couples and families.

1.2.3 Current Supply and Demand for Housing

livin Housing Stock

livin currently owns and manages a total of 73 properties in Bishop Middleham (livin,

2011). Ownership of these properties transferred to livin in March 2009 as part of a

stock transfer from the now disbanded Sedgefield Borough Council.

These 73 properties include one and two

bedroom bungalows, and two and three

bedroom houses. livin currently do not own any

three bedroom bungalows or four bedroom

properties within the village. Any households

requiring a four bedroom property will be

required to consider accessing the private

rented sector or move away from the village to

meet their housing need.

A breakdown of livin’s stock in Bishop Middleham and the age profile of lead tenants

can be seen in the following tables:

Property Types

1 Bed Bungalows 17

2 Bed Bungalows 17

2 Bed Houses 16

3 Bed Houses 23

Total 73 Figure 1.8: livin stock in Bishop Middleham (as at 14 March 2011) Source: livin, 2011

livin own 73 properties in the

community; 53% of these are

two and three bedroom

houses and 47% are one

and two bedroom

bungalows.

19

Figure 1.9: Age profile of livin lead tenants in Bishop Middleham (as at 14 March 2011) Source: livin, 2011

Currently 53% of livin’s housing stock in Bishop Middleham consists of two and three

bedroom houses with the remaining 47% of stock consisting of one and two

bedroom bungalows.

Current housing demand within the community is high for properties with two or more

bedrooms. Although the bungalows located within the community can be utilised to

meet the future demand of an ageing population and for those wishing to remain in

mainstream housing through their later years, current policies can prevent lettings to

younger couples, families and smaller households. This means that households

unable to meet their housing need due to an inability to access owner-occupation,

social housing or the private rented sector will be forced to move away from the

village. As the majority of persons within these households are likely to be

economically active their move from the village has the potential to see a downturn in

the local economy and sustainability.

livin Housing Demand, Need and Turnover

Since the 1 October 2009 livin has allocated

properties through a Choice Based Lettings (CBL)

Scheme, known as Durham Key Options (DKO).

DKO is a partnership of local housing providers

across County Durham. CBL allows applicants to

place an interest, or “bid”, for the type of property

they require based on their circumstances.

Analysis of livin’s housing register in February 2011 found there to be 29 active

applications for housing received from residents already living in Bishop Middleham.

48% of these applicants were banded by DKO as Bands A to C+, highlighting a high

level of housing need. This percentage of households in housing need may be linked

to the inability of households to obtain a mortgage due to current lending restrictions

or the restricted access to the private rented and social housing sectors due to low

levels of this stock type within the village.

Age Range (based on age of lead tenant)

16-20 years 1

21-30 years 6

31-40 years 12

41-50 years 9

51-60 years 6

61-70 years 12

71-80 years 12

81 years or more 15

Unknown (Void, non livin managed) 0

Total 73

There are currently 13

households from Bishop

Middleham that are

registered with Durham

Key Option and in

housing need.

20

During the period 1 October 2009 to 30 September 2010, there were 6 livin

properties available for let in Bishop Middleham meaning the housing stock turnover

within the community was 8%. This is slightly lower than the average turnover when

compared to the total turnover of all livin housing stock (9%) for the same period.

Based on national benchmarking figures provided by HouseMark, this stock turnover

means the community is ranked as SILVER for Tenancy Turnover. Full details of the

methodology used for this ranking can be found in Appendix 2.

To maintain sustainability within a community there will always be a need for some

level of tenancy turnover. However, it is important that turnover does not reach a

level where it becomes detrimental to housing demand, the community’s reputation

or the local economy. At this time livin are unable to provide further analysis

surrounding the reasons for tenancy turnover within this community.

The types of properties available for let within the village are one and two bedroom

bungalows, and two and three bedroom houses.

Countywide there is a high demand for two bedroom

properties. Low turnover and limited availability of two

bedroom houses and bungalows owned by livin in

Bishop Middleham will require households with a

housing need for these property types to consider other

housing options.

For many households, including first time buyers or those on a low income, buying a

home is not a viable option leading to increased demand on the private rented

sector. High market rents or a lack of availability of larger properties within this

housing sector may ultimately force some households to move out of the local area

in search of suitable accommodation.

A breakdown of livin properties available for let in Bishop Middleham during the

period 1 October 2009 to 30 September 2010 is detailed below:

Figure 1.10: livin properties available for let during the period 1 October 2009 to 30 September 2010 in Bishop Middleham Source: livin, 2011

There were a total of 69 bids received for these 6 properties within the village. Based

on the number of bids received the type of property with the highest demand was the

two bedroom house, which received a total of 19 bids. There was also a good level

of demand for the three bedroom house.

One Bedroom Bungalow

Two Bedroom Bungalow

Two Bedroom House

Three Bedroom House

1 2 1 2

During the 1 October

2009 to 30 September

2010 there was high

demand for two

bedroom houses.

21

It is however important to remember that policy decisions and legislation will affect

the levels of demand for particular house types. High demand for two bedroom

houses could be due to need and eligibility from several household groups including

families, couples, and single persons whereas three and four bedroom properties will

only be eligible for larger families to let, and bungalows will only be eligible for older

persons or those with a medical need. It is therefore important that lettings policies

are regularly reassessed to reflect the supply of housing and the current levels of

demand with the aim of promoting sustainability within an area.

Demand for the one bedroom bungalow within the

village was low, with only 4 bids being received.

Throughout the County there is currently an

increased demand for bungalows with two

bedrooms or more (County Durham Strategic

Housing Market Assessment, 2010).

This is reflected in the letting information for Bishop Middleham for the period 1

October 2009 to 30 September 2010 which indicates a higher level of demand for

two bedroom bungalows when compared to one bedroom bungalows in the area. A

total of 23 bids were received for the two bedroom bungalows that were available for

let. Comparing the current population within the village to the 2028 forecasted

population, (DCC 2010) indicates that demand for larger sized bungalows will

continue to increase over the next 10 years.

Of the 6 properties available to let in Bishop

Middleham during the period 1 October 2009 to 30

September 2010 none were classed as “Hard to let”.

Hard to let properties are defined as properties that

have been advertised in a CBL bidding cycle three

times or more with DKO.

Data from DKO’s database indicates a reasonable

level of demand from applicants for livin housing in Bishop Middleham. The number

of bids received per property, the absence of hard to let properties and the

percentage of applicants indicating Bishop Middleham as an area of preference has

resulted in the community being ranked as SILVER. Full details of the methodology

used for this ranking can be found in Appendix 2.

During livin’s consultation events there were concerns expressed by residents about

the affordability of properties within the village. Residents are concerned that the

cost of property within Bishop Middleham and the current restrictions and tight

controls on mortgages and financial lending is resulting in many first time buyers

being unable to access the housing market. Residents commented on there being

few properties owned by livin within Bishop Middleham, with particular reference to

the small number of bungalows and property suitable for older persons.

During the 1 October 2009

to 30 September 2010 the

demand for one bedroom

bungalows was low.

“There is a demand for

‘affordable’ housing

within the village.”

Resident from Bishop

Middleham

22

1.2.4 livin Tenancy Sustainment

There is a high percentage of long term tenancy

sustainment within properties owned by livin in

Bishop Middleham. This is reflected in the low

level of turnover of housing stock within the

village. The small number of properties owned

by livin within Bishop Middleham combined with

high levels of tenancy sustainment is resulting in restricted access to social housing

within the village for many residents.

As at 7 March 2011, 29% of livin tenants within Bishop Middleham had maintained

their current tenancy for a period of between 0 to 4 years, 24% of tenants had

maintained their tenancy for a period of 5 to 9 years and 47% of tenants had lived in

their current home for 10 years or more.

Community sustainability requires an appropriate level of tenancy turnover. High

levels of tenancy sustainment within social housing can be for a multitude of

reasons. Although some may be favourable it is important to ensure that tenants are

not remaining in their current home due to restrictions in their housing options (i.e.

inability to purchase their own property), or if looking for a more suitable property to

meet their housing need together with financial restrictions around the cost of

relocating.

Figure 1.11: livin tenancy sustainment within Bishop Middleham

Source: livin, 2011 (not including void properties or non livin managed properties)

High levels of tenancy sustainment will often be found in areas where there are a

number of properties that are used to house older households or those with medical

need. As increasing numbers of older households are now making the decision to

remain in mainstream housing through their later years rather than move into

specialised accommodation it is expected that tenancy sustainment will place an

even higher level of demand on the availability of social housing within the village in

the future.

29%

24%

47%

0 - 4 years

5 - 9 years

10 years +

47% of tenants who have a

livin tenancy in this community

have lived in their current

home for 10 years or more.

23

High levels of tenancy sustainment may also result in housing stock being under

occupied. Larger households may over time reduce in size due to children growing

up and leaving home, relationship breakdowns and bereavements. In addition to a

detrimental effect on the level of housing demand within a community there may be

financial implications to the tenant as a result of the Government’s forthcoming

Welfare Reform which aims to reduce benefit payments for households that are

under occupying their property (excluding those over 65 years).

1.2.5 Vacant/Abandoned Properties

High levels of void or empty properties can be a

strong indicator of low demand for housing within

an area. Bishop Middleham has a low

percentage of housing stock consisting of empty

and/or abandoned properties; this indicates a

high level of demand.

Information obtained from DCC Council Tax database at the end of December 2010

indicates there to be 9 possible empty and/or abandoned properties (this figure may

include properties that are currently for sale) within Bishop Middleham. Based on a

total of 574 domestic dwellings (Office for National Statistics, 2009) in the village this

is only 1.6% of the total stock. Data collection limitations have restricted further

detailed analysis of this information.

During December 2010, a low

percentage of properties within

the village were vacant /

abandoned.

24

What does this mean for livin?

Demand for livin housing in this community has been ranked as SILVER. It is

essential that this ranking is maintained to this level or enhanced to Gold over the

coming year.

The projection of an ageing population throughout the County over the coming years,

in conjunction with high levels of demand for properties with two bedrooms or more,

highlights a clear need for livin to review its provision of current housing stock to

meet the current and future housing needs of the local population. It is important that

current housing stock is able to meet the demand for housing within a community.

Key Supply and Demand Characteristics:

livin currently own 73 properties within the community; 53% are two and three

bedroom houses and 47% are one and two bedroom bungalows.

There are no three bedroom bungalows or four bedroom properties owned by

livin in the community

48% of applicants on the housing register that currently live in the community were

classed as having a Housing Need (Bands A to C+)

During 1 October 2009 to 30 September 2010, 6 properties became available for

let; making tenancy turnover within the community 8%.

During 1 October 2009 to 30 September 2010 there was low turnover of two and

three bedroom properties. Households requiring these property types may be

forced to access the private rented sector or move out of the village to meet their

housing need.

Demand for properties with 2 bedrooms or more is high. Demand is low for one

bedroom bungalows in the community.

livin lettings policy normally restricts the letting of bungalows to persons aged 60

years or more, unless there is a medical need. This restricts the availability of

social housing within the community for households that do not meet the

eligibility criteria for a bungalow.

Local residents are concerned about the affordability of properties within the

village and access to the housing market for first time buyers. They feel that the

limited availability of social housing within the community is resulting in many

households being forced to move out of the area to meet their housing need.

47% of livin tenants living within the community have sustained their tenancy for

a period of 10 years or more.

25

Current low demand for one bedroom bungalows indicates that this property type is

no longer meeting housing demand in the community resulting in the need for a

stock options appraisal and review of livin’s housing provision for older persons.

livin owns a small number of housing stock with two bedrooms or more within the

village; only 17 of these properties are two bedroom bungalows. Based on DCC’s

identified need for two bedroom bungalows and the 2028 population projections, it is

expected that this demand for larger sized bungalows will continue to increase over

the next 10 years.

Community sustainability requires an appropriate level of tenancy turnover. It is

important that consideration be given to the reasons behind high levels of

sustainment to ensure residents are not being forced to remain in their current home

due to restrictions in their housing options or financial circumstances.

1.2.6 Future Demand for Housing

Future population and household projections for a community can be utilised by a

number of different service providers to predict the future level of demand on their

services. In conjunction with other social, economic, and environmental indicators

these projections may be used to forecast the demand and need for housing in a

community.

DCC have recently conducted a Strategic Housing Market Assessment (DCC, 2010)

which can be utilised by registered housing providers to help determine the expected

level of demand for housing over the coming years and assist them in developing

their future housing strategies. The following population and household projections

are based on this assessment and other intelligence gathered during the completion

of this Community Plan.

It is expected that the vast majority of older persons will decide to remain in their own

homes with mainstream housing providing the primary means of meeting this

demand.

Local housing providers will be required to support this by providing extra support

services and help for people to adapt their homes to meet their changing needs.

Some vulnerable groups will require support or bespoke housing solutions and it is

expected that there will be a sharp growth in demand for specialist housing projects

for persons aged 75 years or older during the coming years.

The decisions of older households to remain in their homes will influence the supply

of housing available for other household groups. As a result, it is important that local

housing providers recognise the potential opportunities for supporting older

households to downsize, thus releasing a supply of larger family homes for other

household groups.

26

In recognition of this increased demand on mainstream housing the Northern

Housing Consortium (NHC) published a guide to Age Friendly Neighbourhoods in

the North: People and Places 2020. This publication is the result of a two year

project involving consultation with local communities and key Consortium members,

and focuses on building an evidence base to demonstrate the significant impact

housing can have on the physical and mental health and wellbeing of older people.

What does this mean for livin? livin’s Development and Asset Management strategies must take into account future

population projections and consider the expected demand for social housing within

the community to ensure the housing stock meets the needs of local residents.

livin will also have to consider its current housing provision and how it will meet the

need of an increasing elderly population whilst also finding bespoke solutions to

meet the individual needs of vulnerable groups.

Anticipation of an ageing population and poor demand for livin’s one bedroom

bungalows and sheltered housing schemes in other communities highlights the

requirement for livin to review its current provision of housing stock for older persons.

There may be potential opportunities for housing providers to support older

households to downsize thus releasing a supply of larger family homes for other

household groups.

Key Future Demand Characteristics:

By 2026 the number of persons in the “economically active” age group will total

less than present. This will increase demand on fiscal, housing and health

provisions.

By 2030 the County is expected to see:

single person households increase by 100.3%

two person households increase by only 18%

three person households or more decrease by 26.9%

The majority of older persons will want to remain in their own homes through their senior years. This will place an increased demand on mainstream and social housing.

Increased future demand is expected for support services for vulnerable groups, and a need for bespoke housing solutions or specialist housing projects for persons aged 75 years or more. It is important that livin’s housing stock is able to meet the future demands of an ageing population.

.

27

During 2009/10, livin’s average repair cost per property in Bishop Middleham was

£643.

During 2010/2011, livin improved 37 of its properties in Bishop Middleham at an

average cost of £8,020 per property.

1.2.7 Average cost of Repairs to livin properties

The repair and maintenance of livin’s properties is essential to ensure that they

remain in excellent condition and to the high standards expected by tenants. Bishop

Middleham has been awarded a ranking of SILVER for average repair costs per

property when compared to other livin communities. Full details of the methodology

used for this ranking can be found in Appendix 2.

During the period 01 April 2009 to 31 March 2010 livin, together with its repairs and

maintenance partner Mears, completed 278 repairs to properties in Bishop

Middleham. 35% of these repairs were emergency repairs which required immediate

attention.

1.2.8 Average cost of Improvement Programmes for livin properties

Over the next few years, and as part of the promises to tenants, livin is investing

over 100 million pounds in a rolling programme of modernisation and improvements

to the properties that they own.

The modernisation and improvement programme that livin is carrying out on its

properties is to a much higher standard of works than that of the Government's

Decent Homes Standard.

The improvements that livin are completing include:

New Kitchens

New Bathrooms

Central Heating Replacement

Electrical Works

Internal and External Door Replacement

Roofing works

During our programmes of works not all of the properties will receive all of the above

improvements at the same time.

There are a number of factors that determine which improvement works are

completed at the property during forthcoming programmes in each community. For

example some properties may only receive new internal and external doors, whereas

others may be due new internal and external doors plus replacement of the kitchen

and bathroom.

28

During the period December 2010 to

April 2011 the level of crime within

Bishop Middleham was “Average”.

(Police.uk)

A number of improvement programmes have already been completed in the area

with modernisations and improvements made to 37 properties during the period 1

April 2010 to 31 March 2011. The majority of properties in the village have had new

kitchens, bathrooms, internal and external doors fitted, and a full electrical rewire

completed.

What does this mean for livin?

The community has a reasonable repair cost per property resulting in a ranking of

SILVER. However over one third of the repairs required to livin properties in the

community during 2009/2010 were emergencies. Investigation into the causes of

these repairs may be considered in an attempt to minimise the amount of emergency

repairs required within the properties.

It should be noted that during 2010/2011 livin conducted a number of improvement

programmes within Bishop Middleham resulting in 37 of their properties receiving a

new kitchen, bathroom and a full property rewire. It is expected that as a result of

this improvement programme there will be a reduction in the repair costs for these

properties during the coming years.

1.3 Crime and Antisocial Behaviour

The village of Bishop Middleham is located in the Police Beat area of Bishop

Middleham and Cornforth Ward. Although there is a local Police Office located within

Ferryhill Village centre, this is only used as a base for the Neighbourhood Beat Team

and is not permanently staffed. The nearest staffed station is located in the

neighbouring town of Spennymoor.

Figure 1.12: Bishop Middleham and Cornforth Police Beat Area

Source: Police.uk

For the period 1 December 2010 to 30

April 2011 Durham Constabulary reported

the level of crime and disorder within

Bishop Middleham and Cornforth Ward to

29

be “Average” when compared with the rest of England and Wales.

During this period there were a total of 17 reported incidents of crime and antisocial

behaviour in Bishop Middleham (Police.uk, 2011). Of this total 64% were in relation

to antisocial behaviour, 18% were in relation to “other” crimes (including criminal

damage, shoplifting and drugs) 6% were in relation to violence against a person, 6%

for vehicle crime and a further 6% for burglary.

livin’s Support and Intervention Team received 1 complaint of harassment and

intimidation occurring within Bishop Middleham during the period 1 April 2010 to 31

March 2011.

Consultation completed by DCC for the 4 Together AAP indicates that youths

congregating on local streets is a countywide issue and one of the main reason

residents feel unsafe living in their local area. 3% of residents living in the 4 Together

areas (Ferryhill, Chilton, West Cornforth and Bishop Middleham) stated they felt

unsafe in their local communities during the day and 14% felt unsafe during the

evening.

During livin’s consultation event there were no concerns raised by residents about

antisocial behaviour being caused by youths in the village. Anecdotal evidence from

livin staff and other local service providers does however indicate that groups of

youths congregating on local streets is often seen as a problem within many of our

local communities.

The presence of young people congregating on local streets can often suggest a

need for an enhanced programme of diversionary activities (e.g. sporting events or

activities, play or craft activities and youth clubs) within the local area. Research has

proven that the provision of diversionary activities that have been developed in

conjunction with the young persons living in the targeted area can have a positive

effect on lowering levels of antisocial and nuisance behaviour.

Residents have raised concerns during consultation about fly tipping and antisocial

behaviour from vehicles around the area of Pit Lane and the Old Quarry nature

reserve.

30

What does this mean for livin?

It is important that livin maintain our commitment to providing a robust and

responsive service for dealing with incidents of nuisance and antisocial behaviour

within our local communities.

Partnership working with the Police, DCC and other agencies is essential when

dealing with crime and antisocial behaviour. livin is already a contributing partner to

the Safe Durham Partnership and plays an important role in supporting the

partnership to help people feel safer within their local communities.

Key Crime and Antisocial Behaviour Characteristics:

For the period 1 December 2010 to 30 April 2011 the level of crime and

disorder within the Bishop Middleham and Cornforth Ward is considered by

the Police to be “Average” when compared with the rest of England and Wales

During the same period there were 17 reported Police Incidents in Bishop

Middleham:

- 64% of reported incidents were in respect of antisocial behaviour

- 18% of incidents related to other crimes, such as criminal damage,

shoplifting and drugs

- 6% related to violence against a person

- 6% related to vehicle crime

- 6% related to burglary

During the period 1 April 2010 to 31 March 2011, livin’s Support and

Intervention Team received 1 complaint of nuisance and harassment within

the community.

A recent AAP survey found that 14% of residents living in the areas of Bishop

Middleham, Ferryhill, Chilton and West Cornforth felt unsafe in their

communities during the evening.

Local residents are concerned about fly tipping and antisocial behaviour

from vehicles in the area around Pit Lane and the Nature Reserve

31

During 2001 67.1% of residents in Bishop Middleham were economically

active. This was substantially higher than the County average of 60.2%

(Census, 2001, LLSOA KS09A, 007A)

1.4 Economy and Employment

1.4.1 Economic Activity

“Economic activity relates to persons aged 16 to 74 years who are in employment,

or actively seeking employment and are available to start work within 2 weeks.”

(Census, 2001)

Of this total economic activity 44.1% were in full time employment and 11.3% in part

time employment. There were high levels of self-employment (8.8%) within the

village; this being considerably higher than the County average of 5.4%. This high

level of economic activity through employment can be attributed to the majority of the

population within Bishop Middleham being aged between 16 to 64 years, these being

the most common years during which persons are employed.

There was unemployment of 2.5% and the remaining 0.5% of the population were

full time students. It is acknowledged that as a result of the current economic climate

the level of economic activity within the area may have changed since this data was

collated during the Census of 2001.

Figure 1.13: Economic Activity in Bishop Middleham

Source: Census, 2001, LLSOA KS09A, 007A

11.3

44.1

8.8

2.5 0.5 10.7 38.5 5.4 3.7 1.8 0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

EmployeesPart-time

EmployeesFull-time

SelfEmployed

Unemployed Full timeStudent

%

BishopMiddleham

Durham County

32

In 2001, 45% of residents in Bishop Middleham were employed in skilled

roles as Professionals (Doctor, Dentist), Managers, or Associate

Professional and Technical roles.

(Census, 2001, LLSOA KS12A, 007A)

The availability of local employment was a key issue highlighted by residents during

consultation. Residents feel that a lack of local employment has placed an increased

requirement on residents to travel out of the area to obtain sustainable employment.

This necessity to travel is being hampered by rising fuel costs and the affordability of

car ownership, together with an increased reliance on what is seen by residents to

be an unreliable and irregular bus service to surrounding areas. They feel that

employment opportunities for many of the younger residents living in the village are

being adversely affected by access to reliable and affordable public transport to

provide access to further education colleges or employment.

Residents also felt that better links with the

Voluntary Sector and local community groups

could be utilised to help increase employability

amongst local residents.

It is expected that the retail and commercial

development of the Durham Gate site at

Spennymoor and the Hitachi factory in Newton

Aycliffe will help to boost economic activity and

increase employment opportunities for local

residents.

Census data indicates that residents within Bishop Middleham are currently

employed in a wide range of different occupations (Census, 2001, LLSOA KS12A,

007A). 45% of residents are employed in skilled roles as professionals (e.g. Doctor,

Dentist), managers, or associate professional and technical roles. There are

substantially higher percentages of people employed in these occupations when

compared to the County average. High levels of employment within these

occupations are also reflected in the high percentage of residents (21%) in the

village who hold an educational qualification at levels 4 to 5 (section 4.7).

The percentage of residents in Bishop Middleham employed in a skilled trade

(13%) is comparative with the County average. However there are lower

percentages of residents employed in manual occupations including elementary

(labourers, kitchen assistants and bar staff) and plant and machine processing

roles. Over the past ten years the plant and machine processing industry has been

one of the hardest hit resulting in many large scale local employers such as Black

and Decker, Flymo, Thorn, and Electrolux relocating or ceasing to trade.

“We need more local job

opportunities for young

persons in the area”

Resident from Bishop

Middleham

33

As the majority of residents within Bishop Middleham are not employed within these

industries a high level of economic activity will have been maintained within the

village.

Figure 1.14: Occupation profile of 16 to 74 year olds in Bishop Middleham Source: Census, 2001, LLSOA, KS12A, 007A

During 2001 economic inactivity within the village was 32.9%; this being lower than

the County average of 39.8% (Census, 2001, LLSOA, KS12A, 007A). Retirement

(15.1%) was the main reason for people within Bishop Middleham being

economically inactive. This is comparable with the County average where retirement

equates to 14.8% of economic inactivity.

18

11

16

10

13

7

5

11

9

12 9 12 12 13 7 8 13 14 0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

%

BishopMiddleham

DurhamCounty

34

During 2011 the percentage of

residents in the Ward area of

Bishop Middleham and

Cornforth claiming Jobseekers

Allowance for up to 6 months

was higher than the County

average.

(DWP, 2011)

Figure 1.15: Economic inactivity in Bishop Middleham Source: Census, 2001, LLSOA KS12A, 007A

Analysis of Department for Works and

Pensions (DWP) data from March 2011

highlights that the Ward area of Bishop

Middleham and Cornforth has a higher

percentage of persons who have been

claiming Jobseekers Allowance for up to 6

months (76.4%) when compared to the

County average (73.5%). Data collection

limitations do not allow for this information to

be obtained for Bishop Middleham alone.

Long term unemployment (6 to 12 months) is also higher in this area than both

County and National averages. 20% of residents have been claiming Jobseekers

Allowance for a period of 6 to 12 months when compared to 18% throughout the

County and 17.3% at National level. However, the percentage of residents claiming

Jobseekers Allowance for 12 months or more (3.6%) is less than half the County

average (8.4%) and significantly lower than the National average of 14.2%.

As a result of a higher than average percentage of residents claiming Jobseekers

Allowance for a period of 6 to 12 months the community has been ranked as

BRONZE for long term unemployment. It is important to note that the data used to

compile this ranking relates to the Ward of Bishop Middleham and Cornforth; not

Bishop Middleham alone. Full details of the methodology for this ranking can be

found in Appendix 2.

Sustainable communities require high levels of economic activity; this can be

facilitated by a high percentage of the resident population being economically active.

15.1

4.7 5.2 5.9

2.0 14.8 5.1 6.3 10.3 3.3 0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

%

BishopMiddleham

Durham County

35

It is important that local service providers continue to work in partnership to

proactively identify and minimise barriers to employment experienced by local

residents with the aim of helping them back into sustainable employment within the

shortest period of time possible.

1.4.2 Jobseeker Allowance Claimants In August 2009 residents in Bishop Middleham that were unemployed and claiming

Jobseekers Allowance were aged between 16 to 49 years old (DWP, 2009).

67% of persons claiming Jobseekers Allowance were aged between 16 to 24 years;

this being more than double the County average of 32%. However, the number of

persons aged between 25 to 49 years old within Bishop Middleham claiming

Jobseekers Allowance was lower than the County average. There were no persons

aged 50 years or more claiming Jobseekers Allowance.

Figure 1.16: Jobseeker Allowance claimants in Bishop Middleham

Source: DWP, August 2009

The percentage of persons aged 16 to 24 years claiming Jobseekers Allowance was

substantially higher than both the Country and North East averages. This highlights a

clear need for service providers to target this age group when delivering future skills

and training courses. It is important that the provision of future skills and training

courses targeted at this age group helps the individual to meet their training needs

and future aspirations to help them gain sustainable employment.

67

33

0 32 53 15 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Claimants aged 16-24Claimants aged 25-49 Claimants aged 50+

%

Bishop Middleham

Durham County

36

During consultation a number of residents expressed concerns about the lack of

local employment opportunities for young persons

living in the village.

In order to access training and employment residents

are required to travel out of the village to surrounding

towns and cities.

Many feel that this requirement to travel is restricted

by the cost of owning private transport and the

restricted timetables and routes covered by local bus

companies. There are concerns that ongoing service

cuts imposed by DCC may see local bus timetables

further reduced thus restricting access to further education, training and employment

for many residents. It was also thought that there were very few opportunities for

apprenticeships for young persons in the area.

1.4.3 Department for Works and Pensions Key Benefit Claimants

During August 2009, an average of 12% of residents living in Bishop Middleham

aged 16 to 64 years were claiming a key benefit (DWP, 2009). Of this total, 6% were

claiming Incapacity Benefit as a result of a disability or illness.

Figure 1.17: Breakdown of persons claiming key benefits within Bishop Middleham

Source: DWP, August 2009

“We need a better

transport service so

young people have easy

access college and

employment.”

Resident from Bishop

Middleham

2

6

1

1

0

1

1 0

Job Seekers

Incapacity Benefits

Lone Parent

Carer

Others on Income Related Benefits

Disabled

Bereaved

Unknown

37

1.4.4 Household Income

During 2001/02 estimates of the mean gross weekly household income in the Ward

area of Bishop Middleham and Cornforth was £20 per week lower than the North

East average of £410 (ONS, 2005). Data collection limitations have restricted further

detailed analysis of this information to Bishop Middleham only.

Based on this intelligence the community has been ranked as BRONZE for average

household income. It is important to note that the data used to compile this ranking

relates to the Ward of Bishop Middleham and Cornforth and not Bishop Middleham

alone. Full details of the methodology for this ranking can be found in Appendix 2.

Although residents had no specific comments surrounding levels of household

income there is clear recognition of a need for increased employment opportunities

for local residents.

1.4.5 Vehicle Ownership and Cost of Travel

In 2001, only 18% of households in Bishop Middleham did not own a car or van; this

being substantially less than the County average of 31%. 82% of households owned

one or more cars or vans (Census, 2001, LLSOA, KS17, 007A).

Although levels of vehicle ownership may have changed since 2001, the rising cost

of fuel and other vehicle related costs will now have a significant impact on vehicle

usage, particularly amongst low income households. Low levels of vehicle ownership

and restricted usage can affect residents’ lifestyles by restricting their access to

services and facilities outside of the local area.

Throughout the consultation process a number of residents expressed their concerns

about the ever increasing need for residents to travel outside of the local area for

access to supermarkets, employment and specialist services such as further

education colleges and healthcare. This reliance on travel outside of the local area

places an increased need on a reliable public transport system.

There are fears from residents that the ongoing budgetary reductions to rural

transport services by DCC will see local transport services further reduce resulting in

many residents becoming more isolated and detached from accessing specialist

services and sustainable employment.

38

1.4.6 Rental Debit in livin properties

To assess the rent payments made by tenants within livin properties in Bishop

Middleham an analysis and comparison of livin’s rental debit figures for 2009/10 to

2010/11 have been used.

For the financial year 2009/10, the total rental debit charge (rent charged for all of

livin’s properties in this community) was £254,943. At the end of this financial year

there were outstanding arrears (unpaid rent) of £3,302; making an unpaid rental

debit charge of 1.3%.

For the financial year 2010/11 the total rental debit charge was £261,817. At the end

of this financial year there were outstanding arrears of £1,396; making an unpaid

rental debit charge of 0.53%.

Key Economic characteristics:

During 2001/02 the weekly household income estimate was £20 less than the

North East average of £410.00.

During 2001, economic activity within the community was higher than the

Durham County average.

32.9% of residents in 2001 were not in employment, and not actively seeking

work.

6% of residents were economically inactive due to being permanently sick or

disabled.

During 2001, 45% of residents were employed in professional or management

roles.

During March 2011 short term unemployment (up to 6 months) in the Bishop

Middleham and Cornforth Ward was higher than the County average.

Unemployment of 12 months or more was lower than the County average.

The percentage of residents aged 16 to 64 years that are claiming jobseekers

allowance is significantly higher when compared to the County average.

During August 2009, 12% of residents were claiming a key DWP Benefit. 6% of

this total was claiming Incapacity Benefit.

39

By the end of the financial year 2010/11 livin reduced its outstanding rent arrears

(unpaid rent) by 0.77%; a total of £1,906.

Based on the unpaid rental debit charge of 0.53% for 2010/11 the community has

been ranked as GOLD. Full details of the methodology for this ranking can be found

in Appendix 2.

Over the last year livin has introduced the option for tenants to pay their rent via

Payment Card. The payment card can be accepted at over 60 local outlets (including

Post Offices) wherever the “Paypoint” sign is displayed. This method of payment

which is only one of the many that livin offer, was introduced with the aim of making

access to paying rent as easy and accessible as possible for their tenants.

During livin’s consultation events residents expressed concerns about the rising level

of housing costs and how the current economic climate is increasing the level of debt

for low income households.

What does this mean for livin?

Although livin will aim to reduce the outstanding rental debit year on year the current

economic climate and future reforms to State Welfare Benefits will provide

challenging times. These challenges will require livin to work proactively with their

tenants and other household members by providing a dedicated financial inclusion

team to provide advice, guidance or sign posting about money and debt

management.

livin must be aware of the contribution made by partners in supporting residents and

tenants to gain employment and skills, and increase their economic well-being. We

must support local community organisations that offer these services by ensuring

their resources are fully utilised by local residents and that their existence is widely

publicised throughout the local area.

Consultation has found there to be an identified need for an increased provision of

local skills and training courses that can help more local residents, and specifically

livin tenants, attain new skills and qualifications for employment.

It is evident from the analysis that any employability work undertaken by livin within

the community must help reduce the number of persons claiming Jobseekers

Allowance. There should be extra emphasis placed on residents aged between 16 to

24 years that are claiming Jobseekers Allowance.

livin needs to understand the barriers to employment experienced by residents and

tenants and assess the level of support it can offer. During consultation events

residents were apprehensive about recent financial cut backs to the village’s local

bus services and the effect this is having on access to services and employment.

This reduction in services together with the increasing cost of vehicle ownership has

the potential to make travelling to work a major barrier to employment. The effects of

40

Bishop Middleham is a small village with limited public services and

amenities.

the recession and current economic downturn are being felt by a large number of

households within livin’s local communities. As a result livin must be mindful that

local residents and tenants will potentially need support through these financial

difficulties. This could mean signposting tenants and residents to debt management

and financial inclusion support agencies.

1.5 Access to Services and facilities

There is no local GP or Dental surgery located in the village. Access to public health

care can be found in the surrounding settlements of Ferryhill, Chilton, West Cornforth

and Sedgefield.

The only retail services located within the village are the local Post Office and shop,

Butchers (with café) and a nearby Farm Shop. For the requirement of more

specialised goods and services residents are required to travel out of the village to

neighbouring Spennymoor, Bishop Auckland or Newton Aycliffe. Large supermarkets

are also located in these neighbouring towns.

There is a Village Hall within Bishop Middleham which is currently utilised by a

number of local groups and clubs. Some residents feel there to be a need for

improvements to be made to the Village Hall to increase capacity and enable more

local groups to utilise this facility.

Although there is no resident library within the village, DCC provides a fortnightly

mobile library that can be utilised by residents. There are also two public houses

located within the village.

There is a park located within Bishop Middleham providing an area for local children

to play. The park has a multi-use games area managed by DCC, which provides a

fenced non-turfed area that can be used for a number of activities and games.

There are no other recreational or sporting facilities within the village.

On the outskirts of the village is the Old Quarry; now a nature reserve and

designated site of Specific Interest. Access to the site is free and there are a number

of footpaths around the reserve for visitors to use for recreational purposes. Some

residents felt it would beneficial for increased

involvement with Durham Wildlife Trust to promote

and enhance this local facility.

There are concerns about the current and future

availability of public transport in and around the area.

Many residents highlighted concerns about the

reliability, cost and restrictions of the current public

“The village needs to

maintain a reliable local

bus service.”

Resident from Bishop

Middleham

41

transport service and its necessity for providing access for many residents to

employment, education and shopping. A recent survey of residents living within the

4 Together Area Partnership (DCC, 2010) indicated that only 56% were satisfied with

public transport; this being the lowest level of satisfaction throughout the County.

The rising costs of fuel and vehicle maintenance will continue to place an increased

need on a reliable and regular public transport system that serves the needs of the

community as a whole.

There is a fear from residents that future budget cuts will see the level of services

within the area further decrease, together with the possibility of the public transport

service and links to surrounding areas being reduced.

What does this mean for livin?

livin needs to be aware of the positive impact that local services and service

providers have on sustaining local communities.

The closure of local facilities, such as leisure centres could have an impact on

diversionary activities for young people. A reduced bus service within the village will

not only increase the barriers to employment experienced by livin tenants and local

residents but will also restrict their access to supermarkets, education, sporting

facilities and healthcare.

livin needs to understand the pressures that local communities are under as a result

of service cuts, and work in partnership with organisations such as DCC to ensure

Key Services Characteristics:

The community has limited access to public services and amenities.

There is no access to public health care within the community.

Residents have highlighted a need for travel out of the area for shopping,

specialised goods or services.

There is a village hall which is currently utilised by a number of local groups.

The community has a large park and nature reserve nearby; these are the only

recreational facilities.

Satisfaction with the public transport service in the area is poor with many

residents feeling that the current provision is unreliable and restrictive for their

needs.

Residents are concerned that public sector spending cuts will further reduce

transport links with surrounding villages and towns.

42

During 2001, the number

of persons in “Not Good”

health in Bishop

Middleham was 4% lower

than the County average.

that the effects of any service reductions are minimal and that residents are aware of

their implications.

1.6 Health and Well Being

The general level of health in Bishop Middleham is

notably better than that of the County as a whole

(Census, 2001, LLSOA, KS08, 007A). The total

percentage of residents in “Good” general health is

nearly 6% higher than the County average. The

percentage of residents who indicated that they were in

“Not Good” general health is nearly 4% less when

compared to the County average.

2001 Census data indicates that 15.4% of persons of working age suffer from a

limiting long term illness (Census, 2001, LLSOA, KS08, 007A). Again this is lower

than the County average of 19.8%.

“A limiting long-term illness covers any long-term illness, health problem or disability

that limits daily activities or work. Working age is defined as persons aged between

16 to 64 years inclusive for men and 16 to 59 years inclusive for women.”(Census

2001)

Figure 1.18: Levels of Health in Bishop Middleham

Source: Census, 2001, LLSOA, KS08, 007A

Feedback gained during the consultation events highlighted a concern from

residents about the lack of arranged activities and facilities for sport and recreation

within the village. Residents feel the introduction and provision of a number of health

based activities for local residents of all age ranges would be beneficial in promoting

healthy living and increasing the levels of health within the village.

68.5

22.2

9.4 62.6 24.2 13.9 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

General Health:Good

General Health:Fairly Good

General Health: NotGood

%

BishopMiddleham

Durham County

43

To access local sporting facilities residents are required to travel outside of the

village to leisure centres at nearby Ferryhill, Spennymoor and Newton Aycliffe.

Although DCC currently own and manage these leisure centres there are concerns

about the future of Ferryhill’s leisure centre due to the County Council recently

detailing plans of a spending review in respect of its countywide leisure facilities.

The loss of the leisure facility at Ferryhill would see residents being required to travel

further afield to other centres at Spennymoor, Newton Aycliffe or Bishop Auckland.

Access to public transport, together with extra costs relating to travel and the use of

these facilities could prove unaffordable thus restricting access to health based

activities for some members of the community.

What does this mean for livin?

There has been a long established connection between health and housing. As a

result of the Government’s Health Reform proposals a stronger role will emerge for

livin to act in partnership with local health providers to improve the health and

wellbeing of tenants and their families. As a “frontline” service provider livin has

privileged access to tenants and their families; providing the potential for signposting

to health services. Good levels of health can have positive effects on educational

achievement and promote employment within a community.

There are already good levels of health within Bishop Middleham. It is important that

livin utilises involvement and interaction with tenants and their families to maintain

and further enhance this level of health. There are a number of projects that livin

could support that link into the preventative health agenda, making it critical that we

engage and work in partnership with other local health stakeholders to ensure

maximum use of resources

Key Health Characteristics:

During 2001, general levels of health in the Community were higher when

compared to the County average.

15.4% of “working age” residents are suffering from a limiting long term

illness.

Residents are required to travel for access to leisure facilities. Increased

costs associated with travel may result in access to leisure facilities becoming

unaffordable for some local households.

Residents would like to see the provision of more health based activities held

within the village.

44

2001 census data indicates

that 21.3% of residents have

attained qualifications to

degree or professional levels.

1.7 Education and Training

Levels of educational attainment for residents are

higher within Bishop Middleham when compared

to the Durham County average (Census, 2001,

LLSOA, KS13, 007A).

2001 Census data indicates that 26.8% of the

population in the area have no formal qualifications.

The percentages of residents attaining level 1 (17.3%) and level 2 (20.3%)

qualifications are also higher when compared to the County average. Level 1

qualifications include 1+'O' level passes; 1+ CSE/GCSE any grades; NVQ level 1; or

Foundation level GNVQ. Level 2 qualifications include 5+GCSEs (grades A-C); 1+

'A' levels/'AS' levels; NVQ level 2; or Intermediate GNVQ.

Figure 1.19: Educational attainment within Bishop Middleham Source: Census, 2001, LLSOA, KS13, 007A

6.8% of residents hold qualifications at level 3; this being marginally less than the

County average of 7.4%. Level 3 qualifications are necessary for advancement into

University, higher education or professional qualifications and include 2+ 'A' levels;

4+ 'AS' levels; NVQ level 3; or an Advanced GNVQ.

There are a high percentage of residents (21.3%) that hold qualifications at levels

4/5 when compared to the County average (14.5%). A level 4/5 qualification is

equivalent to a First Degree, Higher Degree, NVQ levels 4 and 5, HNC, HND, or

professional qualifications including qualified teacher, medical doctor, dentist, nurse,

26.8

17.3 20.3

6.8

21.3

7.6

36.0

17.0 18.1

7.4

14.5

7.1

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

32

36

%

BishopMiddleham

Durham County

45

midwife, or health visitor. This high level of educational attainment can be attributed

to the high number of persons employed in highly skilled roles as Professionals

(Doctor, Dentist), Managers, or Associate Professional and Technical roles that

reside in the village.

Based on a high percentage of residents living

within village attaining level 2 qualifications (5+

GCSEs A-C grades) the community has been

ranked as GOLD for educational attainment. Full

details of the methodology for this ranking can be

found in Appendix 2.

Although St Michael’s Church of England Primary School is located within the village

residents require access to transport to access secondary schools and higher

education. Local secondary schools are located at Ferryhill, Sedgefield, Spennymoor

and Newton Aycliffe. The nearest further education colleges are located at Bishop

Auckland, Darlington and Durham; all require access to public or private transport.

There is a lot of concern from local residents about the opportunities for training and

education within the village. Residents expressed a desire for the provision of more

skill based courses that will help residents secure future long term employment or

enable them to enter further or higher education. It is also felt that access to

employment and training for young residents through Apprenticeships and skills

based courses is restricted.

Access to further education and employment requires residents to travel out of the

local area, this being hampered by the rising costs of vehicle ownership and what is

seen to be an inadequate public transport service. Residents are also concerned

about the current cost of university tuition and feel this may deter or restrict many

young people and adults from obtaining higher level qualifications thus restricting

future career prospects and job opportunities.

Key Education Characteristics:

There is good access to primary education with St Michael’s COE primary

school being located within the village.

Access to secondary education and colleges requires travel outside of the

community.

In 2001, 26.8% of residents within the community held no formal educational

qualifications.

21.3% of residents within the community are educated to Degree or

Professional level.

Residents are concerned about access to education and training for younger

residents and the cost of University fees.

“Need more educational

opportunities for young

residents”

Resident from Bishop Middleham

46

What does this mean for livin?

Education is a cornerstone of a sustainable community as it will promote financial

inclusion and help increase economic activity.

During 2001, a high percentage of residents within the village were educated to

Degree or Professional level. However residents are concerned that increasing travel

costs and an inadequate public transport service is restricting access to education

and training for many younger residents.

Although livin cannot play a direct role in the provision of education there may be

opportunities to link with local education providers such as local schools and

colleges to help increase educational opportunities for livin’s tenants.

1.8 Reputation of the local area and community cohesion

Feedback gained from the consultation events indicates that the village is perceived

by local residents to be a pleasant and safe place to live.

The residents that attended the consultation events feel

the current level of community cohesion within the village

is good. They believe that local facilities such as the Post

Office and village hall are essential in maintaining

cohesion; and expressed concerns that should these

facilities be lost the level of cohesion and interaction

between residents within the village will likely decrease.

To increase sustainability within an area it is important

that the community is seen as a good place to live with a

good level of community cohesion.

“Community spirit

relies on the provision

of local services such

as the Post Office and

Village Hall.”

Resident from Bishop

Middleham

47

The majority of environmental feedback received from residents during the

consultation events centred on fly tipping and dog fouling.

1.9 Local Environment

Although the Old Quarry nature reserve is frequently used by local residents and

visitors there were concerns raised about increased incidents of fly tipping in the

reserve and antisocial behaviour caused by motor vehicles in the surrounding area.

The issue of dog fouling and the failing of dog owners to remove faeces from public

areas was an issue highlighted at both

consultation events. Residents complained about

dog fouling on public areas within the village and

at the Old Quarry. They felt there to be a clear

need for an increased number of litter and dog

waste bins within the village and areas

surrounding the Old Quarry.

There were also concerns raised about the

amount of litter and dog faeces found on and

surrounding the local playing field and play area. Residents were especially

concerned about the dog faeces in this area and suggested the need for the play

area to be fenced off to prevent access for dogs.

In an attempt to try and combat these issues some residents expressed a wish for a

volunteering programme for local residents to become “Wardens” responsible for

maintaining the appearance and tidiness of the village.

On the 13 April 2011 an Environmental Assessment of the community was

conducted by members of livin’s Community and Improving Communities Teams.

The Assessment was completed by assessing a number of environmental indicators

at a designated “stopping” point on a pre-determined route through the community.

At the designated stopping point a number of environmental indicators were

assessed and a number of points awarded. During the assessment the community

was found to be clean and tidy. There was no or very little evidence of litter, fly

tipping or dog faeces in public areas. Properties within the vicinity of the stopping

point were well maintained with tidy gardens.

Based on the points awarded at the pre-determined stopping point, the community

scored a total value of 31.

As a result the overall condition of the community has been ranked as GOLD. The

full methodology relating to the Environmental Assessment can be found in Appendix

2.

“Litter and dog faeces in

the public play area are a

problem.”

Resident from Bishop

Middleham

48

Figure 1.20: Route of Environmental Assessment

What does this mean for livin?

A high Environmental Assessment scoring and Gold ranking is a good result for the

community. It means that the community does not require intensive support and may

only require targeted work in specific hotspots area.

However, it is important that livin ensure that future Environmental Assessments

within this community are conducted at appropriate intervals to ensure the

community maintains this high ranking.

49

Based on the information contained within this community plan livin has been able to

identify and assess a number of key strengths and challenges that are being faced

by residents living in the community of Bishop Middleham.

To improve the levels of sustainability within this community it is important that key

strengths are maintained; together with conscientious efforts being made by livin,

other community stakeholders and local residents to address and reduce identified

challenges.

Taking into account these challenges livin has developed four key priorities for the

community:

The development of these key priorities and the creation of realistic Local Offers that

can be used by livin, community stakeholders and local residents to address and

achieve them will enable the maximisation of internal and external resources

available throughout the community.

Section 2 Community Priorities

Help to influence and maintain services that benefit the needs of local residents

and the community as a whole.

Develop a partnership approach to reducing barriers to work and increasing

employment opportunities for local residents.

Develop a partnership approach to develop health based initiatives to help

residents adopt healthier lifestyles and improve health levels.

Maintain a partnership approach to reduce incidents of low level crime.

50

The original actions contained within this Community Plan were revised in March

2013.

Based on what livin has learnt from your community, and our work with local partners

we have now developed a set of Local Offers for Bishop Middleham. The Local

Offers have taken into account the original actions from the community plan and the

views of the community obtained through consultation, leading to a new set of

standards and actions aimed at supporting and benefiting your area. Delivery of the

local offers will be monitored by livin tenants.

A copy of livin’s local offers for Bishop Middleham can be found on our website at

www.livin.co.uk.

This main Community Plan will be revised in 2014.

Section 3 Review of the Community Plan

51

APPENDIX 1

livin STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK

&

REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

52

livin Strategic Framework

livin’s role as a Registered Provider of social housing extends beyond managing

houses. This has been identified within livin’s Corporate Plan for 2011 – 2014 which

highlights the importance of improving the economic viability of local communities,

followed by social factors such as health and education, and enhancing the local

environment.

As such livin is focused on supporting the development of sustainable communities

for the current and future generation of residents. This is articulated through the

Company’s vision, mission and personality which are;

Mission “working with the community at heart”

Vision “sustaining and growing safe, cohesive and vibrant communities through

excellent customer services”

Personality “Caring, supportive, helpful and community orientated”

It is acknowledged that livin can play a key role in contributing to the delivery of

sustainable communities. By developing strong and coordinated partnership working

with residents and key stakeholders livin will develop:

Prosperous Communities - addressing economic viability of communities by

helping people to improve their financial circumstances, become less dependent

on benefits, positively address employability and increase financial confidence.

Healthy Communities – addressing social wellbeing, community cohesion and

health inequalities by improving health and wellbeing, secure access to further

opportunities and develop their aspirations.

Green Communities – addressing environmental quality and sustainability by

enhancing the setting of homes and promoting and supporting green initiatives in

communities.

During April 2011, livin introduced the “Your Voice, Local Choice”, Local Offer

document to ensure that “the right services are delivered in the right place for the

right people”. The Local Offer is a list of ten pledges that livin has made to tenants in

order to deliver key priorities. Full details of the pledges contained in livin’s Local

Offer can be found on the website at livin.co.uk or alternatively a copy can be

requested by contacting livin on 0845 505 5500 or 0300 111 2234 (low rate from a

mobile depending on network).

53

In addition to helping livin work towards sustaining and growing safe, cohesive, and

vibrant communities the Community Plans will play an important role in shaping and

articulating the Local Offer to tenants. They are the delivery mechanism for the

pledges contained within the Offer and will enable livin, community stakeholders and

local residents to tailor services and resources to the specific needs of each

individual community and enhance local service delivery. This relationship is

illustrated in the diagram below:

The development and implementation of the Community Plans represents a strategic

change in livin’s approach to supporting the sustainability of communities and will

help deliver the corporate improvement themes of “Customer Focussed Services”

and “Efficient Assets” by:

improving lives, neighbourhoods and communities

improving customer involvement and empowerment, and

increasing the sustainability of tenancies and homes

Local Offer

Established guiding principles

Locality 1

Byers Green

Kirk Merrington

Middlestone Moor

Spennymoor Town

Locality 2

Dean Bank

Ferryhill Village &

Cleves Cross

West Cornforth

Bishop Middleham

Chilton & Chilton Lane

Locality 3

Trimdon Village

Trimdon Grange

Trimdon Colliery

Fishburn

Sedgefield

Locality 4

Shildon

Middridge

Locality 5

Aycliffe Old Town

Aycliffe New Town

Aycliffe Village

Community Plan Strategy

54

The Plans will be utilised to inform and enhance livin’s strategic planning and asset

management framework whilst helping to deliver customer and community focused

investment. They have an impact on all areas of service delivery, renewal and

regeneration, and have departmental cross cutting themes.

Each Plan takes into account a whole spectrum of current national, regional and

local strategic agendas whilst retaining enough flexibility to address future emerging

policy and structural changes at all levels. They complement the Government’s

Localism Bill by facilitating and empowering local communities to improve local

services in their local area and careful consideration has also been given to relevant

housing strategies adopted by Durham County Council and the implications of the

Homes and Communities Agency (HCA) new role in regulating social landlords.

Tenant Services Authority Regulatory Requirements

The development and implementation of Community Plans also reflects livin’s

commitment to adhering to the Tenant Services Authority’s (TSA) current regulatory

regime. This regime requires livin to meet six separate service standards:

Tenant Involvement and Empowerment

Home

Tenancy

Neighbourhood and Community

Value for Money

Governance and Financial Viability

Comprehensive consultation to support each Plan will help livin to enhance customer

services and encourage local residents to become more responsible for local

services and the improvement of their communities thus addressing the Tenant

Involvement and Empowerment standard.

The Home standard will be addressed by assessing the current condition of the

current housing stock in each community to ensure that it is of high quality, well

maintained and suitable for demand.

It is crucial that the Tenancy standard be incorporated into the outcomes of the

Community Plan through the consideration and effective use of lettings policies, rent

management policies and the enhancement of tenancy sustainment.

As part of the Neighbourhood and Community standard livin is required to deliver on

three separate outcomes; local cooperation, antisocial behaviour and community

management. All of these will outcomes will be considered and addressed within the

outcomes of each Plan.

55

The Plans will also address the Value for Money standard by ensuring that livin

prioritise resources based on the actual needs and requirements of local residents

whilst enabling confidence for external stakeholders and businesses to invest in the

communities.

Durham County Council Strategic Framework

Durham County Council’s “Sustainable Communities” Strategy 2010-2030 is the

overarching plan for delivering long lasting improvements throughout the County. It

sets out five key strategic priority themes that will be focused on during the next 20

years:

Altogether Wealthier

Altogether Better for Children and Young People

Altogether Healthier

Altogether Safer

Altogether Greener

Whilst, Registered Providers are essential partners in delivering sustainable

communities, local authorities have the key strategic responsibility in this area. This

is particularly important for livin given its current geographical boundary within

County Durham and its relatively high levels of deprivation. Therefore the

Company’s approach of aligning key elements of its Corporate Plan 2011 – 2014 to

the priorities set out in Durham County Council’s Sustainable Communities Strategy

is vital in allowing the Company to play its role as a key partner in delivering

sustainable communities.

The provision of sustainable communities and vibrant and successful towns sits

within the key strategic theme of “Altogether Wealthier” and places a significant

emphasis on local housing markets and improvements in employability and skills as

key drivers in this achievement. Although the provision of a successful housing

market is predominantly featured in the theme of “Altogether Wealthier” there can be

cross cutting themes across the other four priority themes as demonstrated in the

community plans.

This theme of housing being a key driver in creating sustainable communities is

further detailed in “Building Altogether Better Lives: A Housing Strategy for County

Durham 2010-2015” (DCC, 2010). This strategy focuses on the ability for housing

and other related services to create better life chances for persons living in County

Durham by delivering better housing markets and high quality housing stock through

enhanced partnership working.

56

National Housing Federation

Research conducted by the National Housing Federation (NHF) found that numerous

RP’s are now using their presence and impact within their local communities to

provide services outside of their core housing management activities.

These activities are centred on employment and enterprise services, education and

skills services, wellbeing services, poverty and social inclusion, safety and

community cohesion.

During 2006/07 the NHF found that RP’s nationally delivered 6,800 community

services (including facilities) and invested £435 million (£272 million internal and

£163 external) into resources outside of their core areas of activity. This study

highlighted the prominence that RP’s have within their local communities and their

perfect position to act as place makers in their communities.

Further information and details relating to this research is contained within the full

NHF report, “The scale and scope of housing associations activity beyond housing”.

57

APPENDIX 2

METHODOLOGY

58

livin Communities With the help of livin’s Tenants Panel 19 local communities were defined. These 19

communities are loosely based around Durham Constabulary’s local Police “Beat”

patches and the boundaries of Durham County’s local Area Action Partnerships

(AAP):

To successfully complete each individual Plan a wide range of quantitative and

qualitative data from an extended range of sources has been utilised. Data obtained

from these sources has focused on several social, economic and environmental

indicators. Qualitative data collection methods has required livin to hold a number of

Locality Community Estates

1

Byers Green Byers Green

Kirk Merrington Kirk Merrington

Middlestone Moor Middlestone Moor

Spennymoor Town Town Centre (inc Bessemer Park) York Hill Tudhoe Tudhoe Grange

2

Dean Bank Dean Bank

Ferryhill Village and Cleves Cross Ferryhill Village Cleves Cross

West Cornforth Topside Lowside

Bishop Middleham Bishop Middleham

Chilton and Chilton Lane The Poets Windlestone

3

Trimdon Village Trimdon Village

Trimdon Grange Trimdon Grange

Trimdon Colliery Trimdon Colliery

Fishburn Fishburn

Sedgefield Sedgefield

4

Shildon Central Shildon Jubilee Fields New Shildon

Middridge Middridge

5

Aycliffe Old Town Shafto Simpasture Central

Aycliffe New Town Horndale Agnew Burnhill Western

Aycliffe Village Aycliffe Village

59

consultation events within each community to gain the views and opinions of local

residents; together with anecdotal data from interviews with members of staff from

livin’s Communities and Homes Support Team.

Social, Economic and Environmental Indicators

Several social, economic and environmental indicators have been established for

each community; with some being benchmarked against County and National data

averages.

The table below shows the themes and topics each Community Plan has explored

and the data sources used to populate the required intelligence.

Themes Method

Housing

Quantitative - National statistics, livin stock data, DKO lettings data, Council tax data, Durham County Council strategic housing market assessment, House price websites and Land Registry data

Qualitative - Interviews and consultation events

Crime Rates and Perception of Crime

Quantitative - Durham Constabulary crime data and livin internal data

Qualitative - Interviews and consultation events

Economy and Employment

Quantitative - National statistics and DWP Benefit data

Qualitative – Interviews and consultation events

Accessibility to Services and Facilities

Qualitative - Interviews and consultation events

Health and Well Being Quantitative - National Statistics

Qualitative - Interviews and consultation events

Education and Training Quantitative - National Statistics

Qualitative - Interviews and consultation events

Reputation and Community Cohesion

Qualitative - Interviews and consultation events

Local Environment (including built environment, management of public areas)

Qualitative - Interviews, consultation events and community environmental assessments

60

Community Views and Opinions

The community in Bishop Middleham were invited to tell livin their views, concerns and opinions about their local community. Two

consultation events took place in the Village Hall at the beginning of March 2011.

The table below highlights the main concerns and areas for improvement highlighted by residents during these events:

Themes Community Comments

Housing Demand for a range of "affordable" homes

Not enough housing for single/younger residents

Crime Rates and Perception of Crime

Fly tipping (Nature Reserve and Pit Road)

Cruising/asb from cars at Bishop Middleham (Nature Reserve, Old Quarry and Pit

lane)

Antisocial Behaviour from Vehicles at Bishop Middleham (Nature Reserve and Pit

lane)

Economy and Employment

Connection with parish plan

Need for more local jobs for younger residents

Transport for young people - i.e. bus services for work and college

More involvement with VCS ( Voluntary Community Service)

Use of existing groups to engage with the wider community

Increased employment opportunities at Durham Gate and Hitachi

Accessibility to Services and Facilities

Need to maintain local bus services

Village hall building needs improvements

Public transport (Buses) - irregular services

Capacity of village hall not big enough to support all groups

61

Health and Well Being More opportunities and activities for health and well being

Smoking Cessations (Smoking Clinics)

Education and Training

Need more opportunities for younger residents 16 to 19 years (apprenticeships

and employment skills)

More training & education (Non Accredited Courses)

Restricted access due to public transport service

Reputation and Community Cohesion

Parish council involvement with Community Plan overall

Community spirit is good but relies on keeping post office, cafe and the village Hall

open

Local Environment

Kids like the local area

Need for volunteer Street Wardens

Dog fouling needs clearing

Dog fouling in the park

Need for more dog waste bins (Nature Reserve)

Litter in the park

Fly tipping (Nature Reserve and Pit Road)

More involvement with Durham Wild Life Trust

Need for a fenced off area in the park for younger children

62

Community Ranking Methodology

Based on the intelligence contained within this Community Plan livin has been able to rank the community based on; Bronze

(potential), Silver (aspiring) or Gold (performing). This will enable the identification of the communities which require more

immediate and more intensive interventions whilst ensuring there are mechanisms in place to maintain Gold standards.

The following are details of the methodology used by livin when determining the ranking for each community indicator:

Indicator Ranking

Housing Market

Affordability

Affordability ratios have been devised by comparing income to house prices in order to calculate how many times their average income an individual would be required to borrow to purchase their own property. It is particularly interesting to assess how well lower income households can access the housing market. To gauge access to entry level housing the data used is the lower quartile income of residents within the former area of Sedgefield Borough and the average price of terraced housing within the community (the assumption is that this house type is often the lower quartile house type). Data sources for this information were the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (ASHE) 2010 and land registry house price data. To assess the level of affordability it is important to rank the multiplier by the England average. In England during 2009 the lower quartile house price was 6.28 times the lower quartile full-time individual earnings (http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/corporate/statistics/housingplanningstatistics2010). Access to lending on homes is still calculated using a multiplier of 3.5 for single households and 2.9 for dual income households, therefore a multiplier of 3.5 or less can be deemed as affordable.

Gold = Multiplier of 0 to 3.5 is affordable Silver = Multiplier of 3.6 to 6.3 Bronze = Multiplier of 6.4 and above

Tenancy

Turnover

Tenancy Turnover is determined by the percentage of houses available to let compared with the total housing stock in a community. It is recognised that this methodology is very simplistic and there are several factors that should be considered in conjunction with this ranking. These include:

Turnover rates in specific house types are generally higher than others (one bedroom bungalows) so consideration must be given to the total community stock profile

Gold communities will have a lower tenancy turnover; however a Gold ranking could indicate lack of access to housing and affordability issues requiring more households to have a housing need for socially rented properties in a particular community

It is important that when considering tenancy turnover; further investigation be given to the circumstances surrounding the ranking and circumstances that may have contributed towards a high level of turnover. Further investigation should also be made into stock types within the community and the accessibility and affordability of housing. To compile the percentage rates used to calculate this ranking consideration has

Gold = 5% turnover or less Silver = 8-9% turnover Bronze = 10% turnover or more

63

been given to HouseMark’s national Benchmarking figures.

Demand for livin

housing

Demand for livin properties has been determined by the comparison of three indicators of demand taken from Durham Key Options (DKO) data. Each of these indicators has been scored accordingly with the overall score of all three determining the ranking allocated to the community:

Hard to let properties in a community: This is defined as properties that have been advertised in three or more bidding cycles with DKO before being let. It is important to note that the presence of low demand house types within a community can increase the percentage of hard to let properties within a community. - No properties hard to let = 5 points - 1 to 2% of properties hard to let = 3 points - 3% or more properties hard to let = 1 point

Area of preference: Upon application households can choose their areas of choice. These indicate a

“perception” of an area therefore producing a demand. Areas of preference between communities have

been determined by analysing the number of applicants showing a preference for each community

compared to the amount of applicants received by livin (by percentage). Applicants can indicate a

preference for more than one area and it must be noted that area of preference is made at point of first

application to DKO and is a snapshot in time. Often applicants do not update their areas of preference

and these areas of preference may differ from their original indications during time spent on the housing

register.

- 50% or more applicants expressing the community as an area of preference = 5 points

- 21 to 49% of applicants expressing the community as an area of preference = 3 points

- 0 to 20% of applicants expressing the community as an area of preference = 1 point

Average (mean) bids per property by community: Demand is evident by the volume of bids received for

a property. It is noted that this method will disguise some house types or very localised areas where the

bids per property are very low and in some areas where there are exceptional number of bids per

property.

- 20 bids or more = 5 points

- 10-19 bids = 3 points

- 9 bids or less = 1 point

These three indicators considered together give livin a fair indication of demand for its communities.

However, anecdotal evidence from staff has uncovered that this methodology may disguise the actual

experience of demand in livin communities by using a general mean average over all house types and

sizes. This ranking together with the analysis does indicate areas of further in-depth analysis.

Gold = 11 to 15 points Silver = 6 to 10 points Bronze = 1 to 5 points

64

Average Repair

Costs Per

Property

This has been calculated by analysing the total repair costs for livin properties within each of the 19 community for the period 01 April 2009 to 31 March 2010. To calculate the average repair cost per property the total cost of all repairs for all livin properties in the community has been divided against the total number of stock livin owns within the community.

Gold = £599 or less Silver = £600 to £650 Bronze = £600 or more

Long Term Unemployment (6 to 12 months)

This ranking is based on data supplied by the DWP in March 2011 and relates to the percentage of people residing in the communities of Bishop Middleham and West Cornforth (Bishop Middleham and Cornforth Ward) claiming Jobseekers Allowance for a period of 6 to 12 months. This data has been compared to the overall percentage for Durham County of 18%. Data was obtained from the NOMIS Official Labour Market Statistics supplied by the Office for National Statistics.

Gold = 17% or less (lower than the County percentage) Silver = 18% (equivalent to the County percentage) Bronze = 19% or more (higher than the County percentage)

Average

Household

Income

This ranking is based on national statistics and relates to model-based average weekly household total income estimates for households in the communities of Bishop Middleham and West Cornforth (Bishop Middleham and Cornforth Ward) for 2001/02. This data has been compared to the North East average weekly household total income estimate of £410.00. Data was obtained from the Office for National Statistics.

Gold = £411.00 or more Silver = £410.00 Bronze = £409.99 or less

livin Rental Debit

To assess the rent payments made by tenants within livin properties in Bishop Middleham an analysis and

comparison of our rental debit figures for 2009/10 to 2010/11 have been utilised.

The total rental debit charge is the total rent charged for all livin properties within Bishop Middleham throughout a financial year. At the end of the financial year the total amount of rent payments collected by livin is offset against the total rental debit. The total amount of rent payments collected by livin is calculated within the first week of the following financial year; this ensures that any housing benefit payments have been processed and credited to the relevant rent account. All housing benefit payments paid by DCC are received every 4 weeks and are paid in arrears.

Gold = 0 to 0.99% Silver = 1.00% to 1.99% Bronze = over 2.00%.

65

By offsetting the amount of rent paid throughout the year against the total rental debit charge for the year livin are able to calculate how much outstanding debt it has within each individual community. This outstanding debt is commonly referred to as “rent arrears”. This figure is then calculated as a percentage of the total rental debit charge and has been used to provide the community’s ranking. livin has not been able to base the ranking of rental debit against any validated local benchmarking figures.

Educational Attainment

(5 GCSE’s Grade C & Above)

This ranking is based on national statistics from the 2001 Census data and relates to the percentage of persons residing in the community of Bishop Middleham that have an educational attainment of 5 GCSE’s Grade C and above. This data has been compared and ranked against the County and North East averages of 18%. Data obtained from the Office for National Statistics at www.statisics.co.uk

Gold = 19% or more Silver = 18% Bronze = 17% or less

Environmental

Assessment

On 13 April 2011 staff from livin’s Community and Improving Communities Teams conducted an Environmental Assessment on a pre-determined route through the community. At each “stopping points” a number of economic indicators were scored. The maximum number of points that can be awarded at each stopping point is 35. Environmental indicators included:

Grassed areas & shrubs

Fly tipping & litter

Garages

Pathways, roads & parking

Trees

Boundary walls & fences

Gardens The route through the community began at The Park and continued through to Woodstock Terrace. The total number of points attained throughout the assessment is then divided by the number of stopping points to provide an average total for the community. The community scored a total of 31 points (31 divided by 1). Full details of the Environmental Assessments can be found at: www.sedgefieldboroughhomes.co.uk

Gold = 30 to 35 points

Silver = 21 to 29 points Bronze = 7 to 20 points

66

Total Score for Bishop Middleham

This score is based on a range of economic, social, and environmental indicators contained within the Community Plan for Bishop Middleham. These issues have been scored against strategic priorities from livin’s Corporate Plan 2011-2014. The maximum a community can score is 36. This is based on a maximum of 15 points for economic issues, 12 points for social issues and 9 points for environmental issues.

Contact Us:

livin, Farrell House, Arlington Way, DurhamGate, Spennymoor, Co Durham, DL16 6NL visit: livin.co.uk e: contactus@livin.co.uk t: 0800 587 4538 (free from a landline) or 0300 111 2344 (cheap rate from mobiles depending on your network

0

5

10

15

Economic Social Environmental

Low level

issues

Prominent issues

Substantial

issues

21