BIOGAS REPORT 2014european-biogas.eu/.../uploads/2015/01/EBA-Biogas-Report-2014.pdf · BIOGAS...
Transcript of BIOGAS REPORT 2014european-biogas.eu/.../uploads/2015/01/EBA-Biogas-Report-2014.pdf · BIOGAS...
B I O G A S P R O D U C T I O N I N E U R O P E , D E C E M B E R 2 0 1 4
B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
Page 2 B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
Foreword 3
Methodology and disclaimer 4
Sources 5
Number of biogas plants 6
Biogas production 11
Biomethane production 14
Jobs 18
Support schemes 19
Future prospects 26
T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S
Cover photo: AB Energy
F O R E W O R D
Page 3 B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
Dear members and colleagues,
You have just started to read the fourth Biogas Statistical Report of
EBA. As a rule, EBA report comes as the last one, following many other
reports on biogas industry. In return, we do present the most reliable
data, coming directly from the national associations. In our view only
the industry itself can provide data and answers we would like to pre-
sent to our readers.
As usual, it is Germany which occupies the first rows of all the statis-
tics. However, the dramatic change which started with Renewable En-
ergy Act EEG 2012 continues to hamper the industry. On the other
hand, the biogas industry is increasing in the other parts of Europe –
UK, Italy and Denmark, and we hope that the rest of Europe will follow
this trend.
I am sure you will find a good use of these figures and of the report al-
together. The biogas industry is facing tremendous policy changes, and
it is our responsibility to provide you with the most reliable data to
support our member associations to do political work in your home
countries, to support our scientists in their research on new technolo-
gies, and to support our companies with updated information. EBA Bio-
gas Report 2014 is here to support the work of all of you.
Jan Stambasky
EBA President
The EBA’s Biogas Report covers 27 EU countries (apart from Malta) and Switzerland. It contains compiled
data on the number of biogas and biomethane plants, production, information on support schemes and pre-
dictions of the biogas market in the nearest future. As much as we tried to provide the most recent and the
most accurate data, EBA cannot take any responsibility due to fluctuation and differences in the structure
of the information sources.
Diversity of sources Different data sources were used for compiling this report. The data comes mainly
from the national associations, national statistical reports or - in the absence of submitted data - from pre-
viously compiled data by EBA published in EBA’s regular country profiles. In case of no response from a
particular country, own research and experts’ knowledge was used to assess the development. The sources
and contributors are listed on the following page of this publication. Biomethane figures come from the Eu-
ropean Sustainable Biofuels Forum (ESBF) project that collects data on biofuels in Europe and that EBA is a
partner in.
Data limitations and uncertainties Responses from 24 countries were collected. Disseminated question-
naire contained detailed breakdowns on production, feedstock and support schemes, however, due to lack
of national databases or official registries in observed countries, contributors were unable to provide infor-
mation on all requested data. In total 24 countries reported on installed electrical capacities (MWel), 12 on
biogas production (GWh/year), 21 on generated electricity (GWh) and 14 on thermal energy production
(GWh). Therefore, some comparative data have uncertainties, in particular breakdowns of types of biogas
plants and biomethane upgrading units.
Statistics for Romania and Bulgaria come from the recently published EBA’s country profiles that were
based on findings and support from the national associations and partners in those countries. Lithuanian
data come from the Biogas Report 2013, backed up by own findings. In spite of no response from Luxem-
bourg and Spain, the authors assumed no improvements in the countries compared to the last edition the
report .
Indicators Indicators used for comparing different biogas performances and benchmarking were popula-
tion and biogas production per capita.
M E T H O D O L O G Y
Page 4 B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
D I S C L A I M E R This report was materialised thanks to efforts of EBA members and collaborators providing all the re-
quired statistical data and information. The report is primarily intended for EBA members, free of
charge, and for sale to other interested parties. Use and reproduction of this report and the data con-
tained are allowed, provided that the source is acknowledged. Users shall agree that use of the data con-
tained in this report is made under their own responsibility.
C O N T A C T S Agata Prządka, Technical Advisor [email protected] +32 (0)2 400 1087
Erneszt Kovács, Assistant to the Technical Advisor [email protected] +32 (0)2 400 1089
S O U R C E S
Page 5 B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
Austria
Franz Kirchmeyr, AGRE Austrian Compost & Biogas Association Tel.: +43 6643040761 [email protected]
Belgium
Wallonia - Cécile Heneffe, ValBiom, [email protected] Tel: +32 10 47 38 18 Flanders - Erik Meers, Biogas-E, [email protected]
Bulgaria Bulgarian Biogas Profile, November 2014, EBA
Croatia Ana Marija Špicnagel, IPS Konzalting +385 44540373 [email protected]
The Czech Republic
Jan Stambasky, Czech Biogas Association Tel.: +42 0777208020
Cyprus
Anthi Charalambous, Cyprus Energy Agency [email protected] Georgios Maroulis, RES legal [email protected]
Denmark Søren Tafdrup, Danish Energy Agency [email protected]
Estonia Ahto Oja, Estonian Biogas Association Tel.: +372 5082990
Finland Ari Lampinen, Finnish Biogas Association
France Claire Ingremeau, ATEE Club Biogaz Tel.: +33 146564142
Germany
Oliver Gehrke, German Biogas Association Tel.: +49 816198 46 813 [email protected]
Greece
Efthimios Sakkas, Hellenic Biogas Organization Tel.: +30 2102522350
Hungary
Attila Kovacs, Hungarian Biogas Association Tel.: +36 306014137
Ireland Percy Foster, Composting & Anaerobic Association of Ireland [email protected]
Italy
Lorenzo Maggioni, CIB - Italian Biogas Association Tel.: +39 3939678055 [email protected]
Latvia Andis Karklins, Latvian Biogas Association Tel.: +37 129425176
Lithuania Biogas Report 2013, EBA Darius Strazdas, UAB Manfula
Luxembourg Biogas Report 2013, EBA Jean Schummer, Luxembourg Biogas Association
The Netherlands EBA expert research
Poland EBA expert research
Portugal Flavia Duarte, IrRADIARE [email protected]
Romania Romanian Biogas Profile, May 2013, EBA
Slovakia
Alojz Bernát, AVEOZ Association of energy producers from renewable sources [email protected] Lada Uskobova, Novaenergo [email protected]
Slovenia
Nina Barbara Križnik, Slovenian Biogas Association [email protected] Tel.: +386 01 5898 293
Spain Francisco Repullo, AEBIG - Spanish Biogas Association, [email protected]
Sweden Hanna von Bahr, Energigas Sverige [email protected]
Switzerland Arthur Wellinger, Biomasse Schweiz Tel.: +41 52 365 43 85 [email protected]
UK
Ollie Moore, ADBA Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Association Tel.: +44 020 3176 5440 [email protected]
Page 6 B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
During the previous year Europe saw an
increase in the number of biogas plants
with a total of 14 572. That was 760 more,
compared to the number of plants in 2012
(Table 1, Figure 1). That is an increase of
5.5%, much lower than the 12% growth
rate last year. Significant changes occurred
in different parts of Europe, mainly due to
recent changes in support schemes, that
led to the expected outcomes.
N U M B E R O F B I O G A S P L A N T S
Figure 1: Biogas plants in Europe in 2012 and 2013
Biogas plant in Aiterhofen, Germany. Photo: Schmack Biogas GmbH
8700 9035
Page 7
Table 1: Biogas plants in Europe in 2012 and 2013
B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
Country Total number of
biogas plants 2012
Total number of biogas plants
2013 Agriculture Sewage Landfill Other*
Austria 436 436 201 95 15 125
Belgium 119 118 38 21 23 36
Bulgaria 3 11 8 1 2 0
Croatia 12 11** 11 0 0 0 Cyprus 15 14** 14 0 0 0
The Czech Republic 481 554 382 98 56 18
Denmark 176 155** 67 53 29 6
Estonia 3 11 5 2 4 0
Finland 78 81 12 16 40 13
France 557 610 140 60 301 109
Germany 8 700 9 035 7 850 980 0 205
Greece 22 22 4 11 3 4
Hungary 50 70 35 13 20 2
Ireland 27 27 5 11 8 3
Italy 1 264 1 391 1 121 60 210 0
Latvia 37 53 44 1 6 2
Lithuania 21 21 0 9 9 3
Luxembourg 33 33 26 4 0 0
The Netherlands 252 252 105 82 41 24
Poland 186 206 42 67 97 0
Portugal 26 38 8 8 16 6
Romania 7 8 n/a n/a n/a n/a
Slovakia 92 109 91 8 10 0
Slovenia 33 31** n/a n/a n/a n/a
Spain 22 31 31 0 0 0
Sweden 242 264 39 137 60 28
Switzerland 606 620 97 463 6 54
UK 312 360 62 146 75 52
TOTAL 13 812 14 572 10 438 2 346 1 031 690
*Other - biowaste and industrial biogas plants **Fluctuations due to different sources n/a - not available
Page 8 B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
CENTRE OF EUROPE,
CENTRE OF ATTENTION
A positive trend continued in central Eu-
rope where Hungary, the Czech Republic,
Poland and Slovakia have recorded contin-
uous increases in numbers of biogas
plants. The Czech Republic has opened 73
new plants, Hungary 20, Poland 30 and
Slovakia 19. This resulted in an overall in-
crease of 18% in the region.
DEVELOPMENTS IN THE WEST
Countries that reported a relatively big
number of new plants are those which are
already forerunners in the total numbers:
France with 53 new plants. The UK with 48
and Sweden with 20. Although UK is now
having the majority of biogas plants based
on landfill gas, in 2013 the biggest increase
was in agricultural plants. This increase in
the UK reached 13% this year. Sweden also
opened new agriculture based biogas
plants along with a smaller number of
landfill biogas plants, a total growth of
7.5%.
While most of the countries reported new
biogas plants being commissioned, some
countries reported the same numbers like
the previous year, including Austria with
436 plants, the Netherlands with 252
plants and Ireland with 27. In the case of
Austria, this occurred due to the local caps
that were imposed over the last few years
in these counties. Belgium even saw a clo-
sure of few plants: 2 landfill and 3 sewage
based biogas plants in Wallonia.
SLOWDOWN IN THE KEY
BIOGAS COUNTRIES
Unlike previous years when numbers of
biogas plants in Germany and Italy were
doubling (Italy, 2012) or increasing by
more than thousand a year (Germany,
2011), 2013 brought a rather humble in-
crease in the numbers, relatively smaller
than in the years behind. The German bio-
gas industry is suffering from the new Re-
newable Energy Act (EEG). Further chal-
lenges and a significant slow down in de-
velopment are expected, as the FiT were
reduced since August 2014, while from
2016 FiT for biogas plants above 100 kW
are seen to be cut, capping the plants at
100 MW of installed capacity. Therefore, a
lot of work occurs around plant
repowering and “flexibilisation” of plants.
Regardless of these changes, Germany still
dominates the market, not only by the
number of plants but also services provid-
ed and the know-how.
Italy alongside with Germany occupies the
top with 1 391 plants. However, 270 new
plants opened last year were just a portion
of the 2.5 fold increase recorded two years
ago. The Italian support scheme changed
in 2013, like in Germany, also limiting the
number of new biogas plants, since those
would be the plants affected by the de-
crease in FiT.
Switzerland completes the top 3 with 14
new plants built, but this presents the av-
erage growth over the last several years.
Page 9 B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
and the Czech Republic have them slightly
less in the overall share, 46% and 69%.
Some countries however have all their pro-
duction based on agriculture feedstock,
like Croatia and Cyprus.
Other countries have a rather mixed share
of landfill, sewage sludge and agriculture
based plants, with France, Finland and Po-
land producing biogas mainly from organic
waste and on landfills. The United King-
dom and Sweden extract biogas from sew-
Agriculture72%
Sewage16%
Landfil7%
Other*5%
Figure 2: All biogas plants in Europe in 2012 by type
NEW MARKETS?
Few countries that recently entered the
biogas industry have even upgraded their
capacities and opened new plants. Bulgaria
has eight new plants with several more un-
der construction, Estonia built eight new
plants reaching eleven now. Romania
opened one new plant. Serbia got its first
biogas plant in the north province of Voj-
vodina and its newly founded national as-
sociation became a member of EBA.
AGRICULTURE BASED BIOGAS
PLANTS DOMINATE
As expected, agriculture based biogas
plants that run on energy crops, agricultur-
al residues and manure have the biggest
share in the total number of biogas plants,
making up to 2/3 of all plants (Figure 2 and
3). Germany and Italy have 86% and 80%
of their biogas plants operate with agricul-
tural feedstock respectively, while Austria
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Other* Landfill Sewage Agriculture
Figure 3: Biogas plants in European countries in 2013 by type
Page 10 B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
Feedstock for biogas varies across Europe.
However, countries like Finland, Sweden
and Portugal have very limited use of agri-
cultural feedstock. Sweden’s
6 million tonnes of sewage sludge is fed
into its 137 plants. In case of the UK, the
other country with the largest share of
sewage sludge based plants -
1.6 million tonnes were processed in 146
plants. Agricultural based plants dominate,
that is a fact, however the feedstock still
varies and mostly relies on agricultural
residues, mainly manure that is very often
backed up with energy crops.
There is also a clear corresponding share
of industrial feedstock (food and beverag-
es industry) and the number of such plants
in Belgium, UK and Switzerland.
age sludge. Finnish electricity and thermal
energy generated from landfill biogas
plants make up to 50% each in the overall
biogas generated electricity and thermal
energy although the number of biowaste
plants is increasing. Landfill based plants
in the UK generate the largest share of
electricity (78%), but a growing number of
agricultural plants might reverse this
trend.
Although Greece has only three landfill
based biogas plants out of 22, those repre-
sent 64% of the total installed capacities
(two major plants with capacities of
23.4 MWel and 11.4 MWel).
The big share of agricultural biogas plants
in Europe (Figure 2) can be explained by
the corresponding shares of such plants in
the breakdown of leading biogas produc-
ing countries. Germany, Italy and the Czech
Republic make up for almost 75% of total
biogas plants and are predominantly pro-
ducers from agricultural sources.
Other in Figure 2 and 3 refers to industrial
food and beverage and biowaste.
BIOGAS AND ITS
VERSATILE FEEDSTOCK
Figure 4 shows the breakdown of feed-
stock use (share) in biogas plants in coun-
tries that provided the data. However,
landfill sites were excluded from this
breakdown and only amounts of sub-
strates for biogas plants were covered by
this graph.
Figure 4: Feedstock use in biogas plants
* Belgium (Flanders), Italy (Lombardia)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100% Other
Green waste
Biowaste
Energy crops
Sewage sludge
Industrial
Page 11 B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
B I O G A S P R O D U C T I O N
Country Biogas production
[GWh/year]
Installed electrical
capacity
[MWel]
Generated electricity
[GWh]
Thermal energy
production
[GWh]
Austria 1 570 81 555 660
Belgium n/a 175 785 184
Bulgaria n/a 14 n/a n/a
Croatia n/a 11 58 n/a
Cyprus n/a 10 n/a n/a
The Czech Republic n/a 359 2 241 n/a
Denmark 1 289 n/a 401 n/a
Estonia n/a 10 33 n/a
Finland 556 n/a 151 404
France n/a 259 n/a n/a
Germany 65 731 3 543 24 419 34 762
Greece 1 029 47 217 198
Hungary 1 226 61 443 104
Ireland n/a 30 1 0.5
Italy n/a 1 105 8 890 11 110
Latvia 684 54 275 294
Lithuania n/a 21 33 n/a
Luxembourg 8 7 n/a n/a
The Netherlands n/a 219 1 043 n/a
Poland 1 953 145 658 281
Portugal 651 64 248 2,4
Romania n/a 9 n/a n/a
Slovakia n/a 96 n/a n/a
Slovenia n/a 34 n/a n/a
Spain n/a 19 80 n/a
Sweden 1 686 n/a 46 521
Switzerland 1 067 95.4 277 251
UK 16 591 1 389 6 636 0.4
TOTAL 92 315 7 857 46 885 48 519
Table 2: Biogas production in Europe in 2013
n/a - not available
Page 12 B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
1 Average energy consumption per household in EU is 17 793 kWh (Odysee - Mure, 2013)
2 The numbers correspond to the total generated electricity collected from national biogas associations (21 countires)
298
213
146134
105
72 70 66 6245
35 28 25 24 20 17 14 11 5 2 00
50
100
150
200
250
300
[kWh el per capita]
Figure 5: Biogas production per capita in Europe in 2013
According to EBA’s data, collected for
2013, the total installed electrical capacity
in Europe reached 7 852 MW. 47.5 TWh of
electricity were delivered to the European
network. Apart from the electrical power,
175.3 PJ (48.7 TWh) of thermal energy was
produced, too. The combined amount of
electrical and thermal energy corresponds
to an annual consumption of 5.4 million
average European households1, the num-
ber of households in Belgium and Slovenia
put together. All electricity currently pro-
duced in Europe could replace seven nu-
clear reactors or produce nearly as much
power as 15 coal power plants with an av-
erage capacity of 500 MWel2.
As of 2013, the highest biogas production
per capita was observed in Germany, fol-
lowed by the Czech Republic, Italy and Lat-
via (Figure 5).
When comparing the 2013 biogas produc-
tion to the goals for 2020 introduced in the
National Renewable Energy Actions Plans
(NREAP), there is still a significant gap left
in reaching the national goal in most of the
EU countries (Figure 6). Some countries
like Portugal, have reached its 2020 goal or
in case of Sweden, are well ahead of its
goal. The UK, Austria and Germany are ex-
ceptional, too, as the countries have al-
ready reached more than 85%, 80% and
70% of their NREAP expectations respec-
tively. The targets for these countries were
from the very beginning rather moderate
and therefore, with the current growth fac-
tor, they will achieve their targets without
any doubts. Central European countries,
especially the Czech Republic, Austria and
Hungary continuously increase their pro-
duction and with such trends they could
[kW
hel
per
cap
ita]
Page 13 B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
meet the targets in the upcoming years.
Serious doubts about reaching the 2020
goals are seen in the case of Poland and
Spain, mostly due to their very high targets
and an extremely slow or even non exist-
ent development of new installed capaci-
ties.
Figure 6: Biogas production in 2013 and planned biogas production (electricity, heating & cooling, transport) by 2020 as
stated in the National Renewable Energy Action Plans (NREAPs) in chosen countries
2339
9380
1879
302
25831592
2557
586
17677
5950
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
Biogas production 2013 NREAP 2020 Biogas production target
6573190122 20 046
[GW
h]
Biogas plant in Chynorany, Slovakia. Photo: Biogest
Page 14 B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
In 2013 the biomethane industry kept
growing. As of 2013 there were 48 new
plants commissioned in addition to the ex-
isting 234 plants in 2012 (Table 3 and Fig-
ure 7). The total biomethane production
increased between 2012 and 2013 by
2 483 GWh, yielding in a total of
7 063 GWh (Table 3). The installed capaci-
ty of biomethane plants amounted to
1.303 billion m3 of biomethane.
Although it is difficult to provide a provi-
sion of biomethane production in 2014,
B I O M E T H A N E P R O D U C T I O N
preliminary forecast for 2014 speak cau-
tiously about 20 additional installations. In
the first half of 2014 plants with at least
56.33 million m3 of annual production ca-
pacities were installed in Europe in addi-
tion to the existing capacities.
Table 3 contains the data on biomethane
production and number of plants and fea-
tures only countries with recorded bio-
methane production.
Table 3: Biomethane plants in the years 2012 - 2014 and support for biomethane in Europe
Country
Biomethane
plants
2012
Biomethane
plants
2013
Biomethane plants
feeding
into the grid in 2013
Biomethane
upgrading
capacity in 2013
[Nm3/h]
Tariff or bonus for biomethane in 2014
[EUR/MWh]
Biomethane
plants
2014 *
Austria 10 11 8 2 800 202 12
Denmark 1 3 2 1 450 51 premium 7
Finland 4 5 2 1 111 - 9
France 3 4 3 1 015 125 7
Germany 120 154 135 90 390 - 159
Hungary 1 1 0 25 - 1
Italy 1 2 0 950 94,12 premium n/a
Luxembourg 3 3 3 850 - 3
The Netherlands 19 23 19 11 900 1.03 €/Nm³ 24
Poland 0 0 0 0 69.90 certificate n/a
Slovakia 0 0 0 0 0 107.53
Spain 1 1 1 4 000 - 1
Sweden 53 54 21 27 995 - 55
Switzerland 12 15 15 4 175 - n/a
UK 4 6 5 2 130 92 premium 7
TOTAL 234 282 180 148 791 - +20
* Forecast
Page 15
Table 4: Biomethane production and filling stations in Europe in 2013
B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
Country
Biomethane
production
[GWh/year]
Biomethane use in transport
[GWh]
Biomethane use in transport
[%]
Biomethane filling stations
[100% biogas]
CNG filling stations*
Austria 70 n/a n/a 3 180
Belgium 0 0 0 0 16
Bulgaria 0 0 0 0 110
Croatia 0 0 0 0 3
Cyprus 0 0 0 0 0
The Czech Republic 0 0 0 0 88
Denmark n/a n/a n/a 0 7
Estonia 0 0 0 0 5
Finland 33 11 33 22 25
France 20 n/a n/a 4 310
Germany 7 231 103 1.5 288 920
Greece 0 0 0 0 7 Hungary 4 4 100 1 19
Ireland 0 0 0 0 0
Italy 15 15 100 2 1040
Latvia 0 0 0 0 2
Lithuania 0 0 0 0 5
Luxembourg 26 n/a n/a n/a 7
The Netherlands 900 n/a n/a n/a 141
Poland 0 0 0 0 86
Portugal 0 0 0 0 5
Romania 0 0 0 0 0
Slovakia 0 0 0 0 14
Slovenia 0 0 0 0 7
Spain n/a n/a n/a n/a 69
Sweden 900 869 96.5% 205 205
Switzerland 77 n/a n/a 137 139
UK n/a n/a n/a 8 9
TOTAL 9 366 1 002 approx. 10% 670 3 419
*NGVA Europe, 2014 n/a – not available
Page 16
Figure 7: Number of biomethane plants and upgrading capacity in 2013
B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
A PUSH FOR BIOMETHANE
Although the German domination on bio-
methane market is still crushing, there is a
fresh breeze coming from the other parts
of Europe. In the UK, apart from the six
plants built until the end of 2013, there
will be in total 18 projects commissioned
in 2014 and another 15 are expected to be
completed in 2015. Most of the projects
are based on the waste feedstock with
some addition of agricultural residues or
energy crops. This evolution has been pos-
sible thanks to several changes on national
level: an increase of the oxygen concentra-
tion limit in the biomethane from 0.2% to
1%; introduction of attractive Feed-in Tar-
iff and agreement on the ownership model
between the biomethane producer and the
gas distribution network.
Biomethane production is evolving well in
France, too. In 2013 one more biomethane
project was commissioned, making a total
of four upgrading installations. Three addi-
tional projects are supposed to be finished
in 2014. In the North, Finland has increased
its production capacity by approx. 15% in
2013, but prognoses speak about tripling
those capacities in 2014 and going for even
higher numbers in 2015. All existing plants
were using biogas from sewage sludge or
mixed agricultural residues. Denmark, since
the introduction of new FIT in 2013, gained
momentum and opened two new plants in
2013 and another four in 2014, increasing
the upgrading capacity up to 5 210 Nm3/h
or annual production of 45.64 million m3 .
Germany, besides currently existing 154
biomethane plants with a capacity of
Page 17
21%
40%
5%
30%
3%
1%
Pressure SavingAdsorption
Water Scrubber
Physical basorption
Chemical absorption
Membrane separation
Cryogenic separation
Figure 8: Split of biomethane upgrading units in Europe in 2012
B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
788.4 million m3 in 2013, should have an-
other 28 new projects commissioned be-
fore the end of 2014. According to the Ger-
man Energy Agency DENA, 151 plants are
connected to the grid, while only three in-
stallations are off-grid. In 2015 the bio-
methane industry will certainly slow down
due to amendments to the German Renew-
able Energy Act introduced in August
2014, where bonuses for gas upgrading
have been cancelled. In addition, the FiT
decreased by 40% when compared to the
EEG from 2012.
Biomethane is currently being upgraded
by several available technologies and the
breakdown of currently used technologies
can be seen in Figure 8.
BIOMETHANE TRADE
According to expert reports, a small scale
trade is taking place inside of the EU (for
instance between Germany and The Neth-
erlands, or Germany and Sweden) and be-
tween Germany and Switzerland (approx.
81.5 GWh of biomethane was imported to
Switzerland in 2013). There are also
some minor biomethane exports from
Norway to Sweden, although quantities
are not known.
In December 2013 partners of the project
GreenGasGrids, under aegis of EBA, pub-
lished a European Biomethane Roadmap,
in which the estimated technical poten-
tial for biomethane (syngas and anaero-
bic digestion) for the EU-27 was indicat-
ed to be between 151 and
246 billion Nm3/year or 4.577 to
8.884 PJ/year. Is it predicted that by
2030 about 30% of the produced biogas
will be upgraded to biomethane. Taking
into account consequent political com-
mitment and efficient support schemes,
the authors assess that by 2030
18 billion Nm3 of biomethane from syn-
gas and anaerobic digestion could be pro-
duced for grid injection and gaseous fuel.
Biomethane filling station in Forbach, France
Page 18
Table 5: Jobs in renewable energies and biogas sector in 2013
B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
The large majority of jobs has been created
in Germany. The number corresponds to
approximately 5.5% of the total jobs in the
renewables energy business in Europe and
although not high, it proves significance
and stability of the industry, active espe-
cially in rural areas, as it increased from a
4% share last year. Due to the low re-
sponse on number of jobs in renewable
energy sector and biogas sector in particu-
lar from national associations, the esti-
mates for total numbers are taken from
REN21 and EuObserv’ER.The total number
of jobs in renewable sector, as well as
biogas sector, in particular, as reported by
both REN21 and EuObserv’ER, are
reaching almost 70 000, what is slightly
less than the number of jobs in 2012 and
represents a decrease in jobs by 2% in
biogas sector. This confirms the stability of
the sector compared to others as the total
number of jobs in renewables, including all
renewable energy sources has fallen 28%
since 2011, according to REN21.
J O B S
Country Jobs in renewables
sector
Jobs in biogas sector
Germany 363 100 41 000
UK 939 254 2 650
France n/a 1 700
Ireland n/a 100
Spain n/a 150
Slovenia 188 n/a
Italy n/a 3 670
TOTAL
REN21 report 1 245 000 68 500
EuObserv’ER report
1 218 230 68 895
n/a – not available
Page 19
Figure 6: Types of the support schemes in Europe in 2014
B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
S U P P O R T S C H E M E S
The most widespread form of subsidising
RES was Feed-in Tariff (FiT) for electricity
(Figure 6). Nonetheless, European Com-
mission’s long term goal is to move away
from the FiT towards Feed in Premium or
other support instruments which, accord-
ing to them, give incentives to producers to
respond to market developments. The
highest support was received by plant op-
erators in Switzerland (380 €/MWh for
plants up to 50 kWel with bonus for agri-
cultural residues and bonus for heating
use), Italy (276 €/MWh for plants with ca-
pacities up to 300 kW), Germany
(237 €/MWh for plants up to 75kWel fed
on manure), Latvia (233.12 €/MWh for
plants up to 80 kW with efficient CHP) and
Bulgaria (232 €/MW), as presented in Fig-
ure 7. However, the Bulgarian FIT is very
difficult to predict on the longer run, as it
Page 20 B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
is revised and according to the recent
trends, decreased every year in June.
Spain has switched to premiums in 2014,
while support for biogas plants was ceased
in Cyprus and the Czech Republic. Sweden,
where one certificate is issued for each
MWhel produced, has an established
scheme based on CO2 and energy tax ex-
emptions, which supports the consumers
and creates demand on biogas and bio-
methane, what makes certificates less im-
portant for growth of the sector. Luxem-
bourg has increased the Feed-in-Tariffs for
almost all renewable energy sources in
2014. Biogas incentive increased by 31%,
while biogas from sewage sludge raised by
44%. The new rules will contribute to
Figure 7: The highest maximum support for biogas in 2014
achieving the government’s goal to in-
crease the share of renewable energy by
2020 from the current level about three to
eleven percent. The UK saw a launch of
two new support schemes. On-Farm AD,
launched in October 2013 to help support
the development of new farm based AD in
England. The fund will be applicable to
plants below 250 kW which have access to
slurry and/or manure. Rural Communities
Renewable Energy Fund is a £15 million
fund launched in June 2013. It provides up
to £150 000 of funding for feasibility and
preplanning development work to help
community renewable energy projects be-
come investment ready.
Photo: BTS Italy
Page 21
Table 6: Overview on biogas support schemes in 2014
B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
Austria
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIT 193 15
Subsidies: No further subsidies if a plant receives FIT for electricity
Comments:
Mimimum efficiency must be over 60 %; Plants under 250 kW must use at minimum 30 % farm fertilizer as feedstock (based
on fresh mass); CHP Bonus for plants reaching a efficiency from over ~ 75 % = 2 €c/kWh electricity; Upgrading Bonus for
plants where biogas will be upgraded, injected into gasgrid and power production as application efficiency must be higher
than ~ 75 % = 2 €c/kWh electricity; No further subsidies if the plant gets feed in tariffs for electricity
Belgium
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
Quota (Green Cert.); different for
Wallonia and Flanders 110 in Flanders and 100 in Wallonia
15 for Wallonia / 10 for
Flanders
Certificates: 100 €/MWh for Wallonia and between 93 €/MWh and 110 €/MWh for Flanders
Tax reduction: Tax reduction for investment up to 42% (Wallonia)
Subsidies: Wallonia: from 9% to 27.5% for companies, 20% for farmers, 50% for feasibility studies for townships, 50% for energy audits,
feasibility studies for companies; Flanders: investment subsidy of max 45% - 55% - 65%, max €1 million per project
Comments: Investment subsidy for Flanders is organised by a call system. Maximum €1 million/project, total budget €1.302.100
Bulgaria
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIT
232*
*Tariffs are revised and set by the regulatory authority
for energy every June 30
15
Croatia
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIT 189 14
Subsidies: FIT for biogas (156 €/MWh - 189 €/MWh), for small scale systems 50% if biogas (el. And th.) is used for own purposes
Comments: In 2013, HROTE (Energy market operator) paid €11.292.153,62 of subsidies through the FIT for biogas plants contracts
Cyprus
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIT n/a n/a
Subsidies: EU structural funds for the years 2014 - 2020
Comments:
Biogas is no longer supported in Cyprus. During 2009-2013 the respective support schemes for the promotion of RES
included biogas as a supported technology. However, it should be noted that there are provisions concerning RES support in
The Czech Republic
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIT 128* 20
Comment: *Support for biogas plants was ceased in 2014
Page 22 B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
Denmark
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIP n/a n/a
Comments: Plant numbers and biogas production data are the compiled data for 2013. Generated electricity is estimated since officiel
statistics are not released yet. Feedstock data are not compiled for 2013. Therefore included feedstock data are estimated.
Estonia
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIP 53.7 12
Comments:
New investment support programme for biomethane plant constructions is under development by Environmental
Investment Centre (EIC). Many upcoming measures for building local biomethane production/demand network are ongoing
phase. Currently specific investment subsidy for CHP does not exist. State plan is to support biomethane production for
transport through investment support for biomethane consuming buses.
Finland
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIP n/a 12
Subsidies: Investment subsidy up to 40%
France
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIT 199.7 15
Tax reduction: 10 €/t of waste (on TGAP fee), 20 €/t of waste if flow of leachate
Subsidies: Subsidies from Regional Council and/or national programmes and it depends on a project
Germany
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIT
237.3*
From 1.1.2016. degression of 0.5% per quarter. If cap
of 100 MW is exceeded, degression will amount to
1.27% per quarter
20
Tax reduction: Tax exemption for use of biogas and biomethane in CHP and as a fuel. Partial exemption for electricity tax, operation of
CHP and biogas plant
Subsidies: KfW subsidies of up to 30% for biogas plants, KfW and BAFA subsidies for heat distribution networks, biogas pipelines and
storage
Greece
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIT
230*
Annual increase by 25% of the inflation rate 20
Subsidies: 35%-40% investment subsidy
Page 23 B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
Hungary
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIT
112*
*annual increase by the rate of inflation minus 1% 7-15
Subsidies: 20%-60% from the EU cohesion fund, EU agriculture and rural development funds
Ireland
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIT
157*
Annual adjust of the reference prices by the increase, if
any, in the consumer price index
15
Italy
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIT 276 20
Subsidies: Construction grants in some areas
Comments: Different incentives for biomethane injected into natural gas grids, used in transport or in high efficientcy cogeneration plants
Latvia
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIT
233.12*
*20% degression after 10 years 10 (100%) + 10 (80%)
Comments: Subsidised electricity tax, 5% - 10% of income; subsidies not longer available; no difference in support of biogas production
from landfills, agriculture or WWTP
Lithuania
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIT n/a 12
Subsidies: Investment subsidy of 50%
Luxembourg
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIT n/a 15
The Netherlands
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIP
150*
* base tariffs are set on annual basis 12
Tax reduction: 41.5% tax reduction for upgrading plants
Poland
Type of support system for biogas Highest price for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
Quota 71 min 10
Subsidies: Loans and subsidies from FNOSiGW up to 45% direct on investment
Tax reduction: Exempt from the tax on the sale and consumption of electricity
Page 24 B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
Portugal
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIT n/a 15
Romania
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
Quota n/a 15
Subsidies: Investment subsidies in agricultural sector
Slovakia
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIT
134.08*
* guaranteed for three years and shall not be lower than
90% of the tariff previously applicable
15
Subsidies: Investmeent subsidy up to 30%
Tax reduction: Exemption from excise duty for CBG
Slovenia
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIT 160.56 15
Subsidies: Subsidies from Commmon Agricultural Policy from 40% - 70%
Spain
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIP n/a 15
Comment: A new remuneration system is in place. It consists in two remuneration concepts, a fixed amount depending on installed
electrical capacity, under or over 500 kWel., and year of entering into service, and a second remuneration to compensate
operation and maintenance. The first payment (remuneration to investment) pretends to "guarantee" a profit of 7,5% to the
investment, to be recovered along 25 years.
Sweden
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
Quota 20 15
Tax reduction:
Biogas used for heating and electricity exempted from CO2 and energy taxes; biogas for transport exempted for CO2 tax as
long as sustainable. Tax exemptions for customers buying biomethane as a vehicle fuel. 40% reduction of income tax for use
of company NGVs until 2017
Subsidies: Investments in biogas plants or gas station for biogas could get a subsidy of 45% of the investment costs (maximum 25
million SEK, ~ €2 million
Comments: In 2015 a new sceme are planned: a production subsidy for biogas and biomethane produced from manure. The support is
maximun 2 euro cent per kWh. In Sweden there are tax exemption for the customers that by biomethane as a fuel. In general
Page 25 B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
Switzerland
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIT 380 20
Comments: There is a cap with a waiting list for all RE of several thousand plants
United Kingdom
Type of support system for biogas Highest FIT for biogas [€/MWh] Duration [years]
FIT or quota (Renewables Obligation
Certificate); Renewable Heat
Incentive (RHI)
197*
* an inflation-indexed payment rate table is published
every year prior to February 1
20
Tax reduction: Electricity from renewable sources is eligible for tax relief
Subsidies: On-Farms AD: launched in October 2013 to help support the development of new far based AD in England. The fund will be
applicable to subsidise 250 kW plants which have access to slurry and/or manure.
AD Loan fund: launched in 2011 to help support the construction of food waste digesters. The scheme offers loans of
between £50.000 and £1 million.
Rural Communities Renewable Energy Fund: a £15 million fund launched in June 2013. It provides up to £150.000 of
funding for feasibility and preplanning development work to help community renewable energy projects become investment
ready
Page 26 B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
F U T U R E P R O S P E C T S
HALFWAY THROUGH
The year 2015 will be an important indica-
tor for the whole renewable energy indus-
try. Six years since adoption of Renewable
Energy Directive RED 2009/28/EC and
five years after the introduction of Nation-
al Renewable Energy Action Plans, Mem-
bers States are halfway from their 2020
renewable energy targets. According to the
project Keep On Track, half of the EU coun-
tries will fail to meet their 20% renewa-
bles target by 2020 and there are doubts
about four other Member States reaching
their targets, as progress stood in 2014.
Biogas was so far performing well, but
negative changes or cuts in the support
schemes in some countries during the last
two years are likely to take the wind out of
Europe’s sails in the coming years.
(UN)SUPPORTIVE MEASURES
Since July 2014 all new support schemes
have to correspond to the new Guidelines
on State aid for environmental protection
and energy. The aim of the guidelines was
to bring more competition into renewables
and to make them more competitive. In
fact, the guidelines allow FIT only to biogas
plants below 500 kW of electric capacity,
while those between 500 kW and 1 MW
can be granted a premium. From January
2017, all plants above 1 MW will undergo a
technology-neutral bidding process, unless
Member States can explain to the Commis-
sion why such bidding processes could not
work in particular circumstances. These
guidelines apply to the period up to 2020;
however, they should prepare the ground
for achieving the objectives set in the 2030
Framework. Also in 2014, the Council
adopted a non-binding target for renewa-
ble energy of 27% and a binding GHG re-
duction target of 40% by 2030. Since there
are no national targets but only a Europe-
an one for 2030, it is very likely that only a
handful of ambitious Member States will
push on towards an energy transition and
will invest into new technologies and ca-
pacities, while the rest of Europe will lag
behind, feeling no obligation to contribute
to the single EU target.
The guidelines and the recently estab-
lished climate and energy targets for 2030
will shape the renewable energy policies
and define biogas development in the com-
ing few years. The first country introduc-
ing the new guidelines with even stricter
rules was Germany.
CHALLENGES AHEAD IN
SUPPORT SCHEMES
In Germany experts are forecasting stagna-
tion of the industry. For 2014, the number
of new plants is estimated at 94 (41 MW of
Page 27 B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
installed power), while in 2015 the equiva-
lent value will be even lower. The
100 MWel cap on annual biogas production
growth, introduced by EEG 2014, will most
probably not be reached due to bad overall
conditions. Since August 2014 all new
plants above 500 kWel have to sell electric-
ity directly to the market, and in January
2016 direct marketing will apply to all
plants above 100 kWel.
Contradictory signals are now coming also
from Sweden. According to the new State
Aid Guidelines, the CO2 and energy tax ex-
emptions, which build a baseline of biogas
and biomethane support, are now consid-
ered by the European Commission as state
subsidies and in January 2016 they might
be withdrawn. Furthermore, for 2015 the
Swedish government planned a manure
incentive of 2 €c/kWh for biogas based
manure. Premiums, however, will be
capped to the budget of €2.5 million per
year and will not truly boost the biogas
market. The decisions on these two issues
are still pending and the recent fall of the
government will only create more uncer-
tainty for biogas producers.
In Latvia no new plants will be built until
2016. The government has suspended the
issuing of permits for construction of new
renewable energy plants with FIT. In Janu-
ary 2014 a new act came into force, which
imposes 5% or 10% tax on all income
gained from the electricity production: 5%
applies to agricultural enterprises with uti-
lization of min. 30% manure, efficient use
of heat or high reduction of GHG. Tax on
the other producers amounts to 10%.
The two other Eastern European countries
with a large biogas potential – Hungary
and Poland – showed promise in the
course of 2013 revision of their support
schemes. In 2014, Hungary backtracked
and stopped promising any changes, the
current system based on FITs will proba-
bly be kept. The Polish government is still
working on the RES act, which will move
away from green certificates towards FITs
distributed in an auction system, where
the cheapest technologies have the priori-
ty. According to the Parliamentary com-
mission, the new act should be approved
before next elections in autumn 2015.
FUTURE POLICY
Despite of the hard times ahead for the
sector in Central and Eastern Europe,
many other countries are maintaining
their biogas-friendly policies and even
gaining momentum. The UK for example,
has almost doubled the number of agricul-
tural and waste-based plants between
2011 and 2013. According to WRAP, at the
moment the country has given planning
consents to 285 plants with a total in-
stalled power of 276 MW, which will in-
crease the total of running biogas sites to
over 600. With the development of the
Page 28 B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
English biomethane market, CNG as a vehi-
cle fuel will begin to increase. The only ob-
stacles which may hinder this positive
trend are sustainability criteria coming in-
to place for energy crops and high tariffs
for injecting electricity into the grid. In bio-
methane, decrease of Renewable Heat In-
centive can be expected, which currently is
under revision and should apply as of Jan-
uary 2015. At the time of publication the
RHI reduction was set at 10%.
In the course of 2015 and 2016 in Europe,
we can expect the further development of
biomethane. Italy incentivised biomethane
production in December 2013. Biomethane
will receive different tariffs depending on
its final use: injected into the grid, use as
biofuel or electricity production. We ex-
pect a biomethane boom in early 2015,
when the EU and Italian standards will be
adopted.
Also Finland is on track to decarbonize its
transport sector. Biogas consumption in
transport increased by 168% in 2013,
while consumption for power and heat
production decreased by 2%, when com-
pared to the previous year. This means
that the transport will be the dominant
growth factor for biogas in Finland. In Sep-
tember 2014 at least 31 plants were under
construction or in planning stage, all in
possession of environmental permits.
Speaking about biogas in the North, it is
worth to mention Estonia. The local Envi-
ronmental Investment Centre works ok
new investment support programme for
biomethane plant constructions. The gov-
ernment wishes to develop biomethane as
a transport fuel for buses.
AT THE EU LEVEL ...
At the EU level, important decisions are
scheduled for 2015. After many delays, the
Indirect Land Use Change (ILUC) dossier
will be handed over to the European Par-
liament in January 2015. If the agreement
is reached in April, full implementation of
iLUC in Member States is expected in 2017.
According to the present draft, biomethane
for transport from dedicated crops (cereal
and other starch rich crops, sugars and oil
crops) will be capped at 7%. The rest of
the 10% target is planned to be fulfilled
with advanced biofuels and renewable
electricity. As it stands today, biomethane
from straw, manure, sewage sludge, bio-
waste, biomass fraction of industrial waste
and other non-food cellulosic material is
considered as advanced fuels and the ener-
gy producer from them will be counted
twice towards the 2020 targets.
Another relevant dossier for biogas pro-
ducers is the Fertilisers Regulation pro-
posal which will be passed on by the Euro-
pean Commission to the European Parlia-
ment and the Council in early 2015. Alt-
hough the final version of the proposal was
Page 29 B I O G A S R E P O R T 2 0 1 4
not published yet, it is encouraging to see
that digestate will be recognised as organic
fertiliser which can be sold across the EU.
The final vote on this is likely to take place
either at the end of 2015 or in 2016.
A dossier with a possible strong impact on
the AD sector is the Commission’s Circular
Economy Package, which aims to ban land-
filling and limit incineration of organic
waste as well as to significantly increase
the EU recycling targets. In this matter, AD
is recognised as a recycling process. The
recycling industry and environmental or-
ganisations asked the European Commis-
sion for a prompt implementation of the
proposal, particularly after the Commis-
sion contemplated the withdrawal of its
own proposal back in November. In 2015,
we can expect negotiations between both
co-legislators. From the very beginning
EBA advocates for an ambitious regulation
that requires the separation and reuse of
waste materials in a sustainable way.
All EBA’s efforts aimed at ensuring that
European legislation is adequate and in
line with the interests of the biogas indus-
try will continue throughout 2015. This
will include close monitoring of any new
proposals, as well as meetings with key
MEPs, the Latvian presidency and Commis-
sion officials.
This biogas Report 2014 was created
by European Biogas Association,
December 2014
European Biogas Association
Rue d’Arlon 63-65
1040 Brussels
+32 (0)2 400 1089
www.european-biogas.eu
/european.biogas
/European_Biogas