Beyond CS
Transcript of Beyond CS
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
1/31
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
2/31
Contents
1.Introduction...........................................................................................3
2.Advantages of an area action plan......................................................52.1.1 Working on documents in parallel...................................................... 5
2.1.2 Joint working between authorities...................................................... 6
2.1.3 Clarity through a statutory framework................................................ 6
2.1.4 Alternative approaches......................................................................7
2.1.5 Investment opportunities ................................................................... 8
2.1.6 A Blueprint for investment................................................................ 9
2.1.7 Raising the corporate profile............................................................ 10
2.1.8 Community involvement .................................................................. 11
3.Governance, corporate and partner buy-in ......................................123.1.1 Forming the right group................................................................... 12
3.1.2 Councillor buy-in ............................................................................. 13
3.1.3 Working with partners...................................................................... 15
3.1.4 Working with developers ................................................................. 16
4.Evidence gathering.............................................................................17
4.1.1 Writing a clear brief ......................................................................... 17
4.1.2 Prioritising evidence ........................................................................ 18
4.1.3 Taking a proportionate approach..................................................... 18
5.Community engagement ....................................................................215.1.1 Starting off....................................................................................... 21
5.1.2 The wider community ...................................................................... 22
5.1.3 Flexibility in approach...................................................................... 23
5.1.4 Working with partners...................................................................... 24
5.1.5 Making the most of existing networks.............................................. 26
5.1.6 Thinking about urban and rural areas differently.............................. 27
6.Monitoring and flexibility ...................................................................29
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
3/31
3
1. Introduction
This case study looks at how 13 authorities have developed action area plans (AAPs)
and other development plan documents (DPDs). The authorities have used innovative
ways to deliver identified needs. This study will highlight good practice and key things toconsider when writing your own plans.
The study examines five key themes and the different ways that authorities have
approached them:
advantages of area action plans
governance and buy-in
evidence gathering
community engagement
monitoring and flexibility.
It should be seen as a starting point, offering ideas and options for you to consider,
rather than a rulebook to follow. Area action plans are one useful tool in ensuring a
proactive, managed approach to change in an area. They are part of the development
plan and provide certainty to developers and the community. Produced in the right way,
they are community-owned and set the priorities that council and residents alike want to
see delivered.
We think that action area plans will remain part of the planning framework, but in any
event, some of the experiences outlined here will be useful for future local and
neighbourhood plan making.
The authorities visited were:
Birmingham City Council and Bromsgrove District Council
Hull City Council
London Borough of Barnet
London Borough of Redbridge
London Borough of Wandsworth
Newcastle City Council
Plymouth City Council and South Hams District Council
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
4/31
4
Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames
South Cambridgeshire District Council
Southwark Council
Wakefield Council
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
5/31
5
2. Advantages of an area action plan
The authorities in this report found their area action plans are a useful part of the Local
Development Framework, providing both procedural and practical benefits.
Procedural benefits:
Doing work in parallel with other documents saves time and resources.
Doing work with neighbouring authorities maximises impact and can meet more
aspirations.
Adopting a plan through a statutory process provides clarity.
An AAP is not the only way of dealing with delivery in smaller areas.
Practical benefits:
An AAP shows a commitment to delivery that leads to increased interest in
investment from developers and attracts funding from partners.
It raises the corporate profile of planning.
Involving the community from the outset leads to buy-in and ownership.
It is one way of introducing new policy where there is a gap.
2.1.1 Working on documents in parallel
In South Cambridgeshire, the council set out to run all their DPDs and the core strategy
in parallel. The 3 AAPs had many common elements, such as energy strategy and
affordable housing, for example. It was therefore a sensible approach to work on them at
the same time.
The council decided very early on that there was a need for a very clear steer on what
the public authorities were looking for across all areas of the development, and therefore
all DPDs.
The work was split into topic groups and frontloaded. Evidence needed to be built up
first, which prevents the public from developing unrealistic proposals or expectations.
The plans are in place in time to deal with proposals, regardless of the downturn. This,
Keith Miles suggests, is proof that the planning system can work.
In Wakefield, work on the development policies DPD was carried out in parallel with the
core strategy. This led to major time savings on work such as the sustainability appraisal
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
6/31
6
and the Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA). In particular, carrying out joint
consultation meant that the community were also not subject to consultation fatigue.
2.1.2 Joint working between authorities
Birmingham and Bromsgrovecouncils worked jointly on an
AAP for the site at
Longbridge, a former car plant
and major employer in the
area. Once the plant closed,
the Government set up a task
force to cover key issues,
such as worklessness, and
the need for training. The twocouncils recognised they had
a large strategic site that
required a plan led approach.
The task force and officers at
all levels championed the site
as tailor made for an AAP.
The added value of the AAP is particularly important for Bromsgrove, as they secured
the use they wanted on their part of the site. Longbridge has always been high on the list
of priorities for public sector funding, and the commitment became clear in the AAP.
By going through the formal route and partnering with Birmingham, Bromsgrove were
able to achieve far more than they would have on their own. Having the City as a partner
meant a small district authority has been able to deal with the main developer on a level
footing.
2.1.3 Clarity through a statutory framework
The London Plan was coming forward with a policy of consolidation for Kingston town
centre. The council made the decision against the background of revising an out-of-date
(in terms of a town centre strategy) unitary development plan (UDP), which also had a
similar policy of consolidation.
The council recognised that the town centre was the lifeblood of the local economy. It
was therefore imperative to get the policy framework changed and to be proactive in
getting the town centre regenerated. Officers realised they couldnt have done this with
the UDP policies in place. The AAP gave the council the policy framework needed to get
the sites coming forward. It also provided the framework for infrastructure and otherthings that needed to be improved, such as public realm.
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
7/31
7
2.1.4 Alternative approaches
Developing area spatial strategies
Wandsworth had no history of producing local area plans and decided not to take
forward any area action plans as such. When they came to the site-specific allocations
document (SSAD), officers realised there were areas where there was a concentration
of sites. They proposed to have area spatial strategies dealing with areas of greatest
change in the Borough all in one go. There are eight such areas in the SSAD. This is far
quicker than doing eight different AAPs. The strategies range in size from four or five
sites up to the Nine Elms Area SS, with over 30 sites and 13,00016,000 new homes.
Only having to take one document
through the examination system
rather than if they had chosen to
produce AAPs for all nine areas
was a huge time and resource
saver. Martin Howell adds that
they probably wouldnt have
taken an AAP forward for some of
the smaller ones, but this is a
more flexible approach enabling
us to put forward strategies for
smaller sites as well as larger
ones.
There are at least four very significant areas within the SSAD. Martin believes you have
to weigh up the relative benefit of each approach. We have gained in some areas with
specific proposals for sites, and the community involvement that has generated. We are
clear about community feelings on at least those areas. It is also good for them to see
this as part of the same process, rather than an applications or plans process. It must
be seen together.
Using supplementary planning guidance
At Kingston, the council was originally going to do the AAP for the town centre and then
one for each of their district centres. However, because the policy framework didnt need
to change for the other centres, officers felt they didnt need an AAP for them.
When asked if having an up-to-date and adopted core strategy would have made a
difference to this decision, Pat Loxton responded that they would probably still have
done an AAP for the town centre. This is because the scale of change is considered too
great. So although having an up-to-date policy framework is a key driver in this decision,
scale of change may ultimately determine whether an AAP is produced as opposed to a
less formal plan.
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
8/31
8
Taking a supplementary planning guidance
approach to the district centres meant officers
could do something simpler in about a year for
these centres. The council produced a
regeneration strategy that supports and
supplements other documents, and the corestrategy. It is also area-based guidance. The
council still did local consultation, but didnt
need the policy framework for the district
centres, over and above that in the UDP.
However, the strategies will still be used as a
document for bidding purposes.
Having a regeneration strategy rather than
relying on higher-level policy and a number ofplans means the council is taking a holistic
view, rather than a piecemeal approach. This
leads to a far better chance of coordinating
investment and delivering aspirations.
Officers were of the view that there was already a satisfactory overarching policy
framework. There was nothing inherently wrong with any of the policies, unlike in the
town centre, and so it was more a question of just trying to improve the areas, but in the
direction already set out in the UDP.
There is therefore a choice to be made about the approach that you take in bringing
forward plans for an area, which will depend on the policy framework as well as the
scale of change proposed.
2.1.5 Investment opportunities
At Hull, Nicholas Harne believes that doing the AAP means there is a deliverable and
affordable way of levering in funding. It shows clarity for HCA and others in deciding on
funding. If there are compulsory purchase orders, you have an up-to-date plan that hasbeen examined. This provides certainty to investors.
The city has a number of regeneration areas as priorities. If you are coming in to invest,
where will the council be looking to help you invest? The answer is in the AAP areas.
The council priority is therefore clear. Indeed, this AAP is one of the clearly defined top-
three priorities for the city.
At Plymouth and South Hams, once the AAP is finished, the key allocations get handed
to a named co-ordinator in the delivery team. They talk to developers to unblock
problems, and ask why things arent happening as set out in the plan. The site is then
passed over to development management to facilitate.
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
9/31
9
Richard Grant added: The AAP is the template and statement of aims and objectives
what you show to an investor and developer first. AAPs are almost marketing brochures.
Through them you should be looking to tell a story and persuade people to come in and
invest.
Both councils acknowledged that things have happened at a greater rate and of higherquality in the past 10 years than any other time previously. These plans attract the
developers.
However, Lee Bray suggests it is important to note that it is the entire process you go
through that helps get the investment, not just the final plan. All the engagement work is
crucial. If the developers are aware of work on an AAP, then their contributions can be
picked up to help shape the evidence base and see how it fits into the overall picture.
Having the AAP prevents piecemeal development and individual interests coming
forward.
2.1.6 A Blueprint for investment
Using the AAP to attract investment has been taken a step further at Redbridge. Here,
one of the three AAPs that the council brought forward dealt with Ilford town centre.
Even before the AAP was adopted it became clear that there was significant developer
interest in the area as a result of working on the strategy.
The council came up with the idea of presenting the Ilford town centre AAP in a form that
explained rather better what kind of place they wanted Ilford to become. This givesinvestors clarity about the kind of opportunities on offer. As John Pearce, Planning
Policy Manager, explains: The idea was really to present the dream in a 3D format,
illustrate the sites that are potentially available, and be aware that developers will ask
questions about the sites themselves, so provide links to information about these sites.
The Blueprint provides context to
growth in Ilford and the advantages
that provides (eg good schools, green
belt and open space, accesscorridors). It focuses on all aspects of
the area and not just land use. The
premise is to create the idea that
everyone should come to Ilford, and
show that there is potential. The
planning officers also lifted the more
heavy planning constraints (eg
building heights) in order to be more
flexible. In the words of John Pearce:If you promote something strongly enough, particularly around a vision, people will
believe it.
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
10/31
10
A mix of two policy officers and a regeneration colleague worked on the project. The
Leader was also interested in promoting investment opportunity. He was excited by the
opportunities the AAP generated and wanted to put it in an inspiring and easy to look at
format.
The council sent a specification to a number of IT suppliers with an urban design bent. Ittranspired there were very few around who could do that. Virtual Viewing had access to
a lot of expertise in a variety of fields. They had people who could provide a local
government urban design feel, and who understood that what the council was after was
quite different and unique. They also had the IT capacity. Redbridge provided the
background data and information on sites, working on a storybook approach. Overall,
the work cost 50k.
It is a flexible tool, and can be developed and updated as information is available. This
can be updated in house in future. It provides a strong case for the inward investment
function of regeneration. The council owns the intellectual property, and there has been
a lot of strong response in the authority.
The Ilford Blueprint was launched at investor conferences. It has already won an award:
The SOCITM 2010 Local Government IT Excellence Award. The council may set up an
inward investment unit to deal with the level of enquiries now coming through.
2.1.7 Raising the corporate profile
In Plymouth Richard Grant emphasised that work on any plan doesnt end at adoption.There has to be a corporate understanding.
The Sherford AAP has shaped an ongoing set of negotiations with the developer, with
the key issues around elements of the S106 agreement. The AAP is the template
shaping these negotiations. Although the council is finding that elements of the plan are
difficult to deliver in the recession, the very strong sign up does mean the most important
elements are pretty much immutable. Lee Bray added that without the AAP, there would
be just another suburb growing out across the open fields.
The AAP allows flexibility in a document that will have statutory clout. It also promotes
buy-in as well. Once it is clear the authority means business, you get buy-in from the
sector and from the community. They see the benefit of having a plan with weight, and
can see why to get into it.
In Birmingham and Bromsgrove it has been very easy to get buy-in and sign up to
Longbridge as a priority. The AAP has helped keep it on the agenda when there are
priorities elsewhere. It was also a specific priority in the RSS in terms of technology.
There was never any suggestion that there was any lack of investment, and the AAP
helped with the wider strategic angle and raising the profile of planning in the councils.
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
11/31
11
2.1.8 Community involvement
In Hull, having the AAP also lets the community know there is change going on and they
can be listened to. In these times of a localism agenda, an AAP is effectively their voice
translated into policy, under a statutory framework. Although using supplementary
planning guidance may also work, Nicholas Harne feels that this would lack a bit offramework to hang it off. The AAP was really considered the only option, but it was a
good option.
In South Cambridgeshire, having the AAP was a good way of providing certainty to the
public over what is going to happen, and also what isnt. For example, with large
numbers of houses being proposed, the public can see that development in one area
may show there is no need to develop in another. This is particularly important in
considering new settlements as the clarity provided by the plan can be used to address
issues raised by residents.
In Southwark, there has been very strong commitment of the residents in these
financially strapped times. They keep making sure the councillors know what a priority it
is for them, and therefore the ward councillors are really pushing it forward. They are
very keen on delivery. Residents really use it to say to councillors you have to deliver
this because you have a plan that says so. This is a very powerful message. This gives
confidence to the authority to stand by what is in there. It shows the power of
involvement. Why is something going to get built and why is it in the plan? Evidence has
power. Planners have a more positive role in the development process, and as a result,
are starting to speak the developers language.
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
12/31
12
3. Governance, corporate and partnerbuy-in
This section looks at some examples of good governance arrangements, and who was
involved.
The main lessons on governance are that:
successful plans require a high level of political and corporate buy-in
it is important to establish good working relationships with key partners
preferably early in the process
setting up a specific working body or structure can help
the level of partnership should be linked to the needs of the plan and the issues it
is addressing.
3.1.1 Forming the right group
One of the keys to a successful plan is the early set up of a dedicated group of the right
people to make decisions and take forward actions.
In Barnet, the Colindale AAP dealswith a residential area, in which the
Metropolitan Police have a large
amount of land. The council
involved the right people
themselves (with the Cabinet lead
as Chair), the GLA, the
Metropolitan Police and Fairview (a
key developer) in a steering
group. It was progressed by aworking group that included the
local strategic partnership, Barnet
College, and developers and
landowners with sites or consents
in the area. The cabinet lead was
able to give confidence to the whole process. As a result, there is a good working
relationship between the council and key players.
Birmingham and Bromsgrove got political buy-in right from the start. Back in 2005, a
paper Statement of Principles was agreed by the council, the joint working group
with the key developer/landowner and other stakeholders, and Cabinet. This helped
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
13/31
13
ensure cross-authority councillor (and MP) buy-in. It also set out to all those on the task
force that they needed to have economic-led regeneration on the site meeting strategic
needs, brought forward through an AAP. That was agreed by the councils, either via the
formal decision-making process or signed off by Leaders.
In Southwark, the council prepared an AAP for one of the most deprived estates inLondon. This was part of a bigger, corporate project for the Aylesbury Estate, which was
in need of some major work. In preparing the AAP, they set up a client team. The chair
was director of the project, and they had housing, planning, property, and New Deal for
Communities (NDC) representatives. The team met every couple of weeks. There was
an Aylesbury Regeneration Board, comprising the head of regeneration, as well as
colleagues from housing, planning, and property. All of these were internal.
Planning was one of the things regularly on the agenda, but so was housing
management and other issues. Below this, there was a separate project manager for the
AAP. This project manager was linked to the planning team to check everything was
being produced to time. The group widened out as appropriate to check on different
workstreams. The appointed consultants also had a project manager, and they met
regularly as well to go through the programme. As a council priority, it was well funded,
but this kind of team approach is only set up for the bigger priorities.
Working with someone who had the job of implementing the plan was also useful. It is
crucial to have that link in order to bounce ideas off them about viability and other
aspects not traditionally dealt with in planning. This enabled officers and partners to
have some of the more difficult conversations early.
It can be seen that it is really useful to set out what the key priorities that the plan will
deliver are at the outset. This then leads to a need to formulate a group of key people
from both within and outside the authority. Work can then be shared across the group,
rather than falling on the council to carry out.
3.1.2 Councillor buy-in
Although it is important to have political buy-in and, ideally, membership on the workinggroup, there are other ways the councils have found useful in ensuring councillor buy-in.
The importance of sharing evidence
In South Hams, councillors were faced with a huge housing proposal a 7,000-home
new settlement called Sherford, to be delivered through an AAP. This scale of
development had not been seen in the district before. Richard Grant, Spatial Planning
Co-ordinator at Plymouth, and Lee Bray, Head of Strategic Planning and Economy at
South Hams, feel that to work most effectively with councillors you need to give them
information to share with people and work with them on evidence (in South Hams,
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
14/31
14
councillors commissioned the housing need survey). Lee Bray says: You dont win
buy-in, you have to let councillors come to their own conclusions.
In the end, having a strong vision adopted under one administration may have even
meant the new administration made some decisions against their own ethos, such as
Sherford. But this shows the importance of sharing the information and letting councillorsmake their own decisions.
Once the AAP was adopted, councillors saw the need and were happy to go along with
it. They have taken some brave decisions to support the growth agenda. Their support
has been crucial to guiding the officers through. Councillors werent persuaded by
officers, but by the information.
Getting councillors actively involved
In Hull, they found that a more proactive use of councillors has been the key to gettingsupport. Planning got local councillors involved throughout the process, both formally
through committees and informally through regular small briefings, giving them updates
on the plan process and consultations. The key partner to the council, the Gateway, has
programme managers who deliver the policies set out, and they do a lot of work with the
councillors, getting them fully involved and treating them on an equal footing. The
councillors are happy to be getting professional advice, but also know the area, so they
did their own consultation in one of the areas too, in order to get the ideas for
themselves.
Portfolio holders sit on the delivery boards and regeneration partnerships (which are
locally led). There are also neighbourhood regeneration offices. Having the regeneration
team located in the area helps, and councillors were also publicising this. It is a comfort
to councillors to be able to tell residents they can go to the regeneration office in their
local area.
At events, councillors were always invited as an integral part, and were sometimes used
to speak or facilitate. This provides a very clear and visible link between the councillors,
the community and the work.
A committee-led approach
In South Cambridgeshire, they took all decisions at all stages of the plan to full council.
The development plan was pretty much the only thing dealt with by the full council. As
such, all DPD preparation saw the full council rolling its sleeves up. Keith Miles,
Planning Policy Manager at South Cambridgeshire, took the view that as the council has
to agree the plan in the end, he wanted to take them through at each stage. All stages of
preparation were agreed at key consultation stages, and also they agreed changes as a
result of feedback from consultation. This was a phenomenal amount of work for
councillors as well as officers, but it meant the plan was their plan, and they had total
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
15/31
15
ownership of it. The risk of speeding things up without fully involving councillors
throughout wasnt worth taking.
A delegated approach
In some ways, the experience at Wakefield shows the potential benefits of an alternative
approach to the one at South Cambridgeshire. In terms of councillor involvement,
decisions about preparing DPDs are delegated to the Corporate Director for
Regeneration and Economic Growth. This is done in consultation with a cross-party LDF
sounding board consisting of eight councillors, currently chaired by the Deputy Leader
and Cabinet Member for Regeneration and Economic Growth.
This has allowed them to save time, as they dont have to go to council/committee at
each stage. The arrangement also gets political buy-in inherently in the process. They
can then go to council with the version to be published and submitted.
3.1.3 Working with partners
In Hull, the AAP was born out of two things firstly, a partnership relationship with the
council, Gateway Housing Market Renewal Pathfinder and Keepmoat, Gateways lead
developer in west Hull. Secondly, with no up-to-date adopted plan, the need for a policy
framework for the housing area.
There is a strong relationship between the councils Planning and Housing Service and
Gateway. They also set up an internal working group, including highways and parksdepartments. The housing department was already talking to what is now the HCA all
the time as an external delivery partner.
As with most things, it is best not to apply a one size fits all approach. At Hull, they
used different mechanisms, and applied a layered approach, in order to use the most
appropriate means of getting out what they wanted. For the AAPs, the council would
hold targeted events for stakeholders. These may well be more resource intensive, but
are a good way of getting a single hit from key stakeholders. Internally, officers involve
other teams who are working on related issues, such as the design team for a designguide.
In Southwark, for the Aylesbury Estate AAP, the planners identified who the key partners
were by looking at what infrastructure was there or needed to be provided, and making
sure the relevant partners were involved early on. For example, there was a health
centre on the site, which everyone wanted to see; although earmarked for demolition,
the function needed to be retained. So the PCT were key to discussions about how to
incorporate a new health centre into the AAP. Similarly, the council was also overseeing
a major schools rebuilding programme, so planners and education colleagues worked
together to make sure the AAP and the education strategy were seeking to achieve the
same thing for the estate.
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
16/31
16
At Wakefield, the council has developed a close working relationship with the
Environment Agency, benefitting both organisations. Officers have worked successfully
with them, as flood risk is a key issue in central Wakefield. The Environment Agency
came to support the council in the Examination in Public (EiP). They had carried out two
SFRAs, one at a broad level for the whole of the borough and one more detailed for
central Wakefield.
There is an informal agreement to regularly liaise with each other. They held several
meetings to discuss key issues and entered into a lot of correspondence as well.
3.1.4 Working with developers
In South Cambridgeshire, and in Barnet, the councils worked openly with the developers
up to the stage at which the council had to draw up the plan. At that stage, they withdrew
the working with the developers, and ended up treating them as a representer. This
shows that you can maximise the resources that the developer has without
compromising the integrity of the council as ultimate decision-maker.
At Kingston, the council developed an informal agreement with their chosen developer,
and there is a co-operation agreement to work with them. In parallel with in-house
analysis, they did work on the street scene, permeability and the morphology of the town
centre. The developer also funded a transport study to look at the impact of increased
retail. This approach shows that, particularly in a single area, it is helpful to have the
developer on board at the outset, as a partner, as they can also help to deliver some of
the evidence.
However, it is important to keep the paper walls in place. Developer evidence can be
useful, but developers need to understand they have no guarantee of getting the site
into the plan. Applications can help illustrate what the plan may mean in practice. The
relationship with developers has changed in the new system. There is more joint
working, but also a need to set what the limits are in each case.
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
17/31
17
4. Evidence gathering
This section looks at some different approaches to determining the level and scope of
evidence to be used in making a plan. It also looks at some different approaches to
working with others to gather evidence. In times of scarce resources, there are decisionsto make about what to do in house, as well as how to procure consultants to ensure you
get the most out of them.
The LDF system has freed up what you call evidence, and how you can get it (for
example, through consultation and engagement, not just through studies and surveys).
This is important in the context of moving from statutory consultation through to a more
continuous engagement approach.
Some of the authorities carried out the work on their DPDs prior to the core strategy.
This seems to have had an effect on the amount and type of evidence gathered in some
circumstances.
Some clear learning points in this section are:
write a clear brief if you are working with consultants Also, determine what can
be done in house before going to procurement
prioritise evidence and concentrate on delivery rather than strategy
think about impact and a proportionate approach take a pragmatic approach to
ensure proportionality
cover what you need to support the document, the strategy and the delivery.
4.1.1 Writing a clear brief
Newcastle worked with their housing market renewal pathfinder, Bridging Newcastle
Gateshead, who in turn funded consultants to drive the work on the AAP.
The council spent a lot of time on the brief for selecting consultants, in order to ensure
due process. It was essential to get corporate buy-in so that everyone understood it.
They therefore established a Benwell Scotswood Project Board, with councillors, key
funders, residents, voluntary and business sectors all represented. The brief was
developed with the community and key agencies through the Benwell Scotswood Project
Board. There was also a workshop with a critical friend to ensure the brief had clarity of
purpose.
The remit of board was to manage the whole regeneration programme. It was nottherefore set up just to look at the AAP or procurement. The brief was very clear about
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
18/31
18
frontloading the process, and they had a specific public relations and marketing team to
deal with that.
The council took an innovative approach to the selection of consultants, asking for a
consortium to come forward to work on different streams: the spatial plan, marketing and
communications, business planning and project management.
The consultants agreed to gather evidence, do consultation, carry out the preferred
options report, and then Newcastle City Council took over. The council did the
consultation on preferred options and then took the AAP forward to publication.
Consultants were retained as a critical friend in the latter stages.
Officers then wrote the submission draft, and took everything to the board at every
stage. As part of the review of information that came back, they realised that they had to
redo or make more robust evidence. This was already part of the brief to consultants, to
review evidence at that time, carry out a gap analysis and so on. Having a well-writtenbrief therefore really helped at this stage, as it was not additional work to be procured or
costed.
4.1.2 Prioritising evidence
In Plymouth and South Hams, the sub-regional aspect was important. Consultants
looked at what makes it work and how growth can help it and the surrounding areas.
This determined what needed to be looked at. If the council didnt have the answer to
the questions, they needed to get the evidence.
Richard Grant says: Source what you can from where you can find it. You need to
prioritise to make the most of your resource. Spend money on work where you know you
will deliver something. It is important to concentrate on delivery rather than just having a
strategy.
South Hams did do some of the larger studies, such as a strategic flood risk
assessment, and an employment review. They have not done any retail work, as the
issue is not significant for South Hams. Lee Bray is quick to point out that this is all work
that would have been done anyway, they just brought it in to inform the strategy. He
adds: We did not have much resource to throw at it, so we have to cut our cloth
accordingly. You really need officers who know their stuff. You need to be happy they
can tell the story.
4.1.3 Taking a proportionate approach
In Southwark, the AAP covers a very distinct area, which means it is less easy in some
ways to share evidence with other departments or for other purposes. It is important to
think about the issue of proportionality, particularly for the AAP. The evidence was
therefore much more focussed and site specific. The council looked at what policies
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
19/31
19
needed what evidence, and also what impacts they would have, to determine the scale
of evidence. They decided they didnt need to do the number of studies and type that
were needed for the core strategy, regardless of the fact the core strategy was yet to be
in place. For example, the employment review, carried out for the core strategy, was not
needed for the AAP. In terms of employment, there was more of a look into skills and
training. The retail study on the estate was much more limited in scope. This shows thatthere is a definite proportionality to evidence gathering to suit the document and area
covered.
However, the housing supply and demand model that was developed for calculating
affordable housing has since formed part of the core strategy evidence. There is also a
need to re-house people whilst the estate is being redeveloped, so the model is being
used to look at other areas.
Officers put into the pipeline every scheme they knew about, including the scale and
proportion of affordable housing that they could support. The planning officers worked
with housing colleagues to reconcile records. Housing colleagues were able to share
what they knew about registered social landlord (RSL) work in the pipeline and the
planners added this to their records. This work fed into the Strategic Housing Land
Availability Assessment (SHLAA), so there was a mapping exercise in working out
capacity, phasing timetables and contacting landowners to see what their aspirations
were.
At Wakefield, the development policies
document needed very little evidence. It ismore about demonstrating that policies are
consistent with the core strategy, and the
core strategy with regional and national
policies. This was done by way of simple
tables, including links to how policies meet
up the chain and down to sustainability
appraisal objectives and guiding principles.
The Planning Inspectorate (PINS) found
this helpful.
One of the differences Neville Ford has
found between the development policies
DPD and an area action plan the council
has adopted was the scale of evidence
needed. However, they still adopted a
proportionate approach, looking only at
where evidence from the core strategy
needed to be supplemented.
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
20/31
20
The council did a separate sustainability appraisal for the area action plan. This was
distinct from the core strategy work, but informed by it. They modified the sustainability
appraisal objectives that were set out for the core strategy but made use of quite a lot of
the data that sat behind the objectives. Sustainability appraisal work on the development
policies DPD was also combined as the core strategy and development policies were
done together. This definitely saved in terms of efficiency and resources.
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
21/31
21
5. Community engagement
This section looks at community engagement and how different approaches can be
drawn out depending on which stage the document is at. This section is also a useful
starting point when thinking about neighbourhood plans in the future. Although the AAPis a plan defined by and set out by the council rather than the community, the influence
of the right kind of engagement is clear. These examples illustrate good practice that will
be relevant in helping the community develop neighbourhood plans.
Key points here are:
Whats the starting point what do you know about the community already?
Remember there are more than just residents.
Have a flexible approach for different audiences and stages.
Use consultation events and exercises already planned by others.
Make the most of existing networks, which the community already understand.
Think about rural and urban areas differently.
5.1.1 Starting off
In thinking about who to engage with and how, it is important to set out what you already
know of the area, and share that with the community. This also extends to knowing who
your developers and key landowners are. A call for sites may not always be necessary
for an AAP, but knowing who is out there is important.
The way the engagement was approached in Plymouth and South Hams was to start
with the question: What answers do we need straight away to develop the way
forward? Richard Grant says: You need to look at what the authority needs to do and
shape your approach to that. The catalyst neednt be growth, of course. It is whateverthe vision for the area is.
Plymouth started by splitting the city into communities. They then kicked off the process
by asking Is what we know about your community correct?, What can be improved?
and What do you know that we dont? They also did a series of walkabouts with local
councillors, and held a workshop with invited local people. This was set up to explain
what spatial planning and sustainability are, and what can be altered in the area.
When dealing with a town centre, it is important to remember that there will be a number
of people who are users of the centre who do not live there and so would not be reached
by more standard methods of consultation. So in order to get to know the community in
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
22/31
22
this sense, Kingston kicked off with a big open day inviting the local community, interest
groups and statutory organisations. The council held the event on a Saturday morning in
one of the recently opened clubs in the centre. They set up walking tours and asked
people to record what they liked and didnt like with cameras and on Post-its. The
participants then came back and reported what they found, and what their aspirations
were.
In a similar vain, at South Cambridgeshire, there was an issue over how to engage on a
new settlement where the people who will be living there are not necessarily in the area
at present. With no existing community to consult, they took some of the lessons from
Cambourne, a now-established new settlement in South Cambridgeshire. Here, the
greatest response came from neighbouring communities. The council was keen to work
with these communities in order to show there would be benefits to having the new
settlement, as well as being able to demonstrate how the existing communities could be
protected and enhanced. The council ran workshops, exhibitions and meetings toexplain proposals and give locals an opportunity to help shape them.
5.1.2 The wider community
It is important to remember that there are people with key interests in the area for the
plan who are not residents. In particular, the business community can be hugely
influential, and having them on board early on is crucial. They may not be accessed in
the same way as the residents, as they would be less likely to be able to visit events and
exhibitions, and may not live in the area to receive literature.
In Hull, the council originally considered extending the boundary to include a local
business estate adjacent to the south. Despite not including this in the final plan area,
they still got comments from the business community. Nicolas Harne carried out these
as face-to-face interviews rather than a standard business survey.
Every stakeholder and resident received on a regular basis the Standard newsletter,
updating them on the AAP process, such as upcoming consultation events and
regeneration works taking place. The council tried to go further with those in the local
retail area. This approach reignited interest in a traders group as a result. The councileven used one business owner who ran a bike shop to become the partner in their
cycle-to-work scheme.
Newcastlecarried out telephone surveys of developers. Using marketing people who
had experience of dealing with a product meant they came from a totally different and
useful angle. Seeing the AAP as a product really helped. They also carried out face-to-
face interviews (with a council-agreed set of questions).This meant that the
engagement was perhaps more meaningful to this audience owing to the way the AAP
was explained to them, without planning jargon.
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
23/31
23
5.1.3 Flexibility in approach
In Hull, the council and Gateway took a flexible approach to consultation, so there was a
different nature to the events at each of the formal stages. Issues and options stage was
more fun and informal. This included events in each of the five primary schools in the
area.
The events were set up so that parents could come in at closing time and see what was
going on. There were activities for children to be involved as well. This made it easier for
parents to stay knowing children wouldnt be bored. There was a touch screen TV with
cool or not cool questions, particularly around design issues. The council and Gateway
were then able to have a flavour of what residents views were in that respect and
accommodate those views into design policies.
At preferred options stage, they tailored the work. Between issues and options and
preferred options, they invited people to be more involved should they want to be. Theymoved from the concept plan to a more finalised plan, using the focus group to test
options before they got to preferred options. They used simple language such as
minimum, medium, maximum in terms of impact, which led to preferred.
Every area is broken down into neighbourhoods. These are manageable chunks on
peoples doorsteps, which locals can relate to. Strong community input led to further
mini-rounds of consultation on specific areas. Nicolas Harne believed it was very
important to allow this flexibility to get the fine-tuning, to allow for very local areas to be
focused on and specifically engaged when needed. He added that there does obviouslyneed to be deliverability attached, and any options put forward by residents did need
that element worked on.
As well as traditional methods of consultation, Southwark held more focused sessions
on the estate. The existing neighbourhood group was used in these events, even to the
extent of having some residents to staff the exhibitions. Also to reach the wider area,
they had mail outs and had a database. They included main cross-borough groups like
cyclists groups and faith forums.
On the estate, they held special sessions for different groups, such as Bangladeshi
women and Vietnamese groups, with interpreters. There was also a dedicated disabled
group session. As it was a council estate, they had good knowledge of the
demographics. The New Deal For Communities team and existing tenant groups had
good links back into the community as well.
The council was pretty successful in reaching a high proportion of tenants on the estate.
Right at the beginning, they built a show home and it ran over three weeks. Each week
they changed the layout to show what could be done. This got about 2,000 people
through the door. The council also held fun days and events for children, so that parentscould look around whilst their children are occupied. Officers also found that the children
could be very positive and get parents involved as well.
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
24/31
24
Newcastle also took a flexible approach to feeding back information to the community.
Engagement is a two-way process and following on from events, the council was keen to
feed back in the most meaningful way possible.
There was a workshop at St James Park, and they employed a film crew to capture the
event. Very shortly afterwards, a feedback report was sent out to keep the interest alive.They also sent out a newsletter to everyone. There was a series of events held under
the banner 1 Big Week. For this, they took a consultation vehicle around the area. The
idea was clearly to go to the people, not have the people have to come to you.
To some degree, and owing to a lot of previous council work in the area, there had
already been death by consultation. However, this wasnt wasted by the council, who
reflected this back. They were able to keep showing the thread by saying: You said this,
we did this now what should we do more of/do differently?
The earlier consultation had been carried out for a different purpose, but was asking thesort of questions the AAP issues and options consultation would have been asking.
Despite not setting out a formal issues and options consultation, the Inspector was
satisfied that the due process had been followed. This shows the advantages of linking
work in with what other departments (particularly regeneration) may already have done,
or be doing, in an area.
In addition, the council prepared a parameters report, which was basically consulting on
the baseline. It set out what the evidence showed, what previous consultation said. This
went to the statutory agencies. They didnt do an issues and options report becausethere had been regeneration plans since the 1970s, and other more recent initiatives in
the area. Therefore all issues and options had been carried out under these existing
schemes. The council was happy to be able to show a clear audit trail, and the Inspector
supported this.
The council wanted to make it a bit easier to read, so they produced a summary
document in plain English. A questionnaire went out with that, and that is what they
consulted on. The council wanted qualitative and quantitative responses, so the
questionnaire set a few key issues out. It asked certain questions covering topics such
as What types of houses are needed to help regenerate the area?, rather than asking
Is affordable housing needed?
However, for all the statutory consultees, they did send out the full AAP. This approach
shows flexibility and dealing with different stakeholders in a proportionate and
appropriate way.
5.1.4 Working with partners
At Hull, the council was very fortunate, in that the Gateway had a dedicated professional
communications team, who made sure that the residents were actively brought on
board. They could then draw much more effectively on resources. The council and
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
25/31
25
Gateway resolved to still have standalone events of their own, but also to use others,
already organised, and support ones that may not otherwise have happened. This
presented them with much wider opportunities for engaging the communities.
Gateway and the council organised a lot of events. The brand was made clear, and as
well as music, sports and arts events, they made it clear that there was a conversationto be had about the area. Working with the partners is more about the overall area than
the land use only approach. This style of engagement reflects this very strongly.
There were concerns about the communities being over consulted. Pathfinder
developed NewAnd as the brand, which was created by combining the names
Newington and St Andrews, the two wards being consulted. The two wards had always
been viewed separately by the council, but are now looked at as a whole. This
prevented the council from carrying out the same consultation at different times in
adjoining neighbourhoods, or duplicating consultation. This branding also stretched to
how the AAP was viewed and sold to the community. The council did little to sell it as an
action plan, but more as a neighbourhood regeneration plan, making it more relevant
and realistic. It also ensured that the document related to a place people could
recognise.
In Plymouth and South Hams there was
a huge depth of evidence around
Sherford, and the councils worked very
collaboratively. The Princes
Foundation became involved, and for adistrict like South Hams, the cache that
comes with that may have given the
work the right ring, but the inquiry by
design work really shifted the focus.
From 7,000 objections to Sherford in
the early work on revising the local
plan, there were then only 300
representations on the Sherford AAP,
some of which were in support.
This helps illustrate the value of getting
out and engaging and helping the
community to understand the process.
In Plymouth, the council even set up
workshops to help people make
representations. This was a key part of
ensuring the plan is the citys plan.
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
26/31
26
Plymouth also has a dedicated community engagement co-ordinator who isnt a planner.
This has proved really useful in getting the engagement with different communities. She
has led on all the engagement work.
With a more easily defined community, such as the existing estate in Southwark, the
council was able to use the neighbourhood team. They were able to take the residentsthrough the decision-making process as the council saw it. One effective exercise
involved playing a game looking at the relationship between density, value and design.
They put a grid over the estate, covered in tiles. Residents were then tasked with
reducing the funding deficit by reducing densities and improving the relationship with
surrounding areas. This led to residents quickly realising that as higher land values
could be generated in areas overlooking the park, they set out higher densities in those
areas.
Sometimes there is a readily available and independent resource that can be accessed
locally to help bring in a different approach. In Newcastle, the council had Planning Aid
come in on consultation on preferred options, in particular with schools and faith groups.
The officer involved was excellent. He devised a regeneration play, performed by the
children, and lots of people came. While they were there, the council could talk to
residents in a more jovial, relaxed way. They also went to more diverse groups events.
The idea was very much not to make events where people had to come to, but to go to
existing events.
5.1.5 Making the most of existing networksIn Redbridge, the work on two of their three
adopted AAPs, along the Crossrail corridor
and at Gants Hill, had a high degree of
early engagement and use of existing
organised groups.
Along the Crossrail corridor, there had
been history with previous action plans in
the area, which had brought out key localpeople and a lot of angst in the area
committees. In Seven Kings, the area
committee had started a non-statutory plan.
This was a softer plan dealing with public
realm issues, but not addressing core issues, such as urban decline and the general
degradation of the street scene. The council used this in their discussions to start with
the smaller issues and start to filter in the bigger things.
The community were a little wary of the AAP as there had been previous incarnations,which were softer and dealt with the smaller issues. This plan was sold as more of a
large delivery plan dealing with common issues and able to combine them, such as the
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
27/31
27
absence of a swimming pool and library. Officers were able to show to the public how
the AAP can join up the issues, set a framework and manage the provision, so you can
start to deal with that provision.
Community forums in the area are set up on a more informal basis, but the council
invited service providers along to meetings. This allowed them to say how their plans fitin. It also opened up the community to talk about other issues like housing, which wasnt
always high up on the agenda.
These community forums were set up after the issues and options stage, and used as
the way of doing continuous informal consultation rather than a preferred option report
approach. Each event was a mix of presentation and discussion. Ward councillors were
also invited to the community forums. Councillors carried out Saturday morning
walkabouts of the area. Five or six key people were involved, and this core group
organised a community festival, and other events, to help showcase the plan and get
more local buy-in.
The council also tapped into local groups such as Take Action for Seven Kings. These
contained more vocal people, but they organise events in their local area. They have
local leaders, religious leaders and a new business partnership with members of the
business community on the forum. Ward councillors also walked up the high road and
put posters in windows. In this way, you can maximise impact with minimal effort. Use
existing meetings without having to devote your own staff time and resources.
Some of these key people, such as the religious leaders, received council informationdirectly and then put it on their own websites. In this way, one single message goes to a
larger number of people.
5.1.6 Thinking about urban and rural areas differently
In Plymouth and South Hams, although the area action plan dealing with the new
settlement at Sherford was a joint plan, the council areas are geographically diverse,
and so differing approaches were required.
South Hams has the same pattern of communities, although rural. There was huge
engagement. Officers noted an almost inverse proportion, with the smaller the village,
the larger the interest, particularly in change.
This, Lee Bray feels is the biggest difference between a city and rural area. South Hams
abuts a district, two unitary authorities, the county council, and has part of a national
park within it. It has over 60 local town and parish councils to engage with. This leads to
complex engagement.
So the council decided to deal with the higher tier authorities first and partner with them.Parish work, under the current leader in particular, tried to allow them to be the basic
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
28/31
28
building block of community engagement. About a third have risen to that, a third didnt
quite get it, a third didnt want to.
So instead of trying to go to 60 individual parishes, the council clustered them around
the market towns. There has been a variance in engagement, and willingness.
Both authorities took a very flexible approach. They couldnt just go down the public
meeting approach. Workshops are where people discuss and express their own views
most clearly. In this setting, it is far easier to get people to explain what they want.
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
29/31
29
6. Monitoring and flexibility
This section looks at approaches to monitoring and bringing in flexibility to the plan
policies. It is clear that there is an appetite to try to provide fewer, more qualitative
indicators, but there has been a struggle between that aim and meeting existingmonitoring requirements set out in the core strategy.
The key lessons are:
think about keeping the monitoring simple and specific
link indicators to existing ones where possible rather than making more
think about how the work relates to other areas such as infrastructure delivery
think about monitoring qualitatively and looking at outcomes rather than outputs.
At Barnet, there are monitoring indicators in each AAP. These will be added into the
AMR for this year. There is indicative phasing in the Colindale AAP, and set key
infrastructure phases, but these depend somewhat on development. More work on this
is coming through the infrastructure delivery plan and how that will be updated. They are
continuing to meet with the stakeholder group and will do so for the life of the AAP. The
larger sites are yet to have applications on them. If there isnt the level of development
originally anticipated, then there are some contingencies.
Mill Hill East (MHE) had developers involved, so there were no surprises for them.
Setting quanta of affordable housing is now different from when the AAP came in. The
MHE AAP has some built-in flexibility in its policies in that it has ranges rather than set
levels of provision. This was important as it was recognised that the site would come
forward in a piecemeal fashion rather than as one site, and therefore what may be
achievable in one area may not be appropriate in another.
Planning obligations are covered at the end in a flexible way, setting out more of a
shopping list approach to what may be contributed towards.
In Colindale the developer work included some high-level testing of affordable housing
and code for sustainable homes numbers. They asked the question: How would the
market be hit by insistence on certain levels of affordable housing and a certain code
(4)? The basic response was that S106 only delivers so much, and there would be a
squeeze on affordable housing or code level. The levels were set in line with the London
Plan but everything will be viability tested.
The council will look at the priority for each of the parcels of land, and say these are the
things that must be delivered, with flexibility on other targets.
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
30/31
30
At Kingston, they have looked at what is working corporately and applied it to the
monitoring of the AAP. All the proposed monitoring of policies and proposals are
contained in tables at the back. The AMR also has monitoring of the AAP in there. The
council has now developed an annual implementation plan, which is what they do for
most council plans. This will start from early 2011, and is more of a business plan in
terms of monitoring. It will be a new concept corporately to treat the AAP (a planningdocument) in this way. Normally only corporate delivery plans are subject to this type of
implementation plan. It is a sign that the AAP is seen corporately as a delivery plan,
rather than a land-use plan.
Richard Grant at Plymouth feels thatit is not important to look at individual policies, but
results on the ground. Ask: Is what you set out to happen being delivered? You need to
work to help make the right things happen. Work with the sector and communities to
make the plans work. Theres so much more than the quantum of development. Officers
recognise the need to talk about impacts. What has gone in, not how much? What hasthat done to GDP? This is the way you will end up seeing the plan leading to change on
the ground.
At South Cambridgeshire, Northstowe is now designated as a second phase eco-town.
Although the new settlement at Northstowe has yet to be begun, a gap analysis has
been done to see what is needed to lift the AAP from the existing position to one that will
meet the eco-town standards. The key driver will be those eco standards, and its likely
to lead to a lower-density development, so some related issues will be re-opened. This
is a more proactive use of monitoring, referring back to key principles and seeing how
those will impact on development of different levels and to different standards.
-
8/3/2019 Beyond CS
31/31
Planning Advisory Service
Local Government Improvement and Development
Layden House
76-86 Turnmill Street
London EC1M 5LG
Telephone 020 7664 3000
Email [email protected]
www.pas.gov.uk
The Planning Advisory Service provides consultancy and peer support, learning
events and online resources to improve local government planning.
Sign up for email updates online at www.pas.gov.uk/register
PAS is a Local Government Improvement and Development programme and
part of the Local Government Group. We are funded directly by the Department
of Communities and Local Government.
Cover image: Ilford High Road, with kind permission of the London Borough of
Redbridge
Local Government Group, August 2010
For a copy in Braille, Welsh, larger print or audio,
please contact iHelp on 020 7664 3000.