Bettys Ppt On 30 March
-
Upload
betty122508 -
Category
News & Politics
-
view
713 -
download
0
Transcript of Bettys Ppt On 30 March
![Page 1: Bettys Ppt On 30 March](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58eeacd61a28ab74708b457d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Do they learn differently?An investigation of the pre-service teachers
from US and China
Presenter: Chi-Ying Betty Hu
Date: March 30, 2009
![Page 2: Bettys Ppt On 30 March](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58eeacd61a28ab74708b457d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
You, Z. & Jia, F (2008). Do they learn differently? An investigation of the pre-service teachers from the US and China. Teaching and Teacher education, 24, 836-845.
![Page 3: Bettys Ppt On 30 March](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58eeacd61a28ab74708b457d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Content
I. Introduction
II. Methodology
III. Result
IV. Reflection
![Page 4: Bettys Ppt On 30 March](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58eeacd61a28ab74708b457d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Introduction
(Dunn & Dunn,1979)
Teachers teach the way they learned.
![Page 5: Bettys Ppt On 30 March](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58eeacd61a28ab74708b457d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Introduction
Student s from different cultures tend to exhibit different learning styles and adopted different learning approach.
( Rirchardson, 1994)
![Page 6: Bettys Ppt On 30 March](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58eeacd61a28ab74708b457d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Introduction
Purpose of the studyPurpose of the study
This study is designed to compare the learning style and learning approaches of Chinese and American pre-service teachers.
![Page 7: Bettys Ppt On 30 March](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58eeacd61a28ab74708b457d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
ParticipantsParticipants
Methodology
![Page 8: Bettys Ppt On 30 March](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58eeacd61a28ab74708b457d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Methodology
InstrumentInstrument
![Page 9: Bettys Ppt On 30 March](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58eeacd61a28ab74708b457d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Methodology
QuestionnairesQuestionnaires
![Page 10: Bettys Ppt On 30 March](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58eeacd61a28ab74708b457d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Methodology
Perceptual learning style questionnaire(PLSQ)
2. Tactile
1.Visual
3. Auditory
4. Kinaesthetic 5. Group
6. Individual
![Page 11: Bettys Ppt On 30 March](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58eeacd61a28ab74708b457d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Methodology
Study process questionnaire (SPQ)
2. Deep strategy
1. Deep motivation
3. Surface motivation
4. Surface strategy
![Page 12: Bettys Ppt On 30 March](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58eeacd61a28ab74708b457d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Methodology
ProcedureProcedure
![Page 13: Bettys Ppt On 30 March](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58eeacd61a28ab74708b457d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Variable American Chinese p Mean SD Mean SD Deep motivation
14.86 3.39 16.04 3.54 .006*Deep strategy 14.26 3.53 15.26 3.53 .021Surface motivation 12.81 3.71 13.63 3.59 .072Surface strategy 15.56 3.51 14.40 3.63 .009*
Table 1-(SPQ)
Result
<
>
Deepmotivation
Surfacestrategy
Finding of different Learning Approach
![Page 14: Bettys Ppt On 30 March](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58eeacd61a28ab74708b457d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Result
DM-Chinese > DM-American
The Chinese teacher education students are more likely to be motivated due to their intrinsic interests than the American’s
![Page 15: Bettys Ppt On 30 March](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58eeacd61a28ab74708b457d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Result
SS-American > SS-Chinese
The American teacher education students were more likely to adopt surface strategies such as narrow target and rote
learning to cope with.
![Page 16: Bettys Ppt On 30 March](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58eeacd61a28ab74708b457d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Variable American Chinese P-Value Mean SD Mean SD
Visual 12.41 3.09 11.26 2.07 .007*Tactile 12.80 3.65 13.43 2.55 .108
Auditory 13.02 2.77 13.14 2.69 .730
Kinesthetic 14.40 2.91 13.01 3.34 .000**Group 10.92 4.65 10.98 3.19 .909
Individual 12.09 4.46 12.89 3.20 .096
Table 2-(PLSQ)
Result
Kinesthetic
Visual
>>
Note: Means of 13.5 and above = major learning style preference ; means of 11.50–13.49 = minor learning style preference; means of 11.49 or less = negative learning style preference
Finding of different Learning Style
![Page 17: Bettys Ppt On 30 March](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58eeacd61a28ab74708b457d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Result
Both the Chinese ESL students and the American students were strong in kinesthetic learning style.
(Reid,1987)
![Page 18: Bettys Ppt On 30 March](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58eeacd61a28ab74708b457d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Result
American students took visual learning style as a minor rather than a major preference . (Reid , 1987)
Chinese students were strong visual learners. (Reid , 1987)
![Page 19: Bettys Ppt On 30 March](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58eeacd61a28ab74708b457d/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Reflection
Advantage Special sample selection Clear explanation of statistic analysis
Disadvantage Can not find enough supports from other researchers in the conclusion section.
![Page 20: Bettys Ppt On 30 March](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062412/58eeacd61a28ab74708b457d/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Thanks for your attention.Thanks for your attention.