Benn McGrady , PhD
description
Transcript of Benn McGrady , PhD
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids www.tobaccofreekids.org
The Real Deal on International Trade; Investment Agreements; and Packaging and Labeling Regulations
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids www.tobaccofreekids.org
Benn McGrady, PhDInternational trade and investment lawyer based at Georgetown University’s O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, USA
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids www.tobaccofreekids.org
Topic 1: Government’s power to enact strong packaging and labeling measures.
The Measures• Bans on misleading descriptors / signs
– Required by Article 11 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC)
– Address myth of ‘light’ products being less harmful• Warning labels
– Shall be no less than 30% of the principal display areas, but should be 50% or more under Article 11 of the WHO FCTC
– Guidelines to Article 11 recognize graphic and large warnings to be more effective
• Plain packaging– Not yet implemented (although Australia intends to
implement), but recognized in Guidelines to Articles 11 and 13 of the WHO FCTC
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids www.tobaccofreekids.org
Topic 2: Tobacco Industry arguments and relevant agreements.
Overview of Industry Arguments• Large graphic health warnings, measures prohibiting
misleading descriptors / signs (including trademarks) and plain packaging:– unlawfully interfere with trademark rights under the
Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property; and
– are more trade restrictive than necessary to protect health, contrary to Article 2.2 of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement).
• These arguments ignore widespread implementation of large graphic health warnings and bans on misleading descriptors / signs without a related WTO dispute having arisen.
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids www.tobaccofreekids.org
Topic 3: Relevant WTO Articles: TRIPS
TRIPS and Trademark Registration
• TRIPS and the Paris Convention oblige Parties to register trademarks in certain circumstances.– No obligation to register misleading
marks (Art. 6 quinquies (B)(3) Paris Convention; TRIPS Art. 15.2)
– Warning labels, plain packaging and even bans on use of misleading marks can be implemented without interfering with trademark registration.
Trademark Rights: Not Rights of Use
• A trademark right under these agreements is a negative right to prevent others from using the mark in certain circumstances. (TRIPS Art. 16; EC - Geographical Indications)– WTO Members are not obliged to permit
trademark owners to use their marks.– TRIPS is not violated simply because a
tobacco control measure affects use of a trademark.
Unjustifiable Encumbrances on Trademarks
• TRIPS Article 20 prohibits WTO Members from unjustifiably encumbering the use of a trademark with special requirements.
• It is not clear what types of measures constitute special requirements under Article 20.
• Nonetheless, Article 20 concerns only ‘unjustifiable’ encumbrances.
• The principles in TRIPS Article 8 emphasize that WTO Members may adopt measures necessary to protect public health.
• These principles guide what is ‘unjustifiable’ i.e. necessary measures are justifiable.
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids www.tobaccofreekids.org
Topic 4: The Necessity Requirement in WTO Law
Measures Necessary to Protect Human Life or Health
• Guidance may be sought in Article XX(b) of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which permits measures necessary to protect human life or health.
• To determine whether a measure is necessary, WTO panels weigh the trade restrictiveness of a measure against its contribution to health protection, in light of the importance of the goal.
• WTO panels then consider whether less trade restrictive alternatives are reasonably available.
Measures Necessary to Protect Human Life or Health
• In recent cases, a high degree of deference has been shown to the regulatory choices of WTO Members.
• Protecting human health is considered to be a goal of the highest importance. (Source: EC - Asbestos)
• The effectiveness of a measure need not be established (the measure need only make a material contribution to its goal). (Source: Brazil - Retreaded Tyres)
• WTO law is also interpreted in light of other international laws. (Source: US - Gasoline)
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids www.tobaccofreekids.org
Topic 5: The TBT Agreement and The Necessity Requirement
The TBT Agreement
• Article 2.2 provides that technical regulations shall not be more trade restrictive than necessary to achieve a legitimate objective, such as protection of human health.
• A technical regulation to protect health, in accordance with relevant international standards shall be presumed necessary.
• Whether WHO FCTC guidelines would constitute relevant international standards is an open question.
Conclusion on WTO Law
• Bans on misleading descriptors / signs (including trademarks) and large graphic health warnings are implemented widely, without controversy at the WTO.
• Plain packaging is yet to be implemented, but should withstand any WTO challenge due to – the limited character of trademark rights under
TRIPS; and – the necessity of the measure to protect human
health, as reflected in guidelines to Articles 11 and 13 of the WHO FCTC.
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids www.tobaccofreekids.org
Topic 6: Investment Agreements
International Investment Agreements
• Companies have standing to bring claims under these agreements as foreign investors.
• Tobacco companies argue that international investment agreements require payment of compensation from governments implementing packaging measures because those measures interfere with property rights.
• Philip Morris is bringing a claim against Uruguay concerning:– the size of pack warnings (80% of pack surface);– the content of the graphics; and– implementation of the Uruguayan prohibition on misleading
packaging.
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids www.tobaccofreekids.org
Topic 7: Protection of Investors’ Property Rights
Expropriation of Investments
• Tobacco companies argue that packaging measures expropriate trademarks and other rights indirectly.
• In determining whether expropriation has occurred tribunals usually consider factors including:– the impact of a measure on property rights;– the objective and character of the measure i.e. whether
it is general regulation; and– whether there is a relationship of proportionality
between the measure, its objective and the impact on property rights.
• This type of analysis usually leaves considerable scope for health measures.
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids www.tobaccofreekids.org
Topic 8: How governments can protect themselves.
Protecting Against Expropriation Claims
• To minimize uncertainty governments can:– carve tobacco products or tobacco control measures
out of an international investment agreement; and– clarify key concepts such as expropriation.
• Governments can also protect themselves by:– refusing to register misleading tobacco trademarks,
the act of which may create a domestic law property right for a tobacco company;
– not making specific representations to tobacco companies about their ability to avoid regulation.
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids www.tobaccofreekids.org
Thank you for your participation
Engage With Us
• Website: www.tobaccocontrollaws.org
• Email: [email protected]