Belton_A Case for Close Analysis

download Belton_A Case for Close Analysis

of 5

Transcript of Belton_A Case for Close Analysis

  • 8/19/2019 Belton_A Case for Close Analysis

    1/8

    02/02/2016, 1322A Case for Close Analysis

    Page 1 of 8http://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/13761232.0040.104/--case-for-close-analysis?rgn=main;view=fulltext

    ! #$%& '() #*(%& !+$*,%-% John Belton

     Volume 40, Issue 1, January 2016

    Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.13761232.0040.104[http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.13761232.0040.104]

    [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/]

    The task of film criticism differs from that of film theory. Film theory asks questions about

    the nature of cinema as a whole, while film criticism seeks to understand the meaning of 

    specific films. This distinction is admittedly broad and tends to ignore critical practice that

    combines theory and criticism, moving back and forth between the analysis of individualfilms and the insights which that analysis provides for our understanding of the cinema as

    a whole. Every film is surely an instance of the cinema, and the meaning of that particular

    film is bound up with the essential operations of cinema as a medium. One cannot talk 

    about the mise-en-scene, editing, or sound of any one film without understanding how 

    these practices function (and have functioned) in the cinema as a whole.

     Within the field of film criticism, there exist a variety of practices, ranging from informal

    conversation among spectators about a film they have just seen to film reviews published

    in the mass media. Last but not least are the various academic discourses that take up onecritical methodology or another in an effort to read a film. All of these practices hopefully 

    speak to our experience of the film w hile at the same time substituting that experience for

    a meta-text that replaces the film. No matter what path the critic takes through the film, it

    seems to me—after over 45 years of attempting to write about the meaning of films in all of 

    the venues cited above—one starting point for thinking about a film that has proven more

    productive than all others is close analysis.

    To start with close analysis is to start with a description of the film as an object that is

    quasi-phenomenological. Admittedly, the operations of segmentation and the shot-by-shotanalysis of individual scenes impose a certain rationality upon the phenomenological

    method, but close analysis nonetheless seeks to describe the film as a necessary first step

    in exploring its meaning. The short essay that follows is motivated by my indebtedness to

    the methods of close analysis, the genuine pleasures of teaching close analysis, and the

    revelations that close analysis has given me about a film I have long loved but, until

    recently, not taught before: John Ford’s How Green was My Valley (1941). The recent

    death of one of its stars, Maureen O’Hara, gives me yet another reason to write about the

    film.

    Midway through the film, the narrator Huw’s sister, Angharad (O’Hara), marries the mine

    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.13761232.0040.104http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.13761232.0040.104http://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/13761232.0040.1*?rgn=main;view=fulltexthttp://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/13761232.0040?rgn=main;view=fulltext

  • 8/19/2019 Belton_A Case for Close Analysis

    2/8

    02/02/2016, 1322A Case for Close Analysis

    Page 2 of 8http://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/13761232.0040.104/--case-for-close-analysis?rgn=main;view=fulltext

    owner’s son, though she is hopelessly in love with Mr. Gruffydd (Walter Pidgeon), the

    preacher who marries them. This wedding is in stark contrast to her brother Ivor’s

     wedding seen near the end of the film’s opening act. The earlier ceremony is filled with

    music, with hymns sung by a choir in the church and with Welsh folk songs sung by the

    entire village as the happy couple exits the church.

     Angharad’s wedding is filmed in nine shots.

    [/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000001.jpg]

    [/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000002.jpg]

    http://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000002.jpghttp://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000001.jpg

  • 8/19/2019 Belton_A Case for Close Analysis

    3/8

    02/02/2016, 1322A Case for Close Analysis

    Page 3 of 8http://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/13761232.0040.104/--case-for-close-analysis?rgn=main;view=fulltext

    [/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000003.jpg]

    [/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000004.jpg]

    http://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000004.jpghttp://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000003.jpg

  • 8/19/2019 Belton_A Case for Close Analysis

    4/8

    02/02/2016, 1322A Case for Close Analysis

    Page 4 of 8http://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/13761232.0040.104/--case-for-close-analysis?rgn=main;view=fulltext

    [/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000005.jpg]

    [/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000006.jpg]

    http://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000006.jpghttp://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000005.jpg

  • 8/19/2019 Belton_A Case for Close Analysis

    5/8

    02/02/2016, 1322A Case for Close Analysis

    Page 5 of 8http://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/13761232.0040.104/--case-for-close-analysis?rgn=main;view=fulltext

    [/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000007.jpg]

    [/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000008.jpg]

    http://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000008.jpghttp://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000007.jpg

  • 8/19/2019 Belton_A Case for Close Analysis

    6/8

    02/02/2016, 1322A Case for Close Analysis

    Page 6 of 8http://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/13761232.0040.104/--case-for-close-analysis?rgn=main;view=fulltext

    [/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000009a.jpg]

    [/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000009b.jpg]

    http://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000009b.jpghttp://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000009a.jpg

  • 8/19/2019 Belton_A Case for Close Analysis

    7/8

    02/02/2016, 1322A Case for Close Analysis

    Page 7 of 8http://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/13761232.0040.104/--case-for-close-analysis?rgn=main;view=fulltext

    [/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000009c.jpg]

     All of the shots feature the village chapel in the background, though the first and last shots

    frame the scene and answer one another. The first, low-angle shot of the church steeple

    introduces the scene with the ringing of a solitary bell. The same bell accompanied Ivor’s

     wedding, but, for that event, the bell pealed . Here the bell tolled , as if for a funeral. The

    last shot of the scene is the most complex, involving a variety of figural and camera

    movements. But this shot ends with the distant image of Mr. Gruffydd standing alone in

    the church’s graveyard. In other words, the first and last shots establish the wedding as a

    metaphorical funeral.

    Click Here for Video Clip [/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000010.mp4]

    The bell tolls throughout the scene. But in shot six, Mr. Morgan (Donald Crisp) asks “Is

    there to be no singing at my daughter’s wedding?” This prompts Dai Bando (Rhys

     Williams) to begin singing the Welsh hymn “Arglwydd, Arwain Trwy'r Anialwch” (a.k.a

    “Bread of Heaven”). The lyrics speak of a pilgrim asking the Lord’s guidance through the

     wilderness, to the shores of the river Jordan, and imploring “Death of death, and hell's

    destruction, Land me safe on Canaan's side.” Not exactly a joyous wedding hymn; one

    understands the music in terms of the marriage/journey that Angharad has begun as shesteps into the waiting carriage.

     At the center of the scene (shots four and five), Angharad and her husband emerge from

    the chapel, first in medium close shot, then in medium shot. Angharad’s dead eyes are

    fixed in a trance-like stare directly in front of her—and remain so—until near the end of 

    shot nine (9b) when she darts a panicked look back at the church in search of Mr.

    Gruffydd, who only appears after she and her husband have left the shot. During Ivor’s

     wedding, Angharad’s and Mr. Griffydd’s eyes meet twice in eye-line matches that create

    them as a couple. Here their eyes are not permitted to meet. Angharad’s stiff bodily movements in shots four and five and eight and nine present her as a figure of repression,

    http://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000010.mp4http://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/images/13761232.0040.104-00000009c.jpg

  • 8/19/2019 Belton_A Case for Close Analysis

    8/8

    02/02/2016, 1322A Case for Close Analysis

    Page 8 of 8http://quod.lib.umich.edu/f/fc/13761232.0040.104/--case-for-close-analysis?rgn=main;view=fulltext

    forbidding herself to express any emotion except that of despair.

     How Green was My Valley is a film about loss. It depicts the disappearance of an idyllic

     way of life in which the individual and the family are in harmony with the larger

    community, united in the performance of common rituals (work, return home, bathing,

    dinner, receipt of spending money, weddings) and in the singing of traditional folk songs

    as they return home from work. Economic change (a wage cut followed by a strike)destroys this world, visiting loss upon it. Huw’s brothers die or are forced to leave home to

    find work elsewhere. At the end, his father dies. The entire narration takes place under the

    shadow of Huw’s own departure from the only world he has ever known. Angharad’s

     wedding marks yet another instance of loss—one that exposes the mode of reverie that the

    narration has adopted to be a mask for the funereal mourning that is the true narrative

    mode of the film.

    !./0() 1-(2)$30,4John Belton teaches film at Rutgers University and is the author of five books, including

    Widescreen Cinema, winner of the 1993 Kraszna Krausz prize for books on the moving

    image, and American Cinema/American Culture. He also edits a series of books on film

    and culture for Columbia University Press.

    Hosted by Michigan Publishing, a division of the University of Michigan Library .

    For more information please contact [email protected].

    Online ISSN forthcoming

    mailto:[email protected]?subject=Film%20Criticismhttp://www.lib.umich.edu/http://www.publishing.umich.edu/